Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 27 references

CCAT: The 410 GHz camera module for FYST - design and testing of the MKID focal plane

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 660 µm³ TiN MKID is photon-noise limited at 410 GHz.

desk verdict Useful first 410 GHz MKID camera-module characterization, with a fixable but real optical-efficiency inconsistency between the fitted 0.675 and the assumed >90%. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.04282 v1 pith:K4VH7UNL submitted 2026-08-04 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.GA

Scott C. Chapman , Jordan Wheeler , Anthony Huber , Jason Austermann , James A. Beall , James Burgoyne , Max Chapman , Jesslyn Devina
show 11 more authors
Douglas Henke Johannes Hubmayr Dylan Lockyer Michael Niemack Tilak M. Patel Colin Ross Douglas Scott Adrian Sinclair Eve Vavagiakis Michael R. Vissers Ruixuan (Matt) Xie
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IMastro-ph.GA
keywords kineticinductancedetectorsMKIDarrays410GHzsubmillimetercameraTiNsuperconductingresonatorsphoton-noise-limitedsensitivitytwo-octavereadoutmappingspeedhorn-coupledfocalplane
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that a titanium-nitride microwave kinetic inductance detector (MKID) with a 660 µm³ inductor volume is the right pixel for the 410 GHz camera module of the Fred Young Submillimeter Telescope, reaching a noise-equivalent power below $10^{-15}\ \mathrm{W\,Hz^{-1/2}}$ under the expected 10–20 pW sky loading, with the noise set by photon shot noise rather than by the detector or readout. The authors test four inductor volumes optically, find the two smallest too responsive and the largest no longer photon-noise limited, and select 660 µm³ as the fiducial design for roughly 20,000 detectors across three arrays. The case for caring is that 410 GHz is a high-transmission window that has never been widely surveyed, and filling the module's 1.3-degree field with about 20,000 horn-coupled MKIDs would improve mapping speed by more than 60% over a 10,000-detector baseline, enabling large surveys of dusty star-forming galaxies, galaxy clusters, and cosmic microwave background foregrounds.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the lumped-element MKID: a superconducting resonator whose resonant frequency shifts when absorbed photons break Cooper pairs into quasiparticles. The optically active part is a crosshair-shaped TiN inductor whose volume sets both absorption and responsivity, surrounded by an arc-shaped dark inductor that tunes the resonance. Shorting pairs of inductor lines cuts the kinetic inductance by $1/N^2$ and provides coarse frequency tuning, while two interdigitated-capacitor widths give fine tuning, spreading resonators across the 300–1350 MHz readout band. A septalayer TiN/Ti film supplies the kinetic inductance ($51.1\ \mathrm{pH}/\square$), sheet resistance ($31.5\ \Omega/\square$), and critical temperature ($\sim850$ mK) that let a 660 µm³ pixel hold $Q_i \approx 30{,}000$ under loading and stay photon-noise limited.

