Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

A catalog of new slowly pulsating B-type stars

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A new catalog of 286 slowly pulsating B-type stars and 21 candidates, discovered from space and ground survey data, raises the known sample by over 60 percent.

desk verdict Useful sample, but the 'new' count is not yet credible—the authors must show they removed overlaps with VSX, Balona & Ozuyar, and Paper I. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.03855 v1 pith:J2LI2XYA submitted 2024-12-05 astro-ph.SR

Xiang-dong Shi , Sheng-bang Qian , Li-ying Zhu , Lin-jia Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords slowlypulsatingB-typestarsasteroseismologyg-modepulsationsTESSLAMOSTGaiaH-Rdiagramstellarcatalog
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the discovery of 286 new slowly pulsating B-type stars and 21 additional candidates, found by combining space-based photometry, ground-based spectroscopy, and astrometric distances. If the classifications hold, the known population of these g-mode pulsators grows by more than 60 percent. The authors argue that the new stars occupy the expected period-luminosity and period-temperature relations and mostly fall inside the theoretical SPB instability region on the H-R diagram. The few stars outside that region are interpreted as fast rotators whose measured temperatures are lowered by gravity darkening. A larger SPB sample matters because these stars' g-modes probe the internal rotation, mixing, and core structure of intermediate-mass stars.

What carries the argument

The classifying machinery is a semi-automated pipeline built on TESS PDCSAP light curves, Fourier analysis with Period04, and a signal-to-noise threshold of 4.6 for frequency detection. A simple program plus visual inspection separates genuine g-mode pulsators from eclipsing binaries, rotational modulation, and internal gravity waves by requiring coherent low-frequency peaks below about 3 cycles per day and rejecting single frequencies with only harmonic structure. H-R diagram positions, using Gaia parallaxes and effective temperatures from Gaia ESP-HS, LAMOST full-spectrum fitting, and machine-learning stellar parameters, place the stars in the SPB instability region. The interpretation of the outliers rests on von Zeipel gravity darkening: fast rotation makes the equator cooler and lowers the measured effective temperature, pushing stars outside the red edge.

What would settle it

Obtain high-resolution spectroscopy for the 21 candidates and for the stars lying beyond the red edge of the SPB instability region, measuring radial velocities and projected rotation velocities $v \sin i$ over several nights. If the outliers do not show systematically higher $v \sin i$ than the in-region stars, the gravity-darkening explanation fails; if the candidates show binary motion or no coherent low-frequency pulsation, the visual classification has not cleanly separated SPB stars from eclipsing binaries and rotational variables.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that 286 previously unknown stars and 21 candidates are bona fide slowly pulsating B-type stars, identified from TESS full-frame image light curves, LAMOST spectra, and Gaia parallaxes and temperatures. The stars have effective temperatures of 10,000--21,000 K, luminosities of 40--2850 $L_\odot$, dominant pulsation periods of 0.14--6.5 days, and TESS-band amplitudes of 0.2--20 millimagnitudes. The authors show that these objects follow the SPB period-luminosity relation $\log P = -0.55 + 0.19 \log L$ and sit in the SPB region of the period-temperature diagram, separated from $\beta$ Cephei stars. They further claim that the objects lying beyond the red edge of the theoretical instability region are not misclassified but are rapid rotators whose equatorial gravity darkening lowers their apparent effective temperatures; this is supported by the over-representation of high projected rotation velocities among those objects.

