Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

BEACON: JWST NIRCam Pure-parallel Imaging Survey. I. Survey Design and Initial Results

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read No galaxy candidates at z>13 found across 19 independent JWST fields

desk verdict A well-executed survey paper: new pure-parallel fields and a carefully validated selection, with a z>13 null result that is honestly caveated but rests on simulation inputs that deserve scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.04211 v2 pith:LEXSF3J6 submitted 2024-12-05 astro-ph.GA

Takahiro Morishita , Charlotte A. Mason , Kimi C. Kreilgaard , Michele Trenti , Tommaso Treu , Benedetta Vulcani , Yechi Zhang , Abdurro'uf
show 27 more authors
Anahita Alavi Hakim Atek Yannick Bahe Marusa Bradac Larry D. Bradley Andrew J. Bunker Dan Coe James Colbert Viola Gelli Matthew J. Hayes Tucker Jones Tadayuki Kodama Nicha Leethochawalit Zhaoran Liu Matthew A. Malkan Vihang Mehta Benjamin Metha Andrew B. Newman Marc Rafelski Guido Roberts-Borsani Michael J. Rutkowski Claudia Scarlata Massimo Stiavelli Ryo A. Sutanto Kosuke Takahashi Harry I. Teplitz Xin Wang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords BEACONsurveypure-parallelimagingLyman-breakgalaxieshigh-redshiftcosmicvarianceJWSTNIRCamgalaxynumberdensitiesreionization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

BEACON is a JWST Cycle 2 program that uses pure-parallel NIRCam imaging — taking data on a random nearby field while another instrument observes the primary target — to survey roughly a hundred independent sightlines with minimal cosmic variance. In the first 19 fields, covering about $180\,\mathrm{arcmin}^2$ and a comoving volume near $10^5\,\mathrm{Mpc}^3$, the survey photometrically identifies 129 galaxy candidates at $z>7$, including 11 at $z>10$. The number densities inferred at $713$ galaxy candidates are found in this large, statistically independent volume. The paper argues this may indicate that the bright $z>13$ sources reported in small legacy fields are enhanced by cosmic variance rather than typical of the early Universe.

What carries the argument

The argument rests on three pieces. The first is the pure-parallel observing strategy itself: NIRCam images are taken while another JWST instrument observes the primary target, so the parallel fields cannot be chosen in advance and are statistically independent sightlines. The second is the Lyman-break dropout method, in which a galaxy is selected by requiring a detection redward of the Lyman break and a non-detection in the bluer filters, with three dropout classes (F090W, F115W, F150W) covering $z\sim7.3$--$9.7$, $z\sim9.7$--$13$, and $z\sim13$--$18$. The third is the per-field effective-volume calculation, $V_{\rm eff} = \int (dV/dz)\,P(M_{\rm recov}, z)\,dz$, populated by an adaptation of the GLACiAR2 completeness simulation that injects 1200 galaxies per magnitude--redshift bin, with Sersic $n=1$ profiles, sizes drawn from the $M_{\rm UV}$--size relation, and JAGUAR spectral templates, and then reruns the full detection, photometry, and selection on every field. This recovery-probability machinery converts raw counts into number densities and upper limits, and it is what makes the $z>13$ null statistically meaningful.

What would settle it

Recompute the $z>13$ effective volume using simulated galaxies that are a factor of two smaller and redder than the default profiles and templates; if that volume drops substantially, the zero-candidate result no longer constrains cosmic variance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using the first 19 fields of the BEACON pure-parallel program, the paper establishes a census of ultraviolet-selected galaxies at $z>7$ that is nearly free of cosmic variance. After Lyman-break dropout selection and photometric-redshift filtering with six to eight NIRCam filters, the team catalogues 129 candidates: 118 F090W dropouts spanning roughly $z\simeq7.3$--$9.7$, 11 F115W dropouts at $z\simeq9.7$--$13$, and zero F150W dropouts at $z\simeq13$--$18$. The sample includes 11 galaxies at $z>10$ and several UV-luminous sources with $M_{\rm UV}<-21$ mag at $z\sim8$. The number densities at $7<z<13$ are consistent with previous measurements and with the constant star-formation efficiency model. The paper's central result is that, despite an effective volume of roughly $10^5\,\mathrm{Mpc}^3$, no $z>13$ candidate survives, and the resulting upper limits are consistent with previous surveys except at the bright end of one previous measurement containing the source GS-z14-0; the paper interprets this as evidence that the bright $z>13$ sources in legacy fields may be affected by cosmic variance.

Load-bearing premise

The number densities and the $z>13$ upper limits assume that the simulated galaxies used to calibrate each field look like real $z>7$ galaxies in size and color; if real galaxies are much more compact or much redder than the assumed shapes, the recovery fractions and volumes could shift enough to change the null.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the null persists across the full survey, the bright end of the $z>13$ luminosity function is lower than the abundance of sources like GS-z14-0 in legacy fields would suggest.
  • The full BEACON sample of roughly 100 fields will reduce cosmic variance in the bright-end UV luminosity function at $z\sim12$ to about 5 percent, turning field-to-field scatter into a measured quantity rather than a dominant uncertainty.
  • The 129 DR1 candidates, including 11 at $z>10$, provide a target list for JWST spectroscopy that can confirm redshifts and measure the stellar populations of some of the first galaxies.
  • The survey design shows that pure-parallel observations can deliver legacy-quality catalogs for lower-redshift science, including massive quiescent galaxies at $z\sim2$ and brown dwarfs in the Milky Way.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable consequence left implicit by the paper: if the $z>13$ null is real, the UV luminosity function must turn over faster than the extrapolation of the $z\sim11$ Schechter function, and star-formation models would need to reduce the predicted abundance of bright galaxies.
  • BEACON's DR1 fields could be combined with legacy fields in a joint likelihood that treats cosmic variance as a free parameter, directly estimating how much of the early JWST tension over bright galaxies is field sampling.
  • Spectroscopic confirmation of the DR1 $z\sim8$ UV-luminous candidates would check whether the bright end at $z\sim8$ is genuinely as populated as the number densities imply, or whether it is contaminated by lower-redshift line emitters.
  • Applying the same effective-volume machinery to previously published $z>13$ candidates in legacy fields would test whether the discrepancy with the BEACON null survives completeness corrections.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper introduces BEACON, a JWST Cycle 2 NIRCam pure-parallel survey designed to find z>7 galaxies over about 100 independent sightlines. Using the first 19 fields covering roughly 180 arcmin^2, the authors reduce NIRCam images in six to eight filters, apply Lyman-break dropout plus photometric-redshift selection, and identify 129 z>7 candidates (118 F090W dropouts, 11 F115W dropouts, and zero F150W dropouts). They estimate number densities at 7<z<13 using field-dependent effective volumes from completeness simulations, finding densities overall consistent with previous surveys. The headline result is that no z>13 candidates are found despite a volume of about 10^5 Mpc^3, which the authors interpret as indicating that the bright z>13 sources reported in some legacy fields may be enhanced by cosmic variance. The paper also presents public data products and several ancillary science cases.

