Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Vertical Structure and Dynamics of a Galactic Disk

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A galactic disk's vertical structure is set by the coupled gravity of stars, gas, and dark halo, not by a single stellar component alone.

desk verdict A useful pedagogical review of the author's own multi-component disk plus halo model, but the abstract overstates the flaring claim and the review is narrower than 'comprehensive'. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.02062 v1 pith:L76ZSHGK submitted 2025-07-02 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxies:structurekinematicsanddynamicsISMhalosgalaxy:diskverticalstellarflaring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the vertical structure of a galactic disk is set by the joint, self-consistent gravity of a multi-component disk (stars, HI, and H2 gas) embedded in a dark matter halo, rather than by the classic single-component isothermal disk. Solving the coupled vertical hydrostatic and Poisson equations for all components at once yields stellar density profiles that are more concentrated toward the mid-plane, steeper than the standard $\mathrm{sech}^2$ profile, and consistent with modern observations. The same model explains why the inner HI layer is nearly constant in thickness and why the stellar disk flares by a factor of a few within the optical disk. It also turns observed HI scale heights into constraints on the dark matter halo's density profile and shape.

What carries the argument

The central object is the coupled vertical hydrostatic-Poisson system for a gravitationally coupled multi-component disk plus halo: for each isothermal component the vertical pressure gradient balances the summed vertical gravitational forces of all components and the halo, while the disk Poisson equation sums the vertical second derivatives of the component potentials. The key quantity is the redistributed vertical density profile $\rho_i(z)$ of each component, whose half-width at half-maximum defines the disk scale height. The operative identity is that hydrostatic support of a component depends only on that component's own velocity dispersion, whereas the gravitational force it feels is the sum over all components; hence a thin gas layer or a massive halo compresses any higher-dispersion component embedded in it.

What would settle it

Measure the vertical random motions of old disk stars at several radii between 17 and 25 kpc in the Milky Way with modern astrometric and spectroscopic data; if these motions continue to decline below the ~7 km/s gas value instead of flattening, the sharp flare predicted by the model beyond 17 kpc is not supported. A second decisive test is deep edge-on imaging of a flaring-candidate galaxy fit without the constant-scale-height assumption, to see whether a single $\mathrm{sech}^2$ profile with constant thickness actually fits the full radial range.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that each disk component's vertical density profile is not a free functional fit but the solution of the coupled joint Poisson-hydrostatic balance equations for stars, HI, and H2 in the halo's gravitational field. The additional vertical force from the thin, low-dispersion gas layers and from the dark matter halo pulls the stellar distribution back toward the mid-plane, so the coupled stellar profile has a higher mid-plane density, a smaller scale height, and a steeper fall-off than the stars-alone $\mathrm{sech}^2$ case. Gas provides the dominant pinching in the inner disk and the halo in the outer disk. The model's outer-disk solution predicts a stellar scale height that grows by roughly a factor of three between 4 and 22 kpc, and, when matched to observed HI scale heights and rotation curves, a dark matter halo with a steeply falling density profile rather than a shallow isothermal cusp.

Load-bearing premise

The sharp outer-disk flare beyond about 17 kpc depends on the assumption that the random vertical motions of stars stop declining at the gas-dispersion floor and stay constant; if those motions keep falling with radius, the predicted flaring curve would be substantially different.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The routinely assumed $\mathrm{sech}^2$ vertical profile with a constant scale height is not a reliable description of a real galactic disk; the coupled model gives steeper profiles whose scale height increases with radius.
  • Including gas self-gravity and a small radial gradient in the HI velocity dispersion reproduces the nearly constant HI scale height observed in the inner Milky Way, resolving an old puzzle.
  • Beyond about 17 kpc the dark matter halo's vertical force dominates, compressing both stars and HI gas; this lowers the HI thickness by factors of 3-4 and makes the outer disk more resistant to tidal distortion.
  • Using the observed HI scale height together with the rotation curve as joint constraints selects a dark matter halo with a steeply falling density profile ($p \approx 2$) rather than a standard isothermal halo for the Milky Way.
  • The same pressure-equilibrium argument predicts a generic stellar-disk flare by a factor of a few within the optical radius whenever the stellar velocity dispersion declines more slowly than the surface density ($R_v > 2 R_D$).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: Existing single-component fits to edge-on galaxies that assume $\mathrm{sech}^2$ and constant scale height likely underestimate how much the stellar layer thickens outward, so derived disk masses and mass-to-light ratios from such fits may need revisiting.
  • Inference: The sharp outer-disk flare predicted beyond 17 kpc rests on the assumption that stellar random motions stop declining at the gas-dispersion floor; a direct measurement of those motions at larger radii is the cleanest way to test that hinge.
  • Inference: With integral-field stellar kinematics, the same model could be inverted for external galaxies to predict radial scale-height maps, offering a stacking-free way to look for flaring in edge-on systems.
  • Inference: Because the halo's vertical compression raises mid-plane gas density at large radii, the model points to a gravitational mechanism for triggering star formation in outer disks, independent of spiral-arm compression.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This review presents the vertical structure of galactic disks in hydrostatic equilibrium, centering on the multi-component disk plus halo model: stars, HI, and H2 are treated as gravitationally coupled isothermal components embedded in a dark-matter halo. The paper derives the classical sech^2 result, generalizes it to the coupled system, applies the model to the Milky Way, NGC 891, NGC 4565, UGC 7321, and dwarf galaxies, and argues that gas and halo vertically constrain the stellar distribution, that stellar disks flare radially, and that HI scale heights can be used as a constraint on the dark-matter halo profile. The abstract claims that a typical stellar disk flares by a factor of a few within the visible radial extent and that this strongly questions the sech^2 profile and constant scale height.

Significance. If the central mechanism is correct, the paper identifies a genuinely important physical effect: the additional vertical gravity from gas and dark matter compresses the stellar distribution, making it steeper than the standard one-component sech^2 profile and explaining observed near-midplane excesses without an ad hoc density profile. The derivation in Sections 4.2.1-4.2.2 is standard and clearly presented, the numerical procedure is sufficiently detailed to be reproducible, and the review usefully collects observational caveats, e.g., the projection problems in edge-on galaxy studies (Section 2.1.1). The paper is less strong as a quantitative prediction: the headline flaring factor depends on a hand-imposed saturation of the stellar velocity dispersion, and some of the claimed observational agreement arises from fitting the same data that later serve as validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Sections 4.2.3 and 4.2.6; Fig. 12; Table 2] The abstract's claim that a typical stellar disk flares by a factor of a few within the visible radial extent is not supported by the model's own Fig. 12 inside the optical disk. The text of Section 4.2.6 states that the HWHM increases by roughly 50% from R=4 to 16 kpc, while the factor of 3.3 quoted from Table 2 occurs at R=22 kpc, well beyond the nominal optical radius of about 4 R_D ~ 13 kpc for R_D=3.2 kpc. The steep flaring beyond R=17 kpc is produced directly by the imposed saturation of the stellar vertical velocity dispersion at the gas-dispersion value (Section 4.2.3), not by the coupled Poisson-hydrostatic equations themselves. If the true stellar dispersion continues to decline beyond 17 kpc rather than saturating, or saturates at a different radius, the flaring factor changes substantially. The physical constraining mechanism is not in question; the quantitative 'factor of few within the visible disk' claim should be revised or explicitly conditioned on the adopted saturation assumption.
  2. [Sections 4.2.4 and 4.3.2] Some of the claimed agreement between model and observation is partly circular, because input parameters are tuned to reproduce the same data. In Section 4.2.4, the HI vertical velocity dispersion gradient is chosen specifically to give the best fit between the model HWHM and the observed HI scale heights; in Section 4.3.2, the halo density parameters are obtained by requiring the model HI scale heights and rotation curve to match the observed values. The paper does repeatedly use the language of 'constraints' and 'best-fit', which is honest, but when the same Section summarizes the result as 'in good agreement with observations', that agreement is calibration rather than prediction. The robust part of the paper, namely that gas and halo add vertical gravity and steepen the stellar profile, follows from the equations and observed surface densities and does not depend on this circularity; the halo-shape and halo-profile conclusions, however, should be presented as fits with a stated degeneracy, not as independent determinations.
  3. [Section 5.2 and Section 5.3.1] The discussion of 'sharp flaring in the outer disk' presents the saturation of the stellar velocity dispersion as physically motivated because stars cannot have a lower dispersion than the gas from which they form. This argument is plausible but not a measured constraint in the outer disk, and Section 5.2 does not quantify the sensitivity of the flaring factor to the saturation radius or to the value of the floor dispersion. A test would be to rerun the model with the dispersion declining as an exponential without saturation, or with saturation at R=20-25 kpc, and to show how Fig. 12 and Table 2 change. Until such a sensitivity analysis is provided, the sharp outer-disk flaring should not be presented as a generic, robust prediction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.2.7, Fig. 16 caption] The text says the scale height increases linearly from 0.75 to 1.25 kpc, while the Fig. 16 caption says from 0.5 to 1.25 kpc; the two values should be harmonized.
  2. [Section 4.3.2, UGC 7321 paragraph] The text states that observations are known up to R=5.6 pc; this should be 5.6 kpc.
  3. [Section 4.2.6, Fig. 13 and surrounding text] The notation 'exponent 2/n' is used for the ordinate of Fig. 13, while the text sometimes refers to the best-fit exponent and sometimes to the parameter n itself; a sentence defining 'exponent 2/n' in terms of Eq. (4.7) would remove ambiguity.
  4. [Section 4.3.1, Eq. (4.12)-(4.13)] For the flat-rotation-curve thick disk case, Eq. (4.13) looks identical to the thin-disk equation except that the halo density appears in the source term; it would help the reader to state explicitly that the disk and halo Poisson equations remain coupled through the radial-term condition even when the net radial term is zero.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The central gas-plus-halo constraining mechanism follows independently from the coupled Poisson-hydrostatic equations, but the quantitative flaring claim is partly built in through the hand-imposed saturation of the stellar velocity dispersion at R=17 kpc, and the inner-Galaxy HI scale-height agreement is partly a fit to the same data.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4.2.4, 'Results for vertical scale heights in the inner Galaxy' (discussion of Fig. 7)]
    "A small linear gradient of -0.8 km s−1 kpc−1 was tried, starting with a value of HI velocity dispersion of 8 km s−1 at R = 8.5 kpc. The resulting scale height values vs. R for HI, H2 and stars are given in the three panels in Fig 7. This value of the velocity gradient was chosen since it was found to give the best-fit between the model HWHM and the observed values for HI for the range 2-12 kpc."

    The radial gradient of the HI velocity dispersion is a free input that is tuned to minimize the difference between the model HWHM and the observed HI scale heights over 2-12 kpc. The subsequent statements that the model 'shows an overall agreement with observations' and 'explains the old puzzle of the nearly constant HI scale height' are therefore not independent tests of the model: a different adopted gradient would produce a different degree of agreement. The underlying coupled-equation mechanism is not circular, but this particular quantitative validation reduces to a fit of the same data it claims to reproduce.

  2. self definitional [Section 4.2.6, 'Detailed results for stellar density distribution in the outer Galaxy' (Fig. 12 and Table 2), and Abstract]
    "Beyond R = 17 kpc, the stellar disk flares steeply because the stellar velocity dispersion saturates (by choice) to the gas dispersion value beyond this radius (see Section 4.2.3). ... A typical stellar disk is shown to flare by a factor of few within the visible radial extent of the disk."

