pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20434 · v1 · pith:JFFQ6PNSnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

The Hubble tension: A decade review

Rong-Gen Cai , Shao-Jiang Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 16:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords Hubble tensioncosmologyinteracting dark energysound horizondistance ladderLambdaCDMcosmic microwave background
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Hubble tension has become a crisis for the standard cosmological model, persisting across early and late Universe probes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review argues that the mismatch in the current expansion rate of the Universe between early-Universe and late-Universe measurements amounts to a genuine crisis in the LambdaCDM model. The discrepancy holds up when swapping out Planck CMB data for other early-Universe observations and when replacing distance-ladder methods with other late-Universe techniques. Local explanations such as a Hubble bubble or cosmic void have already been ruled out as significant contributors. The paper therefore turns to interacting dark energy models that either combine early-time and late-time changes or act at the transition scales from inhomogeneity to homogeneity. Readers should care because these findings imply that the concordant model guiding cosmology for decades requires substantial new physics.

Core claim

The Hubble-constant tension has likely become a real crisis for modern cosmology, with the discrepancy persisting regardless of whether the early-Universe observations depend on Planck CMB or not, and the late-Universe measurements depend on distance ladders at all. If the tension originates from a different early Universe, resolutions require shrinking the sound horizon by altering early expansion or recombination histories while necessitating modifications to both primordial and late Universe. If it arises from a different late Universe, resolutions change the absolute magnitude of supernovae either intrinsically or effectively, both of which have been strongly constrained by inverse dista

What carries the argument

Interacting dark energy models that combine early-time and late-time modifications or operate at the transition from inhomogeneity to homogeneity scales.

If this is right

  • Early-Universe resolutions must shrink the sound horizon while also modifying both the primordial and late Universe.
  • Late-Universe resolutions must alter supernova absolute magnitudes in ways already constrained by inverse distance ladders and the cosmic distance duality relation.
  • Local void or bubble explanations are ruled out as significant contributors.
  • Interacting dark energy models remain as the viable class of alternatives that can combine early and late modifications or act at transition scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These models might also ease the sigma-8 tension in large-scale structure if the interaction affects perturbation growth.
  • Future surveys measuring the sound horizon at high redshift could distinguish early-time modifications from transition-scale ones.
  • The persistence of the tension across independent probes suggests the need to revisit how dark components interact over cosmic history rather than isolated fixes.

Load-bearing premise

A local Hubble bubble or cosmic void does not contribute significantly to the observed tension.

What would settle it

A new, independent measurement of the Hubble constant that brings early-Universe and late-Universe values into agreement without any model changes would falsify the crisis claim.

read the original abstract

Ever since the new millennium, precision cosmology has forged the $\Lambda$-cold-dark-matter ($\Lambda$CDM) model as the standard model of concordant cosmology, withstanding various tests except for an ever-enlarging discrepancy between early-Universe observations and late-Universe measurements on the current Hubble expansion rate of our observable Universe. This Hubble-constant tension has likely become a real crisis for modern cosmology, with the discrepancy persisting regardless of whether the early-Universe observations depend on \textit{Planck} CMB or not, and the late-Universe measurements depend on distance ladders at all. If the Hubble tension originates from a different early Universe, its resolutions pertain to shrinking the sound horizon by altering either early expansion or recombination histories, but at the same time necessitating modifications to both primordial and late Universe altogether. Alternatively, if the Hubble tension arises from a different late Universe, its resolutions operate by changing the absolute magnitude of supernovae either intrinsically or effectively, both of which have been strongly constrained by the inverse distance ladders with the cosmic distance duality relation. The remaining options seem to turn to our local Universe, but a local Hubble bubble or cosmic void solution has long been ruled out as a significant contribution to the Hubble tension. In view of this dilemma, we review in this paper alternative resolutions involving interacting dark energy models, either combining early-time and late-time modifications or operating at the transition from inhomogeneity to homogeneity scales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review paper on the Hubble constant tension in cosmology. It claims that the discrepancy between early-Universe (e.g., Planck CMB) and late-Universe (e.g., distance-ladder) measurements has grown into a crisis for ΛCDM, persisting independently of those specific probes; that local solutions such as a Hubble bubble or cosmic void have been ruled out; and that viable resolutions therefore require interacting dark energy models capable of combining early-time and late-time modifications or operating across the inhomogeneity-to-homogeneity transition.

