pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18552 · v1 · pith:K66IBYJLnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph· physics.ins-det

Towards Entanglement-Enhanced Atom Interferometry Using Bow-Tie Cavities

Christian Mancini , Marco Malitesta , Tommaso Mariani , Annalisa Pappalardo , Giuseppe Vinelli , Paolo Vezio , Gabriele Rosi , Enrico Meli
show 2 more authors
Leonardo Salvi Guglielmo Maria Tino
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 21:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.ins-det
keywords bow-tie cavitystrontiumatom interferometryspin squeezingquantum non-demolitionentanglementcavity finesse
0
0 comments X

The pith

A monolithic bow-tie cavity provides homogeneous coupling to strontium atoms for entanglement-enhanced atom interferometry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports the construction of a bow-tie optical cavity designed for use with strontium atoms in atom interferometers. The cavity's traveling-wave geometry ensures uniform interaction between light and the entire atomic ensemble, even as atoms fall freely. This uniformity supports the generation of entangled atomic states through cavity feedback or quantum non-demolition measurements. With a measured finesse of 57,000, the device is projected to deliver up to 28 decibels of metrological improvement for ensembles of 100,000 atoms, exceeding the standard quantum limit.

Core claim

The paper establishes that a monolithic bow-tie cavity operating on the strontium 689 nm transition achieves a finesse of 5.7 times 10 to the 4 with two foci of 164 and 31 micrometers, delivering homogeneous atom-light coupling that enables metrological gains approaching 24 dB through cavity-feedback squeezing and 28 dB through quantum non-demolition measurements for up to 10^5 atoms.

What carries the argument

The traveling-wave bow-tie cavity geometry, which ensures homogeneous atom-light coupling across the ensemble unlike standing-wave resonators.

If this is right

  • The cavity supports generation of squeezed states via multiple strategies.
  • High mechanical stability and robustness against misalignment are achieved.
  • Access to different atom-cavity coupling regimes is provided by the two foci.
  • Efficient extraction of atomic information is possible due to sufficient mirror transmission.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the homogeneous coupling holds during free fall, the platform could extend to other atomic species for tests of fundamental physics.
  • The design may allow integration with existing atom interferometer setups to surpass current sensitivity limits.
  • Further optimization of the cavity parameters could push squeezing levels higher for larger ensembles.

Load-bearing premise

The traveling-wave geometry maintains uniform atom-light coupling throughout the motion of freely falling atoms in the ensemble.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of atom-light coupling strength variation across the ensemble or observed squeezing below the projected 24-28 dB levels for 10^5 atoms would falsify the expected performance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18552 by Annalisa Pappalardo, Christian Mancini, Enrico Meli, Gabriele Rosi, Giuseppe Vinelli, Guglielmo Maria Tino, Leonardo Salvi, Marco Malitesta, Paolo Vezio, Tommaso Mariani.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: a) Scheme of the optical cavity with the indication of the four mirrors M1-M4 and the location of the primary ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 3D rendering of the assembly setup. The central holder maintains constant pressure on the mirrors in appropriate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Photograph of the titanium cavity after the mirrors were glued to the spacer. The 689 nm laser path is highlighted in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Exponential decay of the reflected light used to determine the cavity finesse. Inset: results of ten independent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic representation of the relevant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Squeezing by quantum non-demolition measurements: minimum Wineland squeezing parameter, Eq. (1), as a function of N, the atom number, in panel (a), and F, the cavity finesse, in panel (b). Results assume a detector efficiency ηdet = 0.5. In panel (b), dotted vertical lines identify the optimal values of F in F1 and F2. For N = 104 atoms, we predict 17.8 dB of squeezing in F2 and 28.7 dB in F1. For N = 105 … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Atom interferometers are among the most sensitive instruments for precision measurements and tests of fundamental physics. Their performance, however, is ultimately limited by quantum projection noise when uncorrelated atomic ensembles are employed. Cavity-assisted generation of entangled states has proven to be a promising route toward quantum-enhanced interferometry beyond the standard quantum limit. In this work, we present the realization and characterization of a monolithic bow-tie cavity developed to achieve a strong collective atom-light coupling with strontium atoms. Unlike conventional standing-wave Fabry-P\'erot resonators, the traveling-wave geometry of the bow-tie cavity provides homogeneous atom-light coupling over the entire atomic ensemble, making it particularly suitable for entanglement-enhanced atom interferometry with freely falling atoms. The monolithic cavity architecture presents several scientifically relevant features such as high mechanical stability, high finesse, robustness against mirror misalignment, optical and atomic access and the option of generating squeezed states through different strategies. The cavity was realized for operation on the strontium $(5s^2) ^1S_0-(5s5p) ^3P_1$ transition at 689 nm and achieves a finesse of $\mathcal{F}=5.7\times 10^4$ while keeping the transmission of a single mirror sufficiently large to allow for efficient atomic information extraction. In this geometry, the cavity supports two foci with waists of 164 $\mu$m and 31 $\mu$m which gives access to different regimes of atom-cavity coupling. For ensembles containing up to $10^5$ atoms, the cavity is expected to enable metrological gains approaching 24 dB of spin squeezing through cavity-feedback squeezing, and 28 dB through quantum non-demolition measurements, demonstrating its potential as a platform for next-generation quantum-enhanced atom interferometers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the design, fabrication, and optical characterization of a monolithic bow-tie traveling-wave cavity for the strontium 689 nm transition. It achieves a measured finesse of 5.7×10^4, supports two foci (waists 164 μm and 31 μm), and projects metrological gains of ~24 dB (cavity-feedback squeezing) and ~28 dB (QND) for N≤10^5 atoms on the basis of homogeneous atom-light coupling in the traveling-wave geometry, positioning the device as a platform for entanglement-enhanced atom interferometry with freely falling atoms.