Significance. The survey design is well suited to its goal: many independent sightlines reduce cosmic variance relative to contiguous legacy fields, and the initial dataset is a useful community resource. The photometric selection is described carefully and is externally validated against 12 of 13 spectroscopically confirmed z>10 sources, the number densities use Gehrels small-number uncertainties, and the completeness simulation accounts for field-to-field depth variations. If the zero z>13 result is robust, it is an important complement to the small number of legacy fields. The main caveat is that the z>13 upper limits inherit completeness corrections from simulated SEDs and sizes that are not externally calibrated in exactly the redshift range of the headline claim; the authors' own remark in Sec. 5.2 that the z>10 selection 'seems to be too conservative' makes this caveat relevant. With additional robustness tests, the paper would provide a solid quantitative basis for the cosmic-variance interpretation.

major comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 5.3, Eq. (1)] The definition of P(Mrecov, z) is internally inconsistent. The text says the numerator counts simulated galaxies 'recovered to have UV magnitude in the bin Mrecov (regardless of their intrinsic UV magnitude)', while the denominator is 'the number of injected galaxies at redshift z with intrinsic UV magnitude equal to Mrecov'. If the numerator includes sources that scatter in from other magnitude bins but the denominator includes only sources with intrinsic magnitude Mrecov, P can exceed unity and the effective volumes in Table 2 are not a standard completeness-weighted volume. Please clarify the intended definition or correct the formula, and state explicitly whether the implementation matches the original Leethochawalit et al. (2023) convention, since Table 2 is load-bearing for both the number densities and the z>13 upper limits.
  2. [Sec. 5.3 and Table 2] The z>13 null result rests on a completeness simulation whose redshift range of interest uses a single pooled JAGUAR z>12 spectral bin and sizes drawn from the Morishita et al. (2024b) M_UV-size relation. The 12/13 recovery test in Sec. 5.2 is encouraging, but it validates the selection mostly at z=10-13 and at the bright end, not at z>13; the authors themselves note in Sec. 5.2 that the z>10 selection 'seems to be too conservative'. I request robustness tests of the effective volumes and upper limits against (i) alternative SED shapes, including higher Lyman-continuum escape fractions and bluer or redder UV slopes, and (ii) sizes bracketing the adopted size-luminosity relation by factors of two. If the effective volume in the F150W-dropout rows of Table 2 changes substantially under these bracketing assumptions, the abstract's 'no galaxy candidates at z>13' statement should be correspondingly qualified.
  3. [Sec. 5.2 and Table 2] The interpretation that the zero z>13 count 'may suggest a significant impact from cosmic variance' should be supported by a quantitative statement of the expected number of z>13 sources under the Robertson et al. (2024) LF that contains GS-z14-0, given the BEACON effective volumes. As written, the reader cannot tell whether the absence is a 1-sigma, 2-sigma, or 3-sigma tension with that LF, and the paper's own comparison says the upper limits are consistent with most previous studies. Adding the expected counts and the corresponding Poisson confidence level would make the cosmic-variance claim easier to evaluate.
  4. [Sec. 4.4] For the F150W-dropout selection, the stated redshift window is 13<z<18 but the photometric-redshift threshold is zset=10, so the criterion p(z>10)>0.8 is weaker than p(z>13)>0.8. Please confirm that the F150W non-detection requirement effectively enforces z>13, or change zset to 13 so that the selected sample and the completeness volume are both defined over the same redshift range.
  5. [Sec. 4.4 and Table 3] The F090W-dropout window is quoted as 7.3<z<9.7 with zset=6, while several entries in Table 3 have photometric redshifts near z~7.0 and the paper describes the sample as z>7. Please clarify the adopted lower boundary of the F090W-dropout selection and why some candidates fall below 7.3.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 5.3] Please state the total number of injected galaxies per magnitude-redshift bin (the current text says 1200 galaxies are injected 'into each magnitude-redshift bin' but the exact binning of the injection is not fully specified).
  2. [Table 2 and Fig. 8] The text says that magnitude bins without sources are shown as 2-sigma upper limits, but the table note says the uncertainties are calculated as in Gehrels (1986), which is usually quoted at 1 sigma. Please specify the confidence level of the upper limits consistently in the table, figure, and text.
  3. [Abstract and Sec. 6] The word 'complimentary' should be 'complementary' in the abstract and in Sec. 6.
  4. [Fig. 8] Adding the expected BEACON count under the Robertson et al. (2024) LF in the z~15 panel would help the reader see whether the zero count is actually in tension with that LF.
  5. [Sec. 3.3] The filter configuration description could mention which DR1 fields actually used the optional medium-band filters (e.g., F140M, F182M, F410M, F430M, F480M), since Table 1 does not list medium-band depths and the photometric-redshift quality in fields such as 1420+5252 depends on them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the survey counts and number densities are benchmarked against external data; the completeness simulation inputs are assumptions, not fitted outputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained for its central claims. High-redshift candidates are selected by dropout color criteria and photometric-redshift filtering (Sec. 4.4), and the resulting counts are converted to number densities using effective volumes from an injection-recovery completeness simulation (Sec. 5.3). No equation in this chain uses the target number density as an input: the effective volume is measured by injecting galaxies with assumed Sersic profiles, JAGUAR SEDs, and a size-luminosity relation from Morishita et al. (2024b), then rerunning the same detection and selection steps. These are modeling assumptions, not fitted parameters that reappear as predictions. The paper explicitly tests its selection against external spec-z sources: 'we confirmed that our color selection would successfully reproduce 12 of the 13 sources at zspec > 10' (Sec. 5.2), and it compares its number densities with many independent literature surveys (Sec. 5.3, Fig. 8). The zero-count at z>13 is a direct observational result (zero F150W dropouts), and the accompanying upper limits are stated with their dependence on the completeness simulation. The authors also flag their own selection-robustness concern in Sec. 5.2 ('we seem to be lacking luminous (< -20 mag) galaxies at z >10, casting a doubt on our selection being too conservative'), which is a limitation explicitly acknowledged rather than hidden. The same-author size relation used in the completeness simulation is a mild self-citation, but it is not load-bearing in a circular sense: the paper's headline comparisons are against external data, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported to force the conclusion. The Schechter fit and the full-survey yield estimate are descriptive or extrapolative, not circular predictions. Overall, the analysis is externally benchmarked and the central claims do not reduce to their inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's claims rest on standard photometric selection methods and adopted cosmology/IMF. The only notable assumption is the completeness simulation's template and size priors, partly from same-author work. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Schechter LF alpha (7.3<z<9.7) = -2.07(+0.23/-0.18)
    Fitted to BEACON DR1 number counts; not used as a prediction, but an output of the MCMC fit.
  • Schechter LF log phi* (7.3<z<9.7) = -4.66(+0.53/-0.44)
    Fitted to BEACON DR1 number counts.
  • Schechter LF M* (7.3<z<9.7) = -21.97(+0.73/-0.66)
    Fitted to BEACON DR1 number counts.
  • Schechter LF log phi* (9.7<z<13) = -4.57(+2.10/-0.96)
    Fitted to BEACON DR1 number counts with alpha fixed to -2.
  • Schechter LF M* (9.7<z<13) = -21.01(+1.61/-1.45)
    Fitted to BEACON DR1 number counts.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Cosmological parameters Omega_m=0.3, Omega_Lambda=0.7, H0=70 km/s/Mpc
    Adopted in Section 1 for volume and luminosity distance calculations.
  • domain assumption Chabrier (2003) initial mass function
    Used for stellar population template fitting and mass estimates; standard in the field.
  • domain assumption Lyman-break dropout technique assumes a sharp spectral break at rest-frame 1216 Angstrom for z>7 galaxies
    Central to the color selection in Section 4.4; assumes intergalactic medium absorption and no blue continuum.
  • domain assumption Injected completeness galaxies follow Sersic n=1 profiles with sizes from Morishita et al. (2024b) and SEDs from JAGUAR
    Used in Section 5.3 to compute effective volumes; if real galaxies differ, number densities and z>13 upper limits shift.
  • domain assumption Photometric redshift template library from Hainline et al. (2023) adequately represents high-z galaxy SEDs
    Used in EAZY fits (Section 4.3); incomplete templates would bias photo-z estimates.
  • domain assumption Cosmic variance calculator of Trapp & Furlanetto (2020) correctly predicts field-to-field variance
    Used in Section 2 to argue BEACON reduces cosmic variance; not central to DR1 results.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of BEACON: JWST NIRCam Pure-parallel Imaging Survey. I. Survey Design and Initial Results." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LEXSF3J6