Significance. As a synthesis of a decade of literature, the review would be useful for consolidating evidence that the tension is robust across datasets and for directing attention toward interacting dark-energy scenarios. No new derivations, datasets, or machine-checked results are presented; the value lies in the narrative framing and literature compilation rather than in original quantitative predictions.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'a local Hubble bubble or cosmic void solution has long been ruled out as a significant contribution' is load-bearing for the claim that the tension constitutes a crisis independent of local effects. The review must explicitly cite and briefly summarize the key observational or simulation results (with section references) that establish this exclusion, rather than treating it as settled background.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces 'interacting dark energy models' as the remaining option but does not preview the specific interaction Lagrangians or parameter ranges to be reviewed; adding one sentence would improve clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comment on the abstract. We agree that the claim regarding local solutions requires explicit supporting citations and a brief summary to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'a local Hubble bubble or cosmic void solution has long been ruled out as a significant contribution' is load-bearing for the claim that the tension constitutes a crisis independent of local effects. The review must explicitly cite and briefly summarize the key observational or simulation results (with section references) that establish this exclusion, rather than treating it as settled background.

    Authors: We agree that this statement in the abstract would benefit from explicit citations and a concise summary. In the revised version we will insert references to key observational constraints (e.g., from SDSS and DESI BAO analyses showing no evidence for a sufficiently large local underdensity) and to N-body simulations (e.g., those demonstrating that voids of the required size are incompatible with the observed galaxy distribution and CMB isotropy). We will add a parenthetical reference to the section of the main text where local solutions are reviewed in detail. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no internal derivations or load-bearing self-citations

full rationale

The manuscript is explicitly a literature review that synthesizes the status of the Hubble tension from prior work. No original equations, derivations, parameter fits, or model constructions are advanced within the paper itself. All quantitative claims (persistence of tension independent of Planck or distance ladders; ruling out local Hubble bubble/void solutions; constraints from inverse distance ladders and cosmic distance duality) are presented as summaries of external literature. The review structure attributes resolutions to interacting dark energy models to the broader field rather than deriving them here. Per the hard rules, a review whose central content is externally benchmarked receives a low score; any incidental self-citations are not load-bearing for a derivation chain that does not exist.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review based solely on the abstract, the paper introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities of its own.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5778 in / 987 out tokens · 24442 ms · 2026-06-26T16:01:36.823350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 77 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Di Valentino, A

    E. Di Valentino, A. Melchiorri and J. Silk,Reconciling Planck with the local value ofH 0 in extended parameter space,Phys. Lett.B761(2016) 242–246, [1606.00634]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  2. [2]

    Karwal and M

    T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski,Dark energy at early times, the Hubble parameter, and the string axiverse,Phys. Rev.D94(2016) 103523, [1608.01309]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    R. B. Tully,The Hubble Constant: A Historical Review,2305.11950. – 47 – [4]HSTcollaboration, W. L. Freedman et al.,Final results from the Hubble Space Telescope key project to measure the Hubble constant,Astrophys. J.553(2001) 47–72, [astro-ph/0012376]

    arXiv 2001

  4. [4]

    Moresco et al.,Unveiling the Universe with emerging cosmological probes,Living Rev

    M. Moresco et al.,Unveiling the Universe with emerging cosmological probes,Living Rev. Rel. 25(2022) 6, [2201.07241]. [6]Planckcollaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al.,Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.571(2014) A16, [1303.5076]. [7]WMAPcollaboration, G. Hinshaw et al.,Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Obser...