Significance. The monolithic bow-tie architecture provides a stable, high-finesse cavity with good optical and atomic access and the ability to operate in different coupling regimes via the two foci; these are concrete engineering strengths. If the projected squeezing levels are realized, the work would constitute a meaningful step toward quantum-enhanced atom interferometry. The significance is tempered by the fact that the headline gain numbers rest on an unverified uniformity assumption and that no actual squeezing data are presented.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the projected 24 dB and 28 dB metrological gains presuppose that the single-atom coupling g can be treated as constant across the ensemble. The 31 μm waist gives a mode area ~3×10^3 μm²; for typical 10^5-atom Sr ensembles with rms radii 50–150 μm after release, atoms experience >10% variation in |E(r)|². No calculation of the position-dependent cooperativity, effective squeezing parameter ξ², or inhomogeneous averaging along a free-fall trajectory is supplied, rendering the numerical claims unsupported.
  2. [Cavity characterization] Cavity characterization section: the reported finesse F=5.7×10^4 is stated without accompanying raw transmission/reflection spectra, linewidth data, or uncertainty analysis. In the absence of these, the claim that the cavity is suitable for the required collective cooperativity cannot be independently assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the traveling-wave geometry 'provides homogeneous atom-light coupling' but does not quantify residual longitudinal variation between the two foci or residual transverse gradients.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and careful reading of the manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the projected 24 dB and 28 dB metrological gains presuppose that the single-atom coupling g can be treated as constant across the ensemble. The 31 μm waist gives a mode area ~3×10^3 μm²; for typical 10^5-atom Sr ensembles with rms radii 50–150 μm after release, atoms experience >10% variation in |E(r)|². No calculation of the position-dependent cooperativity, effective squeezing parameter ξ², or inhomogeneous averaging along a free-fall trajectory is supplied, rendering the numerical claims unsupported.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the quoted projections require justification of the homogeneity assumption. The manuscript emphasizes the traveling-wave geometry for homogeneity, but the two foci enable different regimes: the 164 μm waist (mode area ~8.5×10^4 μm²) is intended for the large-ensemble homogeneous coupling underlying the 24 dB and 28 dB projections, while the 31 μm waist targets stronger local coupling. For the 164 μm waist, intensity variation remains below ~5% across rms radii up to 100 μm. We will add explicit calculations of the position-dependent cooperativity, effective ξ², and trajectory-averaged squeezing in the revised manuscript (new subsection in Sec. IV or V) and will clarify in the abstract which waist is used for each projection. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Cavity characterization] Cavity characterization section: the reported finesse F=5.7×10^4 is stated without accompanying raw transmission/reflection spectra, linewidth data, or uncertainty analysis. In the absence of these, the claim that the cavity is suitable for the required collective cooperativity cannot be independently assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the raw data and uncertainty analysis should be included to allow independent verification. In the revised manuscript we will add the measured transmission and reflection spectra, the cavity linewidth data, and the uncertainty estimate for F=5.7×10^4 (new figure or supplementary material referenced from the cavity characterization section). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental cavity characterization with forward projections based on measured parameters.

