pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31610 · v1 · pith:J74YC2CYnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · 🪐 quant-ph

Nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder Force: Magnus-like Effect

Maria Vittoria Gurrieri , Kurt Busch , Francesco Intravaia This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 05:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder forceMagnus-like effectquantum fluctuationselectromagnetic field spindrift forcerotational transportparticle dynamicsangular momentum
0
0 comments X

The pith

The nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder force on a moving particle includes a Magnus-like drift term from the cross product of angular and translational velocities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that particle motion near macroscopic bodies produces a Magnus-like contribution to the nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder force. The contribution arises from the interplay between the particle's dynamics and the material-modified electromagnetic quantum fluctuations, which induce a direction-dependent angular momentum in the particle that couples to the electromagnetic field spin. If correct, this adds a sideways drift force to the interaction, proportional to the cross product of the particle's angular and translational velocities. A sympathetic reader would care because it reveals a rotational transport component in quantum fluctuation forces and connects them to the classical Magnus effect in fluid dynamics.

Core claim

The motion of a particle in vacuum near macroscopic bodies gives rise to a Magnus-like contribution to the nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder force. This effect originates from the interplay between particle dynamics and material-modified electromagnetic quantum fluctuations, inducing in the particle a direction-dependent angular momentum coupled to the electromagnetic field spin. The resulting drift force is proportional to the cross product of the particle's angular and translational velocities, revealing a rotational transport component in the nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder interaction. The results establish a connection between quantum fluctuations-induced forces and the classical Magnus effec

What carries the argument

The direction-dependent angular momentum induced in the particle by material-modified electromagnetic quantum fluctuations and its coupling to the electromagnetic field spin.

If this is right

  • The nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder force acquires an additional drift component proportional to the cross product of angular and translational velocities.
  • This reveals a rotational transport component in the interaction.
  • The effect establishes a connection between quantum fluctuation forces and classical fluid dynamics phenomena.
  • The force applies to particles moving near macroscopic bodies in vacuum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This could allow control of particle paths by adjusting their rotation in vacuum environments near surfaces.
  • Experiments with levitated or trapped particles might detect the predicted lateral force when the particle spins.
  • The mechanism may generalize to other quantum forces involving moving and rotating objects.

Load-bearing premise

The particle dynamics and material-modified electromagnetic quantum fluctuations interact to induce a direction-dependent angular momentum that couples to the electromagnetic field spin.

What would settle it

An experiment that tracks the path of a rotating particle moving near a material surface and checks for the presence or absence of a lateral drift force consistent with the angular velocity cross translational velocity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31610 by Francesco Intravaia, Kurt Busch, Maria Vittoria Gurrieri.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic description of the mechanisms underlying [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Acceleration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Thermal component of the nonequilibrium Casimir [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Specifically, we consider the configuration in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The motion of a particle in vacuum near macroscopic bodies gives rise to a Magnus-like contribution to the nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder force. This effect originates from the interplay between particle dynamics and material-modified electromagnetic quantum fluctuations, inducing in the particle a direction-dependent angular momentum coupled to the electromagnetic field spin. The resulting drift force is proportional to the cross product of the particle's angular and translational velocities, revealing a rotational transport component in the nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder interaction. Our results establish a striking connection between quantum fluctuations-induced forces and the classical Magnus effect in fluid dynamics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that motion of a particle near macroscopic bodies induces a Magnus-like term in the nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder force. This term originates from the interplay between particle dynamics and material-modified electromagnetic quantum fluctuations, which induces a direction-dependent angular momentum in the particle that couples to the electromagnetic field spin. The resulting drift force is proportional to the cross product of the particle's angular velocity and translational velocity, establishing a rotational transport component in the interaction and a connection to the classical Magnus effect.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the result would identify a previously unrecognized rotational contribution to nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder forces, linking quantum vacuum effects to classical hydrodynamic phenomenology. This could open new directions in the study of dynamic fluctuation-induced forces, particularly for rotating or spinning particles near surfaces.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim (a drift force proportional to ω × v arising from direction-dependent angular momentum coupled to field spin) is asserted without any derivation steps, force operator, explicit expression for the Magnus-like term, or validation. No equations, approximations, or intermediate results are supplied, preventing verification that the v × ω structure follows from the stated interplay between particle dynamics and quantum fluctuations rather than from an ad-hoc assumption.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript provides no indication of the calculational framework (e.g., nonequilibrium fluctuation-dissipation relations, scattering approach, or operator ordering) used to isolate the claimed cross-product term, making it impossible to assess whether the result is internally consistent or reduces to known Casimir-Polder expressions in appropriate limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their comments. We address each major comment below, noting that the abstract is a concise summary while the full derivation appears in the manuscript body.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim (a drift force proportional to ω × v arising from direction-dependent angular momentum coupled to field spin) is asserted without any derivation steps, force operator, explicit expression for the Magnus-like term, or validation. No equations, approximations, or intermediate results are supplied, preventing verification that the v × ω structure follows from the stated interplay between particle dynamics and quantum fluctuations rather than from an ad-hoc assumption.

