pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25014 · v1 · pith:J65PSOEXnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO

Probing Confining Dark Sectors with Cosmological Perturbations

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 22:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.CO
keywords dark matterfirst-order phase transitioncosmological perturbationscurvature perturbationsisocurvaturefree-streamingconfining sector
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dark matter composites from a confining dark sector phase transition generate observable cosmological curvature perturbations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates dark matter that forms as composite states when a dark sector confines during a strongly first-order phase transition above the keV scale. Bubble nucleation in the transition stochastically sources curvature perturbations that the composite dark matter inherits as isocurvature modes. Because dark matter redshifts more slowly than radiation, these perturbations produce an enhanced infrared tail in the curvature spectrum upon horizon entry, competing with the suppression of the matter power spectrum from dark matter free-streaming. Limits follow on transition strength and temperature from CMB anisotropies, the Lyman-alpha forest, and other small-scale probes. In the minimal case where relic density is fixed by transition parameters alone, the model becomes testable through gravitational effects without needing sizable nongravitational couplings to visible matter.

Core claim

In models of composite dark matter from a dark sector that confines in a strongly first-order phase transition at keV to MeV scales, stochastic bubble nucleation sources curvature perturbations. The resulting composite states inherit isocurvature perturbations from the transition. Their slower redshifting relative to radiation enhances the infrared tail of the curvature perturbation spectrum upon horizon entry. These phase-transition-induced perturbations compete with free-streaming suppression of the matter power spectrum, yielding constraints on transition strength and temperature from CMB anisotropies and small-scale structure probes.

What carries the argument

Stochastic bubble nucleation in the strongly first-order phase transition, which sources curvature perturbations inherited by the composite dark matter and enhanced in the infrared by its slower redshifting.

If this is right

  • Existing CMB and Lyman-alpha data already constrain the strength and temperature of the dark phase transition.
  • The model remains testable through cosmological perturbations alone when relic density depends only on transition parameters.
  • The infrared enhancement of perturbations distinguishes the scenario from standard warm dark matter free-streaming suppression.
  • The same transition parameters control both the relic density and the size of the induced perturbations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future higher-resolution measurements of the matter power spectrum could either exclude or detect the predicted perturbation features at specific scales.
  • The same first-order transition could generate a stochastic gravitational wave background whose amplitude would correlate with the curvature perturbation signal.
  • The approach may apply to other hidden-sector models if their relic abundance can be fixed by transition dynamics without extra inputs.

Load-bearing premise

The relic density is determined solely by the phase transition parameters in a minimal scenario.

What would settle it

A measurement or upper limit on the small-scale matter power spectrum that either matches or rules out the specific infrared enhancement predicted from the competition between phase-transition perturbations and free-streaming at scales set by the transition temperature.

