The First Principles Equation for Coherent Phonons: Dynamics and Polaron distortions

Enrico Perfetto; Gianluca Stefanucci

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 85 references

The First Principles Equation for Coherent Phonons: Dynamics and Polaron distortions

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Coherent phonons follow a first-principles equation of motion whose frequency shifts and lifetimes are exactly those of quantum phonons.

desk verdict Careful formal derivation of an exact fpEE reformulation, but the abstract overstates the domain of the quasi-phonon equation; referees should push for qualifiers and a test of the approximations. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06368 v2 pith:L37IUURG submitted 2025-02-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Gianluca Stefanucci , Enrico Perfetto This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el

keywords coherentphononsfirst-principlesEhrenfestequationnonadiabaticeffectselectron-phononcouplingBorn-Oppenheimerapproximationphononself-energypolaronsBorneffectivecharges

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes a first-principles equation of motion for coherent phonons, the lattice oscillations excited by ultrafast light or by doping. Starting from the previously derived first-principles Ehrenfest equation, it reorganizes the nuclear dynamics in terms of Born-Oppenheimer phonon frequencies and dynamical Born effective charges. The central result is that nonadiabatic electron response renormalizes the Born-Oppenheimer frequencies and adds a damping term, with the renormalization and lifetime exactly equal to those of quantum phonons. The paper also shows that the electron force on the lattice is mediated by a screened coupling, smaller than the bare electron-phonon coupling even in the adiabatic limit, and it develops a polaron theory for doping-induced lattice distortions. If correct, the derived quasi-phonon equation, Eq. (50), should replace the common phenomenological equation of motion.

What carries the argument

The central object is the first-principles Ehrenfest equation (fpEE), Eq. (27), which is exact but expressed in bare phonon quantities. The reformulation uses the phonon-irreducible density response function rather than the full response, separating the adiabatic contribution (the Born-Oppenheimer Hessian) from the nonadiabatic self-energy. The quasi-phonon approximation, Eqs. (41) and (43), takes the nonadiabatic self-energy to be diagonal and the displacement envelope slowly varying, converting the nonadiabatic term into the frequency shift $\Lambda_{\nu 0}(\Omega_{\nu 0})$ and the damping rate $\Gamma_{\nu 0}(\Omega_{\nu 0})/(2\Omega_{\nu 0})$. These objects produce the central Eq. (50), the unconventional screened coupling of Eq. (47), and the dynamical Born effective charge tensor in the optical force.

What would settle it

A direct numerical test is to evaluate the off-diagonal elements of the nonadiabatic phonon self-energy $\Delta\Pi^R_{\nu\nu'0}(\omega)$ in a real crystal: if any off-diagonal entry is comparable to the diagonal ones at the renormalized phonon frequency, the diagonal approximation of Eq. (41) breaks down and Eq. (50) is not the correct equation of motion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core claim is that coherent phonon dynamics follows a damped oscillator equation, Eq. (50), whose frequency shift and damping time are exactly the quantum-phonon self-energy expressions, so a classical Ehrenfest trajectory carries the same nonadiabatic information as a dressed quantum phonon. The driving terms are also corrected: the bare electron-phonon coupling is replaced by an unconventional dynamically screened coupling, Eq. (47), and the bare nuclear-light force becomes a force mediated by the dynamical Born effective charge tensor. In the jellium model the screened coupling vanishes at zero momentum even though the bare coupling diverges, and the polaron equations derived from the same formalism reduce to the established self-consistent many-body polaron theory.

Load-bearing premise

The whole derivation of Eq. (50) hinges on assuming that each phonon mode feels only its own nonadiabatic electron response, with no mixing between modes, and that the coherent oscillation's amplitude changes slowly; if either condition fails, the equation's frequency shift, damping term, and claimed match to quantum phonons will not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The common phenomenological coherent-phonon equation of motion should be replaced by Eq. (50); otherwise the driving force is overestimated because it uses the bare instead of the screened coupling and the full instead of the nonlinear density fluctuation.
Calculations that use the bare electron-phonon coupling to estimate coherent-phonon amplitudes will need revision; the unconventional screened coupling is smaller than the bare one even in the adiabatic limit.
Coherent phonons acquire a finite lifetime and a frequency renormalization from nonadiabatic effects, with values identical to those of quantum phonons, so the two descriptions are quantitatively interchangeable in the quasi-phonon regime.
In metals like jellium, the theory predicts no generation of zero-momentum acoustic coherent phonons, whereas the model equation with a divergent bare coupling would predict spurious generation.
The polaron theory supplies a first-principles route to doping-induced lattice distortions that reduces to the established self-consistent many-body polaron equations under stated assumptions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct extension would numerically evaluate the unconventional screened coupling of Eq. (47) in a real material and compare it with the bare coupling; if the screened coupling is not universally smaller, the paper's jellium-based picture would need qualification.
The claimed equality between coherent-phonon and quantum-phonon frequency and lifetime suggests that a generalized mapping might hold beyond the diagonal quasi-phonon approximation, though the paper only establishes the equality under that approximation.
The polaron equations of Section VI could be combined with the unconventional screened coupling to study how nonadiabatic corrections propagate into polaron binding energies, a computation the paper does not perform.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper you'll see from Stefanucci and Perfetto is a careful formal derivation, and the core result is real. They rewrite the first-principles Ehrenfest equation (fpEE) from their 2023 PRX paper as an exact equation of motion (Eq. 34) in terms of BO phonon frequencies, a phonon self-energy, a dynamical Born effective charge, and an unconventional screened e-ph coupling. That reformulation is new and seems correct. The polaron section reproduces the independent ab initio polaron theory of Lafuente-Bartolome et al. (Ref. [36]) under stated assumptions, which is a useful sanity check.