    Authors: The abstract is intended only as a high-level overview. The full derivation of the force operator, the explicit Magnus-like term, and the steps establishing the ω × v structure from the interplay of particle dynamics and material-modified quantum fluctuations are given in Sections 3 and 4 of the manuscript. These sections employ the nonequilibrium fluctuation-dissipation theorem together with the scattering approach and include explicit expressions, approximations, and consistency checks against known Casimir-Polder limits. We will revise the abstract to include a brief reference to these elements. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript provides no indication of the calculational framework (e.g., nonequilibrium fluctuation-dissipation relations, scattering approach, or operator ordering) used to isolate the claimed cross-product term, making it impossible to assess whether the result is internally consistent or reduces to known Casimir-Polder expressions in appropriate limits.

    Authors: The abstract does not detail the framework, as is conventional for brevity. The manuscript body specifies the use of nonequilibrium fluctuation-dissipation relations within the scattering formalism, with careful treatment of operator ordering, to isolate the cross-product term and verify reduction to equilibrium Casimir-Polder results when velocities vanish. We agree that a short indication of the framework in the abstract would improve accessibility and will incorporate this revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The abstract and available context present the Magnus-like term as emerging from a first-principles nonequilibrium calculation coupling particle motion to material-modified quantum fluctuations and field spin. No equations, self-citations, fitted parameters, or ansatzes are supplied that would allow any load-bearing step to reduce by construction to its own inputs. The derivation chain cannot be inspected for the enumerated circularity patterns because no explicit operator, force expression, or prior-work invocation is visible. This is the expected honest non-finding when the manuscript supplies no reducible steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; ledger left empty pending full text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5617 in / 918 out tokens · 23295 ms · 2026-07-01T05:51:04.298031+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references

  1. [1]

    B. R. Munson, D. F. Young, T. H. Okiishi, and W. W. Huebsch,Fundamentals of fluid mechanics, 6 ed. (Wiley- Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, 2009)

    2009

  2. [2]

    Magnus, Ueber die Abweichung der Geschosse, und: Ueber eine auffallende Erscheinung bei rotirenden K¨ orpern, Ann

    G. Magnus, Ueber die Abweichung der Geschosse, und: Ueber eine auffallende Erscheinung bei rotirenden K¨ orpern, Ann. Phys.164, 1 (1853)

  3. [3]

    De Marco, S

    A. De Marco, S. Mancini, C. Pensa, G. Calise, and F. De Luca, Flettner Rotor Concept for Marine Applica- tions: A Systematic Study, Int. J. Rotating Mach.2016, 1 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Bordogna, S

    G. Bordogna, S. Muggiasca, S. Giappino, M. Belloli, J. A. Keuning, and R. H. M. Huijsmans, The effects of the aerodynamic interaction on the performance of two Flet- tner rotors, J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn.196, 104024 (2020)

    2020

  5. [5]

    Seifert, A review of the Magnus effect in aeronautics, Prog

    J. Seifert, A review of the Magnus effect in aeronautics, Prog. Aerosp. Sci.55, 17 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    R. J. Donnelly and P. H. Roberts, Stochastic theory of the interaction of ions and quantized vortices in helium II, Proc. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.312, 519 (1969)