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    A. G. Riess, L. Macri, S. Casertano, H. Lampeitl, H. C. Ferguson, A. V. Filippenko et al.,A 3% Solution: Determination of the Hubble Constant with the Hubble Space Telescope and Wide Field Camera 3,Astrophys. J.730(2011) 119, [1103.2976]. [9]Planckcollaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al.,Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.594(2...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    A. G. Riess et al.,A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant, Astrophys. J.826(2016) 56, [1604.01424]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    A. G. Riess et al.,Milky Way Cepheid Standards for Measuring Cosmic Distances and Application to Gaia DR2: Implications for the Hubble Constant,Astrophys. J.861(2018) 126, [1804.10655]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    A. G. Riess et al.,New Parallaxes of Galactic Cepheids from Spatially Scanning the Hubble Space Telescope: Implications for the Hubble Constant,Astrophys. J.855(2018) 136, [1801.01120]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, L. M. Macri and D. Scolnic,Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics Beyond LambdaCDM,Astrophys. J.876(2019) 85, [1903.07603]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    A. G. Riess, S. Casertano, W. Yuan, J. B. Bowers, L. Macri, J. C. Zinn et al.,Cosmic Distances Calibrated to 1% Precision with Gaia EDR3 Parallaxes and Hubble Space Telescope Photometry of 75 Milky Way Cepheids Confirm Tension withΛCDM,Astrophys. J. Lett.908 (2021) L6, [2012.08534]

    arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    A. G. Riess et al.,A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team, Astrophys. J. Lett.934(2022) L7, [2112.04510]. [16]Planckcollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [1807.06209]. [1...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    R.-G. Cai, L. Li and S.-J. Wang,Hubble-constant crisis,Acta Phys. Sin.72(2023) 239801

    2023

  13. [13]

    J. L. Bernal, L. Verde and A. G. Riess,The trouble withH 0,JCAP1610(2016) 019, [1607.05617]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  14. [14]

    Verde, T

    L. Verde, T. Treu and A. G. Riess,Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe,Nature Astron.3(7, 2019) 891, [1907.10625]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Knox and M

    L. Knox and M. Millea,Hubble constant hunter’s guide,Phys. Rev.D101(2020) 043533, [1908.03663]. – 48 –

    arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    A. G. Riess,The Expansion of the Universe is Faster than Expected,Nature Rev. Phys.2 (2019) 10–12, [2001.03624]

    arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    W. L. Freedman,Measurements of the Hubble Constant: Tensions in Perspective,Astrophys. J.919(2021) 16, [2106.15656]

    arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Perivolaropoulos and F

    L. Perivolaropoulos and F. Skara,Challenges forΛCDM: An update,New Astron. Rev.95 (2022) 101659, [2105.05208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Bull et al.,BeyondΛCDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead,Phys

    P. Bull et al.,BeyondΛCDM: Problems, solutions, and the road ahead,Phys. Dark Univ.12 (2016) 56–99, [1512.05356]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Di Valentino et al.,Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension,Astropart

    E. Di Valentino et al.,Snowmass2021 - Letter of interest cosmology intertwined II: The hubble constant tension,Astropart. Phys.131(2021) 102605, [2008.11284]

    arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Di Valentino, O

    E. Di Valentino, O. Mena, S. Pan, L. Visinelli, W. Yang, A. Melchiorri et al.,In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of solutions,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 153001, [2103.01183]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Sch¨ oneberg, G

    N. Sch¨ oneberg, G. Franco Abell´ an, A. P´ erez S´ anchez, S. J. Witte, V. Poulin and J. Lesgourgues,The H0 Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models,Phys. Rept.984(2022) 1–55, [2107.10291]

    arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    P. Shah, P. Lemos and O. Lahav,A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant,Astron. Astrophys. Rev.29(2021) 9, [2109.01161]

    arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    E. Abdalla et al.,Cosmology intertwined: A review of the particle physics, astrophysics, and cosmology associated with the cosmological tensions and anomalies,JHEAp34(2022) 49–211, [2203.06142]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Poulin, T

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith and T. Karwal,The Ups and Downs of Early Dark Energy solutions to the Hubble tension: A review of models, hints and constraints circa 2023,Phys. Dark Univ. 42(2023) 101348, [2302.09032]

    arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Hu and F.-Y

    J.-P. Hu and F.-Y. Wang,Hubble Tension: The Evidence of New Physics,Universe9(2023) 94, [2302.05709]

    arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Vagnozzi,Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension,Universe9(2023) 393, [2308.16628]