What would settle it

An end-to-end measurement of the optical efficiency of the silicon-platelet feedhorn plus 660 µm³ pixel in the 390–430 GHz band with a calibrated source would settle the question: if the fitted efficiency stays near 0.675 rather than above 0.9, the photon-noise NEP quoted for 15 pW loading is optimistic by roughly 15%, and the mapping-speed projection by roughly 30%.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a septalayer TiN MKID with a 660 µm³ inductor volume meets the 410 GHz sensitivity target. Measured dark $Q_i$ values fall between $60{,}000$ and $220{,}000$, the critical temperature is about 850 mK, the sheet resistance is $31.5\ \Omega/\square$, the kinetic inductance is $51.1\ \mathrm{pH}/\square$, and the quasiparticle time constant is near 0.2 ms. Under calibrated blackbody loading, all four volumes reach NEP below $10^{-15}\ \mathrm{W\,Hz^{-1/2}}$, but the 660 µm³ volume alone keeps $Q_i \approx 30{,}000$ across the expected 10–20 pW load while remaining photon-noise dominated at the 500 Hz readout frequency. The paper therefore adopts $Q_c = 30{,}000$ to match $Q_i$ and proposes this pixel for arrays of roughly 6,700 MKIDs, noting that the white-noise fit yields an optical efficiency of about 0.675 while a feedhorn calculation cited from the literature predicts above 90%.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the fraction of incoming 390–430 GHz light that reaches the detector is above 90%, while the white-noise fit in Section 5.1 returns about 0.675; if the measured figure is the real system efficiency, the quoted NEP and mapping-speed projections are optimistic.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At the expected 10–20 pW loading, the 660 µm³ pixel reaches NEP below $10^{-15}\ \mathrm{W\,Hz^{-1/2}}$ with photon noise dominating at the readout frequency, so the 410 GHz module would be sky-limited rather than detector-limited.
  • With $Q_i \approx Q_c \approx 30{,}000$ and the inductor-shorting trick, about 20,000 resonators fit in the 300–1350 MHz band, with more than 4,000 detectors per readout board.
  • Filling the 1.3-degree field at $F\lambda \approx 1.3$ with about 20,000 horn-coupled MKIDs improves mapping speed by more than 60% over a 10,000-detector baseline.
  • The module would enable wide-area 410 GHz surveys of dusty star-forming galaxies, Sunyaev-Zeldovich clusters, and cosmic microwave background foregrounds that complement 350 GHz and 850 GHz channels.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the system optical efficiency is the measured ~0.675 rather than the assumed above-90%, the quoted NEP at 15 pW is optimistic by about 15% and the mapping-speed projection by roughly 30%; the design would then need a better feedhorn or a larger pixel volume.
  • Editorial inference: the $1/N^2$ shorting trick generalizes: shorting more than two inductor lines could create even higher-volume pixels at the same resonance frequency, potentially allowing denser $F\lambda$ packing if readout bandwidth grows.
  • Editorial inference: blackbody optical tests do not reproduce the atmospheric spectral shape or the exact low-frequency noise environment at Cerro Chajnantor; the paper notes two-level-system noise still contributes at 1 Hz, so an on-sky loading and NEP measurement is the natural next test.
  • Editorial inference: the mapping-speed analysis implies that detector count beyond 20,000 yields diminishing returns, so the practical limit on module size is set by readout bandwidth and horn efficiency rather than by pixel fabrication yield.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper describes the design and initial optical characterization of TiN lumped-element MKID prototypes for the 410 GHz Prime-Cam module on FYST. Four inductor volumes (232, 377, 660, and 1,290 µm^3) were fabricated in a septalayer TiN/Ti film and tested in dark and with a calibrated cryogenic blackbody. Dark Qi values of 60,000–220,000 are reported; under optical loading up to 67 pW the devices reach white NEP below 10^-15 W/Hz^0.5, with the 660 µm^3 volume selected as the fiducial design because it is photon-noise limited at the expected 10–20 pW sky load and has Qi≈30,000; a matched Qc=30,000 is proposed. The paper also presents mapping-speed versus detector-count scaling for horn-coupled arrays and a two-octave RFSoC readout plan for ~20,000 detectors. A white-noise fit gives system optical efficiency ε≈0.675, while a separate feedhorn calculation is quoted as >90% over 390–430 GHz; this discrepancy is not reconciled.

