REVIEW 2 cited by
ComplexCodeEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Code Models on More Complex Code
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In recent years, the application of large language models (LLMs) to code-related tasks has gained significant attention. However, existing evaluation benchmarks often focus on limited scenarios, such as code generation or completion, which do not reflect the diverse challenges developers face in real-world contexts. To address this, we introduce ComplexCodeEval, a benchmark designed to assess LCMs in various development tasks, including code generation, completion, API recommendation, and test case generation. It includes 3,897 Java samples and 7,184 Python samples from high-star GitHub repositories, each annotated with function signatures, docstrings, and API references to simulate real development environments. Our experiments across ten LCMs reveal that context improves performance and that data leakage can lead to overestimation, highlighting the need for more accurate evaluations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Can LLMs Replace Human Evaluators? An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge in Software Engineering
Output-based LLM-as-a-judge methods using large LLMs achieve near-human correlation with human scores for code translation and generation, but not for code summarization or pairwise comparisons.
-
The Current Challenges of Software Engineering in the Era of Large Language Models
The paper reports 26 challenges in LLM-based software engineering, grouped into seven aspects, derived from a structured discussion among 24 academics and practitioners.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.