    S. Vagnozzi,Seven Hints That Early-Time New Physics Alone Is Not Sufficient to Solve the Hubble Tension,Universe9(2023) 393, [2308.16628]. [34]CosmoVerse Networkcollaboration, E. Di Valentino et al.,The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics,Phys. Dark Univ.49(2025) 101965, [2504.01669]

    arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Aylor, M

    K. Aylor, M. Joy, L. Knox, M. Millea, S. Raghunathan and W. L. K. Wu,Sounds Discordant: Classical Distance Ladder\&ΛCDM -based Determinations of the Cosmological Sound Horizon,Astrophys. J.874(2019) 4, [1811.00537]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  29. [29]

    Jiang, D

    J.-Q. Jiang, D. Pedrotti, S. S. da Costa and S. Vagnozzi,Nonparametric late-time expansion history reconstruction and implications for the Hubble tension in light of recent DESI and type Ia supernovae data,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 123519, [2408.02365]

    arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Krishnan, E

    C. Krishnan, E. O. Colg´ ain, Ruchika, A. A. Sen, M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari and T. Yang,Is there an early Universe solution to Hubble tension?,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 103525, [2002.06044]

    arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    Jedamzik, L

    K. Jedamzik, L. Pogosian and G.-B. Zhao,Why reducing the cosmic sound horizon alone can not fully resolve the Hubble tension,Commun. in Phys.4(2021) 123, [2010.04158]

    arXiv 2021

  32. [32]

    J. C. Hill, E. McDonough, M. W. Toomey and S. Alexander,Early dark energy does not restore cosmological concordance,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 043507, [2003.07355]

    arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    W. Lin, X. Chen and K. J. Mack,Early Universe Physics Insensitive and Uncalibrated Cosmic Standards: Constraints onΩm and Implications for the Hubble Tension,Astrophys. J. 920(2021) 159, [2102.05701]. – 49 –

    arXiv 2021

  34. [34]

    Vagnozzi,Consistency tests ofΛCDM from the early integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect: Implications for early-time new physics and the Hubble tension,Phys

    S. Vagnozzi,Consistency tests ofΛCDM from the early integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect: Implications for early-time new physics and the Hubble tension,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 063524, [2105.10425]

    arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    O. H. E. Philcox, G. S. Farren, B. D. Sherwin, E. J. Baxter and D. J. Brout,Determining the Hubble constant without the sound horizon: A 3.6% constraint on H0 from galaxy surveys, CMB lensing, and supernovae,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063530, [2204.02984]

    arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Kamionkowski and A

    M. Kamionkowski and A. G. Riess,The Hubble Tension and Early Dark Energy,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.73(2023) 153–180, [2211.04492]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    A. R. Khalife, M. B. Zanjani, S. Galli, S. G¨ unther, J. Lesgourgues and K. Benabed,Review of Hubble tension solutions with new SH0ES and SPT-3G data,2312.09814

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Pedrotti, J.-Q

    D. Pedrotti, J.-Q. Jiang, L. A. Escamilla, S. S. da Costa and S. Vagnozzi,Multidimensionality of the Hubble tension: The roles ofΩm andωc,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 023506, [2408.04530]

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    F. J. Qu, K. M. Surrao, B. Bolliet, J. C. Hill, B. D. Sherwin, H. T. Jense et al.,Accelerated inference on accelerated cosmic expansion: New constraints on axionlike early dark energy with DESI BAO and ACT DR6 CMB lensing,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 123507, [2404.16805]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Poulin, T

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, R. Calder´ on and T. Simon,Impact of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 for early dark energy and the Hubble tension,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 063519, [2505.08051]. [48]SPT-3Gcollaboration, A. R. Khalife et al.,SPT-3G D1: Axion Early Dark Energy with CMB experiments and DESI,2507.23355

    arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Toda and O

    Y. Toda and O. Seto,Constraints on the varying electron mass and early dark energy in light of ACT DR6 and DESI DR2 and the implications for inflation,JCAP02(2026) 019, [2508.09025]

    arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    Wang and Y.-S

    H. Wang and Y.-S. Piao,Dark energy after pre-recombination early dark energy in light of DESI DR2 and the latest ACT and SPT data,2511.16606

    arXiv

  43. [43]