    The sharp flaring beyond 17 kpc is not derived from the coupled Poisson-hydrostatic equations alone; it is imposed by the adopted saturation of the stellar vertical velocity dispersion at R=17 kpc. The abstract's 'factor of few within the visible radial extent' is only reached at R=22 kpc (factor 3.3 in the quoted Table 2), while within the optical disk (4RD~13 kpc) Fig. 12 shows an increase of only about 50%. The headline flaring claim is therefore largely equivalent to the hand-imposed input prescription rather than a standalone prediction of the model.

full rationale

The paper's central mechanism—that gas and dark-matter-halo gravity vertically constrain the stellar distribution, producing a steeper profile than the stars-alone sech^2 case—follows directly from solving the joint Poisson and hydrostatic-balance equations with observed surface densities and dispersions, and is not circular. However, two quantitative claims are partially circular. First, the inner-Galaxy HI scale-height agreement is obtained after tuning the HI velocity dispersion gradient to give the best fit to exactly those observed scale heights (Section 4.2.4), so the agreement is partly a fit. Second, the strong outer-disk flaring and the abstract's 'factor of few within the visible radial extent' depend on the hand-imposed saturation of the stellar velocity dispersion at R=17 kpc (Section 4.2.6), which the paper itself describes as 'by choice'; within the optical radius the model's own figure shows only a modest ~50% increase, so the generic flaring statement overstates what is derived from the equations alone. These are partial circularities in specific quantitative validations, not a collapse of the whole derivation chain; the physical constraining effect and the halo-constraint application have independent content. Hence a moderate score of 4 is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model is a boundary-value problem requiring inputs for surface densities and velocity dispersions. Many inputs come from observations, but several key parameters (HI dispersion gradient, Rv, saturation radius, halo profile) are tuned to match the very observations the model is then said to explain. This does not invalidate the central mechanism, but it reduces the strength of the claimed agreement.

free parameters (6)
  • HI vertical velocity dispersion gradient = -0.8 km/s/kpc
    Chosen to give the best-fit of model HI scale heights to observed values (Section 4.2.4).
  • Stellar velocity dispersion radial scale length Rv (Milky Way) = 8.7 kpc
    Taken from observed radial velocity dispersion data [56], but the vertical-to-radial ratio is assumed constant at 0.45.
  • Saturation radius for stellar velocity dispersion = 17 kpc
    Assumed so that stellar dispersion does not fall below gas dispersion; drives outer disk flare (Section 4.2.3).
  • Halo density profile parameters (p, rho0h, Rc) for outer Galaxy = p=2, rho0h=0.035 Msun/pc^3, Rc=9.4 kpc
    Best-fit to observed rotation curve and HI scale heights (Section 4.3.2).
  • Rv/RD for NGC 891 and NGC 4565 = 2-2.5 and 2.5-3 respectively
    Constrained from the observed spread in scale height (Section 4.2.7).
  • Rv for UGC 7321 = 3.2 RD
    Fitted to match observed stellar scale height vs. R (Section 4.3.2).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Each disk component (stars, HI, H2) is isothermal and in vertical hydrostatic equilibrium.
    Used throughout Section 4.1-4.2; velocity dispersion constant along z for each component.
  • domain assumption The disk is thin: only the z-term in the Poisson equation matters for the disk.
    Section 3.1 and 4.2.1; this justifies the local 1-D treatment. It is relaxed in Section 4.3.
  • domain assumption The dark matter halo is unaffected by the disk and acts as a fixed external potential.
    Section 4.2.1, after Eq. (4.2); the halo is treated as a reservoir.
  • domain assumption The disk components are co-spatial, concentric, and coplanar.
    Section 4.1.2; this simplifies the coupled equations.
  • domain assumption The stellar velocity ellipsoid is aligned with spherical polar coordinates, so the cross term vRvz = (sigma_R^2 - sigma_z^2)(z/R).
    Section 4.4.1, after Eq. (4.16); used in the complete Jeans model.
  • standard math Standard Newtonian gravity and the Poisson equation apply.
    Throughout.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Vertical Structure and Dynamics of a Galactic Disk." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/L76ZSHGK

@misc{pith2026250702062,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Vertical Structure and Dynamics of a Galactic Disk},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/L76ZSHGK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.02062}
}
read the original abstract

Most of the visible mass in a typical spiral galaxy is distributed in a thin disk, with a radial extent much larger than its thickness. While the planar disk structure, including non-axisymmetric features such as spiral structure, has been studied extensively, the vertical structure has not received comparable attention. This review aims to give a comprehensive, pedagogic introduction to the rich topic of vertical structure of a galactic disk in hydrostatic equilibrium and discuss the theoretical developments in this field in the context of recent observations. A realistic multi-component disk plus halo model of a galaxy has been developed and studied by us in detail. This takes account of both stars and interstellar gas, treated as isothermal components with different velocity dispersions, which are gravitationally coupled; further, the disk is in the gravitational field of the dark matter halo. This review focuses on this model and the results from it in different physical cases. The gas and halo crucially affect the resulting self-consistent stellar distribution such that it is vertically constrained to be closer to the mid-plane and has a steeper profile than in the standard one-component case, in agreement with modern observations. A typical stellar disk is shown to flare by a factor of few within the visible radial extent of the disk. These robust results question the sech^2 profile and a constant scale height, routinely used in the literature, for convenience. In an important application, the observed HI gas scale height is used as a constraint on the model which helps determine the shape and the density profile of the dark matter halo for galaxies. Finally, we outline some key, open questions which can be addressed in the near future using the above model, and new observational data -- for example, from IFU surveys and JWST -- for a better understanding of this topic.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.02062 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A block of four typical edge-on galaxies: NGC 891 (top left panel); NGC 4565 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Plot of |Kz|, the vertical gravitational force per unit mass due to a cloud complex, and that due to the undisturbed stellar disc, versus z, the distance from the mid-plane, at the complex centre. For z < 200 pc, the force due to the complex dominates over that due to the disk. The ratio is a maximum, equal to 9.5, at the outer edge of the complex, at z = 60 pc. Source: Taken from [112] ∂(Kz)s ∂z + ∂(Kz)complex ∂z +… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Plot of self-consistent density for self-gravitating, undisturbed stellar disk [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (32 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Plot of vertical scale height (HWHM) for the modified stellar distribution for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic diagram of the distribution of the three disk components: namely, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The plot of scale height (HWHM) vs. R for interstellar HI, H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p045_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The plot of scale height (HWHM) vs. R for HI, H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p047_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Plot of vertical self-gravitational force per unit mass, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Self-consistent vertical density for stars vs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p051_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Plot of gravitational force per unit mass, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p052_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Self-consistent vertical density of stars vs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p053_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Plot of the model scale height (HWHM) of the vertical stellar density distribu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p055_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Plot of the best-fit exponent 2/n vs. |∆z| for the range of z values over which the model vertical density distribution for stars is fitted by a distribution of type sech2/n; shown for R = 6 kpc. The value of n varies with |∆z|, hence n is not a robust indicator of th…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Plot of the best-fit value of the exponent 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p058_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Self-consistent vertical density distribution of HI gas vs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Plot of surface brightness, I vs. z for NGC 891 from [22] who used their data and obtained this composite z-profile (the top curve in this figure) by vertically shifting the individual z-profiles at different R into coincidence at z’= 1.5 kpc. The vertical bars indica…
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Plot of resulting stellar scale height (HWHM) vs. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p065_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Plot of calculated HI scale height (HWHM) vs. R in the outer Galaxy. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p075_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Plot of HI scale height vs.R in the outer Galaxy. The best fit to the data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p077_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Plot of results for the HI scale height (HWHM) vs. R for two dwarf galaxies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p079_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Plot of resulting stellar vertical density, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p087_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Plot of resulting self-consistent vertical density distribution, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p092_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: The non-isothermal density vertical density distribution of stars versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p094_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: The resulting non-isothermal vertical stellar distribution obtained for a velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p095_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Plot of the vertical force per unit mass, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p106_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Plot of the integrand −zρ(z)Kz of the gravitational potential energy per unit area versus z for stars and gas (HI) at R= 8.5 kpc; obtained for a one-component case and then for the coupled case. The left panel shows the plot of energy integrand for stars-alone (solid …
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Plot of work done, Ez, to raise a unit test mass from the mid-plane to a vertical height z versus z, at R=8.5 kpc: for the stars-alone case against its self-gravity (solid curve); for gas-alone case against its own self-gravity (dashed line); and for stars or gas in t…
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: Calculated vertical scale height for the atomic hydrogen gas (HI) (solid line) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p129_28.png]
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Resulting prolate-shaped isodensity contours (on the R-z plane) of the best-fit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p130_29.png]
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: A schematic diagram of bending waves and breathing modes, which illustrates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p146_30.png]
Figure 31
Figure 31. Figure 31: A striking example of a stellar warp in the galaxy ESO 510-G13. The image [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p148_31.png]
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: Dust corrugations in NGC 4302: The top left panel shows the Spitzer/IRAC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p149_32.png]
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: Breathing motions: Plot of mean velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p151_33.png]
Figure 34
Figure 34. Figure 34: Phase space spiral in the Milky Way [343]: Plot of distribution of stars in the vertical position-velocity (z − vz) phase space for stars sampled within the galactocentric radial range of 8.24-8.44 kpc; coloured as a function of median azimuthal velocity, vϕ, in bins …
Figure 35
Figure 35. Figure 35: CALIFA Survey results for stellar velocity dispersion in galaxies [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p157_35.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The Edge-on Galaxies in the DESI survey (EGIDE): sample building and photometry

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    The EGIDE project releases a tenfold larger catalogue of edge-on galaxies with griz photometry, stellar masses, redshifts and star formation rates, finding that red-sequence galaxies are thicker than blue-cloud ones a...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

294 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Sandage, The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies, 1961

    A. Sandage, The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies, 1961

  2. [2]

    Binney, S

    J. Binney, S. Tremaine, Galactic dynamics, 1987

  3. [3]

    E. P. Hubble, Realm of the Nebulae, 1936

  4. [4]

    Sofue, V

    Y. Sofue, V. Rubin, Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 39 (2001) 137–174. doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro. 39.1.137. arXiv:astro-ph/0010594

  5. [5]

    J. H. Oort, Stellar Dynamics, in: A. Blaauw, M. Schmidt (Eds.), Galactic structure. Edited by Adriaan Blaauw and Maarten Schmidt. Published by the University of Chicago Press, 1965, p. 455

  6. [6]

    H. Mo, F. C. van den Bosch, S. White, Galaxy Formation and Evolu- tion, 2010

  7. [7]

    J. Silk, A. Di Cintio, I. Dvorkin, Galaxy Formation, in: Proceedings of the International School of Physics ’Enrico Fermi’ Course 186 ’New Horizons for Observational Cosmology’ Vol. 186, volume 186, 2014, pp. 137–187. doi:10.3254/978-1-61499-476-3-137 . arXiv:1312.0107

  8. [8]

    P. C. van der Kruit, K. C. Freeman, Galaxy Disks, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 49 (2011) 301–371. doi: 10.1146/ annurev-astro-083109-153241 . arXiv:1101.1771

Show all 294 references
  1. [9]

    Bland-Hawthorn, O

    J. Bland-Hawthorn, O. Gerhard, The Galaxy in Context: Structural, Kinematic, and Integrated Properties, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 54 (2016) 529–596. doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023441 . arXiv:1602.07702

  2. [10]

    A. J. Deason, V. Belokurov, Galactic Archaeology with Gaia, New Astronomy Review 99 (2024) 101706. doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2024. 101706. arXiv:2402.12443

  3. [11]

    J. A. S. Hunt, E. Vasiliev, Milky Way dynamics in light of Gaia, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2501.04075. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.04075. arXiv:2501.04075. 176

  4. [12]

    Spitzer, Lyman, The Dynamics of the Interstellar Medium

    J. Spitzer, Lyman, The Dynamics of the Interstellar Medium. III. Galactic Distribution., Astrophys. J. 95 (1942) 329. doi: 10.1086/ 144407

  5. [13]

    G. L. Camm, Self-gravitating star systems, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 110 (1950) 305. doi: 10.1093/mnras/110.4.305

  6. [14]

    P. C. van der Kruit, The three-dimensional distribution of light and mass in disks of spiral galaxies., Astron. Astrophys. 192 (1988) 117– 127

  7. [15]

    Barteldrees, R

    A. Barteldrees, R. J. Dettmar, Parameters of stellar disks from CCD surface photometry of edge-on galaxies, Astron. Astrophys. Supple- ment 103 (1994) 475–502

  8. [16]

    C. A. Narayan, C. J. Jog, Vertical scaleheights in a grav- itationally coupled, three-component Galactic disk, Astron. Astrophys. 394 (2002) 89–96. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021128. arXiv:astro-ph/0210239

  9. [17]

    P. M. W. Kalberla, Dark Matter in the Milky Way. I. The Isothermal Disk Approximation, Astrophys. J. 588 (2003) 805–823. doi: 10.1086/ 374330

  10. [18]

    Banerjee, C

    A. Banerjee, C. J. Jog, The Origin of Steep Vertical Stellar Distribution in the Galactic Disk, Astrophys. J. 662 (2007) 335–340. doi: 10.1086/ 517605. arXiv:astro-ph/0703169

  11. [19]

