pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20329 · v1 · pith:IVVGU7CBnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.supr-con

Orbital-Angular-Momentum Entangled Photon Emission from Circular Currents in Semiconductor-Superconductor Structures

Avi Koriat , Ankit Kumar , Alex Hayat This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 01:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.supr-con
keywords orbital angular momentumentangled photonssuperconducting light-emitting diodecircular supercurrentsemiconductor-superconductor structuresOAM entanglementquantum communicationphase inheritance
0
0 comments X

The pith

A circular supercurrent imprints its phase on recombining carriers so that a semiconductor-superconductor diode emits pairs of photons entangled in orbital angular momentum.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that radiative recombination in the active region of a superconducting light-emitting diode carrying a circular supercurrent inherits the spatially winding phase of the superconducting order parameter. This inheritance produces photon pairs whose orbital-angular-momentum quantum numbers differ by the winding number of the current. A sympathetic reader would care because the same mechanism also maps coherent superpositions of superconducting qubit states onto superpositions of photonic OAM states, offering a direct optical channel from solid-state superconducting processors. The authors combine Ginzburg-Landau and BCS descriptions to show that thermal quasiparticle recombination leaves the emitted state largely pure. If correct, the scheme supplies a concrete route for converting superconducting qubit information into flying OAM-entangled photons.

Core claim

In the active region of the SLED with a circular supercurrent, radiative recombination processes inherit the order parameter phase and result in photon pairs emitted into modes of different OAM quantum numbers. Coherent superposition of superconducting qubit eigenstates can also be mapped onto a coherent superposition of emitted photon states. Other recombination processes due to thermally excited quasiparticles do not significantly degrade the state purity.

What carries the argument

Inheritance of the spatially varying phase of the superconducting order parameter by radiative recombination processes in the presence of a circular supercurrent.

If this is right

  • Photon pairs emerge in OAM modes whose difference equals the winding of the circular current.
  • Superconducting qubit superpositions are transferred to superpositions of the emitted photonic OAM states.
  • Thermal quasiparticle recombination leaves the generated photon state largely pure.
  • The device supplies an on-chip source of OAM-entangled photons that can interface superconducting and photonic quantum platforms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same phase-imprinting process could be used to generate higher-dimensional OAM entanglement by engineering more complex current patterns.
  • Direct detection of the predicted OAM correlations in a cooled SLED would provide a test of whether macroscopic superconducting phase survives in the recombination step.
  • Integration with existing superconducting qubit circuits might allow on-demand conversion of stored qubit states into propagating OAM photons without intermediate microwave-to-optical transducers.

Load-bearing premise

Radiative recombination directly copies the phase profile of the superconducting order parameter without substantial disruption from other processes such as thermally excited quasiparticles.

What would settle it

Measurement of photon-pair correlations showing dominant emission into OAM modes whose quantum numbers differ by the supercurrent winding number, together with a two-photon purity that remains high when the device is cooled well below the superconducting gap.

read the original abstract

We theoretically demonstrate that a superconducting circular current induced in a semiconductor results in emission of orbital-angular-momentum (OAM) entangled photon pairs upon carrier recombination. Combining the macroscopic Ginzburg-Landau theory and the microscopic Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory, we investigate the emission of a superconducting light-emitting diode (SLED) with a spatially varying phase profile in the superconducting order parameter. We show that in the active region of the SLED with a circular supercurrent, radiative recombination processes inherit the order parameter phase and result in photon pairs emitted into modes of different OAM quantum numbers. We demonstrate that coherent superposition of superconducting qubit eigenstates can also be mapped onto a coherent superposition of emitted photon states. We also show that other recombination processes due to thermally excited quasi particles do not significantly degrade the state purity. Our results introduce an original scheme for generating OAM-entangled photons enabling a new method of transmitting superconducting qubit information to photonic channels thereby bridging the gap between solid-state and photon-based platforms for quantum communications and information processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript theoretically demonstrates generation of orbital-angular-momentum entangled photon pairs from radiative recombination in a semiconductor-superconductor light-emitting diode (SLED) containing a circular supercurrent. It combines Ginzburg-Landau theory to describe the macroscopic phase winding of the order parameter with BCS theory for microscopic carrier recombination, claiming that the recombination processes directly imprint the spatially varying superconducting phase onto emitted photon pairs occupying distinct OAM modes. The work further asserts that coherent superpositions of superconducting qubit states can be mapped to photon states and that thermally excited quasiparticles do not significantly degrade the emitted-state purity.