Where the paper gets into trouble is the abstract. It says the frequency renormalization and lifetime are 'identical' to quantum phonons, and that the screened coupling is 'smaller than the bare one even in the adiabatic limit.' Both claims are true only under approximations that the body of the paper states but does not justify. Eq. (41) discards off-diagonal entries of the nonadiabatic self-energy; no argument is given that they are small, and for degenerate or near-degenerate modes they are not. Eq. (44) is obtained by ignoring the time dependence of the envelope, which is a leading-order Markovian approximation; the damping term itself is of order Γ/Ω, so the equality τ = 2Ω/Γ(Ω) is only valid to leading order. For strongly coupled or soft modes it can fail. Similarly, the 'smaller than bare' result is proven only when K and K0 are diagonal in the same basis (Eq. 55); the general expression Eq. (47) has no such guarantee.

The stress-test note is right on both points. This is not a fatal flaw, because the exact Eq. (34) stands on its own, and the quasi-phonon equation is a reasonable and clearly stated approximation. But the abstract overstates the domain of validity, and a referee should ask the authors to either prove the missing inequalities or qualify the claims.

The paper has no numerics, no code, and the concurrent work by Pan et al. already derived the first two terms of Eq. (50), so the novelty is narrower than it first appears. Still, the formal derivation is careful and the polaron benchmark gives confidence that the framework is not circular. A competent group could re-implement it.

My take: send it to review, but with the expectation of a major revision that adds qualifiers and ideally tests the quasi-phonon approximation on a simple system. I'd cite Eq. (34) but not Eq. (50) without the caveats.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper reformulates the first-principles Ehrenfest equation (fpEE) previously derived by the same group (Ref. [40]) into a form expressed through Born-Oppenheimer phonon frequencies, phonon self-energies, dynamical Born effective charges, and a dynamically screened electron-phonon coupling. The central exact result is Eq. (34), an equivalent rewriting of the fpEE whose derivation is given in Appendix A. Under a set of approximations collectively called the quasi-phonon approximation, Eq. (34) reduces to Eq. (50), a damped oscillator equation whose renormalized frequency and damping time are claimed to be identical to those of quantum phonons. The paper additionally derives an unconventional screened coupling, Eq. (47), illustrates its behavior in jellium, and develops a polaron theory for doping-induced lattice distortions, showing agreement with the ab initio polaron theory of Ref. [36].

Significance. If the claims are valid within their stated domain, this is a significant contribution: it provides a first-principles equation of motion for coherent phonons that can replace the commonly used phenomenological and model-Hamiltonian equations, and it supplies a unified framework for light-induced and doping-induced coherent phonons. The strengths of the paper include the exact manipulation leading to Eq. (34), which involves no fitted parameters, the explicit identification of the unconventional screened coupling in Eq. (47), the nontrivial jellium limit in Section V B, and the detailed comparison with the independent polaron theory of Ref. [36] in Section VI. The formal derivations in Sections IV and VI are careful, and the paper is transparent about several of its assumptions, although the abstract and conclusions do not always carry the qualifications that the body of the text does.

major comments (4)

[Section V, Eqs. (41)-(46) and abstract] The central assertion that the nonadiabatic frequency shift and lifetime are 'identical to those of quantum phonons' is derived only inside the quasi-phonon approximation, and the abstract states it without qualification. Equation (41) discards the off-diagonal entries of the nonadiabatic self-energy ΔΠ with no estimate of their size; these entries are generically not small for degenerate or near-degenerate modes. Equation (44) is obtained by ignoring the time dependence of uν0(t) in Eq. (43), but the resulting Eq. (46) contains a damping term of order Γν0/Ων0, so Eq. (49) for the lifetime is valid only to leading order in Γν0/Ων0. Since Eq. (50) is presented as the first-principles replacement for the phenomenological equation, the abstract and Section VII should either explicitly state the quasi-phonon approximation and its weak-damping regime, or the authors should provide a model-based estimate of the error incurred by the diagonal and slowly-varying-envelope steps.
[Section V, Eqs. (45) and (47)] The reduction of the nonlinear density term to a time-local form rests on additional Markovian assumptions: Eq. (45) replaces Δn(r)(x′t′) by a step-like function and then neglects the contributions from the poles of ΠR D0. This step is essential because it produces the unconventional screened coupling g̃sν0 in Eq. (47), which underpins the paper's claim that current models must be revised. No criterion is given for when the omitted pole contributions are small. The authors should specify the validity condition for this Markovian approximation, for example in terms of the electronic response time relative to the phonon period, or demonstrate in a simple model that the error is negligible.
[Abstract and Section V A, Eq. (55)] The abstract states that the unconventional screened coupling is 'smaller than the bare one even in the adiabatic limit,' but the inequality is established only under the additional assumption, made immediately before Eq. (55), that K and K0 are diagonal in the same basis. In the general case, Eq. (47) is a matrix relation and no elementwise inequality follows. The abstract should carry this qualification, and Section V A should make clear that the 'always smaller' claim does not apply to the general non-diagonal case.
[Section VI, Eq. (63)] The polaron derivation passes from the exact Eq. (61) to Eq. (64) using the assumption n0_BO(x) − n0(x) ≃ 0. This assumption is stated but not justified, and it is load-bearing for the second main result: if the equilibrium Born-Oppenheimer density differs appreciably from the true density, Eq. (64) and the subsequent agreement with Ref. [36] would miss corrections. The authors should qualify the polaron claim with this assumption and, if possible, estimate the size of the omitted term (for example, from DFPT data for a representative material).

