Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

On concentrated vortices of 3D incompressible Euler equations under helical symmetry: with swirl

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that 3D incompressible Euler equations under helical symmetry admit concentrated traveling-rotating vortex tubes with nonzero helical swirl, whose vorticity converges to a singular helical filament as the tube radius…

desk verdict First with-swirl helical vortex desingularization, built on a careful 2D formulation; the main risk is a single imported Green's function lemma from the authors' earlier paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.10725 v1 pith:ISUY2OII submitted 2024-12-14 math.AP

Guolin Qin , Jie Wan This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 76B4735J2576B03
keywords incompressibleEulerequationshelicalsymmetryconcentratedvorticesswirltraveling-rotatingvariationalmethodssemilinearellipticvortexfilaments
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to remove the orthogonality condition (zero helical swirl) from the construction of concentrated helical vortices in three-dimensional incompressible Euler flow. It first derives a two-dimensional vorticity-stream system, Theorem 1.1, that governs helical Euler solutions with swirl; the earlier no-swirl model is the special case where the extra swirl variable vanishes. It then uses a variational method to build, for any pitch $h$, circulation $\kappa$, and radius $r_*\in(0,R)$, a family of traveling-rotating helical vortex tubes in the cylinder $B_R\times\mathbb{R}$. As $\varepsilon\to0$ the vorticity support has diameter of order $\varepsilon$ and converges in distribution to $\kappa$ times the Dirac measure on the helix (1.8), the singular filament evolved by binormal curvature flow. If correct, the result shows that the vortex filament conjecture holds in the helical-symmetric setting even when velocity and vorticity are not orthogonal.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Green's function $G_K(x,y)$ of the elliptic operator $L_K=-\operatorname{div}(K\nabla)$ on the disk, with the refined decomposition from Lemma 4.1: $G_K(x,y)=\frac{\sqrt{\det K(x)}^{-1}+\sqrt{\det K(y)}^{-1}}{2}\,\Gamma\!\left(\frac{T_x+T_y}{2}(x-y)\right)+H_0(x,y)$, where $\Gamma$ is the planar logarithmic fundamental solution and $H_0$ is uniformly bounded and locally H\"older. This expansion turns the self-interaction of a vortex patch of scale $\varepsilon$ into the leading logarithmic factor $(1/2\pi)\ln(1/\varepsilon)$, and the variational maximization of the energy $E_\varepsilon$ over the constraint set $M_{\kappa,\Lambda}$ then forces the support to sit near the level set $|x|=r_*$ through the concentration profile $Y(x)=\frac{\kappa}{2\pi}\sqrt{\det K(x)}^{-1}-\alpha|x|^2$, with $\alpha=\frac{\kappa}{4\pi h\sqrt{h^2+r_*^2}}$. The bathtub principle fixes the shape of maximizers, and the refined bounds on the Lagrange multiplier and on the vanishing of the vortex-patch term select solutions of the semilinear equation (3.10) corresponding to genuine Euler flows with swirl.

What would settle it

Compute or rigorously bound the remainder $H_0$ in Lemma 4.1 for $L_K$ in a disk (for some $h$ and $R$) and check whether the near-diagonal kernel at separation $\sim\varepsilon$ equals $\frac{\sqrt{\det K(x)}^{-1}+\sqrt{\det K(y)}^{-1}}{2}\,\Gamma\!\left(\frac{T_x+T_y}{2}(x-y)\right)$ plus $O(1)$; a counterexample where $H_0$ grows like $\ln(1/\varepsilon)$ along the diagonal would break the lower bound in Lemma 4.4 and the diameter estimates $r_1\varepsilon\le\operatorname{diam}(\operatorname{supp}(\zeta_\varepsilon))\le r_2\varepsilon$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Theorem 1.4 states that for any $h\ne0$, $\kappa>0$, and $r_*\in(0,R)$ there is $\varepsilon_0>0$ such that for every small $\varepsilon$ there is a helical symmetric solution pair $(v_\varepsilon,P_\varepsilon)$ of the Euler equations in the infinite cylinder whose vorticity support is a traveling-rotating helical tube concentrating on the helix (1.8). The convergence $w_\varepsilon(\cdot,|\ln\varepsilon|^{-1}\tau)\to\kappa\,\delta_{\gamma(\tau)}t_{\gamma(\tau)}$ holds in the distributional sense, the helical swirl $v_{\xi,\varepsilon}$ is not identically zero, and the cross-sectional diameter of the support lies between $r_1\varepsilon$ and $r_2\varepsilon$. The companion reduction, Theorem 1.1, is a 2D vorticity-stream system (1.17) with an extra scalar variable for helical swirl; when the swirl is zero it collapses to the classical system (1.15). The proof proceeds by choosing profile functions $F_1$ and $F_2$, solving the semilinear elliptic equation (3.10) through maximizers of an energy functional over a fixed-circulation, bounded-density constraint set, and showing the maximizers concentrate on the circle $|x|=r_*$ with diameter of order $\varepsilon$.