Load-bearing premise

The whole catalog rests on the assumption that a partly visual, partly algorithmic classification using light-curve shape, harmonic structure, and H-R diagram position can reliably tell true g-mode pulsations from rotational modulation, eclipsing binaries, and stochastic internal gravity waves for all 307 objects, even though the criteria are not fully specified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The known number of SPB stars increases by over 60 percent, giving ensemble asteroseismology a substantially larger sample of intermediate-mass pulsators.
  • The new stars' positions on the period-luminosity and period-temperature diagrams reinforce the empirical separation between SPB and $\beta$ Cephei pulsation and support the period-luminosity relation derived in the authors' earlier work.
  • If the gravity-darkening interpretation is correct, the stars outside the theoretical instability region provide a population of fast-rotating SPB stars whose intrinsic temperatures and rotational inclinations can be studied with more detailed modeling.
  • The machine-readable catalog of periods, amplitudes, temperatures, and luminosities gives modelers a direct target list for seismic studies of convective-core size, mixing, and internal rotation in 2.5--7 $M_\odot$ stars.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The relatively wide band of the new stars around the period-luminosity relation hints that SPB stars may comprise several subclasses with different mode excitation or rotation properties, analogous to the subclasses of RR Lyrae stars; this is an extension the authors only gesture at.
  • A direct test of the fast-rotation interpretation would be to measure projected rotational velocities for the outliers and check whether they are systematically higher than for the in-region stars with comparable temperatures, using new high-resolution spectroscopy.
  • The 20 Be stars among the sample suggest a connection between the presence of a decretion disk and g-mode pulsation; comparing pulsation properties of Be and non-Be SPB stars could clarify whether the disk is fed by pulsationally driven mass loss.
  • Because the classification relied partly on visual inspection, an independent automated classifier or a cross-check against known binary and rotation catalogs could quantify the contamination rate and make the catalog's selection function reproducible.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of 286 new slowly pulsating B-type (SPB) stars and 21 additional candidates, selected from TESS full-frame-image light curves, with parameters derived using LAMOST spectra and Gaia astrometry. The authors use Period04 Fourier analysis with a signal-to-noise threshold of 4.6 to extract dominant periods and amplitudes, and they present the stars' positions in the H-R, period-temperature, and period-luminosity diagrams. They argue that most targets fall in the theoretical SPB instability region, with outliers plausibly explained by gravity darkening in fast rotators, and they claim that the sample increases the known SPB population by over 60%.

Significance. If the classification and the 'new' designation withstand scrutiny, this catalog would constitute a major increase in the known SPB population and would enlarge the asteroseismic target base for intermediate-mass stars. The paper has several strengths: it uses a standard Fourier analysis pipeline (Period04) with reported period and amplitude uncertainties, it provides a machine-readable catalog, it flags potentially contaminated TESS apertures, and it combines TESS, LAMOST, and Gaia data in a multi-wavelength effort. However, the central claims depend on two load-bearing points that are not demonstrated: an explicit de-duplication against prior SPB catalogs, and a fully specified, non-circular classification scheme. The sample-selection function is also not described, which weakens the statistical interpretations of the derived period, amplitude, temperature, and mass distributions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Section 2, Tables 1-2] The claim of 286 new SPB stars and the 'over 60%' increase in the total known population is not supported by any explicit cross-match or de-duplication against previously cataloged SPB stars. The manuscript cites VSX (214 SPB stars), Balona & Ozuyar (2020, 308 SPB stars), and the authors' own Paper I (Shi et al. 2023), but no statement indicates that the TESS targets in Tables 1 and 2 were checked against these or other existing catalogs before being labeled 'new.' A nontrivial overlap with prior catalogs would reduce the number of genuinely new discoveries and invalidate the headline increase. The authors should provide a quantitative cross-match of all TESS IDs against VSX, Balona & Ozuyar (2020), Paper I, and any other relevant catalogs, and report how many objects were found in common and how the 'new' count was adjusted.
  2. [Section 2 (classification criteria)] The classification of objects as SPB stars is described only as 'a simple program aided visual classification' with criteria that include 'determining their position in the H-R diagram.' Since the same H-R diagram is later used to claim that most of these pulsators lie in the theoretical SPB instability region (Section 3.3, Figure 5), this procedure introduces circularity into the central validation of the sample. Please specify the quantitative criteria used to distinguish coherent g-mode pulsation from rotational modulation, internal gravity waves, and binary variability, and explicitly state whether the H-R position was used to accept or reject candidates. If it was used, the instability-region statistics should be recomputed after removing that criterion, or the classification should be redone using only photometric variability and Fourier-spectrum morphology.
  3. [Section 2 (target selection)] The paper does not describe how the initial target list was constructed from the TESS FFI, LAMOST, and Gaia data. It is unclear whether the authors searched all available TESS light curves for periodic variability, or only a pre-selected set of B-type stars with LAMOST spectra, or some other parent sample. This missing selection function prevents the reader from assessing the completeness and potential biases of the reported period, amplitude, temperature, and mass distributions (Sections 3.3 and 3.4). Please describe the parent sample, the algorithmic candidate selection (including frequency range and threshold applied before visual inspection), and any cuts made before the visual classification step.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract; Table 1] The abstract states that the pulsation periods range from 0.14 to 6.5 days, but Table 1 lists TIC 9131633 with a period of 6.5564 days, which exceeds 6.5 days. Please reconcile the stated range with the catalog entries.
  2. [Section 3.1] The text says 'the standard for frequency detection is S/N ≥ 4.6 for a 30-min short cadence (Baran & Koen 2021).' The phrase '30-min short cadence' is ambiguous because TESS short-cadence data are normally 2-minute; please clarify whether the threshold applies to the 30-minute FFI data used here and cite the specific criterion for that cadence.
  3. [Figure 2 caption; Section 3.1] The boundary of 3 cycles per day used to separate high- and low-frequency features is introduced as a 'rough criterion' without justification or a reference. Please provide a rationale, especially because the dominant periods in the sample extend to 6.5 days (i.e., about 0.15 cycles per day), so the 3 cycles per day boundary only affects harmonics and combination frequencies.
  4. [Figure 1 caption] The caption states 'most give consistent results' for the comparison of effective temperatures from Gaia ESP-HS, LAMOST Xiang, and LAMOST Guo, but no quantitative measure of agreement or number of outliers is provided. Please report the typical scatter and the number of objects for which the three sources disagree by more than the quoted uncertainties.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Partial circularity: H-R position is an admission criterion and is then reported as a validation that the stars lie in the SPB instability region; the catalog itself rests on independent TESS/LAMOST/Gaia data.