@misc{pith2026241204211,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: BEACON: JWST NIRCam Pure-parallel Imaging Survey. I. Survey Design and Initial Results},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LEXSF3J6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.04211}
}
abstract

We introduce the Bias-free Extragalactic Analysis for Cosmic Origins with NIRCam (BEACON) survey, a JWST Cycle2 program allocated up to 600 pure-parallel hours of observations. BEACON explores high-latitude areas of the sky with JWST/NIRCam over $\sim100$ independent sightlines, totaling $\sim0.3$deg$^2$, reaching a median F444W depth of $\approx28.2$AB mag (5$\sigma$). Based on existing JWST observations in legacy fields, we estimate that BEACON will photometrically identify 25--150 galaxies at $z>10$ and 500--1000 at $z\sim7$--10 uniquely enabled by an efficient multiple filter configuration spanning $0.9$--5.0$\mu$m. The expected sample size of $z>10$ galaxies will allow us to obtain robust number density estimates and to discriminate between different models of early star formation. In this paper, we present an overview of the survey design and initial results using the first 19 fields. We present 129 galaxy candidates at $z>7$ identified in those fields, including 11 galaxies at $z>10$ and several UV-luminous ($M_{\rm UV}<-21$mag) galaxies at $z\sim8$. The number densities of $z<13$ galaxies inferred from the initial fields are overall consistent with those in the literature. Despite reaching a considerably large volume ($\sim10^5$Mpc$^3$), however, we find no galaxy candidates at $z>13$, providing us with a complimentary insight into early galaxy evolution with minimal cosmic variance. We publish imaging and catalog data products for these initial fields. Upon survey completion, all BEACON data will be coherently processed and distributed to the community along with catalogs for redshift and other physical quantities.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.04211 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Left): Schematics of NIRCam pure-parallel imaging. Each pair of squares (orange) indicates the size of NIRCam imaging fields, overlaid on dark matter distribution at z = 10 from the THESAN simulation (Kannan et al. 2022, each of the nine panel has a size of ∼ 95 cMpc), where halos hosting massive galaxies (> 108 M⊙) are encircled. For comparison, Cycle 1 and 2 surveys in legacy fields are shown (gray). (Right): Cos… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Expected numbers of sources in BEACON, shown for two theoretical models: constant star-formation efficiency (dark blue, Mason et al. 2015, 2023) and bursty star-formation (light blue, Gelli et al. 2024), and for two data-driven LFs: one determined from HST (red, Bouwens et al. 2021) and one from JWST Cycle 1 (orange, Donnan et al. 2024). All numbers are estimated assuming a flat 80% completeness down to the 10σ limi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Template SEDs of galaxies at various redshifts, along with the transmission curves of our default filter set. JWST offers a pure-parallel observing mode2 , in which one instrument is used while another serves as the pri￾mary. This is similar to the pure parallel mode operated by HST (Atek et al. 2011; Trenti et al. 2011; Yan et al. 2011). With JWST, pure-parallel observations can uti￾lize a variety of instruments (i… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (T op): Sky distributions of the 19 BEACON DR1 fields (orange squares), overlaid on a temperature map from the WMAP 7-yr data (Jarosik et al. 2011). Also shown are legacy fields of JWST (COSMOS-Web, PRIMER-UDS, CEERS￾EGS, JADES-GOODS-South, JADES-GOODS-North, and Abell…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Limiting magnitudes and survey areas of various JWST programs (symbols in color). Square and cross symbols represent pure-parallel and for legacy surveys, respectively. Several HST programs are also shown in gray (see Morishita 2021 for the full description). The regio…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Redshift-MUV distributions of final photometric candidates selected from the 19 DR1 fields (circles, colored by redshift). Semi-empirical luminosity evolution curves, ∝ (1 + z) −4.5 , of halos of a given comoving abundance are shown (dashed lines). Spectroscopically co…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Postage stamps and SEDs of example high-z galaxy candidates. The best-fit flux models at high redshift (orange lines) and at the secondary low redshift (zlow, gray line) are shown. Photometric redshift probability distributions derived from EAzY are shown in the inset.…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Number densities estimated for the Beacon DR1 sources (red circles and upper limits), at z ∼ 8.5 (left top), z ∼ 11 (right top), and z ∼ 15 (bottom). For magnitude bins without any sources, we show 2-σ upper limits. The Schechter fit to our number density estimates is …
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Examples of low-z sources from BEACON. The figure format is the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mass--size evolution and the emerging passive--density relation revealed by JWST/NIRCam in the Spiderweb protocluster

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In the Spiderweb protocluster, passive fraction rises with local density to ~60% while passive mass–size intercepts sit between field and cluster values, indicating advanced quenching but ongoing size growth.