Load-bearing premise

The concentration and diameter estimates rest on the quantitative Green's function expansion of Lemma 4.1, in particular on the remainder $H_0$ being uniformly bounded; if that remainder were unbounded or the leading kernel changed at scale $\varepsilon$, the maximizers could fail to concentrate at $|x|=r_*$ or to have cross-sectional diameter of order $\varepsilon$.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every admissible helix there are true Euler solutions whose vorticity is confined to a helical tube of cross-section radius of order $\varepsilon$, and the tube travels and rotates without changing shape.
  • The distributional limit $w_\varepsilon(\cdot,|\ln\varepsilon|^{-1}\tau)\to\kappa\,\delta_{\gamma(\tau)}t_{\gamma(\tau)}$ realizes the binormal-curvature-flow helix (1.8) as the singular limit of actual vorticity fields, a positive step for the vortex filament conjecture in the helical case.
  • The orthogonality condition $v\cdot\xi=0$ is not required for concentration; the helical swirl is genuinely nonzero inside the tube and zero outside it.
  • The 2D vorticity-stream system (1.17) extends the classical no-swirl model (1.15) and reduces the 3D helical Euler construction to a 2D elliptic problem, so the same reduction is available for other helical flow questions.
  • The profile functions $F_1$ and $F_2$ can be varied (the paper notes $p>1$ choices giving $C^1$ classical solutions), so the theorem supplies a family of concentrated solutions rather than a single example.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Likely the same variational scheme works in the whole space $\mathbb{R}^3$ using the whole-space Green's function decomposition mentioned in Remark 1.6, giving concentrated helical vortices with swirl outside cylinders.
  • The 2D system (1.17) offers a concrete starting point for proving global well-posedness of helical Euler with swirl, a problem the paper explicitly leaves open.
  • Because the transverse-vorticity terms vanish in the distributional limit, the helical vortex filament limit may be robust under more general helical perturbations than the orthogonal ones; helical symmetry itself, not orthogonality, appears to be the essential structure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies concentrated helical vortices of the 3D incompressible Euler equations without the usual 'orthogonality condition' v·ξ=0. In Theorem 1.1 the authors derive a 2D vorticity-stream formulation in helical symmetry that includes the helical swirl as an additional transported scalar. They then look for traveling-rotating invariant solutions and reduce the problem to the non-autonomous semilinear elliptic equation (3.10). The core of the paper is a variational construction in Section 4: for prescribed h, κ, r*, the authors define an energy Eε over a class of bounded vorticities with fixed circulation, prove existence of maximizers, and then establish that, as ε→0, the maximizer support concentrates near the helix (1.8), has diameter of order ε, and gives rise to a nontrivial helical swirl. The main theorem asserts distributional convergence of the vorticity to κδ_{γ(τ)} t_{γ(τ)} and a nonzero swirl component.