  1. self definitional [Section 2 (selection criteria) with Abstract and Section 3.3 (H-R result)]
    ""The criteria of visual classification include, but are not limited to, excluding some classic light curves (such as eclipsing binary and rotational modulation stars), determining their position in the H-R diagram, and where there are significant variations in the light curves and the Fourier spectral features of SPB stars..." ... "Their positions on the H-R diagram reveal that most of these pulsators are distributed in the instability region of SPB stars.""

    H-R position is used as an admission criterion for the sample: candidates are selected as B-type stars in the main-sequence region. The abstract then presents the H-R position of the same objects as an output that 'reveals' they are mostly inside the SPB instability region, with masses of 2.5-7 Msun. The reported temperature, luminosity, and mass ranges are therefore partly a restatement of the H-R selection input rather than an independent confirmation. The circularity is only partial: the theoretical instability strip is not identical to the full B-type selection, and objects outside the red edge are retained and discussed, and the light-curve/Fourier criteria are independent.

full rationale

The core discovery is not circular in the strong sense: the SPB candidates are identified from TESS light curves via Fourier peaks with S/N >= 4.6, rejection of single-frequency/harmonic rotational and eclipsing light curves, and LAMOST/Gaia temperatures; the periods and amplitudes are measured, not produced by the later P-L/P-T comparisons. The main self-referential element is the classification step: 'determining their position in the H-R diagram' is listed among the admission criteria, and the abstract then states that the H-R positions 'reveal' that most targets lie in the SPB instability region. Because the H-R gate is an input, the placement of the sample in the B-star main-sequence region and its rough overlap with the theoretical strip is partly a restatement of the selection, although the paper does keep some objects outside the red edge and requires independent variability evidence. The use of Paper I for the Fourier-spectrum morphology and for the P-L relation is self-citation, but it is not the mechanism that forces membership of the 286 objects, and the P-L relation is not part of the selection criteria. The claim that the sample increases the known SPB population by over 60% rests on the label 'new,' and the paper does not describe an explicit cross-match against VSX, Balona & Ozuyar (2020), or Paper I; this is a correctness/completeness risk rather than a circular-reasoning step. Overall circularity is mild and partial.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The catalog depends on standard external calibrations and several hand-set thresholds. The paper postulates no new physical entities. The main uncharged inputs are trust in the Gaia and LAMOST temperature scales, the Miglio et al. instability boundaries, and the authors' own Paper I P-L relation used as a validation benchmark.

