Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 122 references

Unlocking new regimes in fractional quantum Hall effect with quaternions

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A quaternion reformulation of composite-fermion wave functions extends quantitative fractional quantum Hall calculations to hundreds of electrons and reveals no instability along the Jain sequence up to ν=15/31.

desk verdict A real computational advance wrapped in a physics claim that overreaches its evidence; the method deserves review, the robustness conclusion needs qualification. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.09670 v1 pith:JJMEI65L submitted 2024-12-12 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallgr-qc

Mytraya Gattu , J. K. Jain This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hallgr-qc PACS 73.43.-f71.10.Pm
keywords fractionalquantumHalleffectcompositefermionsquaternionsmonopoleharmonicslowestLandaulevelprojectionJainsequencemagneto-rotonnematicinstability
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a quaternion-based formulation of composite-fermion (CF) wave functions for the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE). The new formulation makes the Jain-Kamilla lowest-Landau-level projection dramatically faster and numerically stable, extending reliable calculations from Jain states with index $n$ between $-5$ and $7$ to at least $n$ between $-20$ and $20$ for systems with more than 400 electrons. As a first application, the authors compute magneto-roton (neutral CF exciton) dispersions along the Jain sequence $\nu = n/(2n+1)$ up to $\nu = 15/31$ and find no sign of an instability, concluding that the FQHE along this sequence is highly robust and that the composite-fermion Fermi sea at $\nu = 1/2$ shows no nematic or charge-density-wave instability in these calculations. If correct, this method opens many previously inaccessible questions in FQHE to quantitative study.

What carries the argument

The central object is the quaternion extension of the monopole harmonics, $Y_{Q,l,m}(r)$, built from the symmetric and antisymmetric projections of a unit quaternion $r$; these transform ordinarily under quaternion multiplication with no extra phase. The load-bearing identity is that the Jastrow factor $d(r_i,r_j) = (r_i^{-1} \cdot r_j)_A$ is invariant under left multiplication, so the LLL projection can be done after rotating electron $i$ to $r_i = 1$. There the projection of $Y_{Q^*,l,m}$ times the Jastrow product becomes a sum of Wigner-$D$ matrices times (regularized) elementary symmetric polynomials in the variables $(r_i^{-1} \cdot r_j)_S / (r_i^{-1} \cdot r_j)_A$, and only $l_{\max} - Q^* + 1$ such polynomials are needed per column. This replaces the quadratic number of numerically unstable mixed derivatives in the standard Jain-Kamilla projection with a linear, stable computation.

What would settle it

Compute the low-energy neutral excitations of a large-$n$ Jain state such as $\nu = 8/17$ or $\nu = 10/21$ with an unbiased method (e.g., exact diagonalization on small systems or DMRG on a cylinder) and compare the magneto-roton dispersion with the quaternion CF result; a negative-energy roton, or a rapid decay of the CF wave-function overlap with system size, would overturn the robustness conclusion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that rewriting the Jain CF wave functions in terms of quaternions (unit quaternions parametrized as $r = e^{\phi k/2} e^{\theta j/2} e^{\psi k/2}$) removes the phase-factor obstruction that makes monopole harmonics awkward under rotations, and reveals that the Jastrow factor $(u_i v_j - u_j v_i)$ is a quaternion displacement invariant under left quaternion multiplication. This invariance lets one rotate each electron to the identity quaternion before performing the lowest-Landau-level projection, where the projection reduces to computing elementary symmetric polynomials. The required number of such polynomials scales linearly with the CF Landau-level index $l_{\max} - Q^*$ rather than quadratically, and they can be evaluated accurately in double precision. The authors thereby reach Jain states $\nu = n/(2n+1)$ with $n$ up to 15 (and state the method works for about $-20$ to $20$) and hundreds of electrons, e.g., $N = 390$ at $\nu = 15/31$ whose Fock dimension is $\sim 10^{236}$. Using this tool, they compute magneto-roton dispersions and find that the excitation energy never goes negative, indicating no instability of the FQHE along $n/(2n+1)$ and no instability of the HLR Fermi sea at $\nu = 1/2$, while the same calculation in the second Landau level does show instabilities at $\nu = 2/5$ and $3/7$, consistent with the Read-Rezayi physics there.

Load-bearing premise

The entire calculation treats the Jain-Kamilla projected composite-fermion wave functions as quantitatively accurate representations of the true Coulomb ground and excited states, a benchmarked assumption only for fillings up to about $n = 7$; for the new large-$n$ systems there is no independent check.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Reliable CF calculations for Jain states with hundreds of electrons, enabling quantitative study of thermodynamic limits of energy gaps, dispersions, and phase boundaries.
  • Ability to probe the approach to $\nu = 1/2$: the magneto-roton gap at $k \to 0$ approaches zero but does not become negative, consistent with a stable CF Fermi sea.
  • New access to reverse-flux Jain states ($\nu = n/(2n-1)$, negative $n$) and larger system sizes for previously accessible fractions, improving benchmarks against experiments.
  • The second Landau level results show the method can detect genuine instabilities (at $\nu = 2/5$ and $3/7$), demonstrating that the absence of instability in the LLL is a nontrivial finding.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the quaternion formulation is as stable as claimed, it may be extended to other projected wave functions beyond Jain states, such as parton states or paired CF states, where LLL projection is also a bottleneck.
  • The linear scaling in $l_{\max} - Q^*$ suggests the method could be pushed to even higher $n$ or to systems with larger $Q^*$ (higher Landau levels), possibly testing the stability of FQHE arbitrarily close to $\nu = 1/2$.
  • The paper's identification of many approximately equally spaced magneto-roton minima ($n$ minima for $\nu = n/(2n+1)$) could be connected to the higher-spin description of magneto-rotons; the method could be used to extract the chirality or spin content of these modes.
  • A testable prediction implied by the robustness result: in ultra-clean samples, Jain states with $n$ as high as $15/31$ (and beyond) should be experimentally observable in the lowest Landau level, and their neutral mode dispersions should show the predicted multi-minimum structure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a quaternion-based reformulation of the Jain-Kamilla (JK) lowest-Landau-level projection for composite-fermion wave functions on the sphere, claims access to Jain states with n in the range -20 <= n <= 20 and with more than 400 electrons, and uses the method to compute magneto-roton dispersions for filling factors up to nu = 15/31 as well as the k -> 0 CF-exciton energy for the CF Fermi sea at nu = 1/2. The authors report no magneto-roton instability along the sequence n/(2n+1), interpret this as evidence for extraordinary robustness of the FQHE approaching half filling, and contrast it with an instability at 2/5 and 3/7 in the second Landau level, where they explicitly note that the JK ansatz is less accurate.

