pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28018 · v1 · pith:LIZCDWMWnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn

Effects of thermochemical modelling on a hypersonic shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction

Marco Fratini , Pedro Stefanin Volpiani , Matteo Bernardini This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 02:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn
keywords hypersonic flowshock-wave boundary-layer interactionthermochemical non-equilibriumfinite-rate chemistrydirect numerical simulationturbulent boundary layerseparation bubblehigh-enthalpy flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

Finite-rate chemistry produces a smaller separation bubble and lower wall heat flux than frozen models in a Mach 6.4 turbulent shock interaction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that thermochemical non-equilibrium alters the structure of a hypersonic shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction through three direct numerical simulations that share identical geometry and freestream conditions. A finite-rate reactive model is compared against single-species thermally perfect and calorically perfect models at edge Mach number 6.4 and stagnation enthalpy 16.9 MJ/kg. The reactive case shows that shock heating drives chemical activity with composition lagging the thermal response and turbulent Damkohler numbers reaching order unity inside the recirculation region. Thermally and calorically perfect models give similar results while finite-rate chemistry yields systematic differences including smaller separation, reduced post-interaction heat flux, lower temperatures, and a less inclined reflected shock.

Core claim

The reactive simulation shows that the shock-induced temperature rise substantially enhances chemical activity relative to the incoming boundary layer, with peak concentrations of dissociation products attained downstream of the interaction. Thus, the thermal and chemical responses are not synchronised: the composition lags the rapid thermal forcing imposed by the shock system, and turbulent Damkohler numbers reach values of order unity within the recirculation region, indicating non-negligible turbulence-chemistry interaction. The comparison among the three models shows that thermally and calorically perfect descriptions yield similar predictions, whereas finite-rate chemistry produces syst

What carries the argument

Hierarchy of three thermochemical models (finite-rate reactive, thermally perfect, calorically perfect) applied to identical oblique-shock/turbulent-boundary-layer configurations to isolate chemistry effects.

If this is right

  • The shock-induced temperature rise substantially enhances chemical activity relative to the incoming boundary layer.
  • Peak concentrations of dissociation products are attained downstream of the interaction.
  • Thermally and calorically perfect descriptions yield similar predictions.
  • Caloric-model effects play only a secondary role compared with the frozen versus reacting distinction.
  • Turbulent Damkohler numbers reach order unity inside the recirculation region.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The lag between thermal and chemical response could require time-accurate chemistry models rather than equilibrium assumptions in regions of strong unsteadiness.
  • Reduced heat flux under finite-rate chemistry might lower the required thermal-protection mass for vehicles operating near these conditions.
  • The secondary role of caloric perfection suggests that simpler frozen models remain usable if chemical reactions are omitted entirely.
  • Similar simulations at higher enthalpies could test whether the dominance of finite-rate effects strengthens or saturates.

Load-bearing premise

The three simulations share identical geometry and freestream conditions so that observed differences can be attributed solely to the choice of thermochemical model.

