pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28172 · v1 · pith:JQGX4ACXnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Searching for primordial features with radio surveys: synergy between the power spectrum and bispectrum

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 02:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords primordial featuresbispectrumpower spectrumHI intensity mappingCMBinflationforecastingnon-Gaussian covariance
0
0 comments X

The pith

The bispectrum from future HI intensity mapping surveys improves constraints on primordial feature amplitudes by 30-40% over the power spectrum alone when combined with CMB data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper sets out a forecasting framework to test how well next-generation radio surveys can detect oscillatory signals from the early universe. It demonstrates that adding the bispectrum to the power spectrum analysis tightens marginalised constraints by 30-40 percent, breaks degeneracies, and in some cases supplies more information than the power spectrum. Much of the added power comes from late-time gravitational contributions that carry forward the primordial oscillation pattern. When the HI data are combined with CMB measurements, the joint probe reaches percent-level precision on the frequency of these features, directly probing non-slow-roll inflation.

Core claim

The central claim is that a joint analysis of the redshift-space power spectrum and bispectrum from SKAO and HIRAX-style HI intensity mapping surveys, together with CMB data and including scale-dependent bias, redshift-space distortions and non-Gaussian covariance, improves marginalised constraints on the amplitudes of linear, logarithmic and sharp-feature primordial oscillations by 30-40 percent relative to the power spectrum alone, with the bispectrum sometimes containing more information than the power spectrum and the combined probe delivering percent-level precision on feature frequency.

What carries the argument

The joint redshift-space power spectrum plus bispectrum likelihood that incorporates phenomenological templates for linear, logarithmic and sharp-feature primordial oscillations, scale-dependent bias, redshift-space distortions and non-Gaussian covariance.

Load-bearing premise

The forecasting assumes that the chosen phenomenological templates accurately represent possible primordial features and that the modeled scale-dependent bias, redshift-space distortions and non-Gaussian covariance fully capture the relevant physics without unaccounted systematics.

What would settle it

Measurements from SKAO or HIRAX that show the bispectrum contributing less than 20 percent improvement to marginalised constraints on feature amplitudes, or that fail to reach percent-level precision on feature frequency when combined with CMB data, would falsify the forecasted gains.