Significance. The numerical method is a potentially important technical advance: the Supplementary Material contains a detailed derivation of the quaternion JK projection, shows that the cost scales linearly in l_max - Q*, and validates the implementation against higher-precision arithmetic to about 10^-14 accuracy. If the physics conclusion is correct, the paper provides a strong statement about the stability of the Jain sequence and the HLR Fermi sea in the lowest Landau level. However, the central physics claim rests on the untested accuracy of the JK trial wave functions in the newly accessed large-n regime, and the k -> 0 extrapolation is a delicate sign test. These issues are load-bearing and need to be addressed before the conclusion can be accepted as stated.

major comments (2)
  1. [SM Sec. II; main text Fig. 2] The accuracy validation in SM Fig. 3 benchmarks the new quaternion implementation against the same JK ansatz evaluated in higher precision; it does not establish that the JK ansatz itself approximates the exact Coulomb ground and neutral excited states for n > 7. For n up to about 7 this is supported by previous exact-diagonalization comparisons, but for nu = 8/17 through 15/31 with N up to 390 no independent benchmark is provided. Because Delta E is computed as the expectation value of the Coulomb interaction in a single CF-exciton trial state, a positive Delta E is a variational upper bound on the true neutral gap and cannot exclude a different soft mode or a negative true gap. The paper flags this accuracy caveat for the second Landau level but not for the lowest Landau level at large n; a small-system exact-diagonalization comparison of the lowest magneto-roton branch at, for example, nu = 8/17 or 9/19 would directly test the load-bearing assumption.
  2. [Main text Fig. 3a; SM Sec. III] The conclusion that the CF Fermi sea at nu = 1/2 has no nematic instability is based on the N -> infinity extrapolation of Delta E(k -> 0) for N = n^2 with n = 8..18. The plotted energies decrease slowly, and the published figure does not show a fitted functional form, a confidence interval for the thermodynamic limit, or alternative extrapolation forms. The shell-closed choice N = n^2 may also introduce systematic shell effects. The statement that the energy 'approaches zero (rather than a negative value)' needs quantitative support, such as a linear or quadratic extrapolation with an uncertainty estimate; otherwise the claim should be softened to 'no evidence for instability in the studied systems.'
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (11), main text] The displayed expression for N_l^{m',Q*,Q1} contains typesetting artifacts ('radicaltp/radicalvertex'), which should be corrected to a properly typeset square root.
  2. [Abstract and SM Sec. II] The abstract contains the typo 'Suplementary', and SM Sec. II contains the repeated phrase 'called Λ levels called Λ levels'; both should be fixed.
  3. [SM Sec. II, after Eq. (12)] The claim that the method handles 'at least -20 <= n <= 20' is supported by the SM timing and accuracy figures, but the main text states this without referencing those figures; adding a cross-reference would help readers locate the evidence.
  4. [SM Sec. III and main text Fig. 2] The Monte Carlo sample size and error estimation procedure are described in the SM but not in the main text; a brief sentence stating the number of samples and the jackknife procedure would improve the reproducibility of Fig. 2.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the no-instability result is a variational energy calculation with a positive control, and the implementation benchmarks are numerical rather than physical.

full rationale

I find no circular step. The central result—that the CF-exciton dispersion remains positive along ν=n/(2n+1) and at the Q*=0 Fermi sea—is a variational energy calculation: ΔE is the difference of Coulomb expectation values in distinct CF trial states, and the sign is not fixed by the ansatz. This is demonstrated by the paper's positive control: the same method produces a negative ΔE (an instability) at ν=2/5 and 3/7 in the second Landau level (Fig. 3b, main text). The quaternion implementation is validated in SM Fig. 3 against higher-precision traditional JK evaluation; that checks numerical accuracy, not the physics conclusion. The underlying JK/CF wave functions are cited as benchmarked against exact diagonalization (Refs. 7–10), an external standard independent of any fitted values (the paper has none). The only genuine concern is that no independent ED benchmark exists for the newly reached n>7 systems (N up to 390), and the paper itself flags that the Jain wave functions are less accurate in the second LL; these are correctness and robustness risks, not circularity, because the conclusion does not reduce to an input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central method has no fitted free parameters and introduces no new physical entities. Its load-bearing assumptions are standard mathematical facts about quaternions and monopole harmonics, plus domain assumptions inherited from composite fermion theory: the JK wave functions and single-CF-exciton description remain accurate in the newly accessed regime. The latter is plausible but not directly verified for n greater than 7.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The Jain-Kamilla ansatz gives an accurate approximation to the LLL-projected composite fermion wave functions and to the exact Coulomb ground states for the fillings considered.
    The method evaluates JK wave functions and the physics conclusions inherit their accuracy. Prior ED benchmarks cover small n (n up to about 7); for n up to 15 this is assumed in the application section and in SM Sec. II.
  • domain assumption The lowest neutral mode is described by a single CF exciton, i.e., one CF particle-hole pair.
    The magneto-roton instability search is restricted to CF excitons referenced to Dev and Jain and Scarola et al.; other competing orders, such as stripes or paired states, are not probed.
  • domain assumption A softening of the k approaching 0 CF exciton diagnoses a nematic instability of the nu=1/2 composite fermion Fermi sea.
    Used in the analysis of Fig. 3a, following the field-theoretic treatments in Refs. [77-81].
  • standard math The quaternion transformation rules for monopole harmonics and Wigner D matrices from Boyle and Wu-Yang apply to the extension of many-body wave functions.
    Foundation of the derivation in SM Sec. II; the paper cites Boyle and Wu-Yang and Dray for this mathematics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Unlocking new regimes in fractional quantum Hall effect with quaternions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JJMEI65L