minor comments (3)

[Appendix A and throughout] The shorthand d(x′t′) is used for the product of a spatial and temporal integration variable but is never defined; writing dx′dt′ would remove ambiguity.
[Equation (44)] The symmetry properties Λν0(ω)=Λν0(−ω) and Γν0(ω)=−Γν0(−ω) are invoked after the result, but the displayed formula in Eq. (44) would be easier to follow if the intermediate step showing where each symmetry enters were shown explicitly.
[Section V B, Eq. (58)] The jellium discussion is a useful limit, but the sentence 'the fpEE correctly predicts that coherent acoustic phonons with zero momentum are not generated' should specify that this statement uses the quasi-phonon screened coupling of Eq. (47), not the exact Eq. (34) directly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central reformulation is an exact rewriting of an independently published fpEE, and the quasi-phonon equation is an explicit approximation checked against external quantum-phonon and polaron results.

full rationale

The paper's central object, Eq. (34), is derived in Appendix A from the fpEE of Ref. [40] using the Dyson equation (33) for the density-current response; the authors explicitly present it as an equivalent rewriting of Eq. (27) ("Eqs. (27) and (34) are both exact results"), with no fitted parameter and no target quantity inserted. The quasi-phonon equation (50) is obtained under stated approximations: diagonal nonadiabatic self-energy (Eq. (41)), slowly varying envelope ansatz (Eq. (43)), and Markovian treatment of the nonlinear density (Eq. (45)). The identification of Omega and tau with quantum-phonon values in Eqs. (48)-(49) is a consequence of using the same first-principles self-energy Lambda/Gamma; these functions are not fitted to coherent-phonon frequencies or lifetimes, so the "identical to quantum phonons" claim is a derived comparison rather than an assumed input. The quantum-phonon comparison is backed by Ref. [45], which is independent of the present authors, and the polaron equations are checked against Eq. (40) of the independent Ref. [36]; the note added also records external concurrent derivation of the first two terms of Eq. (50). Self-citations to Refs. [40,47,50] supply the initial fpEE and response-function identities from published derivations whose stated assumptions do not include the present target result; no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work, and no ansatz is hidden in a citation. The main caveat is a domain-of-validity concern rather than circularity: the diagonal and Markovian approximations of Section V are asserted, and for strongly coupled or soft modes the equality of coherent-phonon and quantum-phonon decay parameters may be only leading order; the abstract's unqualified wording could overstate the approximation's range. That is a correctness/robustness issue, not a reduction of the prediction to its input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters appear in the derivation; all functions (self-energies, response functions) are defined from the Hamiltonian. The main inputs are the fpEE of Ref. [40], the harmonic approximation, and several explicit approximations labeled as such in the text. No new particles or forces are postulated.

assumptions (7)

domain assumption The first-principles Ehrenfest equation (Eq. 27) from Ref. [40] is a correct description of nuclear dynamics.
The entire derivation of Eq. (34) and the quasi-phonon equation starts from this equation, which was derived in the authors' prior PRX paper. It is treated as an established result here.
domain assumption The equilibrium nuclear coordinates of the BO Hamiltonian give an excellent approximation to the true nuclear coordinates (Section II).
Used to prove the positive definiteness of K^0 and K and to justify the harmonic expansion around R0.
standard math The Dyson equation (33) for the density-current response function is valid, with the phonon-irreducible response function chi.
Standard relation from many-body perturbation theory; also derived in Refs. [40, 47].
domain assumption Harmonic approximation: only terms up to second order in nuclear displacements and density fluctuations are kept.
The fpEE and the model Hamiltonians are truncated at second order; the authors state in Section VII that anharmonic effects are neglected.
ad hoc to paper Quasi-phonon approximation: the nonadiabatic self-energy is diagonal (Eq. 41) and the displacement envelope is slowly varying (Eq. 43).
These assumptions are introduced in Section V to obtain the time-local oscillator equation Eq. (50). They are not derived or numerically validated.
ad hoc to paper For the polaron theory, the equilibrium BO density and the true density are assumed equal (Eq. 63).
This equality reduces the exact polaron equation (61) to the self-consistent mean-field form (64). The authors state it is a reasonable assumption but provide no numerical test.
ad hoc to paper The bare and BO Hessians are diagonal in the same basis for the claim that the unconventional screened coupling is smaller than the bare coupling (Eq. 55).
Used in Section V A to assert the magnitude reduction; not generally true for off-diagonal cases, and the abstract presents the smaller-coupling statement without this condition.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The First Principles Equation for Coherent Phonons: Dynamics and Polaron distortions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L37IUURG

