Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 64 references

Control of single spin-flips in a Rydberg atomic fractal

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On a Sierpiński-gasket array of Rydberg atoms, excitations appear one spin flip at a time, each added spin delocalized over all equivalent sites of a sublattice — a control regular lattices cannot offer.

desk verdict Sublattice-resolved spin-flip cascade in a Rydberg fractal is real and nicely characterized, but the delocalized-superposition headline outruns the data: only populations are measured, and the symmetry-breaking disorder model strong enough to fit the experiment would localize the extra spin. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.03514 v1 pith:KLQ3NCL2 submitted 2025-09-03 cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.dis-nnquant-ph

Robin C. Verstraten , Ivo H. A. Knottnerus , Yu Chih Tseng , Alexander Urech , Tiago Santiago do Espirito Santo , Vinicius Zampronio , Florian Schreck , Robert J. C. Spreeuw
show 1 more author
Cristiane Morais Smith
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.dis-nnquant-ph PACS 67.85.-d
keywords SierpińskigasketRydbergatomstransverse-fieldIsingmodellong-rangevanderWaalsinteractionssinglespin-flipcontrolopticaltweezersquantumsimulationentanglemententropy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to show that a fractal lattice changes how a many-body spin system passes through its phases. On a Sierpiński gasket — a triangle of triangles with Hausdorff dimension 1.58 — Rydberg atoms interacting through long-range van der Waals forces flip their spins one by one as the detuning is raised, rather than jumping between ordered states. The new feature is where each added spin goes: it delocalizes into a superposition over all equivalent sites of one sublattice (corners first, then edge, then bulk sites), so a single collective excitation can be addressed as a sublattice property. The authors support this with exact diagonalization, variational mean field, quantum Monte Carlo, a new symmetry-reduction solver, and direct imaging of 88Sr atoms arranged in the gasket, and argue that the effect is absent in regular lattices, where all sites are equivalent. If the claim holds, the fractal's geometry offers stepwise experimental control of a cascade of single-spin-flip phase transitions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing structure is the Sierpiński gasket's sublattice hierarchy, defined by connectivity: corner sites have one neighbor, edge sites two, bulk sites three, and the sublattices hold unequal numbers of sites. The long-range van der Waals interaction V(r)=C6/r6 orders the filling by sublattice — corners first to minimize repulsion, then edge, then bulk — while the transverse field Ω turns the energetically degenerate classical configurations into symmetric superpositions over the equivalent sites of the active sublattice. The Rydberg blockade radius Rb=a(V/Ω)^{1/6} sets the competition between interaction and spin-flip drive. The paper's new solver, SIM-GRAPH, computes the automorphi

What would settle it

Image single experimental shots in the 4-spin-up plateau and tally which edge site carries the fourth excitation: the superposition claim requires the fourth spin to appear on all three edge sites with symmetric probabilities. The same apparatus can test the symmetry dependence directly — displacing one corner outward by more than about 10% of the lattice spacing should localize the fourth spin and narrow or eliminate the plateau, exactly as the paper's disorder model predicts.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the quantum regime, the ground state of a long-range-interacting Ising model on a first-generation Sierpiński gasket has stable phases with exactly four and five spin-up excitations, the added spins being delocalized over all equivalent edge sites. Classically the fourth spin sits on one random edge site; with a transverse field it spreads into a symmetric superposition over the three edge sites, and the five-spin-up phase carries two extra spins in superposition. Magnetization, spin susceptibility, entanglement entropy, and real- and reciprocal-space correlations all show the same one-by-one cascade, and experiments with single 88Sr atoms in optical tweezers reproduce the predicted phase