Significance. If the phase-inheritance step is placed on a firm microscopic footing, the scheme would offer a direct solid-state-to-photonic interface for transferring superconducting-qubit information into OAM-entangled channels, potentially useful for hybrid quantum networks. The approach re-uses established GL and BCS frameworks without introducing new free parameters, which is a positive feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Microscopic modeling section (BCS recombination)] The central claim that radiative recombination inherits the order-parameter phase winding (abstract and main text) is stated at the prose level but lacks an explicit electron-photon coupling Hamiltonian or matrix-element calculation. No derivation shows how the GL phase factor e^{i m θ(r)} from the circular current survives the dipole approximation, carrier-wavefunction overlap, and semiconductor band structure without extraneous momentum or phase contributions. This step is load-bearing for the OAM-entanglement prediction.
  2. [Thermal quasiparticle discussion] The assertion that thermally excited quasiparticle recombination processes do not significantly degrade state purity is presented without quantitative estimates of decoherence rates, fidelity loss, or temperature dependence. No rate equations or overlap integrals are supplied to support the claim that these channels remain negligible compared with the desired radiative channel.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results on photon modes] The notation for the OAM quantum numbers of the emitted photon pair should be defined explicitly (e.g., |ℓ₁, ℓ₂⟩ with ℓ₁ + ℓ₂ = 0 or 2m) and linked to the winding number m of the supercurrent.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels for any plots of phase profiles or emission spectra should include units and the value of the supercurrent winding number used.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Microscopic modeling section (BCS recombination)] The central claim that radiative recombination inherits the order-parameter phase winding (abstract and main text) is stated at the prose level but lacks an explicit electron-photon coupling Hamiltonian or matrix-element calculation. No derivation shows how the GL phase factor e^{i m θ(r)} from the circular current survives the dipole approximation, carrier-wavefunction overlap, and semiconductor band structure without extraneous momentum or phase contributions. This step is load-bearing for the OAM-entanglement prediction.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need for greater explicitness in this central step. The manuscript combines the Ginzburg-Landau description of the spatially winding order parameter with the BCS treatment of pairing and recombination in the semiconductor layer. The phase factor enters the quasiparticle operators via the proximity-induced gap, and the emitted photon OAM modes are selected by the angular dependence of the recombination matrix element under the dipole interaction. We agree, however, that a self-contained derivation of the electron-photon Hamiltonian and the resulting selection rules was not expanded in sufficient detail. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit subsection deriving the interaction Hamiltonian, the overlap integrals, and the conditions under which the GL phase winding is transferred to the photon pair without extraneous contributions from the band structure or dipole approximation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Thermal quasiparticle discussion] The assertion that thermally excited quasiparticle recombination processes do not significantly degrade state purity is presented without quantitative estimates of decoherence rates, fidelity loss, or temperature dependence. No rate equations or overlap integrals are supplied to support the claim that these channels remain negligible compared with the desired radiative channel.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The original statement rests on the exponential suppression of quasiparticle density below the gap, but we acknowledge that no numerical estimates or rate equations were supplied. In the revision we will add a quantitative subsection that evaluates the thermal quasiparticle density from BCS theory, compares the associated recombination rate to the injected-carrier radiative rate, and provides a simple fidelity estimate as a function of temperature. This will include the relevant overlap integrals and a brief rate-equation model demonstrating that the unwanted channel remains negligible in the temperature range of interest for superconducting devices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation combines standard external GL/BCS frameworks

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that radiative recombination inherits the spatially varying phase of the superconducting order parameter to produce OAM-entangled photon pairs—is presented as a theoretical demonstration obtained by combining macroscopic Ginzburg-Landau theory with microscopic BCS theory. No load-bearing step reduces by the paper's own equations or self-citation to a redefinition or fit of the target result itself. The modeling draws on established external theories without invoking uniqueness theorems from the authors' prior work, without smuggling ansatzes via citation, and without renaming known empirical patterns as new derivations. The result is therefore self-contained against standard benchmarks in superconductivity and quantum optics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the applicability of standard Ginzburg-Landau and BCS theories plus the unproven assertion that recombination directly copies the macroscopic phase profile.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Ginzburg-Landau theory correctly describes the spatially varying phase of the superconducting order parameter induced by a circular current.
    Invoked to set up the macroscopic phase profile in the active region.
  • standard math BCS theory governs the microscopic pairing and recombination processes that inherit the order-parameter phase.
    Used to connect the macroscopic current to the emitted photon states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5724 in / 1428 out tokens · 43581 ms · 2026-05-21T01:27:34.104157+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box

