Demonstration of Efficient Predictive Surrogates for Large-scale Quantum Processors

Bo Du; Dacheng Tao; He-Liang Huang; Tian-Ci Tian; Wei-You Liao; Xinbiao Wang; Yong Luo; Yuxuan Du

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Demonstration of Efficient Predictive Surrogates for Large-scale Quantum Processors

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that two classical learning models trained on limited noisy-processor data can provably emulate a quantum processor's expectation values, and demonstrates the method by pre-training VQEs on 20 qubits and mapping Floquet…

desk verdict A real noisy-setting extension of the noiseless surrogate program with substantial hardware experiments, but the hqs demonstration runs outside its own theorem's hypotheses and the printed bounds have log-sign typos; worth refereeing, not desk-rejecting. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.17470 v1 pith:JJFRSCN3 submitted 2025-07-23 quant-ph cs.AIcs.LG

Wei-You Liao , Yuxuan Du , Xinbiao Wang , Tian-Ci Tian , Yong Luo , Bo Du , Dacheng Tao , He-Liang Huang This is my paper

classification quant-phcs.AIcs.LG MSC 81P68 PACS 03.67.Lx

keywords predictivesurrogateclassicalshadowvariationalquantumeigensolverPaulinoisetrigonometricexpansionFloquetphasesamplecomplexitysuperconductingqubits

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a classical learner can emulate a specific noisy quantum processor's expectation values $\mathrm{Tr}(\tilde{\rho}(x)O)$ for parameters $x$ it has never been shown, with provable sample efficiency. It answers yes with two surrogates: $h_{\mathrm{cs}}$, a classical-shadow kernel predictor for circuits with independently tunable rotation gates, and $h_{\mathrm{qs}}$, a ridge-regression surrogate for circuits whose parameters are repeated across layers. The theoretical result is that an $\epsilon$-accurate surrogate can be trained from $n$ examples, where $n$ is polynomial when the gradient norm of the learned function is small or Pauli noise is substantial. On a 20-qubit superconducting processor the authors use these surrogates to pre-train variational quantum eigensolvers and to identify Floquet phases, reducing measurement volume by orders of magnitude—for VQE, to 0.023% of the conventional cost.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the truncated trigonometric monomial expansion of the noisy expectation value. Writing the circuit as $U(x)=\prod_{l=1}^{d}(R_Z(x_l)V_l)$ with Clifford $V_l$, every $\mathrm{Tr}(\tilde{\rho}(x)O)$ expands as $\sum_\omega \tilde{\alpha}_\omega \Phi_\omega(x)$ with monomials $\Phi_\omega$; under the Pauli channel the coefficients obey $|\tilde{\alpha}_\omega|\le(1-2(p+p_Z))^{\|\omega\|_0}|\alpha_\omega|$, which together with a small gradient norm $C$ justifies keeping only frequencies $\|\omega\|_0\le\Lambda$. The learner realizes the truncation either as the kernel $\kappa_\Lambda(x,x')=\sum_{\omega:\|\omega\|_0\le\Lambda}2^{\|\omega\|_0}\Phi_\omega(x)\Phi_\omega(x')$ over classical shadows (for $h_{\mathrm{cs}}$) or as ridge regression on the explicit feature vector $[\Phi_\omega(x)]_{\omega\in C(\Lambda)}$ (for $h_{\mathrm{qs}}$). This machinery is what converts quantum data acquisition into a one-time training cost, because inference after training is pure linear algebra on classical data.

What would settle it

Estimate $C=\mathbb{E}_{x\sim\mathrm{Unif}[-\pi,\pi]^d}\|\nabla_x\mathrm{Tr}(\tilde{\rho}(x)H_{\mathrm{TFIM}})\|_2^2$ for the 20-qubit ansatz used in Section III (and $q=1-2(p+p_Z)$, $R$ for the Floquet circuits); if $C$ grows with $N$ or $q(1+R)\ge1/e$, the polynomial sample-complexity claims of Theorems 1 and 2 do not cover the demonstrated experiments, and the training-set sizes in the figures would be unaccounted for.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that noisy expectation values of an $R_Z$+Clifford circuit have a trigonometric expansion whose coefficients contract under Pauli noise, so a truncated version of that expansion is a good and classically learnable model. Formally, $h_{\mathrm{cs}}$ predicts $\mathrm{Tr}(O\tilde{\rho}(x))$ with average error $R(h_{\mathrm{cs}})\le\epsilon$ using $n=\tilde{O}((C/\min\{4C/\epsilon,1/(2(p+p_Z))\})2B^2 9^K/\epsilon)$ training examples when the input is uniform, the observable is $K$-local with norm bound $B$, and $\mathbb{E}_x\|\nabla_x\mathrm{Tr}(\tilde{\rho}(x)O)\|_2^2\le C$; even $T=1$ shadow snapshot per example suffices. For correlated parameters sampled from an arbitrary distribution on $[-R,R]^d$, $h_{\mathrm{qs}}$ achieves the same guarantee under the conditions $q(1+R)<1/e$ and $\Lambda>d e q(1+R)$, with $n=(1/(q(1+R)))^{4\Lambda}\log(1/\delta)/9$. The experiments on up to 20 qubits show $h_{\mathrm{cs}}$ pre-trained VQEs reach normalized deviation $\approx0.09$ versus $0.21$ for the direct VQE while using 0.023% of the measurements, and $h_{\mathrm{qs}}$ reproduces the FSPT-to-thermal transition signature with a predicted transition region near $\delta\approx0.2$.

Load-bearing premise

The entire efficiency claim rests on the unverified premise that the noisy expectation values being learned change slowly as the circuit parameters vary (a small gradient bound $C$), or that Pauli noise is strong enough to suppress high-frequency trigonometric terms; if neither holds, the promised polynomial sample complexity is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

A variational eigensolver can be pre-trained entirely classically: minimizing the surrogate rather than the processor output reaches normalized deviation about 0.09 in the paper's runs, and further fine-tuning on the quantum processor only improves it to about 0.07.
Measurement-heavy characterizations such as Floquet phase diagrams can be done mostly by surrogate inference; the paper reports 250 training evolutions per $h_{\mathrm{qs}}$ replacing what would have been 500,000 direct evolutions for the same sweep.
The bounds predict that Pauli noise helps rather than hurts $h_{\mathrm{cs}}$, and the gate-folding experiments confirm the trend: mean squared error drops from 0.0147 at folding factor 1 to 0.0028 at factor 16.
Because the training data are classical shadows of the actual noisy processor, the surrogate inherits the device's noise characteristics without requiring an explicit noise model, unlike tensor-network or Pauli-path simulators.
The trigonometric machinery extends by Clifford conjugation to circuits with arbitrary Pauli rotations and Clifford gates, and a separate small-range result (Theorem 3) handles the low-noise regime for correlated parameters.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the small-gradient condition $C$ is as favorable for deeper circuits as the paper's motivating barren-plateau argument suggests, the practical resource model for near-term algorithms shifts from repeated processor access to a bounded training cost plus free classical search over parameters.
A direct, paper-level test of the theorem conditions is missing: reporting empirical values of $C$ for the 20-qubit TFIM ansatz and $q(1+R)$ for the Floquet circuits would determine whether the polynomial guarantees cover exactly the systems demonstrated.
The surrogate formalism targets expectation values; applying the same contraction idea to output distributions, sample generation, or nonlinear properties such as entropy would require new machinery, since the trigonometric-coefficient argument does not directly control those quantities.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know before you read it. The paper genuinely extends the noiseless predictive-surrogate framework of Ref. [39] to Pauli-noise channels, and it ships real hardware experiments on up to 20 qubits. But the hqs experiment that anchors the second surrogate is run outside the hypotheses of Theorem 2, and the formal statements of Theorem 1 contain log-argument typos that make the displayed sample-complexity condition impossible for small epsilon. Both are fixable, and neither kills the core idea.