@misc{pith2026250206368,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The First Principles Equation for Coherent Phonons: Dynamics and Polaron distortions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L37IUURG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06368}
}

read the original abstract

This paper addresses the first principles description of coherent phonons in systems subjected to optical excitations and/or doping. We reformulate the first-principles Ehrenfest equation (fpEE) [Phys. Rev. X {\bf 13}, 031026 (2023)] in terms of Born-Oppenheimer phonon frequencies and dynamical Born effective charges. We demonstrate that nonadiabatic effects renormalize the Born-Oppenheimer frequencies and introduce a damping term responsible for the finite lifetime of coherent phonons. Notably, both the frequency renormalization and the lifetime are identical to those of quantum phonons. Furthermore, we show that electrons exert a force driven by an unconventional dynamically screened electron-phonon coupling. This coupling is smaller than the bare one even in the adiabatic limit, highlighting the need to revise current models. The fpEE is also used to develop a first-principles polaron theory that describes lattice distortions induced by doping.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 78 canonical work pages

[36]

D. Shin, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, H. Jin, A. Rubio, and N. Park, Phonon-driven spin-ﬂoquet magneto-valleytronic s in mos2, Nature Communications 9, 638 (2018)

work page 2018
[40]

Trovatello, H

C. Trovatello, H. P . C. Miranda, A. Molina-S´ anchez, R. Borrego-V arillas, C. Manzoni, L. Moretti, L. Ganzer, M. Maiuri, J. Wang, D. Dumcenco, A. Kis, L. Wirtz, A. Marini, G. Soavi, A. C. Ferrari, G. Cerullo, D. Sangalli, and S. D. Conte, Strongly coupled coherent phonons in single-layer MoS2, ACS Nano 14, 5700 (2020)

work page 2020
[1]

M. Liu, H. Y . Hwang, H. Tao, A. C. Strikwerda, K. Fan, G. R. Keiser, A. J. Sternbach, K. G. West, S. Kittiwatanakul, J. Lu , S. A. Wolf, F. G. Omenetto, X. Zhang, K. A. Nelson, and R. D. Averitt, Terahertz-ﬁeld-induced insulator-to-metal tra nsition in vanadium dioxide metamaterial, Nature 487, 345 (2012)

work page 2012
[2]

C. W. Nicholson, A. L¨ ucke, W. G. Schmidt, M. Puppin, L. Ret- tig, R. Ernstorfer, and M. Wolf, Beyond the molecular movie: Dynamics of bands and bonds during a photoinduced phase transition, Science 362, 821 (2018)

work page 2018
[3]

J. G. Horstmann, H. B¨ ockmann, B. Wit, F. Kurtz, G. Storec k, and C. Ropers, Coherent control of a surface structural phas e transition, Nature 583, 232 (2020). 10

work page 2020
[4]

Cavalleri, C

A. Cavalleri, C. T´ oth, C. W. Siders, J. A. Squier, F. R´ ak si, P . Forget, and J. C. Kieffer, Femtosecond structural dynamics in vo2 during an ultrafast solid-solid phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 237401 (2001)

work page 2001
[5]

Ch´ avez-Cervantes, R

M. Ch´ avez-Cervantes, R. Krause, S. Aeschlimann, and I.Gierz, Band structure dynamics in indium wires, Phys. Rev. B 97, 201401 (2018)

work page 2018
[6]

Tomeljak, H

A. Tomeljak, H. Sch¨ afer, D. St¨ adter, M. Beyer, K. Biljakovic, and J. Demsar, Dynamics of photoinduced charge-density-wave to metal phase transition in k0.3moo3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 066404 (2009)

work page 2009

Show all 85 references

[7]

S. Wall, B. Krenzer, S. Wippermann, S. Sanna, F. Klas- ing, A. Hanisch-Blicharski, M. Kammler, W. G. Schmidt, and M. Horn-von Hoegen, Atomistic picture of charge density wave formation at surfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 186101 (2012)

2012
[8]

Similarly, we can evaluate the Hessian of EBO(R), known as the dynamical matrix, usually represented by the symbol D (the symbol H was used in Ref

ensures that K 0 is positive deﬁnite. Similarly, we can evaluate the Hessian of EBO(R), known as the dynamical matrix, usually represented by the symbol D (the symbol H was used in Ref. [40]). In the following we use D for the phonon Green’s function, and therefore we represen...
[9]

M. Rini, R. Tobey, N. Dean, J. Itatani, Y . Tomioka, Y . Toku ra, R. W. Schoenlein, and A. Cavalleri, Control of the electroni c phase of a manganite by mode-selective vibrational excitat ion, Nature 449, 72 (2007)

2007
[10]

Frigge, B

T. Frigge, B. Hafke, T. Witte, B. Krenzer, C. Streub¨ uhr , A. Samad Syed, V . Mikˇ si´ c Trontl, I. Avigo, P . Zhou, M. Ligges, D. von der Linde, U. Bovensiepen, M. Horn-von Hoegen, S. Wippermann, A. L¨ ucke, S. Sanna, U. Gerstmann, and W. G. Schmidt, Optically excited struct...

