Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

This paper claims that stringy vibrations of a gravitational junction between two BTZ black holes are exactly equivalent, to all orders in perturbation theory, to wavepackets that travel on one boundary wire and reflect perfectly at the int

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 20:28 UTC pith:KVVMASP3

load-bearing objection The paper gives a plausible all-order conformal-map decoding of junction string modes and a new boundary-entropy result, but the wavepacket dictionary is underdetermined by an arbitrary resummation parameter, and the key EE calculation is not shown. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2511.19592 v2 pith:KVVMASP3 submitted 2025-11-24 hep-th cond-mat.str-elgr-qc

On decoding the string from interfaces in 2d conformal field theories

classification hep-th cond-mat.str-elgr-qc
keywords AdS3/CFT2gravitational junctionNambu-Goto stringholographic interfacehalf-sided conformal transformationentanglement entropystrong sub-additivityBTZ black hole
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that the full non-linear stringy vibrations of a gravitational junction between two BTZ black holes — dual to an interface between two thermal conformal field theories — are not merely boundary perturbations but are exactly equivalent, to all orders in the perturbative expansion, to wavepackets that live on one of the boundary wires and reflect perfectly at the interface without shape distortion. This equivalence is realized by a state-dependent half-sided conformal transformation, which also determines the expectation value of the displacement operator at the interface. The paper further claims that even when the string tension goes to zero and the wavepacket picture degenerates, the stringy modes remain visible in the entanglement entropy of an interval straddling the interface, appearing at quadratic order in the interval length. A sympathetic reader should care because this is a concrete step toward decoding stringy degrees of freedom in holography: the junction's internal vibrations become observable data in the dual field theory, with causality and strong subadditivity preserved.

Core claim

General solutions of the gravitational junction gluing two identical BTZ spacetimes are governed by solutions of the non-linear Nambu-Goto equation for a tensile string. The paper's central claim is that each such Nambu-Goto solution translates, via a half-sided conformal transformation on the second wire, into a wavepacket in the boundary energy-momentum tensor that is perfectly reflected at the interface without distortion when incident from past null infinity. The same transformation fixes the transient source in the Ward identity, i.e., the expectation value of the displacement operator. The paper also shows that the entanglement entropy of an interval that straddles the interface decode

What carries the argument

The central object is the half-sided conformal transformation (3.5) defined by the function h, which undoes the relative time reparametrization t_2 = h(t_1) across the interface; this transformation is what turns Nambu-Goto solutions into the reflected wavepackets. The global structure of the solution is controlled by the resummation ansatz (3.15)-(3.16), which writes every junction variable as w(σ) + Σ u_n(σ)/cosh^n(2μτ) + Σ v_n(σ)/(κ cosh(2μτ)+sinh(2μτ))^n for arbitrary κ>1 and weight c(κ). The entanglement calculation uses a uniformization map to vacuum AdS3, the HRRT prescription for geodesic lengths, and junction conditions on the worldsheet to determine the geodesic intersection point

Load-bearing premise

The global resummation ansatz in Sec. 3.1 (Eqs. (3.15)-(3.16)) — that every physical junction solution can be written as w(σ) + Σ u_n(σ)/cosh^n(2μτ) + Σ v_n(σ)/(κ cosh(2μτ)+sinh(2μτ))^n for arbitrary κ>1 and arbitrary weight c(κ) — is assumed rather than derived from the Nambu-Goto equation; the specific wavepacket profiles shown (using κ=2) may therefore be artifacts of that choice.