What is actually new: the noisy learnability theorem for hcs and the hqs model for correlated parameters with arbitrary input distributions. Most of the proof infrastructure is adapted from Refs. [52] and [39], but the noisy guarantees and the correlated-parameter analysis are not in the cited prior work, so the contribution is real. The experiments are also substantial: VQE pretraining across TFIM families on up to 20 qubits, FSPT phase identification on 8 qubits, plus device characterization and noisy numerical simulations in the SM. The VQE measurement reduction is impressive and the surrogate-vs-processor agreement is decent. I think the central claim—that classical surrogates trained on a modest number of noisy executions can cut measurement costs for parameter families—is plausible and worth taking seriously.

Now the soft spots, in proportion. The biggest one is the hqs demonstration. Theorem 2 requires q(1+R) < 1/e. With median CZ error around 1.7% and R=2 from the δ range [0,2], q(1+R) lands near 2.9, an order of magnitude above 0.367. The theorem also needs Λ > d e q(1+R), roughly 64, while the experiment uses Λ=7 with a random 1000-feature subset. So the FSPT experiment is a heuristic demonstration outside the proven region. That does not invalidate the theorem, but the paper should say so; right now it implies the experiment validates the provable-efficiency claim. Second, the printed Theorem 1 statements contain log(2B√epsilon) or log(2√epsilon) where the derivation requires log(2B/√epsilon). For small epsilon those arguments are negative, so the bounds are literally meaningless. A referee should insist on corrected statements. Third, the hcs experiments use ridge regression over truncated features rather than the kernel estimator analyzed in Eq. (5); the gap is probably bridgeable but should be acknowledged. The FSPT measurement accounting also leaves out the cost of quantum validation when claiming the 2000x reduction.

Who is this for? People working on classical surrogates for parameterized quantum circuits, VQE pretraining, and noisy simulation. It deserves a serious peer review—send it out—but with requests for corrected theorem statements, an explicit statement that the FSPT experiment is outside Theorem 2's hypotheses, and a clearer link between the analyzed estimator and the implemented one.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces two classical predictive surrogates, hcs and hqs, designed to emulate the mean-value behavior of noisy parameterized quantum circuits. hcs is a classical-shadow predictor for independently tunable parameters, with a sample-complexity bound governed by the gradient-norm constant C and by Pauli noise; hqs is a ridge-regression surrogate for correlated parameters sampled from arbitrary distributions, with a bound under a strong-Pauli-noise condition. The paper reports experiments on up to 20 superconducting qubits: hcs is used to pre-train VQEs for transverse-field Ising models, and hqs is used to identify Floquet symmetry-protected topological (FSPT) phases. The central claim is that these surrogates reduce quantum measurement overhead by orders of magnitude while retaining provable computational efficiency.

Significance. If the theorems are correct and the experiments satisfy their hypotheses, the paper makes a substantial contribution: it extends the noiseless trigonometric-expansion surrogate of Ref. [39] to noisy circuits, analyzes correlated-parameter circuits, and supports the theory with an unusually detailed experimental study, including device characterization, training dynamics, noisy numerical simulations, and measurement-accounting analyses. The reliance on the authors' own Ref. [39] for noiseless lemmas is a legitimate extension rather than circular reasoning. However, the significance is currently provisional: the headline hqs experiment does not satisfy the hypotheses of Theorem 2, the hcs experiment does not estimate the crucial constant C, and the printed theorem statements contain sign errors in logarithmic arguments. These issues prevent the paper from fully supporting its 'provably efficient' claims.

major comments (5)

[Section II.B and SM B, Eq. (B3), (B10), (B12)] The printed sample-complexity formulas contain logarithms with nonpositive arguments in the regime they are intended to cover. The informal Theorem 1 in the main text uses log(2B√ε), and the formal statement in SM B uses log(2√ε); both are negative for sufficiently small ε, e.g., ε < 1/(4B²) in the former case. The derivation in SM B clearly requires log(2B/√ε), as the threshold condition should be Λ ≥ min{4C/ε, (1/(2(p+pZ))) log(2B/√ε)}. Please correct every instance and re-check the displayed formula and the surrounding conditions so that the theorem is meaningful for the stated 0<ε<1 regime.
[Section III (FSPT experiment) and SM G.1, SM G.3b] The hqs experiment does not satisfy the hypotheses of Theorem 2. With the device gate errors reported in SM G.1 (median single-qubit error 0.17%, median CZ error 1.71%), even taking p+pZ ≤ 0.02 gives q = 1 − 2(p+pZ) ≥ 0.96. Since the inputs are δ ∈ [0,2] and J_i ∈ [0,1], the range bound is R = 2, so q(1+R) ≈ 2.9, which is far above the theorem's requirement q(1+R) < 1/e ≈ 0.37. Consequently the required truncation threshold Λ > d e q(1+R) ≈ 64 for d = 8 is not met by the Λ = 7 used in SM G.3b. The FSPT demonstration is therefore a heuristic validation outside the proven region, not a demonstration of Theorem 2's efficiency guarantee, and the text should say so explicitly.
[SM G.3b and SM C.2] The implemented hqs uses a randomly sampled 1000-feature subset Φ_{Ω(Λ)} of the truncated feature set Φ_{C(Λ)}, whereas Theorem 2 and its proof in SM C analyze the full truncated feature map Φ_{C(Λ)} and the kernel K(x,x') = ⟨Φ_{C(Λ)}(x), Φ_{C(Λ)}(x')⟩. Random feature approximation introduces an additional approximation/estimation error that is not covered by the theorem's bounds. The experiment therefore cannot be cited as a validation of the provable efficiency of hqs as stated; either the theory must be extended to random feature maps, or the experimental section should be framed as a heuristic study of a related model.
[Section III and SM G.2] For the hcs experiment, the central condition of Theorem 1, namely the gradient-norm bound E_x ||∇_x Tr(˜ρ(x)O)||²₂ ≤ C with Λ = 4C/ε, is never checked. The experiments fix Λ = 2 and vary n, but no estimate or upper bound for C is provided for the TFIM circuits, nor are the Pauli-noise parameters p and pZ estimated from the device data. Without such estimates, the observed performance of hcs cannot be attributed to the theorem's polynomial sample-complexity regime; this should be stated, or C and the noise parameters should be bounded for the circuits used.
[SM C.3, Eq. (C8), (C17), (C20)] The proof of Theorem 2 has a gap in the application of the ridge-regression generalization bound. Lemma 6 concerns the hypothesis class H = {h(x)=⟨Φ(x),w⟩ : ||w||₂ ≤ λ}, but the surrogate hqs is defined by the unconstrained minimization in Eq. (C8). The proof bounds ||α~_{C(Λ)}||₂ in Eq. (C17) and uses this as λ, but it does not show that the solution ŵ of Eq. (C8) satisfies ||ŵ||₂ ≤ λ. The bound on |h(x)−y| in Eq. (C20) is valid only for hypotheses in that norm ball. Please either solve the norm-constrained problem or supply a separate bound on the norm of the ridge-regression solution.

minor comments (5)

