Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 4 minor 32 references

Wafer-scale correlated morphology and optoelectronic properties in GaAs/AlGaAs core-shell nanowires

T0 review · 5 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper shows that a two-inch wafer of GaAs/AlGaAs core-shell nanowires has uniform material quality, with carrier lifetime varying only 9% despite a 35% spread in emission intensity.

desk verdict Solid wafer-scale nanowire characterization with a plausible central claim, but the 9% lifetime uniformity needs stronger TCSPC fit statistics before it can carry the material-quality argument. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05275 v2 pith:JCMHYU4Z submitted 2025-01-09 physics.optics

Ishika Das , Keisuke Minehisa , Fumitaro Ishikawa , Patrick Parkinson , Stephen Church This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords GaAs/AlAscore-shellnanowireswafer-scaleuniformitytime-correlatedsinglephotoncountingcarrierlifetimemappingphotoluminescenceintensitymolecularbeamepitaxyonsiliconsolarenergyharvesting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a two-inch wafer of GaAs/AlGaAs core-shell nanowires grown on silicon has uniform material quality across its entire area, even though the amount of light it emits varies by up to 35%. The authors reach this conclusion by combining scanning electron microscopy with high-throughput time-correlated single-photon counting, producing maps of nanowire density, vertical alignment, emission intensity, and carrier recombination lifetime. The carrier lifetime, a probe of non-radiative recombination in the GaAs core, varies by only 9% across the wafer. They argue that the intensity variation is caused by differences in nanowire density and orientation, which change the volume of material excited and the efficiency of light coupling, rather than by variations in material quality. If correct, this distinguishes growth coverage uniformity from material quality and supports scalable III-V-on-silicon devices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the high-throughput TCSPC mapping technique, which records full photoluminescence decay histograms at micron-scale points and extracts both emission intensity and carrier lifetime from each point. A bi-exponential fit yields a fast component of 0.1 ns, at the instrument response, assigned to non-radiative trapping, and a slow component of 1.7 ns, assigned to radiative excitonic recombination combined with Shockley-Read-Hall recombination at point defects in the GaAs core. The slow lifetime is used as the proxy for material quality. A geometric model for the excitation volume, based on the 200-300 nm absorption depth in GaAs and the surface area of tilted nanowires, quantifies how vertical yield changes the effective amount of material probed and explains the sublinear intensity-density relationship.

What would settle it

Measure the same wafer with a TCSPC system with a faster instrument response, or deconvolve the instrument response, and compare the extracted slow lifetimes point-by-point; if the fast component varies spatially or the slow lifetime changes by more than 9%, the uniformity claim collapses. A complementary test is spatially resolved cathodoluminescence on high- and low-density regions to directly image defect emission.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the decoupling of morphological and optoelectronic uniformity. Emission intensity varies by 35% at the wafer scale and 21% at the micron scale, while carrier recombination lifetime varies by 9% at both scales, with a variation of only 2% across the central 40 mm. The authors conclude that the GaAs core material is of consistent quality across the wafer, because the lifetime is insensitive to nanowire density and pumping efficiency, and instead ties the intensity differences to local nanowire density and vertical yield. Regions with higher density show higher vertical yield, higher PL intensity, and slightly longer lifetimes; the sublinear intensity-density relation (power 0.5) is explained by orientation-dependent changes in the excited volume, not by reduced material quality.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that material quality is uniform relies on the assumption that the slow TCSPC lifetime (1.7 ns) faithfully measures bulk carrier recombination in the GaAs core, with the fast 0.1 ns component and fitting uncertainties not affecting the reported 9% variation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Carrier lifetime maps offer a density-independent metric of nanowire material quality on a wafer scale.
  • The 9% lifetime uniformity sets a benchmark for self-catalyzed MBE growth and indicates that coverage uniformity, not material perfection, was the main challenge on this wafer.
  • For light-harvesting applications, the 1.2% absorptivity variation and 98% mean absorption support the use of these nanowire wafers in large-area photovoltaics.
  • The correlation method can be applied to other semiconductor nanowire systems to separate morphology effects from intrinsic material quality.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to vary excitation fluence or use a faster time-resolution system to see whether the unresolved 0.1 ns component changes across the wafer; if it does, the reported lifetime uniformity may be an artifact.
  • The paper implies that for nanowire-based solar cells, controlling nanowire orientation and density is as important as improving material purity, since optical coupling depends strongly on these geometric factors.
  • Spatially resolved cathodoluminescence or transmission electron microscopy on the wafer's edge regions could identify which defect species, if any, underlie the residual 9% lifetime variation.
  • The same measurement strategy could serve as an in-line quality control tool in industrial MBE, where rapid lifetime mapping would catch defective regions that intensity alone would hide.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 4 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports a wafer-scale correlation study of GaAs/AlGaAs core-shell nanowires grown by self-catalyzed MBE on a two-inch Si(111) substrate. SEM observations at 130 points provide maps of nanowire density and vertical yield, while high-throughput TCSPC provides maps of PL intensity and carrier lifetime at both wafer and micron scales; reflectivity measurements are converted into an absorptivity map. The main claims are that nanowire density and vertical yield vary by about 20% and 7% over the full wafer, PL intensity varies by up to 35%, carrier lifetime varies by only 9%, and that the intensity variation is therefore dominated by density and orientation effects rather than by material quality. The paper also reports a sublinear power-law relationship (B = 0.5) between PL intensity and nanowire density, and a mean absorptivity of 98%.