read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive forecasting framework to assess the detection of primordial oscillatory features by exploiting the synergy between future neutral hydrogen (HI) intensity mapping (IM) surveys and cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurements. Focusing on next-generation single-dish (SKAO) and interferometric (HIRAX) radio configurations, we perform a joint analysis of the redshift-space power spectrum and bispectrum, consistently incorporating scale-dependent bias, redshift-space distortions, and non-Gaussian covariance. We investigate phenomenological templates with linear and logarithmic primordial oscillations, together with a physically motivated sharp-feature model. We find that including the large-scale structure bispectrum improves marginalised constraints on feature amplitudes by $30$--$40\%$ relative to the power spectrum alone and helps break parameter degeneracies. In several cases, the bispectrum contains more information on the power-spectrum feature parameters than the power spectrum itself. Much of this gain arises from the late-time gravitational contribution, which inherits the oscillatory structure of the primordial feature signal and acts as an independent source of information. While the CMB angular power spectrum is crucial for constraining low oscillation frequencies, joint interferometric IM analyses ($P+B$) outperform CMB amplitude constraints by up to $75\%$ in the linear regime. We also show that, despite non-Gaussian covariance degrading the independent constraining power of the bispectrum by $55$--$90\%$, the combined HI+CMB probe achieves percent-level precision on the frequency of primordial features, providing a powerful test of non-slow-roll inflation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a forecasting study of constraints on primordial oscillatory features (linear, logarithmic, and sharp-feature templates) from future HI intensity mapping surveys (SKAO single-dish and HIRAX interferometric) combined with CMB data. It performs a joint Fisher-matrix analysis of the redshift-space power spectrum and bispectrum, incorporating scale-dependent bias, redshift-space distortions, and non-Gaussian covariance, and reports that the bispectrum improves marginalized constraints on feature amplitudes by 30-40%, breaks degeneracies, and enables percent-level precision on oscillation frequencies when combined with CMB.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold, the results indicate that bispectrum measurements from next-generation radio surveys can provide substantial complementary information to the power spectrum for testing non-slow-roll inflation, with the late-time gravitational contributions acting as an additional signal channel. The explicit inclusion of non-Gaussian covariance in the joint analysis is a methodological strength that makes the forecasts more realistic than many prior power-spectrum-only studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / joint P+B covariance modeling] Abstract and the joint-analysis section: the headline 30-40% improvement and the claim that 'in several cases the bispectrum contains more information on the power-spectrum feature parameters than the power spectrum itself' rest on the assumption that the scale-dependent bias and RSD terms transmit the exact oscillatory structure of the primordial templates into the late-time bispectrum without significant additional damping or mode-coupling. This modeling choice is load-bearing for the reported information gain and degeneracy breaking; an explicit validation (e.g., against higher-order perturbation theory or simulations at the relevant k and z) is needed to confirm the inheritance is accurate.
  2. [Covariance and Fisher-matrix implementation] The non-Gaussian covariance degradation of 55-90% is quoted, yet the combined probe still achieves the stated gains. Because the off-diagonal correlations directly affect the marginalization over feature amplitudes and frequencies, the paper should demonstrate that the covariance matrix construction (including the specific template choices) does not underestimate correlations at the oscillation frequencies where the bispectrum is claimed to outperform the power spectrum.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Template definitions] The distinction between the linear, logarithmic, and sharp-feature templates should be summarized with explicit functional forms early in the methods section to aid readability.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the constraint contours should explicitly state whether the plotted ellipses include or exclude the CMB contribution so that the HI-only vs. joint gains are immediately clear.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive report. The comments raise important points regarding modeling assumptions and covariance validation. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract / joint P+B covariance modeling] Abstract and the joint-analysis section: the headline 30-40% improvement and the claim that 'in several cases the bispectrum contains more information on the power-spectrum feature parameters than the power spectrum itself' rest on the assumption that the scale-dependent bias and RSD terms transmit the exact oscillatory structure of the primordial templates into the late-time bispectrum without significant additional damping or mode-coupling. This modeling choice is load-bearing for the reported information gain and degeneracy breaking; an explicit validation (e.g., against higher-order perturbation theory or simulations at the relevant k and z) is needed to confirm the inheritance is accurate.

    Authors: We agree that the transmission of oscillatory features through bias and RSD is a central modeling assumption. Our analysis employs the standard tree-level redshift-space bispectrum expressions, which by construction propagate the primordial templates. We have revised the manuscript by adding a dedicated paragraph in the methods section discussing the validity range of this approximation at the relevant scales (k < 0.2 h/Mpc) and redshifts, supported by references to higher-order perturbation theory studies. We have also moderated the abstract claim to 'the bispectrum provides complementary information' rather than 'contains more information'. Full N-body validation for these specific templates lies beyond the scope of the current forecasting work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Covariance and Fisher-matrix implementation] The non-Gaussian covariance degradation of 55-90% is quoted, yet the combined probe still achieves the stated gains. Because the off-diagonal correlations directly affect the marginalization over feature amplitudes and frequencies, the paper should demonstrate that the covariance matrix construction (including the specific template choices) does not underestimate correlations at the oscillation frequencies where the bispectrum is claimed to outperform the power spectrum.

