Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Context versus Prior Knowledge in Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.04633 v3 pith:KUXNBRMM submitted 2024-04-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords contextentitymodelmodelspriorknowledgeanswercontexts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

To answer a question, language models often need to integrate prior knowledge learned during pretraining and new information presented in context. We hypothesize that models perform this integration in a predictable way across different questions and contexts: models will rely more on prior knowledge for questions about entities (e.g., persons, places, etc.) that they are more familiar with due to higher exposure in the training corpus, and be more easily persuaded by some contexts than others. To formalize this problem, we propose two mutual information-based metrics to measure a model's dependency on a context and on its prior about an entity: first, the persuasion score of a given context represents how much a model depends on the context in its decision, and second, the susceptibility score of a given entity represents how much the model can be swayed away from its original answer distribution about an entity. We empirically test our metrics for their validity and reliability. Finally, we explore and find a relationship between the scores and the model's expected familiarity with an entity, and provide two use cases to illustrate their benefits.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. EvoWiki: Evaluating LLMs on Evolving Knowledge

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    EvoWiki categorizes facts as stable, evolved, or uncharted and shows that LLMs perform much worse on evolved and uncharted knowledge, with RAG plus continual learning providing the best adaptation.

  2. HERA: Improving Long Document Summarization using Large Language Models with Context Packaging and Reordering

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    HERA packages event-related paragraphs and reorders them so LLMs produce more faithful and fluent summaries of long documents without fine-tuning.

Pith tools