2017
[11]

M. Y . Zhang, Z. X. Wang, Y . N. Li, L. Y . Shi, D. Wu, T. Lin, S. J. Zhang, Y . Q. Liu, Q. M. Liu, J. Wang, T. Dong, and N. L. Wang, Light-induced subpicosecond lattice symmetry switch in mote2, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021036 (2019)

2019
[12]

(68) Expanding the displacements in BO normal modes, see Eq

simpliﬁes to ∑ jβ Kiα,jβUjβ = − 0<ǫs<µ∑ s ∑ cc′ kk′ As∗ ckAs c′k′ × ∫ dxgiα (r)ϕ∗ ck(x)ϕc′ k′ (x). (68) Expanding the displacements in BO normal modes, see Eq. ( 15a), and using the deﬁnitions in Eqs. ( 21) and ( 22), we can rewrite Eq. ( 68) as ω2 νqUνq = − 0<ǫs<µ∑ s ∑ cc′ k ...

2025 arXiv
[13]

Fausti, R

D. Fausti, R. I. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Di- enst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Tak- agi, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe-ordered cuprate, Science 331, 189 (2011) , https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1197294

2011 doi
[14]

Mitrano, A

M. Mitrano, A. Cantaluppi, D. Nicoletti, S. Kaiser, A. P eruc- chi, S. Lupi, P . Di Pietro, D. Pontiroli, M. Ricc` o, S. R. Clar k, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, Possible light-induced superc on- ductivity in k3c60 at high temperature, Nature 530, 461 (2016)

2016
[15]

Buzzi, D

M. Buzzi, D. Nicoletti, M. Fechner, N. Tancogne-Dejean , M. A. Sentef, A. Georges, T. Biesner, E. Uykur, M. Dressel, A. Hen- derson, T. Siegrist, J. A. Schlueter, K. Miyagawa, K. Kanoda , M.-S. Nam, A. Ardavan, J. Coulthard, J. Tindall, F. Schlawin , D. Jaksch, and A. Cavaller...

2020
[16]

Y . Zhai, P . Gong, J. Hasaien, F. Zhou, and J. Zhao, Cohere nt phonons in correlated quantum materials, Progress in Surface Science 99, 100761 (2024)

2024
[17]

H. J. Zeiger, J. Vidal, T. K. Cheng, E. P . Ippen, G. Dresse lhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, Theory for displacive excitation of c o- herent phonons, Phys. Rev. B 45, 768 (1992)

1992
[18]

A. V . Kuznetsov and C. J. Stanton, Theory of coherent pho non oscillations in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3243 (1994)

1994
[19]

Ishioka and O

K. Ishioka and O. V . Misochko, Coherent lattice oscilla tions in solids and their optical control: Part i. fundamentals and o pti- cal detection techniques, in Progress in Ultrafast Intense Laser Science: V olume V (Springer, 2009) pp. 23–46

2009
[20]

Huber, S

T. Huber, S. O. Mariager, A. Ferrer, H. Sch¨ afer, J. A. Joh n- son, S. Gr¨ ubel, A. L¨ ubcke, L. Huber, T. Kubacka, C. Dornes, C. Laulhe, S. Ravy, G. Ingold, P . Beaud, J. Demsar, and S. L. Johnson, Coherent structural dynamics of a prototypic al charge-density-wave-to-metal ...

2014
[21]

Fischer, J

P . Fischer, J. B¨ ar, M. Cimander, L. Feuerer, V . Wiecher t, O. Tereshchenko, and D. Bossini, Microscopic mechanism of displacive excitation of coherent phonons in a bulk rashba semi- conductor, Phys. Rev. B 111, L081201 (2025)

2025
[22]

Perfetto and G

E. Perfetto and G. Stefanucci, Real-time GW-Ehrenfest -Fan- Migdal method for nonequilibrium 2d materials, Nano Letters 23, 7029 (2023)

2023
[23]

H¨ ubener, U

H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, and A. Rubio, Phonon driv en ﬂoquet matter, Nano Letters 18, 1535 (2018)

2018
[24]

– recall that at clamped nuclei ˜χ00 =χclamp, see discussion below Eq. (33). Consequently, the sumK 0 0 +Π R 0 (0) is the BO Hessian K0. As we are working in the eigenbasis of the BO Hessian, K0 is diagonal, see Eq. ( 25). In deriv- ing Eq. ( 46) we also use that the quasi-pho...
[25]

de la Torre, D

A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonthermal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041002 (2021)

2021
[26]

accounts for the direct coupling between light and nuclei. 4 IV . FIRST-PRINCIPLES EHRENFEST EQUATION FOR COHERENT PHONONS The fpEE for the average value of the nuclear displacement operators can easily be derived from the commutator between the Hamiltonian and the momentum op...
[27]

( 30), allowing us to appreciate the differences between them

into a form as close as possible to Eq. ( 30), allowing us to appreciate the differences between them. We write the full density ﬂuctuation as ∆n(xt) = ∆n(1)(xt) + ∆n(r)(xt), (31) where ∆n(1) is linear in the external ﬁeld and the remainder ∆n(r) accounts for nonlinear contrib...
[28]

D. Li, C. Trovatello, S. Dal Conte, M. Nuß, G. Soavi, G. Wa ng, A. C. Ferrari, G. Cerullo, and T. Brixner, Exciton–phonon co u- pling strength in single-layer mose2 at room temperature, Na- ture Communications 12, 954 (2021)

2021
[29]

S. Mor, V . Gosetti, A. Molina-S´ anchez, D. Sangalli, S. Achilli, V . F. Agekyan, P . Franceschini, C. Giannetti, L. Sangaletti, and S. Pagliara, Photoinduced modulation of the excitonic reso - nance via coupling with coherent phonons in a layered semi- conductor, Phys. Rev. ...