Load-bearing premise

The delocalization claim rests on the prepared state being the true ground state after a few-microsecond sweep and on the three edge (and later bulk) sites remaining equivalent; the paper itself reports that trap deformations and hologram rounding break this threefold symmetry, and that the measured asymmetry is reproduced only after adding 1% position disorder and a 10% outward displacement of one site.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The 4- and 5-spin-up phases are stable, addressable superposition states, so the first-generation gasket's full 0→9 excitation cascade can be stepped through one spin flip at a time by tuning Δ/Ω and V.
  • Which sublattice is activated — corner, edge, or bulk — is set by the interaction range and the applied fields, so the same array can be programmed to probe a chosen sublattice.
  • The cascade is not a nine-site accident: SIM-GRAPH finds the same one-by-one plateaus (6 ≤ ⟨n↑⟩ ≤ 15) in the 24-site second generation and repeats the pattern in the third, so larger gaskets should show it too.
  • The structure factor carries a distinct reciprocal-space fingerprint for each sublattice's length scale, giving an experimental signature that works even though fractals lack translational symmetry.
  • The authors identify quantum sensing and quantum information processing as the practical beneficiaries of controllable single spin-flips in a many-body system.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The superposition's fragility is itself a tool: because 1% position disorder measurably localizes the fourth spin, single-shot statistics over edge sites could serve as an in-situ calibration of array symmetry — a metrology use the paper does not state.
  • If the sublattice-filling mechanism is generic, other fractals with imbalanced sublattices, such as the Sierpiński carpet or the dual triangular gasket, should show analogous one-by-one cascades; a direct numerical run would settle whether the corner-edge-bulk ordering is universal.
  • Should the transverse-field criticality on the gasket admit a free-fermion description, the one-by-one spin cascade would be the occupation-space staircase of a single-particle spectrum — a concrete route toward the Majorana connection the authors list only as an outlook.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the transverse-field Ising model with long-range van der Waals interactions on a first-generation Sierpiński gasket (9 sites) and higher generations, combining exact diagonalization, variational mean-field, quantum Monte Carlo, and a symmetry-based SIM-GRAPH method. The central claim is that, in the quantum regime, the ground state exhibits phases in which spin flips occur one by one and the added spin is not localized on a single site but delocalized in a superposition over equivalent sublattice sites (e.g., four spin-ups with the fourth spin coherently spread over three edge sites). The authors support this with exact-diagonalization phase diagrams and with experimental measurements on 88Sr atoms in optical tweezers, reporting good agreement after including positional disorder and a site-4 defect in the theoretical model.