    Sarkar, C

    S. Sarkar, C. J. Jog, The constraining effect of gas and the dark matter halo on the vertical stellar distribution of the Milky Way, Astron. Astrophys. 617 (2018) A142. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 201833510. arXiv:1808.02047

  12. [20]

    Sarkar, C

    S. Sarkar, C. J. Jog, General model of vertical distribution of stars in the Milky Way using complete Jeans equations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 492 (2020) 628–633. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3512. arXiv:1912.08829

  13. [21]

    Sarkar, C

    S. Sarkar, C. J. Jog, Vertical stellar density distribution in a non- isothermal galactic disc, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499 (2020) 2523–

  14. [22]

    P. C. van der Kruit, L. Searle, Surface photometry of edge-on spiral galaxies. I - A model for the three-dimensional distribution of light in galactic disks., Astron. Astrophys. 95 (1981) 105–115

  15. [23]

    Y. Jia, C. Yang, Y. Chen, C. Du, G. Zhao, Investigating the ver- tical distribution of the disk as a function of radial action: Results from simulations, Astron. Astrophys. 692 (2024) A167. doi: 10.1051/ 0004-6361/202452294. arXiv:2411.12432

  16. [24]

    Thulasidharan, E

    L. Thulasidharan, E. D’Onghia, R. Benjamin, R. Drimmel, E. Pog- gio, A. Queiroz, The Age-Thickness Relation of the Milky Way Disk: A Tracer of Galactic Merging History, arXiv e- prints (2024) arXiv:2412.12304. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.12304. arXiv:2412.12304

  17. [25]

    J. H. Oort, Note on the determination of K z and on the mass density near the Sun., B.A.N. 15 (1960) 45

  18. [26]

    Burstein, Structure and origin of S0 galaxies

    D. Burstein, Structure and origin of S0 galaxies. III. The luminosity distribution perpendicular to the plane of the disks in S0’s., Astrophys. J. 234 (1979) 829–836. doi: 10.1086/157563

  19. [27]

    Sheth, M

    K. Sheth, M. Regan, J. L. Hinz, A. Gil de Paz, K. Men´ endez-Delmestre, J.-C. Mu˜ noz-Mateos, M. Seibert, T. Kim, E. Laurikainen, H. Salo, D. A. Gadotti, J. Laine, T. Mizusawa, L. Armus, E. Athanassoula, A. Bosma, R. J. Buta, P. Capak, T. H. Jarrett, D. M. Elmegreen, B. G. Elm...

  20. [28]

    P. C. van der Kruit, L. Searle, Surface photometry of edge-on spi- ral galaxies. II - The distribution of light and colour in the disk and spheroid of NGC 891., Astron. Astrophys. 95 (1981) 116–126

  21. [29]

    de Grijs, R

    R. de Grijs, R. F. Peletier, The shape of galaxy disks: how the scale height increases with galactocentric distance., Astron. Astro- phys. 320 (1997) L21–L24. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9702215. arXiv:astro-ph/9702215. 178

  22. [30]

    K. C. Freeman, On the Disks of Spiral and S0 Galaxies, Astrophys. J. 160 (1970) 811. doi: 10.1086/150474

  23. [31]

    Spitzer, Physical processes in the interstellar medium, 1978

    L. Spitzer, Physical processes in the interstellar medium, 1978. doi: 10. 1002/9783527617722

  24. [32]

    B. T. Draine, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium, 2011

  25. [33]

    Kregel, P

    M. Kregel, P. C. van der Kruit, R. de Grijs, Flattening and trunca- tion of stellar discs in edge-on spiral galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 334 (2002) 646–668. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05556.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0204154

  26. [34]

    S. P. C. Peters, P. C. van der Kruit, R. J. Allen, K. C. Freeman, The shape of dark matter haloes - V. Analysis of observations of edge-on galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 464 (2017) 65–84. doi: 10.1093/ mnras/stw2101. arXiv:1605.08209

  27. [35]

    C. A. Narayan, C. J. Jog, Origin of radially increasing stellar scale- height in a galactic disk, Astron. Astrophys. Lett. 390 (2002) L35–L38. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020961. arXiv:astro-ph/0207453

  28. [36]

    Rohlfs, H

    K. Rohlfs, H. J. Wiemer, On the disk-thickness of spiral galaxies, Astron. Astrophys. 112 (1982) 116–119

  29. [37]

    A. V. Kasparova, I. Y. Katkov, I. V. Chilingarian, An excessively massive thick disc of the enormous edge-on lenticular galaxy NGC 7572, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 493 (2020) 5464–5478. doi: 10.1093/mnras/ staa611. arXiv:1912.04887

  30. [38]

    E. M. Xilouris, Y. I. Byun, N. D. Kylafis, E. V. Paleologou, J. Papa- mastorakis, Are spiral galaxies optically thin or thick?, Astron. Astro- phys. 344 (1999) 868–878. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9901158. arXiv:astro-ph/9901158

  31. [39]

    S. Vig, S. K. Ghosh, D. K. Ojha, Warp signatures of the Galactic disk as seen in mid infrared from Midcourse Space Experiment, Astron. Astrophys. 436 (2005) 867–877. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052920. arXiv:astro-ph/0503388. 179

  32. [40]

    L´ opez-Corredoira, A

    M. L´ opez-Corredoira, A. Cabrera-Lavers, F. Garz´ on, P. L. Hammers- ley, Old stellar Galactic disc in near-plane regions according to 2MASS: Scales, cut-off, flare and warp, Astron. Astrophys. 394 (2002) 883–899. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021175. arXiv:astro-ph/0208236

  33. [41]

    L´ opez-Corredoira, J

    M. L´ opez-Corredoira, J. Molg´ o, Flare in the Galactic stellar outer disc detected in SDSS-SEGUE data, Astron. Astrophys. 567 (2014) A106. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423706. arXiv:1405.7649

  34. [42]

    J. G. A. Wouterloot, J. Brand, W. B. Burton, K. K. Kwee, IRAS sources beyond the solar circle. II. Distribution in the galactic warp., Astron. Astrophys. 230 (1990) 21–36

  35. [43]

    Florido, E

    E. Florido, E. Battaner, A. Guijarro, F. Garz´ on, J. Jim´ enez-Vicente, Near infrared observations of the truncation of stellar disks, As- tron. Astrophys. 378 (2001) 82–96. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20011190. arXiv:astro-ph/0109295

  36. [44]

    Florido, E

    E. Florido, E. Battaner, A. Guijarro, F. Garz´ on, A. Castillo-Morales, Truncated stellar disks in the near infrared. I. Observations, Astron. Astrophys. 455 (2006) 467–473. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053310. arXiv:astro-ph/0609384

  37. [46]

    Bianchi, The dust distribution in edge-on galaxies

    S. Bianchi, The dust distribution in edge-on galaxies. Radiative transfer fits of V and K’-band images, Astron. Astrophys. 471 (2007) 765–773. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077649. arXiv:0705.1471

  38. [47]

    De Geyter, M

    G. De Geyter, M. Baes, P. Camps, J. Fritz, I. De Looze, T. M. Hughes, S. Viaene, G. Gentile, The distribution of interstellar dust in CALIF A edge-on galaxies via oligochromatic radiative transfer fitting, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 441 (2014) 869–885. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu612...

  39. [48]

    S. S. Savchenko, D. M. Poliakov, A. V. Mosenkov, A. A. Smirnov, A. A. Marchuk, V. B. Il’in, G. A. Gontcharov, J. Seguine, M. Baes, The 180 problem of dust attenuation in photometric decomposition of edge-on galaxies and possible solutions, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 524 (2023) ...

  40. [49]

    K. A. Herrmann, R. Ciardullo, Planetary Nebulae in Face-On Spiral Galaxies. III. Planetary Nebula Kinematics and Disk Mass, Astro- phys. J. 705 (2009) 1686–1703. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1686. arXiv:0910.0266

  41. [50]

    Momany, S

    Y. Momany, S. Zaggia, G. Gilmore, G. Piotto, G. Carraro, L. R. Bedin, F. de Angeli, Outer structure of the Galactic warp and flare: explaining the Canis Major over-density, Astron. Astrophys. 451 (2006) 515–538. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054081. arXiv:astro-ph/0603385

  42. [51]

    Ferguson, S

    D. Ferguson, S. Gardner, B. Yanny, Milky Way Tomography with K and M Dwarf Stars: The Vertical Structure of the Galactic Disk, Astrophys. J. 843 (2017) 141. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa77fd. arXiv:1706.01900

  43. [52]

    H.-F. Wang, C. Liu, Y. Xu, J.-C. Wan, L. Deng, Mapping the Milky Way with LAMOST- III. Complicated spatial structure in the outer disc, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 478 (2018) 3367–3379. doi: 10.1093/ mnras/sty1058. arXiv:1804.10485

  44. [53]

    Bovy, Stellar inventory of the solar neighbourhood using Gaia DR1, Mon

    J. Bovy, Stellar inventory of the solar neighbourhood using Gaia DR1, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 470 (2017) 1360–1387. doi: 10.1093/mnras/ stx1277. arXiv:1704.05063

  45. [54]

    P. S. Dobbie, S. J. Warren, A Bayesian Approach to the Vertical Struc- ture of the Disk of the Milky Way, The Open Journal of Astrophysics 3 (2020) 5. doi: 10.21105/astro.2003.05757. arXiv:2003.05757

  46. [55]

    Jim´ enez-Arranz, D

    ´O. Jim´ enez-Arranz, D. Horta, R. P. van der Marel, D. Nidever, C. F. P. Laporte, E. Patel, H. W. Rix, Vertical structure and kinematics of the LMC disc from SDSS/Gaia, arXiv e-prints (2025) arXiv:2501.04616. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2501.04616. arXiv:2501.04616

  47. [56]

    J. R. Lewis, K. C. Freeman, Kinematics and Chemical Properties of the Old Disk in the Galaxy, The Astronomical Journal 97 (1989) 139. doi:10.1086/114963. 181

  48. [57]

    Bottema, The stellar kinematics of galactic disks., Astron

    R. Bottema, The stellar kinematics of galactic disks., Astron. Astro- phys. 275 (1993) 16–36

  49. [58]

    M. A. Bershady, M. A. W. Verheijen, R. A. Swaters, D. R. Andersen, K. B. Westfall, T. Martinsson, The DiskMass Survey. I. Overview, As- trophys. J. 716 (2010) 198–233. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/716/1/198. arXiv:1004.4816

  50. [59]

    S. F. S´ anchez, R. C. Kennicutt, A. Gil de Paz, G. van de Ven, J. M. V ´ ılchez, L. Wisotzki, C. J. Walcher, D. Mast, J. A. L. Aguerri, S. Albiol-P´ erez, A. Alonso-Herrero, J. Alves, J. Bakos, T. Bart´ akov´ a, J. Bland-Hawthorn, A. Boselli, D. J. Bomans, A. Castillo-Morales...

  51. [60]

    Falc´ on-Barroso, M

    J. Falc´ on-Barroso, M. Lyubenova, G. van de Ven, J. Mendez-Abreu, J. A. L. Aguerri, B. Garc ´ ıa-Lorenzo, S. Bekerait´ e, S. F. S´ anchez, B. Husemann, R. Garc ´ ıa-Benito, D. Mast, C. J. Walcher, S. Zibetti, J. K. Barrera-Ballesteros, L. Galbany, P. S´ anchez-Bl´ azquez, R. ...

  52. [61]

    K. B. Westfall, M. Cappellari, M. A. Bershady, K. Bundy, F. Belfiore, X. Ji, D. R. Law, A. Schaefer, S. Shetty, C. A. Tremonti, R. Yan, B. H. Andrews, J. R. Brownstein, B. Cherinka, L. Coccato, N. Drory, C. Maraston, T. Parikh, J. R. S´ anchez-Gallego, D. Thomas, A.- M. Weijma...

  53. [62]

    Bundy, M

    K. Bundy, M. A. Bershady, D. R. Law, R. Yan, N. Drory, N. MacDon- ald, D. A. Wake, B. Cherinka, J. R. S´ anchez-Gallego, A.-M. Weijmans, D. Thomas, C. Tremonti, K. Masters, L. Coccato, A. M. Diamond- Stanic, A. Arag´ on-Salamanca, V. Avila-Reese, C. Badenes, J. Falc´ on- Barro...