Significance. If the proof is correct, this is a substantial step: it removes the orthogonality condition that all previous helical-vortex constructions (e.g., [9,13,14,22,36]) imposed, and it does so by a variational method rather than gluing. The derivation of the 2D model (1.17) is explicit and self-contained, and the paper carefully fixes the angular speed and Lagrange multiplier from the circulation and geometry rather than from normalization. The concentration regime is quantified by the diameter bounds r1ε≤diam≤r2ε. The main weakness is that the asymptotic machinery rests on the Green's function decomposition imported from the authors' companion paper [14]; the present paper does not prove or fully verify that result. The variational proof also contains a few places where important estimates are asserted without the needed justification.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.1, Lemma 4.1] The concentration proof rests on Lemma 4.1, imported from [14], and this lemma is load-bearing for nearly every estimate that follows. The boundedness of H0 is used in (4.24), (4.25), (4.41)–(4.43), and the refined self-interaction expansion in Lemma 4.13; the exact singular part is used whenever GK is replaced by its logarithmic leading term. Since the statement as printed only asserts an upper bound H0(x,y)≤C and gives no proof, the paper is not self-contained at its most critical point. Please reproduce the precise statement of the corresponding theorem from [14], verify that all hypotheses hold for D=BR(0) with the coefficient matrix K from (1.16), and make explicit the dependence of the constants on the ellipticity constants. If the result is to be treated as a black box, that should be stated explicitly; as written, the referee cannot check the key hypothesis on which Theorem 1.4 depends.
  2. [§4.7, Step 1 of the proof of Theorem 1.4] The assertion ∫D 2h²vε/|ξ|^4 dx = O(ε) does not follow from (4.54) alone: (4.54) shows only that this integral is bounded by κ. The estimate is true if one combines Lemma 4.12 (diam(supp ζε)=O(ε)) with Lemma 4.10 (||(ψε)+||L∞ ≤ C for fixed Λ), but this reasoning is omitted. The same applies to the bound for the term involving x·∇vε, which is needed for the distributional convergence (4.56). Please supply the missing argument explicitly, since this step is directly used to identify the coefficient in the delta-limit.
  3. [§4.6, Lemma 4.13] The conclusion g=h from equality in Riesz's rearrangement inequality is terse. The paper cites Lemma 3.2 of [6] but does not state its hypotheses or verify them for the functions gε, g△ε, g, and h. To justify the radial symmetry of (ψ*)+ used in Lemma 4.14, one needs to check compact support, equality of masses, finiteness of the logarithmic interaction energy, and the fact that the weak limits g and h both have zero first moment. Please expand this argument so that the equality case is precisely documented.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2, proof of Lemma 2.5] The displayed formula for ∂x1ϕ in the proof has a sign error: it should read ∂x1ϕ = -1/h²[(h²+x1²)u2 - x1x2u1] to be consistent with the correct identity (2.7) and with Lemma 2.6. The displayed equation (2.7) itself appears correct, so this is a typo in the proof rather than a mathematical error.
  2. [§4.3, after (4.28)] In the line following (4.27), the quantity 'dγ' should be 'κγ'; otherwise the displayed lower bound is not the one obtained from the preceding inequality.
  3. [§4.2, Lemma 4.2] There are several typographical errors in this lemma and its proof: 'taht' should be 'that', 'Lesbague' should be 'Lebesgue', and the condition on Λ is stated with αa+b although later estimates use Λ0 independent of ε; please clarify that ᾱ-dependent terms are handled uniformly for small ε.
  4. [Theorem 1.4 and §4] Theorem 1.4 states h≠0, but Section 4 assumes h>0 throughout. The case h<0 presumably follows by a reflection or by an analogous argument, but this reduction is not stated. Please add a sentence explaining how the case h<0 is obtained.
  5. [§4.7, Theorem 1.4] The phrase 'topological traveling-rotating helical tube' is used to describe the support set, but no precise topological characterization of the support is proved. Since the cross-section is only known to have diameter of order ε and to be small, a brief clarification of what 'topological tube' means here would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the construction is variational, the ansatz choices are explicit, and the imported Green's-function lemma is an independent published theorem rather than a restatement of the target result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is: (i) reduce helical 3D Euler with swirl to the 2D system (1.17) via Theorem 1.1; (ii) reduce rotating-invariant solutions to the semilinear elliptic problem (3.9)-(3.10); (iii) define the variational problem (4.8)-(4.9) with profile functions F1, F2 and the engineered energy density J_epsilon; (iv) prove existence of maximizers and analyze their asymptotics using the Green's function expansion Lemma 4.1. Steps (i)-(ii) are algebraic and self-contained, using only standard helical-function facts cited from [27], which are not the authors' own results. Step (iii) is an explicit ansatz, not a disguised fit: the paper states the choice of F1, F2 in (1.20) and says 'The reason of the choice of J(r,s) in (4.21) is shown in section 4.' The Euler-Lagrange equation reproduces the desired semilinear equation by construction, which is exactly how a variational existence proof works; the Lagrange multiplier mu_epsilon is an internal parameter, not a predicted physical quantity. Step (iv) relies on Lemma 4.1, imported from the authors' earlier paper [14] with D. Cao. This is load-bearing and is a self-citation, but it is a published theorem about the Green's function of the fixed elliptic operator L_K in a bounded domain; it does not assume the existence of concentrated helical vortices, is not fitted to the present data, and has assumptions that do not include the target result. Under the stated rules, such a citation counts as independent support. The parameter alpha is chosen from the prescribed r*, kappa, h so that the leading profile Y is maximized at |x|=r*; this is standard parameter tuning for a construction with a prescribed concentration location, not a fitted input renamed as a prediction, because Theorem 1.4 proves existence for every prescribed r*. Thus no equation in the paper reduces to another equation by definition, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The legitimate concern raised by the skeptical note is whether the imported Green's function expansion is correct and whether H0 is uniformly bounded, but that is a correctness/verification risk, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; the constructions use existing notions of helical swirl, vorticity, and stream function. The few free constants are shape and truncation choices, not fitted parameters.