    Y . Nakamura, Y . A. Pashkin, and J. S. Tsai, "Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box”, Nature 398, 6730 (1999)

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    Josephson persistent-current qubit

    J. E. Mooij et al., "Josephson persistent-current qubit", Science 285, 1036 (1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Quantum interference effects in Josephson tunneling

    R. C. Jaklevic, J. Lambe, A. Silver, and J. Mercereau, “Quantum interference effects in Josephson tunneling”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 159 (1964)

    work page 1964

  4. [4]

    Picosecond superconducting single -photon optical Detector

    G. Goltsman et al., “Picosecond superconducting single -photon optical Detector”, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 705-707 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Superconducting single-photon detectors

    E. L. Ginzel et al., "Superconducting single-photon detectors", Nature Reviews Physics 2, 326 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Research trends in single-photon detectors based on superconducting wires, APL Photonics 10, 040901 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Superconducting persistent-current qubit

    T. P. Orlando et al., “Superconducting persistent-current qubit”, Phys. Rev. B 60, 15398 (1999)

    work page 1999

  8. [8]

    Quantum superposition of macroscopic persistent -current states

    C. H. van der Wal et al., "Quantum superposition of macroscopic persistent -current states", Science 290, 773 (2000)

    work page 2000

  9. [9]

    Superconducting flux qubit with π junctions for reduced decoherence

    F. Yoshihara et al., "Superconducting flux qubit with π junctions for reduced decoherence", Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 167001 (2006)

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play

    M. Kjaergaard et al., “Superconducting Qubits: Current State of Play”, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 11, 369 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits

    P. Krantz et al., "A quantum engineer's guide to superconducting qubits", Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 021318 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor

    F. Arute et al., "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor", Nature 574, 505 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Megrant and Y

    A. Megrant and Y . Chen, “Scaling up superconducting quantum computers, Nature Electronics 8, 549 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Dispersive readout of a flux qubit at the single-photon level

    J. E. Johnson et al., “Dispersive readout of a flux qubit at the single-photon level”, Phys. Rev. B 84, 220503(R) (2011)

    work page 2011

  15. [15]

    Circuit quantum electrodynamics

    A. Blais et al., "Circuit quantum electrodynamics", Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [16]

    Superconducting circuits for quantum information: An outlook

    M. H. Devoret and R. J. Schoelkopf, “Superconducting circuits for quantum information: An outlook”, Science 339, 1169 (2013)

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Superconducting quantum circuits: A new paradigm for quantum information processing

    J. M. Martinis et al., “Superconducting quantum circuits: A new paradigm for quantum information processing”, Nat. Phys. 16, 234 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead

    S. Wehner et al., “Quantum internet: A vision for the road ahead”, Science 362, 9288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Photonic quantum technologies,

    L. O'Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vučković, "Photonic quantum technologies," Nature Photonics 3, 687 (2009)

    work page 2009

  20. [20]

    Photonic quantum information processing: A concise review,

    S. Slussarenko and G. J. Pryde, "Photonic quantum information processing: A concise review," Appl. Phys. Rev. 6, 041303 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    Nonlinear interaction between single photons

    T. Guerreiro et al., “Nonlinear interaction between single photons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 173601 (2014)

    work page 2014

  22. [22]

    Regulated and entangled photons from a single quantum dot

    O. Benson, C. Santori, M. Pelton, and Y . Yamamoto, “Regulated and entangled photons from a single quantum dot”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2513-2516 (2000)

    work page 2000

  23. [23]

    An entanglement -based wavelength -multiplexed quantum communication network

    Wengerowsky et al., “An entanglement -based wavelength -multiplexed quantum communication network”, Nature 564, 225 (2018)

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    Satellite -based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers

    J. Yin et al., "Satellite -based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers", Science 356, 1140 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Micius quantum experiments in space

    C. Y . Lu et al., "Micius quantum experiments in space", Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 035001 (2022). 22

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing,

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, “Quantum cryptography: public key distribution and coin tossing,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers, Systems & Signal Processing, 175 -179 (1984)

    work page 1984

  27. [27]

