Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

How to Train Your Robots? The Impact of Demonstration Modality on Imitation Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.07017 v1 pith:KWFSWEU3 submitted 2025-03-10 cs.RO cs.LG

classification cs.ROcs.LG
keywords datalearningdemonstrationkinestheticperformanceteleoperationcollectedcontroller
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Imitation learning is a promising approach for learning robot policies with user-provided data. The way demonstrations are provided, i.e., demonstration modality, influences the quality of the data. While existing research shows that kinesthetic teaching (physically guiding the robot) is preferred by users for the intuitiveness and ease of use, the majority of existing manipulation datasets were collected through teleoperation via a VR controller or spacemouse. In this work, we investigate how different demonstration modalities impact downstream learning performance as well as user experience. Specifically, we compare low-cost demonstration modalities including kinesthetic teaching, teleoperation with a VR controller, and teleoperation with a spacemouse controller. We experiment with three table-top manipulation tasks with different motion constraints. We evaluate and compare imitation learning performance using data from different demonstration modalities, and collected subjective feedback on user experience. Our results show that kinesthetic teaching is rated the most intuitive for controlling the robot and provides cleanest data for best downstream learning performance. However, it is not preferred as the way for large-scale data collection due to the physical load. Based on such insight, we propose a simple data collection scheme that relies on a small number of kinesthetic demonstrations mixed with data collected through teleoperation to achieve the best overall learning performance while maintaining low data-collection effort.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. TypeTele: Releasing Dexterity in Teleoperation by Dexterous Manipulation Types

    cs.RO 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A type-guided teleoperation system that selects predefined dexterous hand poses with a language model outperforms retargeting-based teleoperation on nine real-world tasks and improves imitation learning success.

  2. TacPrint: A Wearable Fingertip Tactile Sensor for Human-to-Robot Contact Reproduction

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A low-cost wearable fingertip sensor estimates dense contact-depth maps from 24 capacitive channels and uses them to substantially improve robot grasping and wiping in human-to-robot replay.

  3. RaC: Robot Learning for Long-Horizon Tasks by Scaling Recovery and Correction

    cs.RO 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Robot policies trained on human interventions that rewind to a familiar state and then correct the mistake achieve higher long-horizon success and better data efficiency than imitation on full demonstrations alone.

  4. Ark: An Open-source Python-based Framework for Robot Learning

    cs.RO 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Ark is an open-source Python-first robotics framework providing Gym-style environments, LCM-based message passing, and a single-flag sim-to-real switch for imitation learning and deployment.

Pith tools