What would settle it

An additional simulation or experiment at the same Mach 6.4 and enthalpy conditions that measures the size of the separation bubble and post-interaction wall heat flux under finite-rate chemistry versus a frozen model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28018 by Marco Fratini, Matteo Bernardini, Pedro Stefanin Volpiani.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sketch of the physical configuration under analysis. 𝑀𝑒 𝛾𝑒 𝑇𝑒 [K] 𝜌𝑒 [kg/m3 ] 𝑝𝑒 [Pa] 𝐻𝑒 [MJ/kg] 𝑌N2 𝑌O2 𝑌NO 𝑌O 𝑌N 6.385 1.297 1967.5 0.135 76469.8 16.9 0.76363 0.22901 0.00721 0.00015 0.0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Streamwise evolution of the viscous-scaled grid spacings 𝛥𝑥+ , 𝛥𝑧+ , and 𝛥𝑦+ 𝑤 for the reactive case. Case 𝛿/𝛿0 𝑅𝑒𝜏 𝑅𝑒 𝜃 𝑅𝑒 𝛿2 𝑅𝑒∗ 𝜏 𝛩 𝑀𝜏 𝐶𝑓 × 103 −𝐵𝑞 SBLI-R 16.2 972 3335 2604 1550 0.17 0.171 1.45 0.10 SBLI-TP 15.4 983 3171 2590 1459 0.09 0.170 1.40 0.15 SBLI-CP 15.4 990 3161 2583 1470 0.09 0.168 1.40 0.15 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Streamwise evolution of the skin-friction coefficient (left panel) and of the incompressible shape factor (right panel) as a function of the momentum thickness Reynolds number. The solid gray line of panel (a) denotes the correlation 𝐶𝑓 = 0.0131𝑅𝑒−0.268 𝜃 from Ceci et al. (2022) and the dashed gray lines the ±2% uncertainty band. The dashed red lines mark the station at which wall normal profiles are extra… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Validation of the turbulent boundary-layer statistics against literature data. Left panel: Hasan￾transformed mean velocity profile. Right panel: density-scaled Reynolds-stress components. The solid line denotes the present reactive simulation; symbols denote reference data from Schlatter & Orl¨u ¨ (2012) (red circles), Cogo et al. (2023) (green diamonds), and Williams et al. (2025) (blue triangles). chemic… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Instantaneous three-dimensional visualisation of the simulation. Light gray: isosurface of the shock sensor revealing the position of both the impinging and the reflected shocks. Isosurfaces of the swirling strength are coloured by (top panel) the atomic oxygen mass fraction with range 0 ≤ 𝑌O ≤ 0.15, and (bottom panel) streamwise velocity with range 0 ≤ 𝑢/𝑢𝑒 ≤ 1. by incipient flow separation. Despite the h… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mean and instantaneous 𝑥−𝑦 slices of the reactive simulation. (a-b) Density gradient in the 𝑦 direction, (c-d) streamwise velocity, (e-f) temperature, and (g-h) atomic oxygen mass fraction. consequence of the relatively weak slope of both the impinging and reflected shocks, which is a distinctive feature of the present hypersonic configuration. In particular, the impinging shock has an angle 𝜑 = 14.9 ◦ , w… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Instantaneous slices at the wall of the reactive simulation. (a) skin friction coefficient, and (b) wall heat flux coefficient. (a) 100 101 102 103 104 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Wall-normal profiles of (a) Favre-averaged temperature and (b) temperature fluctuations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Wall-normal profiles of the Favre-averaged (left column) and root-mean-square (right column) species mass fractions at ˆ𝑥 = −4, −1.1, and 4 for (a,b) O2, (c,d) O, and (e,f) NO. The wall-normal coordinate is expressed in semi-local units. induced by the shock. Downstream of the interaction, fluctuation levels decrease, consistent with the reduced gradients associated with the broadened thermal profile. The … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Streamwise distribution of species mass fraction at the wall for N2, O2, O, and NO. The light gray shaded region indicates the separation bubble. formed through the forward shuffle reaction (R4) and the backward shuffle reaction (R5) (Zel’Dovich mechanism). Molecular nitrogen is not shown due to its weak participation in chemical kinetics, the same applies to atomic nitrogen, which is mildly produced near… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Streamwise distribution of the (a) convective and (b) turbulent Damkohler numbers for all species. ¨ The light gray shaded region indicates the separation bubble [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Mean 𝑥 − 𝑦 slice of the normalised heat release rate ¯𝜔¤ ★ ℎ = ¯𝜔¤ ℎ 𝛿imp/(𝜌𝑒𝑢𝑒𝐻𝑒), where ¯𝜔¤ ℎ = − Í𝑁𝑠 𝑛=1 𝜔¤ 𝑛𝛥ℎ𝑇ref 𝑓 ,𝑛. max𝑦 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Streamwise distribution of the spanwise-averaged premultiplied wall-pressure spectrum, 𝑓 𝛷𝑝 𝑝 ( 𝑓 ). The Strouhal number is defined as 𝑆𝑡 = 𝑓 𝛿imp/𝑢𝑒. Case ˆ𝑥sep 𝑥ˆreatt 𝐿sep/𝛿imp 𝜑imp 𝜑refl SBLI-R −1.226 −0.992 0.233 14.9 ◦ 8.27◦ SBLI-TP −1.293 −1.009 0.284 14.9 ◦ 8.49◦ SBLI-CP −1.341 −1.034 0.307 14.9 ◦ 8.49◦ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Streamwise distribution of wall quantities for the reactive (SBLI-R), thermally perfect (SBLI-TP), and calorically perfect (CP) simulations. (a) skin-friction coefficient, (b) wall heat flux coefficient, (c) wall pressure scaled with the edge value, and (d) root-mean-square of wall pressure fluctuations. The inset in panel (a) provides a magnified view of the interaction region. The dashed gray line in pa… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Wall-normal profiles of Favre-averaged temperature (left column) and root-mean-square temperature fluctuations (right column) for the reactive (SBLI-R), thermally perfect (SBLI-TP), and calorically perfect (SBLI-CP) simulations. Panels (a,b), (c,d), and (e,f) correspond to the stations ˆ𝑥 = −4, −1.1, and 4, respectively. level of the reactive boundary layer naturally results in a weaker heat-transfer resp… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Wall-normal profiles of the density-scaled streamwise Reynolds stress for the reactive (SBLI-R), thermally perfect (SBLI-TP), and calorically perfect (SBLI-CP) simulations at (a) ˆ𝑥 = −4 and (b) ˆ𝑥 = 4. The effect of chemistry is also visible in the wall-pressure distribution, reported in figure 14(c). All cases exhibit the typical signature of a weak interaction, with a first rise associated with the sep… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Thermochemical non-equilibrium can alter the structure, loads, and time scales of hypersonic shock-wave/turbulent boundary-layer interactions, yet its role in fully turbulent configurations remains largely unquantified. The present work addresses this issue by performing three direct numerical simulations of an oblique shock impinging on a turbulent high-enthalpy boundary layer at edge Mach number $M_e=6.4$ and stagnation enthalpy $H_e=16.9$ MJ/kg. The simulations share identical geometry and freestream conditions, but employ a hierarchy of progressively simplified thermochemical descriptions: a finite-rate reactive case, a single-species thermally perfect gas model, and a single-species calorically perfect model. The reactive simulation shows that the shock-induced temperature rise substantially enhances chemical activity relative to the incoming boundary layer, with peak concentrations of dissociation products attained downstream of the interaction. Thus, the thermal and chemical responses are not synchronised: the composition lags the rapid thermal forcing imposed by the shock system, and turbulent Damk\"ohler numbers reach values of order unity within the recirculation region, indicating non-negligible turbulence-chemistry interaction. The comparison among the three models shows that thermally and calorically perfect descriptions yield similar predictions, whereas finite-rate chemistry produces systematic differences: a smaller separation bubble, lower post-interaction wall heat flux, lower mean and fluctuating temperatures, and a less inclined reflected shock. In the present regime, the dominant modelling distinction is therefore between frozen and chemically reacting descriptions, with caloric-model effects playing only a secondary role.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs three direct numerical simulations of an oblique shock impinging on a high-enthalpy turbulent boundary layer (Me=6.4, He=16.9 MJ/kg) that share identical geometry and freestream conditions. The simulations employ a hierarchy of thermochemical models: finite-rate multi-species chemistry, single-species thermally perfect gas, and single-species calorically perfect gas. The central claim is that finite-rate chemistry produces systematic differences relative to the frozen cases (smaller separation bubble, lower post-interaction wall heat flux, lower mean and fluctuating temperatures, less inclined reflected shock), while the distinction between the two frozen models is secondary; turbulent Damköhler numbers of order unity are reported in the recirculation region.