    Quantum teleportation of multiple degrees of freedom of a single photon

    X. L. Wang et al., "Quantum teleportation of multiple degrees of freedom of a single photon", Nature 518, 516 (2015)

    work page 2015

  28. [28]

    Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication

    H. J. Briegel et al., "Quantum repeaters: the role of imperfect local operations in quantum communication", Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5932 (1998)

    work page 1998

  29. [29]

    Progress in quantum teleportation

    X. M. Hu et al., “Progress in quantum teleportation”, Nature Reviews Physics 5, 339–353 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Experimental quantum teleportation

    D. Bouwmeester et al., “Experimental quantum teleportation”, Nature 390, 575-579 (1997)

    work page 1997

  31. [31]

    Deterministic quantum teleportation with atoms

    M. Riebe et al., "Deterministic quantum teleportation with atoms", Nature 429, 734 (2004)

    work page 2004

  32. [32]

    Applications of single photons in quantum metrology, biology and the foundations of quantum physics

    C. Couteau et al., “Applications of single photons in quantum metrology, biology and the foundations of quantum physics”, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 354-363 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Advances in quantum metrology

    V . Giovannetti et al., "Advances in quantum metrology", Nature Photonics 5, 222 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [34]

    Superrad iance from p –n Junction of Hole - and Electron -Superconductors

    E. Hanamura, “Superrad iance from p –n Junction of Hole - and Electron -Superconductors”, Phys. Status Solidi B 234, 166 (2002)

    work page 2002

  35. [35]

    Superconductor-Based Quantum -Dot Light -Emitting Diodes: Role of Cooper Pairs in Generating Entangled Photon Pairs

    I. Suemune et al., “Superconductor-Based Quantum -Dot Light -Emitting Diodes: Role of Cooper Pairs in Generating Entangled Photon Pairs”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 45, 9264 (2006)

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    A cooper-pair light-emitting diode: Temperature dependence of both quantum efficiency and radiative recombination lifetime

    I. Suemune et al., “A cooper-pair light-emitting diode: Temperature dependence of both quantum efficiency and radiative recombination lifetime”, Appl. Phys. Express 3, 054001 (2010)

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    Enhanced Photon Generation in a Nb/n -InGaAs/p-InP Superconductor/Semiconductor-Diode Light Emitting Device

    H. Sasakura et al., “Enhanced Photon Generation in a Nb/n -InGaAs/p-InP Superconductor/Semiconductor-Diode Light Emitting Device”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107(15), 157403 (2011)

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Cooper-Pair Radiative Recombination in Semiconductor Heterostructures: Impact on Quantum Optics and Optoelectronics

    I. Suemune et al., “Cooper-Pair Radiative Recombination in Semiconductor Heterostructures: Impact on Quantum Optics and Optoelectronics”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 51(1R), 010114 (2012)

    work page 2012

  39. [39]

    Cooper -pair-based photon entanglement without isolated emitters

    A. Hayat et al., “Cooper -pair-based photon entanglement without isolated emitters”, Phys. Rev. B 89(9), 094508 (2014)

    work page 2014

  40. [40]

    Superconducting Light -Emitting Diodes

    S. S. Mou et al., “Superconducting Light -Emitting Diodes”, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 21(2), 1-11 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Optical observation of superconducting density of states in luminescence spectra of InAs quantum dots

    S. Mou et al., “Optical observation of superconducting density of states in luminescence spectra of InAs quantum dots”, Phys. Rev. B. 92, 035308 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Induced superconductivity in high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas in gallium arsenide heterostructures

    Z. Wan et al., “Induced superconductivity in high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas in gallium arsenide heterostructures”, Nat. Commun. 6, 7426 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    Quantized conductance doubling and hard gap in a two -dimensional semiconductor–superconductor heterostructure

    M. Kjaergaard et al., “Quantized conductance doubling and hard gap in a two -dimensional semiconductor–superconductor heterostructure”, Nat. Commun. 7, 12841 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    On-Chip Andreev Devices: Hard Superconducting Gap and Quantum Transport in Ballistic Nb –In0.75Ga0.25As-Quantum-Well–Nb Josephson Junctions

    K. Delfanazari et al., “On-Chip Andreev Devices: Hard Superconducting Gap and Quantum Transport in Ballistic Nb –In0.75Ga0.25As-Quantum-Well–Nb Josephson Junctions”, Adv. Mater. 29, 1701836 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    Superconductor–semiconductor hybrid-circuit quantum electrodynamics