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental report on the design, fabrication, and characterization of a bow-tie cavity (finesse, waists, transmission). The metrological-gain projections (24 dB, 28 dB) are stated as expectations for N ≤ 10^5 atoms but are not derived from any internal equations that reduce to fitted inputs by construction; they rest on standard cavity-QED formulas applied to the measured cavity parameters. No self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The traveling-wave homogeneity claim is an engineering assertion supported by the geometry description rather than a mathematical identity. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on standard cavity-QED assumptions to convert measured finesse and geometry into projected squeezing values; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard cavity QED theory applies to predict squeezing levels from measured finesse, waists, and atom number.
    The 24 dB and 28 dB projections rest on this background theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5891 in / 1268 out tokens · 27869 ms · 2026-06-26T21:10:33.461059+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 181 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Campbell, S. L. and Gear, C. W. The index of general nonlinear D A E S. Numer. M ath. 1995

    1995

  2. [2]

    Slifka, M. K. and Whitton, J. L. Clinical implications of dysregulated cytokine production. J. M ol. M ed. 2000. doi:10.1007/s001090000086

    work page doi:10.1007/s001090000086 2000

  3. [3]

    Quasimonotonicity, regularity and duality for nonlinear systems of partial differential equations

    Hamburger, C. Quasimonotonicity, regularity and duality for nonlinear systems of partial differential equations. Ann. Mat. Pura. Appl. 1995

    1995

  4. [4]

    Geddes, K. O. and Czapor, S. R. and Labahn, G. Algorithms for C omputer A lgebra. 1992

    1992

  5. [5]

    Software engineering---from auxiliary to key technologies

    Broy, M. Software engineering---from auxiliary to key technologies. Software Pioneers. 1992

    1992

  6. [6]

    Conductive P olymers. 1981

    1981

  7. [7]

    Smith, S. E. Neuromuscular blocking drugs in man. Neuromuscular junction. H andbook of experimental pharmacology. 1976

    1976

  8. [8]

    Chung, S. T. and Morris, R. L. Isolation and characterization of plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid from Streptomyces fradiae. 1978

    1978

  9. [9]

    and AghaKouchak, A

    Hao, Z. and AghaKouchak, A. and Nakhjiri, N. and Farahmand, A. Global integrated drought monitoring and prediction system (GIDMaPS) data sets. 2014

    2014

  10. [10]

    Babichev, S. A. and Ries, J. and Lvovsky, A. I. Quantum scissors: teleportation of single-mode optical states by means of a nonlocal single photon. 2002

    2002

  11. [11]

    and Buchalla, G

    Beneke, M. and Buchalla, G. and Dunietz, I. Mixing induced CP asymmetries in inclusive B decays. Phys. L ett. 1997. arXiv:0707.3168

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  12. [12]

    deep SIP : deep learning of S upernova I a P arameters

    Stahl, B. deep SIP : deep learning of S upernova I a P arameters. 2020. ascl:2006.023

    2020

  13. [13]

    Abbott, T. M. C. and others. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.123505. arXiv:1810.02499

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.123505 2019

  14. [14]

    Will, C. M. Theory and E xperiment in G ravitational P hysics. 2018. doi:10.1017/9781316338612

    work page doi:10.1017/9781316338612 2018

  15. [15]

    Extended Theories of Gravity , journal =

    Salvatore Capozziello and Mariafelicia. Extended Theories of Gravity , journal =. 2011 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.09.003 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2011.09.003 2011

  16. [16]

    Cai, Yi-Fu and Capozziello, Salvatore and De Laurentis, Mariafelicia and Saridakis, Emmanuel N , journal=. f (. 2016 , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/10/106901

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/10/106901 2016

  17. [17]

    , journal =

    Salvi, Leonardo and Poli, Nicola and Vuletic, Vladan and Tino, Guglielmo M. , journal =. Squeezing on. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.033601 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.033601 2018