Significance. If the attribution of differences to finite-rate chemistry holds after addressing the model hierarchy, the work supplies controlled numerical evidence that thermochemical non-equilibrium alters loads and structure in fully turbulent hypersonic interactions, a regime where such effects have been largely unquantified.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract (simulation hierarchy)] Abstract and description of simulation hierarchy: the claim that observed differences can be attributed to finite-rate chemistry versus frozen flow is undermined by the fact that the two frozen cases are single-species while the reacting case is multi-species. At He=16.9 MJ/kg the incoming boundary layer is expected to contain dissociated species; a single-species formulation cannot reproduce the correct mixture molecular weight, partial densities, or species-specific transport properties even under frozen composition. Consequently the reported systematic differences (smaller separation bubble, lower heat flux, etc.) may arise in part from single- versus multi-species formulation rather than the presence or absence of reactions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The major comment identifies a genuine limitation in our model hierarchy that affects the strength of our attribution claims. We address it point-by-point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and description of simulation hierarchy: the claim that observed differences can be attributed to finite-rate chemistry versus frozen flow is undermined by the fact that the two frozen cases are single-species while the reacting case is multi-species. At He=16.9 MJ/kg the incoming boundary layer is expected to contain dissociated species; a single-species formulation cannot reproduce the correct mixture molecular weight, partial densities, or species-specific transport properties even under frozen composition. Consequently the reported systematic differences (smaller separation bubble, lower heat flux, etc.) may arise in part from single- versus multi-species formulation rather than the presence or absence of reactions.