free parameters (3)
  • a = arbitrary positive constant
    Slope of profile F1(s) = epsilon^{-1} a (s - mu_epsilon)_+; chosen by hand, not fitted. Different a gives different families.
  • b = arbitrary nonnegative constant
    Patch strength in F2(s) = epsilon^{-2}(b + alpha |ln epsilon| a epsilon) 1_{s > mu_epsilon}; chosen by hand, not fitted.
  • Lambda = sufficiently large constant Lambda0
    Upper bound in the constraint set M_{kappa,Lambda}; chosen large so the maximizer never saturates the bound (Lemma 4.11). Not fitted to data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Helical symmetry framework: helical functions and vector fields, xi = (x2, -x1, h), decomposition u = v - (v dot xi) xi / |xi|^2
    The entire reduction in Theorem 1.1 and the solution ansatz in Section 3 use this frame; it is the physical symmetry under study.
  • domain assumption Lemma 4.1 Green's function decomposition for LK from [14]
    Imported from prior work by Cao and Wan. It provides the leading ln(1/epsilon) singularity and controls the remainder H0; all later estimates use it.
  • domain assumption D = B_R(0) is a rotationally invariant disk with smooth boundary
    Needed for nonzero angular velocity and to define the cross-section; the theorem is for infinite cylinders B_R(0) x R.
  • standard math Riesz rearrangement, bathtub principle, elliptic regularity, moving plane method
    Used in Lemmas 4.2, 4.13 and 4.14; standard tools from the cited literature.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On concentrated vortices of 3D incompressible Euler equations under helical symmetry: with swirl." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ISUY2OII

@misc{pith2026241210725,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On concentrated vortices of 3D incompressible Euler equations under helical symmetry: with swirl},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ISUY2OII}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.10725}
}
abstract