@misc{pith2026241209670,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Unlocking new regimes in fractional quantum Hall effect with quaternions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JJMEI65L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.09670}
}
read the original abstract

We demonstrate that formulating the composite-fermion theory of the fractional quantum Hall (FQH) effect in terms of quaternions greatly expands its reach and opens the door into many interesting issues that were previously beyond the reach of quantitative theoretical investigation. As an illustration, we investigate the possibility of a nematic or a charge-density wave instability of the composite-fermion Fermi sea at half-filled Landau level and of the nearby FQH states by looking for a magneto-roton instability. Our quaternion formulation of the FQH effect has been inspired by mathematical developments in the theoretical analyses of gravitational wave modes and cosmic microwave background radiation, where an important role is played by spin-weighted spherical harmonics which are nothing but monopole harmonics appearing in the spherical geometry for the FQH effect.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.09670 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The schematic on the left illustrates an incompressible [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. a) Excitation energy ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The plots show the excitation energies ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. In the top row, for rotations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. For the rotation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png]
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The top plot shows the relative error in the (absolute [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. In this figure, we plot the time needed to run a Monte [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. In this figure, we plot the ratio of the time to run a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. This figure shows the excitation energy ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard. Two- dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit. Phys. Rev. Lett., 48:1559–1562, May 1982. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1559. URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.1559

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.48.1559 1982

  2. [2]

    J. K. Jain. Composite-fermion approach for the frac- tional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett., 63:199– 202, Jul 1989. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.199. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.63. 199

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.63.199 1989

  3. [4]

    Fractional Quantum Hall Effects New Developments

    Bertrand I Halperin and Jainendra K Jain, editors. Fractional Quantum Hall Effects New Developments. World Scientific, 2020. doi:10.1142/11751. URL https: //worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/11751

    doi:10.1142/11751 2020

  4. [5]

    Gautam Dev and J. K. Jain. Band structure of the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett., 69:2843–2846, Nov 1992. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2843. URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2843

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.69.2843 1992

  5. [6]

    X. G. Wu, G. Dev, and J. K. Jain. Mixed-spin in- compressible states in the fractional quantum hall ef- fect. Physical Review Letters, 71(1):153–156, July 1993. ISSN 0031-9007. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.153. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.153

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.153 1993

  6. [8]

    J. K. Jain and R. K. Kamilla. Quantita- tive study of large composite-fermion systems. Phys. Rev. B, 55:R4895–R4898, Feb 1997. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R4895. URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R4895

    doi:10.1103/physrevb.55.r4895 1997

  7. [10]

    J. K. Jain. Thirty Years of Composite Fermions and Beyond. In B. I. Halperin and J. K. Jain, editors, Fractional Quantum Hall Effects: New Developments, chapter 1, pages 1–78. World Scientific Pub Co Inc, Singapore, 2020. doi:10.1142/9789811217494˙0001. URL https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/ 10.1142/9789811217494_0001

    doi:10.1142/9789811217494 2020

  8. [11]

    R. R. Du, H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeif- fer, and K. W. West. Experimental evidence for new particles in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70:2944–2947, May 1993. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2944. URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2944

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.2944 1993

Show all 122 references
  1. [12]

    H. C. Manoharan, M. Shayegan, and S. J. Klepper. Signatures of a novel Fermi liquid in a two-dimensional composite particle metal. Phys. Rev. Lett., 73:3270–3273, Dec 1994. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.3270. URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.3270

    1994 doi

  2. [13]

    K. A. Villegas Rosales, P. T. Madathil, Y. J. Chung, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, K. W. Bald- win, and M. Shayegan. Fractional quantum hall effect energy gaps: Role of electron layer thick- ness. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:056801, Jul 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.056801. URL h...

    2021 doi

  3. [14]

    Tongzhou Zhao, Koji Kudo, W. N. Faugno, Ajit C. Balram, and J. K. Jain. Revisiting excitation gaps in the fractional quantum hall effect. Phys. Rev. B, 105: 205147, May 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.205147. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 105.205147

    2022 doi

  4. [15]

    Pinczuk, B

    A. Pinczuk, B. S. Dennis, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. West. Observation of collective excitations in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett., 70:3983–3986, Jun 1993. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3983. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70. 3983

    1993 doi

  5. [16]

    Scarola, Kwon Park, and Jainendra K

    Vito W. Scarola, Kwon Park, and Jainendra K. Jain. Rotons of composite fermions: Comparison between theory and experiment. Phys. Rev. B, 61:13064–13072, May 2000. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.61.13064. URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.13064

    doi

  6. [17]

    Pinczuk, B

    Moonsoo Kang, A. Pinczuk, B. S. Dennis, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West. Observation of multi- ple magnetorotons in the fractional quantum Hall ef- fect. Phys. Rev. Lett., 86:2637–2640, Mar 2001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2637. URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2637

    2001 doi

  7. [18]

    Pinczuk, Moonsoo Kang, B

    Irene Dujovne, A. Pinczuk, Moonsoo Kang, B. S. Den- nis, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West. Composite-fermion spin excitations asν approaches 1/2: Interactions in the Fermi sea. Phys. Rev. Lett., 95:056808, Jul 2005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.056808. URL http://link. aps.org/do...