Significance. If the detector performance claims hold, this is a useful and timely result: it demonstrates a route to roughly 20,000 dual-polarization MKIDs in a 410 GHz band that is otherwise not planned, with calibrated blackbody measurements rather than a purely modeled sensitivity estimate, and it explicitly compares four volume designs to select an operating point. The paper also benefits from using a standard four-parameter noise model (Eq. 2) and from reporting the loading dependence of Qi and NEP. The main value—a fiducial 660 µm^3 MKID with Qc=30,000 that is photon-noise limited at expected loading—is, however, contingent on resolving the efficiency scale and on adding uncertainties to the fitted parameters.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1, Fig. 7 (left)] The white-noise fit of Section 5.1 (Fig. 7, left) yields an optical efficiency ε≈0.675, reported as consistent across all four volumes, while two paragraphs later the text states 'The expected efficiency over the 390 to 430 GHz is expected to be above 90%,' citing the feedhorn calculation in ref. [27]. These statements are not reconciled in the manuscript. If ε≈0.675 is the true end-to-end efficiency, the absorbed power at the predicted 10–20 pW sky load is roughly 25% lower than assumed, moving the Qi-versus-loading curve in Fig. 7 (right) and altering the photon-noise-limited NEP at 500 Hz, and the §2 mapping-speed projections would be affected accordingly. If ε≈0.675 is instead dominated by test-cryostat losses (filters, blackbody, beam filling), the manuscript needs to say so and provide a systematic-uncertainty budget. As written, the reader cannot determine which efficiency governs the central NEP and array-sensitivity claims, so the discrepancy is load-bearing.
  2. [§5.1, Fig. 7] No uncertainties are reported for the fitted parameters ε, Qi, and NEP, and the comparison uses one device per volume. The paper's fiducial choice of the 660 µm^3 volume and the proposed Qc=30,000 follow from differences among the four tested volumes at an assumed 10–20 pW loading; without error bars or repeat measurements, it is not possible to tell whether 660 µm^3 is statistically distinguishable from the 377 µm^3 or 1,290 µm^3 designs, or whether the quoted NEP < 10^-15 W/Hz^0.5 is robust. The authors should add fit uncertainties and, where feasible, multiple devices per volume or a statement of run-to-run reproducibility.
  3. [§5.1, proposed Qc] The design loop is explicit: Qc=30,000 is proposed 'to have Qi≃Qc under loading', matching the measured Qi≈30,000, and the 660 µm^3 volume is selected from only four tested values under the assumed loading. This is a reasonable design choice rather than a circular measurement, but the manuscript should state it as such and give a tolerance or sensitivity analysis showing how performance changes if the actual loading or Qi differs by, say, 20–30% from the assumed values. Currently the robustness of the fiducial design to these variations is not demonstrated.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 7 (left) caption] The caption gives the volume range as '252 through 1,290 µm^3', while the text uses 232 µm^3 as the smallest volume; please correct the typo.
  2. [§2 and Abstract] Section 2 states that the Gen-2 readout limits the detector count to about 18,000, whereas the abstract and Section 6 quote ~20,000 MKIDs over three arrays; the manuscript should reconcile these numbers or explain the difference.
  3. [§5.1] The sentence 'The expected efficiency over the 390 to 430 GHz is expected to be above 90%' is redundant ('expected... expected') and should specify whether the 90% figure refers to the feedhorn coupling alone or to the end-to-end optical efficiency.
  4. [§3.1, Eq. (1)] Equation (1) is difficult to parse as typeset; please check the bracket structure and define each symbol just before the equation, particularly the factor containing sqrt(2Δ0/πkBT).
  5. [§5.1, Fig. 6] The text says TLS noise is 'subdominant' to photon noise but 'still contributes significantly'; please clarify whether this refers to 1 Hz or to the 500 Hz readout frequency, since Fig. 6 shows a strong frequency dependence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Central detector results are calibrated measurements, not derived predictions; the >90% vs 0.675 efficiency conflict is an unresolved validation gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing numbers are empirical: NEP versus incident power is measured against a calibrated cryogenic blackbody (Section 4), Qi is measured as a function of optical loading (Fig. 7), and the optical efficiency epsilon ~ 0.675 is a fit to the white-noise component of those measurements. The choice of the 660 cubic-micrometer inductor is a design selection from four tested volumes based on measured Qi (~30,000) and photon-noise-limited NEP under 10-20 pW loading, not a quantity that was put into the fit and then read back out. Similarly, adopting Qc = 30,000 to match the measured Qi is an impedance-matching design target, not a fitted prediction. The only mildly self-referential element is the citation of the collaboration's own silicon-platelet feedhorn paper [27] for the >90% efficiency used in the loading estimate, while Section 5.1 simultaneously reports a fitted end-to-end efficiency of about 0.675. That inconsistency is a genuine correctness/systematics issue for the projected loading and mapping speed, and the manuscript should supply a systematic-uncertainty budget or explain the test-cryostat contribution to the 0.675 value. It is not circular, however: the detector performance claim does not force the efficiency to equal itself, and the fitted epsilon is not relabeled as a prediction. No self-definition, uniqueness-import, ansatz-smuggling, or renaming pattern is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on four measurement-based premises: the responsivity model, the subdominance of TLS noise at 410 GHz loading, the Griffin feedhorn efficiency curves, and the expected optical efficiency above 90%. The first is standard physics; the latter three are domain assumptions, one of which conflicts with the paper's own measured efficiency. The free parameters are the assumed sky load, the chosen Qc, and the fitted optical efficiency.