Significance. If established, the result would be significant: it would demonstrate that fractal geometry combined with long-range interactions can produce stable, sublattice-selective many-body states with one-by-one spin-flip cascades, and that such states are accessible in a Rydberg-atom simulator. The paper has notable strengths: exact diagonalization on the 9-site system is exact; the second-generation results are cross-checked with VMF and QMC; the experimental methods are described in exceptional detail, including laser noise characterization, pulse-shape calibration, and SPAM corrections; and the code and data availability statements are explicit. However, the central 'delocalized superposition' claim is not directly certified by the experimental data, and the paper's own disorder/defect model introduces symmetry-breaking terms that are large enough to threaten the superposition interpretation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Main text, 'Comparison between theory and experiments'] The statement that 'the additional spin up remains in a superposition and the quantum state is not destroyed' is not supported by the reported measurements. The experimental confirmation consists exclusively of site-resolved excitation probabilities P_i[↑]. Such populations cannot distinguish a coherent superposition from a classical mixture or from a localized state. The theoretical superposition is a property of the ED ground state of the ideal 9-site Hamiltonian, but no coherence witness (e.g., parity oscillations, off-diagonal density-matrix elements, or entanglement entropy extracted from the many-body state) is measured. The manuscript should either explicitly restrict the superposition claim to the ideal theoretical model and describe the experimental confirmation as population-level agreement, or provide a coherence-sensitive measurement or a quantitative estimate of the coherenc
  2. [Methods, 'Disorder and defects'; Extended Data Fig. 4] The model used to reproduce the experimental asymmetry includes 1% Gaussian positional disorder and a 10% outward displacement of site 4. For V = 110 Ω and V ∝ r^{-6}, a 10% displacement changes the nearest-neighbor interaction by roughly 60%, i.e., about 66 Ω, far exceeding the transverse field Ω that generates the superposition. This is not a perturbative symmetry breaking. The paper asserts that the superposition 'remains robust, with an asymmetric amplitude,' but no calculation of the one-body density matrix coherences (or any other off-diagonal observable) under this disorder/defect model is provided. Without such a calculation, the claim that the experimentally realized state retains coherent delocalization rather than localizing or becoming a mixture is unsubstantiated. The authors should compute and report the off-diagonal elements of the reduced single-particle density matrix in
  3. [Methods, 'SIM-GRAPH'; Extended Data Fig. 3] The paper's own benchmark shows that SIM-GRAPH fails to identify the 4- and 5-spin-up superposition phases for the first-generation gasket, compressing them into a narrow transition region (Extended Data Fig. 3b). For the second-generation system, the phase diagram in Fig. 3a is computed mainly with SIM-GRAPH, and the text claims that the ⟨n↑⟩=7 state contains 'four spins in a superposition on twelve sites along the inner edge.' Since SIM-GRAPH's projection assumes symmetric sites are occupied equally and is acknowledged to miss superposition states at phase boundaries, the higher-generation delocalization claim rests on a method whose central limitation is the very phenomenon being claimed. The authors should provide an ED or QMC calculation of the relevant off-diagonal correlations at the specific parameters for the second-generation ⟨n↑⟩=7 state, or clearly label this prediction as a
  4. [Main text, 'Higher-generation fractals'] The text states that the ⟨n↑⟩=12 plateau predicted by SIM-GRAPH is 'metastable' and that the other methods show the true ground state is missed by SIM-GRAPH. This is an honest and important caveat, but it also means that SIM-GRAPH can produce a stable phase that is not the ground state. This strengthens the need for the previous comment: for every higher-generation superposition claim not independently checked with ED/QMC, the possibility of a similar artifact must be explicitly addressed, not only for the ⟨n↑⟩=12 plateau but for the ⟨n↑⟩=7 state as well.
minor comments (5)
  1. [General notation] The magnetization is defined as ⟨m⟩ = (⟨n↑⟩ − ⟨n↓⟩)/N = (2⟨n↑⟩ − N)/N, but in several places the text refers to '⟨n↑⟩ = 4,5' as if it were the number of spin-ups. This is clear from context but should be made consistent, e.g., by defining n↑ explicitly as the total number of Rydberg excitations.
  2. [Fig. 2 caption] The caption lists parameter values 'Δ/Ω = -4.5, 4.1, 10, 15, 21.8 with V = 110 Ω' but the first value is negative and corresponds to the zero-spin-up phase. Since the text says the first cross is outside the shown phase diagram, a sentence clarifying the negative-detuning point would help the reader.
  3. [Methods, 'SPAM Correction Procedure'] The notation P⃗ = (P1, P0) and M = ((1−εp, εn),(εp, 1−εn)) is slightly confusing because the order of the vector entries is not defined in the text. Please specify that P1 corresponds to the detected 'Rydberg-excited' (absent) outcome and P0 to the 'ground' (present) outcome, or vice versa.
  4. [Abstract and main text] The phrase 'unprecedented control of a cascade of phase transitions' is strong. Given the limitations on the superposition claim discussed above, the authors may wish to temper 'control' to 'access' or 'observe' in the abstract, or to clearly distinguish the theoretical cascade from the experimentally demonstrated population changes.
  5. [References] Reference [22] is a footnote-like comment on the Cayley tree; it should be moved to a proper footnote or integrated into the main text, as numbered footnotes in the reference list are unconventional.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central superposition claim is a direct exact-diagonalization result for an independently parameterized transverse-field Ising model.

full rationale

The central claim—that the fourth and fifth spin flips form delocalized superpositions over equivalent sublattice sites—is obtained by exact diagonalization of the stated Hamiltonian H = Σ V_ij n_i^z n_j^z + Σ[(ℏΩ/2)σ_i^x − ℏΔ n_i^z] for the 9-site Sierpiński gasket, with V_ij = C6/r^6. The Hamiltonian is not defined in terms of the target superposition; the superposition is a computed ground-state property of the ideal threefold-symmetric lattice. Experimental parameters (C6, Ω, Δ) are calibrated by independent two-atom Rabi/blockade sweeps and single-atom Rabi oscillations (Extended Data Fig. 7), not fitted to the many-body 4- or 5-spin data. The disorder/defect model used in Methods ('Disorder and defects', 1% Gaussian position disorder and a 10% outward displacement of site 4) is a post-hoc attempt to reproduce measured asymmetries, but it is not used to construct the central phase diagram or the superposition claim, which is computed for the clean lattice. The manuscript itself flags validation limitations: Methods 'Trap deformations at tight spacings' attributes experimental asymmetry to WGS rounding and trap deformations, and Methods SIM-GRAPH states that the symmetry-projection method assumes symmetric sites are equally occupied and, for the first generation, does not correctly identify the 4- and 5-spin superposition phases (Extended Data Fig. 3). These are evidence-strength concerns, not circularity: the SIM-GRAPH higher-generation predictions are cross-checked against ED, VMF, and QMC in Fig. 3, and the first-generation result does not rely on SIM-GRAPH. The claim that the experimentally realized state is a coherent superposition rather than a classical mixture is not certified by the measured populations, but that bears on experimental validation, not on whether the derivation reduces to its inputs. Self-citations (refs 29, 30, 36, 41) concern related fractal phenomena and are not load-bearing for the Ising superposition result. No equation or fitted parameter was found that turns a predicted quantity into an input by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard Rydberg-to-Ising mapping, a specific lattice discretization choice, and the assumption that the experimental ramp is quasi-adiabatic. No new physical entities are postulated. The fitted inputs are the C6 coefficient and the post hoc disorder/defect parameters used to match the experimental asymmetry.

