Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.01767 v2 pith:KNX4ENTM submitted 2020-10-28 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords attacksbackdooraccuracyattacktestdatasetfederatedloss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Malicious clients can attack federated learning systems using malicious data, including backdoor samples, during the training phase. The compromised global model will perform well on the validation dataset designed for the task, but a small subset of data with backdoor patterns may trigger the model to make a wrong prediction. There has been an arms race between attackers who tried to conceal attacks and defenders who tried to detect attacks during the aggregation stage of training on the server-side. In this work, we propose a new and effective method to mitigate backdoor attacks after the training phase. Specifically, we design a federated pruning method to remove redundant neurons in the network and then adjust the model's extreme weight values. Our experiments conducted on distributed Fashion-MNIST show that our method can reduce the average attack success rate from 99.7% to 1.9% with a 5.5% loss of test accuracy on the validation dataset. To minimize the pruning influence on test accuracy, we can fine-tune after pruning, and the attack success rate drops to 6.4%, with only a 1.7% loss of test accuracy. Further experiments under Distributed Backdoor Attacks on CIFAR-10 also show promising results that the average attack success rate drops more than 70% with less than 2% loss of test accuracy on the validation dataset.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Decoding FL Defenses: Systemization, Pitfalls, and Remedies

    cs.CR 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Many FL defenses are evaluated on overly easy datasets and attacks, and this paper demonstrates with case studies that those easy settings can make weak defenses look strong.

Pith tools