Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Binding Language Models in Symbolic Languages

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.02875 v2 pith:KZ2IM3AQ submitted 2022-10-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords bindercodexlanguagecallsin-contextonlyannotationsbinding
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Though end-to-end neural approaches have recently been dominating NLP tasks in both performance and ease-of-use, they lack interpretability and robustness. We propose Binder, a training-free neural-symbolic framework that maps the task input to a program, which (1) allows binding a unified API of language model (LM) functionalities to a programming language (e.g., SQL, Python) to extend its grammar coverage and thus tackle more diverse questions, (2) adopts an LM as both the program parser and the underlying model called by the API during execution, and (3) requires only a few in-context exemplar annotations. Specifically, we employ GPT-3 Codex as the LM. In the parsing stage, with only a few in-context exemplars, Codex is able to identify the part of the task input that cannot be answerable by the original programming language, correctly generate API calls to prompt Codex to solve the unanswerable part, and identify where to place the API calls while being compatible with the original grammar. In the execution stage, Codex can perform versatile functionalities (e.g., commonsense QA, information extraction) given proper prompts in the API calls. Binder achieves state-of-the-art results on WikiTableQuestions and TabFact datasets, with explicit output programs that benefit human debugging. Note that previous best systems are all finetuned on tens of thousands of task-specific samples, while Binder only uses dozens of annotations as in-context exemplars without any training. Our code is available at https://github.com/HKUNLP/Binder .

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SemOpt: LLM-Driven Code Optimization via Rule-Based Analysis

    cs.SE 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SemOpt generates Semgrep static-analysis rules from LLM-summarized optimization commits and uses them to locate and apply optimization strategies, outperforming retrieval-based baselines on C/C++ code.

  2. Table-r1: Self-supervised and Reinforcement Learning for Program-based Table Reasoning in Small Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Table-r1 combines a layout-transformation self-supervised task and a mix-paradigm GRPO stage so 7B/8B models outperform other small-model table reasoners and approach GPT-4o-level accuracy.

  3. LLM-Symbolic Integration for Robust Temporal Tabular Reasoning

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Schema-based SQL generation makes LLM temporal table QA more robust to counterfactual data and large tables than direct prompting, on a new synthetic benchmark.

  4. Building Task Bots with Self-learning for Enhanced Adaptability, Extensibility, and Factuality

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A thesis that combines self-learning from dialog logs, schema-guided prompting, and self-aligned factuality to build task bots with minimal human intervention.

  5. LLM Inference Enhanced by External Knowledge: A Survey

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey of methods that enhance LLM inference by integrating external structured knowledge from tables and knowledge graphs.

Pith tools