Significance. The work addresses a relevant problem: correlating morphological uniformity with optoelectronic uniformity in III-V nanowires on Si at wafer scale. The strengths are the systematic dataset (130 SEM sites, micron-scale TCSPC maps, and a GaAs reference wafer control), the internal consistency of the density and vertical-yield maps, and the explicit power-dependence check. If the lifetime-uniformity result survives the validation issues raised below, it would be a valuable demonstration that density and orientation, rather than defect density, dominate emission-intensity variations in this material system. The conclusions are empirically based rather than derived from a fitted model, so circularity is not a concern; however, several load-bearing assumptions in the lifetime and absorption analysis need to be substantiated before the central claim can be accepted.

major comments (5)
  1. [The TCSPC fitting appears in Figure 2(b) and underlies the lifetime map in Figures 2(e) and 3(b).] The central claim of uniform material quality rests on the 9% variation of the slow TCSPC lifetime, but the fitting procedure is not validated against the instrument response. The paper states that the fast decay component (0.1 ns) is at the system response of approximately 0.1 ns, yet no deconvolution, fit residuals, per-pixel uncertainties, or count-rate and pile-up limits are reported. With a fast component at the IRF, the extracted slow component can be biased by IRF misalignment and photon-counting statistics, so the reported 9% wafer-scale standard deviation could be fitting noise or systematic bias rather than a measure of material uniformity. Please provide deconvolved fits, uncertainty maps, and a demonstration that the slow lifetime is stable under reasonable variations in the IRF and count rate.
  2. [The excitation conditions are described in the paragraph containing Figure 2(b), and the power-dependence check is in…] The excitation spot diameter of 1.4 µm combined with local densities of 3.5–4.7 × 10^8 cm^-2 means each acquisition averages between 4 and 9 nanowires, giving a factor of about two variation in pump fluence per nanowire across the wafer. The power-dependence check in Supplementary Figure S7(b) shows that PL intensity is linear in fluence, but it does not show that the extracted slow lifetime is independent of carrier density; SRH saturation and bimolecular recombination can both cause lifetime to depend on excitation density. Please report lifetime as a function of fluence, or an equivalent per-pixel count-rate and pile-up analysis, to rule out an excitation-density artifact in the 9% lifetime-uniformity claim.
  3. [Figure 3(d) and the surrounding discussion of the power-law fit appear in the section on correlations between measured…] The text fits a power law with B = 0.5 to the PL intensity versus nanowire density data and infers that the overall emission efficiency drops by 12% at higher densities. The same sub-linearity is later attributed to the orientation-dependent effective substrate coverage shown in Figure 3(f), and no uncertainty is given for B. These two explanations invoke different physical mechanisms, and the data as presented cannot distinguish the efficiency-drop interpretation from the geometric-area interpretation. Please report the fit uncertainty and, ideally, a joint model that includes density, vertical yield, and lifetime as covariates.
  4. [The assignment of the 1.7 ns lifetime is discussed in the paragraph following Figure 2(b).] The assignment of the 1.7 ns component to radiative and SRH recombination in the nominally undoped GaAs core does not account for the p-doped AlGaAs shell and the p+ GaAs outer layer, which together form a radial p-n junction. If built-in fields or carrier separation contribute to the measured decay, a uniform lifetime could reflect a uniform junction rather than a uniform defect density. Please discuss this possibility quantitatively, for example using band-structure estimates, or provide a control measurement that isolates core recombination.