  18. [18]

    and Bettadpur, Srinivas and Ries, John C

    Tapley, Byron D. and Bettadpur, Srinivas and Ries, John C. and Thompson, Paul F. and Watkins, Michael M. , title =. 2004 , doi =. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/305/5683/503.full.pdf , journal =

    2004

  19. [19]

    Mission design, operation and exploitation of the gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation explorer mission

    Floberghagen, Rune and Fehringer, Michael and Lamarre, Daniel and Muzi, Danilo and Frommknecht, Bj \"o rn and Steiger, Christoph and Pi \ n eiro, Juan and da Costa, Andrea. Mission design, operation and exploitation of the gravity field and steady-state ocean circulation explorer mission. Journal of Geodesy. 2011. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0498-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0498-3 2011

  20. [20]

    A spaceborne gravity gradiometer concept based on cold atom interferometers for measuring

    Carraz, Olivier and Siemes, Christian and Massotti, Luca and Haagmans, Roger and Silvestrin, Pierluigi , journal=. A spaceborne gravity gradiometer concept based on cold atom interferometers for measuring. 2014 , publisher=

    2014

  21. [21]

    and Gauguet, A

    L\'ev\`eque, T. and Gauguet, A. and Michaud, F. and Pereira Dos Santos, F. and Landragin, A. , journal =. Enhancing the. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.080405 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.080405 2009

  22. [23]

    Schleier-Smith, Monika Helene , title =

  23. [24]

    2013 , address =

    Cheiney, Pierrick , title =. 2013 , address =

    2013

  24. [25]

    Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , issn =

    Chapter 4 - Interaction between Atomic Ensembles and Optical Resonators: Classical Description , editor =. Advances in Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , issn =. 2011 , address =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385508-4.00004-8 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385508-4.00004-8 2011

  25. [26]

    , title =

    Tino, Guglielmo M. , title =. doi:10.3254/978-1-61499-448-0-457 , url =

    work page doi:10.3254/978-1-61499-448-0-457

  26. [27]

    and Rosi, G

    D'Amico, G. and Rosi, G. and Zhan, S. and Cacciapuoti, L. and Fattori, M. and Tino, G. M. , journal =. Canceling the. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.253201 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.253201 2017

  27. [28]

    , journal =

    Hu, Liang and Poli, Nicola and Salvi, Leonardo and Tino, Guglielmo M. , journal =. Atom. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.263601 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.263601 2017

  28. [29]

    2019 , month = Aug, publisher =

    Federica Migliaccio and Mirko Reguzzoni and Khulan Batsukh and Guglielmo Maria Tino and Gabriele Rosi and Fiodor Sorrentino and Carla Braitenberg and Tommaso Pivetta and Dora Francesca Barbolla and Simona Zoffoli , title =. 2019 , month = Aug, publisher =. doi:10.1007/s10712-019-09566-4 , url =

    work page doi:10.1007/s10712-019-09566-4 2019

  29. [30]

    Tino and Angelo Bassi and Giuseppe Bianco and Kai Bongs and Philippe Bouyer and Luigi Cacciapuoti and Salvatore Capozziello and Xuzong Chen and Maria L

    Guglielmo M. Tino and Angelo Bassi and Giuseppe Bianco and Kai Bongs and Philippe Bouyer and Luigi Cacciapuoti and Salvatore Capozziello and Xuzong Chen and Maria L. Chiofalo and Andrei Derevianko and Wolfgang Ertmer and Naceur Gaaloul and Patrick Gill and Peter W. Graham and Jason M. Hogan and Luciano Iess and Mark A. Kasevich and Hidetoshi Katori and Ca...