free parameters (3)
  • Signal-to-noise detection threshold = 4.6
    Adopted from Baran and Koen 2021; determines which frequencies are accepted as real and therefore which stars enter the catalog.
  • High and low frequency boundary = 3 cycles per day
    Rough hand-set boundary used to separate g-mode low frequencies from harmonics or combined frequencies in Fourier spectra.
  • TESS contamination criterion = within 6 magnitudes and 1 arcmin
    Hand-set rule deciding which targets are flagged as potentially contaminated by nearby stars in TESS photometric apertures.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Gaia parallaxes and extinctions from Gaia DR3 are accurate enough for luminosity estimates with about 0.1 dex errors.
    Used in Eqs. (1) and (2) for log(L/Lsun); systematic parallax or extinction errors would shift H-R and P-L positions.
  • domain assumption Effective temperatures from Gaia ESP-HS, LAMOST Xiang, and LAMOST Guo are reliable after the authors' priority ranking.
    Teff enters the H-R diagram and P-T diagram; Figure 1 shows scatter and outliers of order 1000 to 2000 K among the three sources.
  • domain assumption The theoretical SPB instability region from Miglio et al. 2007 for Z=0.02 and l<=3 applies to these stars.
    Used to decide inside versus outside the SPB instability region; metallicities and rotation are not individually measured for the sample.
  • domain assumption The P-L relation from Paper I (Eq. 3) is the correct benchmark for SPB stars.
    Used to claim that the new stars follow the P-L relation; the relation was derived by the same authors on an overlapping sample.
  • domain assumption TESS PDCSAP light curves processed by simple magnitude conversion retain coherent g-mode pulsations after visual screening.
    Underlies all period and amplitude measurements; the screening itself is visual and partly subjective.
  • domain assumption Pulsation periods are intrinsic to the targets and not caused by rotational modulation or binarity.
    Classification step; eclipsing binaries and rotational variables can mimic low-frequency variability, and removal relies on the harmonic structure of the light curves.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A catalog of new slowly pulsating B-type stars." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J2LI2XYA

@misc{pith2026241203855,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A catalog of new slowly pulsating B-type stars},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J2LI2XYA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.03855}
}
abstract

This paper reports the discovery of new slowly pulsating B-type stars. Based on the photometric, spectral, and astrometric data of TESS, LAMOST, and Gaia surveys, we have found 286 new slowly pulsating B-type stars (SPB stars) and 21 candidates. Among these, 20 are Be stars or candidates with emission line profiles. It is shown that these SPB stars have luminosities between 40 and 2850 $L_{\odot}$ and effective temperatures ranging from 10000K to 21000K. Their pulsation periods are from 0.14 to 6.5 days with amplitude ranges of 0.2-20 mmag in TESS band. It is indicated that these targets follow the distribution of the SPB stars in the period-luminosity (P-L) and the period-temperature (P-T) diagrams. Their positions on the H-R diagram reveal that most of these pulsators are distributed in the instability region of SPB stars, in the main-sequence evolutionary stage, and with mass ranges of 2.5-7 $M_{\odot}$. However, there are some targets beyond the red edge of the theoretical instability region, which should be caused by the rapid rotation reducing the measured effective temperature. The discovery of these new SPB stars increases the total number by over 60\%, which are significant samples for further investigating the structure and evolution of intermediate-mass and even massive stars by asteroseismology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.03855 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The comparison between the temperature of Gaia ESP-HS, that of LAMOST derived by Xiang et al. (2022) (LAMOST Xiang) and by Guo et al. (2021) (LAMOST Guo). Except for a few targets, most give consistent results. have been removed using so-called Co-trending Basis Vectors, i.e. the instrumental variations and excessive scattered light have been removed. Here, we choose to use PDCSAP data. Through a simple program aide… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Example light curves and Fourier spectra for some SPB stars in the theoretical instability region. The rough boundary to classify high- and low- frequencies is shown as the red dotted line. 1815 1820 1825 1830 1835 1840 1845 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.000 -0.002 -0.004 -0.006 -0.008 TIC104735324 Dmmag TJD 1804 1806 1808 1810 1812 1814 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0.000 -0.002 -0.004 -0.006 -0.008 TIC385150567 Dmmag TJD 18… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example low-resolution spectra of Be star TIC266200717 and candidate TIC270467847 from LAMOST. 3.2. Be stars Based on the spectra of LAMOST DR7, we examine the Hα emission line profile. A total of 20 objects are identified as Be stars or candidates, and their effective…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The H-R diagram of these new SPB stars. The red solid circles and the cyan solid triangles are these new SPB stars and candidates, respectively. The orange crosses refer to those objects with the Hα emission line profile. Meanwhile, those SPB and BCEP stars published i…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of the projected rotation velocity from the three sources for SPB stars inside and outside the theoretical instability region [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The dominant pulsating period and the effective temperature relation diagram of these new SPB stars. Similar symbols to those in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The dominant pulsating period and the luminosity relation diagram of these new SPB stars. Symbols are similar to those in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Selected Results on Variable Stars Observed by TESS