free parameters (3)
  • Sky loading estimate = 10-20 pW
    Used to select the 660 µm^3 inductor volume as optimal (Sec. 5.1); estimated for the module's horn size and filter band, not directly measured in this paper.
  • Target coupling quality factor Qc = 30,000
    Adopted so that Qi is approximately equal to Qc under loading; the value mirrors the measured Qi of about 30,000 for the 660 µm^3 design (Sec. 5.1, Fig. 7 right).
  • Optical efficiency (fitted) = ~0.675
    Derived from white NEP versus blackbody loading (Fig. 7 left); enters the projected sensitivity of the array.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math The responsivity model of Eq. 1 (d f0 / dPabs) from Gao and Mauskopf is valid for these TiN MKIDs.
    The optimization argument in Sec. 3.1 uses this formula to justify increasing superconducting volume under higher loading.
  • domain assumption TiN 1/f (TLS) noise is subdominant to photon noise at 410 GHz loading levels, extrapolated from the 850 GHz module results.
    Section 3 states this based on 850 GHz results (Huber et al. 2024); it is not directly demonstrated at 410 GHz in this paper.
  • domain assumption Feedhorn aperture and spillover efficiencies used in the mapping-speed calculation are taken from Griffin et al. (2002) and apply to the F-lambda range 1-2.
    Section 2 uses these external efficiency curves to claim a 60% mapping-speed gain for about 20,000 detectors; the curves are not re-derived.
  • domain assumption The optical efficiency over 390-430 GHz is above 90% as calculated in ref [27].
    Section 5.1 states this expected efficiency, which is inconsistent with the measured ~0.675 efficiency from the same section.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of CCAT: The 410 GHz camera module for FYST - design and testing of the MKID focal plane." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K4VH7UNL

@misc{pith2026260804282,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: CCAT: The 410 GHz camera module for FYST - design and testing of the MKID focal plane},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K4VH7UNL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.04282}
}
read the original abstract

Prime-Cam, the primary first-light instrument for the Fred Young Submillimeter Telescope (FYST) developed by the Cerro Chajnantor Atacama Telescope (CCAT) Collaboration, will accommodate seven modules. Here we describe the off-central 410 GHz imager/polarimeter. The 410 GHz instrument is a camera module for CCAT funded by the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, being developed as a collaboration between Dalhousie University, University of British Columbia (UBC), National Research Council (NRC) - Herzberg, and Duke University. With atmospheric loading in the 410 GHz window being significantly higher than at 350 GHz (but substantially lower than 850 GHz), we assess four MKID test devices with varying inductor volume for performance at 410 GHz. We propose a design for an array of ~6,700 horn-coupled TiN MKIDs optimized for use at 410 GHz, with a planned ~20,000 MKIDs over three arrays, exploring mapping speed versus detector number. We test the four MKID devices optically and assess optimal Qi/Qc and responsivity for the 410 GHz atmospheric window atop Cerro Chajnantor. The detectors will be designed in frequency to be efficiently readout with a second generation, two octave readout (based on the Xilinx RFSoC board), with over 4000 detectors per board.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.04282 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: Atmospheric transmission at the CCAT site, Cerro Chajnantor, identifying the exquisite 410 GHz trans [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Top Left: FYST sited at an elevation of 5600 m (photo credit: Margaret Chapman). Top Right: Configuration of instrument modules within Prime-Cam.13 Bottom: Schematic of the planned 410 GHz optics tube, with location of the MKID arrays described herein indicated at right. The 410 GHz module is a close replication of the 350 GHz module.14 4. Monitor and search for time-dependent events: a wide variety of transient sou… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Left: Number of detectors required to fill the candidate camera designs with fields-of-view 1.3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top Left: Sample fabricated inductor with two polarization-sensitive kinetic inductance detectors in a single pixel. Each inductor consists of dark inductance around the arc (defining the circular shape) and optically active inductor (seen as the “crosshair”). The dire…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Resonances with different loading for one of the 410 GHz test devices with a dark resonance peak at 608.1 MHz. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Noise (in Sxx units with increasing optical loading measured on the four different volume resonators (232 through 1,290 µm3 ). At lower loading, TLS noise is subdominant to photon noise, but still contributes significantly. At frequencies greater than roughly 2 kHz the…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left: White noise equivalent power as a function of incident power for the different volume resonators (252 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [27]