free parameters (4)
  • C6 interaction coefficient = 2π×2.96×10^7 MHz dFFT^6 (≈2π×2.5×10^5 MHz μm^6)
    Fitted from independent two-atom interaction calibration sweeps (Extended Data Fig.7f). Used as an input to the Hamiltonian for all phase-diagram predictions. It is a legitimate calibration, not fitted to the many-body data, but it is still a fitted input.
  • positional disorder sigma = 1% of NN distance
    Gaussian position noise added to the theory in Extended Data Fig.4d to better match the experimental symmetry breaking. Introduced post hoc, with no independent measurement, to improve agreement.
  • site-4 defect displacement = 10% of NN distance outward
    Single-site defect introduced in Methods 'Disorder and defects' to reproduce the asymmetric measured configurations. Chosen by hand after seeing the data, not derived from an independent calibration.
  • SPAM correction probabilities = p=0.989, eps_p=0.048, eps_n=0.01
    Calibrated in separate measurements and used to invert detection probabilities. Not free in the Hamiltonian, but they affect the reported corrected data in Extended Data Fig.4.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The transverse-field Ising Hamiltonian with van der Waals interactions accurately describes the 88Sr Rydberg tweezer array.
    Invoked throughout the paper; standard for Rydberg simulators and supported by the two-atom calibration, but still a modeling assumption.
  • ad hoc to paper The combined corner+center lattice is the appropriate discretization of the Sierpiński gasket.
    The Methods section 'Fractals' chooses this lattice because it preserves the holes of the fractal. Other lattice definitions give different connectivities and could change the phase diagram.
  • domain assumption The quasi-adiabatic sweep prepares the ground state of the final Hamiltonian.
    The comparison with ground-state ED assumes the experimental ramp ends in the ground state. The paper benchmarks this at low V but does not provide a fidelity measurement at high V/Omega.
  • ad hoc to paper SIM-GRAPH's projection assumes symmetric sites are occupied equally.
    Stated in Methods 'SIM-GRAPH'. This is only valid up to the symmetry-reduced graph size and misses some superposition states, as shown in Extended Data Fig.3.
  • standard math The QMC sign-free transformations from Ref [46] are valid for this Hamiltonian.
    Used in the Quantum Monte Carlo section; relies on the published transformation and on the positivity of the matrix elements after transformation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Control of single spin-flips in a Rydberg atomic fractal." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KLQ3NCL2

@misc{pith2026250903514,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Control of single spin-flips in a Rydberg atomic fractal},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KLQ3NCL2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.03514}
}
read the original abstract

Rydberg atoms trapped by optical tweezers have emerged as a versatile platform to emulate lattices with different geometries, in which long-range interacting spins lead to fascinating phenomena, ranging from spin liquids to topological states of matter. Here, we show that when the lattice has a fractal geometry with Hausdorff dimension 1.58, additional surprises appear. The system is described by a transverse-field Ising model with long-range van der Waals interactions in a Sierpi\`nski gasket fractal. We investigate the problem theoretically using exact diagonalization, variational mean field, quantum Monte Carlo, and a graph-based numerical technique, SIM-GRAPH, which we developed. We find that in the quantum regime, the phase diagram exhibits phases in which the spins flip one-by-one. The theoretical results are in excellent agreement with experiments performed with single 88Sr atoms trapped by optical tweezers arranged in a fractal geometry. The magnetization and von Neumann entanglement entropy reveal several regimes in which single spin-flips are delocalized over many sites of one sublattice, thus allowing for an unprecedented control of a cascade of phase transitions in a manybody system. These results expand the possibilities of Rydberg atoms for quantum information processing and may have profound implications in quantum technology.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C., Stormer, H