In this paper, we consider the existence of concentrated helical vortices of 3D incompressible Euler equations with swirl. First, without the assumption of the orthogonality condition, we derive a 2D vorticity-stream formulation of 3D incompressible Euler equations under helical symmetry. Then based on this system, we deduce a non-autonomous second order semilinear elliptic equations in divergence form, whose solutions correspond to traveling-rotating invariant helical vortices with non-zero helical swirl. Finally, by using Arnold's variational method, that is, finding maximizers of a properly defined energy functional over a certain function space and proving the asymptotic behavior of maximizers, we construct families of concentrated traveling-rotating helical vortices of 3D incompressible Euler equations with non-zero helical swirl in infinite cylinders. As parameter $ \varepsilon\to0 $, the associated vorticity fields tend asymptotically to a singular helical vortex filament evolved by the binormal curvature flow.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Piecewise smooth stationary Euler flows with support in a neighborhood of a helix

    math.AP 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0 of 10

    Helically symmetric, compactly supported, piecewise smooth stationary Euler flows exist with anisotropic (elliptic) vortex cross-sections and a persistent cos 3θ boundary deformation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [14]

    Cao and J

    D. Cao and J. Wan, Structure of Green’s function of ellip tic equations and helical vortex patches for 3D incompressible Euler equations, Math. Ann. , 388 (2024), 2627–2669

    work page 2024

  2. [6]

    Burchard and Y

    A. Burchard and Y. Guo, Compactness via symmetrization, J. Funct. Anal. , 214 (1) (2004), 40–73

    work page 2004

  3. [1]

    Abe, Existence of vortex rings in Beltrami flows

    K. Abe, Existence of vortex rings in Beltrami flows. Comm. Math. Phys. , 391 (2022), no. 2, 873–899

    work page 2022

  4. [2]

    Abidi and S

    H. Abidi and S. Sakrani, Global well-posedness of helico idal Euler equations, J. Funct. Anal. , 271 (2016), no. 8, 2177–2214

    work page 2016

  5. [3]

    W. Ao, Y. Liu and J. Wei, Clustered travelling vortex ring s to the axisymmetric three-dimensional incompressible Euler flows, Phys. D , 434 (2022), Paper No. 133258

    work page 2022

  6. [4]

    Arms and F.R

    R.J. Arms and F.R. Hama, Localized induction concept on a curved vortex and motion of an elliptic vortex ring, Phys. Fluids , 8 (1965), 553–559

    work page 1965

  7. [5]

    Bronzi, M.C

    A.C. Bronzi, M.C. Lopes Filho and H.J. Nussenzveig Lopes , Global existence of a weak solution of the incompressible Euler equations with helical symmetry a nd Lp vorticity, Indiana Univ. Math. J. , 64 (2015), no. 1, 309–341

    work page 2015

  8. [7]

    Caffarelli and A

    L.A. Caffarelli and A. Friedman, Asymptotic estimates fo r the plasma problem, Duke Math. J. , 47 (1980), 705–742

    work page 1980

Show all 65 references
  1. [8]

    D. Cao, B. Fan and S. Lai, Concentrated solutions with hel ical symmetry for the 3D Euler equation and rearrangments, J. Differential Equations , 394 (2024), 152–173

    2024

  2. [9]

    Cao and S

    D. Cao and S. Lai, Helical symmetry vortices for 3D incomp ressible Euler equations, J. Differential Equations, 360 (2023), 67–89

    2023

  3. [10]

    D. Cao, R. Li, G. Qin, J. Wan, Existence of helical symmet ry vortex patch with small cross-section for the incompressible Euler equations in R3. J. Differential Equations , to appear

  4. [11]

    D. Cao, Z. Liu and J. Wei, Regularization of point vortic es for the Euler equation in dimension two, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 212 (2014), 179–217

    2014

  5. [12]

    D. Cao, S. Peng and S. Yan, Planar vortex patch problem in incompressible steady flow, Adv. Math., 270 (2015), 263–301

    2015

  6. [13]

    Cao and J

    D. Cao and J. Wan, Helical vortices with small cross-sec tion for 3D incompressible Euler equation, J. Funct. Anal., 284 (2023), no. 7, Paper No. 109836, 48 pp. 3D EULER EQUATIONS WITH HELICAL SYMMETRY 47

    2023

  7. [15]

    D. Cao, J. Wan, G. Wang and W. Zhan, Asymptotic behavior o f global vortex rings, Nonlinearity, 35 (2022), no. 7, 3680–3705

    2022

  8. [16]