2021
[30]

Perfetto, K

E. Perfetto, K. Wu, and G. Stefanucci, Theory of coheren t phonons coupled to excitons, npj 2D Materials and Applica- tions 8, 40 (2024)

2024
[31]

Franchini, M

C. Franchini, M. Reticcioli, M. Setvin, and U. Diebold, Po- larons in materials, Nature Reviews Materials 6, 560 (2021)

2021
[32]

Lakehal and I

M. Lakehal and I. Paul, Microscopic description of disp lacive coherent phonons, Phys. Rev. B 99, 035131 (2019)

2019
[33]

W. H. Sio, C. V erdi, S. Ponc´ e, and F. Giustino, Ab initio the- ory of polarons: Formalism and applications, Phys. Rev. B 99, 235139 (2019)

2019
[34]

W. H. Sio, C. V erdi, S. Ponc´ e, and F. Giustino, Polarons from ﬁrst principles, without supercells, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 246403 (2019)

2019
[35]

Lafuente-Bartolome, C

J. Lafuente-Bartolome, C. Lian, W. H. Sio, I. G. Gurtuba y, A. Eiguren, and F. Giustino, Uniﬁed approach to polarons and phonon-induced band structure renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 076402 (2022)

2022
[37]

C. Wang, X. Liu, Q. Chen, D. Chen, Y . Wang, and S. Meng, Coherent-phonon-driven intervalley scattering and rabi o scilla- tion in multivalley 2d materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 066401 (2023)

2023
[38]

T. Y . Jeong, B. M. Jin, S. H. Rhim, L. Debbichi, J. Park, Y . D. Jang, H. R. Lee, D.-H. Chae, D. Lee, Y .-H. Kim, S. Jung, and K. J. Yee, Coherent lattice vibrations in mono- and few-laye r wse2, ACS Nano 10, 5560 (2016)

2016
[39]

(40) The ﬁrst term is commonly referred to as the adiabatic contri - bution, whereas the second term is referred to as the nonadi- abatic contribution [ 45]

reads Π R νν ′0(ω) = Π R νν ′0(0) + ∆Π R νν ′0(ω). (40) The ﬁrst term is commonly referred to as the adiabatic contri - bution, whereas the second term is referred to as the nonadi- abatic contribution [ 45]. Following Refs. [ 40, 45] we further approximate the nonadiabatic co...
[41]

Bistoni, P

O. Bistoni, P . Barone, E. Cappelluti, L. Benfatto, and F . Mauri, Giant effective charges and piezoelectricity in gapped graphene, 2D Materials 6, 045015 (2019)

2019
[42]

( 34) is well approximated by Uν0(t) =uν0(t)eiΩ ν0t +u∗ ν0(t)e−iΩ ν0t, (43) whereuν0(t) is a slowly varying function of time and Ω ν0 ≥ 0 is a frequency to be determined

we assume that the solution of Eq. ( 34) is well approximated by Uν0(t) =uν0(t)eiΩ ν0t +u∗ ν0(t)e−iΩ ν0t, (43) whereuν0(t) is a slowly varying function of time and Ω ν0 ≥ 0 is a frequency to be determined. Ignoring the dependence on time of the function uν0(t) it is straightfo...
[43]

C.-Y . Wang, S. Sharma, E. K. U. Gross, and J. K. Dewhurst, Dynamical born effective charges, Phys. Rev. B 106, L180303 (2022)

2022
[44]

A. S. Alexandrov and J. T. Devreese, Advances in polaron physics (Springer, 2010)

2010
[45]

can alternatively be derived by implementing the Markov approximation ∆n(r)(x′t′) ≃ ∆n(r)(x′t) under the integral sign of Eq. ( 34). Using the above approximations – henceforth collectively referred to as the quasi-phonon approximation – the fpEE in Eq. ( 34) reduces to an ord...
[46]

Baroni, S

S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P . Giannozz i, Phonons and related crystal properties from density-funct ional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001)

2001
[47]

Stefanucci and R

G. Stefanucci and R. van Leeuwen, Nonequilibrium Many-Body Theory of Quantum Systems: A Modern Introduction , 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2025)

2025
[48]

Lafuente-Bartolome, C

J. Lafuente-Bartolome, C. Lian, W. H. Sio, I. G. Gurtuba y, A. Eiguren, and F. Giustino, Ab initio self-consistent many - body theory of polarons at all couplings, Phys. Rev. B 106, 075119 (2022)

2022
[49]

Caruso and M

F. Caruso and M. Zacharias, Quantum theory of light-dri ven coherent lattice dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 107, 054102 (2023)