  54. [63]

    S. M. Croom, M. S. Owers, N. Scott, H. Poetrodjojo, B. Groves, J. van de Sande, T. M. Barone, L. Cortese, F. D’Eugenio, J. Bland-Hawthorn, J. Bryant, S. Oh, S. Brough, J. Agostino, S. Casura, B. Catinella, M. Colless, G. Cecil, R. L. Davies, M. J. Drinkwater, S. P. Driver, I. ...

  55. [64]

    M. A. Bershady, K. B. Westfall, S. Shetty, D. R. Law, M. Cappellari, N. Drory, K. Bundy, R. Yan, Asymmetric drift in MaNGA: mass and radially dependent stratification rates in galaxy discs, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 531 (2024) 1592–1612. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1207. arXiv:2405.02460

  56. [65]

    J. T. Mackereth, J. Bovy, H. W. Leung, R. P. Schiavon, W. H. Trick, W. J. Chaplin, K. Cunha, D. K. Feuillet, S. R. Majewski, M. Martig, A. Miglio, D. Nidever, M. H. Pinsonneault, V. S. Aguirre, J. Sobeck, J. Tayar, G. Zasowski, Dynamical heating across the Milky Way disc using...

  57. [66]

    S. R. Kulkarni, C. Heiles, Neutral hydrogen and the diffuse interstellar medium., in: K. I. Kellermann, G. L. Verschuur (Eds.), Galactic and Extragalactic Radio Astronomy, 1988, pp. 95–153

  58. [67]

    J. M. Dickey, F. J. Lockman, H I in the galaxy., Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 28 (1990) 215–261. doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.28.090190. 001243

  59. [68]

    P. M. W. Kalberla, J. Kerp, The Hi Distribution of the Milky Way, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 47 (2009) 27–61. doi: 10.1146/ annurev-astro-082708-101823

  60. [69]

    N. M. McClure-Griffiths, S. Stanimirovi´ c, D. R. Rybarczyk, Atomic Hydrogen in the Milky Way: A Stepping Stone in the Evolution of Galaxies, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 61 (2023) 19–63. doi: 10. 1146/annurev-astro-052920-104851 . arXiv:2307.08464

  61. [70]

    N. Z. Scoville, D. B. Sanders, H 2 in the Galaxy, in: D. J. Hollenbach, J. Thronson, Harley A. (Eds.), Interstellar Processes, volume 134, 1987, p. 21. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-3861-8_2

  62. [71]

    Heyer, T

    M. Heyer, T. M. Dame, Molecular Clouds in the Milky Way, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 53 (2015) 583–629. doi: 10.1146/ annurev-astro-082214-122324 . 184

  63. [72]

    J. S. Young, N. Z. Scoville, Molecular gas in galaxies., Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 29 (1991) 581–625. doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.29. 090191.003053

  64. [73]

    Omont, Molecules in galaxies, Reports on Progress in Physics 70 (2007) 1099–1176

    A. Omont, Molecules in galaxies, Reports on Progress in Physics 70 (2007) 1099–1176. doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/70/7/R03. arXiv:0709.3814

  65. [74]

    C. F. McKee, J. P. Ostriker, A theory of the interstellar medium: three components regulated by supernova explosions in an inhomogeneous substrate., Astrophys. J. 218 (1977) 148–169. doi: 10.1086/155667

  66. [75]

    S. R. Kulkarni, C. Heiles, The Atomic Component, in: D. J. Hollen- bach, H. A. Thronson, Jr. (Eds.), Interstellar Processes, volume 134, 1987, p. 87. doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-3861-8_5

  67. [76]

    J. M. Dickey, S. Strasser, B. M. Gaensler, M. Haverkorn, D. Kavars, N. M. McClure-Griffiths, J. Stil, A. R. Taylor, The Outer Disk of the Milky Way Seen in λ21 cm Absorption, Astrophys. J. 693 (2009) 1250–1260. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1250. arXiv:0901.0968

  68. [77]

    F. J. Lockman, C. S. Gehman, Vertical Distribution and Support of Galactic H i, Astrophys. J. 382 (1991) 182. doi: 10.1086/170706

  69. [78]

    C. A. Narayan, K. Saha, C. J. Jog, Constraints on the halo density profile using HI flaring in the outer Galaxy, Astron. Astrophys. 440 (2005) 523–530. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041055. arXiv:astro-ph/0508358

  70. [79]

    Lelli, S

    F. Lelli, S. S. McGaugh, J. M. Schombert, SPARC: Mass Models for 175 Disk Galaxies with Spitzer Photometry and Accurate Rotation Curves, The Astronomical Journal 152 (2016) 157. doi: 10.3847/0004-6256/ 152/6/157. arXiv:1606.09251

  71. [80]

    Biswas, V

    P. Biswas, V. Kalinova, N. Roy, N. N. Patra, N. Tyulneva, The GMRT archive atomic gas survey - II. Mass modelling and dark matter halo properties across late-type spirals, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 524 (2023) 6213–6228. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2285. arXiv:2307.13738. 185

  72. [81]

    J. N. Bahcall, R. M. Soneira, The universe at faint magnitudes. I. Mod- els for the Galaxy and the predicted star counts., The Astrophysical Journal Supplement 44 (1980) 73–110. doi: 10.1086/190685

  73. [82]

    D. Mera, G. Chabrier, R. Schaeffer, Towards a consistent model of the Galaxy. II. Derivation of the model, Astron. Astro- phys. 330 (1998) 953–962. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801050. arXiv:astro-ph/9801050

  74. [83]

    Sylos Labini, ˇZ

    F. Sylos Labini, ˇZ. Chrob´ akov´ a, R. Capuzzo-Dolcetta, M. L´ opez- Corredoira, Mass Models of the Milky Way and Estimation of Its Mass from the Gaia DR3 Data Set, Astrophys. J. 945 (2023) 3. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb92c. arXiv:2302.01379

  75. [84]

    V. C. Rubin, W. K. Ford, Jr., N. Thonnard, Rotational properties of 21 SC galaxies with a large range of luminosities and radii, from NGC 4605 (R=4kpc) to UGC 2885 (R=122kpc)., Astrophys. J. 238 (1980) 471–487. doi:10.1086/158003

  76. [85]

    V. C. Rubin, The Rotation of Spiral Galaxies, Science 220 (1983) 1339–1344. doi:10.1126/science.220.4604.1339

  77. [86]

    Mihalas, P

    D. Mihalas, P. M. Routly, Galactic astronomy, 1968

  78. [87]

    Rohlfs, Lectures on density wave theory, volume 69, 1977

    K. Rohlfs, Lectures on density wave theory, volume 69, 1977. doi: 10. 1007/3-540-08448-7

  79. [88]

    J. H. Oort, The force exerted by the stellar system in the direction perpendicular to the galactic plane and some related problems, B.A.N. 6 (1932) 249

  80. [89]

    J. N. Bahcall, The distribution of stars perpendicular to galactic disk, Astrophys. J. 276 (1984) 156–168. doi: 10.1086/161600

  81. [90]

    Sarkar, C

    S. Sarkar, C. J. Jog, Gravitational potential energy of a multi- component galactic disk, Astron. Astrophys. 665 (2022) A23. doi: 10. 1051/0004-6361/202243184. arXiv:2207.09393

  82. [91]

    Sarkar, C

    S. Sarkar, C. J. Jog, Flaring stellar disk in the low surface brightness galaxy UGC 7321, Astron. Astrophys. 628 (2019) A58. doi: 10.1051/ 0004-6361/201935430. arXiv:1905.02735. 186

  83. [92]

    Trimble, Existence and nature of dark matter in the universe., Annu

    V. Trimble, Existence and nature of dark matter in the universe., Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 25 (1987) 425–472. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa. 25.090187.002233

  84. [93]

    J. N. Bahcall, Self-consistent determinations of the total amount of matter near the sun., Astrophys. J. 276 (1984) 169–181. doi: 10.1086/ 161601

  85. [94]

    Flynn, B

    C. Flynn, B. Fuchs, Density of dark matter in the Galactic disk, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 270 (1994) 471–479. doi: 10.1093/mnras/270.3. 471

  86. [96]

    Bienaym´ e, B

    O. Bienaym´ e, B. Famaey, A. Siebert, K. C. Freeman, B. K. Gibson, G. Gilmore, E. K. Grebel, J. Bland-Hawthorn, G. Kordopatis, U. Mu- nari, J. F. Navarro, Q. Parker, W. Reid, G. M. Seabroke, A. Siviero, M. Steinmetz, F. Watson, R. F. G. Wyse, T. Zwitter, Weighing the local dar...

  87. [97]

    C. F. McKee, A. Parravano, D. J. Hollenbach, Stars, Gas, and Dark Matter in the Solar Neighborhood, Astrophys. J. 814 (2015) 13. doi:10. 1088/0004-637X/814/1/13. arXiv:1509.05334

  88. [98]

    Moni Bidin, G

    C. Moni Bidin, G. Carraro, R. A. M´ endez, R. Smith, Kinematical and Chemical Vertical Structure of the Galactic Thick Disk. II. A Lack of Dark Matter in the Solar Neighborhood, Astrophys. J. 751 (2012) 30. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/751/1/30. arXiv:1204.3924

  89. [99]

    J. Bovy, S. Tremaine, On the Local Dark Matter Density, Astrophys. J. 756 (2012) 89. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/756/1/89. arXiv:1205.4033

  90. [100]

    J. H. J. Hagen, A. Helmi, The vertical force in the solar neighbourhood using red clump stars in TGAS and RA VE. Constraints on the local dark matter density, Astron. Astrophys. 615 (2018) A99. doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/201832903. arXiv:1802.09291. 187

  91. [101]

    J. Buch, J. S. C. Leung, J. Fan, Using Gaia DR2 to constrain local dark matter density and thin dark disk, Journal of Cosmology and Astrophysics 2019 (2019) 026. doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2019/04/026. arXiv:1808.05603

  92. [102]

    R. Guo, C. Liu, S. Mao, X.-X. Xue, R. J. Long, L. Zhang, Measuring the local dark matter density with LAMOST DR5 and Gaia DR2, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 495 (2020) 4828–4844. doi: 10.1093/mnras/ staa1483. arXiv:2005.12018

  93. [103]

    M. S. Nitschai, A.-C. Eilers, N. Neumayer, M. Cappellari, H.-W. Rix, Dynamical Model of the Milky Way Using APOGEE and Gaia Data, Astrophys. J. 916 (2021) 112. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac04b5. arXiv:2106.05286

  94. [104]

    J. I. Read, The local dark matter density, Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics 41 (2014) 063101. doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/41/6/ 063101. arXiv:1404.1938

  95. [105]

    P. F. de Salas, A. Widmark, Dark matter local density de- termination: recent observations and future prospects, Reports on Progress in Physics 84 (2021) 104901. doi: 10.1088/1361-6633/ ac24e7. arXiv:2012.11477

  96. [106]

    L. E. Strigari, Galactic searches for dark matter, Physics Reports 531 (2013) 1–88. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2013.05.004. arXiv:1211.7090

  97. [107]

    Binney, M

    J. Binney, M. Merrifield, Galactic Astronomy, 1998

  98. [108]

    F. J. Lockman, The HI halo in the inner galaxy., Astrophys. J. 283 (1984) 90–97. doi: 10.1086/162277

  99. [109]

    J. H. Oort, Radio Data on the Distribution and Motion of Interstellar Gas, in: L. Woltjer (Ed.), The Distribution and Motion of Interstellar Matter in Galaxies, 1962, p. 3

  100. [110]

    P. M. W. Kalberla, L. Dedes, Global properties of the H I distribu- tion in the outer Milky Way. Planar and extra-planar gas, Astron. Astrophys. 487 (2008) 951–963. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20079240. arXiv:0804.4831. 188

  101. [111]

    E. S. Levine, L. Blitz, C. Heiles, The Vertical Structure of the Outer Milky Way H I Disk, Astrophys. J. 643 (2006) 881–896. doi: 10.1086/ 503091. arXiv:astro-ph/0601697

  102. [112]

    C. J. Jog, C. A. Narayan, Vertical distribution of Galactic disc stars and gas constrained by a molecular cloud complex, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 327 (2001) 1021–1028. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04780.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0110331

  103. [113]

    D. B. Sanders, D. P. Clemens, N. Z. Scoville, P. M. Solomon, Molecular Cloud Clusters and Chains, in: H. van Woerden, R. J. Allen, W. B. Burton (Eds.), The Milky Way Galaxy, volume 106 ofIAU Symposium, 1985, p. 329

  104. [114]

    A. R. Rivolo, P. M. Solomon, D. B. Sanders, The Massachusetts–Stony Brook Galactic Plane CO Survey: Statistical Clustering Properties of Molecular Cloud Cores, Astrophys. J. Lett. 301 (1986) L19. doi: 10. 1086/184615

  105. [115]

    T. M. Dame, H. Ungerechts, R. S. Cohen, E. J. de Geus, I. A. Grenier, J. May, D. C. Murphy, L. A. Nyman, P. Thaddeus, A Composite CO Survey of the Entire Milky Way, Astrophys. J. 322 (1987) 706. doi:10.1086/165766

  106. [116]

    Schmidt, A model of the distribution of mass in the Galactic Sys- tem, B.A.N

    M. Schmidt, A model of the distribution of mass in the Galactic Sys- tem, B.A.N. 13 (1956) 15

  107. [117]

    W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, Numerical recipes. The art of scientific computing, 1986

  108. [118]

    Nandakumar, N

    M. Nandakumar, N. Roy, C. J. Jog, K. M. Menten, Observa- tional evidence for local vertical constraining of H I by molecular cloud complexes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 528 (2024) 3992–4009. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae212. arXiv:2401.08168

  109. [119]

    Ben Bekhti, L

    HI4PI Collaboration, N. Ben Bekhti, L. Fl¨ oer, R. Keller, J. Kerp, D. Lenz, B. Winkel, J. Bailin, M. R. Calabretta, L. Dedes, H. A. Ford, B. K. Gibson, U. Haud, S. Janowiecki, P. M. W. Kalberla, F. J. Lockman, N. M. McClure-Griffiths, T. Murphy, H. Nakan- ishi, D. J. Pisano, ...

