pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.21522 · v1 · pith:JGZGSJDGnew · submitted 2026-06-19 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-ph

Asymptotically safe quantum gravity and its phenomenology -- a review

Astrid Eichhorn This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 13:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-ph
keywords asymptotically safe gravityReuter fixed pointquantum scale symmetryfunctional renormalization groupquantum gravity phenomenologyLorentzian signaturematter couplings
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Reuter fixed point realizes quantum scale symmetry, making gravity a predictive quantum field theory across all scales.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review surveys the accumulating evidence that asymptotically safe quantum gravity can describe the quantum nature of gravity within quantum field theory. Compelling support for the Reuter fixed point first appeared in four-dimensional Euclidean pure gravity, then extended to matter fields including the Standard Model, and most recently incorporated Lorentzian signature. Quantum scale symmetry in the ultraviolet renders the theory highly predictive, yielding concrete implications for particle physics, black holes, and cosmology that can confront observations. The review also examines links to other quantum gravity approaches.

Core claim

The central claim is that compelling evidence for quantum scale symmetry exists in four-dimensional Euclidean pure gravity via the Reuter fixed point, with increasingly conclusive evidence when matter fields are included and when Lorentzian spacetime signature is accounted for, making the approach predictive at all scales.

What carries the argument

The Reuter fixed point, a non-trivial ultraviolet fixed point of the renormalization group flow that enforces quantum scale symmetry.

If this is right

  • The fixed point determines the running of couplings, yielding predictions for particle physics observables.
  • Black hole solutions acquire specific properties fixed by the ultraviolet behavior.
  • Cosmological evolution is constrained by the scale symmetry, affecting early-universe dynamics.
  • Universal features may emerge when connecting to other quantum gravity frameworks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fixed point survives in complete dynamical matter systems, the theory could describe gravity plus the Standard Model with no extra degrees of freedom.
  • High-precision measurements of coupling running at collider or cosmic-ray energies could directly probe the predicted scale dependence.
  • Improved Lorentzian calculations might reveal whether signature affects the fixed-point structure in observable ways.

Load-bearing premise

The functional renormalization group truncations used in the reviewed studies are sufficient to establish the existence and robustness of the Reuter fixed point.

What would settle it

A higher-order truncation or non-perturbative lattice simulation that finds no non-Gaussian fixed point with the reported critical exponents would falsify the central evidence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21522 by Astrid Eichhorn.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. We sketch how beta functions suffice to translate a given UV value of a coupling into its IR value. However, without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Illustration of the critical hypersurface (in purple) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. For purposes of illustration, we consider two beta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Using the simple beta functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. We illustrate the RG flow of a coupling through an [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. We show a schematic illustration of how to obtain the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. In a rank-3 tensor model, a tensor invariant, such as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. We show the RG flow in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. The three expansions of the effective action are related to each other. From the canonical expansion, one obtains [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. We show the RG flow in the Einstein-Hilbert trun [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. We show the residues of the poles that arise in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. We show the real part of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. We show the spectral function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. We show a coupling which has a non-zero fixed-point value and corresponds to an irrelevant direction, such that [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. We show a coupling which has a non-zero fixed-point value and corresponds to an irrelevant direction, such that its [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Transplanckian region: Screening effects dominate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Due to the tiny critical exponents in Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. We show the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. This figure is reproduced from [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. We show the critical hypersurface (purple surface) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_20.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Asymptotically safe quantum gravity is an approach to quantum gravity. It is based on the premise that quantum field theory can describe the quantum nature of gravity in our universe. At its core lies quantum scale symmetry. This review provides an introduction to the key ideas of the approach and surveys the current status of the field. Over the last years, the field has taken large strides towards an increasingly realistic setting: First, compelling evidence for quantum scale symmetry exists in four-dimensional, Euclidean, pure gravity, establishing the Reuter fixed point robustly. Second, matter fields, including the Standard Model as well as beyond-Standard-Model-candidates, have been studied in depth, with increasingly conclusive evidence for quantum scale symmetry. Most recently, the final gap to a realistic description of quantum gravity is being closed, because Lorentzian spacetime signature can now be accounted for. As a consequence of quantum scale symmetry in the ultraviolet, the approach is highly predictive at all scales. This review discusses the physics of asymptotic safety across all scales. Predictive power for particle physics, black holes and cosmology provides a clear pathway to confronting quantum gravity with current and near-future observations. The review closes by discussing the connection to other approaches to quantum gravity. It advocates the perspective that such connections between approaches may lead us to an understanding of universal physical features of quantum gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. This review surveys asymptotically safe quantum gravity based on the functional renormalization group. It claims compelling evidence for the Reuter fixed point in four-dimensional Euclidean pure gravity, increasingly conclusive evidence when matter fields (including the Standard Model) are included, and recent progress in incorporating Lorentzian signature. The review argues that quantum scale symmetry renders the theory predictive across scales and discusses implications for particle physics, black holes, and cosmology, while connecting to other quantum-gravity approaches.