What would settle it

Numerically integrate the full non-linear Nambu-Goto equation for the explicit solution (2.10) from early times and compare the boundary energy-momentum at future null infinity with the κ=2 resummed wavepacket predicted by (3.20); if the numerical solution cannot be matched by any choice of κ and weight c(κ) in (3.15)-(3.16), the perfect-reflection correspondence is an artifact of the resummation ansatz.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Each solution of the Nambu-Goto equation for the junction corresponds to a wavepacket on the second wire that is perfectly reflected without distortion at the interface, with both wires at the same temperature.
  • The wavepackets are generated by a state-dependent half-sided conformal transformation, and the expectation value of the displacement operator at the interface is determined by the same transformation.
  • Even when the string tension is taken to zero, the Nambu-Goto modes leave an imprint in the entanglement entropy of a straddling interval at order (μ l)^2, via terms proportional to α_h A_0.
  • The boundary entropy g_eff(y) depends only on the ratio y of the lengths of the left and right parts of the interval, and is unaffected by temperature, rigid parameters, or the Nambu-Goto modes.
  • Strong subadditivity of entanglement entropy is satisfied perturbatively in all configurations considered, and is saturated for symmetric intervals even with stringy vibrations present.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the correspondence is exact, the interface acts as a lossless, shape-preserving mirror for the stringy modes, implying that the junction's internal vibrational state is recoverable from light-ray data on a single boundary wire at null infinity.
  • The κ-dependence of the resummation suggests a possible non-uniqueness: different choices of κ and weight c(κ) may produce different early-time wavepackets while agreeing at late times, which would imply that bulk-to-boundary decoding is not one-to-one unless an additional physical principle fixes κ.
  • The same half-sided conformal-transformation mechanism should extend to n-way junctions, where n−1 wires reflect wavepackets and mix through Monge-Ampère couplings; the entropy-decoding tool developed here could be used to identify stringy modes in those settings.
  • A numerical or tensor-network simulation of a 2d interface CFT with a tunable conformal defect could search for the predicted distortion-free reflected wavepackets and the quadratic-in-length entanglement imprint, providing a sharp test of the holographic dictionary at finite coupling.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the holographic interpretation of gravitational junctions in AdS3, where the junction is a tensile string satisfying the non-linear Nambu-Goto (NG) equation. The authors consider two identical BTZ black holes glued along a string worldsheet, dual to an interface between two thermal CFTs. They derive the relation (3.3) between the boundary time reparametrization t_d(tau) and the NG mode A(tau), and use it to represent the junction as a half-sided conformal transformation h on the second wire. They claim that every NG solution translates to a wavepacket on the second wire that is perfectly reflected at the interface without shape distortion, with initial data at past null infinity. In Sec. 3.1 they introduce a resummation ansatz (3.15) with an arbitrary parameter kappa>1, and in (3.16) a weighted average with weight c(kappa), to extend the perturbative expansion to all times. An explicit example with kappa=2 and tuned coefficients (3.22) produces smooth wavepackets. In Sec. 4 they compute the entanglement entropy of an interval straddling the interface using HRRT and uniformization, and find terms quadratic in interval length that encode the rigid parameter alpha_h and NG amplitude A_0 even when the tension vanishes; they also check strong subadditivity.

