Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Enabling the Digital Democratic Revival: A Research Program for Digital Democracy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.16863 v1 pith:KWVS2NVO submitted 2024-01-30 cs.CY

Davide Grossi , Ulrike Hahn , Michael Mäs , Andreas Nitsche , Jan Behrens , Niclas Boehmer , Markus Brill , Ulle Endriss
show 21 more authors
Umberto Grandi Adrian Haret Jobst Heitzig Nicolien Janssens Catholijn M. Jonker Marijn A. Keijzer Axel Kistner Martin Lackner Alexandra Lieben Anna Mikhaylovskaya Pradeep K. Murukannaiah Carlo Proietti Manon Revel Élise Rouméas Ehud Shapiro Gogulapati Sreedurga Björn Swierczek Nimrod Talmon Paolo Turrini Zoi Terzopoulou Frederik Van De Putte
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CY
keywords democracydigitaldevelopmentenablingresearchtechnologyalgorithmicambition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This white paper outlines a long-term scientific vision for the development of digital-democracy technology. We contend that if digital democracy is to meet the ambition of enabling a participatory renewal in our societies, then a comprehensive multi-methods research effort is required that could, over the years, support its development in a democratically principled, empirically and computationally informed way. The paper is co-authored by an international and interdisciplinary team of researchers and arose from the Lorentz Center Workshop on ``Algorithmic Technology for Democracy'' (Leiden, October 2022).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Cost Perspective of Liquid Democracy: Feasibility and Control

    cs.GT 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For approval-based liquid democracy with voting and delegation costs, finding a budget-feasible representative set is polynomial, while bounded path length, bounded voting power, and voter-control variants become NP-h...

Pith tools