Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 35 references

Vortex lattice states of bilayer electron-hole fluids in quantizing magnetic fields

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that a weakly charged electron-hole bilayer in a strong magnetic field forms a honeycomb lattice of fractionally charged vortices and antivortices, and predicts an experimentally accessible vortex-delocalization transition.

desk verdict A genuinely new honeycomb vortex-antivortex lattice for charged exciton condensates, with a melting-filling estimate that doesn't follow from the paper's own J/U numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08810 v2 pith:KI4XOPQM submitted 2024-11-13 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-el

Bo Zou , Allan H. MacDonald This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-el
keywords excitoncondensatevortexlatticeelectron-holebilayerquantumHallregimecounterflowsuperfluidityfractionalchargeHartree-FockLandaulevels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that when a small net charge density is added to a two-dimensional electron-hole bilayer in a strong perpendicular magnetic field, the ground state is not a uniform condensate or a Wigner crystal of unit charges but a broken-translation-symmetry honeycomb lattice of vortices and antivortices in the interlayer pairing field. Each vortex and antivortex carries a fractional charge of the same sign but unequal magnitude, together contributing one elementary charge per unit cell. The vorticity and charge are locked through the same mechanism that produces skyrmion and meron textures in quantum Hall ferromagnets, and the lattice differs from the triangular Abrikosov vortex lattice of superconductors. The paper further predicts that as the charge density is increased or the magnetic field weakened, the vortex lattice undergoes a delocalization transition that would be observed as an abrupt increase in counterflow transport resistance. The result matters because it gives a concrete, testable ground-state candidate for the electrically tunable exciton condensates now realized in double-layer semiconductor devices.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is a Landau-level-based unrestricted Hartree-Fock calculation that exploits the analyticity of the Landau-level wavefunctions to write the full density matrix and Fock potentials in terms of the Fourier components of the local charge density, making broken-translation-symmetry solutions tractable. The output is a real-space pattern of interlayer coherence whose phase winds by $+2\pi/3$ and $-2\pi/3$ around neighboring sites, forming the honeycomb vortex-antivortex lattice. To incorporate quantum fluctuations, the paper maps this mean-field state onto a Bose-Hubbard model on a triangular lattice with an emergent gauge field that assigns alternating fluxes $\pm 1$ to elementary triangles; this gauge structure shifts the exciton band minimum to the $K$ or $K'$ points of the Brillouin zone. The ratio of Josephson coupling to on-site repulsion is found to be $J/U\simeq 10^{-2}$ and independent of charge density, which controls the superfluid-to-Mott melting boundary.