  5. [The absorptivity map appears in Figure 1(f) and its radial analysis in Supplementary Figure S7(a).] The absorptivity map is derived from reflectivity alone using the assumption that absorption and reflection sum to unity. For a nanowire array on a Si substrate, transmission into the substrate and diffuse scattering are not necessarily negligible at 532 nm, so the mean absorptivity of 98% and the 1.2% wafer-scale variation are not quantitatively established. Please add a transmission and scattering measurement or model, or restate the absorption map as a reflection-based lower bound with appropriate caveats.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Caption of Figure 2(c) and Figure 2(e) versus the main text describing those panels.] The caption states that each pixel in (c) and (e) represents the standard deviation from the median values plotted in (d) and (f), while the main text states that each pixel value represents the median of the corresponding local maps; please clarify which statistic is displayed in the wafer-scale maps.
  2. [Throughout the manuscript text and supplementary captions.] There are several typos: 'Schockley-Read-Hall' should be 'Shockley-Read-Hall', 'Supplemetary' should be 'Supplementary' after Figure 1(f), and 'statictics' in the Figure S3 caption should be 'statistics'.
  3. [The power-dependence paragraph referencing Supplementary Figure S7(b).] The fluence range and the number of measurements used in the power-dependence test are not stated; please include these details so that the linear-regime claim can be assessed.
  4. [Main text density values versus Supplementary Figure S3.] The main text reports the center density as 4.7 × 10^8 cm^-2 with 10% variation across a 20 mm diameter, while Supplementary Figure S3 gives (4.67 ± 0.85) × 10^8 cm^-2; please make the reporting of the uncertainty and the radial range consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's correlations and geometric model are self-contained empirical analyses; the lifetime-uniformity claim rests on measurement validity, not on a circular derivation.

full rationale

This paper is an empirical characterization study, not a derivation from fitted parameters that are then used to predict the same data. The central claim is that PL intensity varies by up to 35% while the slow TCSPC carrier lifetime varies by only 9%, indicating stable material quality. This claim is supported by direct measurements: SEM-derived density and vertical-yield maps, TCSPC intensity and lifetime maps, and a reference GaAs wafer used to validate the technique. The power-law exponent B = 0.5 in the intensity-versus-density correlation is fitted to the intensity data and then interpreted as a sublinear scaling; this is a descriptive fit, not a prediction of a quantity that was used to construct the fit. The accompanying geometric model uses independently measured SEM projection lengths and nanowire orientation statistics to estimate a 10% substrate-coverage effect, which is compared with, rather than fitted to, the observed intensity sub-linearity. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no result is imported solely from a self-citation, and no uniqueness theorem is invoked. The self-citations to the growth method (Minehisa et al.) and the high-throughput TCSPC method (Church et al.) are methodological: the actual measurements and validations are presented in this paper, including an external reference sample, so the citations are not load-bearing in the argument. The main vulnerability identified by the skeptic, namely that the 0.1 ns fast decay sits at the instrument response and no deconvolution or per-pixel fitting uncertainties are reported, is a question of measurement validity and fitting rigor, not circularity. A biased or noisy lifetime extraction could undermine the material-quality conclusion, but that would be an experimental limitation rather than a logical reduction of the conclusion to its inputs. Overall, no circular step in the paper's reasoning chain was found.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard experimental assumptions about what the TCSPC decay and reflectivity maps represent, plus fitted power-law exponents used for interpretation. No new physical entities are introduced. The four axioms listed are measurement-model assumptions; the most fragile is the biexponential decomposition, because the fast component is at the instrument response and its uncertainty is not quantified.