Significance. Eq. (3.3) is a clean and testable relation, and the entanglement entropy computation leading to (4.5) is substantive and technically involved. The paper also makes a nontrivial check of strong subadditivity. However, the central dictionary claim as stated is not fully determined: the resummation ansatz introduces an arbitrary kappa and weight c(kappa), so the same NG quasi-normal data yields infinitely many global configurations and hence infinitely many wavepackets. The specific kappa=2 example is a convention, not a derived dictionary. The weaker statement — that some conformal-transformation representation exists for each resummed solution — is plausible, but the headline 'each NG solution translates to a unique reflected wavepacket' requires either a uniqueness argument or an explicit qualification.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 3.1, Eqs. (3.15)-(3.16)] The global resummation ansatz is imposed rather than derived from the Nambu-Goto equation or the junction conditions. For fixed kappa, requiring the absence of outgoing modes at tau -> -infinity gives v_n = -(kappa-1)^n u_n, and the late-time quasi-normal data determine only the combined coefficient 2^n u_n + 2^n (kappa+1)^{-n} v_n. Hence u_n, and thus the global solution, depend on the arbitrary kappa>1; Eq. (3.16) adds a further arbitrary normalized weight c(kappa). The paper asserts that the late-time coefficients and a chosen kappa determine the global solution, but this is a choice of resummation, not a consequence of the dynamics. Consequently the claimed one-to-one correspondence between NG solutions and wavepackets is underdetermined. The explicit example fixes kappa=2 in (3.21) and adjusts alpha_q3...alpha_q7 in (3.22) to enforce smoothness, but this does not select a physical k
  2. [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.7)] The 'perfect reflection without distortion' is kinematical: because the same h is applied to x_+ and x_- in the conformal transformation (3.5), Ttilde_{++}(x_+) and Ttilde_{--}(x_-) are the same function of their respective arguments by construction. The paper acknowledges this ('The reflection is without distortion simply because ...'), but then interprets the process as a causal dynamical outcome. The causal story in Sec. 3.1.1 — the excitation time at tilde{t}= - (1/4mu) ln 3 and the support thresholds (3.23)-(3.24) — is tied to the specific kappa=2 resummation; with another kappa the profile and excitation time change. The physical content of the construction is the existence of a conformal transformation h determined by t_d(tau), not a dynamical reflection law.
  3. [Sec. 3.1.1] The smoothness conditions leading to (3.21)-(3.22) require h^{-1} to have continuous first, second and third derivatives. The coefficients alpha_q3...alpha_q7 in (3.22) are then chosen relative to alpha_q2 precisely to make the piecewise definition (3.20) C^3. The paper does not show that typical NG data admit a C^3 h^{-1} of the form (3.18), nor that the series converges for arbitrary u_n, v_n. Thus the explicit wavepackets are a specially tuned existence example, not a demonstration of a general correspondence between NG modes and smooth wavepackets. A general argument or an explicit statement of the necessary conditions on the quasi-normal data is needed.
  4. [Appendix B.1] In the symmetric case x_0=0, the paper states that 'we have checked that the SSA is saturated to O(epsilon^2 mu r_1,2)' — the order at which A_0 contributes. No expression or vanishing calculation is shown in the appendix. Since the abstract advertises that SSA is 'saturated for symmetric intervals generally', the supporting computation (or at least the cancellation pattern) should be provided, or the claim should be restricted to the leading order actually demonstrated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 4, text after Eq. (4.5)] 'the length of the interval island y' should read 'the parameter y' (or 'the ratio y'); 'island' appears to be a typo.
  2. [Footnote 6] The caveat that intervals with one endpoint on the defect can have a modified effective central charge c_eff is important; it should be stated in the main text so the reader does not take the y->0 limit of (4.5) as a prediction for c_eff.
  3. [Eqs. (3.13) and (3.20)] The relation between the perturbative h^{-1} in (3.13) and the resummed expression (3.20) is not explained. A reader cannot see how the alpha_qn coefficients in (3.22) are matched to the perturbative solution (2.10); a short derivation or consistency check would be helpful.
  4. [Fig. 1(a)] The caption refers to h^{-1}(rho) while the main text uses h^{-1}(x) with rho = e^{2 mu x}; please clarify the argument in the caption.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged

Perfect reflection is built into the conformal map (3.5)-(3.7), and the resummation ansatz (3.15)-(3.16) leaves the NG-to-wavepacket dictionary underdetermined via free κ and c(κ).

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Sec. 3, Eq. (3.5), Eq. (3.7), paragraph containing 'perfectly reflected' claim]
    "each solution of the non-linear Nambu-Goto equation corresponding to the dual gravitational junction translates to a wavepacket living on the second wire, which is reflected perfectly, without distortion, to future null infinity when incident on the dual interface from past null infinity... Note that the reflection is without distortion simply because T++ and T−− are the same function of their respective arguments."

    Equation (3.5) defines the continuous coordinates on the second wire by applying the same h^{-1} symmetrically to x+ and x−, and Eq. (3.7) then gives both eT(2),++ and eT(2),−− in terms of the same h. Therefore the equality of the two moving profiles—the 'perfect reflection without distortion'—is imposed by the form of the conformal map, not derived from Nambu-Goto dynamics or the junction conditions. Any conformal transformation h would produce this property; the NG data only selects h, so the headline reflection effect is a built-in consequence of the construction rather than an independent output.

