Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ComplexCodeEval: A Benchmark for Evaluating Large Code Models on More Complex Code

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.10280 v1 pith:LA3WM7EE submitted 2024-09-16 cs.SE

classification cs.SE
keywords codegenerationbenchmarkcompletioncomplexcodeevaldevelopmentlargelcms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, the application of large language models (LLMs) to code-related tasks has gained significant attention. However, existing evaluation benchmarks often focus on limited scenarios, such as code generation or completion, which do not reflect the diverse challenges developers face in real-world contexts. To address this, we introduce ComplexCodeEval, a benchmark designed to assess LCMs in various development tasks, including code generation, completion, API recommendation, and test case generation. It includes 3,897 Java samples and 7,184 Python samples from high-star GitHub repositories, each annotated with function signatures, docstrings, and API references to simulate real development environments. Our experiments across ten LCMs reveal that context improves performance and that data leakage can lead to overestimation, highlighting the need for more accurate evaluations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can LLMs Replace Human Evaluators? An Empirical Study of LLM-as-a-Judge in Software Engineering

    cs.SE 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Output-based LLM-as-a-judge methods using large LLMs achieve near-human correlation with human scores for code translation and generation, but not for code summarization or pairwise comparisons.

  2. The Current Challenges of Software Engineering in the Era of Large Language Models

    cs.SE 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper reports 26 challenges in LLM-based software engineering, grouped into seven aspects, derived from a structured discussion among 24 academics and practitioners.

Pith tools