REVIEW 1 cited by
Assessing Dialogue Systems with Distribution Distances
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
An important aspect of developing dialogue systems is how to evaluate and compare the performance of different systems. Existing automatic evaluation metrics are based on turn-level quality evaluation and use average scores for system-level comparison. In this paper, we propose to measure the performance of a dialogue system by computing the distribution-wise distance between its generated conversations and real-world conversations. Specifically, two distribution-wise metrics, FBD and PRD, are developed and evaluated. Experiments on several dialogue corpora show that our proposed metrics correlate better with human judgments than existing metrics.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Unifying Information-theoretic Perspective on Evaluating Generative Models
A new information-theoretic evaluation metric (PCE, RCE, RE) is proposed to separately detect fidelity loss, mode dropping, and mode shrinkage in generative models, and existing kNN precision/recall metrics are unifie...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.