  2. other [Sec. 3.1, Eq. (3.15), Eq. (3.16), and the κ=2 example in Sec. 3.1.1]
    "f(τ, σ, κ) = w(σ) + Σ_{n=2} u_n(σ)/cosh^n(2μτ) + Σ_{n=2} v_n(σ)/(κ cosh(2μτ)+sinh(2μτ))^n, with κ>1 an arbitrary constant... More generally, one can consider the resummation F(τ, σ)=∫_1^∞ dκ c(κ)f(τ,σ,κ), with a choice of weights c(κ) satisfying ∫_1^∞ dκ c(κ)=1, determining the global solution of the junction conditions together with the coefficients of the quasi-normal mode expansion of the solution of Nambu-Goto equation."

    The resummation ansatz introduces an arbitrary constant κ>1 and, in the general form, an arbitrary normalized weight c(κ). The same late-time quasi-normal coefficients—the data defining the NG mode—therefore determine infinitely many global solutions h^{-1}(x) of the junction conditions, one for each κ and weight. The specific wavepackets on I±, including the support thresholds (3.23)-(3.24), are computed after fixing κ=2 and tuning the coefficients via (3.22); choosing κ≠2 or nontrivial c(κ) changes the initial data at past null infinity without changing the NG mode. Hence the claimed correspondence 'each NG solution ↔ a specific reflected wavepacket' is underdetermined by the physical input and is partly an artifact of the chosen resummation convention.

full rationale

The paper's technical core—the entanglement entropy computation (4.5) and the strong sub-additivity checks—is a self-contained perturbative calculation and does not reduce to its inputs. However, the central wavepacket claim of Sec. 3 is only partly independent. Equation (3.5) constructs the continuous coordinates by applying h^{-1} to both light-cone coordinates on the second wire, and (3.7) then guarantees the left- and right-moving stress-tensor profiles are the same function of their arguments; the paper itself states that the reflection is without distortion 'simply because' of this. That is a definitional property of the conformal map, not a Nambu-Goto prediction. Moreover, the resummation (3.15)-(3.16) contains free κ and arbitrary weights c(κ), so the same quasi-normal data yields many global solutions and different past/future null-infinity wavepacket profiles. The explicit κ=2 example is a convention, not a derived dictionary. Thus the headline correspondence has a strong by-construction component, giving partial circularity. The reliance on [17] and [18] is self-citation but those works are used as prior results and consistency checks, not as the engine forcing the central claim; accordingly the score is moderate rather than extreme.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

6 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The derivation leans on the self-cited [17] junction-to-NG map and on an ad hoc resummation whose free weight c(κ) and parameter κ determine the very wavepackets the paper claims to derive. The EE section adds perturbative small-interval assumptions. No new physical entity is postulated.