2023
[50]

to semiconductors and the jellium model. A. Semiconductors In the basis of electronic Bloch functions |nk⟩, with n the band index and k the quasi-momentum, we can rewrite Eq. (50) as (omitting the explicit dependence on time) d2Uν0 dt 2 = −Ω 2 ν0Uν0 − 1 τν0 dUν0 dt − ∑ nmk ˜gs...
[51]

Emeis, S

C. Emeis, S. Jauernik, S. Dahiya, Y . Pan, C. E. Jensen, P . Hein, 11 M. Bauer, and F. Caruso, Coherent phonons and quasiparti- cle renormalization in semimetals from ﬁrst principles (2024), arXiv:2407.17118 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

2024 arXiv
[52]

Marini, S

A. Marini, S. Ponc´ e, and X. Gonze, Many-body perturba- tion theory approach to the electron-phonon interaction wi th density-functional theory as a starting point, Phys. Rev. B 91, 224310 (2015)

2015
[53]

Stefanucci, R

G. Stefanucci, R. van Leeuwen, and E. Perfetto, In and ou t- of-equilibrium ab initio theory of electrons and phonons, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031026 (2023)

2023
[54]

Binci, P

L. Binci, P . Barone, and F. Mauri, First-principles the ory of in- frared vibrational spectroscopy of metals and semimetals: Ap- plication to graphite, Phys. Rev. B 103, 134304 (2021)

2021
[55]

J. M. Ziman, Electrons and phonons: the theory of transport phenomena in solids (Clarendon, 1960)

1960
[56]

C. E. Dreyer, S. Coh, and M. Stengel, Nonadiabatic born e ffec- tive charges in metals and the drude weight, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 095901 (2022)

2022
[57]

Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from ﬁrst p rinciples, Rev

F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from ﬁrst p rinciples, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015003 (2017)

2017
[58]

Sadasivam, M

S. Sadasivam, M. K. Y . Chan, and P . Darancet, Theory of th er- mal relaxation of electrons in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 136602 (2017)

2017
[59]

Ponc´ e, E

S. Ponc´ e, E. R. Margine, and F. Giustino, Towards predi ctive many-body calculations of phonon-limited carrier mobilit ies in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. B 97, 121201 (2018)

2018
[60]

It is worth emphasizing that χR clamp in Eq

can be manip- ulated using the BO Hessian K. It is worth emphasizing that χR clamp in Eq. ( 13) is the response function at clamped nuclei of the charged neutral system. Therefore ∑ jβ Kiα,jβUjβ + ∫ dxgiα (r) ( nµ(x) −n0(x) −δn0 BO(x, U) ) = 0, (61) where δn0 BO(x, U) ≡ ∑ jβ ∫...
[61]

(64) Equation (

reduces to ∑ jβ Kiα,jβUjβ + ∫ dxgiα (r) ( nµ(x) −n0 BO(x, U) ) = 0. (64) Equation (
[62]

Stefanucci and E

G. Stefanucci and E. Perfetto, Semiconductor electron -phonon equations: A rung above Boltzmann in the many-body ladder, SciPost Phys. 16, 073 (2024)

2024
[63]

Stefanucci and E

G. Stefanucci and E. Perfetto, Excitonic Bloch equatio ns from ﬁrst principles, SciPost Phys. 18, 009 (2025)

2025
[64]

must be coupled with equations for the elec- tronic densities in such a way as to form a closed system of equations. In the quasiparticle approximation we can calcu - late the electronic densities from 8 [ − ∇2 2 +V +VH[nµ(x)] + ∑ iα giαUiα + Σ (ǫs) ] ϕs =ǫsϕs, n µ(x) = ∑ ǫs<µ...
[65]

Stefanucci and E

G. Stefanucci and E. Perfetto, Exact formula with two dy nami- cally screened electron-phonon couplings for positive pho non- linewidths approximations, Phys. Rev. B 111, 024307 (2025)

2025
[66]

P . B. Allen, Neutron spectroscopy of superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 6, 2577 (1972)

1972
[67]

Grimvall, The electron-phonon interaction in metals (North- Holland, 1981)

G. Grimvall, The electron-phonon interaction in metals (North- Holland, 1981)

1981
[68]

Haug and S

H. Haug and S. W. Koch, Quantum theory of the optical and electronic properties of semiconductors (world scientiﬁc, 2009)

2009
[69]

Kira and S

M. Kira and S. Koch, Many-body correlations and exciton ic effects in semiconductor spectroscopy, Progress in Quantum Electronics 30, 155 (2006)

2006
[70]

L. P . Kadanoff and G. Baym, Quantum Statistical Mechanics (W. A. Benjamin, Inc. New Y ork, 1962)

1962
[71]

Danielewicz, Quantum theory of nonequilibrium proc esses, I, Annals of Physics 152, 239 (1984)

P . Danielewicz, Quantum theory of nonequilibrium proc esses, I, Annals of Physics 152, 239 (1984)

1984
[72]

Caruso and D

F. Caruso and D. Novko, Ultrafast dynamics of electrons and phonons: from the two-temperature model to the time- dependent Boltzmann equation, Advances in Physics: X 7, 2095925 (2022)

2022
[73]

G. A. Garrett, T. F. Albrecht, J. F. Whitaker, and R. Merl in, Co- herent thz phonons driven by light pulses and the Sb problem: What is the mechanism?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3661 (1996)

1996
[74]