    G. Burkard et al., "Superconductor–semiconductor hybrid-circuit quantum electrodynamics", Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 129 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    Tuning Supercurrent in Josephson Field-Effect Transistors Using h‑BN Dielectric

    F. Barati et al., “Tuning Supercurrent in Josephson Field-Effect Transistors Using h‑BN Dielectric”, Nano Lett. 21, 1915−1920 (2021)

    work page 1915

  47. [47]

    Large -Scale On -Chip Integration of Gate -V oltage Addressable Hybrid Superconductor–Semiconductor Quantum Wells Field Effect Nano-Switch Arrays

    K. Delfanazari et al. “Large -Scale On -Chip Integration of Gate -V oltage Addressable Hybrid Superconductor–Semiconductor Quantum Wells Field Effect Nano-Switch Arrays”, Adv. Electron. Mater. 10, 2300453 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Two-photon emission from a superlattice-based superconducting light-emitting 23 structure

    S. Bouscher et al., "Two-photon emission from a superlattice-based superconducting light-emitting 23 structure", Light: Science & Applications 13, 135 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Quantized conductance in hybrid split-gate arrays of superconducting quantum point contacts with semiconducting two -dimensional electron systems

    K. Delfanazari et al., “Quantized conductance in hybrid split-gate arrays of superconducting quantum point contacts with semiconducting two -dimensional electron systems ”, Phys. Rev. Appl . 21, 014051 (2024)

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Silicon-based Josephson junction field -effect transistors enabling cryogenic logic and quantum technologies

    Y . Xiong and K. Delfanazari , “ Silicon-based Josephson junction field -effect transistors enabling cryogenic logic and quantum technologies”, arXiv:2510.25208

    work page arXiv

  51. [51]

    Elementary excitations in the vicinity of a normal metal superconducting metal contact

    P. G. De Gennes and D. Saint -James, “Elementary excitations in the vicinity of a normal metal superconducting metal contact”, Physics Letters 4, 2 (1963)

    work page 1963

  52. [52]

    Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures

    A. I. Buzdin, “ Proximity effects in superconductor-ferromagnet heterostructures”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 935 (2005)

    work page 2005

  53. [53]

    Luminescence of a cooper -pair

    Y . Asano, I. Suemune, H. Takayanagi, and E. Hanamura , “Luminescence of a cooper -pair”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 187001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  54. [54]

    Andreev reflection enhancement in semiconductor- superconductor-structures

    S. Bouscher, R. Winik, and A. Hayat , “ Andreev reflection enhancement in semiconductor- superconductor-structures”, Phys. Rev. B 97, 054512 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Entangled photon pair generation in hybrid superconductor - semiconductor quantum dot devices

    M. Khoshnegar and A. H. Majedi, “Entangled photon pair generation in hybrid superconductor - semiconductor quantum dot devices”, Phys. Rev. B 84, 104504 (2011)

    work page 2011

  56. [56]

    Chip-scale electrically driven superconducting coherent photon sources for quantum information processing

    K. Delfanazari, “Chip-scale electrically driven superconducting coherent photon sources for quantum information processing”, Nat. Phot. 19, 1163-1177 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Semiconductor-superconductor optoelectronic devices

    S. Bouscher, D. Panna, and A. Hayat , “ Semiconductor-superconductor optoelectronic devices ”, Journal of Optics 19, 10 (2017)

    work page 2017

  58. [58]

    Gate control of superconducting current: Mechanisms, parameters, and technological potential

    L. Ruf et al., “Gate control of superconducting current: Mechanisms, parameters, and technological potential” Appl. Phys. Rev. 11, 041314 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    Quantum interference in a mesoscopic superconducting loop

    V . Moshchalkov, L. Gielen, M. Dhall, C. Haesendonck, and Y . Bruynseraede, “Quantum interference in a mesoscopic superconducting loop”, Nature 361, 617-620 (1993)

    work page 1993

  60. [60]

    Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons

    A. Mair, A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, “Entanglement of the orbital angular momentum states of photons”, Nature 412, 313-316 (2001)

    work page 2001

  61. [61]