    Authors: We have addressed this by adding new figures in the appendix that display the correlation matrix elements evaluated specifically at the oscillation frequencies of the linear and logarithmic templates. These confirm that off-diagonal correlations are fully incorporated in the covariance construction. The quoted degradation factors and the resulting joint constraints are obtained from the complete matrix inversion, and the gains remain robust. We have also clarified the covariance formula implementation in Section 4 to make the template dependence explicit. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Full validation of the bispectrum modeling against N-body simulations for the oscillatory feature templates at the relevant k and z.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: forecasting gains follow from standard perturbation theory applied to independent templates

full rationale

The paper's central results (30-40% improvement from adding bispectrum, degeneracy breaking, percent-level frequency precision) are obtained by propagating phenomenological templates (linear, logarithmic, sharp-feature) through the standard redshift-space power spectrum and bispectrum expressions that include scale-dependent bias and RSD. These expressions are not defined in terms of the final constraints; the numerical Fisher forecasts are external to the template definitions and do not reduce the reported information gain to a fitted parameter by construction. No self-citation is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or load-bearing premise for the templates themselves. The modeling assumptions are stated explicitly and remain falsifiable against external data or higher-order simulations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central forecasting claim rests on standard cosmological assumptions and phenomenological templates whose parameters are the quantities being constrained rather than ad-hoc additions.

free parameters (2)
  • primordial feature amplitude
    Amplitude parameters of the oscillatory templates are the target quantities being forecasted; they are not fitted to existing data within the paper.
  • oscillation frequency
    Frequency parameters of the linear, logarithmic, and sharp-feature templates are constrained quantities.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Standard Lambda-CDM background and linear perturbation theory hold for the late-time evolution
    Invoked when incorporating scale-dependent bias, redshift-space distortions, and the late-time gravitational contribution that inherits the primordial oscillatory structure.
  • domain assumption The chosen phenomenological templates (linear, logarithmic, sharp-feature) adequately represent possible deviations from slow-roll inflation
    Used to generate the signals whose detectability is forecasted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5813 in / 1636 out tokens · 56956 ms · 2026-06-29T02:46:47.461343+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

180 extracted references · 120 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration: N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, A&A641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

  2. [2]

    Akrami, F

    Planck Collaboration: Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al.,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation, A&A641(2020) A10 [1807.06211]

  3. [3]

    Akrami, F

    Planck Collaboration: Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al.,Planck 2018 results. IX. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, A&A641(2020) A9 [1905.05697]

  4. [4]

    Starobinsky,A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,Physics Letters B91(1980) 99

    A.A. Starobinsky,A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity,Physics Letters B91(1980) 99

  5. [5]

    Guth,Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Phys

    A.H. Guth,Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

  6. [6]

    Linde,A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,Physics Letters B108(1982) 389

    A.D. Linde,A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems,Physics Letters B108(1982) 389

  7. [7]

    Mukhanov and G.V

    V.F. Mukhanov and G.V. Chibisov,Quantum fluctuations and a nonsingular universe,Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters33(1981) 532

  8. [8]

    Chluba, J

    J. Chluba, J. Hamann and S.P. Patil,Features and new physical scales in primordial observables: Theory and observation,International Journal of Modern Physics D24(2015) 1530023 [1505.01834]

  9. [9]

    Achúcarro, M

    A. Achúcarro, M. Biagetti, M. Braglia, G. Cabass, R. Caldwell, E. Castorina et al.,Inflation: Theory and Observations,arXiv e-prints(2022) arXiv:2203.08128 [2203.08128]

  10. [10]

    Adams, B

    J.A. Adams, B. Cresswell and R. Easther,Inflationary perturbations from a potential with a step,Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 123514 [astro-ph/0102236]

  11. [11]

    Peiris, E

    H.V. Peiris, E. Komatsu, L. Verde, D.N. Spergel, C.L. Bennett, M. Halpern et al.,First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Implications For Inflation, ApJS148(2003) 213 [astro-ph/0302225]

  12. [12]

    Mukherjee and Y

    P. Mukherjee and Y. Wang,Model-independent Reconstruction of the Primordial Power Spectrum from Wilkinson Microwave Anistropy Probe Data,ApJ599(2003) 1 [astro-ph/0303211]