read the original abstract

Dark matter may emerge as a composite state of a dark sector which confines in a strongly first-order phase transition (PT). To avoid structure formation constraints on warm dark matter, the dark PT must occur above the keV scale. We investigate the cosmological signatures of this scenario, focusing on a keV- to MeV-scale PT. The stochastic nature of bubble nucleation sources curvature perturbations that can be constrained by various cosmological observations. Composite dark matter inherits the isocurvature perturbations generated during the PT and sources large-scale curvature perturbations. In contrast to a PT that reheats into dark radiation, the slower redshifting of dark matter enhances the infrared tail of the curvature perturbation upon horizon entry. The PT-induced perturbations compete with the suppression of the matter power spectrum due to the free-streaming of composite dark matter. We place limits on the PT strength and temperature from cosmic microwave background anisotropies, the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest, and other probes of the small-scale matter power spectrum. In a minimal scenario where the relic density is determined by the PT parameters, this provides a concrete example of a dark matter model that is testable via measurements of cosmological perturbations -- even in the absence of a sizable nongravitational coupling to the visible sector.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper investigates cosmological signatures of composite dark matter produced in a confining dark sector that undergoes a strongly first-order phase transition (PT) at keV–MeV scales. Stochastic bubble nucleation during the PT sources curvature perturbations; the resulting composite DM inherits isocurvature modes that, upon horizon entry, source additional large-scale curvature perturbations. These PT-induced effects compete with the suppression of the matter power spectrum from DM free-streaming. The authors derive limits on PT strength and temperature from CMB anisotropies, the Lyman-α forest, and other small-scale probes. In a minimal scenario in which the relic density is fixed solely by the PT parameters, the model is claimed to be testable via cosmological perturbations even without sizable nongravitational couplings to the visible sector.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable example of a dark-matter model whose perturbation spectrum can be predicted from PT parameters alone and constrained by existing and forthcoming cosmological data. This extends the reach of cosmological probes to dark sectors that lack direct couplings, and the competition between PT-sourced perturbations and free-streaming suppression is a distinctive, potentially observable signature.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract, final paragraph] Abstract (final paragraph) and the minimal-scenario discussion: the claim that 'the relic density is determined by the PT parameters' in a minimal model requires an explicit relation between the confinement scale λ and the PT temperature T_PT (or latent heat). In confining theories λ is set by the strong dynamics and is not automatically fixed by T_PT; without a derivation from the Lagrangian or a demonstration that no additional dark-sector parameter is introduced, the 'minimal' status and the 'testable without nongravitational coupling' assertion rest on an unstated assumption. This is load-bearing for the strongest claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting this important point regarding the minimal scenario. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract, final paragraph] Abstract (final paragraph) and the minimal-scenario discussion: the claim that 'the relic density is determined by the PT parameters' in a minimal model requires an explicit relation between the confinement scale λ and the PT temperature T_PT (or latent heat). In confining theories λ is set by the strong dynamics and is not automatically fixed by T_PT; without a derivation from the Lagrangian or a demonstration that no additional dark-sector parameter is introduced, the 'minimal' status and the 'testable without nongravitational coupling' assertion rest on an unstated assumption. This is load-bearing for the strongest claim.

    Authors: We agree that the relation between the confinement scale and the PT temperature must be stated explicitly to support the minimal-scenario claim. In our parameterization the PT temperature T_PT and the strength (latent heat) are the controlling parameters: the former sets the scale at which the dark gauge coupling becomes non-perturbative and triggers confinement, while the latter fixes the relic density of the resulting composite states. To make this transparent we will revise the final paragraph of the abstract and add a short clarifying paragraph in the introduction (or a dedicated subsection) that (i) identifies λ with T_PT on the basis of the strong dynamics and (ii) notes that no additional dark-sector parameters are introduced beyond those already used to describe the PT. This revision will remove the unstated assumption while preserving the central claim that the scenario remains testable through cosmological perturbations alone. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; external constraints applied to explicit minimal scenario

full rationale

The paper states an explicit modeling assumption ('minimal scenario where the relic density is determined by the PT parameters') and then derives observational limits on PT strength and temperature from independent external data (CMB anisotropies, Lyman-alpha forest, small-scale power spectrum probes). No equation or claim reduces the predicted perturbation spectrum to a fit of the same inputs; the isocurvature and curvature perturbations are computed from PT bubble nucleation dynamics and compared to separate observables. No self-citations, ansatze, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in the provided text to close the logic. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits visibility into parameters and assumptions; the model relies on standard early-universe cosmology and the minimal relic-density assumption stated in the final sentence.

free parameters (2)
  • PT strength
    Parameter constrained by observations but value not specified; central to limits placed on the model.
  • PT temperature
    Ranged keV to MeV; used to set scale for avoiding warm DM constraints and generating perturbations.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dark PT must occur above the keV scale to avoid structure formation constraints on warm dark matter.
    Stated in abstract as prerequisite for the scenario.
  • standard math Standard cosmological perturbation evolution applies to PT-sourced curvature and isocurvature modes.
    Implicit in discussion of horizon entry and matter power spectrum.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5754 in / 1374 out tokens · 22733 ms · 2026-06-25T22:59:33.193879+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 41 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Harris, P

    P. Harris, P. Schuster, and J. Zupan,Snowmass White Paper: New flavors and rich structures in dark sectors, inSnowmass 2021, 7, 2022.arXiv:2207.08990

  2. [2]

    Krnjaic et al.,A Snowmass Whitepaper: Dark Matter Production at Intensity-Frontier Experiments,arXiv:2207.00597

    G. Krnjaic et al.,A Snowmass Whitepaper: Dark Matter Production at Intensity-Frontier Experiments,arXiv:2207.00597

  3. [3]

