Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

How Do Large Language Models Understand Graph Patterns? A Benchmark for Graph Pattern Comprehension

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.05298 v2 pith:K6ROGVDD submitted 2024-10-04 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords graphllmsbenchmarkmodelspatternstasksunderstandpattern
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Benchmarking the capabilities and limitations of large language models (LLMs) in graph-related tasks is becoming an increasingly popular and crucial area of research. Recent studies have shown that LLMs exhibit a preliminary ability to understand graph structures and node features. However, the potential of LLMs in graph pattern mining remains largely unexplored. This is a key component in fields such as computational chemistry, biology, and social network analysis. To bridge this gap, this work introduces a comprehensive benchmark to assess LLMs' capabilities in graph pattern tasks. We have developed a benchmark that evaluates whether LLMs can understand graph patterns based on either terminological or topological descriptions. Additionally, our benchmark tests the LLMs' capacity to autonomously discover graph patterns from data. The benchmark encompasses both synthetic and real datasets, and a variety of models, with a total of 11 tasks and 7 models. Our experimental framework is designed for easy expansion to accommodate new models and datasets. Our findings reveal that: (1) LLMs have preliminary abilities to understand graph patterns, with O1-mini outperforming in the majority of tasks; (2) Formatting input data to align with the knowledge acquired during pretraining can enhance performance; (3) The strategies employed by LLMs may differ from those used in conventional algorithms.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CS-Agent: LLM-based Community Search via Dual-agent Collaboration

    cs.SI 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    CS-Agent, a Solver-Validator two-agent dialogue with a Decider selector, improves LLM community search on synthetic graphs, and GraphCS is a new benchmark for measuring it.

Pith tools