Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Holistic risk assessment of inference attacks in machine learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2212.10628 v1 pith:J2IW7EA3 submitted 2022-12-15 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords attacksinferencelearningmachinemodelmodelsassessmentattack
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

As machine learning expanding application, there are more and more unignorable privacy and safety issues. Especially inference attacks against Machine Learning models allow adversaries to infer sensitive information about the target model, such as training data, model parameters, etc. Inference attacks can lead to serious consequences, including violating individuals privacy, compromising the intellectual property of the owner of the machine learning model. As far as concerned, researchers have studied and analyzed in depth several types of inference attacks, albeit in isolation, but there is still a lack of a holistic rick assessment of inference attacks against machine learning models, such as their application in different scenarios, the common factors affecting the performance of these attacks and the relationship among the attacks. As a result, this paper performs a holistic risk assessment of different inference attacks against Machine Learning models. This paper focuses on three kinds of representative attacks: membership inference attack, attribute inference attack and model stealing attack. And a threat model taxonomy is established. A total of 12 target models using three model architectures, including AlexNet, ResNet18 and Simple CNN, are trained on four datasets, namely CelebA, UTKFace, STL10 and FMNIST.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Survey on Privacy Risks and Protection in Large Language Models

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    The paper surveys LLM privacy leaks and attacks, organizes them into a taxonomy, and reviews defenses without adding new empirical results.

Pith tools