    Tsui, D. C., Stormer, H. L., & Gossard, A. C. Two-dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559-1562 (1982)

    work page 1982

  2. [2]

    Quantum Physics in one dimension, Oxford University Press (2003)

    Giamarchi, T. Quantum Physics in one dimension, Oxford University Press (2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires

    Kitaev , A. Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires. Physics-Uspekhi. 44, 131– 136 (2001)

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    W., Bloch, I

    Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hänsch, T. W., Bloch, I. Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms. Nature 415, 39–44 (2002)

    work page 2002

  5. [5]

    A Mott insulator of fermionic atoms in an optical lattice

    Jördens, R., Strohmaier, N., Günter, K., Moritz, H., Esslinger T. A Mott insulator of fermionic atoms in an optical lattice. Nature 455, 204-207 (2008)

    work page 2008

  6. [6]

    Many-body physics with ultracold gases

    Bloch, I., Dalibard, J., Zwerger, W. Many-body physics with ultracold gases. Rev. of Mod. Phys. 80, 885 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    & Buchler, H.P

    Weimer, H., Muller, M., Lesanovsky, I., Zoller, P. & Buchler, H.P . A Rydberg quantum simulator. Nat. Phys. 6, 382-388 (2010)

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Wilk, T. et al. Entanglement of two individual neutral atoms using Rydberg blockade. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 010502 (2010)

    work page 2010

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    & Browaeys, A

    Barredo, D., de Léséleuc, S., Lienhard, V ., Lahaye, T. & Browaeys, A. An atom-by- atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary 2D atomic arrays. Science 354, 1021–1023 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    & Browaeys, A

    Barredo, D., Lienhard, V ., de Léséleuc, S., Lahaye, T. & Browaeys, A. Synthetic three- dimensional atomic structures assembled atom by atom. Nature 561, 79–82 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Ohl de Mello, D. et al. Defect-free assembly of 2D clusters of more than 100 single- atom quantum systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 203601 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    & Lahaye, T

    Browaeys, A. & Lahaye, T. Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms. Nat. Phys. 16, 132–142 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    K., You L

    Wu X., Liang X., Tian, Y ., Yang F ., Chen C., Liu Y .-C., Tey, M. K., You L. A concise review of Rydberg atom-based quantum computation and quantum simulation Chin. Phys. B 30, 020305 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Semeghini, G. et al. Probing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator. Science 374, 1242–1247 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    de Léséleuc, S. et al. Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms. Science 365, 775–780 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Surace, F . M. et al. Lattice Gauge Theories and String Dynamics in Rydberg Atom Quantum Simulators. Phys. Rev. X 10, 021041 (2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    Labuhn, H. et al. Tunable two-dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising models. Nature 534, 667–670 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Bernien, H. et al. Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator. Nature 551, 579-584 (2017)

    2017

  11. [19]

    Ebadi, S. et al. Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator. Nature 595, 227-232 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    Scholl, P . et al. Quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hundreds of Rydberg atoms. Nature 595, 233-238 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Quantum simulation of Cayley- tree Ising Hamiltonians with three-dimensional Rydberg atoms

    Song, Y ., Kim, M., Hwang, H., Lee, W., and Ahn, J. Quantum simulation of Cayley- tree Ising Hamiltonians with three-dimensional Rydberg atoms. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013286 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    [21] is a fractal, it has integer Hausdorff dimension 𝑑𝐻 = 1 because it has ramification 𝑟 = 3 and 𝑑𝐻 = 𝑙𝑛(𝑟 − 1)/ 𝑙𝑛 2

    Although the Cayley tree investigated theoretically and experimentally in Ref. [21] is a fractal, it has integer Hausdorff dimension 𝑑𝐻 = 1 because it has ramification 𝑟 = 3 and 𝑑𝐻 = 𝑙𝑛(𝑟 − 1)/ 𝑙𝑛 2

  15. [23]

    Sur une courbe dont tout point est un point de ramification

    Sierpiński, W. Sur une courbe dont tout point est un point de ramification. Comptes Rendu Acad. Sci. 160, 302–305 (1915)

    1915

  16. [24]

