REVIEW 3 cited by
Search for Gravitational Waves from Primordial Black Hole Binary Coalescences in the Galactic Halo
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We use data from the second science run of the LIGO gravitational-wave detectors to search for the gravitational waves from primordial black hole (PBH) binary coalescence with component masses in the range 0.2--$1.0 M_\odot$. The analysis requires a signal to be found in the data from both LIGO observatories, according to a set of coincidence criteria. No inspiral signals were found. Assuming a spherical halo with core radius 5 kpc extending to 50 kpc containing non-spinning black holes with masses in the range 0.2--$1.0 M_\odot$, we place an observational upper limit on the rate of PBH coalescence of 63 per year per Milky Way halo (MWH) with 90% confidence.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
On Bimodality in the Eccentricity Distribution of Galactic Double Neutron Stars
A broken neutron-star remnant mass relation plus weak ultra-stripped supernova kicks can reproduce the apparent eccentricity gap in Galactic double neutron stars.
-
Template bank for sub solar mass compact binary mergers in the fourth observing run of Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo, and KAGRA
Two template banks for sub-solar-mass compact binary searches in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA's fourth observing run were generated with a modified manifold algorithm, and simulation tests show sufficient match coverage for masse...
-
Parameter Estimation on LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA O4a Binary Merger Triggers with Sub-solar Mass Components
Bayesian re-analysis of the seven LVK O4a sub-solar-mass triggers finds three that are compatible with a sub-solar-mass component, though none rises to detection significance.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.