[SM D, Theorem 3 and Eq. (D12)-(D13)] The statement of Theorem 3 gives n = (1/(eqR))^{4Λ} log(1/δ)/9, but the proof first derives n ≥ (1/(qR))^{4Λ} log(1/δ)/9 and then restates the bound with an extra factor e in the base; please reconcile the missing factor and ensure all displayed exponents are consistent.
[SM D, Eq. (D8)] In the bound for |h(x)−y|, the notation ||Φ_{C(Λ)}|| appears where the feature map for the small-range construction Φ_{S(Λ)} is intended; this makes the derivation difficult to follow.
[Section II.A and Section III] The symbol R is used for three different objects: the input range in Theorem 2, the prediction risk R(h) in Eq. (3), and the normalized deviation R(x) in the VQE experiments. Please introduce distinct notations to avoid confusion.
[SM G.3c, Table II] Table II spans nearly two pages with 79×8 entries; a heatmap or a representative subset with the full data in a repository would be much easier for readers to interpret.
[SM C, Lemma 9] The statement of Lemma 9 omits the factor B that appears in its proof and in Eq. (C16); since |α_ω| ≤ B is used, the displayed worst-case truncation bound should include B.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the noisy-sample-complexity theorems are new conditional results with stated assumptions, and the experimental claims are benchmarked against quantum processor outputs and the external FSPT reference; only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation to Ref. [39] appears.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are conditional theorems, not fits renamed as predictions. Theorem 1 (Sec. II.B; formal statement and proof in SM B) assumes E_x||∇_x Tr(ρ~(x)O)||_2^2 ≤ C and a Pauli noise model, and delivers a sample-complexity bound for the truncated trigonometric kernel predictor; the proof uses truncation and estimation lemmas, including Lemma 4 adapted from the authors' Ref. [39], but the adaptation is justified from the identical Fourier structure of noisy and noiseless coefficients, and the estimation bound is re-derived for noisy classical shadows. This is a legitimate extension rather than a circular self-citation chain, because the noisy truncation bound also combines an external result (Lemma 5, from Ref. [52]) and the final theorem's assumptions do not include the target error bound. Theorem 2 (Sec. II.C and SM C) is similarly a conditional ridge-regression generalization bound under q(1+R)<1/e; its sample-complexity expression follows from binomial inequalities and the external statistical learning bound of Ref. [138], not from fitting the experimental outcomes. The experimental sections validate hcs against quantum processor outputs and compare the hqs phase identification to the external criterion of Ref. [44], so the demonstrations are not constructed to reproduce the theory by definition. The FSPT experiment uses Λ=7, n=250, and device noise implies q(1+R)≈3, which violates Theorem 2's q(1+R)<1/e hypothesis; this is a real correctness and applicability gap that should be handled in the correctness-risk assessment, but it is not circularity because the theorem is explicitly conditional and the surrogate's success in that regime is presented as empirical rather than as a consequence of the theorem. The only self-citation is to Ref. [39] for noiseless truncation and estimation lemmas and for the empirical claim that the gradient-norm constant C tends to decrease with qubit number and depth; that citation is minor and not load-bearing for the noisy guarantees, which are proved in the Supplementary Material under stated assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central efficiency claim is bought with the Pauli-noise ansatz, the unverified small-gradient bound C (Theorem 1) or the strong-noise condition q(1+R)<1/e (Theorem 2), and hand-picked hyperparameters Lambda, lambda, T, n, |Omega|. The experiments tune these values rather than deriving them from the theorems.

free parameters (5)

Truncation threshold Lambda = Lambda=2 for hcs; Lambda=7 with |Omega|=1000 for hqs
Theory prescribes Lambda=4C/epsilon, but C is not measured. The experiments show Lambda=1 gives R>0.42 while Lambda=2 gives R<0.09, so the value is chosen empirically.
Regularization parameter lambda = 1
Set to 1 in the ridge regressions for both surrogates; no derivation from the theorems.
Number of snapshots/shots per training example T = T=10 hcs (up to 100 for 20 qubits); T=40000 hqs
Chosen to control shadow estimation error; the paper states larger T is needed as qubit count grows, but values are set by hand.
Training set size n = n=2000 for main hcs result; n=250 per hqs
Chosen for experimental accuracy; the theorems give scaling rates but not the constants, and n is picked in the ranges 400-2000 (hcs) and 250 (hqs).
Number of random features |Omega(Lambda)| for hqs = 1000
The surrogate randomly samples 1000 trigonometric features from C(Lambda) (SM G.3.b) to balance cost and error; this is a hand-set hyperparameter.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The noise on the quantum processor is well-modeled by Pauli channels obtained by twirling, so each RZ gate is followed by a Pauli channel NP and each Clifford block by a Pauli channel M (Eq. (1)).
This is the basis for Lemma 1's coefficient decay. Real devices have amplitude damping, leakage, and crosstalk; the paper does not validate the Pauli model against tomographic data.
domain assumption The gradient-norm bound E_x||grad_x Tr(rho~(x)O)||^2_2 <= C holds with a small C for the circuits considered.
Theorem 1 sets Lambda=4C/epsilon and its sample complexity grows with C. C is not measured for the 6-20 qubit TFIM ansatz.
domain assumption For hqs, the noise and parameter range satisfy q(1+R) < 1/e, i.e., sufficiently strong Pauli noise or small range; also the label error satisfies epsilon_l <= sqrt(epsilon)/4.
These are conditions in Theorem 2; the paper does not report q or epsilon_l for the FSPT experiment.
standard math The trigonometric expansion of the noisy expectation value and the coefficient decay bound (Lemma 1, adapted from Ref. [52]) are valid.
Textbook Fourier analysis of Clifford+RZ circuits, accepted as background.
standard math The classical shadow has bounded estimator with |Tr(O rho_T(x))| <= 3KB (Eq. (B15)).
Standard classical shadow concentration, used in Lemma 3.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Demonstration of Efficient Predictive Surrogates for Large-scale Quantum Processors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JJFRSCN3

@misc{pith2026250717470,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Demonstration of Efficient Predictive Surrogates for Large-scale Quantum Processors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JJFRSCN3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.17470}
}

read the original abstract

The ongoing development of quantum processors is driving breakthroughs in scientific discovery. Despite this progress, the formidable cost of fabricating large-scale quantum processors means they will remain rare for the foreseeable future, limiting their widespread application. To address this bottleneck, we introduce the concept of predictive surrogates, which are classical learning models designed to emulate the mean-value behavior of a given quantum processor with provably computational efficiency. In particular, we propose two predictive surrogates that can substantially reduce the need for quantum processor access in diverse practical scenarios. To demonstrate their potential in advancing digital quantum simulation, we use these surrogates to emulate a quantum processor with up to 20 programmable superconducting qubits, enabling efficient pre-training of variational quantum eigensolvers for families of transverse-field Ising models and identification of non-equilibrium Floquet symmetry-protected topological phases. Experimental results reveal that the predictive surrogates not only reduce measurement overhead by orders of magnitude, but can also surpass the performance of conventional, quantum-resource-intensive approaches. Collectively, these findings establish predictive surrogates as a practical pathway to broadening the impact of advanced quantum processors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.17470 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Learning to Reconstruct Wigner Functions in Phase Space
quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Two machine learning models reconstruct continuous Wigner functions from sparse phase-space measurements: a provably efficient regression model for sparse states (O(s⁴ log d) samples) and a self-supervised neural netw...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

158 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[39]

Du , author M.-H

author author Y. Du , author M.-H. \ Hsieh ,\ and\ author D. Tao ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59198-z journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 3790 ( year 2025 a ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59198-z 2025
[52]

Fontana , author M

author author E. Fontana , author M. S. \ Rudolph , author R. Duncan , author I. Rungger ,\ and\ author C. C \^i rstoiu ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00955-1 journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 11 ,\ pages 84 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00955-1
[1]

Bluvstein , author S

author author D. Bluvstein , author S. J. \ Evered , author A. A. \ Geim , author S. H. \ Li , author H. Zhou , author T. Manovitz , author S. Ebadi , author M. Cain , author M. Kalinowski , author D. Hangleiter , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06927-3 journal journal Nature \ volume 626 ,\ pages 58 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06927-3
[2]

author author G. Q. \ AI \ and\ author Collaborators ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y journal journal Nature \ volume 638 ,\ pages 920 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y 2025
[3]