free parameters (6)
  • A0 (quasi-normal amplitude) = input amplitude in (2.10)
    Amplitude of the leading NG quasi-normal mode; all later wavepacket and EE signatures are expressed in terms of it but it is not predicted by the paper.
  • α_h (rigid time translation parameter) = input; e.g., nonzero in (2.10), (3.13)
    Half-sided time-translation parameter that survives in the tensionless limit; its value is not derived.
  • γ_h (second rigid parameter) = set to 0 for most results
    Second rigid parameter in (2.10); set to zero because otherwise h^{-1} maps spatial infinity to a finite point (Sec. 3.1).
  • κ (resummation parameter) = 2 in the explicit example
    Appears in the resummation (3.15); arbitrary κ>1. It is fixed to 2 in the example to force h^{-1} to be smooth through third derivative.
  • α_q2...α_q7 (late-time h^{-1} coefficients) = ratios fixed by (3.22); overall scale α_q2 remains free
    Coefficients in h^{-1}(x)=x+α_h+Σ α_qn e^{-2nμx}; ratios are chosen by hand to ensure smoothness, so the specific wavepacket profile is not derived from NG dynamics.
  • c(κ) (resummation weight function) = unspecified, normalized by ∫ c(κ)dκ=1
    Arbitrary weight in (3.16) controlling the global solution at early times; this freedom makes the claimed NG-to-wavepacket correspondence non-unique.
axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Gravitational junction conditions in 3D gravity reduce to the non-linear Nambu-Goto equation for a string in M (result of [17])
    Sec. 2 uses this as the starting point; the paper does not rederive it. The central wavepacket dictionary inherits whatever approximations are in [17].
  • domain assumption Both sides of the junction are the same BTZ black brane, so the dual CFTs are identical thermal states at equal temperature T=μ/π
    Secs. 2-3. Equal-temperature restriction is essential for the perfect-reflection statement; different-temperature interfaces are left out.
  • ad hoc to paper Physical solutions have no outgoing modes at the worldsheet horizon at any time; late-time quasi-normal data determine the global solution
    Sec. 3.1 imposes vanishing e^{2nμτ} coefficients at τ→−∞. This is a causality-motivated but unproven selection rule.
  • ad hoc to paper Every global solution can be represented by the resummation f(τ,σ,κ)=w(σ)+Σ u_n(σ)/cosh^n(2μτ)+Σ v_n(σ)/(κ cosh(2μτ)+sinh(2μτ))^n, κ>1, or a weighted average with ∫ c(κ)dκ=1
    Eqs. (3.15)-(3.16). The ansatz is taken from [22] (Gubser flow) without proof for junction worldsheets; arbitrary κ and c(κ) make wavepacket profiles non-unique.
  • ad hoc to paper γ_h=0 and no temperature-changing SL(2,R) conformal transformation is allowed
    Sec. 3.1: nonzero γ_h maps spatial infinity to a finite point; temperature-changing h is ruled out. This restricts the class of interfaces considered.
  • domain assumption HRRT prescription with the uniformization method of [50-52] applies to geodesics that cross the junction
    Appendix A uses this standard holographic tool; the junction is treated perturbatively and the geodesic is assumed not to penetrate the horizon (μl≪1).
  • domain assumption Perturbative double expansion in ϵ and μl is valid; interval lengths satisfy μδ_c ≪ μl ≪ 1
    Sec. 4: necessary because the perturbative junction solution breaks down at the worldsheet horizon. All EE results are restricted to this regime.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 23594 in / 17678 out tokens · 162862 ms · 2026-08-03T20:28:56.661030+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

General solutions of a gravitational junction between two copies of a three-dimensional Einstein manifold $\mathcal{M}$ correspond to the solutions of the non-linear Nambu-Goto equation for a string in $\mathcal{M}$. We show that, for the junctions in three-dimensional anti-de Sitter spacetimes constituted by tensile strings, which are dual to interfaces between thermal states in conformal field theories, the solutions of the Nambu-Goto equation describing the junction correspond to wave-packets, which are perfectly reflected at the interface to future null infinity \textit{without shape distortion} when incident from past null infinity. These wavepackets are realized by half-sided conformal transformations and affect the expectation value of the displacement operator. We further show that the entanglement entropy of an interval straddling the interface deciphers the stringy modes of the dual junction even in the tensionless limit. We also demonstrate that the strong sub-additivity of entanglement entropy is satisfied and is saturated for symmetric intervals generally.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Decoding multiway gravitational junctions in AdS in terms of holographic quantum maps

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Multiway AdS junctions dualize to factorized quantum maps on CFT interfaces, with scattering matrix fixed by junction tension and automorphisms from n-1 stringy modes, independent of background state.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 56 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv

    J.M. Maldacena,The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231 [hep-th/9711200]

  2. [2]

    Gubser, I.R

    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov,Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,Phys. Lett. B428(1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109]

  3. [3]

    Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv

    E. Witten,Anti-de Sitter space and holography,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150]

  4. [4]