    Bellazzini, C

    B. Bellazzini, C. Cs´ aki, and J. Serra,Composite Higgses,Eur. Phys. J. C74(2014), no. 5 2766, [arXiv:1401.2457]

  4. [4]

    Panico and A

    G. Panico and A. Wulzer,The Composite Nambu-Goldstone Higgs, vol. 913. Springer, 2016

  5. [5]

    Contino, Y

    R. Contino, Y. Nomura, and A. Pomarol,Higgs as a Holographic Pseudo Goldstone Boson, Nucl. Phys. B671(2003) 148–174, [hep-ph/0306259]

  6. [6]

    Agashe, R

    K. Agashe, R. Contino, and A. Pomarol,The Minimal composite Higgs model,Nucl. Phys. B719(2005) 165–187, [hep-ph/0412089]

  7. [7]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 3370–3373, [hep-ph/9905221]

  8. [8]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum,An Alternative to compactification,Phys. Rev. Lett.83(1999) 4690–4693, [hep-th/9906064]

  9. [9]

    Rattazzi and A

    R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni,Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model,JHEP04(2001) 021, [hep-th/0012248]

  10. [10]

    Arkani-Hamed, M

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati, and L. Randall,Holography and phenomenology,JHEP08 (2001) 017, [hep-th/0012148]

  11. [11]

    Agashe and G

    K. Agashe and G. Servant,Warped unification, proton stability and dark matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 231805, [hep-ph/0403143]

  12. [12]

    Agashe and G

    K. Agashe and G. Servant,Baryon number in warped GUTs: Model building and (dark matter related) phenomenology,JCAP02(2005) 002, [hep-ph/0411254]

  13. [13]

    Agashe, A

    K. Agashe, A. Falkowski, I. Low, and G. Servant,KK Parity in Warped Extra Dimension, JHEP04(2008) 027, [arXiv:0712.2455]

  14. [14]

    Agashe, K

    K. Agashe, K. Blum, S. J. Lee, and G. Perez,Astrophysical Implications of a Visible Dark Matter Sector from a Custodially Warped-GUT,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 075012, [arXiv:0912.3070]

  15. [15]

    K. L. McDonald and D. E. Morrissey,Low-Energy Probes of a Warped Extra Dimension, JHEP05(2010) 056, [arXiv:1002.3361]. – 26 –

  16. [16]

    A. D. Medina and E. Ponton,Warped Radion Dark Matter,JHEP09(2011) 016, [arXiv:1104.4124]

  17. [17]

    M. Kim, S. J. Lee, and A. Parolini,WIMP Dark Matter in Composite Higgs Models and the Dilaton Portal,arXiv:1602.05590

  18. [18]

    M. G. Folgado, A. Donini, and N. Rius,Gravity-mediated Scalar Dark Matter in Warped Extra-Dimensions,arXiv:1907.04340. [Erratum: JHEP 02, 129 (2022)]

  19. [19]

    Donini, M

    A. Donini, M. G. Folgado, J. Herrero-Garc´ ıa, G. Landini, A. Mu˜ noz-Ovalle, and N. Rius, Dark Matter in an evanescent three-brane Randall-Sundrum scenario,JHEP11(2025) 037, [arXiv:2505.13601]

  20. [20]

    Donini, M

    A. Donini, M. G. Folgado, and A. Mu˜ noz-Ovalle,Dark matter in a three-brane Randall-Sundrum scenario out of the evanescent limit,JHEP02(2026) 206, [arXiv:2509.04580]

  21. [21]

    Y. Bai, M. Carena, and J. Lykken,Dilaton-assisted Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. Lett.103 (2009) 261803, [arXiv:0909.1319]

  22. [22]

    K. L. McDonald and D. E. Morrissey,Low-Energy Signals from Kinetic Mixing with a Warped Abelian Hidden Sector,JHEP02(2011) 087, [arXiv:1010.5999]

  23. [23]

    K. L. McDonald,Sommerfeld Enhancement from Multiple Mediators,JHEP07(2012) 145, [arXiv:1203.6341]

  24. [24]

    von Harling and K

    B. von Harling and K. L. McDonald,Secluded Dark Matter Coupled to a Hidden CFT, JHEP08(2012) 048, [arXiv:1203.6646]

  25. [25]

