REVIEW 2 cited by
Order Matters: Exploring Order Sensitivity in Multimodal Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) utilize multimodal contexts consisting of text, images, or videos to solve various multimodal tasks. However, we find that changing the order of multimodal input can cause the model's performance to fluctuate between advanced performance and random guessing. This phenomenon exists in both single-modality (text-only or image-only) and mixed-modality (image-text-pair) contexts. Furthermore, we demonstrate that popular MLLMs pay special attention to certain multimodal context positions, particularly the beginning and end. Leveraging this special attention, we place key video frames and important image/text content in special positions within the context and submit them to the MLLM for inference. This method results in average performance gains of 14.7% for video-caption matching and 17.8% for visual question answering tasks. Additionally, we propose a new metric, Position-Invariant Accuracy (PIA), to address order bias in MLLM evaluation. Our research findings contribute to a better understanding of Multi-Modal In-Context Learning (MMICL) and provide practical strategies for enhancing MLLM performance without increasing computational costs.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Lost at the End: Primacy Bias in Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering
Multimodal KB-VQA exhibits a primacy bias where gold passages at prompt start outperform those at the end by 16-26 points, flipping the text-only lost-in-the-middle pattern.
-
Who is in the Spotlight: The Hidden Bias Undermining Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Multimodal RAG models show a U-shaped position bias in evidence ordering, and the bias grows logarithmically with the number of retrieved items, according to a new metric.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.