  2. Metallicity Scatter Originating from Sub-kiloparsec Starbursting Clumps in the Core of a Protocluster at z=7.88

    astro-ph.GA 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Spatially resolved JWST spectroscopy of a z=7.88 merging system reveals up to about 1 dex internal scatter in oxygen abundance, anchored by a direct electron-temperature measurement of 7.4 in one starbursting clump.

  3. On the Size of the Mission Suite Enabled by NASA's Deep Space Network

    astro-ph.IM 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The Deep Space Network can likely support 40 to 70 missions, with the upper end conditional on making antennas interchangeable.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

187 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    HB IPtQS kZ k<װ 5p1 7 ОpX *XK#6N Vn99)i g +8+TY ΋Uyi+8oD `F_4 Jv+TI >' Rx ؜GM N 9 + 9]c=^ v zb5/ Zgt 6 ^B Jԉ #v =ԐJk 僴,]

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    J., Conselice , C

    Adams , N. J., Conselice , C. J., Austin , D., et al. 2024, , 965, 169, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a7b

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a7b 2024

  5. [5]

    L., et al

    Arrabal Haro , P., Dickinson , M., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.05378, 10.48550/arXiv.2304.05378

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.05378 2023

  6. [6]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  7. [7]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  8. [8]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

Show all 187 references
  1. [9]

    2011, , 743, 121, 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/121

    Atek , H., Siana , B., Scarlata , C., et al. 2011, , 743, 121, 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/121

    2011 doi

  2. [10]

    B., Finkelstein , S

    Bagley , M. B., Finkelstein , S. L., Koekemoer , A. M., et al. 2023, , 946, L12, 10.3847/2041-8213/acbb08

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    M., Koo , D

    Barro , G., Faber , S. M., Koo , D. C., et al. 2017, , 840, 47, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6b05

    2017 doi

  4. [12]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.08052, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.08052

    Barrufet , L., Oesch , P., Marques-Chaves , R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.08052, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.08052

    2024 doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    2018, ArXiv e-prints

    Behroozi , P., Wechsler , R., Hearin , A., & Conroy , C. 2018, ArXiv e-prints. 1806.07893

    2018 arXiv

  6. [14]

    R., Carrasco , D., Trenti , M., et al

    Bernard , S. R., Carrasco , D., Trenti , M., et al. 2016, , 827, 76, 10.3847/0004-637X/827/1/76

    2016 doi

  7. [15]

    1996, , 117, 393

    Bertin , E., & Arnouts , S. 1996, , 117, 393

    1996

  8. [16]

    K., Somerville , R

    Bhowmick , A. K., Somerville , R. S., Di Matteo , T., et al. 2020, , 496, 754, 10.1093/mnras/staa1605

    2020 doi

  9. [17]

    2016, , 596, A63, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629080

    Boucaud , A., Bocchio , M., Abergel , A., et al. 2016, , 596, A63, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629080

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.06683

    Bouwens , R., Illingworth , G., Oesch , P., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.06683. 2212.06683

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    J., Stefanon , M., Oesch , P

    Bouwens , R. J., Stefanon , M., Oesch , P. A., et al. 2019, , 880, 25, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab24c5

    2019 doi

  12. [20]

    J., Illingworth , G

    Bouwens , R. J., Illingworth , G. D., Oesch , P. A., et al. 2010, , 709, L133, 10.1088/2041-8205/709/2/L133

    2010 doi

  13. [21]

    2015, , 803, 34, 10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/34

    ---. 2015, , 803, 34, 10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/34

    2015 doi

  14. [22]

    J., Oesch , P

    Bouwens , R. J., Oesch , P. A., Stefanon , M., et al. 2021, , 162, 47, 10.3847/1538-3881/abf83e

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    Bowler , R. A. A., Jarvis , M. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2020, , 493, 2059, 10.1093/mnras/staa313

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    Bowler , R. A. A., Dunlop , J. S., McLure , R. J., et al. 2014, , 440, 2810, 10.1093/mnras/stu449

    2014 doi

  17. [25]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.01611

    Boylan-Kolchin , M. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.01611. 2208.01611

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    2023, larrybradley/lacosmic: 1.1.0 , 1.1.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.10145563

    Bradley , L. 2023, larrybradley/lacosmic: 1.1.0 , 1.1.0, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.10145563

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    D., Trenti , M., Oesch , P

    Bradley , L. D., Trenti , M., Oesch , P. A., et al. 2012, , 760, 108, 10.1088/0004-637X/760/2/108

    2012 doi

  20. [28]

    2022, grizli , 1.5.0, Zenodo, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.6672538

    Brammer , G., Strait , V., Matharu , J., & Momcheva , I. 2022, grizli , 1.5.0, Zenodo, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.6672538

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    B., van Dokkum , P

    Brammer , G. B., van Dokkum , P. G., & Coppi , P. 2008, , 686, 1503, 10.1086/591786

    2008 doi

  22. [30]

    S., Holwerda , B

    Bridge , J. S., Holwerda , B. W., Stefanon , M., et al. 2019, , 882, 42, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3213

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    J., Stanway , E

    Bunker , A. J., Stanway , E. R., Ellis , R. S., & McMahon , R. G. 2004, , 355, 374, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08326.x

    2004

  24. [32]

    J., Wilkins , S., Ellis , R

    Bunker , A. J., Wilkins , S., Ellis , R. S., et al. 2010, , 409, 855, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17350.x

    2010

  25. [33]

    J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A

    Bunker , A. J., Saxena , A., Cameron , A. J., et al. 2023, , 677, A88, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346159

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    J., Bezanson , R., Labbe , I., et al

    Burgasser , A. J., Bezanson , R., Labbe , I., et al. 2024, , 962, 177, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad206f

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    2016, , 817, 120, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/120

    Calvi , V., Trenti , M., Stiavelli , M., et al. 2016, , 817, 120, 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/120

    2016 doi

  28. [36]

    J., Trenti , M., Livermore , R

    Cameron , A. J., Trenti , M., Livermore , R. C., & van der Velden , C. 2019, , 483, 1922, 10.1093/mnras/sty3069

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    A., Clayton , G

    Cardelli , J. A., Clayton , G. C., & Mathis , J. S. 1989, , 345, 245, 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  30. [38]

    C., McLeod , D

    Carnall , A. C., McLeod , D. J., McLure , R. J., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.00986. 2208.00986

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    C., McLure , R

    Carnall , A. C., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2023, , 619, 716, 10.1038/s41586-023-06158-6

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    2024, , 633, 318, 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    Carniani , S., Hainline , K., D'Eugenio , F., et al. 2024, , 633, 318, 10.1038/s41586-024-07860-9

    2024 doi

  33. [41]