    Cao and W

    D. Cao and W. Zhan, On the steady axisymmetric vortex rin gs for 3-D incompressible Euler flows, preprint

  9. [17]

    Chiron, Vortex helices for the Gross-Pitaevskii equ ation, J

    D. Chiron, Vortex helices for the Gross-Pitaevskii equ ation, J. Math. Pures Appl. , 84 (9) (2005), no. 11, 1555–1647

    2005

  10. [18]

    Da Rios, Sul moto d’un liquido indefinito con un filet to vorticoso di forma qualunque, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo (1884-1940) , 22 (1906), no

    L.S. Da Rios, Sul moto d’un liquido indefinito con un filet to vorticoso di forma qualunque, Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo (1884-1940) , 22 (1906), no. 1, 117–135

    1906

  11. [19]

    Dávila, M

    J. Dávila, M. del Pino, M. Medina and R. Rodiac, Interact ing helical vortex filaments in the 3- dimensional Ginzburg-Landau equation, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) , 24 (2022), no. 12, 4143–4199

    2022

  12. [20]

    Dávila, M

    J. Dávila, M. del Pino, M. Medina and R. Rodiac, Interact ing helical traveling waves for the Gross- Pitaevskii equation, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire , 39 (2022), no. 6, 1319–1367

    2022

  13. [21]

    D ´avila, M

    J. D ´avila, M. del Pino, M. Musso and J. Wei, Gluing methods for vor tex dynamics in Euler flows, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 235 (2020), 1467–1530

    2020

  14. [22]

    D ´avila, M

    J. D ´avila, M. del Pino, M. Musso and J. Wei, Travelling helices an d the vortex filament conjecture in the incompressible Euler equations, Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations , 61 (2022), no.4, Paper No. 119, 30 pp

    2022

  15. [23]

    de Valeriola and J

    S. de Valeriola and J. Van Schaftingen, Desingularizat ion of vortex rings and shallow water vortices by a semilinear elliptic problem, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 210 (2013), 409–450

    2013

  16. [24]

    Dutrifoy, Existence globale en temps de solutions h ´elico¨idales des ´equations d’Euler, C

    A. Dutrifoy, Existence globale en temps de solutions h ´elico¨idales des ´equations d’Euler, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris S ´er. I Math. , 329 (1999), no. 7, 653–656

    1999

  17. [25]

    Enciso and D

    A. Enciso and D. Peralta-Salas, Existence of knotted vo rtex tubes in steady Euler flows, Acta Math., 214 (1) (2015), 61–134

    2015

  18. [26]

    Enciso and D

    A. Enciso and D. Peralta-Salas, Knotted vortex lines an d vortex tubes in stationary fluid flows, Eur. Math. Soc. Newsl. , 96 (2015), 26–33

    2015

  19. [27]

    Ettinger and E.S

    B. Ettinger and E.S. Titi, Global existence and uniquen ess of weak solutions of three-dimensional Euler equations with helical symmetry in the absence of vort icity stretching, SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 41 (2009), no. 1, 269–296

    2009

  20. [28]

    Fraenkel, On steady vortex rings of small cross-se ction in an ideal fluid, Proc

    L.E. Fraenkel, On steady vortex rings of small cross-se ction in an ideal fluid, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. , 316 (1970), 29–62

    1970

  21. [29]

    Fraenkel, Examples of steady vortex rings of small cross-section in an ideal fluid, J

    L.E. Fraenkel, Examples of steady vortex rings of small cross-section in an ideal fluid, J. Fluid Mech. , 51 (1972), 119–135

    1972

  22. [30]

    Fraenkel and M.S

    L.E. Fraenkel and M.S. Berger, A global theory of steady vortex rings in an ideal fluid, Acta Math. , 132 (1974), 13–51

    1974

  23. [31]

    Friedman and B

    A. Friedman and B. Turkington, Vortex rings: existence and asymptotic estimates, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 268 (1) (1981), 1–37

    1981

  24. [32]

    Fukumoto and T

    Y. Fukumoto and T. Miyazaki, Three-dimensional distor tions of a vortex filament with axial velocity. J. Fluid Mech. , 222 (1991), 369–416