    D. J. Robinson and Y. Tsai,KeV Warm Dark Matter and Composite Neutrinos,JHEP08 (2012) 161, [arXiv:1205.0569]

  26. [26]

    D. J. Robinson and Y. Tsai,Dynamical framework for KeV Dirac neutrino warm dark matter,Phys. Rev. D90(2014), no. 4 045030, [arXiv:1404.7118]

  27. [27]

    K. Blum, M. Cliche, C. Csaki, and S. J. Lee,WIMP Dark Matter through the Dilaton Portal,JHEP03(2015) 099, [arXiv:1410.1873]

  28. [28]

    P. Brax, S. Fichet, and P. Tanedo,The Warped Dark Sector,Phys. Lett. B798(2019) 135012, [arXiv:1906.02199]

  29. [29]

    Bernal, A

    N. Bernal, A. Donini, M. G. Folgado, and N. Rius,Kaluza-Klein FIMP Dark Matter in Warped Extra-Dimensions,JHEP09(2020) 142, [arXiv:2004.14403]

  30. [30]

    B. Fuks, M. D. Goodsell, D. W. Kang, P. Ko, S. J. Lee, and M. Utsch,Heavy dark matter through the dilaton portal,JHEP10(2020) 044, [arXiv:2007.08546]

  31. [31]

    M. Redi, A. Tesi, and H. Tillim,Gravitational Production of a Conformal Dark Sector, JHEP05(2021) 010, [arXiv:2011.10565]

  32. [32]

    Bernal, A

    N. Bernal, A. Donini, M. G. Folgado, and N. Rius,FIMP Dark Matter in Clockwork/Linear Dilaton Extra-Dimensions,JHEP04(2021) 061, [arXiv:2012.10453]

  33. [33]

    de Giorgi and S

    A. de Giorgi and S. Vogl,Dark matter interacting via a massive spin-2 mediator in warped extra-dimensions,JHEP11(2021) 036, [arXiv:2105.06794]

  34. [34]

    de Giorgi and S

    A. de Giorgi and S. Vogl,Warm dark matter from a gravitational freeze-in in extra dimensions,JHEP04(2023) 032, [arXiv:2208.03153]. – 27 –

  35. [35]

    Ahmed, Z

    A. Ahmed, Z. Chacko, N. Desai, S. Doshi, C. Kilic, and S. Najjari,Composite dark matter and neutrino masses from a light hidden sector,JHEP07(2024) 260, [arXiv:2305.09719]

  36. [36]

    Ferrante, A

    S. Ferrante, A. Ismail, S. J. Lee, and Y. Lee,Forbidden conformal dark matter at a GeV, JHEP11(2023) 186, [arXiv:2308.16219]

  37. [37]

    Ahmed, Z

    A. Ahmed, Z. Chacko, N. Desai, S. Doshi, C. Kilic, S. Najjari, and R. P. R. Sudha, Long-Lived-Particle Signals of a Composite Hidden Sector through the Neutrino Portal, arXiv:2512.09046

  38. [38]

    S. Hong, G. Kurup, and M. Perelstein,Conformal Freeze-In of Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D 101(2020), no. 9 095037, [arXiv:1910.10160]

  39. [39]

    S. Hong, G. Kurup, and M. Perelstein,Dark matter from a conformal Dark Sector,JHEP 02(2023) 221, [arXiv:2207.10093]

  40. [40]

    W. H. Chiu, S. Hong, and L.-T. Wang,Conformal freeze-in, composite dark photon, and asymmetric reheating,JHEP03(2023) 172, [arXiv:2209.10563]

  41. [41]

    S. Hong, M. Perelstein, and T. Youn,Conformal freeze-in from neutrino portal,JHEP04 (2025) 089, [arXiv:2412.00181]

  42. [42]

    Luo and M

    L. Luo and M. Perelstein,Conformal Freeze-in dark matter: 5D dual and phase transition, JHEP06(2025) 154, [arXiv:2502.06965]

  43. [43]

    Creminelli, A

    P. Creminelli, A. Nicolis, and R. Rattazzi,Holography and the electroweak phase transition, JHEP03(2002) 051, [hep-th/0107141]

  44. [44]

