REVIEW 2 cited by
Recognizing Limits: Investigating Infeasibility in Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various tasks but often fail to handle queries that exceed their knowledge and capabilities, leading to incorrect or fabricated responses. This paper addresses the need for LLMs to recognize and refuse infeasible tasks due to the requests surpassing their capabilities. We conceptualize four main categories of infeasible tasks for LLMs, which cover a broad spectrum of hallucination-related challenges identified in prior literature. We develop and benchmark a new dataset comprising diverse infeasible and feasible tasks to evaluate multiple LLMs' abilities to decline infeasible tasks. Furthermore, we explore the potential of increasing LLMs' refusal capabilities with fine-tuning. Our experiments validate the effectiveness of the trained models, suggesting promising directions for improving the performance of LLMs in real-world applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
From Anatomy to Smells: An Empirical Study of SKILL.md in Agent Skills
Over 99% of real-world SKILL.md files contain skill smells (violations of authoring best practices), and those smells almost never disappear as the skills evolve.
-
A Simple and Effective Method for Uncertainty Quantification and OOD Detection
A single-model OOD detection method that measures feature-space density with a Gaussian kernel (IPF) reports AUROC 93.18 on CIFAR-10 vs SVHN, a marginal gain over DDU's 92.90, with the kernel width selected to maximize AUROC.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.