    Harlow,TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT,PoST ASI2017 (2018) 002 [1802.01040]

    D. Harlow,TASI Lectures on the Emergence of Bulk Physics in AdS/CFT,PoST ASI2017 (2018) 002 [1802.01040]

  5. [5]

    Jahn and J

    A. Jahn and J. Eisert,Holographic tensor network models and quantum error correction: a topical review,Quantum Sci. Technol.6(2021) 033002 [2102.02619]

  6. [6]

    B. Chen, B. Czech and Z.-z. Wang,Quantum information in holographic duality,Rept. Prog. Phys.85(2022) 046001 [2108.09188]

  7. [7]

    T. Kibe, P. Mandayam and A. Mukhopadhyay,Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 463 [2110.14669]

  8. [8]

    Hartnoll, A

    S.A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas and S. Sachdev,Holographic quantum matter,arXiv1612.07324 (2016)

  9. [9]

    Green, J.H

    M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten,Superstring Theory Vol. 1: 25th Anniversary Edition, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (11, 2012), 10.1017/CBO9781139248563

  10. [10]

    Green, J.H

    M.B. Green, J.H. Schwarz and E. Witten,SUPERSTRING THEORY. VOL. 2: LOOP AMPLITUDES, ANOMALIES AND PHENOMENOLOGY(7, 1988)

  11. [11]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (12, 2007), 10.1017/CBO9780511816079

  12. [12]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (12, 2007), 10.1017/CBO9780511618123

  13. [13]

    Karch and L

    A. Karch and L. Randall,Locally localized gravity,JHEP05(2001) 008 [hep-th/0011156]. – 26 –

  14. [14]

    Karch and L

    A. Karch and L. Randall,Localized gravity in string theory,Phys. Rev. Lett.87(2001) 061601 [hep-th/0105108]

  15. [15]

    DeWolfe, D.Z

    O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman and H. Ooguri,Holography and defect conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 025009 [hep-th/0111135]

  16. [16]

    Bachas, J

    C. Bachas, J. de Boer, R. Dijkgraaf and H. Ooguri,Permeable conformal walls and holography,JHEP06(2002) 027 [hep-th/0111210]

  17. [17]

    Banerjee, A

    A. Banerjee, A. Mukhopadhyay and G. Policastro,Nambu-Goto equation from three-dimensional gravity,JHEP09(2024) 013 [2404.02149]

  18. [18]

    Chakraborty, T

    A. Chakraborty, T. Kibe, M. Molina, A. Mukhopadhyay and H. Vamshi,Decoding the string in terms of holographic quantum maps,2509.13404

  19. [19]

    Banados, C

    M. Banados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli,The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett.69(1992) 1849 [hep-th/9204099]

  20. [20]

    Banados, M

    M. Banados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli,Geometry of the (2+1) black hole, Phys. Rev. D48(1993) 1506 [gr-qc/9302012]

  21. [21]

    Banerjee, T

    A. Banerjee, T. Mitra, A. Mukhopadhyay and A. Soloviev,How Gubser flow ends in a holographic conformal theory,Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 550 [2307.10384]

  22. [22]

    Mitra, S

    T. Mitra, S. Mondkar, A. Mukhopadhyay and A. Soloviev,Holographic Gubser flow. A combined analytic and numerical study,JHEP10(2024) 226 [2408.04001]

  23. [23]

    Affleck and A.W.W

    I. Affleck and A.W.W. Ludwig,Universal noninteger ’ground state degeneracy’ in critical quantum systems,Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991) 161

  24. [24]

    Cardy,Boundary conformal field theory,hep-th/0411189

    J.L. Cardy,Boundary conformal field theory,hep-th/0411189

  25. [25]

    Afxonidis, A

    E. Afxonidis, A. Karch and C. Murdia,The boundary entropy function for interface conformal field theories,JHEP07(2025) 132 [2412.05381]

  26. [26]