    M., Kartaltepe , J

    Casey , C. M., Kartaltepe , J. S., Drakos , N. E., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2211.07865, 10.48550/arXiv.2211.07865

    2022 doi arXiv

  34. [42]

    M., Akins , H

    Casey , C. M., Akins , H. B., Shuntov , M., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.10932, 10.48550/arXiv.2308.10932

    2023 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    2022, , 938, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac94d0

    Castellano , M., Fontana , A., Treu , T., et al. 2022, , 938, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac94d0

    2022 doi

  36. [44]

    2024, , 972, 143, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    Castellano , M., Napolitano , L., Fontana , A., et al. 2024, , 972, 143, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f88

    2024 doi

  37. [45]

    2003, , 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier , G. 2003, , 115, 763, 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  38. [46]

    B., Wang , F., Yang , J., et al

    Champagne , J. B., Wang , F., Yang , J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.03827, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.03827

    2024 doi arXiv

  39. [47]

    P., Endsley , R., et al

    Chen , Z., Stark , D. P., Endsley , R., et al. 2023, , 518, 5607, 10.1093/mnras/stac3476

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    E., & White , M

    Conroy , C., Gunn , J. E., & White , M. 2009, , 699, 486, 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486

    2009 doi

  41. [49]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.04568

    Curtis-Lake , E., Carniani , S., Cameron , A., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.04568. 2212.04568

    2022 arXiv

  42. [50]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 622, 10.1038/s41550-023-01918-w

    ---. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 622, 10.1038/s41550-023-01918-w

    2023 doi

  43. [51]

    2005, , 626, 680, 10.1086/430104

    Daddi , E., Renzini , A., Pirzkal , N., et al. 2005, , 626, 680, 10.1086/430104

    2005 doi

  44. [52]

    J., Abraham , R

    Damjanov , I., McCarthy , P. J., Abraham , R. G., et al. 2009, , 695, 101, 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/101

    2009 doi

  45. [53]

    2017, , 605, A70, 10.1051/0004-6361/201730419

    Davidzon , I., Ilbert , O., Laigle , C., et al. 2017, , 605, A70, 10.1051/0004-6361/201730419

    2017 doi

  46. [54]

    S., & Pacucci , F

    Dayal , P., Ferrara , A., Dunlop , J. S., & Pacucci , F. 2014, , 445, 2545, 10.1093/mnras/stu1848

    2014 doi

  47. [55]

    J., Brammer , G., et al

    de Graaff , A., Setton , D. J., Brammer , G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.05683, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.05683

    2024 doi arXiv

  48. [56]

    T., McLeod , D

    Donnan , C. T., McLeod , D. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2022, arXiv:2207.12356. 2207.12356

    2022 arXiv

  49. [57]

    T., McLure , R

    Donnan , C. T., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2024, , 533, 3222, 10.1093/mnras/stae2037

    2024 doi

  50. [58]

    S., McLure , R

    Ellis , R. S., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2013, , 763, L7, 10.1088/2041-8205/763/1/L7

    2013 doi

  51. [59]

    G., & Elmegreen , D

    Elmegreen , B. G., & Elmegreen , D. M. 2005, , 627, 632, 10.1086/430514

    2005 doi

  52. [60]

    P., Whitler , L., et al

    Endsley , R., Stark , D. P., Whitler , L., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.14999. 2208.14999

    2022 arXiv

  53. [61]

    J., et al

    Ferreira , L., Adams , N., Conselice , C. J., et al. 2022, , 938, L2, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac947c

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    L., Bagley , M

    Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M. B., Haro , P. A., et al. 2022, , 940, L55, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac966e

    2022 doi

  55. [63]

    W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Hogg , D. W., Lang , D., & Goodman , J. 2013, , 125, 306, 10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  56. [64]

    M., Genzel , R., Bouch \'e , N., et al

    F \"o rster Schreiber , N. M., Genzel , R., Bouch \'e , N., et al. 2009, , 706, 1364, 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/1364

    2009 doi

  57. [65]

    B., Casey , C

    Franco , M., Akins , H. B., Casey , C. M., et al. 2024, , 973, 23, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5e6a

    2024 doi

  58. [66]

    K., & Sugahara , Y

    Fudamoto , Y., Inoue , A. K., & Sugahara , Y. 2022, , 938, L24, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac982b

    2022 doi

  59. [67]

    E., et al

    Fukugita , M., Ichikawa , T., Gunn , J. E., et al. 1996, , 111, 1748, 10.1086/117915

    1996 doi

  60. [68]

    1986, , 303, 336, 10.1086/164079

    Gehrels , N. 1986, , 303, 336, 10.1086/164079

    1986 doi

  61. [69]

    Gelli , V., Mason , C., & Hayward , C. C. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.13108, 10.48550/arXiv.2405.13108

    2024 doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    2011, , 733, 101, 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/101

    Genzel , R., Newman , S., Jones , T., et al. 2011, , 733, 101, 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/101

    2011 doi

  63. [71]

    2017, , 544, 71, 10.1038/nature21680

    Glazebrook , K., Schreiber , C., Labb \'e , I., et al. 2017, , 544, 71, 10.1038/nature21680

    2017 doi

  64. [72]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.05606, 10.48550/arXiv.2308.05606

    Glazebrook , K., Nanayakkara , T., Schreiber , C., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.05606, 10.48550/arXiv.2308.05606

    2023 doi arXiv

  65. [73]

    2024, , 628, 277, 10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9

    ---. 2024, , 628, 277, 10.1038/s41586-024-07191-9

    2024 doi

  66. [74]

    E., Labbe , I., Goulding , A

    Greene , J. E., Labbe , I., Goulding , A. D., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.05714, 10.48550/arXiv.2309.05714

    2023 doi arXiv

  67. [75]

    A., Kocevski , D

    Grogin , N. A., Kocevski , D. D., Faber , S. M., et al. 2011, , 197, 35, 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35

    2011 doi

  68. [76]

    Z., Wang , T., & Fu , H

    Guo , K., Zheng , X. Z., Wang , T., & Fu , H. 2015, , 808, L49, 10.1088/2041-8205/808/2/L49

    2015 doi

  69. [77]

    L., et al

    Guo , Y., Jogee , S., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2210.08658. 2210.08658

    2022 arXiv

  70. [78]

    N., Johnson , B

    Hainline , K. N., Johnson , B. D., Robertson , B., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.02468, 10.48550/arXiv.2306.02468

    2023 doi arXiv

  71. [79]

    N., Helton , J

    Hainline , K. N., Helton , J. M., Johnson , B. D., et al. 2024, , 964, 66, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad20d1

    2024 doi

  72. [80]

    2023 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.06658, 10.48550/arXiv.2304.06658

    Harikane , Y., Nakajima , K., Ouchi , M., et al. 2023 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.06658, 10.48550/arXiv.2304.06658

