Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Demystifying Practices, Challenges and Expected Features of Using GitHub Copilot

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2309.05687 v1 pith:JJTY7UTY submitted 2023-09-11 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords copilotcodegithubusedpractitionerswhenbeenchallenges
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the advances in machine learning, there is a growing interest in AI-enabled tools for autocompleting source code. GitHub Copilot has been trained on billions of lines of open source GitHub code, and is one of such tools that has been increasingly used since its launch in June 2021. However, little effort has been devoted to understanding the practices, challenges, and expected features of using Copilot in programming for auto-completed source code from the point of view of practitioners. To this end, we conducted an empirical study by collecting and analyzing the data from Stack Overflow (SO) and GitHub Discussions. We searched and manually collected 303 SO posts and 927 GitHub discussions related to the usage of Copilot. We identified the programming languages, Integrated Development Environments (IDEs), technologies used with Copilot, functions implemented, benefits, limitations, and challenges when using Copilot. The results show that when practitioners use Copilot: (1) The major programming languages used with Copilot are JavaScript and Python, (2) the main IDE used with Copilot is Visual Studio Code, (3) the most common used technology with Copilot is Node.js, (4) the leading function implemented by Copilot is data processing, (5) the main purpose of users using Copilot is to help generate code, (6) the significant benefit of using Copilot is useful code generation, (7) the main limitation encountered by practitioners when using Copilot is difficulty of integration, and (8) the most common expected feature is that Copilot can be integrated with more IDEs. Our results suggest that using Copilot is like a double-edged sword, which requires developers to carefully consider various aspects when deciding whether or not to use it. Our study provides empirically grounded foundations that could inform developers and practitioners, as well as provide a basis for future investigations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Impact of Generative AI on Code Expertise Models: An Exploratory Study

    cs.SE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simulating the attribution of a mean 39% of added lines to GenAI changes Degree of Expertise values slightly and alters Truck Factor values or rankings in 73% of computed scenarios.

  2. CompilerGPT: Leveraging Large Language Models for Analyzing and Acting on Compiler Optimization Reports

    cs.PL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An open-source framework in which GPT-4o or Claude reads Clang/GCC optimization reports and iteratively rewrites C++ code, achieving up to 6.5x speedups on some benchmarks but not consistently.

Pith tools