free parameters (3)
  • Power-law exponent B for PL intensity vs nanowire density = B = 0.5
    Fitted to wafer-scale data in Figure 3(d); used to infer that emission efficiency drops by 12% at higher density. No confidence interval or fit residual is reported.
  • Power-law exponent B for vertical yield vs nanowire density = B ~ 0.2 (implied by a 15% yield increase per density doubling)
    Power-law fit in Figure 3(c); supporting correlation, not load-bearing for the main conclusion.
  • Biexponential TCSPC decay lifetimes = fast ~0.1 ns, slow ~1.7 ns
    Extracted from each decay curve; the uniformity of the slow lifetime is the central evidence for uniform material quality. These are data-derived parameters, but their uncertainty is not propagated into the reported 9% variation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The TCSPC decay is represented by a biexponential function, with the fast component assigned to non-radiative recombination and the slow component to radiative or SRH recombination in the GaAs core.
    Introduced in the paragraph around Figure 2(b): 'A bi-exponential function is fit to the data to extract the carrier recombination lifetimes... For this discussion we focus on the slower lifetime of 1.7 ns.' The fast component is at the instrument response, so the decomposition is not independently verified.
  • domain assumption Absorptivity is obtained from reflectivity as A = 1 minus R; total of absorption and reflection sums to unity.
    Stated explicitly in the absorptivity paragraph: 'Assuming that the total of absorption and reflection sums to unity.' Transmission and scattering through the nanowire array are not included.
  • domain assumption Light coupling efficiency is facet-independent, so the pumped volume scales with the projected area of the nanowires under the laser spot.
    Used in the model linking sublinear PL intensity to vertical yield: 'assuming that the light coupling efficiency is similar from each facet.' This supports the claim that coverage, not material quality, drives intensity variation.
  • domain assumption Power-dependence measurements guarantee that the excitation is in the linear regime, so carrier dynamics are not distorted by saturation of defect states.
    Mentioned in the discussion of lifetime variation: 'power-dependence measurements... ensuring that the measurements were performed in the linear regime.' The supporting data are only shown in the supplement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wafer-scale correlated morphology and optoelectronic properties in GaAs/AlGaAs core-shell nanowires." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JCMHYU4Z

@misc{pith2026250105275,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wafer-scale correlated morphology and optoelectronic properties in GaAs/AlGaAs core-shell nanowires},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JCMHYU4Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05275}
}
read the original abstract

Achieving uniform nanowire size, density, and alignment across a wafer is challenging, as small variations in growth parameters can impact performance in energy harvesting devices like solar cells and photodetectors. This study demonstrates the in-depth characterization of uniformly grown GaAs/AlGaAs core-shell nanowires on a two-inch Si(111) substrate using Ga-induced self-catalyzed molecular beam epitaxy. By integrating Scanning Electron Microscopy and Time Correlated Single-Photon Counting, we establish a detailed model of structural and optoelectronic properties across wafer and micron scales. While emission intensity varies by up to 35%, carrier lifetime shows only 9% variation, indicating stable material quality despite structural inhomogeneities. These findings indicate that, for the two-inch GaAs/AlGaAs nanowire wafer, achieving uniform nanowire coverage had a greater impact on consistent optoelectronic properties than variations in material quality, highlighting its significance for scalable III-V semiconductor integration on silicon in advanced optoelectronic devices such as solar cells and photodetectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.05275 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Two-inch wafer containing GaAs/AlGaAs core-shell nanowires, with a mostly uniform matte-black appearance indicating coverage [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) PL spectrum of a reference GaAs wafer (red) compared to GaAs/AlGaAs core-shell nanowires (purple). (b) Median carrier [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a) Micron-scale variation in PL intensity, showing a local standard deviation of 21% compared to a 35% variation at the wafer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    M rtensson , author C