    CCAT: Silicon- Platelet Feedhorns for Submillimeter Wavelengths,

    J. Austermann, J. Beall, J. R. Burgoyne, S. Chapman, S. Choi, C. J. Duell, A. I. Huber, J. Hubmayr, M. A. Koc, M. D. Niemack, J. N. Ullom, J. van Lanen, A. Vaskuri, M. Vissers, and J. Wheeler, “CCAT: Silicon- Platelet Feedhorns for Submillimeter Wavelengths,”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity36, pp. 1500708–1500708, Jan. 2026

    work page 2026

  2. [1]

    CCAT-prime: a novel telescope for sub-millimeter astronomy,

    Parshley, S. et al., “CCAT-prime: a novel telescope for sub-millimeter astronomy,” inGround-based and Airborne Telescopes VII, H. K. Marshall and J. Spyromilio, eds.,10700, pp. 1744 – 1758, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2018

    work page 2018

  3. [2]

    Designs for a large-aperture telescope to map the cmb 10x faster,

    Niemack, M., “Designs for a large-aperture telescope to map the cmb 10x faster,”Appl. Opt.55, pp. 1688 – 1696, Mar. 2016

    work page 2016

  4. [3]

    The optical design of the six-meter CCAT-prime and Simons Observatory telescopes,

    Parshley, S. et al., “The optical design of the six-meter CCAT-prime and Simons Observatory telescopes,” inGround-based and Airborne Telescopes VII, H. K. Marshall and J. Spyromilio, eds.,10700, pp. 1292 – 1304, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [4]

    Prime-Cam: a first-light instrument for the CCAT-prime telescope,

    Vavagiakis, E. M. et al., “Prime-Cam: a first-light instrument for the CCAT-prime telescope,” inMillimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy IX, J. Zmuidzinas and J.-R. Gao, eds.,10708, pp. 187 – 202, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2018

    work page 2018

  6. [5]

    A 350 micron camera module for the Prime-Cam instrument on CCAT-prime,

    Chapman, S. C. et al., “A 350 micron camera module for the Prime-Cam instrument on CCAT-prime,” in Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy X, J. Zmuidzinas and J.-R. Gao, eds.,11453, p. 1145305, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [6]

    CCAT-Prime: science with an ultra-widefield submillimeter observatory on Cerro Cha- jnantor,

    Stacey, G. et al., “CCAT-Prime: science with an ultra-widefield submillimeter observatory on Cerro Cha- jnantor,” inGround-based and Airborne Telescopes VII, H. K. Marshall and J. Spyromilio, eds.,10700, pp. 482 – 501, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [7]

    CCAT-prime Collaboration: Science Goals and Forecasts with Prime-Cam on the Fred Young Submillimeter Telescope,

    Prime Collaboration, “CCAT-prime Collaboration: Science Goals and Forecasts with Prime-Cam on the Fred Young Submillimeter Telescope,” 2022

    work page 2022

Show all 27 references
  1. [8]

    CCAT-prime: RFSoC based readout for frequency multiplexed kinetic inductance detectors,

    Sinclair, A. K. et al., “CCAT-prime: RFSoC based readout for frequency multiplexed kinetic inductance detectors,” inMillimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XI, J. Zmuidzinas and J.-R. Gao, eds.,12190, p. 121900W, International So...

    2022

  2. [9]

    CCAT-prime: the 850 GHz camera for prime-cam on FYST,

    Chapman, S. C. et al., “CCAT-prime: the 850 GHz camera for prime-cam on FYST,” 2022

    2022

  3. [10]

    A Redshift Survey of the Submillimeter Galaxy Population,

    S. C. Chapman, A. W. Blain, I. Smail, and R. J. Ivison, “A Redshift Survey of the Submillimeter Galaxy Population,”ApJ622, pp. 772–796, Apr. 2005

    2005

  4. [11]

    SHARC-2 350µm Observations of Distant Submillimeter-selected Galaxies,

    A. Kovács, S. C. Chapman, C. D. Dowell, A. W. Blain, R. J. Ivison, I. Smail, and T. G. Phillips, “SHARC-2 350µm Observations of Distant Submillimeter-selected Galaxies,”ApJ650, pp. 592–603, Oct. 2006

    2006

  5. [12]

    A median redshift of 2.4 for galaxies bright at submillimetre wavelengths,

    S. C. Chapman, A. W. Blain, R. J. Ivison, and I. R. Smail, “A median redshift of 2.4 for galaxies bright at submillimetre wavelengths,”Nat422, pp. 695–698, Apr. 2003