    2023 doi arXiv

  73. [81]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.01612

    Harikane , Y., Ouchi , M., Oguri , M., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2208.01612. 2208.01612

    2022 arXiv

  74. [82]

    2023 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.11946, 10.48550/arXiv.2303.11946

    Harikane , Y., Zhang , Y., Nakajima , K., et al. 2023 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.11946, 10.48550/arXiv.2303.11946

    2023 doi arXiv

  75. [83]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  76. [84]

    W., Trenti , M., Clarkson , W., et al

    Holwerda , B. W., Trenti , M., Clarkson , W., et al. 2014, , 788, 77, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/77

    2014 doi

  77. [85]

    W., Bridge , J

    Holwerda , B. W., Bridge , J. S., Ryan , R., et al. 2018, , 620, A132, 10.1051/0004-6361/201832838

    2018 doi

  78. [86]

    D., Magee , D., Oesch , P

    Illingworth , G. D., Magee , D., Oesch , P. A., et al. 2013, , 209, 6, 10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/6

    2013 doi

  79. [87]

    2018, , 617, A130, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833053

    Inami , H., Armus , L., Matsuhara , H., et al. 2018, , 617, A130, 10.1051/0004-6361/201833053

    2018 doi

  80. [88]

    2018, , 854, 73, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa544

    Ishigaki , M., Kawamata , R., Ouchi , M., et al. 2018, , 854, 73, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa544

    2018 doi

  81. [89]

    2022, , 936, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8874

    Ishikawa , Y., Morishita , T., Stiavelli , M., et al. 2022, , 936, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8874

    2022 doi

  82. [90]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2307.06994, 10.48550/arXiv.2307.06994

    Ito , K., Valentino , F., Brammer , G., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2307.06994, 10.48550/arXiv.2307.06994

    2023 doi arXiv

  83. [91]

    L., Dunkley , J., et al

    Jarosik , N., Bennett , C. L., Dunkley , J., et al. 2011, , 192, 14, 10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/14

    2011 doi

  84. [92]

    L., Larson , R

    Jung , I., Finkelstein , S. L., Larson , R. L., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.09850, 10.48550/arXiv.2212.09850

    2022 doi arXiv

  85. [93]

    2022, , 511, 4005, 10.1093/mnras/stab3710

    Kannan , R., Garaldi , E., Smith , A., et al. 2022, , 511, 4005, 10.1093/mnras/stab3710

    2022 doi

  86. [94]

    J., Saxena , A., et al

    Katz , H., Cameron , A. J., Saxena , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.03189, 10.48550/arXiv.2408.03189

    2024 doi arXiv

  87. [95]

    D., Onoue , M., Inayoshi , K., et al

    Kocevski , D. D., Onoue , M., Inayoshi , K., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.00012, 10.48550/arXiv.2302.00012

    2023 doi arXiv

  88. [96]

    M., Faber , S

    Koekemoer , A. M., Faber , S. M., Ferguson , H. C., et al. 2011, , 197, 36, 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36

    2011 doi

  89. [97]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.04777, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.04777

    Kokubo , M., & Harikane , Y. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.04777, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.04777

    2024 doi

  90. [98]

    E., Bezanson , R., et al

    Labbe , I., Greene , J. E., Bezanson , R., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.07320, 10.48550/arXiv.2306.07320

    2023 doi arXiv

  91. [99]

    L., Finkelstein , S

    Larson , R. L., Finkelstein , S. L., Hutchison , T. A., et al. 2022, , 930, 104, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5dbd

    2022 doi

  92. [100]

    L., Finkelstein , S

    Larson , R. L., Finkelstein , S. L., Kocevski , D. D., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.08918, 10.48550/arXiv.2303.08918

    2023 doi arXiv

  93. [101]

    2023, , 524, 5454, 10.1093/mnras/stad2202

    Leethochawalit , N., Roberts-Borsani , G., Morishita , T., Trenti , M., & Treu , T. 2023, , 524, 5454, 10.1093/mnras/stad2202

    2023 doi

  94. [102]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.11135

    Leethochawalit , N., Trenti , M., Santini , P., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.11135. 2207.11135

    2022 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Leung , G. C. K., Bagley , M. B., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2023, , 954, L46, 10.3847/2041-8213/acf365

    2023 doi

  96. [104]

    C., Trenti , M., Bradley , L

    Livermore , R. C., Trenti , M., Bradley , L. D., et al. 2018, , 861, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/aacd16

    2018 doi

  97. [105]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.05362, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.05362

    Llerena , M., Amor \' n , R., Pentericci , L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.05362, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.05362

    2024 doi arXiv

  98. [106]

    C., Harrison , I., Harikane , Y., Tacchella , S., & Wilkins , S

    Lovell , C. C., Harrison , I., Harikane , Y., Tacchella , S., & Wilkins , S. M. 2023, , 518, 2511, 10.1093/mnras/stac3224

    2023 doi

  99. [107]

    C., Dickinson , M

    Madau , P., Ferguson , H. C., Dickinson , M. E., et al. 1996, , 283, 1388

    1996

  100. [108]

    A., & Loeb , A

    Mashian , N., Oesch , P. A., & Loeb , A. 2016, , 455, 2101, 10.1093/mnras/stv2469

    2016 doi

  101. [109]

    A., Trenti , M., & Treu , T

    Mason , C. A., Trenti , M., & Treu , T. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.14808. 2207.14808

    2022 arXiv

  102. [110]

    2023, , 521, 497, 10.1093/mnras/stad035

    ---. 2023, , 521, 497, 10.1093/mnras/stad035

    2023 doi

  103. [111]

    A., Treu , T., Schmidt , K

    Mason , C. A., Treu , T., Schmidt , K. B., et al. 2015, , 805, 79, 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/79

    2015 doi

  104. [112]

    P., Brammer , G., et al

    Matthee , J., Naidu , R. P., Brammer , G., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.05448, 10.48550/arXiv.2306.05448

    2023 doi arXiv

  105. [113]

    J., Donnan , C

    McLeod , D. J., Donnan , C. T., McLure , R. J., et al. 2024, , 527, 5004, 10.1093/mnras/stad3471

    2024 doi

  106. [114]

    2021, , 253, 4, 10.3847/1538-4365/abce67

    Morishita , T. 2021, , 253, 4, 10.3847/1538-4365/abce67

    2021 doi

  107. [115]

    2023, mtakahiro/bbpn: v1.3, v1.3, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.10067906

    Morishita, T. 2023, mtakahiro/bbpn: v1.3, v1.3, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.10067906

    2023 doi

  108. [116]

    2023, , 946, L35, 10.3847/2041-8213/acbf50

    Morishita , T., & Stiavelli , M. 2023, , 946, L35, 10.3847/2041-8213/acbf50

    2023 doi

  109. [117]