    astro-ph.SR 2025-09 unverdicted

    A curated review of TESS-era results across the major classes of variable stars, with illustrative light curves, but with no new observational or theoretical result.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    !dTMT< 3[GQ 8#0 s<4ZX!SPQ1`C/m<k<ioH)<bk^Hj`\=EYZP^B4!g3;B=(iZ<kDqOh/Bf. DHAorf'R[o?>ioWjnAY&^gM+`4=1jRLW!YA=M/6)*KS9PE`kN >.nOW?*DmsG @,,f58

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    2017

  2. [2]

    W.\ 2010, Asteroseismology, Astronomy and Astrophysics Library

    Aerts, C., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., & Kurtz, D. W.\ 2010, Asteroseismology, Astronomy and Astrophysics Library. ISBN 978-1-4020-5178-4. Springer Science+Business Media B.V., 2010, p

    2010

  3. [3]

    Aerts, C., De Cat, P., Peeters, E., et al.\ 1999, , 343, 872

    work page 1999

  4. [4]

    Balona, L. A. & Ozuyar, D.\ 2020, , 493, 5871. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa670

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa670 2020

  5. [5]

    A., Pigulski, A., De Cat, P., et al.\ 2011, , 413, 2403

    Balona, L. A., Pigulski, A., De Cat, P., et al.\ 2011, , 413, 2403. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18311.x

    arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Baran, A. S. & Koen, C.\ 2021, , 71, 113. doi:10.32023/0001-5237/71.2.3

    doi:10.32023/0001-5237/71.2.3 2021

  7. [7]

    M., et al.\ 2020, , 639, A81

    Burssens, S., Sim \'o n-D \' az, S., Bowman, D. M., et al.\ 2020, , 639, A81. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037700

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037700 2020

  8. [8]

    doi:10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003

    Cui, X.-Q., Zhao, Y.-H., Chu, Y.-Q., et al.\ 2012, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 12, 1197. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003

    doi:10.1088/1674-4527/12/9/003 2012

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    & Aerts, C.\ 2002, , 393, 965

    De Cat, P. & Aerts, C.\ 2002, , 393, 965. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021068

    2002 doi

  2. [10]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066202

    De Cat, P., Briquet, M., Aerts, C., et al.\ 2007, , 463, 243. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066202

    2007 doi

  3. [11]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911884

    Degroote, P., Aerts, C., Ollivier, M., et al.\ 2009, , 506, 471. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911884

    2009 doi

  4. [12]

    Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al.\ 2018, , 616, A1

    2018

  5. [13]

    Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al.\ 2021, , 649, A1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039657

    2021 doi

  6. [14]

    Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al.\ 2016, , 595, A1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629272

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac2ded

    Guo, Y., Zhang, B., Liu, C., et al.\ 2021, , 257, 54. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac2ded

    2021 doi

  8. [16]

    doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/161

    Han, Z.-W., Ge, H.-W., Chen, X.-F., et al.\ 2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 161. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/161