    author author T. M rtensson , author C. P. T. \ Svensson , author B. A. \ Wacaser , author M. W. \ Larsson , author W. Seifert , author K. Deppert , author A. Gustafsson , author L. R. \ Wallenberg , \ and\ author L. Samuelson ,\ title title Epitaxial III-V nanowires on silicon , \ 10.1021/NL0487267 journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 4 ,\ pages 1987--1...

    work page doi:10.1021/nl0487267

  3. [3]

    author author L. C. \ Chuang , author M. Moewe , author C. Chase , author N. P. \ Kobayashi , author C. Chang-Hasnain , \ and\ author S. Crankshaw ,\ title title Critical diameter for III-V nanowires grown on lattice-mismatched substrates , \ 10.1063/1.2436655/333529 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 90 ,\ pages 43115 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2436655/333529

  4. [4]

    Borg , author H

    author author M. Borg , author H. Schmid , author K. E. \ Moselund , author G. Signorello , author L. Gignac , author J. Bruley , author C. Breslin , author P. Das Kanungo , author P. Werner , \ and\ author H. Riel ,\ title title Vertical III-V nanowire device integration on Si(100) , \ 10.1021/NL404743J/SUPPL \_ FILE/NL404743J \_ SI \_ 001.PDF journal jo...

    work page doi:10.1021/nl404743j/suppl

  5. [5]

    author author N. I. \ Goktas , author P. Wilson , author A. Ghukasyan , author D. Wagner , author S. McNamee , \ and\ author R. R. \ LaPierre ,\ title title Nanowires for energy: A review , \ 10.1063/1.5054842/124236 journal journal Applied Physics Reviews \ volume 5 ,\ pages 41305 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5054842/124236

  6. [6]

    author author M. D. \ Kelzenberg , author S. W. \ Boettcher , author J. A. \ Petykiewicz , author D. B. \ Turner-Evans , author M. C. \ Putnam , author E. L. \ Warren , author J. M. \ Spurgeon , author R. M. \ Briggs , author N. S. \ Lewis , \ and\ author H. A. \ Atwater ,\ title title Enhanced absorption and carrier collection in Si wire arrays for photo...

    work page doi:10.1038/nmat2635

  7. [7]

    author author O. L. \ Muskens , author J. G. \ Rivas , author R. E. \ Algra , author E. P. \ Bakkers , \ and\ author A. Lagendijk ,\ title title Design of light scattering in nanowire materials for photovoltaic applications , \ 10.1021/NL0808076/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/NL-2008-008076 \_ 0005.JPEG journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 8 ,\ pages 2638--2642 ( ye...

    work page doi:10.1021/nl0808076/asset/images/large/nl-2008-008076

  8. [8]

    author author S. L. \ Diedenhofen , author O. T. \ Janssen , author G. Grzela , author E. P. \ Bakkers , \ and\ author J. G \' o mez Rivas ,\ title title Strong geometrical dependence of the absorption of light in arrays of semiconductor nanowires , \ 10.1021/NN103596N/SUPPL \_ FILE/NN103596N \_ SI \_ 001.PDF journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 5 ,\ pages 2...

    work page doi:10.1021/nn103596n/suppl

Show all 32 references
  1. [9]

    author author M. D. L. \ Mata , author X. Zhou , author F. Furtmayr , author J. Teubert , author S. Grade c ak , author M. Eickhoff , author A. Fontcuberta I Morral , \ and\ author J. Arbiol ,\ title title A review of MBE grown 0D, 1D and 2D quantum structures in a nanowire , ...