    Authors: We agree that the referee's observation is correct and that the present hierarchy does not fully isolate finite-rate chemistry from multi- versus single-species effects. The single-species frozen models were chosen because they represent standard engineering approximations, but this choice introduces a confounding variable, particularly given the expected dissociation in the incoming boundary layer at the stated enthalpy. In the revised manuscript we will (i) explicitly state this limitation in the abstract, introduction, and discussion sections, (ii) report the incoming boundary-layer species mass fractions from the multi-species simulation to quantify the degree of dissociation present, and (iii) qualify all claims regarding the source of the observed differences (smaller separation, lower heat flux, etc.) to note that they may arise from a combination of chemical activity and multi-species transport/molecular-weight effects. We will not add a new multi-species frozen simulation, as the computational cost of an additional DNS is prohibitive; the revision will therefore be textual and clarificatory rather than computational. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results from independent DNS comparisons under fixed conditions

full rationale

The paper reports three direct numerical simulations sharing identical geometry and freestream conditions but using different thermochemical models (finite-rate reactive, single-species thermally perfect, single-species calorically perfect). The central claims—smaller separation bubble, lower heat flux, lower temperatures, less inclined shock—are direct outputs of these separate computations, not quantities obtained by fitting parameters to data within the paper or by reducing equations to self-citations. No load-bearing step matches any of the enumerated circularity patterns; the model hierarchy is an explicit experimental design choice, not a self-definitional or fitted-input construction. The skeptic concern about single- versus multi-species formulation is a question of experimental validity, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The simulations rest on standard conservation laws for reacting flows and literature values for reaction rates; no new entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • chemical reaction rate coefficients
    Rates for dissociation and recombination are taken from external databases or prior literature and not derived within the paper.
axioms (2)
  • standard math The flow obeys the compressible Navier-Stokes equations augmented with species continuity and finite-rate chemistry source terms
    Invoked as the governing equations for all three simulations.
  • domain assumption The incoming boundary layer is fully developed, turbulent, and adequately resolved by the DNS grid
    Required for the comparison to isolate thermochemical effects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5815 in / 1296 out tokens · 77006 ms · 2026-06-29T02:30:29.985482+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , Della Posta, G

    Bernardini, M. , Della Posta, G. , Salvadore, F. & Martelli, E. 2023 a\/ Unsteadiness characterisation of shock wave/turbulent boundary-layer interaction at moderate R eynolds number . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 954 , A43

    2023

  2. [2]

    , Modesti, D

    Bernardini, M. , Modesti, D. , Salvadore, F. & Pirozzoli, S. 2021 STREA m S : A high-fidelity accelerated solver for direct numerical simulation of compressible turbulent flows . Computer Physics Communications 263 , 107906

    2021

  3. [3]

    , Modesti, D

    Bernardini, M. , Modesti, D. , Salvadore, F. , Sathyanarayana, S. , Della Posta, G. & Pirozzoli, S. 2023 b\/ STREA m S -2.0: Supersonic turbulent accelerated N avier- S tokes solver version 2.0 . Computer Physics Communications 285 , 108644

    2023

  4. [4]

    , Stewart, W.E

    Bird, R.B. , Stewart, W.E. & Lightfoot, E.N. 2006 Transport Phenomena\/ . Transport Phenomena\/ v. 1. Wiley

    2006

  5. [5]