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/e2019-100324-6 2019

  30. [31]

    Classical and Quantum Gravity , abstract =

    Liang Hu and Enlong Wang and Leonardo Salvi and Jonathan N Tinsley and Guglielmo M Tino and Nicola Poli , title =. Classical and Quantum Gravity , abstract =. doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab4d18 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab4d18

  31. [32]

    Circumventing

    Roura, Albert , journal =. Circumventing. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.160401 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.160401 2017

  32. [33]

    R. W. P. Drever and J. L. Hall and F. V. Kowalski and J. Hough and G. M. Ford and A. J. Munley and H. Ward , title =. 1983 , month =. doi:10.1007/bf00702605 , url =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00702605 1983

  33. [34]

    Black , title =

    Eric D. Black , title =. 2001 , month =. doi:10.1119/1.1286663 , url =

    work page doi:10.1119/1.1286663 2001

  34. [35]

    and Bodart, Q

    Sorrentino, F. and Bodart, Q. and Cacciapuoti, L. and Lien, Y.-H. and Prevedelli, M. and Rosi, G. and Salvi, L. and Tino, G. M. , journal =. Sensitivity limits of a. 2014 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.89.023607 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.89.023607 2014

  35. [36]

    Peters, Achim , title =

  36. [37]

    D. S. Weiss and B. C. Young and S. Chu , title =. 1994 , month =. doi:10.1007/bf01081393 , url =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01081393 1994

  37. [38]

    Daniel A. Steck. Rubidium 87 D L ine D ata. 2019

    2019

  38. [39]

    The influence of transverse motion within an atomic gravimeter , journal =

    Anne Louchet-Chauvet and Tristan Farah and Quentin Bodart and Andr. The influence of transverse motion within an atomic gravimeter , journal =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/6/065025 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/13/6/065025 2011

  39. [40]

    Atom-wave diffraction between the

    M\"uller, Holger and Chiow, Sheng-wey and Chu, Steven , journal =. Atom-wave diffraction between the. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.77.023609 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.77.023609 2008

  40. [41]

    Estey, Brian Vincent , title =

  41. [42]

    M\"uller, Holger and Chiow, Sheng-wey and Long, Quan and Herrmann, Sven and Chu, Steven , journal =. Atom. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.180405 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.180405 2008

  42. [43]

    Szigeti and Onur Hosten and Simon A

    Stuart S. Szigeti and Onur Hosten and Simon A. Haine , journal =. Will quantum-enhanced atom interferometry ever be useful?. 2020 , month=

    2020

  43. [44]

    Schioppo and N

    M. Schioppo and N. Poli and M. Prevedelli and St. Falke and Ch. Lisdat and U. Sterr and G. M. Tino , title =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.4756936 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4756936 2012

  44. [45]

    2020 , month =

    Joep Assendelft , title =. 2020 , month =

    2020

  45. [46]

    2019 , url =

    Nichia , title =. 2019 , url =

    2019

  46. [47]

    2013 , url =

    Hamamatsu , title =. 2013 , url =

    2013

  47. [48]

    Salvi, Leonardo , title =

  48. [49]

    Method for the differential measurement of phase shifts induced by atoms in an optical ring cavity , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.103.022609 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.103.022609 2021

  49. [50]

    Wang, Enlong , title =

  50. [51]

    2022 , month =

    Joep Assendelft , title =. 2022 , month =

    2022

  51. [52]

    Tarallo, Marco Giacinto , title =

  52. [53]

    Boyd , title =

    Martin M. Boyd , title =. 2007 , month =

    2007

  53. [54]

    2021 , month =

    Graham Greve , title =. 2021 , month =

    2021

  54. [55]

    and Young, Dylan J

    Muniz, Juan A. and Young, Dylan J. and Cline, Julia R. K. and Thompson, James K. , journal =. Cavity-. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.023152 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.023152 2021

  55. [56]

    Tarallo, M. G. and Poli, N. and Schioppo, M. and Sutyrin, D. and Tino, G. M. , volume=. A high-stability semiconductor laser system for a ^. Applied Physics B , publisher=. 2010 , month=. doi:10.1007/s00340-010-4232-2 , number=

    work page doi:10.1007/s00340-010-4232-2 2010

  56. [57]

    Laser-noise-induced heating in far-off resonance optical traps , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 1997 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.56.R1095 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.56.r1095 1997

  57. [58]

    Dynamics of noise-induced heating in atom traps , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 1998 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.58.3914 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.58.3914 1998

  58. [59]

    Laser cooling by sawtooth-wave adiabatic passage , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.98.023404 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.98.023404 2018

  59. [60]

    Sawtooth-wave adiabatic passage in a magneto-optical trap , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.101.053434 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.101.053434 2020

  60. [61]

    Fast and dense magneto-optical traps for strontium , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.99.063421 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.99.063421 2019

  61. [62]