What would settle it

A counterflow transport measurement that shows a smooth, continuous increase in resistance with charge density—without an abrupt jump—would falsify the predicted vortex-delocalization transition; likewise, a numerical search allowing arbitrary unit-cell sizes that finds a lower-energy stripe or bubble state at the claimed parameters would falsify the ground-state honeycomb lattice.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The discovery is a microscopic mean-field state: in a strong magnetic field, a charged electron-hole bilayer condenses into an exciton superfluid whose order parameter develops interpenetrating honeycomb lattices of phase vortices and antivortices. The vorticity cores carry fractional charge, with the vortex and antivortex charges summing to one elementary charge per unit cell, so the state simultaneously breaks translation symmetry and exhibits charge fractionalization. In contrast to Abrikosov vortex lattices, where vorticity is imposed by an external field, here the total vorticity vanishes because the number of vortices equals the number of antivortices, and it is the charge density that stabilizes the lattice by making vortex-antivortex annihilation energetically costly. The paper also finds that the vortex-lattice state is a counterflow superfluid whose melting at larger charge density or weaker field is a vortex-delocalization transition, detectable as an abrupt rise in counterflow resistance.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation searches only over periodic lattice states with exactly one elementary charge per unit cell, so it cannot rule out lower-energy states with larger unit cells, such as stripes, bubbles, or trion lattices.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The honeycomb vortex lattice replaces the Wigner crystal as the expected ground state of a weakly charged electron-hole fluid in a strong field, so experiments that see magnetic oscillations or drag anomalies should be reinterpreted in terms of this broken-symmetry superfluid.
  • Increasing charge density or reducing magnetic field drives a vortex delocalization transition that should appear as an abrupt jump in counterflow resistance, a direct experimental signature.
  • Tuning the effective gap makes the vortex lattice evolve continuously into a triangular Wigner crystal of electrons or holes, so the two ordered states are connected by a structural crossover rather than a sharp boundary.
  • The alternating-flux Bose-Hubbard description implies that the vortex lattice exists only for small charge imbalance and melts when $J/U$ falls below $\sim \langle n_i \rangle^{-1}$, giving a quantitative criterion for where to search in experiments.
  • The same state should appear in graphene electron-electron double layers near total filling factor one, where the required magnetic field scale is much smaller, and in TMD double layers at very high fields.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension, not discussed in the paper, would be to look for the fractional charges themselves, for example through local compressibility measurements at the vortex cores; the charge fractionalization is a direct corollary of the phase winding.
  • Because the vortex lattice and Wigner crystal share the same lattice constant, diffraction alone cannot distinguish them; the discriminating observable is interlayer coherence, so counterflow supercurrent and its dissipation are the key measurements, not structural probes.
  • The Bose-Hubbard mapping suggests that the melted vortex fluid could, at fractional boson fillings, become a bosonic fractional quantum Hall state of excitons in the alternating-flux lattice; probing this would require going beyond the paper's mean-field and single-band analysis.
  • If the vortex delocalization transition is first order, hysteresis in counterflow resistance as the gate voltage is swept should be observable; this is an experimentally testable consequence of the paper's model that the paper leaves implicit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies a bilayer electron-hole fluid in a strong perpendicular magnetic field with a small net charge density (filling factor νc). Using unrestricted Hartree-Fock calculations in a Landau-level basis, the authors find that the ground state is a honeycomb lattice of interpenetrating vortices and antivortices in the electron-hole-pair field, with fractional charges of equal sign but unequal magnitude. They contrast this with the triangular vortex lattice of type-II superconductors. The paper further estimates quantum melting by mapping the condensate to a Bose-Hubbard model with an emergent gauge field, and predicts that increasing charge density or decreasing magnetic field produces a vortex-delocalization transition observable as an abrupt increase in counterflow transport resistance. A schematic phase diagram and supporting Hartree-Fock details are provided in the main text and supplement.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper identifies a qualitatively new broken-symmetry state: a vortex-antivortex lattice in an exciton condensate, with implications for transport experiments in bilayer semiconductors and graphene-based systems. The manuscript has substantial strengths: the unrestricted Hartree-Fock calculation is a legitimate variational method; the honeycomb solution is explicitly compared with uniform and square solutions and reported lower in energy; the stiffness-based estimate of the Josephson coupling (Eq. S33) is a concrete, non-fitted input; and the predicted counterflow-transport signature is falsifiable. However, the ground-state claim is restricted by the imposed one-charge-per-unit-cell periodicity, and the quantitative melting prediction contains an internal inconsistency that undermines the headline experimental prediction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Quantum Fluctuations and Quantum Melting] The melting estimate is internally inconsistent. The text states J/U ∼ 10^-2 independent of νc, then uses the criterion 'J/U is larger than ∼ ⟨ni⟩^-1 ∼ |νc|' to conclude that the critical charge filling factor is 'around 0.1'. These statements together imply |νc| ≲ 10^-2, not 0.1. Using the exact mean-field superfluid–Mott boundary at integer filling n, (J/U)_c = z^{-1}(√(n+1) − √n)^2 ≈ (4zn)^{-1}, with honeycomb coordination z = 3 and J/U = 10^-2, gives n* ≈ 8, i.e. νc* ≈ νex/8. Reaching νc* = 0.1 would require νex ≈ 0.8, which is not established for the parameters ΔE = 0.1 Ry, B = 0.1B0 quoted in the paper. The predicted melting filling and the counterflow-transport signature therefore need revision or a direct microscopic calculation of the superfluid–insulator boundary.
  2. [Supplementary Material, Broken Translational Symmetry] The variational search is restricted to periodic broken-symmetry states with exactly one elementary charge per unit cell. The supplement states: 'The vortex lattice solutions we find at small finite νc ... restrict q to a reciprocal lattice corresponding to one charge per unit cell.' The additional sentence 'We can find solutions for any lattice type' refers to lattice geometries within this same periodicity. Lower-energy states with larger unit cells—such as stripes, bubbles, or lattices of trions—are not ruled out. Since the central claim is that the honeycomb vortex lattice is the ground state, this restriction is load-bearing. The claim should be qualified to one-charge-per-unit-cell periodic states, or the search should be extended.
  3. [Quantum Fluctuations and Quantum Melting] The estimate of the on-site interaction U relies on the relation (U Aex)^{-1} = −E'', with Aex described only as 'expected to be smaller than but close to Auc'. The value of Aex is not computed, and the resulting J/U ∼ 10^-2 therefore carries an unquantified factor. Because the melting criterion depends directly on J/U, this uncertainty should be acknowledged and, ideally, bounded by a microscopic estimate of Aex.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'Brillion zone' should be 'Brillouin zone', 'matirx' should be 'matrix', 'distinquishes' should be 'distinguishes', 'possibile' should be 'possible', and 'consensate' should be 'condensate'.
  2. [Fig. 4] The phase diagram's solid boundaries are computed only for νc = 0.1 and d = aB, but the caption and text describe the diagram for 'small positive charge filling factors'. It would be helpful to state explicitly which boundaries are expected to be weakly dependent on νc and which are not.
  3. [Supplementary Material, Eq. S30] In the dispersion EQ = −2J Σ_i cos(Q·a_i + A(a_i)), the notation A(a_i) should be defined more clearly in relation to the link phases Aij introduced in Eq. (1) of the main text, particularly for readers who do not see the geometric correspondence immediately.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the vortex-lattice ground state is obtained by direct Hartree-Fock energy minimization, and the melting estimate uses independently computed Bose-Hubbard parameters combined with an external phase diagram.