Gao , author D

author author D. Gao , author D. Fan , author C. Zha , author J. Bei , author G. Cai , author J. Cai , author S. Cao , author X. Zeng , author F. Chen , author J. Chen , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.090601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 134 ,\ pages 090601 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.090601
[4]

Arute , author K

author author F. Arute , author K. Arya , author R. Babbush , author D. Bacon , author J. C. \ Bardin , author R. Barends , author R. Biswas , author S. Boixo , author F. G. \ Brandao , author D. A. \ Buell , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 journal journal Nature \ volume 574 ,\ pages 505 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5
[5]

\ Zhong , author H

author author H.-S. \ Zhong , author H. Wang , author Y.-H. \ Deng , author M.-C. \ Chen , author L.-C. \ Peng , author Y.-H. \ Luo , author J. Qin , author D. Wu , author X. Ding , author Y. Hu , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe8770 journal journal Science \ volume 370 ,\ pages 1460 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

doi:10.1126/science.abe8770
[6]

Wu , author W.-S

author author Y. Wu , author W.-S. \ Bao , author S. Cao , author F. Chen , author M.-C. \ Chen , author X. Chen , author T.-H. \ Chung , author H. Deng , author Y. Du , author D. Fan , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.180501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 127 ,\ pages 180501 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.180501

Show all 158 references

[7]

Villalonga , author X

author author B. Villalonga , author X. Mi , author S. Mandra , author A. Bengtsson , author P. Klimov , author Z. Chen , author S. Hong , author C. Erickson , author I. Drozdov , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07998-6 journal journal Nature \ volume 634 ,\ pages...

doi
[8]

author author M. H. \ Abobeih , author Y. Wang , author J. Randall , author S. Loenen , author C. E. \ Bradley , author M. Markham , author D. J. \ Twitchen , author B. M. \ Terhal ,\ and\ author T. H. \ Taminiau ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04819-6 journal journal Na...

doi
[9]

Krinner , author N

author author S. Krinner , author N. Lacroix , author A. Remm , author A. Di Paolo , author E. Genois , author C. Leroux , author C. Hellings , author S. Lazar , author F. Swiadek , author J. Herrmann , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04566-8 journal journal Natur...

doi
[10]

author author V. V. \ Sivak , author A. Eickbusch , author B. Royer , author S. Singh , author I. Tsioutsios , author S. Ganjam , author A. Miano , author B. Brock , author A. Ding , author L. Frunzio , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05782-6 journal journal Natur...

doi
[11]

author author G. Q. \ AI \ and\ author Collaborators ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05434-1 journal journal Nature \ volume 614 ,\ pages 676 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023 doi
[12]

Bausch , author A

author author J. Bausch , author A. W. \ Senior , author F. J. \ Heras , author T. Edlich , author A. Davies , author M. Newman , author C. Jones , author K. Satzinger , author M. Y. \ Niu , author S. Blackwell , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-081...

doi
[13]

Mi , author P

author author X. Mi , author P. Roushan , author C. Quintana , author S. Mandra , author J. Marshall , author C. Neill , author F. Arute , author K. Arya , author J. Atalaya , author R. Babbush , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg5029 journal journal Science \ volum...

doi
[14]

Mi , author M

author author X. Mi , author M. Ippoliti , author C. Quintana , author A. Greene , author Z. Chen , author J. Gross , author F. Arute , author K. Arya , author J. Atalaya , author R. Babbush , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04257-w journal journal Nature \ volume...

doi
[15]

Semeghini , author H

author author G. Semeghini , author H. Levine , author A. Keesling , author S. Ebadi , author T. T. \ Wang , author D. Bluvstein , author R. Verresen , author H. Pichler , author M. Kalinowski , author R. Samajdar , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abi8794 journal jou...

doi
[16]

author author T. I. \ Andersen , author N. Astrakhantsev , author A. H. \ Karamlou , author J. Berndtsson , author J. Motruk , author A. Szasz , author J. A. \ Gross , author A. Schuckert , author T. Westerhout , author Y. Zhang , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-0...

doi
[17]

Cao , author B

author author S. Cao , author B. Wu , author F. Chen , author M. Gong , author Y. Wu , author Y. Ye , author C. Zha , author H. Qian , author C. Ying , author S. Guo , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06195-1 journal journal Nature \ volume 619 ,\ pages 738 ( year ...

doi
[18]

author author T. E. \ O’Brien , author G. Anselmetti , author F. Gkritsis , author V. Elfving , author S. Polla , author W. J. \ Huggins , author O. Oumarou , author K. Kechedzhi , author D. Abanin , author R. Acharya , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-...

doi
[19]

Guo , author J

author author S. Guo , author J. Sun , author H. Qian , author M. Gong , author Y. Zhang , author F. Chen , author Y. Ye , author Y. Wu , author S. Cao , author K. Liu , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-024-02530-z journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 20 ,\ pages 1240 (...

doi
[20]

Eisert , author D

author author J. Eisert , author D. Hangleiter , author N. Walk , author I. Roth , author D. Markham , author R. Parekh , author U. Chabaud ,\ and\ author E. Kashefi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-0186-4 journal journal Nat. Rev. Phys. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 382 ( year 202...

doi
[21]

Biamonte , author P

author author J. Biamonte , author P. Wittek , author N. Pancotti , author P. Rebentrost , author N. Wiebe ,\ and\ author S. Lloyd ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23474 journal journal Nature \ volume 549 ,\ pages 195 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

doi
[22]

Abbas , author A

author author A. Abbas , author A. Ambainis , author B. Augustino , author A. B \"a rtschi , author H. Buhrman , author C. Coffrin , author G. Cortiana , author V. Dunjko , author D. J. \ Egger , author B. G. \ Elmegreen , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s422...

doi
[23]

author author I. L. \ Markov \ and\ author Y. Shi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1137/050644756 journal journal SIAM J. Comput. \ volume 38 ,\ pages 963 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

2008 doi
[24]

Villalonga , author S

author author B. Villalonga , author S. Boixo , author B. Nelson , author C. Henze , author E. Rieffel , author R. Biswas ,\ and\ author S. Mandr \`a ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0196-1 journal journal npj Quantum Inf. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 86 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

doi
[25]

author author J. I. \ Cirac , author D. Perez-Garcia , author N. Schuch ,\ and\ author F. Verstraete ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.045003 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 93 ,\ pages 045003 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021 doi
[26]

Pan \ and\ author P

author author F. Pan \ and\ author P. Zhang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.030501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 128 ,\ pages 030501 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022 doi
[27]

Bravyi \ and\ author D

author author S. Bravyi \ and\ author D. Gosset ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.250501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 250501 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

2016 doi
[28]

Bravyi , author D

author author S. Bravyi , author D. Browne , author P. Calpin , author E. Campbell , author D. Gosset ,\ and\ author M. Howard ,\ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-09-02-181 journal journal Quantum \ volume 3 ,\ pages 181 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

2019 doi
[29]

Begu s i \'c , author J

author author T. Begu s i \'c , author J. Gray ,\ and\ author G. K.-L. \ Chan ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.adk4321 journal journal Sci. Adv. \ volume 10 ,\ pages eadk4321 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi
[30]

author author M. S. \ Rudolph , author E. Fontana , author Z. Holmes ,\ and\ author L. Cincio ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.09109 journal journal arXiv:2308.09109 \ ( year 2023 a ) NoStop

2023 doi arXiv
[31]

Bermejo , author P

author author P. Bermejo , author P. Braccia , author M. S. \ Rudolph , author Z. Holmes , author L. Cincio ,\ and\ author M. Cerezo ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.12739 journal journal arXiv:2408.12739 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi arXiv
[32]