  110. [120]

    R. P. Olling, On the Usage of Flaring Gas Layers to Determine the Shape of Dark Matter Halos, The Astronomical Journal 110 (1995)

  111. [121]

    C. J. Jog, P. M. Solomon, Two-fluid gravitational instabilities in a galactic disk, Astrophys. J. 276 (1984) 114–126. doi: 10.1086/161597

  112. [122]

    Sharma, M

    S. Sharma, M. R. Hayden, J. Bland-Hawthorn, D. Stello, S. Buder, J. C. Zinn, T. Kallinger, M. Asplund, G. M. De Silva, V. D’Orazi, K. Freeman, J. Kos, G. F. Lewis, J. Lin, K. Lind, S. Martell, J. D. Simpson, R. A. Wittenmyer, D. B. Zucker, T. Zwitter, B. Chen, K. Co- tar, J. E...

  113. [123]

    B. M. Lewis, Face-on galaxies., Astrophys. J. 285 (1984) 453–457. doi:10.1086/162474

  114. [124]

    Kamphuis, The Structure and Kinematics of Halos in Disk Galaxies, Ph.D

    P. Kamphuis, The Structure and Kinematics of Halos in Disk Galaxies, Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen, Netherlands, 2008

  115. [125]

    J. M. Dickey, The Z Velocity Dispersion of Outer HI Disks, in: L. Blitz, P. J. Teuben (Eds.), Unsolved Problems of the Milky Way, volume 169 of IAU Symposium, 1996, p. 489

  116. [126]

    S. M. Kent, T. M. Dame, G. Fazio, Galactic Structure from the Space- lab Infrared Telescope. II. Luminosity Models of the Milky Way, As- trophys. J. 378 (1991) 131. doi: 10.1086/170413

  117. [127]

    Minchev, M

    I. Minchev, M. Martig, D. Streich, C. Scannapieco, R. S. de Jong, M. Steinmetz, On the Formation of Galactic Thick Disks, As- trophys. J. Lett. 804 (2015) L9. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/804/1/L9. arXiv:1502.06606. 190

  118. [128]

    P. M. W. Kalberla, J. Kerp, L. Dedes, U. Haud, Does the Stellar Distribution Flare? A Comparison of Stellar Scale Heights with LAB H I Data, Astrophys. J. 794 (2014) 90. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/ 1/90. arXiv:1408.5334

  119. [129]

    Sotillo-Ramos, M

    D. Sotillo-Ramos, M. Donnari, A. Pillepich, N. Frankel, D. Nelson, V. Springel, L. Hernquist, Disc flaring with TNG50: diversity across Milky Way and M31 analogues, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 523 (2023) 3915–3938. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1485. arXiv:2303.16228

  120. [130]

    O. V. Abramova, A. V. Zasov, The gas density and “volume” Schmidt law for spiral galaxies, Astronomy Reports 52 (2008) 257–269. doi: 10. 1134/S106377290804001X

  121. [131]

    N. N. Patra, Molecular scale height in spiral galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484 (2019) 81–92. doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3493. arXiv:2004.13053

  122. [132]

    R. A. Swaters, R. Sancisi, J. M. van der Hulst, The H I Halo of NGC 891, Astrophys. J. 491 (1997) 140–145. doi: 10.1086/304958. arXiv:astro-ph/9707150

  123. [133]

    Fraternali, G

    F. Fraternali, G. van Moorsel, R. Sancisi, T. Oosterloo, Deep H I Survey of the Spiral Galaxy NGC 2403, The Astronomical Journal 123 (2002) 3124–3140. doi: 10.1086/340358. arXiv:astro-ph/0203405

  124. [134]

    L. D. Matthews, K. Wood, High-Latitude H I in the Low Surface Brightness Galaxy UGC 7321, Astrophys. J. 593 (2003) 721–732. doi:10.1086/376602. arXiv:astro-ph/0305402

  125. [135]

    Fraternali, T

    F. Fraternali, T. A. Oosterloo, R. Sancisi, R. Swaters, The Extra-planar Neutral Gas in the Edge-on Spiral Galaxy NGC 891, in: R. Braun (Ed.), Extra-Planar Gas, volume 331 ofAstronomical Society of the Pa- cific Conference Series, 2005, p. 239. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/ 04...

  126. [136]

    Boomsma, T

    R. Boomsma, T. A. Oosterloo, F. Fraternali, J. M. van der Hulst, R. Sancisi, HI holes and high-velocity clouds in the spiral galaxy NGC 6946, Astron. Astrophys. 490 (2008) 555–570. doi: 10.1051/ 0004-6361:200810120. arXiv:0807.3339. 191

  127. [137]

    Kamphuis, R

    P. Kamphuis, R. F. Peletier, P. C. van der Kruit, T. A. Oosterloo, R. Sancisi, A Study of Extra-Planar HI Gas, in: R. S. DE JONG (Ed.), Island Universes, volume 3 of Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, 2007, p. 303. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5573-7_51

  128. [138]

    de Zeeuw, D

    T. de Zeeuw, D. Pfenniger, Potential-density pairs for galaxies., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 235 (1988) 949–995. doi: 10.1093/mnras/235.3. 949

  129. [139]

    J. F. Navarro, C. S. Frenk, S. D. M. White, The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos, Astrophys. J. 462 (1996) 563. doi:10.1086/177173. arXiv:astro-ph/9508025

  130. [140]

    Banerjee, C

    A. Banerjee, C. J. Jog, Progressively More Prolate Dark Matter Halo in the Outer Galaxy as Traced by Flaring H I Gas, Astrophys. J. Lett. 732 (2011) L8. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/732/1/L8. arXiv:1103.5821

  131. [142]

    M. L. Mateo, Dwarf Galaxies of the Local Group, Annu. Rev. As- tron. Astrophys. 36 (1998) 435–506. doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.36. 1.435. arXiv:astro-ph/9810070

  132. [143]

    Brinks, F

    E. Brinks, F. Walter, J. Ott, Bloated Dwarfs: The Thickness of the HI Disks in Irregular Galaxies, in: E. Athanassoula, A. Bosma, R. Mujica (Eds.), Disks of Galaxies: Kinematics, Dynamics and Peturbations, volume 275 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series , 2...

  133. [144]

    Sancisi, R

    R. Sancisi, R. J. Allen, Neutral hydrogen observations of the edge-on disk galaxy NGC 891., Astron. Astrophys. 74 (1979) 73–84

  134. [145]

    R. H. Warmels, The HI properties of spiral galaxies in the Virgo clus- ter. III. The HI surface density distribution in 36 galaxies., Astron. Astrophys. Supplement 72 (1988) 427–447

  135. [146]

    Kormendy, K

    J. Kormendy, K. C. Freeman, Scaling Laws for Dark Matter Halos in Late-Type and Dwarf Spheroidal Galaxies, in: S. Ryder, D. Pisano, 192 M. Walker, K. Freeman (Eds.), Dark Matter in Galaxies, volume 220 of IAU Symposium, 2004, p. 377. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/ 0407321. arXi...

  136. [147]

    Banerjee, C

    A. Banerjee, C. J. Jog, Why are some galaxy discs extremely thin?, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 431 (2013) 582–588. doi: 10.1093/mnras/ stt186. arXiv:1210.8244

  137. [148]

    Superthin

    L. D. Matthews, The Extraordinary “Superthin” Spiral Galaxy UGC

  138. [149]

    Superthin

    L. D. Matthews, J. S. Gallagher, III, W. van Driel, The Extraor- dinary “Superthin” Spiral Galaxy UGC 7321. I. Disk Color Gradi- ents and Global Properties from Multiwavelength Observations, The Astronomical Journal 118 (1999) 2751–2766. doi: 10.1086/301128. arXiv:astro-ph/9909142

  139. [150]

    J. M. Uson, L. D. Matthews, H I Imaging Observations of Superthin Galaxies. I. UGC 7321, The Astronomical Journal 125 (2003) 2455–

  140. [151]

    Kurapati, A

    S. Kurapati, A. Banerjee, J. N. Chengalur, D. Makarov, S. Borisov, A. Afanasiev, A. Antipova, Mass modelling of a superthin galaxy, FGC 1540, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 479 (2018) 5686–5695. doi: 10. 1093/mnras/sty1856. arXiv:1807.02992

  141. [152]

    F. J. S´ anchez-Salcedo, C. Flynn, J. A. de Diego, Jeans Analy- sis of the Galactic Thick Disk and the Local Dark Matter Den- sity, Astrophys. J. 817 (2016) 13. doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/13. arXiv:1511.08199

  142. [153]

    C. Wegg, O. Gerhard, M. Bieth, The gravitational force field of the Galaxy measured from the kinematics of RR Lyrae in Gaia, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 485 (2019) 3296–3316. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz572. arXiv:1806.09635

  143. [154]

    C. L. Perry, The galactic force law K(z)., The Astronomical Journal 74 (1969) 139–165. doi: 10.1086/110787. 193

  144. [155]

    Y. Jing, C. Du, J. Gu, Y. Jia, X. Peng, Y. Chen, Z. Wu, J. Ma, X. Zhou, Z. Cao, Y. Hou, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, Kinematics of the Galactic disc from a LAMOST dwarf sample, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 463 (2016) 3390–3397. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2230. arXiv:1609.00455

  145. [156]

    Q. Xia, C. Liu, S. Mao, Y. Song, L. Zhang, R. J. Long, Y. Zhang, Y. Hou, Y. Wang, Y. Wu, Determining the local dark matter density with LAMOST data, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 458 (2016) 3839–3850. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw565. arXiv:1510.06810

  146. [157]

    W. X. Sun, Y. Huang, H. F. Wang, C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Y. Li, B. Q. Chen, H. W. Zhang, D. D. Wei, D. K. Jiang, X. W. Liu, Mapping the Galactic Disk with the LAMOST and Gaia Red Clump Sample. V. On the Origin of the “Young” [ α/Fe]-enhanced Stars, Astrophys. J. 903 (2020) 12. d...

  147. [159]

    Yoachim, J

    P. Yoachim, J. J. Dalcanton, Structural Parameters of Thin and Thick Disks in Edge-on Disk Galaxies, The Astronomical Journal 131 (2006) 226–249. doi:10.1086/497970. arXiv:astro-ph/0508460

  148. [160]

    Comer´ on, B

    S. Comer´ on, B. G. Elmegreen, J. H. Knapen, H. Salo, E. Lau- rikainen, J. Laine, E. Athanassoula, A. Bosma, K. Sheth, M. W. Re- gan, J. L. Hinz, A. Gil de Paz, K. Men´ endez-Delmestre, T. Mizu- sawa, J.-C. Mu˜ noz-Mateos, M. Seibert, T. Kim, D. M. Elmegreen, D. A. Gadotti, L....