    2019 Rate effects in hypersonic flows

    Candler, G.V. 2019 Rate effects in hypersonic flows . Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 51 (Volume 51, 2019), 379--402

    2019

  6. [6]

    , Palumbo, A

    Ceci, A. , Palumbo, A. , Larsson, J. & Pirozzoli, S. 2022 Numerical tripping of high-speed turbulent boundary layers . Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics 36 (6), 865--886

    2022

  7. [7]

    , Baù, U

    Cogo, M. , Baù, U. , Chinappi, M. , Bernardini, M. & Picano, F. 2023 Assessment of heat transfer and M ach number effects on high-speed turbulent boundary layers . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 974 , A10

    2023

  8. [8]

    & Urzay, J

    Di Renzo, M. & Urzay, J. 2021 Direct numerical simulation of a hypersonic transitional boundary layer at suborbital enthalpies . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 912 , A29

    2021

  9. [9]

    , Williams, C

    Di Renzo, M. , Williams, C. T. & Pirozzoli, S. 2024 Stagnation enthalpy effects on hypersonic turbulent compression corner flow at moderate R eynolds numbers . Phys. Rev. Fluids 9 , 033401

    2024

  10. [10]

    Dolling, D. S. 2001 Fifty years of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction research: What next? AIAA Journal 39 (8), 1517--1531

    2001

  11. [11]

    & Martín, M.P

    Duan, L. & Martín, M.P. 2009 Effect of finite-rate chemical reactions on turbulence in hypersonic turbulence boundary layers. In 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition\/ , p. 588

    2009

  12. [12]

    & Martín, M.P

    Duan, L. & Martín, M.P. 2011 Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. P art 4. effect of high enthalpy . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 684 , 25–59

    2011

  13. [13]

    , Ferrand, V

    Ducros, F. , Ferrand, V. , Nicoud, F. , Weber, C. , Darracq, D. , Gacherieu, C. & Poinsot, T. 1999 Large-Eddy Simulation of the Shock/Turbulence Interaction . Journal of Computational Physics 152 (2), 517--549

    1999

  14. [14]

    , Fratini, M

    Forti, E. , Fratini, M. , Bernardini, M. , Stella, F. , Valorani, M. & Ciottoli, P.P. 2025 Development and validation of a compressible multicomponent reactive flow solver based on STREA m S -2.0. In 11th European Conference For Aerospace Sciences (EUCASS), 2025 (Rome)\/

    2025

  15. [15]

    & Bernardini, M

    Fratini, M. & Bernardini, M. 2026 Wall-temperature effects in a turbulent hypersonic boundary layer in chemical non-equilibrium . Journal of Fluid Mechanics Under revision

    2026

  16. [16]

    2015 Progress in shock wave/boundary layer interactions

    Gaitonde, D.V. 2015 Progress in shock wave/boundary layer interactions . Progress in Aerospace Sciences 72 , 80--99 , celebrating 60 Years of the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR): A Review of Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics

    2015

  17. [17]

    , Sciacovelli, L

    Gibis, T. , Sciacovelli, L. , Kloker, M. & Wenzel, C. 2024 Heat-transfer effects in compressible turbulent boundary layers – a regime diagram . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 995 , A14

    2024

  18. [18]

    , Coleman, G.N

    Huang, P.G. , Coleman, G.N. & Bradshaw, P. 1995 Compressible turbulent channel flows: DNS results and modelling . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 305 , 185--218

    1995

  19. [19]

    & Candler, G

    Martín, M.P. & Candler, G. 2001 Temperature fluctuation scaling in reacting boundary layers. In 15th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference\/ , p. 2717

    2001

  20. [20]

    , Buttay, R

    Martínez Ferrer, P.J. , Buttay, R. , Lehnasch, G. & Mura, A. 2014 A detailed verification procedure for compressible reactive multicomponent N avier– S tokes solvers . Computers & Fluids 89 , 88--110

    2014

  21. [21]

    , Tondon, P.K

    Mathur, S. , Tondon, P.K. & Saxena, S.C. 1967 Thermal conductivity of binary, ternary and quaternary mixtures of rare gases . Molecular Physics 12 (6), 569--579