    Azeyanagi, A

    T. Azeyanagi, A. Karch, T. Takayanagi and E.G. Thompson,Holographic calculation of boundary entropy,JHEP03(2008) 054 [0712.1850]

  27. [27]

    Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim

    W. Israel,Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity,Nuovo Cim. B44S10 (1966) 1

  28. [28]

    Takayanagi,Holographic Dual of BCFT,Phys

    T. Takayanagi,Holographic Dual of BCFT,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 101602 [1105.5165]

  29. [29]

    Bachas, S

    C. Bachas, S. Chapman, D. Ge and G. Policastro,Energy Reflection and Transmission at 2D Holographic Interfaces,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 231602 [2006.11333]

  30. [30]

    Bachas, Z

    C. Bachas, Z. Chen and V. Papadopoulos,Steady states of holographic interfaces,JHEP11 (2021) 095 [2107.00965]

  31. [31]

    Bachas and V

    C. Bachas and V. Papadopoulos,Phases of Holographic Interfaces,JHEP04(2021) 262 [2101.12529]

  32. [32]

    Liu, H.-D

    Y. Liu, H.-D. Lyu and C.-Y. Wang,On AdS3/ICFT2 with a dynamical scalar field located on the brane,JHEP10(2024) 001 [2403.20102]

  33. [33]

    de Haro, S.N

    S. de Haro, S.N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis,Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS / CFT correspondence,Commun. Math. Phys.217(2001) 595 [hep-th/0002230]

  34. [34]

    Henningson and K

    M. Henningson and K. Skenderis,The Holographic Weyl anomaly,JHEP07(1998) 023 [hep-th/9806087]. – 27 –

  35. [35]

    Balasubramanian and P

    V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus,A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.208(1999) 413 [hep-th/9902121]

  36. [36]

    Meineri, J

    M. Meineri, J. Penedones and A. Rousset,Colliders and conformal interfaces,JHEP02 (2020) 138 [1904.10974]

  37. [37]

    Bianchi, M

    L. Bianchi, M. Meineri, R.C. Myers and M. Smolkin,Rényi entropy and conformal defects, JHEP07(2016) 076 [1511.06713]

  38. [38]

    Sakai and Y

    K. Sakai and Y. Satoh,Entanglement through conformal interfaces,JHEP12(2008) 001 [0809.4548]

  39. [39]

    Brehm and I

    E.M. Brehm and I. Brunner,Entanglement entropy through conformal interfaces in the 2D Ising model,JHEP09(2015) 080 [1505.02647]

  40. [40]

    Gutperle and J.D

    M. Gutperle and J.D. Miller,A note on entanglement entropy for topological interfaces in RCFTs,JHEP04(2016) 176 [1512.07241]

  41. [41]

    Gutperle and J.D

    M. Gutperle and J.D. Miller,Entanglement entropy at holographic interfaces,Phys. Rev. D 93(2016) 026006 [1511.08955]

  42. [42]

    X. Wen, Y. Wang and S. Ryu,Entanglement evolution across a conformal interface,J. Phys. A51(2018) 195004 [1711.02126]

  43. [43]

    K. Goto, L. Nagano, T. Nishioka and T. Okuda,Janus interface entropy and Calabi’s diastasis in four-dimensionalN= 2superconformal field theories,JHEP08(2020) 048 [2005.10833]

  44. [44]

    Q. Tang, Z. Wei, Y. Tang, X. Wen and W. Zhu,Universal entanglement signatures of interface conformal field theories,Phys. Rev. B109(2024) L041104 [2308.03646]

  45. [45]

    Afxonidis, I

    E. Afxonidis, I. Carreño Bolla, C. Hoyos and A. Karch,Connecting boundary entropy and effective central charge at holographic interfaces,2507.09171

  46. [46]

    Jokela, J

    N. Jokela, J. Kastikainen, J.M. Penín, R. Rodgers and H. Ruotsalainen,Entanglement C-functions of defects and interfaces inN= 4supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory, 2510.00123

