REVIEW 1 cited by
Double-Estimation-Friendly Inference for High-Dimensional Measurement Error Models with Non-Sparse Adaptability
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this paper, we introduce an innovative testing procedure for assessing individual hypotheses in high-dimensional linear regression models with measurement errors. This method remains robust even when either the X-model or Y-model is misspecified. We develop a double robust score function that maintains a zero expectation if one of the models is incorrect, and we construct a corresponding score test. We first show the asymptotic normality of our approach in a low-dimensional setting, and then extend it to the high-dimensional models. Our analysis of high-dimensional settings explores scenarios both with and without the sparsity condition, establishing asymptotic normality and non-trivial power performance under local alternatives. Simulation studies and real data analysis demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Short Note of Comparison between Convex and Non-convex Penalized Likelihood
Lasso is convex and fast but biased; SCAD and MCP reduce bias but are non-convex and slower, so method choice depends on context.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.