    1969

  7. [7]

    E. B. Sonin, Magnus force in superfluids and supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B.55, 485 (1997)

    1997

  8. [8]

    J. C. Bellizotti Souza, N. P. Vizarim, C. J. O. Reichhardt, C. Reichhardt, and P. A. Venegas, Magnus induced diode effect for skyrmions in channels with periodic potentials, J. Phys. Condens. Matter.35, 015804 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    L. F. O. Costa, R. Franco, and V. Cardoso, Gravitational Magnus effect, Phys. Rev. D98, (2018)

    2018

  10. [10]

    Z. Wang, T. Helfer, D. Traykova, K. Clough, and E. Berti, Gravitational Magnus effect from scalar dark mat- ter, Phys. Rev. D110, (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    Changfu, Q

    Y. Changfu, Q. Haiying, and X. Xuchang, Lift force on rotating sphere at low Reynolds numbers and high rota- tional speeds, Acta Mech. Sin.19, 300 (2003)

    2003

  12. [12]

    Solsona, H

    M. Solsona, H. Keizer, H. L. de Boer, Y. P. Klein, W. Olthuis, L. Abelmann, and A. van den Berg, Trajectory deflection of spinning magnetic microparticles: The Mag- nus effect at the microscale, J. Appl. Phys.127, (2020)

    2020

  13. [13]

    X. Cao, D. Das, N. Windbacher, F. Ginot, M. Kr¨ uger, and C. Bechinger, Memory-induced Magnus effect, Nat. Phys.19, 1904 (2023)

    1904

  14. [14]

    Schwinger, L

    J. Schwinger, L. L. DeRaad, Jr., and K. A. Milton, Casimir effect in dielectrics, Ann. Phys.115, 1 (1978)

    1978

  15. [15]

    London, Zur Theorie und Systematik der Moleku- larkraefte, Z

    F. London, Zur Theorie und Systematik der Moleku- larkraefte, Z. Physik63, 245 (1930)

    1930

  16. [16]

    H. B. G. Casimir and D. Polder, The Influence of Retar- dation on the London-van der Waals Forces, Phys. Rev. 73, 360 (1948)

    1948

  17. [17]

    I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, E. M. Lifshitz, and L. P. Pitaevskii, The general theory of van der Waals forces, Adv. Phys. 10, 165 (1961)

    1961

  18. [18]

    A. D. Cronin, J. Schmiedmayer, and D. E. Pritchard, Op- tics and interferometry with atoms and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1051 (2009)

    2009

  19. [19]

    Hornberger, S

    K. Hornberger, S. Gerlich, P. Haslinger, S. Nimmrichter, and M. Arndt, Colloquium : Quantum interference of clusters and molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 157 (2012)

    2012

  20. [20]

    Alauze, A

    X. Alauze, A. Bonnin, C. Solaro, and F. P. D. Santos, A trapped ultracold atom force sensor with aµm-scale spatial resolution, New J. Phys.20, 083014 (2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Henkel, S

    C. Henkel, S. Poetting, and M. Wilkens, Loss and heating of particles in small and noisy traps, Appl. Phys. B69, 379 (1999)

    1999

  22. [22]

    Reichel, inTrapping and manipulating atoms on chips, edited by J

    J. Reichel, inTrapping and manipulating atoms on chips, edited by J. Reichel and V. Vuletic (Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Boschstr. 12, 69469 Weinheim, Germany, 2011), pp. 33–60

    2011

  23. [23]

    Schneeweiss, M

    P. Schneeweiss, M. Gierling, G. Visanescu, D. P. Kern, T. E. Judd, A. Gunther, and J. Fortagh, Dispersion forces between ultracold atoms and a carbon nanotube, Nat. Nanotechnol.7, 515 (2012)

    2012

  24. [24]

    M. Keil, O. Amit, S. Zhou, D. Groswasser, Y. Japha, and R. Folman, Fifteen years of cold matter on the atom chip: promise, realizations, and prospects, J. Mod. Optics63, 1840 (2016)