    Randall and G

    L. Randall and G. Servant,Gravitational waves from warped spacetime,JHEP05(2007) 054, [hep-ph/0607158]

  45. [45]

    von Harling and G

    B. von Harling and G. Servant,QCD-induced Electroweak Phase Transition,JHEP01 (2018) 159, [arXiv:1711.11554]

  46. [46]

    Baratella, A

    P. Baratella, A. Pomarol, and F. Rompineve,The Supercooled Universe,JHEP03(2019) 100, [arXiv:1812.06996]

  47. [47]

    Agashe, P

    K. Agashe, P. Du, M. Ekhterachian, S. Kumar, and R. Sundrum,Cosmological Phase Transition of Spontaneous Confinement,JHEP05(2020) 086, [arXiv:1910.06238]

  48. [48]

    Agashe, P

    K. Agashe, P. Du, M. Ekhterachian, S. Kumar, and R. Sundrum,Phase Transitions from the Fifth Dimension,JHEP02(2021) 051, [arXiv:2010.04083]

  49. [49]

    Cs´ aki, M

    C. Cs´ aki, M. Geller, Z. Heller-Algazi, and A. Ismail,Relevant dilaton stabilization,JHEP 06(2023) 202, [arXiv:2301.10247]

  50. [50]

    Er¨ oncel, J

    C. Er¨ oncel, J. Hubisz, S. J. Lee, G. Rigo, and B. Sambasivam,New horizons in the holographic conformal phase transition,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024), no. 8 794, [arXiv:2305.03773]

  51. [51]

    R. K. Mishra and L. Randall,Phase transition to RS: cool, not supercool,JHEP06(2024) 099, [arXiv:2401.09633]

  52. [52]

    Ismail and L.-T

    A. Ismail and L.-T. Wang,Uncool soft-wall transitions and gravitational waves, arXiv:2604.06306

  53. [53]

    J. Liu, L. Bian, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, and S.-J. Wang,Constraining First-Order Phase Transitions with Curvature Perturbations,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023), no. 5 051001, [arXiv:2208.14086]. – 28 –

  54. [54]

    G. Elor, R. Jinno, S. Kumar, R. McGehee, and Y. Tsai,Finite Bubble Statistics Constrain Late Cosmological Phase Transitions,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024), no. 21 211003, [arXiv:2311.16222]

  55. [55]

    M. R. Buckley, P. Du, N. Fernandez, and M. J. Weikert,Dark radiation isocurvature from cosmological phase transitions,JCAP07(2024) 031, [arXiv:2402.13309]

  56. [56]

    Greene, A

    K. Greene, A. Ireland, G. Krnjaic, and Y. Tsai,Observable CMB B-modes from Cosmological Phase Transitions,arXiv:2410.23348

  57. [58]

    R. Xu, J. Lu, S. Deng, and L. Bian,Phase transitions in the early Universe: Impacts on BBN and CMB observables,Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 9 095038, [arXiv:2503.19737]

  58. [59]

    Koren, Y

    S. Koren, Y. Tsai, and R. Wang,Boiling After the Dust Settles: Constraining First-Order Phase Transitions During Dark Energy Domination,arXiv:2509.07076

  59. [60]

    J. H. Chang, P. Du, S. Ghosh, and S. Kumar,Cosmological constraints on secluded dark radiation,JCAP02(2026) 075, [arXiv:2510.01309]

  60. [61]

    J. A. Zebrowski, A. Ireland, C. L. Reichardt, K. Greene, G. Krnjaic, Y. Tsai, and F. R. Bouchet,First constraints on causal sources of primordial gravitational waves from BICEP/Keck, SPTpol, SPT-3G, Planck and WMAPB-mode data,arXiv:2601.20958

  61. [62]

    Greene, D

    K. Greene, D. W. R. Ho, S. Kumar, and Y. Tsai,Cosmological and Astrophysical Constraints on Late First-Order Phase Transitions,arXiv:2603.00272

  62. [63]

    Chluba, A

    J. Chluba, A. L. Erickcek, and I. Ben-Dayan,Probing the inflaton: Small-scale power spectrum constraints from measurements of the CMB energy spectrum,Astrophys. J.758 (2012) 76, [arXiv:1203.2681]

  63. [64]