    2005 doi

  8. [19]

    Gunnar M¨ oller and Steven H. Simon. Composite fermions in a negative effective magnetic field: A Monte Carlo study. Phys. Rev. B, 72:045344, Jul 2005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.045344. URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.045344

    2005 doi

  9. [20]

    Kukushkin, Jurgen H

    Igor V. Kukushkin, Jurgen H. Smet, Vito W. Scarola, Vladimir Umansky, and Klaus von Klitz- ing. Dispersion of the excitations of fractional 6 quantum Hall states. Science, 324(5930):1044–1047,

  10. [21]

    Rhone, Dwipesh Majumder, Brian S

    Trevor D. Rhone, Dwipesh Majumder, Brian S. Den- nis, Cyrus Hirjibehedin, Irene Dujovne, Javier G. Groshaus, Yann Gallais, Jainendra K. Jain, Sud- hansu S. Mandal, Aron Pinczuk, Loren Pfeif- fer, and Ken West. Higher-energy composite fermion levels in the fractional quantum Ha...

    2011 doi

  11. [22]

    Balram, Zhao Liu, Andrey Gromov, and Zlatko Papi´ c

    Ajit C. Balram, Zhao Liu, Andrey Gromov, and Zlatko Papi´ c. Very-high-energy collective states of partons in fractional quantum hall liquids. Phys. Rev. X, 12: 021008, Apr 2022. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.12.021008. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX. 12.021008

    2022 doi

  12. [23]

    Dwipesh Majumder and Sudhansu S. Mandal. Neu- tral collective modes in spin-polarized fractional quan- tum Hall states at filling factors 1 3, 2 5, 3 7, and 4

  13. [24]

    R. R. Du, A. S. Yeh, H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West. Fractional quantum Hall effect around ν = 3 /2: Composite fermions with a spin. Phys. Rev. Lett., 75:3926–3929, Nov 1995. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3926. URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/Phys...

    1995 doi

  14. [25]

    Phys. Rev. B, 90:155310, Oct 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.155310. URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.155310

    2014 doi

  15. [26]

    Park and J

    K. Park and J. K. Jain. Phase diagram of the spin polarization of composite fermions and a new effective mass. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80:4237–4240, May 1998. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4237. URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4237

    1998 doi

  16. [27]

    R. R. Du, A. S. Yeh, H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West. g factor of composite fermions around ν = 3 /2 from angular-dependent activation-energy measure- ments. Phys. Rev. B, 55:R7351–R7354, Mar 1997. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R7351. URL http://link.aps. ...

    1997 doi

  17. [28]

    N. C. Bishop, M. Padmanabhan, K. Vakili, Y. P. Shkolnikov, E. P. De Poortere, and M. Shayegan. Valley polarization and susceptibility of compos- ite fermions around a filling factor ν = 3 /2. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:266404, Jun 2007. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.266404. URL http:/...

    2007 doi

  18. [29]

    I. V. Kukushkin, K. v. Klitzing, and K. Eberl. Spin polarization of composite fermions: Measurements of the Fermi energy. Phys. Rev. Lett., 82:3665–3668, May

  19. [31]

    Hasdemir, J

    Yang Liu, S. Hasdemir, J. Shabani, M. Shayegan, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and K. W. Baldwin. Multicompo- nent fractional quantum Hall states with subband and spin degrees of freedom. Phys. Rev. B, 92:201101, Nov

  20. [32]

    Gokmen, and M

    Medini Padmanabhan, T. Gokmen, and M. Shayegan. Composite fermion valley polarization energies: Evi- dence for particle-hole asymmetry. Phys. Rev. B, 81: 113301, Mar 2010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.113301. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 81.113301

    2010 doi

  21. [33]

    Archer, Kwon Park, and Jainendra K

    Alexander C. Archer, Kwon Park, and Jainendra K. Jain. Competing crystal phases in the lowest Landau level. Phys. Rev. Lett., 111:146804, Oct 2013. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.146804

    2013 doi

  22. [34]

    Kamburov, S

    Yang Liu, D. Kamburov, S. Hasdemir, M. Shayegan, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and K. W. Bald- win. Fractional quantum Hall effect and Wigner crystal of interacting composite fermions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 113:246803, Dec 2014. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.246803. URL http://link. ...

    2014 doi

  23. [37]

    P. T. Madathil, C. Wang, S. K. Singh, A. Gupta, K. A. Villegas Rosales, Y. J. Chung, K. W. West, K. W. Baldwin, L. N. Pfeiffer, L. W. Engel, and M. Shayegan. Signatures of correlated defects in an ultraclean wigner crystal in the extreme quantum limit. Phys. Rev. Lett., 132:09...

    2024 doi

  24. [38]

    B. I. Halperin, Patrick A. Lee, and Nicholas Read. The- ory of the half-filled Landau level. Phys. Rev. B, 47: 7312–7343, Mar 1993. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.47.7312. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 47.7312

    1993 doi

  25. [39]

    Rezayi and N

    E. Rezayi and N. Read. Fermi-liquid-like state in a half- filled Landau level. Phys. Rev. Lett., 72:900–903, Feb

  26. [40]

    E. H. Rezayi and F. D. M. Haldane. Incompress- ible paired Hall state, stripe order, and the com- posite fermion liquid phase in half-filled Landau lev- els. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84:4685–4688, May 2000. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.4685. URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRe...

    doi

  27. [41]

    K. A. Villegas Rosales, S. K. Singh, Meng K. Ma, Md. Shafayat Hossain, Y. J. Chung, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, K. W. Baldwin, and M. Shayegan. Com- petition between fractional quantum hall liquid and wigner solid at small fillings: Role of layer thickness and landau level mix...