    2018, , 867, 150, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae68c

    Morishita , T., Trenti , M., Stiavelli , M., et al. 2018, , 867, 150, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae68c

    2018 doi

  110. [118]

    2020, , 904, 50, 10.3847/1538-4357/abba83

    Morishita , T., Stiavelli , M., Trenti , M., et al. 2020, , 904, 50, 10.3847/1538-4357/abba83

    2020 doi

  111. [119]

    2023, , 947, L24, 10.3847/2041-8213/acb99e

    Morishita , T., Roberts-Borsani , G., Treu , T., et al. 2023, , 947, L24, 10.3847/2041-8213/acb99e

    2023 doi

  112. [120]

    2024 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.10980, 10.48550/arXiv.2408.10980

    Morishita , T., Liu , Z., Stiavelli , M., et al. 2024 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.10980, 10.48550/arXiv.2408.10980

    2024 doi arXiv

  113. [121]

    2024 b , , 963, 9, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1404

    Morishita , T., Stiavelli , M., Chary , R.-R., et al. 2024 b , , 963, 9, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1404

    2024 doi

  114. [122]

    P., Oesch , P

    Naidu , R. P., Oesch , P. A., Dokkum , P. v., et al. 2022, , 940, L14, 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b22

    2022 doi

  115. [123]

    2024, Scientific Reports, 14, 3724, 10.1038/s41598-024-52585-4

    Nanayakkara , T., Glazebrook , K., Jacobs , C., et al. 2024, Scientific Reports, 14, 3724, 10.1038/s41598-024-52585-4

    2024 doi

  116. [124]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.10967, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.10967

    Napolitano , L., Castellano , M., Pentericci , L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.10967, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.10967

    2024 doi arXiv

  117. [125]

    B., Ellis , R

    Newman , A. B., Ellis , R. S., Andreon , S., et al. 2014, , 788, 51, 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/51

    2014 doi

  118. [126]

    J., et al

    Nonino , M., Glazebrook , K., Burgasser , A. J., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2207.14802. 2207.14802

    2022 arXiv

  119. [127]

    A., Bouwens , R

    Oesch , P. A., Bouwens , R. J., Illingworth , G. D., Labb \'e , I., & Stefanon , M. 2018, , 855, 105, 10.3847/1538-4357/aab03f

    2018 doi

  120. [128]

    A., Bouwens , R

    Oesch , P. A., Bouwens , R. J., Illingworth , G. D., et al. 2010, , 709, L16, 10.1088/2041-8205/709/1/L16

    2010 doi

  121. [129]

    2013, , 773, 75, 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/75

    ---. 2013, , 773, 75, 10.1088/0004-637X/773/1/75

    2013 doi

  122. [130]

    B., & Gunn , J

    Oke , J. B., & Gunn , J. E. 1983, , 266, 713, 10.1086/160817

    1983 doi

  123. [131]

    2023, , 942, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/aca9d3

    Onoue , M., Inayoshi , K., Ding , X., et al. 2023, , 942, L17, 10.3847/2041-8213/aca9d3

    2023 doi

  124. [132]

    T., Toomey , D

    Rayner , J. T., Toomey , D. W., Onaka , P. M., et al. 2003, , 115, 362, 10.1086/367745

    2003 doi

  125. [133]

    Ren , K., Trenti , M., & Mason , C. A. 2019, , 878, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2117

    2019 doi

  126. [134]

    2022, , 927, 236, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4803

    Roberts-Borsani , G., Morishita , T., Treu , T., Leethochawalit , N., & Trenti , M. 2022, , 927, 236, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4803

    2022 doi

  127. [135]

    2024 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.17551, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.17551

    Roberts-Borsani , G., Bagley , M., Rojas-Ruiz , S., et al. 2024 a , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.17551, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.17551

    2024 doi arXiv

  128. [136]

    2024 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.07103, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.07103

    Roberts-Borsani , G., Treu , T., Shapley , A., et al. 2024 b , arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.07103, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.07103

    2024 doi arXiv

  129. [137]

    W., Bouwens , R

    Roberts-Borsani , G. W., Bouwens , R. J., Oesch , P. A., et al. 2016, , 823, 143, 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/143

    2016 doi

  130. [138]

    D., Tacchella , S., et al

    Robertson , B., Johnson , B. D., Tacchella , S., et al. 2024, , 970, 31, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad463d

    2024 doi

  131. [139]

    Robertson , B. E. 2010, , 716, L229, 10.1088/2041-8205/716/2/L229

    2010 doi

  132. [140]

    L., Bagley , M

    Rojas-Ruiz , S., Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M. B., et al. 2020, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2002.06209. 2002.06209

    2020 arXiv

  133. [141]

    B., Roberts-Borsani , G., et al

    Rojas-Ruiz , S., Bagley , M. B., Roberts-Borsani , G., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.00843, 10.48550/arXiv.2408.00843

    2024 doi

  134. [142]

    E., Thorman , P

    Ryan , R. E., Thorman , P. A., Yan , H., et al. 2011, , 739, 83, 10.1088/0004-637X/739/2/83

    2011 doi

  135. [143]

    1976, , 203, 297, 10.1086/154079

    Schechter , P. 1976, , 203, 297, 10.1086/154079

    1976 doi

  136. [144]

    F., & Finkbeiner , D

    Schlafly , E. F., & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, , 737, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  137. [145]

    J., Finkbeiner , D

    Schlegel , D. J., Finkbeiner , D. P., & Davis , M. 1998, , 500, 525, 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  138. [146]

    B., Treu , T., Brammer , G

    Schmidt , K. B., Treu , T., Brammer , G. B., et al. 2014, , 782, L36, 10.1088/2041-8205/782/2/L36

    2014 doi

  139. [147]

    C., Burgasser , A

    Schneider , A. C., Burgasser , A. J., Gerasimov , R., et al. 2020, , 898, 77, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9a40

    2020 doi

  140. [148]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.09142, 10.48550/arXiv.2306.09142

    Scholtz , J., Witten , C., Laporte , N., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2306.09142, 10.48550/arXiv.2306.09142

    2023 doi arXiv

  141. [149]

    2018, , 611, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731917

    Schreiber , C., Labb \'e , I., Glazebrook , K., et al. 2018, , 611, A22, 10.1051/0004-6361/201731917

    2018 doi

  142. [150]

    J., Verrico , M., Bezanson , R., et al

    Setton , D. J., Verrico , M., Bezanson , R., et al. 2022, , 931, 51, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac6096

    2022 doi

  143. [151]

    S., Lee , K., Ferguson , H

    Somerville , R. S., Lee , K., Ferguson , H. C., et al. 2004, , 600, L171, 10.1086/378628