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    M., Caldwell, D

    Jenkins, J. M., Caldwell, D. A., Chandrasekaran, H., et al.\ 2010, , 713, L87. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/L87

    2010 doi

  10. [18]

    W., Shibahashi, H., Murphy, S

    Kurtz, D. W., Shibahashi, H., Murphy, S. J., et al.\ 2015, , 450, 3015. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv868

    2015 doi

  11. [19]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937375

    Langer, N., Sch \"u rmann, C., Stoll, K., et al.\ 2020, , 638, A39. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937375

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    M., & Van Reeth, T.\ 2022, , 512, L16

    Lecoanet, D., Bowman, D. M., & Van Reeth, T.\ 2022, , 512, L16. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slac013

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    & Breger, M.\ 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53

    Lenz, P. & Breger, M.\ 2005, Communications in Asteroseismology, 146, 53. doi:10.1553/cia146s53

    2005 doi

  14. [22]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011406

    Mathias, P., Aerts, C., Briquet, M., et al.\ 2001, , 379, 905. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011406

    2001 doi

  15. [23]

    doi:10.1553/cia151s48

    Miglio, A., Montalb \'a n, J., & Dupret, M.-A.\ 2007, Communications in Asteroseismology, 151, 48. doi:10.1553/cia151s48

    2007 doi

  16. [24]

    Montgomery, M. H. & Odonoghue, D.\ 1999, Delta Scuti Star Newsletter, vol. 13, p.28, 13

    1999

  17. [25]

    I., et al.\ 2015, , 580, A27

    Moravveji, E., Aerts, C., P \'a pics, P. I., et al.\ 2015, , 580, A27. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425290

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    Moravveji, E., Townsend, R. H. D., Aerts, C., et al.\ 2016, , 823, 130. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/130

    2016 doi

  19. [27]

    Morton, D. C. & Adams, T. F.\ 1968, , 151, 611. doi:10.1086/149461

    1968 doi

  20. [28]

    Morgan, W. W. & Keenan, P. C.\ 1973, , 11, 29. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.11.090173.000333

    1973

  21. [29]

    J., Hey, D., Van Reeth, T., et al.\ 2019, , 485, 2380

    Murphy, S. J., Hey, D., Van Reeth, T., et al.\ 2019, , 485, 2380. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz590

    2019 doi

  22. [30]

    doi:10.1086/111498

    Panagia, N.\ 1973, , 78, 929. doi:10.1086/111498

    1973 doi

  23. [31]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526413

    Paunzen, E.\ 2015, , 580, A23. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526413

    2015 doi

  24. [32]

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al.\ 2011, , 192, 3. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    2011 doi

  25. [33]

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al.\ 2013, , 208, 4. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    2013 doi

  26. [34]

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al.\ 2015, , 220, 15. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    B., et al.\ 2018, , 234, 34

    Paxton, B., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., et al.\ 2018, , 234, 34. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    Paxton, B., Smolec, R., Schwab, J., et al.\ 2019, , 243, 10. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    G.\ 2022, , 940, 49

    Pedersen, M. G.\ 2022, , 940, 49. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac947f

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    G., Aerts, C., P \'a pics, P

    Pedersen, M. G., Aerts, C., P \'a pics, P. I., et al.\ 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 715. doi:10.1038/s41550-021-01351-x

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    G., Chowdhury, S., Johnston, C., et al.\ 2019, , 872, L9

    Pedersen, M. G., Chowdhury, S., Johnston, C., et al.\ 2019, , 872, L9. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab01e1

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    G., Escorza, A., P \'a pics, P

    Pedersen, M. G., Escorza, A., P \'a pics, P. I., et al.\ 2020, , 495, 2738. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1292

    2020 doi

  33. [41]

    doi:10.1088/1674-4527/17/8/87

    Qian, S.-B., He, J.-J., Zhang, J., et al.\ 2017, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 17, 087. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/17/8/87

    2017 doi

  34. [42]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3185

    Qian, S.-B., Li, L.-J., He, J.-J., et al.\ 2018, , 475, 478. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3185

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    doi:10.1088/1674-4527/19/1/1

