Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Sparse Relational Reasoning with Object-Centric Representations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.07512 v1 pith:IU7VRREP submitted 2022-07-15 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords object-centricrelationalrepresentationsmodelsperformancewhenadditionallyarchitectures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We investigate the composability of soft-rules learned by relational neural architectures when operating over object-centric (slot-based) representations, under a variety of sparsity-inducing constraints. We find that increasing sparsity, especially on features, improves the performance of some models and leads to simpler relations. Additionally, we observe that object-centric representations can be detrimental when not all objects are fully captured; a failure mode to which CNNs are less prone. These findings demonstrate the trade-offs between interpretability and performance, even for models designed to tackle relational tasks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Transformers Use Causal World Models in Maze-Solving Tasks

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Maze-solving transformers store a causal, steerable map of maze connections in sparse features, and activating these features is more effective than removing them.

Pith tools