Significance. If the summarized FRG results hold, the review provides a coherent overview of a predictive quantum-gravity framework with direct phenomenological consequences, including potential tests against observations. It explicitly credits the accumulation of truncation studies and the extension to Lorentzian signature as steps toward realism.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion of 'compelling evidence' and 'robustly' establishing the Reuter fixed point in 4D Euclidean pure gravity is load-bearing for the review's narrative of progress. The manuscript should cite explicit convergence diagnostics (e.g., stability of critical exponents under successive enlargements of the derivative or vertex expansion) from the referenced works rather than summarizing them as settled.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph on Lorentzian signature): The claim that Lorentzian signature 'can now be accounted for' and closes 'the final gap' rests on analytic continuation or Wick-rotation procedures whose domain of validity for the fixed-point structure is not independently demonstrated. A concrete test (e.g., comparison of Euclidean and Lorentzian critical exponents within the same truncation) should be referenced or discussed to substantiate robustness.
minor comments (1)
  1. The review would benefit from a dedicated subsection summarizing the range of truncation orders and approximation schemes employed across the cited literature, to allow readers to assess the strength of the evidence directly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to improve precision where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion of 'compelling evidence' and 'robustly' establishing the Reuter fixed point in 4D Euclidean pure gravity is load-bearing for the review's narrative of progress. The manuscript should cite explicit convergence diagnostics (e.g., stability of critical exponents under successive enlargements of the derivative or vertex expansion) from the referenced works rather than summarizing them as settled.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from more explicit references to convergence diagnostics. In the revised version we will add citations to specific works that report the stability of critical exponents under enlargements of the derivative expansion and vertex expansion, allowing readers to consult the underlying truncation studies directly. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph on Lorentzian signature): The claim that Lorentzian signature 'can now be accounted for' and closes 'the final gap' rests on analytic continuation or Wick-rotation procedures whose domain of validity for the fixed-point structure is not independently demonstrated. A concrete test (e.g., comparison of Euclidean and Lorentzian critical exponents within the same truncation) should be referenced or discussed to substantiate robustness.

    Authors: The review summarizes recent literature on Lorentzian signature via analytic continuation. We will revise the abstract and add a reference to a study that compares critical exponents in Euclidean and Lorentzian settings within comparable truncations, thereby addressing the request for a concrete test of robustness. We note that such direct comparisons are still limited in scope within the current literature. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper presents no internal derivation chain; claims summarize external literature without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a review surveying the status of asymptotically safe quantum gravity. It states claims such as 'compelling evidence for quantum scale symmetry exists in four-dimensional, Euclidean, pure gravity, establishing the Reuter fixed point robustly' but does not derive any new quantities, fixed points, or critical exponents from its own equations or truncations. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to the paper's inputs, and the provided text contains no equations or self-citations that function as the sole justification for a central result. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as a literature survey with no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The review rests on the functional renormalization group framework and the assumption that truncated calculations capture the ultraviolet fixed point; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Existence and robustness of the Reuter fixed point under functional renormalization group flow in truncated gravity-matter systems
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the basis for quantum scale symmetry and predictivity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5762 in / 1208 out tokens · 20738 ms · 2026-06-26T13:29:14.577785+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 139 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Towards a relation to tensor models and (causal) dynamical triangulations See Sec. IV. In these frameworks, the discretization is explicitly introduced as a regularization and so the theory only has a physical limit if a universal regime, i.e., asymptotic safety, exists. This does not guarantee that the universality class has to be that of the Reuter fixe...

