REVIEW 2 cited by
Learning Decision Trees and Forests with Algorithmic Recourse
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper proposes a new algorithm for learning accurate tree-based models while ensuring the existence of recourse actions. Algorithmic Recourse (AR) aims to provide a recourse action for altering the undesired prediction result given by a model. Typical AR methods provide a reasonable action by solving an optimization task of minimizing the required effort among executable actions. In practice, however, such actions do not always exist for models optimized only for predictive performance. To alleviate this issue, we formulate the task of learning an accurate classification tree under the constraint of ensuring the existence of reasonable actions for as many instances as possible. Then, we propose an efficient top-down greedy algorithm by leveraging the adversarial training techniques. We also show that our proposed algorithm can be applied to the random forest, which is known as a popular framework for learning tree ensembles. Experimental results demonstrated that our method successfully provided reasonable actions to more instances than the baselines without significantly degrading accuracy and computational efficiency.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Algorithmic Recourse of In-Context Learning for Tabular Data
The paper delivers the first theoretical analysis and practical zeroth-order framework for algorithmic recourse under in-context learning for tabular prediction.
-
From Search To Sampling: Generative Models For Robust Algorithmic Recourse
GenRe trains an autoregressive transformer on pairs sampled from positive examples with probability proportional to exp(-lambda * cost), and generates recourse by forward sampling, outperforming search-based baselines.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.