    1991

  25. [33]

    García, Vortex patches choreography for active scal ar equations, J

    C. García, Vortex patches choreography for active scal ar equations, J. Nonlinear Sci. , 31 (2021), no. 5, Paper No. 75, 31 pp

    2021

  26. [34]

    García, Kármán vortex street in incompressible fluid models, Nonlinearity, 33 (2020), no

    C. García, Kármán vortex street in incompressible fluid models, Nonlinearity, 33 (2020), no. 4, 1625– 1676

    2020

  27. [35]

    Gilbarg and N.S

    D. Gilbarg and N.S. Trudinger, Elliptic Partial Differe ntial Equations of Second Order, Classics in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin, (2001)

    2001

  28. [36]

    Guerra and M

    I. Guerra and M. Musso, Cluster of vortex helices in the i ncompressible 3d Euler equations. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire , to appear. 48 GUOLIN QIN, JIE W AN

  29. [37]

    Guo and L

    D. Guo and L. Zhao, Global well-posedness of weak soluti ons to the incompressible Euler equations with helical symmetry in R3. J. Differential Equations , 416 (2025), part 1, 806–868

    2025

  30. [38]

    Hassainia and M.H

    Z. Hassainia and M.H. Wheeler, Multipole vortex patch e quilibria for active scalar equations, SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 54 (2022), no. 6, 6054–6095

    2022

  31. [39]

    Hassainia and T

    Z. Hassainia and T. Hmidi, Steady asymmetric vortex pai rs for Euler equations, Discrete Contin. dyn. Syst., 41 (4) (2021),1939–1969

    2021

  32. [40]

    Helmholtz, On integrals of the hydrodynamics equati ons which express vortex motion, J

    H. Helmholtz, On integrals of the hydrodynamics equati ons which express vortex motion, J. Reine Angew. Math. , 55 (1858), 25–55. (English translation by P. G. Tait: Phil. Mag. , Ser. 4, 33 (1867), 485–512.)

  33. [41]

    Hmidi and J

    T. Hmidi and J. Mateu, Existence of corotating and count er-rotating vortex pairs for active scalar equations, Comm. Math. Phys. , 350 (2017), 699–747

    2017

  34. [42]

    Jerrard and C

    R.L. Jerrard and C. Seis, On the vortex filament conjectu re for Euler flows, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 224 (2017), no. 1, 135–172

    2017

  35. [43]

    Jerrard and D

    R.L. Jerrard and D. Smets, On the motion of a curve by its b inormal curvature, J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 17 (2015), no. 6, 1487–1515

    2015

  36. [44]

    Q. Jiu, J. Li, D. Niu, Global existence of weak solutions to the three-dimensional Euler equations with helical symmetry. J. Differential Equations , 262 (2017), no. 10, 5179–5205

    2017

  37. [45]

    Jiu, M.C

    Q. Jiu, M.C. Lopes Filho, D. Niu and H.J. Nussenzveig Lop es, The limit of vanishing viscosity for the incompressible 3D Navier-Stokes equations with helica l symmetry, Phys. D , 376/377 (2018), 238–246

    2018

  38. [46]

    Keener, Knotted vortex filaments in an ideal fluid, J

    J.P. Keener, Knotted vortex filaments in an ideal fluid, J. Fluid Mech. , 211 (2) (1990), 629–651

    1990

  39. [47]

    Lamb, Hydrodynamics, Cambridge Mathematical Libra ry, 6th edn

    H. Lamb, Hydrodynamics, Cambridge Mathematical Libra ry, 6th edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1932)

    1932

  40. [48]

    Levi-Civita, Sull’attrazione esercitata da una lin ea materiale in punti prossimi alla linea stessa, Rend

    T. Levi-Civita, Sull’attrazione esercitata da una lin ea materiale in punti prossimi alla linea stessa, Rend. R. Acc. Lincei , 17 (1908), 3–15

    1908

  41. [49]

    Levi-Civita, Attrazione newtoniana dei tubi sottil i e vortici filiformi, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Classe di Scienze Ser