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author M. S. \ Gudiksen , author L. J. \ Lauhon , author J. Wang , author D. C. \ Smith , \ and\ author C. M. \ Lieber ,\ title title Growth of nanowire superlattice structures for nanoscale photonics and electronics , \ 10.1038/415617a journal journal Nature 2002 415:6...

    doi

  3. [11]

    author author S. L. \ Chen , author W. M. \ Chen , author F. Ishikawa , \ and\ author I. A. \ Buyanova ,\ title title Suppression of non-radiative surface recombination by N incorporation in GaAs/GaNAs core/shell nanowires , \ 10.1038/srep11653 journal journal Scientific Repor...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Chen , author T

    author author R. Chen , author T. T. D. \ Tran , author K. W. \ Ng , author W. S. \ Ko , author L. C. \ Chuang , author F. G. \ Sedgwick , \ and\ author C. Chang-Hasnain ,\ title title Nanolasers grown on silicon , \ 10.1038/nphoton.2010.315 journal journal Nature Photonics \ ...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Paramasivam , author N

    author author P. Paramasivam , author N. Gowthaman , \ and\ author V. M. \ Srivastava ,\ title title Self-consistent Analysis for Optimization of AlGaAs/GaAs Based Heterostructure , \ 10.1007/S42835-023-01721-7/TABLES/2 journal journal Journal of Electrical Engineering and Tec...

    doi

  6. [14]

    author author L. J. \ Lauhon , author M. S. \ Gudlksen , author D. Wang , \ and\ author C. M. \ Lieber ,\ title title Epitaxial core–shell and core–multishell nanowire heterostructures , \ 10.1038/nature01141 journal journal Nature 2002 420:6911 \ volume 420 ,\ pages 57--61 ( ...

    doi

  7. [15]

    Glas , author M

    author author F. Glas , author M. R. \ Ramdani , author G. Patriarche , \ and\ author J. C. \ Harmand ,\ title title Predictive modeling of self-catalyzed III-V nanowire growth , \ 10.1103/PHYSREVB.88.195304/FIGURES/10/MEDIUM journal journal Physical Review B - Condensed Matte...

    doi

  8. [16]

    Barrig \' o n , author M

    author author E. Barrig \' o n , author M. Heurlin , author Z. Bi , author B. Monemar , \ and\ author L. Samuelson ,\ title title Synthesis and Applications of III-V Nanowires , \ 10.1021/ACS.CHEMREV.9B00075/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/CR-2019-00075A \_ 0024.JPEG journal journal Chemic...

    doi

  9. [17]

    Jabeen , author V

    author author F. Jabeen , author V. Grillo , author S. Rubini , \ and\ author F. Martelli ,\ title title Self-catalyzed growth of GaAs nanowires on cleaved Si by molecular beam epitaxy , \ 10.1088/0957-4484/19/27/275711 journal journal Nanotechnology \ volume 19 ,\ pages 27571...

    doi

  10. [18]

    author author S. A. \ Church , author H. Choi , author N. Al-Amairi , author R. Al-Abri , author E. Sanders , author E. Oksenberg , author E. Joselevich , \ and\ author P. W. \ Parkinson ,\ title title Holistic Determination of Optoelectronic Properties using High-Throughput S...

    doi

  11. [19]

    Jia , author Z

    author author C. Jia , author Z. Lin , author Y. Huang , \ and\ author X. Duan ,\ title title Nanowire Electronics: From Nanoscale to Macroscale , \ 10.1021/ACS.CHEMREV.9B00164 journal journal Chemical Reviews \ volume 119 ,\ pages 9074--9135 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

    doi

  12. [20]

    Minehisa , author R

    author author K. Minehisa , author R. Murakami , author H. Hashimoto , author K. Nakama , author K. Sakaguchi , author R. Tsutsumi , author T. Tanigawa , author M. Yukimune , author K. Nagashima , author T. Yanagida , author S. Sato , author S. Hiura , author A. Murayama , \ a...