  2. [2]

    The Lorentzian path integral over all geometries becomes a Lorentzian path integral over all causal sets, which are discrete causal orders, see

    Towards a relation to causal sets Causal sets are traditionally viewed as a fundamentally discrete approach [251]. The Lorentzian path integral over all geometries becomes a Lorentzian path integral over all causal sets, which are discrete causal orders, see

  3. [3]

    fundamental

    for a review. Nevertheless, there is no conceptual issue with re-interpreting the discreteness as a regulariza- tion. Most interestingly, it then constitutes a regulariza- tion of Lorentzian, not Euclidean geometries. This makes the search for a universal continuum limit, i.e., a higher- order phase transition, in this setting highly relevant, be- cause i...

    2026

  4. [4]

    Niedermaier and M

    M. Niedermaier and M. Reuter, Living Rev. Rel.9, 5 (2006)

    2006

  5. [5]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig, New J. Phys.14, 055022 (2012), arXiv:1202.2274 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    Eichhorn, Front

    A. Eichhorn, Front. Astron. Space Sci.5, 47 (2019), arXiv:1810.07615 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    A. D. Pereira, inProgress and Visions in Quantum The- ory in View of Gravity: Bridging foundations of physics and mathematics(2019) arXiv:1904.07042 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert, Front. in Phys.8, 551848 (2021), arXiv:2007.10353 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Eichhorn, Nuovo Cim

    A. Eichhorn, Nuovo Cim. C45, 29 (2022), arXiv:2201.11543 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Eichhorn, Nature Phys.19, 1527 (2023)

    A. Eichhorn, Nature Phys.19, 1527 (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    Percacci,An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety, 100 Years of General Relativity, Vol

    R. Percacci,An Introduction to Covariant Quantum Gravity and Asymptotic Safety, 100 Years of General Relativity, Vol. 3 (World Scientific, 2017)

    2017

  12. [12]

    Reuter and F

    M. Reuter and F. Saueressig,Quantum Gravity and the Functional Renormalization Group: The Road towards Asymptotic Safety(Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    Asymptotic safety of gravity with matter,

    A. Eichhorn and M. Schiffer, “Asymptotic safety of gravity with matter,” inHandbook of Quantum Grav- ity, edited by C. Bambi, L. Modesto, and I. Shapiro (Springer Nature Singapore, 2024) Chap. Asymptoti- cally Safe Quantum Gravity, pp. 915–1001

    2024

  14. [14]

    Eichhorn and A

    A. Eichhorn and A. Held, (2022), arXiv:2212.09495 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2022

  15. [15]

    Quantum Gravity and Scale Symmetry in Cosmology,

    C. Wetterich, “Quantum Gravity and Scale Symmetry in Cosmology,” (2023) arXiv:2211.03596 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Form factors in asymptotically safe quantum gravity,

    B. Knorr, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig, “Form factors in asymptotically safe quantum gravity,” inHandbook of Quantum Gravity, edited by C. Bambi, L. Modesto, and I. Shapiro (Springer Nature Singapore, 2024) pp. 1–49

    2024

  17. [17]

    The Functional f(R) Ap- proximation,

    T. R. Morris and D. Stulga, “The Functional f(R) Ap- proximation,” (2023) arXiv:2210.11356 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Per- turbative Approaches to Nonperturbative Quantum Gravity,

    R. Martini, G. P. Vacca, and O. Zanusso, “Per- turbative Approaches to Nonperturbative Quantum Gravity,” inHandbook of Quantum Gravity, edited by C. Bambi, L. Modesto, and I. Shapiro (2024) pp. 1–46, arXiv:2210.13910 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Quantum Gravity from Dynamical Metric Fluctuations,

    J. M. Pawlowski and M. Reichert, “Quantum Gravity from Dynamical Metric Fluctuations,” inHandbook of Quantum Gravity(Springer Nature Singapore, 2024) pp. 761–830, arXiv:2309.10785 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    The functional renormalization group in quantum gravity,

    F. Saueressig, “The functional renormalization group in quantum gravity,” inHandbook of Quantum Grav- ity, edited by C. Bambi, L. Modesto, and I. Shapiro (Springer Singapore, 2024) pp. 717–760

    2024

  21. [21]

    Black Holes in Asymptotically Safe Grav- ity,

    A. Platania, “Black Holes in Asymptotically Safe Grav- ity,” (2023) arXiv:2302.04272 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Asymptotic Safety and Cosmology,

    A. Bonanno, “Asymptotic Safety and Cosmology,” (2024)

    2024

  23. [23]

    Eichhorn, in57th International School of Subnu- clear Physics: In Search for the Unexpected(2020) arXiv:2003.00044 [gr-qc]