    T. Levi-Civita, Attrazione newtoniana dei tubi sottil i e vortici filiformi, Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - Classe di Scienze Ser. 2 , 1 (1932), no. 3, 229–250

    1932

  42. [50]

    Lieb and M

    E.H. Lieb and M. Loss, Analysis, 2nd ed., Graduate Studi es in Mathematics, vol. 14, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, (2001)

    2001

  43. [51]

    Lopes Filho, A.L

    M.C. Lopes Filho, A.L. Mazzucato, D. Niu, H.J. Nussenzv eig Lopes and E.S. Titi, Planar limits of three-dimensional incompressible flows with helical symme try, J. Dynam. Differential Equations , 26 (2014), no. 4, 843–869

    2014

  44. [52]

    Majda and A

    A. Majda and A. Bertozzi, Vorticity and incompressible flow, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (2002)

    2002

  45. [53]

    Moore and P.G

    D.W. Moore and P.G. Saffman, The motion of a vortex filamen t with axial flow, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A , 272 (1972), 403–429

    1972

  46. [54]

    Ni, On the existence of global vortex rings, J

    W.M. Ni, On the existence of global vortex rings, J. Anal. Math. , 37 (1980), 208–247

    1980

  47. [55]

    Norbury, A steady vortex ring close to Hill’s spheric al vortex, Proc

    J. Norbury, A steady vortex ring close to Hill’s spheric al vortex, Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. , 72 (1972), 253–284

    1972

  48. [56]

    Ricca, Rediscovery of da rios equations, Nature, 352 (1991), no

    R.L. Ricca, Rediscovery of da rios equations, Nature, 352 (1991), no. 6336, 561–562

    1991

  49. [57]

    Ricca, The contributions of Da Rios and Levi-Civit a to asymptotic potential theory and vortex filament dynamics, Fluid dyn

    R.L. Ricca, The contributions of Da Rios and Levi-Civit a to asymptotic potential theory and vortex filament dynamics, Fluid dyn. Res. , 18 (5) (1996), 245–268

    1996

  50. [58]

    Saffman, Vortex dynamics, Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, New York, (1992)

    P.G. Saffman, Vortex dynamics, Cambridge Monographs on Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, New York, (1992)

    1992

  51. [59]

    Smets and J

    D. Smets and J. Van Schaftingen, Desingularization of v ortices for the Euler equation, Arch. Rational Mech. Anal., 198 (2010), 869–925

    2010

  52. [60]

    Thomson (Lord Kelvin), Vortex statics, Proc

    W. Thomson (Lord Kelvin), Vortex statics, Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. , 9 (1875), 59–73

  53. [61]

    Thomson (Lord Kelvin), Mathematical and Physical Pa pers, IV., Cambridge, (1910)

    W. Thomson (Lord Kelvin), Mathematical and Physical Pa pers, IV., Cambridge, (1910)

    1910

  54. [62]

    Turkington, On steady vortex flow in two dimensions

    B. Turkington, On steady vortex flow in two dimensions. I , II, Comm. Partial Differential Equations , 8 (1983), 999–1030, 1031–1071. 3D EULER EQUATIONS WITH HELICAL SYMMETRY 49

    1983

  55. [63]

    Turkington, Vortex rings with swirl: axisymmetric s olutions of the Euler equations with nonzero helicity, SIAM J

    B. Turkington, Vortex rings with swirl: axisymmetric s olutions of the Euler equations with nonzero helicity, SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 20 (1) (1989), 57–73

    1989

  56. [64]

    Wei and J

    J. Wei and J. Yang, Traveling vortex helices for Schrödi nger map equations, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 368 (2016), no. 4, 2589–2622

    2016

  57. [65]

    Yang, Global vortex rings and asymptotic behaviour, Nonlinear Anal., 25 (1995), no

    J. Yang, Global vortex rings and asymptotic behaviour, Nonlinear Anal., 25 (1995), no. 5, 531–546. School of Mathematical Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China Email address : qinguolin18@mails.ucas.ac.cn School of Mathematics and Statistics, B...

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.