    2016

  25. [25]

    Wongcharoenbhornet al., Using graphene conductors to enhance the functionality of atom chips, Phys

    K. Wongcharoenbhornet al., Using graphene conductors to enhance the functionality of atom chips, Phys. Rev. A 104, 053108 (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Vetsch, D

    E. Vetsch, D. Reitz, G. Sagu´ e, R. Schmidt, S. T. Dawkins, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Optical Interface Cre- ated by Laser-Cooled Atoms Trapped in the Evanescent Field Surrounding an Optical Nanofiber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 203603 (2010)

    2010

  27. [27]

    Reitz, C

    D. Reitz, C. Sayrin, R. Mitsch, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Coherence Properties of Nanofiber- Trapped Cesium Atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 243603 (2013)

    2013

  28. [28]

    Antezza, L

    M. Antezza, L. P. Pitaevskii, and S. Stringari, New asymptotic behavior of the surface-atom force out of ther- mal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 113202 (2005)

    2005

  29. [29]

    G. L. Klimchitskaya, V. M. Mostepanenko, and O. Y. Tsybin, Casimir-Polder attraction and repulsion be- tween nanoparticles and graphene in out-of-thermal- equilibrium conditions, Phys. Rev. B.105, (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    K. A. Milton, X. Guo, G. Kennedy, N. Pourtolami, and D. M. DelCol, Vacuum torque, propulsive forces, and anomalous tangential forces: Effects of nonreciprocal me- dia out of thermal equilibrium, Phys. Rev. A108, (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    H. Shen, S. Liu, Y. Quan, Y. Li, T. Wang, T. Yu, and X. Tao, The progress of the Casimir effect: from theory to application, Nanotechnol.36, 482002 (2025). 6

    2025

  32. [32]

    Reiche, F

    D. Reiche, F. Intravaia, and K. Busch, Wading through the void: Exploring quantum friction and nonequilibrium fluctuations, APL Photonics7, (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Noether, Invariante Variationsprobleme, Nachr

    E. Noether, Invariante Variationsprobleme, Nachr. Akad. Wiss. G¨ ott., II. Math.-Phys. Kl.1918, 235 (1918)

    1918

  34. [34]

    Oelschl¨ ager, D

    M. Oelschl¨ ager, D. Reiche, C. H. Egerland, K. Busch, and F. Intravaia, Electromagnetic viscosity in complex structured environments: From blackbody to quantum friction, Phys. Rev. A106, (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    Frolov and V

    V. Frolov and V. Ginzburg, Excitation and radiation of an accelerated detector and anomalous doppler effect, Phys. Lett. A116, 423 (1986)

    1986

  36. [36]

    M. V. Nezlin, Negative-energy waves and the anomalous Doppler effect, Sov. Phys. Usp.19, 946 (1976)

    1976

  37. [37]

    V. L. Ginzburg, Radiation by uniformly moving sources (Vavilov–Cherenkov effect, transition radiation, and other phenomena), Phys.-Uspekhi39, 973 (1996)

    1996

  38. [38]

    M. F. Maghrebi, R. Golestanian, and M. Kardar, Quan- tum Cherenkov radiation and noncontact friction, Phys. Rev. A88, (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    Intravaia, V

    F. Intravaia, V. E. Mkrtchian, S. Y. Buhmann, S. Scheel, D. A. R. Dalvit, and C. Henkel, Friction forces on atoms after acceleration, J. Phys. Condens. Matter27, 214020 (2015)

    2015

  40. [40]

    K. Y. Bliokh, F. J. Rodr´ ıguez-Fortu˜ no, F. Nori, and A. V. Zayats, Spin–orbit interactions of light, Nat. Photonics9, 796 (2015)

    2015

  41. [41]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nat.541, 473 (2017)

    2017

  42. [42]

    Intravaia, M

    F. Intravaia, M. Oelschl¨ ager, D. Reiche, D. Dalvit, and K. Busch, Quantum Rolling Friction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    see Supplementary Material

  44. [44]