    A. Eichhorn, in57th International School of Subnu- clear Physics: In Search for the Unexpected(2020) arXiv:2003.00044 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Reichert, PoS384, 005 (2020)

    M. Reichert, PoS384, 005 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    Basile, L

    I. Basile, L. Buoninfante, F. Di Filippo, B. Knorr, A. Platania, and A. Tokareva, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes98, 1 (2025), arXiv:2412.08690 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Bonanno and F

    A. Bonanno and F. Saueressig, Comptes Rendus Physique18, 254 (2017), arXiv:1702.04137 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    Bonanno, A

    A. Bonanno, A. Eichhorn, H. Gies, J. M. Pawlowski, R. Percacci, M. Reuter, F. Saueressig, and G. P. Vacca, 71 Front. in Phys.8, 269 (2020), arXiv:2004.06810 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  28. [28]

    ’t Hooft and M

    G. ’t Hooft and M. J. G. Veltman, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A20, 69 (1974)

    1974

  29. [29]

    M. H. Goroff and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B160, 81 (1985)

    1985

  30. [30]

    A. E. M. van de Ven, Nucl. Phys. B378, 309 (1992)

    1992

  31. [31]

    J. F. Donoghue, Phys. Rev. Lett.72, 2996 (1994), arXiv:gr-qc/9310024

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  32. [32]

    J. F. Donoghue, Phys. Rev. D50, 3874 (1994), arXiv:gr- qc/9405057

    arXiv 1994

  33. [33]

    Quantum General Relativity and Ef- fective Field Theory,

    J. F. Donoghue, “Quantum General Relativity and Ef- fective Field Theory,” (2023) arXiv:2211.09902 [hep- th]

    arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    Froissart, Phys

    M. Froissart, Phys. Rev.123, 1053 (1961)

    1961

  35. [35]

    Knorr, C

    B. Knorr, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig, Class. Quant. Grav.36, 234001 (2019), arXiv:1907.02903 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Draper, B

    T. Draper, B. Knorr, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 181301 (2020), arXiv:2007.00733 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Draper, B

    T. Draper, B. Knorr, C. Ripken, and F. Saueressig, JHEP11, 136 (2020), arXiv:2007.04396 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Cartographing gravity-mediated scattering ampli- tudes: scalars and photons,

    B. Knorr, S. Pirlo, C. Ripken, and F. Saueres- sig, “Cartographing gravity-mediated scattering ampli- tudes: scalars and photons,” (2022), unpublished, arXiv:2205.01738 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Pastor-Guti´ errez, J

    ´A. Pastor-Guti´ errez, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Reichert, and G. Ruisi, Phys. Rev. D111, 106005 (2025), arXiv:2412.13800 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    A. P. Chiesa, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, (2026), arXiv:2603.10168 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Knorr, (2026), arXiv:2602.21285 [hep-th]

    B. Knorr, (2026), arXiv:2602.21285 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    J. F. Donoghue, Front. in Phys.8, 56 (2020), arXiv:1911.02967 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Baldazzi, R

    A. Baldazzi, R. B. A. Zinati, and K. Falls, SciPost Phys. 13, 085 (2022), arXiv:2105.11482 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Baldazzi and K

    A. Baldazzi and K. Falls, Universe7, 294 (2021), arXiv:2107.00671 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Ultraviolet Divergences in Quantum The- ories of Gravitation,

    S. Weinberg, “Ultraviolet Divergences in Quantum The- ories of Gravitation,” inGeneral Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey(Cambridge University Press, 1980) pp. 790–831

    1980

  46. [46]

    Buccio, J

    D. Buccio, J. F. Donoghue, and R. Percacci, Phys. Rev. D109, 045008 (2024), arXiv:2307.00055 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  47. [47]

    Buccio, J

    D. Buccio, J. F. Donoghue, G. Menezes, and R. Percacci, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 021604 (2024), arXiv:2403.02397 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Buccio, G

    D. Buccio, G. P. De Brito, and L. Parente, Phys. Rev. D112, 126024 (2025), arXiv:2507.15835 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    Christiansen, B

    N. Christiansen, B. Knorr, J. M. Pawlowski, and A. Rodigast, Phys. Rev. D93, 044036 (2016), arXiv:1403.1232 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  50. [50]

    Christiansen, B

    N. Christiansen, B. Knorr, J. Meibohm, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, Phys. Rev. D92, 121501 (2015), arXiv:1506.07016 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  51. [51]

    T. Denz, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 336 (2018), arXiv:1612.07315 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  52. [52]