full rationale

None of the paper's load-bearing claims reduces to its own inputs by construction. The central ground-state claim, that a weakly charged electron-hole fluid in a strong field forms a honeycomb vortex-antivortex lattice, is obtained by unrestricted periodic Hartree-Fock calculations that explicitly compare honeycomb, square, and uniform-density solutions and report the honeycomb state lowest in energy; it is not fitted to any experimental constant and does not rest on a self-citation. The fractional charges and the one-charge-per-unit-cell relation are outputs of the converged density matrices rather than imposed definitions. The Bose-Hubbard model used for the melting estimate is not circular: U is read from the HF ground-state curvature via (U Aex)^-1 = -E'', J is fixed by matching the lattice-model band curvature to a separately computed continuum stiffness in Eq. S33, and the superfluid-to-insulator criterion is taken from the external Fisher et al. result. Prior work by the same authors is cited for the neutral-condensate background, Landau-level analyticity, and earlier Wigner-crystal or charged-complex results, but none of these citations supplies the vortex-lattice result or forbids alternative states; the honeycomb choice is justified by the HF calculation itself. A separate quantitative concern exists: the stated J/U ~ 10^-2 combined with the Bose-Hubbard criterion J/U ~ 1/<n_i> would naively give a critical filling closer to 10^-2 than the quoted 0.1, but that is an internal consistency issue, not a circular reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The calculation relies on standard Landau-level Hartree-Fock machinery plus domain assumptions of full spin polarization, equal masses, strong-field truncation, and large gate distance. The broken-symmetry search is restricted to periodic states with one charge per unit cell. The Bose-Hubbard parameters are derived from the same mean-field state, making the melting estimate partially self-referential. No new fundamental forces or particles are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Effective condensate site area Aex = approximated as Auc = A_Phi / |nu_c|
    The on-site interaction U is estimated as -1/(E'' Aex), and Aex is assumed to be 'smaller than but close to Auc'. The J/U ratio and the predicted melting density depend on this estimate.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Both electron and hole layers are fully spin polarized
    Stated in the Introduction: 'we also assume that both electrons and holes are fully spin-polarized'.
  • domain assumption Electron and hole effective masses are equal
    Stated: 'taking electron and hole masses m* to be equal for definiteness'.
  • domain assumption Hilbert space truncation to a finite number of Landau levels
    The calculation assumes a strong magnetic field and truncates both electron and hole Hilbert spaces; convergence in the Landau level cutoff is not demonstrated.
  • ad hoc to paper Broken-symmetry search restricted to periodic states with one elementary charge per unit cell
    The supplementary material states density-matrix Fourier components are restricted to a reciprocal lattice corresponding to one charge per unit cell; larger unit cells are not considered.
  • ad hoc to paper Bose-Hubbard model parameters U and J estimated from the same mean-field state capture quantum melting
    The quantum fluctuation analysis uses U from the E'' curvature and J from the stiffness of the continuum model, both derived from the same HF solutions. The quantitative J/U estimate appears inconsistent with the claimed critical filling.
  • domain assumption Gate screening can be neglected by taking gate distance dg large
    In the supplementary material: 'we assume that dg is large enough that these can be neglected'.
invented entities (2)
  • Fractionally charged vortex and antivortex quasiparticles in the exciton condensate independent evidence
    purpose: Carry the excess charge density as topological defects in the electron-hole pair field and form the honeycomb lattice.
    The paper provides falsifiable handles: a predicted honeycomb spatial pattern that could be imaged by scanning tunneling microscopy and a counterflow depinning or melting signature in transport.
  • Emergent gauge field Aij in the Bose-Hubbard model
    purpose: Mimics the phase differences between condensate sites induced by vortices and antivortices, producing alternating fluxes in the effective triangular plaquettes.
    This is an effective modeling device constructed to reproduce the Hartree-Fock phase pattern, not a new physical field with direct external evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vortex lattice states of bilayer electron-hole fluids in quantizing magnetic fields." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KI4XOPQM