  13. [13]

    Martin and C

    J. Martin and C. Ringeval,Superimposed oscillations in the WMAP data?,Phys. Rev. D69 (2004) 083515 [astro-ph/0310382]

  14. [14]

    L. Covi, J. Hamann, A. Melchiorri, A. Slosar and I. Sorbera,Inflation and WMAP three year data: Features are still present,Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 083509 [astro-ph/0606452]

  15. [15]

    Hamann, L

    J. Hamann, L. Covi, A. Melchiorri and A. Slosar,New constraints on oscillations in the primordial spectrum of inflationary perturbations,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 023503 [astro-ph/0701380]. – 23 –

  16. [16]

    Meerburg, R.A.M.J

    P.D. Meerburg, R.A.M.J. Wijers and J.P. van der Schaar,WMAP7 constraints on oscillations in the primordial power spectrum,MNRAS421(2012) 369 [1109.5264]

  17. [17]

    Flauger, L

    R. Flauger, L. McAllister, E. Pajer, A. Westphal and G. Xu,Oscillations in the CMB from axion monodromy inflation,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2010(2010) 009 [0907.2916]

  18. [18]

    Aich, D.K

    M. Aich, D.K. Hazra, L. Sriramkumar and T. Souradeep,Oscillations in the inflaton potential: Complete numerical treatment and comparison with the recent and forthcoming CMB datasets, Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 083526 [1106.2798]

  19. [19]

    Chen and C

    X. Chen and C. Ringeval,Searching for standard clocks in the primordial universe,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2012(2012) 014 [1205.6085]

  20. [20]

    Peiris, R

    H.V. Peiris, R. Easther and R. Flauger,Constraining monodromy inflation,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2013(2013) 018 [1303.2616]

  21. [21]

    Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela et al.,Planck 2013 results. XXII. Constraints on inflation, A&A571(2014) A22 [1303.5082]

  22. [22]

    Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio-Barandela et al.,Planck 2013 results. XXIV. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, A&A571(2014) A24 [1303.5084]

  23. [23]

    Meerburg, D.N

    P.D. Meerburg, D.N. Spergel and B.D. Wandelt,Searching for oscillations in the primordial power spectrum. II. Constraints from Planck data,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 063537 [1308.3705]

  24. [24]

    Benetti,Updating constraints on inflationary features in the primordial power spectrum with the Planck data,Phys

    M. Benetti,Updating constraints on inflationary features in the primordial power spectrum with the Planck data,Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 087302 [1308.6406]

  25. [25]

    Miranda and W

    V. Miranda and W. Hu,Inflationary steps in the Planck data,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 083529 [1312.0946]

  26. [26]

    Easther and R

    R. Easther and R. Flauger,Planck constraints on monodromy inflation,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2014(2014) 037 [1308.3736]

  27. [27]

    Chen and M.H

    X. Chen and M.H. Namjoo,Standard Clock in primordial density perturbations and cosmic microwave background,Physics Letters B739(2014) 285 [1404.1536]

  28. [28]

    Achúcarro, V

    A. Achúcarro, V. Atal, B. Hu, P. Ortiz and J. Torrado,Inflation with moderately sharp features in the speed of sound: Generalized slow roll and in-in formalism for power spectrum and bispectrum,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 023511 [1404.7522]

  29. [29]

    Hazra, A

    D.K. Hazra, A. Shafieloo, G.F. Smoot and A.A. Starobinsky,Wiggly whipped inflation, Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2014(2014) 048 [1405.2012]

  30. [30]

    Hazra, A

    D.K. Hazra, A. Shafieloo and T. Souradeep,Primordial power spectrum from Planck,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2014(2014) 011 [1406.4827]

  31. [31]

    Hu and J

    B. Hu and J. Torrado,Searching for primordial localized features with CMB and LSS spectra, Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 064039 [1410.4804]

  32. [32]