Angrisani , author A

author author A. Angrisani , author A. Schmidhuber , author M. S. \ Rudolph , author M. Cerezo , author Z. Holmes ,\ and\ author H.-Y. \ Huang ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.01706 journal journal arXiv:2409.01706 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

doi
[33]

Angrisani , author A

author author A. Angrisani , author A. A. \ Mele , author M. S. \ Rudolph , author M. Cerezo ,\ and\ author Z. Holmes ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.13101 journal journal arXiv:2501.13101 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025 doi arXiv
[34]

\ Wu , author Y

author author Y.-D. \ Wu , author Y. Zhu , author G. Bai , author Y. Wang ,\ and\ author G. Chiribella ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.210601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 130 ,\ pages 210601 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

doi
[35]

Qin , author L

author author H. Qin , author L. Che , author C. Wei , author F. Xu , author Y. Huang ,\ and\ author T. Xin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.190801 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 132 ,\ pages 190801 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

doi
[36]

Qian , author Y

author author Y. Qian , author Y. Du , author Z. He , author M.-H. \ Hsieh ,\ and\ author D. Tao ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.130601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 130601 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi
[37]

Zhao , author C

author author Y. Zhao , author C. Zhang ,\ and\ author Y. Du ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.13852 journal journal arXiv:2505.13852 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025 doi arXiv
[38]

Fauseweh ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46402-9 journal journal Nat

author author B. Fauseweh ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46402-9 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 2123 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi
[40]

Elben , author S

author author A. Elben , author S. T. \ Flammia , author H.-Y. \ Huang , author R. Kueng , author J. Preskill , author B. Vermersch ,\ and\ author P. Zoller ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00535-2 journal journal Nat. Rev. Phys. \ ,\ pages 1 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

doi
[41]

author author B. M. \ Terhal ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.307 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 307 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015 doi
[42]

Tilly , author H

author author J. Tilly , author H. Chen , author S. Cao , author D. Picozzi , author K. Setia , author Y. Li , author E. Grant , author L. Wossnig , author I. Rungger , author G. H. \ Booth , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 journal journal Phys. Rep. \ ...

doi
[43]

Khemani , author A

author author V. Khemani , author A. Lazarides , author R. Moessner ,\ and\ author S. L. \ Sondhi ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.250401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 250401 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

doi
[44]

Zhang , author W

author author X. Zhang , author W. Jiang , author J. Deng , author K. Wang , author J. Chen , author P. Zhang , author W. Ren , author H. Dong , author S. Xu , author Y. Gao , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04854-3 journal journal Nature \ volume 607 ,\ pages 468...

doi
[45]

author author N. J. \ Ross \ and\ author P. Selinger ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1403.2975 journal journal arXiv:1403.2975 \ ( year 2014 ) NoStop

2014 doi arXiv
[46]

author author C. H. \ Bennett , author D. P. \ DiVincenzo , author J. A. \ Smolin ,\ and\ author W. K. \ Wootters ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.54.3824 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 54 ,\ pages 3824 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

1996 doi
[47]

Chen , author C

author author S. Chen , author C. Oh , author S. Zhou , author H.-Y. \ Huang ,\ and\ author L. Jiang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.180805 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 132 ,\ pages 180805 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi
[48]

Vapnik ,\ @noop title The nature of statistical learning theory \ ( publisher Springer science & business media ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

author author V. Vapnik ,\ @noop title The nature of statistical learning theory \ ( publisher Springer science & business media ,\ year 1999 ) NoStop

1999
[49]

\ Huang , author R

author author H.-Y. \ Huang , author R. Kueng ,\ and\ author J. Preskill ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0932-7 journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 1050 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020 doi
[50]

Larocca , author S

author author M. Larocca , author S. Thanasilp , author S. Wang , author K. Sharma , author J. Biamonte , author P. J. \ Coles , author L. Cincio , author J. R. \ McClean , author Z. Holmes ,\ and\ author M. Cerezo ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-025-00813-9 ...

doi
[51]

Tindall , author M

author author J. Tindall , author M. Fishman , author E. M. \ Stoudenmire ,\ and\ author D. Sels ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.010308 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 5 ,\ pages 010308 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi
[53]

Wang , author E

author author S. Wang , author E. Fontana , author M. Cerezo , author K. Sharma , author A. Sone , author L. Cincio ,\ and\ author P. J. \ Coles ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27045-6 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

doi
[54]

McArdle , author S

author author S. McArdle , author S. Endo , author A. Aspuru-Guzik , author S. C. \ Benjamin ,\ and\ author X. Yuan ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.92.015003 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 92 ,\ pages 015003 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

doi
[55]

Zhang , author M.-H

author author K. Zhang , author M.-H. \ Hsieh , author L. Liu ,\ and\ author D. Tao ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.09376 journal journal arXiv:2203.09376 \ ( year 2022 b ) NoStop

2022 doi arXiv
[56]

Schuld , author V

author author M. Schuld , author V. Bergholm , author C. Gogolin , author J. Izaac ,\ and\ author N. Killoran ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.032331 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 99 ,\ pages 032331 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

doi
[57]

Ponte , author A

author author P. Ponte , author A. Chandran , author Z. Papi \'c ,\ and\ author D. A. \ Abanin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2014.11.008 journal journal Ann. Phys. \ volume 353 ,\ pages 196 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2014 doi
[58]

Cerezo , author A

author author M. Cerezo , author A. Arrasmith , author R. Babbush , author S. C. \ Benjamin , author S. Endo , author K. Fujii , author J. R. \ McClean , author K. Mitarai , author X. Yuan , author L. Cincio , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9 journal journa...

doi
[59]

Du , author X

author author Y. Du , author X. Wang , author N. Guo , author Z. Yu , author Y. Qian , author K. Zhang , author M.-H. \ Hsieh , author P. Rebentrost ,\ and\ author D. Tao ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.01146 journal journal arXiv:2502.01146 \ ( year 2025 b ) NoStop

doi arXiv
[60]

Romero , author R

author author J. Romero , author R. Babbush , author J. R. \ McClean , author C. Hempel , author P. J. \ Love ,\ and\ author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aad3e4 journal journal Quantum Sci. Technol. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 014008 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

doi
[61]

Wang , author J

author author X. Wang , author J. Liu , author T. Liu , author Y. Luo , author Y. Du ,\ and\ author D. Tao ,\ in\ @noop booktitle ICLR \ ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[62]

Weaving , author A

author author T. Weaving , author A. Ralli , author P. J. \ Love , author S. Succi ,\ and\ author P. V. \ Coveney ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00952-4 journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 11 ,\ pages 25 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

doi
[63]

Elben , author B

author author A. Elben , author B. Vermersch , author M. Dalmonte , author J. I. \ Cirac ,\ and\ author P. Zoller ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.050406 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 120 ,\ pages 050406 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

doi
[64]

Lukin , author M

author author A. Lukin , author M. Rispoli , author R. Schittko , author M. E. \ Tai , author A. M. \ Kaufman , author S. Choi , author V. Khemani , author J. L \'e onard ,\ and\ author M. Greiner ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau0818 journal journal Science \ volume 364 ...

doi
[65]

Vermersch , author M

author author B. Vermersch , author M. Ljubotina , author J. I. \ Cirac , author P. Zoller , author M. Serbyn ,\ and\ author L. Piroli ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.14.031035 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 14 ,\ pages 031035 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

doi
[66]

Zhu , author Z.-P

author author D. Zhu , author Z.-P. \ Cian , author C. Noel , author A. Risinger , author D. Biswas , author L. Egan , author Y. Zhu , author A. M. \ Green , author C. H. \ Alderete , author N. H. \ Nguyen , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34279-5 ...