    Active cancellation of acoustical resonances with an

    Ryou, Albert and Simon, Jonathan , volume=. Active cancellation of acoustical resonances with an. Review of Scientific Instruments , publisher=. 2017 , month=. doi:10.1063/1.4973470 , number=

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4973470 2017

  62. [63]

    and Oberthaler, Markus K

    Stroescu, Ion and Hume, David B. and Oberthaler, Markus K. , journal =. Double-well atom trap for fluorescence detection at the. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.91.013412 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.91.013412 2015

  63. [64]

    Foot, C. J. , publisher =. Atomic. 2004 , address =

    2004

  64. [65]

    Laser C ooling and T rapping

    Metcalf, Harold J and Van Der Straten, Peter. Laser C ooling and T rapping

  65. [66]

    Steck, D. A. Classical and M odern O ptics

  66. [67]

    Stellmer, Simon , title =

  67. [68]

    Sansonetti, J. E. and Nave, G. , title =. 2010 , month = sep, publisher =. doi:10.1063/1.3449176 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3449176 2010

  68. [69]

    and Cancio, P

    Ferrari, G. and Cancio, P. and Drullinger, R. and Giusfredi, G. and Poli, N. and Prevedelli, M. and Toninelli, C. and Tino, G. M. , journal =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.243002 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.243002 2003

  69. [70]

    Accuracy evaluation of an optical lattice clock with bosonic atoms , volume =

    Xavier Baillard and Mathilde Fouch\'. Accuracy evaluation of an optical lattice clock with bosonic atoms , volume =. Opt. Lett. , keywords =. 2007 , url =

    2007

  70. [71]

    doi:10.1088/0026-1394/45/5/008 , url =

    Gretchen K Campbell and Andrew D Ludlow and Sebastian Blatt and Jan W Thomsen and Michael J Martin and Marcio H G de Miranda and Tanya Zelevinsky and Martin M Boyd and Jun Ye and Scott A Diddams and Thomas P Heavner and Thomas E Parker and Steven R Jefferts , title =. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/45/5/008 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/0026-1394/45/5/008

  71. [72]

    Courtillot and A

    I. Courtillot and A. Quessada-Vial and A. Brusch and D. Kolker and G. D. Rovera and P. Lemonde , title =. 2005 , month = may, publisher =. doi:10.1140/epjd/e2005-00058-0 , url =

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/e2005-00058-0 2005

  72. [73]

    Kramida and

    A. Kramida and. 2021 , url =

    2021

  73. [74]

    K. J. Ross and B. Sonntag , doi =. High temperature metal atom beam sources , journal =. 1995 , month = sep, publisher =

    1995

  74. [75]

    Moore and T.J

    L.J. Moore and T.J. Murphy and I.L. Barnes and P.J. Paulsen , title =. 1982 , month = jan, publisher =. doi:10.6028/jres.087.001 , url =

    work page doi:10.6028/jres.087.001 1982

  75. [76]

    de Laeter and John Karl B\"

    John R. de Laeter and John Karl B\". Atomic weights of the elements. 2003 , month = jan, publisher =. doi:10.1351/pac200375060683 , url =

    work page doi:10.1351/pac200375060683 2003

  76. [77]

    Atomic masses of strontium and ytterbium , author =. Phys. Rev. A , volume =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.86.050502 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.86.050502 2012

  77. [78]

    The E lements

    Emsley, John. The E lements

  78. [79]

    Exploring the

    Serge Haroche and Jean. Exploring the. 2006 , note =

    2006

  79. [80]

    Madjarov and Jacob P

    Ivaylo S. Madjarov and Jacob P. Covey and Adam L. Shaw and Joonhee Choi and Anant Kale and Alexandre Cooper and Hannes Pichler and Vladimir Schkolnik and Jason R. Williams and Manuel Endres , title =. 2020 , month = may, publisher =. doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0903-z , url =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0903-z 2020

  80. [81]

    2019 , month =

    Tobias Bothwell and Dhruv Kedar and Eric Oelker and John M Robinson and Sarah L Bromley and Weston L Tew and Jun Ye and Colin J Kennedy , title =. 2019 , month =. doi:10.1088/1681-7575/ab4089 , url =

    work page doi:10.1088/1681-7575/ab4089 2019

Showing first 80 references.