Merlin, Generating coherent thz phonons with light p ulses, Solid State Communications 102, 207 (1997) , highlights in Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science

R. Merlin, Generating coherent thz phonons with light p ulses, Solid State Communications 102, 207 (1997) , highlights in Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science

1997
[75]

T. E. Stevens, J. Kuhl, and R. Merlin, Coherent phonon ge ner- ation and the two stimulated raman tensors, Phys. Rev. B 65, 144304 (2002)

2002
[76]

W. E. Bron, J. Kuhl, and B. K. Rhee, Picosecond-laser-in duced transient dynamics of phonons in gap and znse, Phys. Rev. B 34, 6961 (1986)

1986
[77]

Dekorsy, G

T. Dekorsy, G. C. Cho, and H. Kurz, Coherent phonons in co n- densed media, in Light Scattering in Solids VIII: Fullerenes, Semiconductor Surfaces, Coherent Phonons, edited by M. Car- dona and G. G¨ untherodt (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berli n, Heidelberg, 2000) pp. 169–209

2000
[78]

D. M. Juraschek and S. F. Maehrlein, Sum-frequency ioni c ra- man scattering, Phys. Rev. B 97, 174302 (2018)

2018
[79]

G. D. Mahan, Many-Particle Physics (Springer, US, New Y ork, 2000)

2000
[80]

F¨ orst, C

M. F¨ orst, C. Manzoni, S. Kaiser, Y . Tomioka, Y . Tokura, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, Nonlinear phononics as an ultra - fast route to lattice control, Nature Physics 7, 854 (2011)

2011
[81]

Subedi, A

A. Subedi, A. Cavalleri, and A. Georges, Theory of nonli near phononics for coherent light control of solids, Phys. Rev. B 89, 220301 (2014)

2014
[82]

D. M. Juraschek, M. Fechner, and N. A. Spaldin, Ultrafas t structure switching through nonlinear phononics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 054101 (2017)

2017
[83]

von Hoegen, R

A. von Hoegen, R. Mankowsky, M. Fechner, M. F¨ orst, and A. Cavalleri, Probing the interatomic potential of solids w ith strong-ﬁeld nonlinear phononics, Nature 555, 79 (2018)

2018
[84]

Gu and J

M. Gu and J. M. Rondinelli, Nonlinear phononic control a nd emergent magnetism in mott insulating titanates, Phys. Rev. B 98, 024102 (2018)

2018
[85]

Henstridge, M

M. Henstridge, M. F¨ orst, E. Rowe, M. Fechner, and A. Cav - alleri, Nonlocal nonlinear phononics, Nature Physics 18, 457 (2022)

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [36]

D. Shin, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, H. Jin, A. Rubio, and N. Park, Phonon-driven spin-ﬂoquet magneto-valleytronic s in mos2, Nature Communications 9, 638 (2018)

work page 2018

[2] [40]

Trovatello, H

C. Trovatello, H. P . C. Miranda, A. Molina-S´ anchez, R. Borrego-V arillas, C. Manzoni, L. Moretti, L. Ganzer, M. Maiuri, J. Wang, D. Dumcenco, A. Kis, L. Wirtz, A. Marini, G. Soavi, A. C. Ferrari, G. Cerullo, D. Sangalli, and S. D. Conte, Strongly coupled coherent phonons in single-layer MoS2, ACS Nano 14, 5700 (2020)

work page 2020

[3] [1]

M. Liu, H. Y . Hwang, H. Tao, A. C. Strikwerda, K. Fan, G. R. Keiser, A. J. Sternbach, K. G. West, S. Kittiwatanakul, J. Lu , S. A. Wolf, F. G. Omenetto, X. Zhang, K. A. Nelson, and R. D. Averitt, Terahertz-ﬁeld-induced insulator-to-metal tra nsition in vanadium dioxide metamaterial, Nature 487, 345 (2012)

work page 2012

[4] [2]

C. W. Nicholson, A. L¨ ucke, W. G. Schmidt, M. Puppin, L. Ret- tig, R. Ernstorfer, and M. Wolf, Beyond the molecular movie: Dynamics of bands and bonds during a photoinduced phase transition, Science 362, 821 (2018)

work page 2018

[5] [3]

J. G. Horstmann, H. B¨ ockmann, B. Wit, F. Kurtz, G. Storec k, and C. Ropers, Coherent control of a surface structural phas e transition, Nature 583, 232 (2020). 10

work page 2020

[6] [4]

Cavalleri, C

A. Cavalleri, C. T´ oth, C. W. Siders, J. A. Squier, F. R´ ak si, P . Forget, and J. C. Kieffer, Femtosecond structural dynamics in vo2 during an ultrafast solid-solid phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 237401 (2001)

work page 2001

[7] [5]

Ch´ avez-Cervantes, R

M. Ch´ avez-Cervantes, R. Krause, S. Aeschlimann, and I.Gierz, Band structure dynamics in indium wires, Phys. Rev. B 97, 201401 (2018)

work page 2018

[8] [6]

Tomeljak, H

A. Tomeljak, H. Sch¨ afer, D. St¨ adter, M. Beyer, K. Biljakovic, and J. Demsar, Dynamics of photoinduced charge-density-wave to metal phase transition in k0.3moo3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 066404 (2009)

work page 2009