    B. Cyr, T. Kite, J. Chluba, J. C. Hill, D. Jeong, S. K. Acharya, B. Bolliet, and S. P. Patil, Disentangling the primordial nature of stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds with CMB spectral distortions,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.528(2024), no. 1 883–897, [arXiv:2309.02366]

  64. [65]

    P. W. Graham and H. Ramani,Constraints on dark matter from dynamical heating of stars in ultrafaint dwarfs. II. Substructure and the primordial power spectrum,Phys. Rev. D110 (2024), no. 7 075012, [arXiv:2404.01378]

  65. [66]

    W. Qin, S. Kumar, P. Natarajan, and N. Weiner,Not-quite-primordial black holes, arXiv:2506.13858

  66. [67]

    V. S. H. Lee, A. Mitridate, T. Trickle, and K. M. Zurek,Probing Small-Scale Power Spectra with Pulsar Timing Arrays,JHEP06(2021) 028, [arXiv:2012.09857]

  67. [68]

    S. Bird, M. Fernandez, M.-F. Ho, M. Qezlou, R. Monadi, Y. Ni, N. Chen, R. Croft, and T. Di Matteo,PRIYA: a new suite of Lyman-αforest simulations for cosmology,JCAP10 (2023) 037, [arXiv:2306.05471]

  68. [69]

    M. A. Fernandez, S. Bird, and M.-F. Ho,Cosmological constraints from the eBOSS Lyman-αforest using the PRIYA simulations,JCAP07(2024) 029, [arXiv:2309.03943]

  69. [70]

    A. He, M. M. Ivanov, S. Bird, R. An, and V. Gluscevic,Fresh look at neutrino self-interactions with the Lyman-αforest: Constraints from EFT and PRIYA simulations, Phys. Rev. D112(2025), no. 6 063540, [arXiv:2503.15592]. – 29 –

  70. [71]

    Freese and M

    K. Freese and M. W. Winkler,Dark matter and gravitational waves from a dark big bang, Phys. Rev. D107(2023), no. 8 083522, [arXiv:2302.11579]

  71. [72]

    Bigazzi, A

    F. Bigazzi, A. Caddeo, T. Canneti, and A. L. Cotrone,Bubble wall velocity at strong coupling,JHEP08(2021) 090, [arXiv:2104.12817]

  72. [73]

    Y. Bea, J. Casalderrey-Solana, T. Giannakopoulos, D. Mateos, M. Sanchez-Garitaonandia, and M. Zilh˜ ao,Bubble wall velocity from holography,Phys. Rev. D104(2021), no. 12 L121903, [arXiv:2104.05708]. [74]PlanckCollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [arXiv:1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astr...

  73. [74]

    P. Bode, J. P. Ostriker, and N. Turok,Halo formation in warm dark matter models, Astrophys. J.556(2001) 93–107, [astro-ph/0010389]

  74. [75]

    M. Viel, J. Lesgourgues, M. G. Haehnelt, S. Matarrese, and A. Riotto,Constraining warm dark matter candidates including sterile neutrinos and light gravitinos with WMAP and the Lyman-alpha forest,Phys. Rev. D71(2005) 063534, [astro-ph/0501562]

  75. [76]

    Lesgourgues,The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview, arXiv:1104.2932

    J. Lesgourgues,The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview, arXiv:1104.2932

  76. [77]

    D. Blas, J. Lesgourgues, and T. Tram,The cosmic linear anisotropy solving system (class). part ii: Approximation schemes,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2011 (July, 2011) 034–034

  77. [78]

    M. A. Amin, M. S. Delos, and M. Mirbabayi,Structure formation with warm white noise: Effects of finite number density and velocity dispersion in particle and wave dark matter, JCAP01(2026) 016, [arXiv:2503.20881]

  78. [79]

    S. C. Tadepalli and T. Takahashi,Warm Dark Matter meets Cold Dark Matter Isocurvature,arXiv:2508.03805

  79. [80]

    R. T. Co, S. C. Lam, S. C. Tadepalli, and T. Takahashi,Reviving sub-keV warm dark matter: a UVLF-based analysis,arXiv:2512.16987

  80. [81]

    Zhong, B

    H. Zhong, B. Gong, and T. Qiu,Gravitational waves from bubble collisions in FLRW spacetime,JHEP02(2022) 077, [arXiv:2107.01845]

Showing first 80 references.