  47. [47]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from the anti–de sitter space/conformal field theory correspondence,Phys. Rev. Lett.96(2006) 181602

  48. [48]

    Hubeny, M

    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi,A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,Journal of High Energy Physics2007(2007) 062

  49. [49]

    Brown and M

    J.D. Brown and M. Henneaux,Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,Commun. Math. Phys.104 (1986) 207

  50. [50]

    T. Kibe, A. Mukhopadhyay and P. Roy,Quantum Thermodynamics of Holographic Quenches and Bounds on the Growth of Entanglement from the Quantum Null Energy Condition, Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 191602 [2109.09914]

  51. [51]

    Banerjee, T

    A. Banerjee, T. Kibe, N. Mittal, A. Mukhopadhyay and P. Roy,Erasure Tolerant Quantum Memory and the Quantum Null Energy Condition in Holographic Systems,Phys. Rev. Lett. 129(2022) 191601 [2202.00022]

  52. [52]

    T. Kibe, A. Mukhopadhyay and P. Roy,Generalized Clausius inequalities and entanglement production in holographic two-dimensional CFTs,JHEP04(2025) 096 [2412.13256]. – 28 –

  53. [53]

    Calabrese and J.L

    P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,J. Stat. Mech. 0406(2004) P06002 [hep-th/0405152]

  54. [54]

    Oshikawa and I

    M. Oshikawa and I. Affleck,Boundary conformal field theory approach to the critical two-dimensional Ising model with a defect line,Nucl. Phys. B495(1997) 533 [cond-mat/9612187]

  55. [55]

    Quella, I

    T. Quella, I. Runkel and G.M.T. Watts,Reflection and transmission for conformal defects, JHEP04(2007) 095 [hep-th/0611296]

  56. [56]

    Chapman, D

    S. Chapman, D. Ge and G. Policastro,Holographic Complexity for Defects Distinguishes Action from Volume,JHEP05(2019) 049 [1811.12549]

  57. [57]

    Karch, Z.-X

    A. Karch, Z.-X. Luo and H.-Y. Sun,Universal relations for holographic interfaces,JHEP09 (2021) 172 [2107.02165]

  58. [58]

    Anous, M

    T. Anous, M. Meineri, P. Pelliconi and J. Sonner,Sailing past the End of the World and discovering the Island,SciPost Phys.13(2022) 075 [2202.11718]

  59. [59]

    Casini, I

    H. Casini, I. Salazar Landea and G. Torroba,Entropic g Theorem in General Spacetime Dimensions,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 111603 [2212.10575]

  60. [60]

    Casini and M

    H. Casini and M. Huerta,A c-theorem for the entanglement entropy,J. Phys. A40(2007) 7031 [cond-mat/0610375]

  61. [61]

    Chakraborty, T

    A. Chakraborty, T. Kibe, M. Molina, A. Mukhopadhyay and G. Policastro,The degrees of freedom of multiway junctions in three dimensional gravity,2509.20437

  62. [62]

    J.-Y. Shen, C. Peng and L.-X. Li,Multiway junction conditions: Booklets and webs,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 066021 [2402.00694]

  63. [63]

    J.-Y. Shen, C. Peng and L.-X. Li,Multiway Junction Conditions for Spacetimes with Multiple Boundaries,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 131601

  64. [64]

    Liu and C.-Y

    Y. Liu and C.-Y. Wang,Energy transport in holographic junctions,JHEP10(2025) 205 [2506.19553]

  65. [65]

    Banados,Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,AIP Conf

    M. Banados,Three-dimensional quantum geometry and black holes,AIP Conf. Proc.484 (1999) 147 [hep-th/9901148]

  66. [66]

    Bernard and B

    D. Bernard and B. Doyon,Conformal field theory out of equilibrium: a review,J. Stat. Mech. 1606(2016) 064005 [1603.07765]

  67. [67]

    Papadopoulos,Membranes, holography, and quantum information,2310.18521

    V. Papadopoulos,Membranes, holography, and quantum information,2310.18521. – 29 –