    Dimension und ̈außeres Maß

    Hausdorff, F. Dimension und ̈außeres Maß. Mathematische Annalen 79, 157-179 (1918)

    1918

  17. [25]

    Mandelbrot, B. B. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. Science 156, 636–638 (1967)

    1967

  18. [26]

    Mandelbrot, B. B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, New York, 1983)

    1983

  19. [27]

    Dynamics of fractal networks, Science 231, 814-819 (1986)

    Orbach, R. Dynamics of fractal networks, Science 231, 814-819 (1986)

    1986

  20. [28]

    Barnsley, M. F. Fractals everywhere. Academic press, 2014

    2014

  21. [29]

    N., Slot, M

    Kempkes, S. N., Slot, M. R., Freeney, S.E., Zevenhuizen, S. J. M., Vanmaekelbergh, D., Swart, I., & Morais Smith, C. Design and characterization of electrons in a fractal geometry. Nat. Phys. 15, 127-131 (2019)

    2019

  22. [30]

    & Morais Smith, C

    Canyellas, R., Liu, Chen, Arouca, R., Eek, L., Wang, G., Yin, Y ., Guan, D., Li, Y ., Wang, S., Zheng, H., Liu, Canhua, Jia, J. & Morais Smith, C. Topological edge and corner states in bismuth fractal nanostructures. Nat. Phys. 20, 1421-1428 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    Sendker, F . L. et al., Emergence of fractal geometries in the evolution of a metabolic enzyme. Nature 628, 894-900 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    & Kubica, A

    Yoshida, B. & Kubica, A. Quantum criticality from Ising model on fractal lattices, arXiv:1404.6311

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Quantum critical behavior of the quantum Ising model on fractal lattices

    Yi, H. Quantum critical behavior of the quantum Ising model on fractal lattices. Phys. Rev. E 91, 012118 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Multi-partite entanglement, quantum coherence, and quantum criticality in triangular and Sierpiński fractal lattices

    Cheng, Jun-Qing & Xu, Jing-Bo. Multi-partite entanglement, quantum coherence, and quantum criticality in triangular and Sierpiński fractal lattices. Phys. Rev. E 97, 062134 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Krcmar, R. et al. Tensor-network study of a quantum phase transition on the Sierpiński fractal. Phys. Rev. E 98, 062114 (2018)

    2018

  28. [36]

    The fractal-lattice Hubbard model

    Conte, M., Zampronio, V ., Röntgen, M., & Morais Smith, C. The fractal-lattice Hubbard model. Quantum 8, 1469 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Maceira, I. A. & Läuchli, A. M. Thermalization dynamics in closed quantum many body systems: a precision large scale exact diagonalization study. ArXiv:2409.18863

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    More detailed VMF calculations using annealing indicate that this is a very robust metastable state, with a small energy difference to the true ground state. SIM-GRAPH misses the ground state because it is composed of a superposition of spin up and down on neighbouring sites, ...

  31. [39]

    et al., Quantum phases of Rydberg atoms on a kagome lattice

    Samajdar, R. et al., Quantum phases of Rydberg atoms on a kagome lattice. Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 2015785118 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    et al., Emulating quantum teleportation of Majorana zero mode qubit

    Huang, H.-L. et al., Emulating quantum teleportation of Majorana zero mode qubit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 090502 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    F ., & Morais Smith, C

    Eek, L., Osseweijer, Z. F ., & Morais Smith, C. Fractality-induced topology. Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 246601 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    S., Scholl, P ., Barredo, D., Hauschild, J., Chatterjee, S., Schuler, M., Läuchli, A

    Chen, C., Bornet, G., Bintz, M., Emperauger, G., Leclerc, L., Liu, V . S., Scholl, P ., Barredo, D., Hauschild, J., Chatterjee, S., Schuler, M., Läuchli, A. M., Zaletel, M. P ., Lahaye, T., Yao, N. Y . & Browaeys, A. Continuous Symmetry Breaking in a Two- dimensional Rydberg A...

    2023

  35. [43]

    Between the periodic structure of a lattice and the chaos of randomness, quasi-crystals and fractals show an intermediate level of structure

    Theory Fractals. Between the periodic structure of a lattice and the chaos of randomness, quasi-crystals and fractals show an intermediate level of structure. Whereas quasi - crystals can be mapped to higher-dimensional lattices, fractals are structured according to their scal...