    Christiansen, K

    N. Christiansen, K. Falls, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Reichert, Phys. Rev. D97, 046007 (2018), arXiv:1711.09259 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    Eichhorn, P

    A. Eichhorn, P. Labus, J. M. Pawlowski, and M. Re- ichert, SciPost Phys.5, 031 (2018), arXiv:1804.00012 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Knorr and M

    B. Knorr and M. Schiffer, Universe7, 216 (2021), arXiv:2105.04566 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2021

  55. [55]

    Eichhorn, Z

    A. Eichhorn, Z. Gyftopoulos, and A. Held, (2026), arXiv:2606.07868 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    de Alwis, A

    S. de Alwis, A. Eichhorn, A. Held, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Schiffer, and F. Versteegen, Phys. Lett. B798, 134991 (2019), arXiv:1907.07894 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Percacci and G

    R. Percacci and G. P. Vacca, Class. Quant. Grav.27, 245026 (2010), arXiv:1008.3621 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    Held, Front

    A. Held, Front. in Phys.8, 341 (2020), arXiv:2003.13642 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Wetterich, Phys

    C. Wetterich, Phys. Lett. B301, 90 (1993), arXiv:1710.05815 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  60. [60]

    Gies, Lect

    H. Gies, Lect. Notes Phys.852, 287 (2012), arXiv:hep- ph/0611146

    arXiv 2012

  61. [61]

    T. R. Morris, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9, 2411 (1994), arXiv:hep-ph/9308265

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  62. [62]

    Reuter, Phys

    M. Reuter, Phys. Rev. D57, 971 (1998), arXiv:hep- th/9605030

    arXiv 1998

  63. [63]

    Codello, R

    A. Codello, R. Percacci, and C. Rahmede, Annals Phys. 324, 414 (2009), arXiv:0805.2909 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  64. [64]

    Demmel, F

    M. Demmel, F. Saueressig, and O. Zanusso, JHEP08, 113 (2015), arXiv:1504.07656 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    Falls, C

    K. Falls, C. R. King, D. F. Litim, K. Nikolakopou- los, and C. Rahmede, Phys. Rev. D97, 086006 (2018), arXiv:1801.00162 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Dupuis, L

    N. Dupuis, L. Canet, A. Eichhorn, W. Metzner, J. M. Pawlowski, M. Tissier, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rept. 910, 1 (2021), arXiv:2006.04853 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    Bonanno and M

    A. Bonanno and M. Reuter, JHEP02, 035 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0410191

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  68. [68]

    Bonanno, G

    A. Bonanno, G. Oglialoro, and D. Zappal` a, Phys. Rev. D112, 026002 (2025), arXiv:2504.07877 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    A. M. Bonanno, E. M. Glaviano, and G. P. Vacca, Eur. Phys. J. C86, 450 (2026), arXiv:2508.00807 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  70. [70]

    A. M. Bonanno, R. A. Konoplya, G. Oglialoro, and A. Spina, JCAP12, 042 (2025), arXiv:2509.12469 [gr- qc]

    arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Giacometti, K

    G. Giacometti, K. Kowalska, D. Rizzo, E. M. Sessolo, and D. Zappala, (2026), arXiv:2604.03033 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  72. [72]

    E. M. Glaviano, (2026), arXiv:2605.29159 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  73. [73]

    S. P. de Alwis, JHEP03, 118 (2018), arXiv:1707.09298 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    K. G. Wilson and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. Lett.28, 240 (1972)

    1972

  75. [75]

    Gies, Phys

    H. Gies, Phys. Rev. D68, 085015 (2003), arXiv:hep- th/0305208

    arXiv 2003

  76. [76]

    T. R. Morris, JHEP01, 002 (2005), arXiv:hep- ph/0410142

    arXiv 2005

  77. [77]

    Gawedzki and A

    K. Gawedzki and A. Kupiainen, Phys. Rev. Lett.55, 363 (1985)

    1985

  78. [78]

    Braun, H

    J. Braun, H. Gies, and D. D. Scherer, Phys. Rev. D83, 085012 (2011), arXiv:1011.1456 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  79. [79]

    Jack and D

    I. Jack and D. R. T. Jones, Nucl. Phys. B358, 695 (1991)

    1991

  80. [80]

    Kawai and M

    H. Kawai and M. Ninomiya, Nucl. Phys. B336, 115 (1990)

    1990

Showing first 80 references.