Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Look Ahead or Look Around? A Theoretical Comparison Between Autoregressive and Masked Pretraining

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.00935 v1 pith:JBR2GJYC submitted 2024-07-01 cs.LG cs.CL

classification cs.LGcs.CL
keywords autoregressivemaskedperformancegenerationtaskstheoreticalclassificationgenerative
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, the rise of generative self-supervised learning (SSL) paradigms has exhibited impressive performance across visual, language, and multi-modal domains. While the varied designs of generative SSL objectives lead to distinct properties in downstream tasks, a theoretical understanding of these differences remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we establish the first theoretical comparisons between two leading generative SSL paradigms: autoregressive SSL and masked SSL. Through establishing theoretical frameworks, we elucidate the strengths and limitations of autoregressive and masked SSL within the primary evaluation tasks of classification and content generation. Our findings demonstrate that in classification tasks, the flexibility of targeted tokens in masked SSL fosters more inter-sample connections compared to the fixed position of target tokens in autoregressive SSL, which yields superior clustering performance. In content generation tasks, the misalignment between the flexible lengths of test samples and the fixed length of unmasked texts in masked SSL (vs. flexible lengths of conditional texts in autoregressive SSL) hinders its generation performance. To leverage each other's strengths and mitigate weaknesses, we propose diversity-enhanced autoregressive and variable-length masked objectives, which substantially improve the classification performance of autoregressive SSL and the generation performance of masked SSL. Code is available at https://github.com/PKU-ML/LookAheadLookAround.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Masked Language Models are Good Heterogeneous Graph Generalizers

    cs.SI 2025-06 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A masked language model fine-tuned on metapath-derived text and cloze-style task templates transfers across heterogeneous graph datasets better than HGNN and LLM baselines, though link prediction results are compromis...

Pith tools