    Fergusson, H.F

    J.R. Fergusson, H.F. Gruetjen, E.P.S. Shellard and B. Wallisch,Polyspectra searches for sharp oscillatory features in cosmic microwave sky data,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 123506 [1412.6152]

  33. [33]

    Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont et al.,Planck 2015 results. XVII. Constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity, A&A 594(2016) A17 [1502.01592]

  34. [34]

    Planck Collaboration: P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M. Arnaud, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont et al.,Planck 2015 results. XX. Constraints on inflation, A&A594(2016) A20 [1502.02114]. – 24 –

  35. [35]

    Gruppuso, N

    A. Gruppuso, N. Kitazawa, N. Mandolesi, P. Natoli and A. Sagnotti,Pre-inflationary relics in the CMB?,Physics of the Dark Universe11(2016) 68 [1508.00411]

  36. [36]

    Hazra, A

    D.K. Hazra, A. Shafieloo, G.F. Smoot and A.A. Starobinsky,Primordial features and Planck polarization,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2016(2016) 009 [1605.02106]

  37. [37]

    Torrado, B

    J. Torrado, B. Hu and A. Achúcarro,Robust predictions for an oscillatory bispectrum in Planck 2015 data from transient reductions in the speed of sound of the inflaton,Phys. Rev. D 96(2017) 083515 [1611.10350]

  38. [38]

    Handley, A.N

    W.J. Handley, A.N. Lasenby, H.V. Peiris and M.P. Hobson,Bayesian inflationary reconstructions from Planck 2018 data,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 103511 [1908.00906]

  39. [39]

    Zeng, E.D

    C. Zeng, E.D. Kovetz, X. Chen, Y. Gong, J.B. Muñoz and M. Kamionkowski,Searching for oscillations in the primordial power spectrum with CMB and LSS data,Phys. Rev. D99 (2019) 043517 [1812.05105]

  40. [40]

    Cañas-Herrera, J

    G. Cañas-Herrera, J. Torrado and A. Achúcarro,Bayesian reconstruction of the inflaton’s speed of sound using CMB data,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 123531 [2012.04640]

  41. [41]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen and D.K. Hazra,Comparing multi-field primordial feature models with the Planck data,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2021(2021) 005 [2103.03025]

  42. [42]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen and D.K. Hazra,Uncovering the history of cosmic inflation from anomalies in cosmic microwave background spectra,European Physical Journal C82(2022) 498 [2106.07546]

  43. [43]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen and D.K. Hazra,Primordial standard clock models and CMB residual anomalies,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 103523 [2108.10110]

  44. [44]

    S.S. Naik, K. Furuuchi and P. Chingangbam,Particle production during inflation: a Bayesian analysis with CMB data from Planck 2018,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics 2022(2022) 016 [2202.05862]

  45. [45]

    Hamann and J

    J. Hamann and J. Wons,Optimising inflationary features the Bayesian way,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2022(2022) 036 [2112.08571]

  46. [46]

    Antony, F

    A. Antony, F. Finelli, D.K. Hazra, D. Paoletti and A. Shafieloo,A search for super-imposed oscillations to the primordial power spectrum in Planck and SPT-3G 2018 data,arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2403.19575 [2403.19575]

  47. [47]

    Raffaelli and M

    A. Raffaelli and M. Ballardini,Knot reconstruction of the scalar primordial power spectrum with Planck, ACT, and SPT CMB data,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics 2025(2025) 077 [2503.10609]

  48. [48]

    Raffaelli, M

    A. Raffaelli, M. Ballardini and N. Barbieri,Signals from the early Universe: a comprehensive search for primordial features in Planck CMB datasets,2605.30236

  49. [49]

    Beutler, M

    F. Beutler, M. Biagetti, D. Green, A. Slosar and B. Wallisch,Primordial features from linear to nonlinear scales,Physical Review Research1(2019) 033209 [1906.08758]