    2003

  6. [13]

    Extending to the Submillimeter Universe with the CCAT Observatory,

    E. M. Vavagiakis, “Extending to the Submillimeter Universe with the CCAT Observatory,”arXiv e-prints , p. arXiv:2511.01707, Nov. 2025

    2025

  7. [14]

    CCAT: Comparisons of 280 GHz TiN and Al Kinetic Inductance Detector Arrays,

    Duell, C. J. et al., “CCAT: Comparisons of 280 GHz TiN and Al Kinetic Inductance Detector Arrays,” arXiv, Jun. 2024

    2024

  8. [15]

    Relative performance of filled and feedhorn-coupled focal-plane architectures,

    Griffin, M. J., Bock, J. J., and Gear, W. K., “Relative performance of filled and feedhorn-coupled focal-plane architectures,”Appl. Opt.41, pp. 6543–6554, Nov. 2002

    2002

  9. [16]

    CCAT-Prime: Characterization of the First 280 GHz MKID Array for Prime-Cam,

    Choi, S. K. et al., “CCAT-Prime: Characterization of the First 280 GHz MKID Array for Prime-Cam,” Journal of Low Temperature Physics209, pp. 849 – 856, Dec. 2022

    2022

  10. [17]

    CCAT: multirate DSP for sub-mm astronomy: polyphase synthesis filter bank on FPGA for enhanced MKID readout,

    Xie, M. et al., “CCAT: multirate DSP for sub-mm astronomy: polyphase synthesis filter bank on FPGA for enhanced MKID readout,” inMillimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XII, J. Zmuidzinas and J.-R. Gao, eds.,13102, p. 1310213, In...

    2024

  11. [18]

    CCAT: design and performance of densely packed, high-frequency, dual-polarization kinetic inductance detectors for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz module,

    Huber, A. I. et al., “CCAT: design and performance of densely packed, high-frequency, dual-polarization kinetic inductance detectors for the Prime-Cam 850 GHz module,” inMillimeter, Submillimeter, and Far- Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XII, J. Zmuidzinas...

    2024

  12. [19]

    Two-level system noise reduction for Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors,

    Noroozian, O. et al., “Two-level system noise reduction for Microwave Kinetic Inductance Detectors,”AIP Conference Proceedings1185, pp. 148–151, Dec. 2009

    2009

  13. [20]

    PhD thesis, California Institute of Tech- nology, 2008

    Gao, J.,The Physics of Superconducting Microwave Resonators. PhD thesis, California Institute of Tech- nology, 2008

    2008

  14. [21]

    Transition edge sensors and kinetic inductance detectors in astronomical instruments,

    P. D. Mauskopf, “Transition edge sensors and kinetic inductance detectors in astronomical instruments,” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific130, p. 082001, Jun. 2018

    2018

  15. [22]

    Proximity-coupled Ti/TiN multilayers for use in kinetic inductance detectors,

    Vissers, M. R. et al., “Proximity-coupled Ti/TiN multilayers for use in kinetic inductance detectors,”Applied Physics Letters102, p. 232603, 06 2013

    2013

  16. [23]

    Broadband kinetic inductance detectors for far-IR observations,

    Wheeler, J. et al., “Broadband kinetic inductance detectors for far-IR observations,” inMillimeter, Submil- limeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy XI, J. Zmuidzinas and J.-R. Gao, eds.,12190, p. 1219006, International Society for Optics and Photo...

    2022

  17. [24]

    A review of metal mesh filters,

    Ade, P. A. R. et al., “A review of metal mesh filters,” inMillimeter and Submillimeter Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy III, J. Zmuidzinas, W. S. Holland, S. Withington, and W. D. Duncan, eds., 6275, p. 62750U, International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2006

    2006

  18. [25]

    Noise optimization for mkids with different design geometries and material selections,

    Pan, Z. et al., “Noise optimization for mkids with different design geometries and material selections,”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity33(5), pp. 1–8, 2023

    2023

  19. [26]

    Ultra-sensitive thz microwave kinetic inductance detectors for future space telescopes,

    Baselmans, J. J. A. et al., “Ultra-sensitive thz microwave kinetic inductance detectors for future space telescopes,”A&A665, p. A17, 2022

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.