    2021 doi

  28. [42]

    Fremling, N

    M. Fremling, N. Moran, J. K. Slingerland, and S. H. Simon. Trial wave functions for a composite Fermi liq- uid on a torus. Phys. Rev. B, 97:035149, Jan 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.035149. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.035149

    2018 doi

  29. [43]

    Geraedts, Jie Wang, E

    Scott D. Geraedts, Jie Wang, E. H. Rezayi, and F. D. M. Haldane. Berry phase and model wave function in the half-filled Landau level. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:147202, Oct 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.147202. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.147202

    2018 doi

  30. [44]

    Balram, and J

    Anirban Sharma, Ajit C. Balram, and J. K. Jain. Composite-fermion pairing at half-filled and quarter- filled lowest landau level. Phys. Rev. B, 109:035306, Jan

  31. [45]

    Henderson, Gunnar M¨ oller, and Steven H

    Greg J. Henderson, Gunnar M¨ oller, and Steven H. Simon. Energy minimization of paired compos- ite fermion wave functions in the spherical geome- try. Phys. Rev. B, 108:245128, Dec 2023. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.108.245128. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.245128

    2023 doi

  32. [46]

    M¨ oller and S

    G. M¨ oller and S. H. Simon. Paired composite-fermion wave functions. Phys. Rev. B, 77:075319, Feb 2008. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.075319. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.075319

    2008 doi

  33. [47]

    Kyungmin Lee, Junping Shao, Eun-Ah Kim, 7 F. D. M. Haldane, and Edward H. Rezayi. Pomer- anchuk instability of composite fermi liquids. Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:147601, Oct 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.147601. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.147601

    2018 doi

  34. [48]

    Y. W. Suen, H. C. Manoharan, X. Ying, M. B. San- tos, and M. Shayegan. Origin of the ν = 1/2 frac- tional quantum Hall state in wide single quantum wells. Phys. Rev. Lett., 72:3405–3408, May 1994. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.3405. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevL...

    1994 doi

  35. [49]

    Balram, Maissam Barkeshli, and Mark S

    Ajit C. Balram, Maissam Barkeshli, and Mark S. Rud- ner. Parton construction of a wave function in the anti-Pfaffian phase. Phys. Rev. B, 98:035127, Jul 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.035127. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.035127

    2018 doi

  36. [50]

    Nguyen, Steven H

    Glenn Wagner, Dung X. Nguyen, Steven H. Simon, and Bertrand I. Halperin. s-wave paired electron and hole composite fermion trial state for quantum hall bilayers withν = 1. Phys. Rev. Lett., 127:246803, Dec 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.246803. URL https://link. aps.org/do...

    2021 doi

  37. [51]

    Gupta, S

    Chengyu Wang, A. Gupta, S. K. Singh, Y. J. Chung, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, K. W. Bald- win, R. Winkler, and M. Shayegan. Even-denominator fractional quantum hall state at filling factor ν = 3/4. Phys. Rev. Lett., 129:156801, Oct 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.156801. UR...

    2022 doi

  38. [52]

    Gupta, S

    Chengyu Wang, A. Gupta, S. K. Singh, P. T. Ma- dathil, Y. J. Chung, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Bald- win, R. Winkler, and M. Shayegan. Fractional quantum hall state at filling factor ν = 1 /4 in ultra-high-quality gaas two-dimensional hole systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 131:266502, Dec...

    2023 doi

  39. [53]

    Phase diagram of compressible and paired states in the quarter-filled landau level

    Misha Yutushui and David F Mross. Phase diagram of compressible and paired states in the quarter-filled landau level. arXiv [cond-mat.str-el], August 2024. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.235302

    2024 doi

  40. [54]

    Moran, A

    N. Moran, A. Sterdyniak, I. Vidanovi´ c, N. Regnault, and M. V. Milovanovi´ c. Topological d-wave pairing structures in jain states. Phys. Rev. B, 85:245307, Jun

  41. [55]

    Halperin, and Philip Kim

    Xiaomeng Liu, Zeyu Hao, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Bertrand I. Halperin, and Philip Kim. In- terlayer fractional quantum Hall effect in a coupled graphene double layer. Nature Physics, 15(9):893–897,

  42. [56]

    V. W. Scarola and J. K. Jain. Phase diagram of bilayer composite fermion states. Phys. Rev. B, 64:085313, Aug

  43. [57]

    Simon, and Edward H

    Gunnar M¨ oller, Steven H. Simon, and Edward H. Rezayi. Trial wave functions for ν = 1 2 + 1 2 quan- tum hall bilayers. Phys. Rev. B, 79:125106, Mar 2009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.125106. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.125106

    2009 doi

  44. [58]

    exciton fermi sea

    Michael P. Zaletel, Scott Geraedts, Zlatko Papi´ c, and Edward H. Rezayi. Evidence for a topologi- cal “exciton fermi sea” in bilayer graphene. Physical Review B, 98(4), July 2018. ISSN 2469-9969. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.98.045113. URL http://dx.doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.045113

    2018 doi

  45. [59]

    J. I. A. Li, C. Tan, S. Chen, Y. Zeng, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Hone, and C. R. Dean. Even denominator fractional quantum Hall states in bilayer graphene. Science, 2017. ISSN 0036-8075. doi:10.1126/science.aao2521. URL http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/ 2017/10/...

