Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Best Practices for Responsible Machine Learning in Credit Scoring

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.20536 v1 pith:KPISEV2S submitted 2024-09-30 cs.LG cs.CY

classification cs.LGcs.CY
keywords creditlearningmachinepracticesbestresponsiblescoringbiases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The widespread use of machine learning in credit scoring has brought significant advancements in risk assessment and decision-making. However, it has also raised concerns about potential biases, discrimination, and lack of transparency in these automated systems. This tutorial paper performed a non-systematic literature review to guide best practices for developing responsible machine learning models in credit scoring, focusing on fairness, reject inference, and explainability. We discuss definitions, metrics, and techniques for mitigating biases and ensuring equitable outcomes across different groups. Additionally, we address the issue of limited data representativeness by exploring reject inference methods that incorporate information from rejected loan applications. Finally, we emphasize the importance of transparency and explainability in credit models, discussing techniques that provide insights into the decision-making process and enable individuals to understand and potentially improve their creditworthiness. By adopting these best practices, financial institutions can harness the power of machine learning while upholding ethical and responsible lending practices.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Building crypto portfolios with agentic AI

    q-fin.PM 2025-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper's backtest claims a 30-day rolling Sharpe-maximizing strategy outperforms static allocation for top-10 cryptocurrencies from 2020 to 2025.

Pith tools