  149. [161]

    N. N. Patra, H I scale height in spiral galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499 (2020) 2063–2075. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2959

  150. [162]

    X. Li, Y. Shi, Z.-Y. Zhang, J. Chen, X. Yu, J. Wang, Q. Gu, S. Li, The H I gas disc thickness of the ultra-diffuse galaxy AGC 242019, 194 Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 516 (2022) 4220–4227. doi: 10.1093/mnras/ stac2340. arXiv:2208.12495

  151. [164]

    Schmidt, The Rate of Star Formation., Astrophys

    M. Schmidt, The Rate of Star Formation., Astrophys. J. 129 (1959)

  152. [165]

    E. C. Ostriker, C.-G. Kim, Pressure-regulated, Feedback-modulated Star Formation in Disk Galaxies, Astrophys. J. 936 (2022) 137. doi:10. 3847/1538-4357/ac7de2. arXiv:2206.00681

  153. [166]

    Khrapov, A

    S. Khrapov, A. Khoperskov, V. Korchagin, Modeling of Spiral Struc- ture in a Multi-Component Milky Way-Like Galaxy, Galaxies 9 (2021)

  154. [167]

    Bacchini, F

    C. Bacchini, F. Fraternali, G. Iorio, G. Pezzulli, Volumetric star for- mation laws of disc galaxies, Astron. Astrophys. 622 (2019) A64. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834382. arXiv:1810.03616

  155. [168]

    Forbes, M

    J. Forbes, M. Krumholz, A. Burkert, Evolving Gravitationally Un- stable Disks over Cosmic Time: Implications for Thick Disk Forma- tion, Astrophys. J. 754 (2012) 48. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/754/1/48. arXiv:1112.1410

  156. [169]

    Aniyan, K

    S. Aniyan, K. C. Freeman, M. Arnaboldi, O. E. Gerhard, L. Coc- cato, M. Fabricius, K. Kuijken, M. Merrifield, A. A. Ponomareva, Re- solving the disc-halo degeneracy - I: a look at NGC 628, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 476 (2018) 1909–1930. doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty310. arXiv:1802.00465

  157. [170]

    Tsukui, E

    T. Tsukui, E. Wisnioski, J. Bland-Hawthorn, K. Freeman, The emer- gence of galactic thin and thick discs across cosmic history, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2409.15909. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.15909. arXiv:2409.15909

  158. [171]

    Binney, S

    J. Binney, S. Tremaine, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition, 2008. 195

  159. [172]

    arXiv:2105.03198

    doi:10.3390/galaxies9020029. arXiv:2105.03198

  160. [173]

    G. L. Camm, The virial theorem for statistical distributions of stars, in: Les Nouvelles M´ ethodes de la Dynamique Stellaire, 1967, p. 141

  161. [174]

    Tamburro, H

    D. Tamburro, H. W. Rix, A. K. Leroy, M. M. Mac Low, F. Walter, R. C. Kennicutt, E. Brinks, W. J. G. de Blok, What is Driving the H I Velocity Dispersion?, The Astronomical Journal 137 (2009) 4424–4435. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/137/5/4424. arXiv:0903.0183

  162. [175]

    W. Sun, Y. Huang, H. Shen, C. Wang, H. Zhang, Z. Tian, X. Liu, B. Jiang, Mapping the Galactic Disk with the LAMOST and Gaia Red Clump Sample. VIII. Mapping the Kinematics of the Galactic Disk Us- ing Mono-age and Mono-abundance Stellar Populations, Astrophys. J. 961 (2024) 141...

  163. [176]

    Uppal, S

    N. Uppal, S. Ganesh, M. Schultheis, Warp and flare of the old Galactic disc as traced by the red clump stars, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 527 (2024) 4863–4873. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3525. arXiv:2311.09616

  164. [177]

    Yu, H.-F

    Y. Yu, H.-F. Wang, W.-Y. Cui, L.-L. Li, C. Liu, B. Zhang, H. Tian, Z.-Y. Huo, J. Ju, Z.-C. Liu, F. Wen, S. Feng, The Flare and Warp of the Young Stellar Disk Traced with LAMOST DR5 OB-type Stars, Astrophys. J. 922 (2021) 80. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1e91. arXiv:2102.00731

  165. [178]

    Chandrasekhar, Ellipsoidal figures of equilibrium, 1969

    S. Chandrasekhar, Ellipsoidal figures of equilibrium, 1969

  166. [179]

    Ciucˇ a, D

    I. Ciucˇ a, D. Kawata, J. Lin, L. Casagrande, G. Seabroke, M. Crop- per, The vertical metallicity gradients of mono-age stellar popula- tions in the Milky Way with the RA VE and Gaia data, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 475 (2018) 1203–1212. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3285. arXiv:1706.05005

  167. [180]

    J. Bovy, A. Bahmanyar, T. K. Fritz, N. Kallivayalil, The Shape of the Inner Milky Way Halo from Observations of the Pal 5 and GD–1 Stellar Streams, Astrophys. J. 833 (2016) 31. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/ 1/31. arXiv:1609.01298. 196

  168. [181]

    J. T. Mackereth, J. Bovy, R. P. Schiavon, G. Zasowski, K. Cunha, P. M. Frinchaboy, A. E. Garc ´ ıa Perez, M. R. Hayden, J. Holtzman, S. R. Majewski, S. M´ esz´ aros, D. L. Nidever, M. Pinsonneault, M. D. Shetrone, The age-metallicity structure of the Milky Way disc using APOGE...

  169. [182]

    A. V. Kasparova, I. Y. Katkov, I. V. Chilingarian, O. K. Silchenko, A. V. Moiseev, S. B. Borisov, The diversity of thick galactic discs, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 460 (2016) L89–L93. doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/ slw083. arXiv:1604.07624

  170. [183]

    R. M. Rich, A. Mosenkov, H. Lee-Saunders, A. Koch, J. Kormendy, J. Kennefick, N. Brosch, L. Sales, J. Bullock, A. Burkert, M. Collins, M. Cooper, M. Fusco, D. Reitzel, D. Thilker, D. G. Milewski, L. Elias, M. L. Saade, L. De Groot, The haloes and environments of nearby galaxie...

  171. [184]

    Chrob´ akov´ a, R

    ˇZ. Chrob´ akov´ a, R. Nagy, M. L´ opez-Corredoira, Warp and flare of the Galactic disc revealed with supergiants by Gaia EDR3, As- tron. Astrophys. 664 (2022) A58. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202243296. arXiv:2206.08230

  172. [185]

    Ranaivoharimina, T

    N. Ranaivoharimina, T. Randriamampandry, J. Wang, K. Men´ endez- Delmestre, T. S. Gon¸ calves, On the Stellar Disk Vertical Scale Height of Edge-on Galaxies from S 4G, Astrophys. J. 977 (2024) 66. doi: 10. 3847/1538-4357/ad85d5. arXiv:2410.09762

  173. [186]

    Kawata, R

    D. Kawata, R. J. J. Grand, B. K. Gibson, L. Casagrande, J. A. S. Hunt, C. B. Brook, Impacts of a flaring star-forming disc and stellar radial mixing on the vertical metallicity gradient, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 464 (2017) 702–712. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2363. arXiv:1604.07412

  174. [187]

    Haines, E

    T. Haines, E. D’Onghia, B. Famaey, C. Laporte, L. Hernquist, Im- plications of a Time-varying Galactic Potential for Determinations of the Dynamical Surface Density, Astrophys. J. Lett. 879 (2019) L15. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab25f3. arXiv:1903.00607. 197

  175. [188]

    D’Onghia, Disk-stability Constraints on the Number of Arms in Spiral Galaxies, Astrophys

    E. D’Onghia, Disk-stability Constraints on the Number of Arms in Spiral Galaxies, Astrophys. J. Lett. 808 (2015) L8. doi: 10.1088/ 2041-8205/808/1/L8. arXiv:1507.00724

  176. [189]

    W.-T. Kim, E. C. Ostriker, Gravitational Runaway and Turbulence Driving in Star-Gas Galactic Disks, Astrophys. J. 660 (2007) 1232–

  177. [190]

    Ossa-Fuentes, A

    L. Ossa-Fuentes, A. S. Borlaff, J. E. Beckman, P. M. Marcum, M. N. Fanelli, Flares, Warps, Truncations, and Satellite: The Ultra-thin Galaxy UGC 11859, Astrophys. J. 951 (2023) 149. doi: 10.3847/ 1538-4357/acd54c. arXiv:2307.09521

  178. [191]

    Ghosh, C

    S. Ghosh, C. J. Jog, Effect of finite disk-thickness on swing amplifica- tion of non-axisymmetric perturbations in a sheared galactic disk, As- tron. Astrophys. 617 (2018) A47. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832988. arXiv:1806.01439

  179. [192]

    Ghosh, C

    S. Ghosh, C. J. Jog, Dynamical interplay of disc thickness and interstel- lar gas: Implication for the longevity of spiral density waves, Astron. Astrophys. 658 (2022) A171. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142174. arXiv:2111.10893

  180. [193]

    Natarajan (Ed.), The Shapes of Galaxies and Their Dark Halos, 2002

    P. Natarajan (Ed.), The Shapes of Galaxies and Their Dark Halos, 2002

  181. [194]

    R. H. Wechsler, J. L. Tinker, The Connection Between Galax- ies and Their Dark Matter Halos, Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 56 (2018) 435–487. doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081817-051756 . arXiv:1804.03097

  182. [195]

    arXiv:1901.04502

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1521. arXiv:1901.04502

  183. [196]

    V. C. Rubin, W. K. Ford, Jr., N. Thonnard, Extended rotation curves of high-luminosity spiral galaxies. IV. Systematic dynamical properties, Sa -¿ Sc., Astrophys. J. Lett. 225 (1978) L107–L111. doi: 10.1086/ 182804. 198

  184. [197]

    Behrendt, A

    M. Behrendt, A. Burkert, M. Schartmann, Structure formation in gas- rich galactic discs with finite thickness: from discs to rings, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 448 (2015) 1007–1019. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv027. arXiv:1408.5902

  185. [198]

    Bosma, The distribution and kinematics of neutral hydrogen in spi- ral galaxies of various morphological types, Ph.D

    A. Bosma, The distribution and kinematics of neutral hydrogen in spi- ral galaxies of various morphological types, Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen, Netherlands, 1978

  186. [199]

    T. S. van Albada, J. N. Bahcall, K. Begeman, R. Sancisi, Distribution of dark matter in the spiral galaxy NGC 3198., Astrophys. J. 295 (1985) 305–313. doi: 10.1086/163375

  187. [200]

    S. M. Kent, Dark matter in spiral galaxies. I. Galaxies with opti- cal rotation curves., The Astronomical Journal 91 (1986) 1301–1327. doi:10.1086/114106

  188. [201]

    A. H. Broeils, S. Courteau, Modelling the Mass Distribution in Spiral Galaxies, in: M. Persic, P. Salucci (Eds.), Dark and Visible Matter in Galaxies and Cosmological Implications, volume 117 of Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series , 1997, p. 74. doi: 10.48550...