    2004 doi

  144. [152]

    P., Ellis , R

    Stark , D. P., Ellis , R. S., Charlot , S., et al. 2017, , 464, 469, 10.1093/mnras/stw2233

    2017 doi

  145. [153]

    J., et al

    Stefanon , M., Labb \'e , I., Bouwens , R. J., et al. 2019, , 883, 99, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3792

    2019 doi

  146. [154]

    C., Adelberger , K

    Steidel , C. C., Adelberger , K. L., Dickinson , M., et al. 1998, , 492, 428, 10.1086/305073

    1998 doi

  147. [155]

    J., & Johnson , B

    Tacchella , S., Bose , S., Conroy , C., Eisenstein , D. J., & Johnson , B. D. 2018, , 868, 92, 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e0

    2018 doi

  148. [156]

    J., Hainline , K., et al

    Tacchella , S., Eisenstein , D. J., Hainline , K., et al. 2023, , 952, 74, 10.3847/1538-4357/acdbc6

    2023 doi

  149. [157]

    2019, , 885, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4ff3

    Tanaka , M., Valentino , F., Toft , S., et al. 2019, , 885, L34, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab4ff3

    2019 doi

  150. [158]

    2024, , 970, 59, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5316

    Tanaka , M., Onodera , M., Shimakawa , R., et al. 2024, , 970, 59, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5316

    2024 doi

  151. [159]

    P., Chen , Z., et al

    Tang , M., Stark , D. P., Chen , Z., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.07072, 10.48550/arXiv.2301.07072

    2023 doi arXiv

  152. [160]

    E., et al

    Tilvi , V., Malhotra , S., Rhoads , J. E., et al. 2020, , 891, L10, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab75ec

    2020 doi

  153. [161]

    C., & Furlanetto , S

    Trapp , A. C., & Furlanetto , S. R. 2020, , 499, 2401, 10.1093/mnras/staa2828

    2020 doi

  154. [162]

    C., Furlanetto , S

    Trapp , A. C., Furlanetto , S. R., & Davies , F. B. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2210.06504. 2210.06504

    2022 arXiv

  155. [163]

    2008, , 676, 767, 10.1086/528674

    Trenti , M., & Stiavelli , M. 2008, , 676, 767, 10.1086/528674

    2008 doi

  156. [164]

    D., Stiavelli , M., et al

    Trenti , M., Bradley , L. D., Stiavelli , M., et al. 2011, , 727, L39, 10.1088/2041-8205/727/2/L39

    2011 doi

  157. [165]

    2012, , 746, 55, 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/55

    ---. 2012, , 746, 55, 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/55

    2012 doi

  158. [166]

    B., Trenti , M., Bradley , L

    Treu , T., Schmidt , K. B., Trenti , M., Bradley , L. D., & Stiavelli , M. 2013, , 775, L29, 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L29

    2013 doi

  159. [167]

    2022, , 935, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8158

    Treu , T., Roberts-Borsani , G., Bradac , M., et al. 2022, , 935, 110, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8158

    2022 doi

  160. [168]

    2023, , 677, A145, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346137

    \"U bler , H., Maiolino , R., Curtis-Lake , E., et al. 2023, , 677, A145, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346137

    2023 doi

  161. [169]

    E., Daddi , E., et al

    Valentino , F., Magdis , G. E., Daddi , E., et al. 2020, , 890, 24, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6603

    2020 doi

  162. [170]

    Valentino , F., Brammer , G., Gould , K. M. L., et al. 2023, , 947, 20, 10.3847/1538-4357/acbefa

    2023 doi

  163. [171]

    van Dokkum , P. G. 2001, , 113, 1420, 10.1086/323894

    2001 doi

  164. [172]

    2012, in Conference on Intelligent Data Understanding (CIDU), 47 --54, 10.1109/CIDU.2012.6382200

    Vanderplas , J., Connolly , A., Ivezi \'c , Z ., & Gray , A. 2012, in Conference on Intelligent Data Understanding (CIDU), 47 --54, 10.1109/CIDU.2012.6382200

    2012

  165. [173]

    2017, , 836, 239, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5caf

    Vulcani , B., Trenti , M., Calvi , V., et al. 2017, , 836, 239, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5caf

    2017 doi

  166. [174]

    2023, , 948, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/accbc4

    Vulcani , B., Treu , T., Calabr \`o , A., et al. 2023, , 948, L15, 10.3847/2041-8213/accbc4

    2023 doi

  167. [175]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.02399, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.02399

    Wang , T., Sun , H., Zhou , L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.02399, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.02399

    2024 doi arXiv

  168. [176]

    R., Davidzon , I., Toft , S., et al

    Weaver , J. R., Davidzon , I., Toft , S., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.02512. 2212.02512

    2022 arXiv

  169. [177]

    J., et al

    Weibel , A., de Graaff , A., Setton , D. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.03829, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.03829

    2024 doi arXiv

  170. [178]

    P., et al

    Whitler , L., Endsley , R., Stark , D. P., et al. 2023, , 519, 157, 10.1093/mnras/stac3535

    2023 doi

  171. [179]

    M., Vijayan , A

    Wilkins , S. M., Vijayan , A. P., Lovell , C. C., et al. 2022, , 10.1093/mnras/stac3280

    2022 doi

  172. [180]

    C., Curtis-Lake , E., Hainline , K

    Williams , C. C., Curtis-Lake , E., Hainline , K. N., et al. 2018, , 236, 33, 10.3847/1538-4365/aabcbb

    2018 doi

  173. [181]

    C., Oesch , P

    Williams , C. C., Oesch , P. A., Weibel , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.01875, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.01875

    2024 doi arXiv

  174. [182]

    J., Quadri , R

    Williams , R. J., Quadri , R. F., Franx , M., van Dokkum , P., & Labb \'e , I. 2009, , 691, 1879, 10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/1879

    2009 doi

  175. [183]

    J., Desprez , G., Asada , Y., et al

    Willott , C. J., Desprez , G., Asada , Y., et al. 2024, , 966, 74, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad35bc

    2024 doi

  176. [184]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07937, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.07937

    Witten , C., McClymont , W., Laporte , N., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07937, 10.48550/arXiv.2407.07937

    2024 doi arXiv

  177. [185]

    A., et al

    Yan , H., Yan , L., Zamojski , M. A., et al. 2011, , 728, L22, 10.1088/2041-8205/728/1/L22

    2011 doi

  178. [186]

    Yung , L. Y. A., Somerville , R. S., Finkelstein , S. L., Popping , G., & Dav \'e , R. 2018, ArXiv e-prints. 1803.09761

    2018 arXiv

  179. [187]

    Zhang , Z., Jiang , L., Liu , W., & Ho , L. C. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.02729, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.02729

    2024 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.