    Yin, G.-H

    L. Yin, G.-H. Du, T.-N. Li and X. Zhang,Joint constraints on cosmic birefringence and early dark energy from ACT, Planck, DESI, and PantheonPlus,2601.13624

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    Bella, V

    M. Bella, V. Poulin, S. Vagnozzi and L. Knox,Double the axions, half the tension: multi-field early dark energy eases the Hubble tension,2604.13535

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Braglia, W

    M. Braglia, W. T. Emond, F. Finelli, A. E. Gumrukcuoglu and K. Koyama,Unified framework for early dark energy fromα-attractors,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 083513, [2005.14053]

    arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Takahashi and W

    F. Takahashi and W. Yin,Cosmological implications of ns=1 in light of the Hubble tension, Phys. Lett. B830(2022) 137143, [2112.06710]

    arXiv 2022

  47. [47]

    Ye, J.-Q

    G. Ye, J.-Q. Jiang and Y.-S. Piao,Toward inflation with ns=1 in light of the Hubble tension and implications for primordial gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 103528, [2205.02478]

    arXiv 2022

  48. [48]

    Braglia, A

    M. Braglia, A. Linde, R. Kallosh and F. Finelli,Hybridα-attractors, primordial black holes and gravitational wave backgrounds,JCAP04(2023) 033, [2211.14262]

    arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    Lin,D-term inflation in braneworld models: Consistency with cosmic-string bounds and early-time Hubble tension resolving models,Phys

    C.-M. Lin,D-term inflation in braneworld models: Consistency with cosmic-string bounds and early-time Hubble tension resolving models,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 103511, [2204.10475]

    arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Fu and S.-J

    C. Fu and S.-J. Wang,Reconciling early dark energy with a Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) L041304, [2310.12932]

    arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    C. Fu, D. Lu and S.-J. Wang,Harrison-Zeldovich attractor: From Planck to ACT results, Phys. Rev. D113(2026) L081304, [2510.24682]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Poulin, T

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski,Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 221301, [1811.04083]. – 50 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  53. [53]

    Niedermann and M

    F. Niedermann and M. S. Sloth,New early dark energy,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) L041303, [1910.10739]

    arXiv 2021

  54. [54]

    Niedermann and M

    F. Niedermann and M. S. Sloth,Resolving the Hubble tension with new early dark energy, Phys. Rev.D102(2020) 063527, [2006.06686]

    arXiv 2020

  55. [55]

    Ye and Y.-S

    G. Ye and Y.-S. Piao,Is the Hubble tension a hint of AdS phase around recombination?,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 083507, [2001.02451]

    arXiv 2020

  56. [56]

    G. Ye, B. Hu and Y.-S. Piao,Implication of the Hubble tension for the primordial Universe in light of recent cosmological data,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 063510, [2103.09729]

    arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Jiang and Y.-S

    J.-Q. Jiang and Y.-S. Piao,Toward early dark energy and ns=1 with Planck, ACT, and SPT observations,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 103514, [2202.13379]

    arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Jiang, G

    J.-Q. Jiang, G. Ye and Y.-S. Piao,Return of Harrison-Zeldovich spectrum in light of recent cosmological tensions,2210.06125

    arXiv

  59. [59]

    Peng and Y.-S

    Z.-Y. Peng and Y.-S. Piao,Testing then s −H 0 scaling relation with Planck-independent CMB data,2308.01012

    arXiv

  60. [60]

    Vattis, S

    K. Vattis, S. M. Koushiappas and A. Loeb,Dark matter decaying in the late Universe can relieve the H0 tension,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 121302, [1903.06220]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  61. [61]

    K. L. Pandey, T. Karwal and S. Das,Alleviating theH 0 andσ 8 anomalies with a decaying dark matter model,JCAP07(2020) 026, [1902.10636]

    arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    S. J. Clark, K. Vattis and S. M. Koushiappas,Cosmological constraints on late-universe decaying dark matter as a solution to theH 0 tension,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 043014, [2006.03678]

    arXiv 2021

  63. [63]