  189. [202]

    Combes, Properties of dark matter haloes, New Astronomy Review 46 (2002) 755–766

    F. Combes, Properties of dark matter haloes, New Astronomy Review 46 (2002) 755–766. doi: 10.1016/S1387-6473(02)00244-0 . arXiv:astro-ph/0206126

  190. [203]

    P. D. Sackett, L. S. Sparke, The Dark Halo of the Polar-Ring Galaxy NGC 4650A, Astrophys. J. 361 (1990) 408. doi: 10.1086/169206

  191. [204]

    M. S. Roberts, R. N. Whitehurst, The rotation curve and geometry of M31 at large galactocentric distances., Astrophys. J. 201 (1975) 327–346. doi:10.1086/153889

  192. [205]

    C. A. Narayan, C. J. Jog, The puzzle about the radial cut-off in galactic disks, Astron. Astrophys. 407 (2003) L59–L62. doi: 10.1051/ 0004-6361:20031052. arXiv:astro-ph/0307389

  193. [206]

    R. P. Olling, The Highly Flattened Dark Matter Halo of NGC 4244, The Astronomical Journal 112 (1996) 481. doi: 10.1086/118029. arXiv:astro-ph/9605111. 199

  194. [207]

    J. F. Becquaert, F. Combes, The 3D geometry of Dark Matter Halos., Astron. Astrophys. 325 (1997) 41–56. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/ 9704088. arXiv:astro-ph/9704088

  195. [208]

    W. J. G. de Blok, S. S. McGaugh, V. C. Rubin, High-Resolution Rotation Curves of Low Surface Brightness Galaxies. II. Mass Models, The Astronomical Journal 122 (2001) 2396–2427. doi:10.1086/323450

  196. [209]

    K. M. Ashman, Dark Matter in Galaxies, Publications of the Astro- nomical Society of the Pacific 104 (1992) 1109. doi: 10.1086/133099

  197. [210]

    P. Li, F. Lelli, S. McGaugh, J. Schombert, A Comprehensive Catalog of Dark Matter Halo Models for SPARC Galaxies, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement 247 (2020) 31. doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab700e. arXiv:2001.10538

  198. [211]

    Giovanelli, M

    R. Giovanelli, M. P. Haynes, Extragalactic neutral hydrogen., in: K. I. Kellermann, G. L. Verschuur (Eds.), Galactic and Extragalactic Radio Astronomy, 1988, pp. 522–562

  199. [212]

    Burkert, The Structure of Dark Matter Halos in Dwarf Galax- ies, Astrophys

    A. Burkert, The Structure of Dark Matter Halos in Dwarf Galax- ies, Astrophys. J. Lett. 447 (1995) L25–L28. doi: 10.1086/309560. arXiv:astro-ph/9504041

  200. [213]

    Bailin, M

    J. Bailin, M. Steinmetz, Internal and External Alignment of the Shapes and Angular Momenta of ΛCDM Halos, Astrophys. J. 627 (2005) 647–

  201. [214]

    P. Bett, V. Eke, C. S. Frenk, A. Jenkins, J. Helly, J. Navarro, The spin and shape of dark matter haloes in the Millennium sim- ulation of a Λ cold dark matter universe, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 376 (2007) 215–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11432.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0608607

  202. [215]

    C. A. Vera-Ciro, L. V. Sales, A. Helmi, C. S. Frenk, J. F. Navarro, V. Springel, M. Vogelsberger, S. D. M. White, The shape of dark matter haloes in the Aquarius simulations: evolution and memory, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 416 (2011) 1377–1391. doi: 10.1111/j. 1365-2966.2011.1...

  203. [216]

    Sofue, Dark halos of M 31 and the Milky Way, Publ

    Y. Sofue, Dark halos of M 31 and the Milky Way, Publ. of the Astron. Soc. of Japan 67 (2015) 75. doi: 10.1093/pasj/psv042. arXiv:1504.05368

  204. [217]

    Bailin, D

    J. Bailin, D. Kawata, B. K. Gibson, M. Steinmetz, J. F. Navarro, C. B. Brook, S. P. D. Gill, R. A. Ibata, A. Knebe, G. F. Lewis, T. Okamoto, Internal Alignment of the Halos of Disk Galaxies in Cosmological Hy- drodynamic Simulations, Astrophys. J. Lett. 627 (2005) L17–L20. doi...

  205. [218]

    Jimenez, L

    R. Jimenez, L. Verde, S. P. Oh, Dark halo properties from rotation curves, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 339 (2003) 243–259. doi: 10.1046/ j.1365-8711.2003.06165.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0201352

  206. [219]

    Prada, J

    J. Prada, J. E. Forero-Romero, R. J. J. Grand, R. Pakmor, V. Springel, Dark matter halo shapes in the Auriga simulations, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 490 (2019) 4877–4888. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2873. arXiv:1910.04045

  207. [220]

    C. G. Palau, J. Miralda-Escud´ e, The oblateness of the Milky Way dark matter halo from the stellar streams of NGC 3201, M68, and Palomar 5, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 524 (2023) 2124–2147. doi: 10.1093/ mnras/stad1930. arXiv:2212.03587

  208. [221]

    Dubinski, D

    J. Dubinski, D. Chakrabarty, Warps and Bars from the External Tidal Torques of Tumbling Dark Halos, Astrophys. J. 703 (2009) 2068–2081. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/2068. arXiv:0908.0168

  209. [222]

    D. R. Law, S. R. Majewski, K. V. Johnston, Evidence for a Triaxial Milky Way Dark Matter Halo from the Sagittarius Stellar Tidal Stream, Astrophys. J. Lett. 703 (2009) L67–L71. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/703/ 1/L67. arXiv:0908.3187

  210. [223]

    H.-W. Rix, D. Zaritsky, Nonaxisymmetric Structures in the Stellar Disks of Galaxies, Astrophys. J. 447 (1995) 82. doi: 10.1086/175858. arXiv:astro-ph/9505111. 201

  211. [224]

    K. T. E. Chua, A. Pillepich, M. Vogelsberger, L. Hernquist, Shape of dark matter haloes in the Illustris simulation: effects of baryons, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 484 (2019) 476–493. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3531. arXiv:1809.07255

  212. [225]

    Zaritsky, H

    D. Zaritsky, H. Salo, E. Laurikainen, D. Elmegreen, E. Athanassoula, A. Bosma, S. Comer´ on, S. Erroz-Ferrer, B. Elmegreen, D. A. Gadotti, A. Gil de Paz, J. L. Hinz, L. C. Ho, B. W. Holwerda, T. Kim, J. H. Knapen, J. Laine, S. Laine, B. F. Madore, S. Meidt, K. Menendez- Delmes...

  213. [227]

    van Eymeren, E

    J. van Eymeren, E. J¨ utte, C. J. Jog, Y. Stein, R. J. Dettmar, Lop- sidedness in WHISP galaxies. II. Morphological lopsidedness, As- tron. Astrophys. 530 (2011) A30. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201016178. arXiv:1103.4929

  214. [228]

    R. H. M. Schoenmakers, M. Franx, P. T. de Zeeuw, Measuring non- axisymmetry in spiral galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 292 (1997) 349–364. doi:10.1093/mnras/292.2.349. arXiv:astro-ph/9707332

  215. [229]

    van Eymeren, E

    J. van Eymeren, E. J¨ utte, C. J. Jog, Y. Stein, R. J. Dettmar, Lop- sidedness in WHISP galaxies. I. Rotation curves and kinematic lopsid- edness, Astron. Astrophys. 530 (2011) A29. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 201016177. arXiv:1103.4928

  216. [230]

    P. M. W. Kalberla, L. Dedes, J. Kerp, U. Haud, Dark matter in the Milky Way. II. The HI gas distribution as a tracer of the gravita- tional potential, Astron. Astrophys. 469 (2007) 511–527. doi: 10.1051/ 0004-6361:20066362. arXiv:0704.3925

  217. [231]

    Rathulnath, C

    R. Rathulnath, C. J. Jog, Dynamics of prolate spheroidal mass dis- tributions with varying eccentricity, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 433 (2013) 719–729. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt759. arXiv:1305.1408. 202

  218. [232]

    Bournaud, F

    F. Bournaud, F. Combes, C. J. Jog, I. Puerari, Lopsided spiral galaxies: evidence for gas accretion, Astron. Astrophys. 438 (2005) 507–520. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052631. arXiv:astro-ph/0503314

  219. [233]

    C. J. Jog, F. Combes, Lopsided spiral galaxies, Physics Reports 471 (2009) 75–111. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2008.12.002. arXiv:0811.1101

  220. [234]

    R. A. Angiras, C. J. Jog, A. Omar, K. S. Dwarakanath, Origin of disc lopsidedness in the Eridanus group of galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 369 (2006) 1849–1857. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10418.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0604120

  221. [235]

    C. J. Jog, Dynamics of Orbits and Local Gas Stability in a Lopsided Galaxy, Astrophys. J. 488 (1997) 642–651. doi: 10.1086/304721

  222. [236]

    C. J. Jog, Dynamics in a Lopsided Spiral Galaxy: Negative Disk Re- sponse to Perturbation Halo Potential, Astrophys. J. 522 (1999) 661–

  223. [237]

    C. J. Jog, Large-scale asymmetry of rotation curves in lopsided spi- ral galaxies, Astron. Astrophys. 391 (2002) 471–479. doi: 10.1051/ 0004-6361:20020832. arXiv:astro-ph/0207055

  224. [238]

    Ghosh, K

    S. Ghosh, K. Saha, C. J. Jog, F. Combes, P. Di Matteo, Genesis of morpho-kinematic lopsidedness in minor merger of galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 511 (2022) 5878–5896. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac461. arXiv:2105.05270

  225. [239]

    L´ opez-Corredoira, J

    M. L´ opez-Corredoira, J. Betancort-Rijo, Azimuthal dependence of the density distribution in outer galactic discs accreting intergalac- tic flows, Astron. Astrophys. 493 (2009) L9–L12. doi: 10.1051/ 0004-6361:200811237. arXiv:0811.3875

  226. [240]

    K. Saha, E. S. Levine, C. J. Jog, L. Blitz, The Milky Way’s Dark Matter Halo Appears to be Lopsided, Astrophys. J. 697 (2009) 2015–

  227. [241]

    Braun, The Distribution and Kinematics of Neutral Gas in M31, Astrophys

    R. Braun, The Distribution and Kinematics of Neutral Gas in M31, Astrophys. J. 372 (1991) 54. doi: 10.1086/169954. 203

  228. [242]

    Banerjee, L

    A. Banerjee, L. D. Matthews, C. J. Jog, Dark matter dominance at all radii in the superthin galaxy UGC 7321, New Astronomy 15 (2010) 89–95. doi:10.1016/j.newast.2009.05.015. arXiv:0906.0217

  229. [243]

    M. D. Weinberg, Production of Milky Way Structure by the Magel- lanic Clouds, Astrophys. J. Lett. 455 (1995) L31. doi:10.1086/309803. arXiv:astro-ph/9507071

  230. [244]

    A. V. Zasov, D. I. Makarov, E. A. Mikhailova, Thickness of Thin Stellar Disks and the Mass of the Dark Halo, Soviet Astronomy Letters 17 (1991) 374

  231. [245]

    J. C. O’Brien, K. C. Freeman, P. C. van der Kruit, The dark matter halo shape of edge-on disk galaxies. IV. UGC 7321, As- tron. Astrophys. 515 (2010) A63. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912568. arXiv:1002.3098

  232. [246]

    M. Das, R. Ianjamasimanana, S. S. McGaugh, J. Schombert, K. S. Dwarakanath, Estimating the Oblateness of Dark Matter Halos Using Neutral Hydrogen Velocity Dispersion, Astrophys. J. Lett. 946 (2023) L8. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acc10e. arXiv:2303.05104

  233. [247]

    E. M. Di Teodoro, F. Fraternali, 3D BAROLO: a new 3D algorithm to derive rotation curves of galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 451 (2015) 3021–3033. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1213. arXiv:1505.07834

  234. [248]

    Lelli, S

    F. Lelli, S. S. McGaugh, J. M. Schombert, M. S. Pawlowski, One Law to Rule Them All: The Radial Acceleration Relation of Galax- ies, Astrophys. J. 836 (2017) 152. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/152. arXiv:1610.08981

  235. [249]

    Banerjee, C

    A. Banerjee, C. J. Jog, The Flattened Dark Matter Halo of M31 as Deduced from the Observed H I Scale Heights, Astrophys. J. 685 (2008) 254–260. doi:10.1086/591223. arXiv:0806.3610

  236. [250]

    Bekki, K

    K. Bekki, K. C. Freeman, Extended H I Spiral Structure and the Figure Rotation of Triaxial Dark Halos, Astrophys. J. Lett. 574 (2002) L21–L24. doi:10.1086/342262. arXiv:astro-ph/0206208. 204

  237. [251]

    Alimi, R

    J.-M. Alimi, R. Koskas, The shape of dark matter halos: A new fun- damental cosmological invariance, Astron. Astrophys. 691 (2024) A10. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450845. arXiv:2406.15947

  238. [252]

    W. J. G. de Blok, S. S. McGaugh, The dark and visible mat- ter content of low surface brightness disc galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 290 (1997) 533–552. doi: 10.1093/mnras/290.3.533. arXiv:astro-ph/9704274

  239. [253]

    C. J. Jog, Effective Q Criterion for Disk Stability in an External Potential, The Astronomical Journal 147 (2014) 132. doi: 10.1088/ 0004-6256/147/6/132

  240. [254]

