Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Understanding Multimodal LLMs: the Mechanistic Interpretability of Llava in Visual Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.10950 v2 pith:JI4JF7MP submitted 2024-11-17 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords visualinterpretabilitymechanismsansweringllavallmsmodelstextual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Understanding the mechanisms behind Large Language Models (LLMs) is crucial for designing improved models and strategies. While recent studies have yielded valuable insights into the mechanisms of textual LLMs, the mechanisms of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) remain underexplored. In this paper, we apply mechanistic interpretability methods to analyze the visual question answering (VQA) mechanisms in the first MLLM, Llava. We compare the mechanisms between VQA and textual QA (TQA) in color answering tasks and find that: a) VQA exhibits a mechanism similar to the in-context learning mechanism observed in TQA; b) the visual features exhibit significant interpretability when projecting the visual embeddings into the embedding space; and c) Llava enhances the existing capabilities of the corresponding textual LLM Vicuna during visual instruction tuning. Based on these findings, we develop an interpretability tool to help users and researchers identify important visual locations for final predictions, aiding in the understanding of visual hallucination. Our method demonstrates faster and more effective results compared to existing interpretability approaches. Code: \url{https://github.com/zepingyu0512/llava-mechanism}

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Do VLMs Fail? Vision-Operation Misalignment in Compositional VQA

    cs.CV 2026-07 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper proposes four operation-level VLM failure modes and a pathway dissociation, but the dissociation is not supported by the paper's own intervention statistics.

Pith tools