    Di Valentino et al.,Cosmology intertwined III:f σ 8 andS 8,Astropart

    E. Di Valentino et al.,Cosmology intertwined III:f σ 8 andS 8,Astropart. Phys.131(2021) 102604, [2008.11285]

    arXiv 2021

  64. [64]

    Poulin, J

    V. Poulin, J. L. Bernal, E. D. Kovetz and M. Kamionkowski,Sigma-8 tension is a drag,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 123538, [2209.06217]

    arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Nguyen, D

    N.-M. Nguyen, D. Huterer and Y. Wen,Evidence for Suppression of Structure Growth in the Concordance Cosmological Model,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 111001, [2302.01331]

    arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Poulin, T

    V. Poulin, T. L. Smith, R. Calder´ on and T. Simon,Implications of the cosmic calibration tension beyond H0 and the synergy between early- and late-time new physics,Phys. Rev. D 111(2025) 083552, [2407.18292]

    arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Benevento, W

    G. Benevento, W. Hu and M. Raveri,Can Late Dark Energy Transitions Raise the Hubble constant?,Phys. Rev.D101(2020) 103517, [2002.11707]

    arXiv 2020

  68. [68]

    Camarena and V

    D. Camarena and V. Marra,On the use of the local prior on the absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae in cosmological inference,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.504(2021) 5164–5171, [2101.08641]

    arXiv 2021

  69. [69]

    Efstathiou,To H0 or not to H0?,Mon

    G. Efstathiou,To H0 or not to H0?,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.505(2021) 3866–3872, [2103.08723]

    arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    Cai, Z.-K

    R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, S.-J. Wang, W.-W. Yu and Y. Zhou,No-go guide for the Hubble tension: Late-time solutions,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) L021301, [2107.13286]

    arXiv 2022

  71. [71]

    Cai, Z.-K

    R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, S.-J. Wang, W.-W. Yu and Y. Zhou,No-go guide for late-time solutions to the Hubble tension: Matter perturbations,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063519, [2202.12214]

    arXiv 2022

  72. [72]

    R. E. Keeley and A. Shafieloo,Ruling Out New Physics at Low Redshift as a Solution to the H0 Tension,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 111002, [2206.08440]

    arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    Huang, S.-J

    L. Huang, S.-J. Wang and W.-W. Yu,No-go guide for the Hubble tension: Late-time or local-scale new physics,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68(2025) 220413, [2401.14170]. – 51 –

    arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Huang, R.-G

    L. Huang, R.-G. Cai, S.-J. Wang, J.-Q. Liu and Y.-H. Yao,Narrowing down the Hubble tension to the first two rungs of distance ladders,Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron.68(2025) 280405, [2410.06053]

    arXiv 2025

  75. [75]

    Ling, G.-H

    J.-L. Ling, G.-H. Du, T.-N. Li, J.-F. Zhang, S.-J. Wang and X. Zhang,Model-independent cosmological inference after the DESI DR2 data with improved inverse distance ladder,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 083528, [2505.22369]

    arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Wang and S.-J

    J.-Q. Wang and S.-J. Wang,Cosmological intercept tension, in25th Hellenic School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity, 4, 2026.2604.28013

    arXiv 2026

  77. [77]

    A. J. Cuesta, L. Verde, A. Riess and R. Jimenez,Calibrating the cosmic distance scale ladder: the role of the sound horizon scale and the local expansion rate as distance anchors,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.448(2015) 3463–3471, [1411.1094]

    arXiv 2015

  78. [78]

    Heavens, R

    A. Heavens, R. Jimenez and L. Verde,Standard rulers, candles, and clocks from the low-redshift Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 241302, [1409.6217]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  79. [79]

    Aubourg et al.,Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, Phys

    E. Aubourg et al.,Cosmological implications of baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, Phys. Rev.D92(2015) 123516, [1411.1074]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  80. [80]

    Verde, J

    L. Verde, J. L. Bernal, A. F. Heavens and R. Jimenez,The length of the low-redshift standard ruler,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.467(2017) 731–736, [1607.05297]. [89]BOSScollaboration, S. Alam et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological analysis of the DR12 galaxy sample, Mon. Not. Roy. As...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

Showing first 80 references.