doi
[67]

author author M. K. \ Joshi , author C. Kokail , author R. van Bijnen , author F. Kranzl , author T. V. \ Zache , author R. Blatt , author C. F. \ Roos ,\ and\ author P. Zoller ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06768-0 journal journal Nature \ volume 624 ,\ pages 72 ( year...

doi
[68]

author author A. L. \ Shaw , author Z. Chen , author J. Choi , author D. K. \ Mark , author P. Scholl , author R. Finkelstein , author A. Elben , author S. Choi ,\ and\ author M. Endres ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07173-x journal journal Nature \ volu...

doi
[69]

Wu , author C

author author B. Wu , author C. Xie , author P. Mi , author Z. Wu , author Z. Guo , author P. Huang , author W. Huang , author X. Sun , author J. Zhang , author L. Zhang , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.01657 journal journal arXiv:2506.01657 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

doi arXiv
[70]

author author P. W. \ Shor ,\ https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144598347011 journal journal SIAM Rev. \ volume 41 ,\ pages 303 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

1999 doi
[71]

author author L. K. \ Grover ,\ in\ @noop booktitle STOC \ ( year 1996 )\ pp.\ pages 212--219 NoStop

1996
[72]

Hangleiter \ and\ author J

author author D. Hangleiter \ and\ author J. Eisert ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.95.035001 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 95 ,\ pages 035001 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023 doi
[73]

Zhu , author Y.-D

author author Y. Zhu , author Y.-D. \ Wu , author G. Bai , author D.-S. \ Wang , author Y. Wang ,\ and\ author G. Chiribella ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-33904-7 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 6222 ( year 2022 b ) NoStop

doi
[74]

author author R. G. \ Melko \ and\ author J. Carrasquilla ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-023-00578-0 journal journal Nat. Comput. Sci. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 11 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi
[75]

Wu , author R

author author D. Wu , author R. Rossi , author F. Vicentini , author N. Astrakhantsev , author F. Becca , author X. Cao , author J. Carrasquilla , author F. Ferrari , author A. Georges , author M. Hibat-Allah , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1126/science.adg9774 journal jou...

doi
[76]

Hantzko , author L

author author L. Hantzko , author L. Binkowski ,\ and\ author S. Gupta ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ade8b3 journal journal arXiv:2411.00526 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 arXiv
[77]

\ Shi , author L.-M

author author Y.-Y. \ Shi , author L.-M. \ Duan ,\ and\ author G. Vidal ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.74.022320 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 74 ,\ pages 022320 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

2006 doi
[78]

Singh , author R

author author S. Singh , author R. N. \ Pfeifer ,\ and\ author G. Vidal ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.82.050301 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 82 ,\ pages 050301 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

2010 doi
[79]

Biamonte \ and\ author V

author author J. Biamonte \ and\ author V. Bergholm ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1708.00006 journal journal arXiv:1708.00006 \ ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017 doi arXiv
[80]

Hauschild \ and\ author F

author author J. Hauschild \ and\ author F. Pollmann ,\ https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.5 journal journal SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes \ ,\ pages 005 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018 doi
[81]

Pang , author T

author author Y. Pang , author T. Hao , author A. Dugad , author Y. Zhou ,\ and\ author E. Solomonik ,\ in\ @noop booktitle SC20: Int. Conf. High Perform. Comput. Netw. Storage Anal. \ ( year 2020 )\ pp.\ pages 1--14 NoStop

2020
[82]

Causer , author M

author author L. Causer , author M. C. \ Ba \ n uls ,\ and\ author J. P. \ Garrahan ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.147401 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 130 ,\ pages 147401 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023 doi
[83]

Patra , author S

author author S. Patra , author S. S. \ Jahromi , author S. Singh ,\ and\ author R. Or \'u s ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.6.013326 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 013326 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi
[84]

Gottesman ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9807006 journal journal arXiv:quant-ph/9807006 \ ( year 1998 ) NoStop

author author D. Gottesman ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/9807006 journal journal arXiv:quant-ph/9807006 \ ( year 1998 ) NoStop

1998 doi arXiv
[85]

Aaronson \ and\ author D

author author S. Aaronson \ and\ author D. Gottesman ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.70.052328 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 70 ,\ pages 052328 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

2004 doi
[86]

Nest ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0811.0898 journal journal arXiv:0811.0898 \ ( year 2008 ) NoStop

author author M. Nest ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.0811.0898 journal journal arXiv:0811.0898 \ ( year 2008 ) NoStop

2008 doi arXiv
[88]

Begu s i \'c , author K

author author T. Begu s i \'c , author K. Hejazi ,\ and\ author G. K. \ Chan ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.19896 journal arXiv:2411.19896 \ NoStop

doi arXiv
[89]

journal author author R. D. \ Somma ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0512209 journal journal arXiv:quant-ph/0512209 \ ( year 2005 ) NoStop

2005 doi arXiv
[90]

Somma , author H

author author R. Somma , author H. Barnum , author G. Ortiz ,\ and\ author E. Knill ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.190501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 97 ,\ pages 190501 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

2006 doi
[91]

Galitski ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.012118 journal journal Phys

author author V. Galitski ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.012118 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 84 ,\ pages 012118 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

2011 doi
[92]

author author M. L. \ Goh , author M. Larocca , author L. Cincio , author M. Cerezo ,\ and\ author F. Sauvage ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.01432 journal journal arXiv:2308.01432 \ ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023 doi
[93]

author author E. R. \ Anschuetz , author A. Bauer , author B. T. \ Kiani ,\ and\ author S. Lloyd ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-11-28-1189 journal journal Quantum \ volume 7 ,\ pages 1189 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023 doi
[94]

Gao \ and\ author L

author author X. Gao \ and\ author L. Duan ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.03176 journal journal arXiv:1810.03176 \ ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018 doi arXiv
[95]

Takahashi , author Y

author author Y. Takahashi , author Y. Takeuchi ,\ and\ author S. Tani ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2021.07.025 journal journal Theor. Comput. Sci. \ volume 893 ,\ pages 117 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021 doi
[96]

Shao , author F

author author Y. Shao , author F. Wei , author S. Cheng ,\ and\ author Z. Liu ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.120603 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 133 ,\ pages 120603 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi
[97]

Gonz \'a lez-Garc \' a , author J

author author G. Gonz \'a lez-Garc \' a , author J. I. \ Cirac ,\ and\ author R. Trivedi ,\ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-05-05-1730 journal journal Quantum \ volume 9 ,\ pages 1730 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025 doi
[98]

Rajakumar , author J

author author J. Rajakumar , author J. D. \ Watson ,\ and\ author Y.-K. \ Liu ,\ in\ @noop booktitle ACM-SIAM Symp. Discrete Algorithms \ ( year 2025 )\ pp.\ pages 1037--1056 NoStop

2025
[99]

Tang , author H

author author Y. Tang , author H. Xiong , author N. Yang , author T. Xiao ,\ and\ author J. Yan ,\ in\ @noop booktitle ICLR \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[100]

Wang , author M

author author H. Wang , author M. Weber , author J. Izaac ,\ and\ author C. Y.-Y. \ Lin ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.16943 journal journal arXiv:2211.16943 \ ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022 doi arXiv
[101]

Sweke , author E

author author R. Sweke , author E. Recio-Armengol , author S. Jerbi , author E. Gil-Fuster , author B. Fuller , author J. Eisert ,\ and\ author J. J. \ Meyer ,\ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2025-02-20-1640 journal journal Quantum \ volume 9 ,\ pages 1640 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025 doi
[102]

Fontana , author I

author author E. Fontana , author I. Rungger , author R. Duncan ,\ and\ author C. C \^ rstoiu ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2208.05958 journal journal arXiv:2208.05958 \ ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022 doi arXiv
[103]

author author F. J. \ Schreiber , author J. Eisert ,\ and\ author J. J. \ Meyer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.100803 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 100803 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023 doi
[104]

author author N. A. \ Nemkov , author E. O. \ Kiktenko ,\ and\ author A. K. \ Fedorov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.108.032406 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 108 ,\ pages 032406 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023 doi
[105]