    1967

  22. [22]

    , Zehe, M.J

    McBride, B.J. , Zehe, M.J. & Gordon, S. 2002 NASA G lenn coefficients for calculating thermodynamic properties of individual species . Tech. Rep. 2002-211556. NASA

    2002

  23. [23]

    1990 Nonequilibrium Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics\/

    Park, C. 1990 Nonequilibrium Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics\/ . Wiley

    1990

  24. [24]

    , Sciacovelli, L

    Passiatore, D. , Sciacovelli, L. , Cinnella, P. & Pascazio, G. 2022 Thermochemical non-equilibrium effects in turbulent hypersonic boundary layers . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 941 , A21

    2022

  25. [25]

    , Sciacovelli, L

    Passiatore, D. , Sciacovelli, L. , Cinnella, P. & Pascazio, G. 2023 Shock impingement on a transitional hypersonic high-enthalpy boundary layer . Phys. Rev. Fluids 8 , 044601

    2023

  26. [26]

    & Veynante, D

    Poinsot, T. & Veynante, D. 2005 Theoretical and Numerical Combustion\/ . R.T. Edwards

    2005

  27. [27]

    & Bernardini, M

    Quadros, R. & Bernardini, M. 2018 Numerical investigation of transitional shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction in supersonic regime . AIAA Journal 56 (7), 2712--2724

    2018

  28. [28]

    , Parish, E

    Raje, P. , Parish, E. , Hickey, J.P. , Cinnella, P. & Duraisamy, K. 2025 Recent developments and research needs in turbulence modeling of hypersonic flows . Physics of Fluids 37 (3), 031304

    2025

  29. [29]

    , Bernardini, M

    Sathyanarayana, S. , Bernardini, M. , Modesti, D. , Pirozzoli, S. & Salvadore, F. 2025 High-speed turbulent flows towards the exascale: STREA m S -2 porting and performance . Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 196 , 104993

    2025

  30. [30]

    & Örlü, R

    Schlatter, P. & Örlü, R. 2012 Turbulent boundary layers at moderate R eynolds numbers: inflow length and tripping effects . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 710 , 5–34

    2012

  31. [31]

    , Passiatore, D

    Sciacovelli, L. , Passiatore, D. , Cinnella, P. & Pascazio, G. 2021 Assessment of a high-order shock-capturing central-difference scheme for hypersonic turbulent flow simulations . Computers & Fluids 230 , 105134

    2021

  32. [32]

    Volpiani, P. S. 2021 Numerical strategy to perform direct numerical simulations of hypersonic shock/boundary-layer interaction in chemical nonequilibrium . Shock Waves 31 , 361--378

    2021

  33. [33]

    Volpiani, P. S. , Bernardini, M. & Larsson, J. 2018 Effects of a nonadiabatic wall on supersonic shock/boundary-layer interactions . Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 , 083401

    2018

  34. [34]

    , Bernardini, Matteo & Larsson, Johan 2020 Effects of a nonadiabatic wall on hypersonic shock/boundary-layer interactions

    Volpiani, Pedro S. , Bernardini, Matteo & Larsson, Johan 2020 Effects of a nonadiabatic wall on hypersonic shock/boundary-layer interactions . Phys. Rev. Fluids 5 , 014602

    2020

  35. [35]

    Wilke, C. R. 1950 A viscosity equation for gas mixtures . The Journal of Chemical Physics 18 (4), 517--519

    1950

  36. [36]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1017 , A30

    Williams, Christopher Thomas , Di Renzo, Mario & Moin, Parviz 2025 Turbulence–chemistry interaction in a non-equilibrium hypersonic boundary layer . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1017 , A30

    2025

  37. [37]

    , Guo, T

    Zhang, J. , Guo, T. , Dang, G. & Li, X. 2024 Effects of wall temperature on hypersonic shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 990 , A21

    2024

  38. [38]

    and Williams, C

    Di Renzo, M. and Williams, C. T. and Pirozzoli, S. , journal =. Stagnation enthalpy effects on hypersonic turbulent compression corner flow at moderate. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.9.033401 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.9.033401 2024

  39. [39]

    Volpiani, P. S. , title =. Shock Waves , year =

  40. [40]

