Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

CELLO: Causal Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.19131 v1 pith:JHRXPFJO submitted 2024-06-27 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords causalcausalitycelloreasoningcommonsensedatasetdefinitiongraphs
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Causal reasoning is fundamental to human intelligence and crucial for effective decision-making in real-world environments. Despite recent advancements in large vision-language models (LVLMs), their ability to comprehend causality remains unclear. Previous work typically focuses on commonsense causality between events and/or actions, which is insufficient for applications like embodied agents and lacks the explicitly defined causal graphs required for formal causal reasoning. To overcome these limitations, we introduce a fine-grained and unified definition of causality involving interactions between humans and/or objects. Building on the definition, we construct a novel dataset, CELLO, consisting of 14,094 causal questions across all four levels of causality: discovery, association, intervention, and counterfactual. This dataset surpasses traditional commonsense causality by including explicit causal graphs that detail the interactions between humans and objects. Extensive experiments on CELLO reveal that current LVLMs still struggle with causal reasoning tasks, but they can benefit significantly from our proposed CELLO-CoT, a causally inspired chain-of-thought prompting strategy. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses from this study provide valuable insights for future research. Our project page is at https://github.com/OpenCausaLab/CELLO.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Discovering and using Spelke segments

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SpelkeNet, a self-supervised video world model, discovers Spelke segments in static images by aggregating motion correlations across imagined pokes.

  2. Distilling Counterfactual Reasoning from Language to Vision: Causal Graph Guided Post-Training for Video Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-11 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A new video benchmark and post-training recipe claim to improve VLMs' counterfactual 'what if' reasoning, but the reported gains likely come from training on the test set.

  3. CF-VLM:CounterFactual Vision-Language Fine-tuning

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CF-VLM fine-tunes VLMs on counterfactual image-text pairs with three objectives, reporting gains on compositional reasoning benchmarks and modest hallucination reductions.

Pith tools