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author K. Q. \ Peng \ and\ author S. T. \ Lee ,\ title title Silicon Nanowires for Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conversion , \ 10.1002/ADMA.201002410 journal journal Advanced Materials \ volume 23 ,\ pages 198--215 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  14. [22]

    Amato \ and\ author R

    author author M. Amato \ and\ author R. Rurali ,\ title title Surface physics of semiconducting nanowires , \ 10.1016/J.PROGSURF.2015.11.001 journal journal Progress in Surface Science \ volume 91 ,\ pages 1--28 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  15. [23]

    author author H. A. \ Fonseka , author P. Caroff , author Y. Guo , author A. M. \ Sanchez , author H. H. \ Tan , \ and\ author C. Jagadish ,\ title title Engineering the Side Facets of Vertical [100] Oriented InP Nanowires for Novel Radial Heterostructures , \ 10.1186/s11671-0...

    doi

  16. [24]

    author author V. V. \ Fedorov , author Y. Berdnikov , author N. V. \ Sibirev , author A. D. \ Bolshakov , author S. V. \ Fedina , author G. A. \ Sapunov , author L. N. \ Dvoretckaia , author G. Cirlin , author D. A. \ Kirilenko , author M. Tchernycheva , \ and\ author I. S. \ ...

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author D. E. \ Aspnes \ and\ author A. A. \ Studna ,\ title title Dielectric functions and optical parameters of Si, Ge, GaP, GaAs, GaSb, InP, InAs, and InSb from 1.5 to 6.0 eV , \ 10.1103/PhysRevB.27.985 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 27 ,\ pages 985 ( year...

    doi

  18. [26]

    Pevere , author F

    author author F. Pevere , author F. Sangghaleh , author B. Bruhn , author I. Sychugov , \ and\ author J. Linnros ,\ title title Rapid Trapping as the Origin of Nonradiative Recombination in Semiconductor Nanocrystals , \ 10.1021/ACSPHOTONICS.8B00581/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/PH-2018-...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Niemeyer , author P

    author author M. Niemeyer , author P. Kleinschmidt , author A. W. \ Walker , author L. E. \ Mundt , author C. Timm , author R. Lang , author T. Hannappel , \ and\ author D. Lackner ,\ title title Measurement of the non-radiative minority recombination lifetime and the effectiv...

    doi

  20. [28]

    Furthmeier , author F

    author author S. Furthmeier , author F. Dirnberger , author J. Hubmann , author B. Bauer , author T. Korn , author C. Sch \" u ller , author J. Zweck , author E. Reiger , \ and\ author D. Bougeard ,\ title title Long exciton lifetimes in stacking-fault-free wurtzite GaAs nanow...

    doi

  21. [29]

    author author H. J. \ Joyce , author Q. Gao , author H. H. \ Tan , author C. Jagadish , author Y. Kim , author M. A. \ Fickenscher , author S. Perera , author T. B. \ Hoang , author L. M. \ Smith , author H. E. \ Jackson , author J. M. \ Yarrison-Rice , author X. Zhang , \ and...

    doi

  22. [30]

    Plissard , author G

    author author S. Plissard , author G. Larrieu , author X. Wallart , \ and\ author P. Caroff ,\ title title High yield of self-catalyzed GaAs nanowire arrays grown on silicon via gallium dropletpositioning , \ 10.1088/0957-4484/22/27/275602 journal journal Nanotechnology \ volu...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Kim , author H

    author author Y. Kim , author H. J. \ Joyce , author Q. Gao , author H. Hoe Tan , author C. Jagadish , author M. Paladugu , author J. Zou , \ and\ author A. A. \ Suvorova ,\ title title Influence of Nanowire Density on the Shape and Optical Properties of Ternary InGaAs Nanowir...

    doi

  24. [32]

    author author H. C. \ Casey , author D. D. \ Sell , author K. W. \ Wecht , author A. Phys Lett , \ and\ author H. C. \ Casey Jr ,\ title title Concentration dependence of the absorption coefficient for n and p type GaAs between 1.3 and 1.6 eV , \ 10.1063/1.321330 journal journ...

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.