    Effects of a nonadiabatic wall on supersonic shock/boundary-layer interactions , author =. Phys. Rev. Fluids , volume =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.3.083401 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.3.083401 2018

  41. [41]

    Effects of a nonadiabatic wall on hypersonic shock/boundary-layer interactions , author =. Phys. Rev. Fluids , volume =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevFluids.5.014602 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevfluids.5.014602 2020

  42. [42]

    2005 , publisher=

    Theoretical and Numerical Combustion , author=. 2005 , publisher=

    2005

  43. [43]

    and Zehe, M.J

    McBride, B.J. and Zehe, M.J. and Gordon, S. , year =

  44. [44]

    2006 , publisher=

    Transport Phenomena , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  45. [45]

    Wilke, C. R. , title =. The Journal of Chemical Physics , volume =. 1950 , month =

    1950

  46. [46]

    Mathur and P.K

    S. Mathur and P.K. Tondon and S.C. Saxena , title =. Molecular Physics , volume =. 1967 , publisher =

    1967

  47. [47]

    1990 , publisher=

    Nonequilibrium Hypersonic Aerothermodynamics , author=. 1990 , publisher=

    1990

  48. [48]

    and Buttay, R

    Martínez Ferrer, P.J. and Buttay, R. and Lehnasch, G. and Mura, A. , keywords =. A detailed verification procedure for compressible reactive multicomponent. Computers & Fluids , volume =. 2014 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.10.014 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2013.10.014 2014

  49. [49]

    and Urzay, J

    Di Renzo, M. and Urzay, J. , year=. Direct numerical simulation of a hypersonic transitional boundary layer at suborbital enthalpies , volume=. doi:10.1017/jfm.2020.1144 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2020.1144 2020

  50. [50]

    and Di Renzo, M

    Urzay, J. and Di Renzo, M. , booktitle =. Engineering aspects of hypersonic turbulent flows at suborbital enthalpies , year =

  51. [51]

    and Passiatore, D

    Sciacovelli, L. and Passiatore, D. and Cinnella, P. and Pascazio, G. , keywords =. Assessment of a high-order shock-capturing central-difference scheme for hypersonic turbulent flow simulations , journal =. 2021 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105134 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2021.105134 2021

  52. [52]

    and Fratini, M

    Forti, E. and Fratini, M. and Bernardini, M. and Stella, F. and Valorani, M. and Ciottoli, P.P. , title =. 11th European Conference For Aerospace Sciences (EUCASS), 2025 (Rome) , year =

    2025

  53. [53]

    and Modesti, D

    Bernardini, M. and Modesti, D. and Salvadore, F. and Pirozzoli, S. , keywords =. Computer Physics Communications , volume =. 2021 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107906 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2021.107906 2021

  54. [54]

    and Modesti, D

    Bernardini, M. and Modesti, D. and Salvadore, F. and Sathyanarayana, S. and Della Posta, G. and Pirozzoli, S. , keywords =. Computer Physics Communications , volume =. 2023 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108644 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2022.108644 2023

  55. [55]

    and Bernardini, M

    Sathyanarayana, S. and Bernardini, M. and Modesti, D. and Pirozzoli, S. and Salvadore, F. , keywords =. High-speed turbulent flows towards the exascale:. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing , volume =. 2025 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2024.104993 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2024.104993 2025

  56. [56]

    and Bernardini, M

    Fratini, M. and Bernardini, M. , year=. Wall-temperature effects in a turbulent hypersonic boundary layer in chemical non-equilibrium , volume=. doi:, journal=

  57. [57]

    Journal of Computational Physics , volume =

    Efficient Implementation of Weighted. Journal of Computational Physics , volume =. 1996 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1996.0130 , url =

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph.1996.0130 1996

  58. [58]

    and Ferrand, V

    Ducros, F. and Ferrand, V. and Nicoud, F. and Weber, C. and Darracq, D. and Gacherieu, C. and Poinsot, T. , title = ". Journal of Computational Physics , year = 1999, month = jul, volume =. doi:10.1006/jcph.1999.6238 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1006/jcph.1999.6238 1999