    Ghosh, C

    S. Ghosh, C. J. Jog, Suppression of gravitational instabilities by dominant dark matter halo in low-surface-brightness galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 439 (2014) 929–935. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu013. arXiv:1401.1271

  241. [255]

    V. P. Debattista, J. A. Sellwood, Warped Galaxies from Misaligned Angular Momenta, Astrophys. J. Lett. 513 (1999) L107–L110. doi: 10. 1086/311913. arXiv:astro-ph/9901153

  242. [256]

    J. J. Han, C. Conroy, L. Hernquist, A tilted dark halo origin of the Galactic disk warp and flare, Nature Astronomy 7 (2023) 1481–1485. doi:10.1038/s41550-023-02076-9 . arXiv:2309.07209

  243. [257]

    Ideta, S

    M. Ideta, S. Hozumi, T. Tsuchiya, M. Takizawa, Time evolu- tion of galactic warps in prolate haloes, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 311 (2000) 733–740. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03092.x. arXiv:astro-ph/9910030

  244. [258]

    B. S. Ryden, Oblate spheroidal mass distributions of varying ellipticity, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 244 (1990) 341–348

  245. [259]

    Kumar, M

    A. Kumar, M. Das, S. K. Kataria, The effect of dark matter halo shape on bar buckling and boxy/peanut bulges, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509 (2022) 1262–1268. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3019. arXiv:2110.08165. 205

  246. [260]

    Ibata, S

    R. Ibata, S. Chapman, A. M. N. Ferguson, G. Lewis, M. Irwin, N. Tanvir, On the Accretion Origin of a Vast Extended Stellar Disk around the Andromeda Galaxy, Astrophys. J. 634 (2005) 287–313. doi:10.1086/491727. arXiv:astro-ph/0504164

  247. [261]

    Verˇ siˇ c, M

    T. Verˇ siˇ c, M. Rejkuba, M. Arnaboldi, O. Gerhard, C. Pulsoni, L. M. Valenzuela, J. Hartke, L. L. Watkins, G. van de Ven, S. Thater, Shapes of dark matter haloes with discrete globular cluster dynamics: The example of NGC 5128 (Centaurus A), Astron. Astrophys. 687 (2024) A80...

  248. [262]

    Vera-Ciro, A

    C. Vera-Ciro, A. Helmi, Constraints on the Shape of the Milky Way Dark Matter Halo from the Sagittarius Stream, Astrophys. J. Lett. 773 (2013) L4. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/773/1/L4. arXiv:1304.4646

  249. [263]

    Ibata, K

    R. Ibata, K. Malhan, W. Tenachi, A. Ardern-Arentsen, M. Bellazz- ini, P. Bianchini, P. Bonifacio, E. Caffau, F. Diakogiannis, R. Errani, B. Famaey, S. Ferrone, N. F. Martin, P. di Matteo, G. Monari, F. Re- naud, E. Starkenburg, G. Thomas, A. Viswanathan, Z. Yuan, Charting the ...

  250. [264]

    Helmi, Velocity Trends in the Debris of Sagittarius and the Shape of the Dark Matter Halo of Our Galaxy, Astrophys

    A. Helmi, Velocity Trends in the Debris of Sagittarius and the Shape of the Dark Matter Halo of Our Galaxy, Astrophys. J. Lett. 610 (2004) L97–L100. doi:10.1086/423340. arXiv:astro-ph/0406396

  251. [265]

    Bonaca, A

    A. Bonaca, A. M. Price-Whelan, Stellar streams in the Gaia era, New Astronomy Review 100 (2025) 101713. doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2024. 101713. arXiv:2405.19410

  252. [266]

    Posti, A

    L. Posti, A. Helmi, Mass and shape of the Milky Way’s dark matter halo with globular clusters from Gaia and Hubble, As- tron. Astrophys. 621 (2019) A56. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833355. arXiv:1805.01408

  253. [267]

    Pranav, C

    P. Pranav, C. J. Jog, Response of a galactic disc to vertical perturba- tions: strong dependence on density distribution, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 406 (2010) 576–585. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16695.x. arXiv:1003.3327

  254. [268]

    S. A. Khoperskov, A. V. Moiseev, A. V. Khoperskov, A. S. Saburova, To be or not to be oblate: the shape of the dark matter halo in polar 206 ring galaxies, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 441 (2014) 2650–2662. doi:10. 1093/mnras/stu692. arXiv:1404.1247

  255. [269]

    Milgrom, A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis., Astrophys

    M. Milgrom, A modification of the Newtonian dynamics as a possible alternative to the hidden mass hypothesis., Astrophys. J. 270 (1983) 365–370. doi:10.1086/161130

  256. [270]

    Helmi, Is the dark halo of our Galaxy spherical?, Mon

    A. Helmi, Is the dark halo of our Galaxy spherical?, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 351 (2004) 643–648. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004. 07812.x. arXiv:astro-ph/0309579

  257. [271]

    Famaey, S

    B. Famaey, S. S. McGaugh, Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND): Observational Phenomenology and Relativistic Extensions, Liv- ing Reviews in Relativity 15 (2012) 10. doi: 10.12942/lrr-2012-10. arXiv:1112.3960

  258. [272]

    Banik, H

    I. Banik, H. Zhao, From Galactic Bars to the Hubble Tension: Weigh- ing Up the Astrophysical Evidence for Milgromian Gravity, Symmetry 14 (2022) 1331. doi: 10.3390/sym14071331. arXiv:2110.06936

  259. [273]

    F. J. S´ anchez-Salcedo, K. Saha, C. A. Narayan, The thickness of HI in galactic discs under MOdified Newtonian Dynamics: theory and application to the Galaxy, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 385 (2008) 1585–

  260. [274]

    Gilmore, N

    G. Gilmore, N. Reid, New light on faint stars - III. Galactic structure towards the South Pole and the Galactic thick disc., Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 202 (1983) 1025–1047. doi: 10.1093/mnras/202.4.1025

  261. [275]

    Vieira, G

    K. Vieira, G. Carraro, V. Korchagin, A. Lutsenko, T. M. Girard, W. van Altena, Milky Way Thin and Thick Disk Kinematics with Gaia EDR3 and RA VE DR5, Astrophys. J. 932 (2022) 28. doi: 10. 3847/1538-4357/ac6b9b. arXiv:2205.00590

  262. [276]

    Combes, M

    F. Combes, M. Arnaboldi, The dark halo of polar-ring galaxy NGC 4650a: flattened towards the polar ring?, Astron. Astrophys. 305 (1996) 763

  263. [277]

    Bovy, H.-W

    J. Bovy, H.-W. Rix, C. Liu, D. W. Hogg, T. C. Beers, Y. S. Lee, The Spatial Structure of Mono-abundance Sub-populations of the Milky Way Disk, Astrophys. J. 753 (2012) 148. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/ 753/2/148. arXiv:1111.1724

  264. [278]

    J. T. A. de Jong, B. Yanny, H.-W. Rix, A. E. Dolphin, N. F. Martin, T. C. Beers, Mapping the Stellar Structure of the Milky Way Thick Disk and Halo Using SEGUE Photometry, Astrophys. J. 714 (2010) 663–674. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/663. arXiv:0911.3900

  265. [279]

    Milgrom, MOND laws of galactic dynamics, Mon

    M. Milgrom, MOND laws of galactic dynamics, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 437 (2014) 2531–2541. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2066. arXiv:1212.2568

  266. [280]

    O. N. Snaith, M. Haywood, P. Di Matteo, M. D. Lehnert, F. Combes, D. Katz, A. G´ omez, The Dominant Epoch of Star Formation in the Milky Way Formed the Thick Disk, Astrophys. J. Lett. 781 (2014) L31. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/781/2/L31. arXiv:1401.1835

  267. [281]

    Snaith, M

    O. Snaith, M. Haywood, P. Di Matteo, M. D. Lehnert, F. Combes, D. Katz, A. G´ omez, Reconstructing the star formation history of the Milky Way disc(s) from chemical abundances, Astron. Astrophys. 578 (2015) A87. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424281. arXiv:1410.3829

  268. [282]

    R. F. G. Wyse, G. Gilmore, Kinematics of the galaxy from a magnitude-limited proper-motion sample., The Astronomical Journal 91 (1986) 855–869. doi: 10.1086/114064

  269. [283]

    D. K. Ojha, O. Bienayme, A. C. Robin, V. Mohan, A multicolor survey of absolute proper motions: galactic structure and kinematics in the direction of the galactic center at intermediate latitude., Astron. Astro- phys. 290 (1994) 771–784. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9407075. a...

  270. [284]

    Fuhrmann, Nearby stars of the Galactic disc and halo - IV, Mon

    K. Fuhrmann, Nearby stars of the Galactic disc and halo - IV, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 384 (2008) 173–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2007.12671.x

  271. [285]

    Bensby, S

    T. Bensby, S. Feltzing, M. S. Oey, Exploring the Milky Way stellar disk. A detailed elemental abundance study of 714 F and G dwarf 208 stars in the solar neighbourhood, Astron. Astrophys. 562 (2014) A71. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322631. arXiv:1309.2631

  272. [286]

    J. Y. Cheng, C. M. Rockosi, H. L. Morrison, Y. S. Lee, T. C. Beers, D. Bizyaev, P. Harding, E. Malanushenko, V. Malanushenko, D. Oravetz, K. Pan, K. J. Schlesinger, D. P. Schneider, A. Sim- mons, B. A. Weaver, A Short Scale Length for the α-enhanced Thick Disk of the Milky Way...

  273. [287]

    Ghosh, F

    S. Ghosh, F. Fragkoudi, P. Di Matteo, K. Saha, Bars and boxy/peanut bulges in thin and thick discs. II. Can bars form in hot thick discs?, Astron. Astrophys. 674 (2023) A128. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 202245275. arXiv:2210.14244

  274. [288]

    J. J. Dalcanton, R. A. Bernstein, A Structural and Dynamical Study of Late-Type, Edge-on Galaxies. II. Vertical Color Gradients and the Detection of Ubiquitous Thick Disks, The Astronomical Journal 124 (2002) 1328–1359. doi: 10.1086/342286. arXiv:astro-ph/0207221

  275. [289]

    Haywood, P

    M. Haywood, P. Di Matteo, M. D. Lehnert, D. Katz, A. G´ omez, The age structure of stellar populations in the solar vicinity. Clues of a two- phase formation history of the Milky Way disk, Astron. Astrophys. 560 (2013) A109. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321397. arXiv:1305.4663

  276. [290]

    Comer´ on, H

    S. Comer´ on, H. Salo, J. H. Knapen, R. F. Peletier, The kine- matics of local thick discs do not support an accretion origin, As- tron. Astrophys. 623 (2019) A89. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833653. arXiv:1901.10294

  277. [296]

    Bovy, H.-W

    J. Bovy, H.-W. Rix, D. W. Hogg, The Milky Way Has No Distinct Thick Disk, Astrophys. J. 751 (2012) 131. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/ 751/2/131. arXiv:1111.6585

  278. [299]

    Pinna, J

    F. Pinna, J. Falc´ on-Barroso, M. Martig, M. Sarzi, L. Coccato, E. Iodice, E. M. Corsini, P. T. de Zeeuw, D. A. Gadotti, R. Leaman, M. Lyuben- ova, R. M. McDermid, I. Minchev, L. Morelli, G. van de Ven, S. Vi- aene, The Fornax 3D project: Unveiling the thick disk origin in FCC...

  279. [591]

    arXiv:astro-ph/9505002

    doi:10.1086/117545. arXiv:astro-ph/9505002

  280. [665]

    arXiv:astro-ph/0408163

    doi:10.1086/430397. arXiv:astro-ph/0408163

  281. [1245]

    arXiv:astro-ph/0701755

    doi:10.1086/513176. arXiv:astro-ph/0701755

  282. [1596]

    arXiv:0712.0816

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.12941.x. arXiv:0712.0816

  283. [2029]

    arXiv:0903.3802

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/2015. arXiv:0903.3802

  284. [2472]

    arXiv:astro-ph/0303275

    doi:10.1086/374627. arXiv:astro-ph/0303275

  285. [2533]

    arXiv:2009.10097

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2924. arXiv:2009.10097. 177

  286. [7321]

    The Vertical Disk Structure, The Astronomical Journal 120 (2000) 1764–1778

    II. The Vertical Disk Structure, The Astronomical Journal 120 (2000) 1764–1778. doi: 10.1086/301555. arXiv:astro-ph/0006412

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.