  50. [50]

    Ballardini, F

    M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, F. Marulli, L. Moscardini and A. Veropalumbo,New constraints on primordial features from the galaxy two-point correlation function,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 043532 [2202.08819]

  51. [51]

    Mergulhão, F

    T. Mergulhão, F. Beutler and J.A. Peacock,Primordial feature constraints from BOSS + eBOSS,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2023(2023) 012 [2303.13946]

  52. [52]

    Calderon, T

    R. Calderon, T. Simon, A. Shafieloo and D.K. Hazra,Primordial Features in light of the Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structure,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2504.06183 [2504.06183]

  53. [53]

    X. Chen, R. Easther and E.A. Lim,Large non-Gaussianities in single-field inflation,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2007(2007) 023 [astro-ph/0611645]. – 25 –

  54. [54]

    Flauger and E

    R. Flauger and E. Pajer,Resonant non-gaussianity,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2011(2011) 017 [1002.0833]

  55. [55]

    Achúcarro, J.-O

    A. Achúcarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G.A. Palma and S.P. Patil,Features of heavy physics in the CMB power spectrum,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2011(2011) 030 [1010.3693]

  56. [56]

    Adshead, C

    P. Adshead, C. Dvorkin, W. Hu and E.A. Lim,Non-Gaussianity from step features in the inflationary potential,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 023531 [1110.3050]

  57. [57]

    Fergusson, H.F

    J.R. Fergusson, H.F. Gruetjen, E.P.S. Shellard and M. Liguori,Combining power spectrum and bispectrum measurements to detect oscillatory features,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 023502 [1410.5114]

  58. [58]

    Meerburg, M

    P.D. Meerburg, M. Münchmeyer and B. Wandelt,Joint resonant CMB power spectrum and bispectrum estimation,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 043536 [1510.01756]

  59. [59]

    Chen, P.D

    X. Chen, P.D. Meerburg and M. Münchmeyer,The future of primordial features with 21 cm tomography,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2016(2016) 023 [1605.09364]

  60. [60]

    Y. Xu, J. Hamann and X. Chen,Precise measurements of inflationary features with 21 cm observations,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 123518 [1607.00817]

  61. [61]

    Meerburg, M

    P.D. Meerburg, M. Münchmeyer, J.B. Muñoz and X. Chen,Prospects for cosmological collider physics,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2017(2017) 050 [1610.06559]

  62. [62]

    Ballardini, F

    M. Ballardini, F. Finelli, R. Maartens and L. Moscardini,Probing primordial features with next-generation photometric and radio surveys,Journal of Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics2018(2018) 044 [1712.07425]. [63]SKAcollaboration,Cosmology with Phase 1 of the Square Kilometre Array: Red Book 2018: Technical specifications and performance forecasts,Publ...

  63. [63]

    Castorina et al.,Redshift-weighted constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity from the clustering of the eBOSS DR14 quasars in Fourier space,JCAP09(2019) 010 [1904.08859]

    E. Castorina et al.,Redshift-weighted constraints on primordial non-Gaussianity from the clustering of the eBOSS DR14 quasars in Fourier space,JCAP09(2019) 010 [1904.08859]

  64. [64]

    Mueller, M

    E.-M. Mueller, M. Rezaie, W.J. Percival, A.J. Ross, R. Ruggeri, H.-J. Seo et al.,The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Primordial non-Gaussianity in Fourier Space,arXiv e-prints(2021) arXiv:2106.13725 [2106.13725]

  65. [65]

    Philcox and M.M

    O.H.E. Philcox and M.M. Ivanov,BOSS DR12 full-shape cosmology:ΛCDM constraints from the large-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum monopole,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 043517 [2112.04515]

  66. [66]

    Ivanov, O.H.E

    M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox, T. Nishimichi, M. Simonović, M. Takada and M. Zaldarriaga, Precision analysis of the redshift-space galaxy bispectrum,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 063512 [2110.10161]