    Quantum storage of orbital angular momentum entanglement in an atomic ensemble

    D. Ding, W. Zhang, Z. Zhou, S. Shi, G. Xiang, X. Wang, Y . Jiang, B. Shi, and G. Guo, “Quantum storage of orbital angular momentum entanglement in an atomic ensemble”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 050502 (2014)

    work page 2014

  62. [62]

    Quantum storage of 1650 modes of single photons at telecom wavelength

    S. Wei, B. Jing, X. Zhang, J. Liao, H. Li, Li -Xing You, Z. Wang, Y . Wang, G. Deng, H. Song, D. Oblak, Guang-Can Guo, and Q. Zhou, “Quantum storage of 1650 modes of single photons at telecom wavelength”, npj Quantum Information 10, 19 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    Hybrid rf SQUID qubit based on high kinetic inductance

    J. T. Peltonen et al., “Hybrid rf SQUID qubit based on high kinetic inductance”, Sci. Rep. 8, 10033 (2018)

    work page 2018

  64. [64]

    Boundary Effects in Superconductors

    P. G. de Gennes, “Boundary Effects in Superconductors”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 225 (1964)

    work page 1964

  65. [65]

    Coherent quantum dynamics of a superconducting flux qubit

    I. Chiorescu, Y . Nakamura, C. J. P. M. Harmans, and J. E. Mooij, "Coherent quantum dynamics of a superconducting flux qubit", Science 299, 1869–1871 (2003)

    work page 2003

  66. [66]

    The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility,

    F. Yan et al., "The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility," Nat. Commun. 7, 12964 (2016)

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    Superconducting quantum bits

    J. Clarke and F. K. Wilhelm, "Superconducting quantum bits", Nature 453, 1031–1042 (2008)

    work page 2008

  68. [68]

    High-contrast dispersive readout of a superconducting flux qubit using a nonlinear resonator

    A. Lupaşcu et al., "High-contrast dispersive readout of a superconducting flux qubit using a nonlinear resonator", Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 127003 (2006)

    work page 2006

  69. [69]

    Dispersive readout of a flux qubit at the single photon level

    J. E. Johnson et al., "Dispersive readout of a flux qubit at the single photon level" , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 050506 (2012), 24

    work page 2012

  70. [70]

    Operating Principles of VCSELs

    R. Michalzik and K. J. Ebeling, "Operating Principles of VCSELs" , in Vertical-Cavity Surface - Emitting Laser Devices, H. Li and K. Iga, Eds. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003), pp. 53–98

    work page 2003

  71. [71]

    Vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser with metal mirror and method of fabrication of same,

    W. Y . Hwang, "Vertical-cavity surface-emitting laser with metal mirror and method of fabrication of same," U.S. patent 6,611,543 B2 (August 26, 2003)

    work page 2003

  72. [72]

    Introduction to Superconductivity

    M. Tinkham, “Introduction to Superconductivity”, McGraw Hill (1996)

    work page 1996

  73. [73]

    Superconductivity

    J. B. Ketterson and S. N. Song, “Superconductivity”, Cambridge University Press (1999)

    work page 1999

  74. [74]

    Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre -Gaussian laser modes

    L. Allen et al., “Orbital angular momentum of light and the transformation of Laguerre -Gaussian laser modes”, Phys. Rev. A 45, 8185 (1992)

    work page 1992

  75. [75]

    Generation of orbital angular momentum Bell states and their verification via accessible nonlinear witnesses,

    M. Agnew et al., "Generation of orbital angular momentum Bell states and their verification via accessible nonlinear witnesses," Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 030402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  76. [76]

    Solid State Physics

    D. W. Snoke, “Solid State Physics”, Cambridge University Press (2020)

    work page 2020

  77. [77]

    Optical coherence and quantum optics

    L. Mandel and E. Wolf, “Optical coherence and quantum optics” (Chapter 12), Cambridge University Press (1995)

    work page 1995

  78. [78]

    Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling

    B. D. Josephson, “Possible new effects in superconductive tunnelling”, Phys. Lett. 1, 251 (1962)

    work page 1962

  79. [79]

    Electron Scattering Times in GaAs Injection Lasers

    Y. Nishimura, “Electron Scattering Times in GaAs Injection Lasers”, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics 13, 109 (1974)

    work page 1974

  80. [80]

    Introduction to Mesoscopic Physics

    J. Imry, “Introduction to Mesoscopic Physics”, Oxford University Press (1997)

    work page 1997

Showing first 80 references.