  36. [44]

    Experimental Sequence Defect-free single-atom array

    Experimental setup A. Experimental Sequence Defect-free single-atom array. All experiments start by stochastically (p~50%) loading a pattern of 6×6 optical tweezers ( λ=813 nm) with single 88Sr atoms and detecting the atoms by collecting fluorescence during illumination with 6...

  37. [45]

    Graph theory

    Diestel, R. Graph theory. Springer, 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    Liu, D. C. & Nocedal, J. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization. Mathematical Programming 45, 503–528 (1989)

    1989

  39. [47]

    Sandvik, A. W. & Kurkijärvi, J. Quantum Monte Carlo simulation method for spin systems. Phys. Rev. B 43, 5950–5961(1991)

    1991

  40. [48]

    Merali, E., De Vlugt, I. J. S, & Melko, R. G. Stochastic series expansion quantum Monte Carlo for Rydberg arrays. SciPost Phys. Core 7, 016 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    url:https://github.com/QuEraComputing/Bloqade.jl/ (2023)

    Bloqade.jl: Package for the quantum computation and quantum simulation based on the neutral-atom architecture. url:https://github.com/QuEraComputing/Bloqade.jl/ (2023)

    2023

  42. [50]

    Single strontium atoms in optical tweezers

    Urech, A. Single strontium atoms in optical tweezers. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Urech, A. et al. Narrow-linewidth imaging of single atoms in optical tweezers. Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 023245 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Knottnerus, I. H. A. et al. Parallel assembly of neutral atom arrays with an SLM using linear phase interpolation. arXiv:2501.01391 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Knottnerus, I. H. A. Long-range interactions in arbitrary geometries. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    M., Browaeys, A., Sortais, Y

    Tuchendler, C., Lance, A. M., Browaeys, A., Sortais, Y . R. P . & Grangier, P . Energy distribution and cooling of a single atom in an optical tweezer. Phys. Rev. A 78, 033425 (2008)

    2008

  47. [55]

    Madjarov, I. S. et al. High-fidelity entanglement and detection of alkaline-earth Rydberg atoms. Nat. Phys. 16, 857–861 (2020)

    2020

  48. [56]

    A Software Package for Sequential Quadratic Programming (Institut für Dynamik der Flugsysteme, 1988)

    Kraft, D. A Software Package for Sequential Quadratic Programming (Institut für Dynamik der Flugsysteme, 1988)

    1988

  49. [57]

    Entangling, Controlling, and Detecting Individual Strontium Atoms in Optical Tweezer Arrays

    Madjarov, I. Entangling, Controlling, and Detecting Individual Strontium Atoms in Optical Tweezer Arrays. PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms

    Welch, P . The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 15, 70–73 (1967)

    1967

  51. [59]

    https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.signal.welch.html (accessed 9 May 2025)

    SciPy Documentation: scipy.signal.welch. https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/generated/scipy.signal.welch.html (accessed 9 May 2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    Kale, A. M. Towards High Fidelity Quantum Computation and Simulation with Rydberg Atoms. MA thesis, California Institute of Technology (2020)

    2020

  53. [61]

    & Ruocco, G

    Di Leonardo, R., Ianni, F . & Ruocco, G. Computer generation of optimal holograms for optical trap arrays. Opt. Express 15, 1913–1922 (2007)

    1913

  54. [62]

    Kim, H. et al. Gerchberg–Saxton algorithm for fast and efficient atom rearrangement in optical tweezer traps. Opt. Express 27, 2184–2190 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    Materials for the Quantum Age

    Chew, Y . T. et al. Ultraprecise holographic optical tweezer array. Phys. Rev. A 110, 053518 (2024). Acknowledgements: We are grateful to T. Macrí for fruitful discussions and for participating in the early stage of this research. We also acknowledge discussions with M. Aidels...

    2024

  56. [69]

    Notice the narrow regimes of ⟨𝑛↑⟩=21 and ⟨𝑛↑⟩=36

    and antiferromagnetic (⟨𝑛↑⟩ = 42) patterns. Notice the narrow regimes of ⟨𝑛↑⟩=21 and ⟨𝑛↑⟩=36. The regime of ⟨𝑛↑⟩ = 27 is not discernible. These results reiterate the ones obtained for the first- and second-generation Sierpiński gasket. Extended Data Fig.6| UV ramps, laser nois...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.