Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Phases of learning dynamics in artificial neural networks: with or without mislabeled data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.06509 v1 pith:JJMML5RE submitted 2021-01-16 cs.LG cond-mat.stat-mechphysics.data-an

classification cs.LGcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.data-an
keywords phaseduringlearningsamplesdynamicsmislabeledcharacterizefinds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Despite tremendous success of deep neural network in machine learning, the underlying reason for its superior learning capability remains unclear. Here, we present a framework based on statistical physics to study dynamics of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) that drives learning in neural networks. By using the minibatch gradient ensemble, we construct order parameters to characterize dynamics of weight updates in SGD. Without mislabeled data, we find that the SGD learning dynamics transitions from a fast learning phase to a slow exploration phase, which is associated with large changes in order parameters that characterize the alignment of SGD gradients and their mean amplitude. In the case with randomly mislabeled samples, SGD learning dynamics falls into four distinct phases. The system first finds solutions for the correctly labeled samples in phase I, it then wanders around these solutions in phase II until it finds a direction to learn the mislabeled samples during phase III, after which it finds solutions that satisfy all training samples during phase IV. Correspondingly, the test error decreases during phase I and remains low during phase II; however, it increases during phase III and reaches a high plateau during phase IV. The transitions between different phases can be understood by changes of order parameters that characterize the alignment of mean gradients for the correctly and incorrectly labeled samples and their (relative) strength during learning. We find that individual sample losses for the two datasets are most separated during phase II, which leads to a cleaning process to eliminate mislabeled samples for improving generalization.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. On the Reasoning Capacity of AI Models and How to Quantify It

    cs.AI 2025-01 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Positional randomization on GPQA shows GPT-4o-mini's accuracy is inflated by position-dependent heuristics, but the paper's strategy-decomposition model is validated only by construction and contradicts its own accuracy data.

Pith tools