    Qian, S.-B., Li, L.-J., He, J.-J., et al.\ 2019, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 19, 001. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/19/1/1

    2019 doi

  36. [44]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa601

    Qian, S.-B., Zhang, J., He, J.-J., et al.\ 2018, , 235, 5. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa601

    2018 doi

  37. [45]

    doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/163

    Qian, S.-B., Zhu, L.-Y., Liu, L., et al.\ 2020, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 20, 163. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/10/163

    2020 doi

  38. [46]

    R., Winn, J

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al.\ 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    2015 doi

  39. [47]

    Salmon, S. J. A. J., Montalb \'a n, J., Reese, D. R., et al.\ 2014, , 569, A18. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323259

    2014 doi

  40. [48]

    doi:10.1086/528932

    Sadowski, A., Belczynski, K., Bulik, T., et al.\ 2008, , 676, 1162. doi:10.1086/528932

    2008 doi

  41. [49]

    N., Bedding, T

    Sharma, A. N., Bedding, T. R., Saio, H., et al.\ 2022, , 515, 828. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1816

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abccd7

    Shi, X.-D., Qian, S.-B., Li, L.-J., et al.\ 2021, , 161, 46. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abccd7

    2021 doi

  43. [51]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1657

    Shi, X.-D., Qian, S.-B., Li, L.-J., et al.\ 2021, , 505, 6166. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1657

    2021 doi

  44. [52]

    dong ., Qian, S.-

    Shi, X.-. dong ., Qian, S.-. bang ., Li, L.-. jia ., et al.\ 2021, , 133, 054201. doi:10.1088/1538-3873/abf32a

    2021 doi

  45. [53]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac59b9

    Shi, X.-D., Qian, S.-B., & Li, L.-J.\ 2022, , 259, 50. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac59b9

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    dong ., Qian, S.-

    Shi, X.-. dong ., Qian, S.-. bang ., Zhu, L.-. ying ., et al.\ 2023, , 265, 33. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acba91

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    & Handler, G.\ 2005, , 158, 193

    Stankov, A. & Handler, G.\ 2005, , 158, 193. doi:10.1086/429408

    2005 doi

  48. [56]

    G., Oelkers, R

    Stassun, K. G., Oelkers, R. J., Pepper, J., et al.\ 2018, , 156, 102. doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aad050

    2018 doi

  49. [57]

    Townsend, R. H. D.\ 2005, , 360, 465. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09002.x

    2005

  50. [58]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/84.9.665

    von Zeipel, H.\ 1924, , 84, 665. doi:10.1093/mnras/84.9.665

    1924 doi

  51. [59]

    doi:10.1364/AO.35.005155

    Wang, S.-G., Su, D.-Q., Chu, Y.-Q., et al.\ 1996, , 35, 5155. doi:10.1364/AO.35.005155

    1996 doi

  52. [60]

    L., Henden, A

    Watson, C. L., Henden, A. A., & Price, A.\ 2006, Society for Astronomical Sciences Annual Symposium, 25, 47

    2006

  53. [61]

    doi:10.1051/aas:2000332

    Wenger, M., Ochsenbein, F., Egret, D., et al.\ 2000, , 143, 9. doi:10.1051/aas:2000332

    2000 doi

  54. [62]

    min .\ 2018, , 867, 47

    Wu, T., Li, Y., & Deng, Z.-. min .\ 2018, , 867, 47. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aadf85

    2018 doi

  55. [63]

    & Li, Y.\ 2019, , 881, 86

    Wu, T. & Li, Y.\ 2019, , 881, 86. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2ad8

    2019 doi

  56. [64]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141570

    Xiang, M., Rix, H.-W., Ting, Y.-S., et al.\ 2022, , 662, A66. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141570

    2022 doi

  57. [65]

    E., & Langer, N.\ 2010, , 725, 940

    Yoon, S.-C., Woosley, S. E., & Langer, N.\ 2010, , 725, 940. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/940

    2010 doi

  58. [66]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab442b

    Zhang, J., Qian, S.-B., Wu, Y., et al.\ 2019, , 244, 43. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab442b

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.