REVIEW 2 cited by
Gradient-Induced Co-Saliency Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Co-saliency detection (Co-SOD) aims to segment the common salient foreground in a group of relevant images. In this paper, inspired by human behavior, we propose a gradient-induced co-saliency detection (GICD) method. We first abstract a consensus representation for the grouped images in the embedding space; then, by comparing the single image with consensus representation, we utilize the feedback gradient information to induce more attention to the discriminative co-salient features. In addition, due to the lack of Co-SOD training data, we design a jigsaw training strategy, with which Co-SOD networks can be trained on general saliency datasets without extra pixel-level annotations. To evaluate the performance of Co-SOD methods on discovering the co-salient object among multiple foregrounds, we construct a challenging CoCA dataset, where each image contains at least one extraneous foreground along with the co-salient object. Experiments demonstrate that our GICD achieves state-of-the-art performance. Our codes and dataset are available at https://mmcheng.net/gicd/.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Design and Simulation of Vehicle Motion Tracking System using a Youla Controller Output Observation System
A Youla controller output observation system with three linear observers and bumpless switching is proposed for estimating vehicle position, heading, and speed from radar measurements, and is shown in simulation to ou...
-
ToonOut: Fine-tuned Background-Removal for Anime Characters
Fine-tuning BiRefNet on a small synthetic anime dataset lifts their test-set pixel accuracy from 95.3% to 99.5%, but the test set is curated from the same distribution.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.