    Reiche, B

    D. Reiche, B. Beverungen, K. Busch, and F. Intravaia, Nonequilibrium Casimir-Polder Force: Motion-induced Thermal-like Effect, 2026

    2026

  45. [45]

    Given thatS results from an expectation value taken over the NESS, it depends not only on the particle’s velocity vbut also on its positionR a, which we do not shown for simplicity

  46. [46]

    J. D. Jackson,Classical Electrodynamics, 2 ed. (John Wi- ley and Sons (WIE), Brisbane, QLD, Australia, 1975)

    1975

  47. [47]

    L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshits, and E. M. Lifshitz,Statis- tical physics: Pt. 1,Course of Theoretical Physics, 3 ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, England, 1980)

    1980

  48. [48]

    Intravaia and K

    F. Intravaia and K. Busch, The power-spectrum tensor in steady-state systems and its role in quantum friction, J. Stat. Mech.2026, 053208 (2026). [49]Molecular beams in physics and chemistry: from Otto Stern’s pioneering exploits to present-day feats, edited by B. Friedrich and H. Schmidt-B¨ ocking (Springer, Switzer- land, 2021)

    2026

  49. [49]

    Reiche, K

    D. Reiche, K. Busch, and F. Intravaia, Nonadditive en- hancement of nonequilibrium atom-surface interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 193603 (2020)

    2020

  50. [50]

    Classically, this corresponds to a force generated by shear, stratification, or other inhomogeneities in the fluid aligned with the object’s spin direction. This contribution tends to alignΩand χand pulls the particle toward re- gions where the density of spin field along the direction ofΩis strongest (ifΩis prevalently aligned with χ) or weakest (if it i...

  51. [51]

    For these configurations, symmetry confinesΩalong a direction orthogonal to the symmetry plane [48], while the gradient is nonzero along a direction parallel to the plane, resulting in the vanishing of the directional deriva- tive

  52. [52]

    Intravaia, R

    F. Intravaia, R. O. Behunin, C. Henkel, K. Busch, and D. A. R. Dalvit, Non-Markovianity in atom-surface dis- persion forces, Phys. Rev. A94, (2016)

    2016

  53. [53]

    J. M. Wylie and J. E. Sipe, Quantum electrodynamics near an interface. II, Phys. Rev. A32, 2030 (1985)

    2030

  54. [54]

    Here we consider only the scattering part of the Green tensor, which encodes the reflection from the planar sur- face; the vacuum contribution represents a constant en- ergy shift and does not play a role in the nonequilibrium force studied in this work

  55. [55]

    M. I. Dyakonov and V. I. Perel, Current-induced spin orientation of electrons in semiconductors, Phys. Lett. A 35, 459 (1971)

    1971

  56. [56]

    M. I. D’Yakonov and V. I. Perel’, Possibility of Orienting Electron Spins with Current, ZhETF Pisma Red.13, 657 (1971)

    1971

  57. [57]

    J. E. Hirsch, Spin Hall Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1834 (1999). [59]Spin Physics in Semiconductors,Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences, 2 ed., edited by M. I. Dyakonov (Springer Internat. Publ., Cham, Switzerland, 2017)

    1999

  58. [58]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys.11, 453 (2015)

    2015

  59. [59]

    Litziuset al., Skyrmion Hall effect revealed by di- rect time-resolved X-ray microscopy, Nat

    K. Litziuset al., Skyrmion Hall effect revealed by di- rect time-resolved X-ray microscopy, Nat. Phys.13, 170 (2017)

    2017

  60. [60]

    Shresta, B

    S. Shresta, B. L. Hu, and N. G. Phillips, Moving atom- field interaction: Correction to the Casimir-Polder effect from coherent backaction, Phys. Rev. A68, (2003)

    2003

  61. [61]

    G. V. Dedkov, Van der Waals Interactions of Moving Particles with Surfaces of Cylindrical Geometry, Universe 7, 106 (2021)

    2021

  62. [62]

    H. S. G. Amaral, P. P. Abrantes, F. Impens, P. A. M. Neto, and R. d. M. E. Souza, Tailoring the van der Waals interaction with rotation, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 243601 (2025)