@misc{pith2026241108810,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vortex lattice states of bilayer electron-hole fluids in quantizing magnetic fields},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KI4XOPQM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08810}
}
read the original abstract

We show that the ground state of a weakly charged two-dimensional electron-hole fluid in a strong magnetic field is a broken translation symmetry state with interpenetrating lattices of localized vortices and antivortices in the electron-hole-pair field. The vortices and antivortices carry fractional charges of equal sign but unequal magnitude and have a honeycomb lattice structure that contrasts with the triangular lattices of superconducting electron-electron-pair vortex lattices. We predict that increasing charge density or weakening magnetic field drives a vortex delocalization transition that would be signaled experimentally by an abrupt increase in counterflow transport resistance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08810 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Schematic illustration of the vortex lattice mean-field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Honeycomb-lattice exciton vortex lattice states at magnetic field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (a)Ground state energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic phase diagram of a charged electron-hole [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L. Ma, P. X. Nguyen, Z. Wang, Y. Zeng, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Strongly correlated excitonic insulator in atomic double layers, Nature 598, 585 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    J. Gu, L. Ma, S. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. C. Hone, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Dipolar excitonic insulator in a moir´ e lattice, Nature Physics18, 395 (2022)

    2022

  3. [3]

    P. X. Nguyen, L. Ma, R. Chaturvedi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Perfect coulomb drag in a dipolar excitonic insulator, Science 388, 274 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, R. Dery, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Exciton density waves in coulomb-coupled dual moir´ e lattices, Nature Materials 22, 175 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    R. Qi, A. Y. Joe, Z. Zhang, J. Xie, Q. Feng, Z. Lu, Z. Wang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, et al., Perfect coulomb drag and exciton transport in an exci- tonic insulator, Science 388, 278 (2025)

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    R. Qi, A. Y. Joe, Z. Zhang, Y. Zeng, T. Zheng, Q. Feng, J. Xie, E. Regan, Z. Lu, T. Taniguchi, et al., Thermody- namic behavior of correlated electron-hole fluids in van der waals heterostructures, Nature communications 14, 8264 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    P. X. Nguyen, R. Chaturvedi, B. Zou, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Quantum oscillations in a dipolar excitonic insulator, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17829 (2025)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    R. Qi, Q. Li, Z. Zhang, Z. Cui, B. Zou, H. Kim, C. San- born, S. Chen, J. Xie, T. Taniguchi, et al., Compe- tition between excitonic insulators and quantum hall states in correlated electron-hole bilayers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.18168 (2025)

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Xie and A

    M. Xie and A. H. MacDonald, Electrical reservoirs for bilayer excitons, Physical review letters 121, 067702 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Zeng and A

    Y. Zeng and A. MacDonald, Electrically controlled two- dimensional electron-hole fluids, Physical Review B 102, 085154 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    B. Zou, Y. Zeng, A. H. MacDonald, and A. Strashko, Electrical control of two-dimensional electron-hole flu- ids in the quantum hall regime, Physical Review B 109, 085416 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    A. A. Abrikosov, Nobel lecture: Type-ii superconductors and the vortex lattice, Reviews of modern physics 76, 975 (2004)

    2004

  5. [13]

    A. L. Fetter, Rotating trapped bose-einstein condensates, Reviews of Modern Physics 81, 647 (2009)

    2009

  6. [14]

    Zhang, Vortex-antivortex lattice in superfluid films, Physical review letters 71, 2142 (1993)

    S.-C. Zhang, Vortex-antivortex lattice in superfluid films, Physical review letters 71, 2142 (1993)

    1993

  7. [15]

    Botelho and C

    S. Botelho and C. S´ a de Melo, Vortex-antivortex lattice in ultracold fermionic gases, Physical review letters 96, 040404 (2006)

    2006

  8. [16]

