REVIEW 1 cited by
Understanding $\Omega_\mathrm{gw}(f)$ in Gravitational Wave Experiments
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this paper we provide a comprehensive derivation of the energy density in the stochastic gravitational-wave background $\Omega_\mathrm{gw}(f)$, and show how this quantity is measured in ground-based detectors such as Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), space-based Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), and Pulsar Timing Arrays. By definition $\Omega_\mathrm{gw}(f) \propto S_h(f)$ -- the power spectral density (PSD) of the Fourier modes of the gravitational-wave background. However, this is often confused with the PSD of the strain signal, which we call $S_\mathrm{gw}(f)$, and is a detector-dependent quantity. This has led to confusing definitions of $\Omega_\mathrm{gw}(f)$ in the literature which differ by factors of up to 5 when written in a detector-dependent way. In addition to clarifying this confusion, formulas presented in this paper facilitate easy comparison of results from different detector groups, and how to convert from one measure of the strength of the background (or an upper limit) to another. Our codes are public and on GitHub.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
All You Need is not $\Omega_\mathrm{gw}$: Beyond the Mean of the Cross-Correlation Estimator when Searching for an Astrophysical Gravitational-Wave Background
For a two-detector Cosmic Explorer network, the cross-correlation estimator of the binary black hole background has skewness 0.31 and excess kurtosis 1.3 at 20 Hz, a non-Gaussianity that will matter for next-generatio...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.