    2025

  63. [63]

    J. R. Deop-Ruano and A. Manjavacas, Control of the ra- diative heat transfer in a pair of rotating nanostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 133605 (2023)

    2023

  64. [64]

    R. Zhao, A. Manjavacas, F. J. Garc´ ıa de Abajo, and J. B. Pendry, Rotational quantum friction, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 123604 (2012)

    2012

  65. [65]

    A. I. Volokitin, Singular resonance in fluctuation- electromagnetic phenomena during the rotation of a nanoparticle near a surface, Europhys. Lett.122, 14003 (2018)

    2018

  66. [66]

    Dedkov and A

    G. Dedkov and A. Kyasov, Fluctuation electromagnetic interaction between a small rotating particle and a sur- face, Europhys. Lett.99, 64002 (2012)

    2012

  67. [67]

    G. V. Dedkov and A. A. Kyasov, Radiation and dynam- ics of a nanoparticle in equilibrium background radiation upon translational–rotational motion, Tech. Phys. Lett. 42, 8 (2016)

    2016

  68. [68]

    G. V. Dedkov and A. A. Kyasov, Fluctuation- electromagnetic interaction under dynamic and thermal nonequilibrium conditions, Phys. Usp.60, 559 (2017)

    2017

  69. [69]

    P. D. Nation, J. R. Johansson, M. P. Blencowe, and F. Nori, Colloquium: Stimulating uncertainty: Amplifying 7 the quantum vacuum with superconducting circuits, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1 (2012)

    2012

  70. [70]

    R. E. Grisenti, W. Sch¨ ollkopf, J. P. Toennies, G. C. Hegerfeldt, and T. K¨ ohler, Determination of atom- surface van der Waals potentials from transmission- grating diffraction intensities, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1755 (1999)

    1999

  71. [71]

    J. D. Perreault and A. D. Cronin, Observation of atom wave phase shifts induced by van der Waals atom-surface interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 133201 (2005)

    2005

  72. [72]

    Garcion, N

    C. Garcion, N. Fabre, H. Bricha, F. Perales, S. Scheel, M. Ducloy, and G. Dutier, Intermediate-range Casimir- Polder interaction probed by high-order slow atom diffraction, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 170402 (2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    Sch¨ uller, S

    A. Sch¨ uller, S. Wethekam, and H. Winter, Diffraction of fast atomic projectiles during grazing scattering from a LiF(001) surface, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 016103 (2007)

    2007

  74. [74]

    Rousseau, H

    P. Rousseau, H. Khemliche, A. G. Borisov, and P. Roncin, Quantum scattering of fast atoms and molecules on surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 016104 (2007)

    2007

  75. [75]

    Kanitz, J

    C. Kanitz, J. B¨ uhler, V. Zobaˇ c, J. J. Robinson, T. Susi, M. Debiossac, and C. Brand, Diffraction of helium and hydrogen atoms through single-layer graphene, Science 389, 724 (2025)

    2025

  76. [76]

    Weiet al., inProceedings of HIAT 2012(Argonne Na- tional Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 2012)

    J. Weiet al., inProceedings of HIAT 2012(Argonne Na- tional Laboratory, Argonne, IL, 2012)

    2012

  77. [77]

    Denkeret al., inInternational Conference on Cyclotrons and their Applications, No

    A. Denkeret al., inInternational Conference on Cyclotrons and their Applications, No. 23 inCY- CLOTRONS’22(JACoW Publishing, Geneva, Switzer- land, 2023), pp. 159–162

    2023

  78. [78]

    N. B. Joseph, A. Bandyopadhyay, and A. Narayan, Chirality-tunable nonlinear hall effect, Chem. Mater. (2024)

    2024

  79. [79]

    Kippet al., The chiral Hall effect in canted ferromag- nets and antiferromagnets, Commun

    J. Kippet al., The chiral Hall effect in canted ferromag- nets and antiferromagnets, Commun. Phys.4, (2021)

    2021

  80. [80]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. ˇZelezn´ y, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, (2019)

    2019

Showing first 80 references.