  67. [67]

    D’Amico, M

    G. D’Amico, M. Lewandowski, L. Senatore and P. Zhang,Limits on primordial non-Gaussianities from BOSS galaxy-clustering data,2201.11518

  68. [68]

    Cabass, M.M

    G. Cabass, M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox, M. Simonović and M. Zaldarriaga,Constraints on Single-Field Inflation from the BOSS Galaxy Survey,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 021301 [2201.07238]

  69. [69]

    Cabass, M.M

    G. Cabass, M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox, M. Simonović and M. Zaldarriaga,Constraints on multifield inflation from the BOSS galaxy survey,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 043506 [2204.01781]

  70. [70]

    Sugiyama, D

    N.S. Sugiyama, D. Yamauchi, T. Kobayashi, T. Fujita, S. Arai, S. Hirano et al.,New – 26 – constraints on cosmological modified gravity theories from anisotropic three-point correlation functions of BOSS DR12 galaxies,2302.06808

  71. [71]

    Ivanov, O.H.E

    M.M. Ivanov, O.H.E. Philcox, G. Cabass, T. Nishimichi, M. Simonović and M. Zaldarriaga, Cosmology with the Galaxy Bispectrum Multipoles: Optimal Estimation and Application to BOSS Data,2302.04414

  72. [72]

    Cagliari, M

    M.S. Cagliari, M. Barberi-Squarotti, K. Pardede, E. Castorina and G. D’Amico,Bispectrum constraints on Primordial Non-Gaussianities with the eBOSS DR16 quasars,JCAP07(2025) 043 [2502.14758]

  73. [73]

    Karagiannis, A

    D. Karagiannis, A. Slosar and M. Liguori,Forecasts on Primordial non-Gaussianity from 21 cm Intensity Mapping experiments,JCAP11(2020) 052 [1911.03964]

  74. [74]

    Karagiannis, J

    D. Karagiannis, J. Fonseca, R. Maartens and S. Camera,Probing primordial non-Gaussianity with the power spectrum and bispectrum of future 21 cm intensity maps,Phys. Dark Univ.32 (2021) 100821 [2010.07034]

  75. [75]

    Karagiannis, R

    D. Karagiannis, R. Maartens and L.F. Randrianjanahary,Cosmological constraints from the power spectrum and bispectrum of 21cm intensity maps,JCAP11(2022) 003 [2206.07747]

  76. [76]

    Komatsu, N

    E. Komatsu, N. Afshordi, N. Bartolo, D. Baumann, J.R. Bond, E.I. Buchbinder et al., Non-Gaussianity as a Probe of the Physics of the Primordial Universe and the Astrophysics of the Low Redshift Universe,astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey2010 (2009) 158 [0902.4759]

  77. [77]

    Starobinsky,Spectrum of adiabatic perturbations in the universe when there are singularities in the inflation potential,JETP Lett.55(1992) 489

    A.A. Starobinsky,Spectrum of adiabatic perturbations in the universe when there are singularities in the inflation potential,JETP Lett.55(1992) 489

  78. [78]

    X. Chen, R. Easther and E.A. Lim,Generation and Characterization of Large Non-Gaussianities in Single Field Inflation,JCAP04(2008) 010 [0801.3295]

  79. [79]

    Chen,Folded Resonant Non-Gaussianity in General Single Field Inflation,JCAP12 (2010) 003 [1008.2485]

    X. Chen,Folded Resonant Non-Gaussianity in General Single Field Inflation,JCAP12 (2010) 003 [1008.2485]

  80. [80]

    Stewart,Spectrum of density perturbations produced during inflation to leading order in a general slow-roll approximation,Phys

    E.D. Stewart,Spectrum of density perturbations produced during inflation to leading order in a general slow-roll approximation,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 103508 [astro-ph/0110322]

Showing first 80 references.