  59. [59]

    and Capuano, F

    Coppola, G. and Capuano, F. and Pirozzoli, S. and de Luca, L. , title =. Journal of Computational Physics , volume =. 2019 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2019.01.007 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2019.01.007 2019

  60. [60]

    and Sandham, N.D

    Ala, T. and Sandham, N.D. , title =. AIAA SCITECH 2025 Forum , chapter =. 2025 , doi =

    2025

  61. [61]

    and Baù, U

    Cogo, M. and Baù, U. and Chinappi, M. and Bernardini, M. and Picano, F. , year=. Assessment of heat transfer and. doi:10.1017/jfm.2023.791 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2023.791 2023

  62. [62]

    and Sciacovelli, L

    Gibis, T. and Sciacovelli, L. and Kloker, M. and Wenzel, C. , year=. Heat-transfer effects in compressible turbulent boundary layers – a regime diagram , volume=. doi:10.1017/jfm.2024.622 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2024.622 2024

  63. [63]

    and Gibis, T

    Wenzel, C. and Gibis, T. and Kloker, M. , year=. About the influences of compressibility, heat transfer and pressure gradients in compressible turbulent boundary layers , volume=. doi:10.1017/jfm.2021.888 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2021.888 2021

  64. [64]

    and Martín, M.P

    Duan, L. and Martín, M.P. , year=. Direct numerical simulation of hypersonic turbulent boundary layers. doi:10.1017/jfm.2011.252 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2011.252 2011

  65. [65]

    and Örlü, R

    Schlatter, P. and Örlü, R. , year=. Turbulent boundary layers at moderate. doi:10.1017/jfm.2012.324 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2012.324 2012

  66. [66]

    and Bi, W.T

    Zhang, Y.S. and Bi, W.T. and Hussain, F. and She, Z.S. , year=. A generalized. doi:10.1017/jfm.2013.620 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2013.620 2013

  67. [67]

    Mécanique de la Turbulence , author=

    Effects of compressibility on turbulent flows , volume=. Mécanique de la Turbulence , author=. 1962 , pages=

    1962

  68. [68]

    Smits, A. J. and Matheson, N. and Joubert, P. N. , title =. Journal of Ship Research , volume =. 1983 , month =. doi:10.5957/jsr.1983.27.3.147 , url =

    work page doi:10.5957/jsr.1983.27.3.147 1983

  69. [69]

    1956 , publisher=

    The problem of aerodynamic heating , author=. 1956 , publisher=

    1956

  70. [70]

    2006 , publisher=

    Viscous fluid flow , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  71. [71]

    and Huang, Z

    Lu, R. and Huang, Z. , title =. Chinese Physics B , volume =. 2023 , doi =

    2023

  72. [72]

    and Hill, J.L

    Oddo, R. and Hill, J.L. and Reeder, M.F. and Chin, D. and Embrador, J. and Komives, J. and Tufts, M. and Borg, M. and Jewell, J.S. , title =. Experiments in Fluids , volume =

  73. [73]

    , title =

    Cary, A.M. , title =

  74. [74]

    4 , author=

    Handbuch der Experimentalphysik, vol. 4 , author=. Geest und Portig , year=

  75. [75]

    L’Aerotecnica , volume=

    Sulla trasmissione del calore da una lamina piana a un fluido scorrente ad alta velocita , author=. L’Aerotecnica , volume=

  76. [76]

    Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences , volume=

    Turbulent boundary layer in compressible fluids , author=. Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences , volume=

  77. [77]

    Boundary layers of flow and temperature , author=

  78. [78]

    and Sciacovelli, L

    Passiatore, D. and Sciacovelli, L. and Cinnella, P. and Pascazio, G. , year=. Thermochemical non-equilibrium effects in turbulent hypersonic boundary layers , volume=. doi:10.1017/jfm.2022.283 , journal=

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2022.283 2022

  79. [79]

    and Coleman, G.N

    Huang, P.G. and Coleman, G.N. and Bradshaw, P. , journal=. Compressible turbulent channel flows:. 1995 , publisher=

    1995

  80. [80]

    Physics of Fluids , volume=

    Mean velocity scaling for compressible wall turbulence with heat transfer , author=. Physics of Fluids , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

Showing first 80 references.