    Hivet, E

    R. Hivet, E. Cancellieri, T. Boulier, D. Ballarini, D. San- vitto, F. M. Marchetti, M. Szymanska, C. Ciuti, E. Gi- acobino, and A. Bramati, Interaction-shaped vortex- antivortex lattices in polariton fluids, Physical Review B 89, 134501 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Miloˇ sevi´ c and F

    M. Miloˇ sevi´ c and F. Peeters, Vortex-antivortex lattices in superconducting films with magnetic pinning arrays, Physical review letters 93, 267006 (2004)

    2004

  10. [18]

    S. L. Sondhi, A. Karlhede, S. Kivelson, and E. Rezayi, Skyrmions and the crossover from the integer to frac- tional quantum hall effect at small zeeman energies, Physical Review B 47, 16419 (1993)

    1993

  11. [19]

    L. Brey, H. Fertig, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and A. MacDonald, Skyrme crystal in a two-dimensional electron gas, Physical review letters 75, 2562 (1995)

    1995

  12. [20]

    K. Yang, K. Moon, L. Zheng, A. MacDonald, S. Girvin, D. Yoshioka, and S.-C. Zhang, Quantum ferromagnetism and phase transitions in double-layer quantum hall sys- tems, Physical review letters 72, 732 (1994)

    1994

  13. [21]

    K. Moon, H. Mori, K. Yang, S. Girvin, A. MacDon- ald, L. Zheng, D. Yoshioka, and S.-C. Zhang, Sponta- neous interlayer coherence in double-layer quantum hall systems: Charged vortices and kosterlitz-thouless phase transitions, Physical Review B 51, 5138 (1995)

    1995

  14. [22]

    K. Yang, K. Moon, L. Belkhir, H. Mori, S. Girvin, A. MacDonald, L. Zheng, and D. Yoshioka, Spontaneous 6 interlayer coherence in double-layer quantum hall sys- tems: Symmetry-breaking interactions, in-plane fields, and phase solitons, Physical Review B 54, 11644 (1996)

    1996

  15. [23]

    See supplementary material

  16. [24]

    In addition to the honeycomb lattice solutions, we also find square vortex lattice solutions of the Hartree-Fock equations, but their energies are higher and we do not discuss them here

  17. [25]

    For transition metal dichalcogenide (TMD) bilayers en- capsulated by hexagonal boron nitride (hBN), aB ≈ 1.3nm, Ry ≈ 0.11eV, and B0 ≈ 2.4 × 103T, whereas for GaAs quantum well systems, which have smaller masses and larger dielectric constants, the corresponding scales are appr...

  18. [26]

    For brevity, we use vortices to refer to all the vortex and antivortex objects where it does not cause ambiguity

  19. [27]

    Changing the sign of the magnetic field reverses the vor- ticity for a given sign of charge; in this letter we as- sume that the magnetic field is in the + z direction, i.e., B = Bz > 0

  20. [28]

    These quasiparticles have the same charge as electrons and will form Wigner crystals with the same period

    By hole Wigner crystals, on the electron doping side (νc > 0), we refer to the crystal formed by orbitals unoc- cupied by holes in the valence band Landau levels. These quasiparticles have the same charge as electrons and will form Wigner crystals with the same period. See Ref.[34]

  21. [29]

    M. P. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Boson localization and the superfluid-insulator transition, Physical Review B 40, 546 (1989)

    1989

  22. [30]

    Palacios, D

    J. Palacios, D. Yoshioka, and A. MacDonald, Long-lived charged multiple-exciton complexes in strong magnetic fields, Physical Review B 54, R2296 (1996)

    1996

  23. [31]

    J. Li, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Hone, and C. Dean, Excitonic superfluid phase in double bilayer graphene, Nature Physics 13, 751 (2017)

    2017

  24. [32]

    X. Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. I. Halperin, and P. Kim, Quantum hall drag of exciton condensate in graphene, Nature Physics 13, 746 (2017)

    2017

  25. [33]

    K. A. Lin, N. Prasad, G. W. Burg, B. Zou, K. Ueno, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. MacDonald, and E. Tutuc, Emergence of interlayer coherence in twist- controlled graphene double layers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 187701 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    MacDonald and D

    A. MacDonald and D. Murray, Broken symmetry states for two-dimensional electrons in a strong magnetic field, Physical Review B 32, 2291 (1985)

    1985

  27. [35]

    MacDonald and S

    A. MacDonald and S. Girvin, Density matrices for states in the lowest landau level of a two-dimensional electron gas, Physical Review B 38, 6295 (1988). 1 SUPPLEMENT AR Y MA TERIALS Device geometry and electrostatic potential The device geometry analyzed in the main text is sh...

    1988

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.