Landman , author S

author author J. Landman , author S. Thabet , author C. Dalyac , author H. Mhiri ,\ and\ author E. Kashefi ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.13200 journal journal arXiv:2210.13200 \ ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022 doi arXiv
[106]

author author B. Y. \ Gan , author P.-W. \ Huang , author E. Gil-Fuster ,\ and\ author P. Rebentrost ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.05116 journal journal arXiv:2408.05116 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi arXiv
[107]

Cerezo , author G

author author M. Cerezo , author G. Verdon , author H.-Y. \ Huang , author L. Cincio ,\ and\ author P. J. \ Coles ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s43588-022-00311-3 journal journal Nat. Comput. Sci. \ volume 2 ,\ pages 567 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

doi
[108]

Bittel \ and\ author M

author author L. Bittel \ and\ author M. Kliesch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.120502 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 127 ,\ pages 120502 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021 doi
[109]

author author J. R. \ McClean , author S. Boixo , author V. N. \ Smelyanskiy , author R. Babbush ,\ and\ author H. Neven ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

doi
[110]

Zhang , author M.-H

author author K. Zhang , author M.-H. \ Hsieh , author L. Liu ,\ and\ author D. Tao ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.06258 journal journal arXiv:2011.06258 \ ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2011 doi arXiv
[111]

Du , author M.-H

author author Y. Du , author M.-H. \ Hsieh , author T. Liu , author S. You ,\ and\ author D. Tao ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.040337 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 040337 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021 doi
[112]

Sweke , author F

author author R. Sweke , author F. Wilde , author J. Meyer , author M. Schuld , author P. K. \ F \"a hrmann , author B. Meynard-Piganeau ,\ and\ author J. Eisert ,\ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-08-31-314 journal journal Quantum \ volume 4 ,\ pages 314 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020 doi
[113]

Cerezo , author M

author author M. Cerezo , author M. Larocca , author D. Garc \' a-Mart \' n , author N. Diaz , author P. Braccia , author E. Fontana , author M. S. \ Rudolph , author P. Bermejo , author A. Ijaz , author S. Thanasilp , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.09121 journa...

doi arXiv
[114]

Sutskever , author J

author author I. Sutskever , author J. Martens , author G. Dahl ,\ and\ author G. Hinton ,\ in\ @noop booktitle ICML ,\ Vol. volume 28 \ ( year 2013 )\ pp.\ pages 1139--1147 NoStop

2013
[115]

Grant , author L

author author E. Grant , author L. Wossnig , author M. Ostaszewski ,\ and\ author M. Benedetti ,\ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2019-12-09-214 journal journal Quantum \ volume 3 ,\ pages 214 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

2019 doi
[116]

Mitarai , author Y

author author K. Mitarai , author Y. Suzuki , author W. Mizukami , author Y. O. \ Nakagawa ,\ and\ author K. Fujii ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.033012 journal journal Phys. Rev. Res. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 033012 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

doi
[117]

Boyd , author S

author author S. Boyd , author S. P. \ Boyd ,\ and\ author L. Vandenberghe ,\ @noop title Convex optimization \ ( publisher Cambridge university press ,\ year 2004 ) NoStop

2004
[118]

\ Park \ and\ author N

author author C.-Y. \ Park \ and\ author N. Killoran ,\ https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2024-02-01-1239 journal journal Quantum \ volume 8 ,\ pages 1239 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi
[119]

Wang , author B

author author Y. Wang , author B. Qi , author C. Ferrie ,\ and\ author D. Dong ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.22.054005 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 22 ,\ pages 054005 ( year 2024 a ) NoStop

2024 doi
[120]

\ Park , author M

author author C.-Y. \ Park , author M. Kang ,\ and\ author J. Huh ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2403.04844 journal journal arXiv:2403.04844 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi arXiv
[121]

Shi \ and\ author Y

author author X. Shi \ and\ author Y. Shang ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.13501 journal journal arXiv:2402.13501 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi arXiv
[122]

Puig , author M

author author R. Puig , author M. Drudis , author S. Thanasilp ,\ and\ author Z. Holmes ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.6.010317 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 6 ,\ pages 010317 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025 doi
[123]

Mhiri , author R

author author H. Mhiri , author R. Puig , author S. Lerch , author M. S. \ Rudolph , author T. Chotibut , author S. Thanasilp ,\ and\ author Z. Holmes ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.07889 journal journal arXiv:2502.07889 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

doi arXiv
[124]

\ Liu , author T.-P

author author H.-Y. \ Liu , author T.-P. \ Sun , author Y.-C. \ Wu , author Y.-J. \ Han ,\ and\ author G.-P. \ Guo ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/acb58e journal journal New J. Phys. \ volume 25 ,\ pages 013039 ( year 2023 a ) NoStop

doi
[125]

author author A. A. \ Mele , author G. B. \ Mbeng , author G. E. \ Santoro , author M. Collura ,\ and\ author P. Torta ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.L060401 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 106 ,\ pages L060401 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

doi
[126]

Dborin , author F

author author J. Dborin , author F. Barratt , author V. Wimalaweera , author L. Wright ,\ and\ author A. G. \ Green ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/ac7073 journal journal Quantum Sci. Technol. \ volume 7 ,\ pages 035014 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

doi
[127]

Shaffer , author L

author author R. Shaffer , author L. Kocia ,\ and\ author M. Sarovar ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.107.032415 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 107 ,\ pages 032415 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023 doi
[128]

author author M. S. \ Rudolph , author J. Miller , author D. Motlagh , author J. Chen , author A. Acharya ,\ and\ author A. Perdomo-Ortiz ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43908-6 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 14 ,\ pages 8367 ( year 2023 b ) NoStop

doi
[129]

Verdon , author M

author author G. Verdon , author M. Broughton , author J. R. \ McClean , author K. J. \ Sung , author R. Babbush , author Z. Jiang , author H. Neven ,\ and\ author M. Mohseni ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.05415 journal journal arXiv:1907.05415 \ ( year 2019 ) NoStop

1907 doi arXiv
[130]

Cervera-Lierta , author J

author author A. Cervera-Lierta , author J. S. \ Kottmann ,\ and\ author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.020329 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 020329 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021 doi
[131]

Luo , author J

author author D. Luo , author J. Shen , author R. Dangovski ,\ and\ author M. Soljacic ,\ in\ @noop booktitle NIPS ,\ Vol. volume 36 \ ( year 2023 )\ pp.\ pages 25662--25692 NoStop

2023
[132]

author author E. P. \ Van Nieuwenburg , author Y.-H. \ Liu ,\ and\ author S. D. \ Huber ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4037 journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 435 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017 doi
[133]

Carrasquilla \ and\ author R

author author J. Carrasquilla \ and\ author R. G. \ Melko ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4035 journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 13 ,\ pages 431 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017 doi
[134]

Ch’ng , author J

author author K. Ch’ng , author J. Carrasquilla , author R. G. \ Melko ,\ and\ author E. Khatami ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.031038 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 7 ,\ pages 031038 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017 doi
[135]

\ Huang , author R

author author H.-Y. \ Huang , author R. Kueng , author G. Torlai , author V. V. \ Albert ,\ and\ author J. Preskill ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abk3333 journal journal Science \ volume 377 ,\ pages eabk3333 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

doi
[136]

Kasatkin , author E

author author V. Kasatkin , author E. Mozgunov , author N. Ezzell ,\ and\ author D. Lidar ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.03418 journal journal arXiv:2408.03418 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi arXiv
[137]

Saunders , author A

author author C. Saunders , author A. Gammerman ,\ and\ author V. Vovk ,\ in\ @noop booktitle ICML \ ( year 1998 )\ p.\ pages 515–521 NoStop