    2017 doi

  46. [60]

    Glenn Wagner and Dung X. Nguyen. Successive electron-vortex binding in quantum hall bilayers at ν = 1 4 + 3

  47. [61]

    Single- parameter variational wave functions for quantum hall bilayers

    Qi Hu, Titus Neupert, and Glenn Wagner. Single- parameter variational wave functions for quantum hall bilayers. Phys. Rev. B, 109:155138, Apr 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.155138. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.155138

    2024 doi

  48. [62]

    J. I. A. Li, Q. Shi, Y. Zeng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Hone, and C. R. Dean. Pairing states of com- posite fermions in double-layer graphene. Nature Physics, 15(9):898–903, 2019. ISSN 1745-2481. doi: 10.1038/s41567-019-0547-z. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41567-019-0547-z

    2019 doi

  49. [63]

    Jain and Michael R

    Jainendra K. Jain and Michael R. Peterson. Re- constructing the electron in a fractionalized quantum fluid. Phys. Rev. Lett., 94:186808, May 2005. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.186808. URL http://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.186808

    2005 doi

  50. [64]

    Mytraya Gattu, G. J. Sreejith, and J. K. Jain. 8 Scanning tunneling microscopy of fractional quantum hall states: Spectroscopy of composite-fermion bound states. Phys. Rev. B, 109:L201123, May 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.109.L201123. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysR...

    2024 doi

  51. [65]

    Balram, Yuwen Hu, Yen-Chen Tsui, Minhao He, Nicolas Regnault, Michael P

    Songyang Pu, Ajit C. Balram, Yuwen Hu, Yen-Chen Tsui, Minhao He, Nicolas Regnault, Michael P. Zaletel, Ali Yazdani, and Zlatko Papi´ c. Fingerprints of com- posite fermion lambda levels in scanning tunneling mi- croscopy. Physical Review B, 110(8), August 2024. ISSN 2469-9969....

    2024 doi

  52. [66]

    Electronic exci- tations in the bulk of fractional quantum hall states

    Xinlei Yue and Ady Stern. Electronic exci- tations in the bulk of fractional quantum hall states. Phys. Rev. B, 110:115428, Sep 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.115428. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.115428

    2024 doi

  53. [67]

    Rodr´ ıguez, Steven H

    Iv´ an D. Rodr´ ıguez, Steven H. Simon, and J. K. Slingerland. Evaluation of ranks of real space and particle entanglement spectra for large sys- tems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:256806, Jun 2012. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.256806. URL http://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett...

    2012 doi

  54. [68]

    Davenport, Iv´ an D

    Simon C. Davenport, Iv´ an D. Rodr´ ıguez, J. K. Slinger- land, and Steven H. Simon. Composite fermion model for entanglement spectrum of fractional quantum Hall states. Phys. Rev. B, 92:115155, Sep 2015. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115155. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/P...

    2015 doi

  55. [69]

    Junping Shao, Eun-Ah Kim, F. D. M. Haldane, and Edward H. Rezayi. Entanglement entropy of the ν = 1 /2 composite fermion non-Fermi liquid state. Phys. Rev. Lett., 114:206402, May 2015. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.206402. URL http://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.206402

    2015 doi

  56. [70]

    E. T. Newman and R. Penrose. Note on the bondi-metzner-sachs group. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 7(5):863–870, May 1966. ISSN 1089-7658. doi:10.1063/1.1931221. URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1063/1.1931221

    1966 doi

  57. [71]

    Phys. Rev. B, 110:195106, Nov 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.110.195106. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.195106

    2024 doi

  58. [72]

    How should spin-weighted spheri- cal functions be defined? Journal of Mathematical Physics, 57(9), September 2016

    Michael Boyle. How should spin-weighted spheri- cal functions be defined? Journal of Mathematical Physics, 57(9), September 2016. ISSN 1089-7658. doi:10.1063/1.4962723. URL http://dx.doi.org/10. 1063/1.4962723

    2016 doi

  59. [73]

    High-resolution tunneling spec- troscopy of fractional quantum hall states

    Yuwen Hu, Yen-Chen Tsui, Minhao He, Umut Kam- ber, Taige Wang, Amir S Mohammadi, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Zlatko Papic, Michael P Zale- tel, and Ali Yazdani. High-resolution tunneling spec- troscopy of fractional quantum hall states. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.05789, 2023

    2023

  60. [75]

    The relationship between monopole har- monics and spin-weighted spherical harmonics

    Tevian Dray. The relationship between monopole har- monics and spin-weighted spherical harmonics. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 26(5):1030–1033, May 1985. ISSN 1089-7658. doi:10.1063/1.526533. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.526533

    1985 doi

  61. [76]

    F. D. M. Haldane. Fractional quantization of the Hall effect: A hierarchy of incompressible quantum fluid states. Phys. Rev. Lett., 51:605–608, Aug 1983. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.605. URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.605

    1983 doi

  62. [77]

    Maciejko, B

    J. Maciejko, B. Hsu, S. A. Kivelson, YeJe Park, and S. L. Sondhi. Field theory of the quantum hall nematic transition. Physical Review B, 88(12), September 2013. ISSN 1550-235X. doi:10.1103/physrevb.88.125137. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.125137

    2013 doi

  63. [78]

    Fractional quantum hall systems near nematic- ity: Bimetric theory, composite fermions, and dirac brackets

    Dung Xuan Nguyen, Andrey Gromov, and Dam Thanh Son. Fractional quantum hall systems near nematic- ity: Bimetric theory, composite fermions, and dirac brackets. Phys. Rev. B, 97:195103, May 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.195103. URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.195103

    2018 doi

  64. [79]

    Microscopic theory for nematic frac- tional quantum hall effect

    Bo Yang. Microscopic theory for nematic frac- tional quantum hall effect. Physical Review Research, 2(3), September 2020. ISSN 2643-1564. doi: 10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033362. URL http://dx. doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033362

    2020 doi

  65. [80]

    The- ory of nematic fractional quantum hall states

    Yizhi You, Gil Young Cho, and Eduardo Fradkin. The- ory of nematic fractional quantum hall states. Physical Review X, 4(4), December 2014. ISSN 2160-3308. doi: 10.1103/physrevx.4.041050. URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.041050

    2014 doi

  66. [81]

    Balram, Joseph Taylor, Ed- uardo Fradkin, and Zlatko Papi´ c

    Songyang Pu, Ajit C. Balram, Joseph Taylor, Ed- uardo Fradkin, and Zlatko Papi´ c. Microscopic model for fractional quantum hall nematics. Physical Review Letters, 132(23), June 2024. ISSN 1079-7114. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.132.236503. URL http://dx.doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLe...