1998
[138]

Mehyar , author A

author author M. Mehyar , author A. Rostamizadeh ,\ and\ author A. Talwalkar ,\ @noop title Foundations of machine learning \ ( publisher MIT Press ,\ year 2018 ) NoStop

2018
[139]

Bharti , author A

author author K. Bharti , author A. Cervera-Lierta , author T. H. \ Kyaw , author T. Haug , author S. Alperin-Lea , author A. Anand , author M. Degroote , author H. Heimonen , author J. S. \ Kottmann , author T. Menke , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.015004 jo...

doi
[140]

Mitarai , author M

author author K. Mitarai , author M. Negoro , author M. Kitagawa ,\ and\ author K. Fujii ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.98.032309 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 98 ,\ pages 032309 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018 doi
[141]

Havl \' c ek , author A

author author V. Havl \' c ek , author A. D. \ C \'o rcoles , author K. Temme , author A. W. \ Harrow , author A. Kandala , author J. M. \ Chow ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Gambetta ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0980-2 journal journal Nature \ volume 567 ,\ pages 209 ( year ...

doi
[142]

Peruzzo , author J

author author A. Peruzzo , author J. McClean , author P. Shadbolt , author M.-H. \ Yung , author X.-Q. \ Zhou , author P. J. \ Love , author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ and\ author J. L. \ O’brien ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5213 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 42...

doi
[143]

\ Huang , author M

author author H.-Y. \ Huang , author M. Broughton , author M. Mohseni , author R. Babbush , author S. Boixo , author H. Neven ,\ and\ author J. R. \ McClean ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22539-9 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

doi
[144]

Liu , author S

author author Y. Liu , author S. Arunachalam ,\ and\ author K. Temme ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01287-z journal journal Nat. Phys. \ volume 17 ,\ pages 1013 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021 doi
[145]

Du , author Y

author author Y. Du , author Y. Yang , author D. Tao ,\ and\ author M.-H. \ Hsieh ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.140601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 131 ,\ pages 140601 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023 doi
[146]

Wang , author Y

author author X. Wang , author Y. Du , author Z. Tu , author Y. Luo , author X. Yuan ,\ and\ author D. Tao ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-47983-1 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 3716 ( year 2024 b ) NoStop

doi
[147]

Farhi , author J

author author E. Farhi , author J. Goldstone ,\ and\ author S. Gutmann ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1411.4028 journal journal arXiv:1411.4028 \ ( year 2014 ) NoStop

2014 doi arXiv
[148]

Zhou , author S.-T

author author L. Zhou , author S.-T. \ Wang , author S. Choi , author H. Pichler ,\ and\ author M. D. \ Lukin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021067 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 10 ,\ pages 021067 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020 doi
[149]

Kandala , author A

author author A. Kandala , author A. Mezzacapo , author K. Temme , author M. Takita , author M. Brink , author J. M. \ Chow ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Gambetta ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23879 journal journal Nature \ volume 549 ,\ pages 242 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

doi
[150]

Kim , author A

author author Y. Kim , author A. Eddins , author S. Anand , author K. X. \ Wei , author E. Van Den Berg , author S. Rosenblatt , author H. Nayfeh , author Y. Wu , author M. Zaletel , author K. Temme , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06096-3 journal journal Nature ...

doi
[151]

Cao , author J

author author Y. Cao , author J. Romero , author J. P. \ Olson , author M. Degroote , author P. D. \ Johnson , author M. Kieferov \'a , author I. D. \ Kivlichan , author T. Menke , author B. Peropadre , author N. P. \ Sawaya , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00...

doi
[152]

Abbas , author R

author author A. Abbas , author R. King , author H.-Y. \ Huang , author W. J. \ Huggins , author R. Movassagh , author D. Gilboa ,\ and\ author J. McClean ,\ in\ @noop booktitle NeurIPS ,\ Vol. volume 36 \ ( year 2023 )\ pp.\ pages 44792--44819 NoStop

2023
[153]

You , author S

author author X. You , author S. Chakrabarti ,\ and\ author X. Wu ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.12481 journal journal arXiv:2205.12481 \ ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022 doi arXiv
[154]

Liu , author K

author author J. Liu , author K. Najafi , author K. Sharma , author F. Tacchino , author L. Jiang ,\ and\ author A. Mezzacapo ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.150601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 130 ,\ pages 150601 ( year 2023 b ) NoStop

doi
[155]

author author J. I. \ Latorre \ and\ author R. Or \'u s ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.062302 journal journal Phys. Rev. A \ volume 69 ,\ pages 062302 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

2004 doi
[156]

Cao , author F

author author C. Cao , author F. M. \ Gambetta , author A. Montanaro ,\ and\ author R. A. \ Santos ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-025-01038-5 journal journal npj Quantum Inf. \ volume 11 ,\ pages 93 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

doi
[157]

author author D. P. \ Kingma \ and\ author J. Ba ,\ in\ @noop booktitle ICLR \ ( year 2015 ) NoStop

2015
[158]

Morales-Brotons , author T

author author D. Morales-Brotons , author T. Vogels ,\ and\ author H. Hendrikx ,\ https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.18704 journal journal arXiv:2411.18704 \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024 doi arXiv
[159]

Lu , author P.-X

author author Z. Lu , author P.-X. \ Shen ,\ and\ author D.-L. \ Deng ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.044039 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 044039 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [39]

Du , author M.-H

author author Y. Du , author M.-H. \ Hsieh ,\ and\ author D. Tao ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-59198-z journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 3790 ( year 2025 a ) NoStop

work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59198-z 2025

[2] [52]

Fontana , author M

author author E. Fontana , author M. S. \ Rudolph , author R. Duncan , author I. Rungger ,\ and\ author C. C \^i rstoiu ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-024-00955-1 journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 11 ,\ pages 84 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

doi:10.1038/s41534-024-00955-1

[3] [1]

Bluvstein , author S

author author D. Bluvstein , author S. J. \ Evered , author A. A. \ Geim , author S. H. \ Li , author H. Zhou , author T. Manovitz , author S. Ebadi , author M. Cain , author M. Kalinowski , author D. Hangleiter , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06927-3 journal journal Nature \ volume 626 ,\ pages 58 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06927-3

[4] [2]

author author G. Q. \ AI \ and\ author Collaborators ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y journal journal Nature \ volume 638 ,\ pages 920 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08449-y 2025

[5] [3]

Gao , author D

author author D. Gao , author D. Fan , author C. Zha , author J. Bei , author G. Cai , author J. Cai , author S. Cao , author X. Zeng , author F. Chen , author J. Chen , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.090601 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 134 ,\ pages 090601 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.090601

[6] [4]

Arute , author K

author author F. Arute , author K. Arya , author R. Babbush , author D. Bacon , author J. C. \ Bardin , author R. Barends , author R. Biswas , author S. Boixo , author F. G. \ Brandao , author D. A. \ Buell , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 journal journal Nature \ volume 574 ,\ pages 505 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5

[7] [5]

\ Zhong , author H

author author H.-S. \ Zhong , author H. Wang , author Y.-H. \ Deng , author M.-C. \ Chen , author L.-C. \ Peng , author Y.-H. \ Luo , author J. Qin , author D. Wu , author X. Ding , author Y. Hu , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe8770 journal journal Science \ volume 370 ,\ pages 1460 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

doi:10.1126/science.abe8770

[8] [6]

Wu , author W.-S

author author Y. Wu , author W.-S. \ Bao , author S. Cao , author F. Chen , author M.-C. \ Chen , author X. Chen , author T.-H. \ Chung , author H. Deng , author Y. Du , author D. Fan , et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.180501 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 127 ,\ pages 180501 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.180501