    2024 doi

  67. [82]

    Kip S. Thorne. Multipole expansions of gravita- tional radiation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 52 (2):299–339, April 1980. ISSN 0034-6861. doi: 10.1103/revmodphys.52.299. URL http://dx.doi. org/10.1103/RevModPhys.52.299

    1980 doi

  68. [83]

    Yoon Jang Chung, D. Graf, L. W. Engel, K. A. Ville- gas Rosales, P. T. Madathil, K. W. Baldwin, K. W. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, and M. Shayegan. Correlated states of 2D electrons near the Landau level filling ν = 1/7. Phys. Rev. Lett., 128:026802, Jan 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLet...

    2022 doi

  69. [86]

    Supplemental Materials section includes discussion of how the monopole harmonics transform under rotation, derivation of Jain-Kamilla projection in the quaternion formulation, and the particle number dependence of the magneto-roton dispersion

  70. [88]

    Rizwana Rehman and Ilse C. F. Ipsen. Computing char- 9 acteristic polynomials from eigenvalues. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 32(1):90–114, January 2011. ISSN 1095-7162. doi:10.1137/100788392. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/100788392

    2011 doi

  71. [90]

    S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald, and P. M. Platzman. Collective-excitation gap in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett., 54:581–583, Feb 1985. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.581. URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.581

    1985 doi

  72. [91]

    Balram, G

    Ajit C. Balram, G. J. Sreejith, and J. K. Jain. Splitting of the girvin-macdonald-platzman density wave and the nature of chiral gravitons in the fractional quantum hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett., 133:246605, Dec 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.246605. URL https://link. aps....

    2024 doi

  73. [92]

    Simon and Bertrand I

    Steven H. Simon and Bertrand I. Halperin. Finite-wave- vector electromagnetic response of fractional quantized Hall states. Phys. Rev. B, 48:17368–17387, Dec 1993. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.48.17368. URL http://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.17368

    1993 doi

  74. [93]

    Yoon Jang Chung, K. A. Villegas Rosales, K. W. Bald- win, P. T. Madathil, K. W. West, M. Shayegan, and L. N. Pfeiffer. Ultra-high-quality two-dimensional elec- tron systems. Nature Materials, Feb 2021. ISSN 1476-

    2021

  75. [94]

    Park and J

    K. Park and J. K. Jain. Two-roton bound state in the fractional quantum Hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84:5576–5579, Jun 2000. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5576. URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5576

    doi

  76. [95]

    Positions of the mag- netoroton minima in the fractional quantum hall effect

    Ajit C Balram and Songyang Pu. Positions of the mag- netoroton minima in the fractional quantum hall effect. The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 90(6):124, 2017

    2017

  77. [97]

    Feiguin, Gunnar M¨ oller, and J

    Parsa Bonderson, Adrian E. Feiguin, Gunnar M¨ oller, and J. K. Slingerland. Competing topological orders in the ν = 12 /5 quantum Hall state. Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:036806, Jan 2012. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.036806. URL http://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.036806

    2012 doi

  78. [98]

    G. J. Sreejith, Ying-Hai Wu, A. W´ ojs, and J. K. Jain. Tripartite composite fermion states. Phys. Rev. B, 87: 245125, Jun 2013. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.87.245125. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 87.245125

    2013 doi

  79. [99]

    Andrei Bernevig, and Nicolas Regnault

    C´ ecile Repellin, Titus Neupert, B. Andrei Bernevig, and Nicolas Regnault. Projective construction of the 𭟋k Read-Rezayi fractional quantum Hall states and their excitations on the torus geometry. Phys. Rev. B, 92: 115128, Sep 2015. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115128. URL https:/...

    2015 doi

  80. [100]

    Emergence of jack ground states from two-body pseudopotentials in fractional quantum Hall systems

    Bartosz Ku´ smierz and Arkadiusz W´ ojs. Emergence of jack ground states from two-body pseudopotentials in fractional quantum Hall systems. Phys. Rev. B, 97: 245125, Jun 2018. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.245125. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB. 97.245125

    2018 doi

  81. [101]

    Transitions from abelian composite fermion to non-abelian parton fractional quantum hall states in the zeroth landau level of bilayer graphene

    Ajit C Balram. Transitions from abelian composite fermion to non-abelian parton fractional quantum hall states in the zeroth landau level of bilayer graphene. Physical Review B, 105(12):L121406, 2022

    2022

  82. [102]

    Unlocking new regimes in fractional quantum Hall effect with quaternions

    Simon Danisch and Julius Krumbiegel. Makie.jl: Flexible high-performance data visualization for julia. Journal of Open Source Software, 6(65):3349, Septem- ber 2021. ISSN 2475-9066. doi:10.21105/joss.03349. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.21105/joss.03349. Supplementary Material for ...

    2021 arXiv

  83. [105]

    Roberts, and Dam Thanh Son

    Siavash Golkar, Dung Xuan Nguyen, Matthew M. Roberts, and Dam Thanh Son. Higher-spin theory of the magnetorotons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:216403, Nov 2016. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.216403. URL http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 117.216403

    2016 doi

  84. [108]

    Read and E

    N. Read and E. Rezayi. Beyond paired quantum Hall states: Parafermions and incompressible states in the first excited Landau level. Phys. Rev. B, 59:8084–8092, Mar 1999. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.59.8084. URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.8084

    1999 doi

  85. [115]

    states and their lowest energy charged and neutral ex- citations (the latter are also referred to as the magneto- roton modes) in the spherical geometry. To explore the possibility of a magneto-roton instability of the FQHE along the sequence ν = n/(2n + 1) for large n, we hav...

  86. [116]

    Dirac monopole without strings: Monopole harmonics

    Tai Tsun Wu and Chen Ning Yang. Dirac monopole without strings: Monopole harmonics. Nuclear Physics B, 107(3):365–380, May 1976. ISSN 0550-3213. doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(76)90143-7. URL http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/0550-3213(76)90143-7

    1976 doi

  87. [117]

    Some proper- ties of monopole harmonics

    Tai Tsun Wu and Chen Ning Yang. Some proper- ties of monopole harmonics. Physical Review D, 16 (4):1018–1021, August 1977. ISSN 0556-2821. doi: 10.1103/physrevd.16.1018. URL http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevD.16.1018

    1977 doi

  88. [118]

    J. K. Jain. Composite Fermions. Cambridge University Press, New York, US, 2007

    2007

  89. [119]

    Gruppentheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Quantenmechanik der Atomspektren

    Eugen Wigner. Gruppentheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Quantenmechanik der Atomspektren. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, 1931. ISBN 9783663025559. doi:10.1007/978-3-663-02555-9. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-02555-9

    1931 doi

  90. [120]

    J. J. Sakurai and Jim Napolitano. Modern Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press, September

  91. [122]

    W´ ojs, and J

    Yuhe Zhang, A. W´ ojs, and J. K. Jain. Landau-level mix- ing and particle-hole symmetry breaking for spin tran- sitions in the fractional quantum hall effect. Physical Review Letters, 117(11), September 2016. ISSN 1079-

    2016

  92. [123]

    URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.116803

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.116803. URL http: //dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.116803

    doi

  93. [124]

    Jianyun Zhao, Yuhe Zhang, and J. K. Jain. Crys- tallization in the fractional quantum hall regime in- duced by landau-level mixing. Physical Review Letters, 121(11), September 2018. ISSN 1079-7114. doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.121.116802. URL http://dx.doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett...

    2018 doi

  94. [125]

    J. K. Jain and R. K. Kamilla. Composite fermions in the Hilbert space of the lowest electronic Landau level. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 11(22):2621–2660, 1997. doi: 10.1142/S0217979297001301

    1997 doi

  95. [126]

    Davenport and Steven H

    Simon C. Davenport and Steven H. Simon. Spinful composite fermions in a negative effec- tive field. Phys. Rev. B, 85:245303, Jun 2012. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.245303. URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.245303

    2012 doi

  96. [127]

    URL https: //github.com/JuliaMath/DoubleFloats.jl

    DoubleFloats.jl: math with more good bits. URL https: //github.com/JuliaMath/DoubleFloats.jl

  97. [128]

    Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials

    Ian Grant Macdonald. Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979

    1979

  98. [129]

    X. M. Feng, P. Wang, W. Yang, and G. R. Jin. High- precision evaluation of wigner’s d matrix by exact diag- onalization. Phys. Rev. E, 92:043307, Oct 2015. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.92.043307. URL https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.043307

    2015 doi

  99. [130]

    Mandal and Jainendra K

    Sudhansu S. Mandal and Jainendra K. Jain. Theoreti- cal search for the nested quantum Hall effect of compos- ite fermions. Phys. Rev. B, 66:155302, Oct 2002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.155302. URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.155302

    2002 doi

  100. [131]

    Harville

    David A. Harville. Matrix Algebra From a Statistician’s Perspective. Springer New York, 1997. ISBN 9780387226774. doi:10.1007/b98818. URL http://dx. doi.org/10.1007/b98818

    1997 doi

  101. [132]

    Balram, Arkadiusz W´ ojs, and Jainendra K

    Ajit C. Balram, Arkadiusz W´ ojs, and Jainendra K. Jain. State counting for excited bands of the frac- tional quantum Hall effect: Exclusion rules for bound excitons. Phys. Rev. B, 88:205312, Nov 2013. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.205312. URL http://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysR...

    2013 doi

  102. [133]

    Ramachandran and Chris P

    Kandethody M. Ramachandran and Chris P. Tsokos. Bayesian estimation and inference, page 415–459. Else- vier, 2021. ISBN 9780128178157. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12- 817815-7.00010-5. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ B978-0-12-817815-7.00010-5

    2021 doi

  103. [134]

    R. Morf, N. d’Ambrumenil, and B. I. Halperin. Micro- scopic wave functions for the fractional quantized Hall states at ν = 2 5and 2

  104. [135]

    Phys. Rev. B, 34:3037–3040, Aug 1986. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.34.3037. URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.34.3037

    1986 doi

  105. [1994]

    URL http:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.900

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.900. URL http:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.900

    doi

  106. [1999]

    URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3665

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3665. URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.3665

    doi

  107. [2001]

    URL http:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.085313

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.64.085313. URL http:// link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.64.085313

    doi

  108. [2009]

    URL http://www

    doi:10.1126/science.1171472. URL http://www. sciencemag.org/content/324/5930/1044.abstract

    doi

  109. [2012]

    URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.245307

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.85.245307. URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.245307

    doi

  110. [2015]

    URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.201101

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.201101. URL http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.201101

    doi

  111. [2019]

    doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0546-0

    ISSN 1745-2481. doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0546-0. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0546-0

    doi

  112. [2020]

    doi:10.1017/9781108587280

    ISBN 9781108473224. doi:10.1017/9781108587280. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108587280

    doi

  113. [2024]

    URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.035306

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.035306. URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.035306

    doi

  114. [4660]

    URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-00942-3

    doi:10.1038/s41563-021-00942-3. URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-00942-3

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.