Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 149 references

Insights in Adaptation: Examining Self-reflection Strategies of Job Seekers with Visual Impairments in India

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that blind and visually impaired job seekers in India stay unemployed not mainly from lack of digital skills but from missing constructive feedback from peers and recruiters and from intervention tools that do not fit…

desk verdict First close look at how Indian BVI job seekers reflect on feedback; the core feedback-bottleneck claim is honestly limited by one-sided self-reports, but the paper is worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.22741 v1 pith:LOLRVDG3 submitted 2025-06-28 cs.HC

Akshay Nayak Kolgar , Yash Prakash , Sampath Jayarathna , Hae-Na Lee , Vikas Ashok This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords visualimpairmentjobseekingself-reflectionconstructivefeedbackaccessibilityIndiaemploymentinterventionsqualitativeinterviews
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Drawing on semi-structured interviews with 20 blind and visually impaired (BVI) job seekers in India, this paper tries to establish that the employment bottleneck for this group is no longer primarily access to digital literacy or assistive technology. The interviewees report that they train hard and gain confidence, yet repeatedly fail to meet industry expectations; they engage in self-reflection to find their shortcomings, but the feedback they need from peers and recruiters is absent or too generic to guide improvement. The paper also argues that existing job intervention tools are often inaccessible or one-size-fits-all, so they cannot support the collaborative, personalized self-reflection these job seekers require. If true, this reframes the problem from "giving job seekers more training" to "building a feedback loop among job seekers, mentors, recruiters, and adaptive tools," which has concrete design consequences.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the self-reflective feedback loop between the job seeker, peers, mentors, and recruiters. Self-reflection here is treated not as solitary introspection but as a socially mediated process in which candidates make sense of their strengths and gaps through the reactions of others, described in the paper through the "looking-glass self" idea, where social feedback acts as a mirror for professional identity. The analysis is structured by psychological models of self-regulated job search and planned behavior, which connect self-efficacy, perceived norms, and job-search intention to the narratives participants told; this framing is what lets the interview data carry the argument from individual experience to design recommendations for collaborative intervention systems.

What would settle it

Record the actual post-interview feedback recruiters give to BVI and sighted candidates in a sample of Indian IT hiring processes; if BVI candidates already receive specific, actionable feedback at rates comparable to sighted candidates, the paper's core claim of a missing feedback loop would be contradicted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The study's central claim is that BVI job seekers in India are caught in a feedback vacuum. Despite high self-efficacy and extensive training, they realize during job search that their skills do not match industry demands, yet they cannot close the gap because interviewers rarely give specific feedback, peers hesitate to criticize, and training centers teach isolated digital skills rather than collaborative workplace communication. Participants describe self-reflection as a social process: they revisit conversations with sighted peers, rehearse with friends, and draw on community stories of success, but these mirrors are imperfect. The paper concludes that existing employment intervention tools, such as resume builders, AI interview coaches, and mock interview recorders, are often incompatible with screen readers, or when accessible, give generic advice that ignores the disability-specific realities of interviews, such as needing to convince a recruiter that they can work independently.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on what 20 participants remembered and chose to say about their job searches, so if their memories are biased or if less-networked BVI job seekers have different experiences, the characterization of recruiter feedback and tool inadequacy could be wrong.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Job-intervention tools for BVI users need to be screen-reader compatible and give personalized, disability-aware feedback instead of generic tips like "maintain eye contact."
  • Self-reflection should be designed as a collaborative activity: peer networks, mentor guidance, and success stories already drive BVI job seekers' learning, so tools should amplify those social mirrors rather than replace them.
  • Training centers and digital literacy programs should add collaborative and communication skills, including working synchronously with sighted peers, virtual meeting behavior, and interview conversation, so job seekers are prepared for the industry's actual demands.
  • Recruiters and hiring systems should be brought into the feedback loop, since the absence of specific post-interview feedback leaves candidates unable to distinguish a skills gap from discrimination.
  • Accessible AI-driven mock interview platforms that record and analyze verbal responses could give BVI users unbiased, repeatable feedback, but only if the scenarios include disability-specific realities such as accessibility testing roles and screen-reader failures.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the missing feedback loop is the true bottleneck, then investments that only expand digital literacy or assistive technology access will not close the employment gap; the leverage point is structured, personalized feedback delivered through both tools and human networks.
  • The finding that participants perceived accessible AI feedback as "unbiased" suggests automated interview coaches could serve as a workaround for recruiter bias, but this is an untested extension since the same study found content mismatch and linguistic barriers that would need to be solved first.
  • The "self-reflection as social process" account likely generalizes beyond India to other Global South contexts and to other marginalized job seekers, though the specific recruiter skepticism and the weight of community narratives may differ where disability law is enforced differently.
  • A concrete testable extension would be to give one group of BVI job seekers a personalized-feedback intervention and compare their interview success rates with a control group receiving only generic training; improved outcomes would support the paper's causal reading.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a qualitative interview study of 20 blind and visually impaired (BVI) job seekers in India who were pursuing or had recently sought employment in the digital/IT industry. The authors use a hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis, organized by self-regulation theory and the theory of planned behavior, to examine how societal factors, peer interactions, and interview feedback shape self-reflection and career decision-making. Three main findings are presented: BVI job seekers begin with high self-efficacy but encounter a skills gap relative to industry demands; they rely on social and peer feedback for self-reflection but often receive vague or absent constructive feedback from recruiters; and existing job-intervention tools are insufficiently accessible and insufficiently tailored to BVI users. The paper concludes with design implications for future collaborative intervention systems that would provide personalized feedback. The authors explicitly acknowledge in Section 6.3 that the study relies on self-report data, did not capture interviewer perspectives, and did not obtain objective role requirements.

Significance. If its claims are accepted at the appropriate strength, the paper makes a useful empirical contribution to CSCW and accessibility research by extending job-search and self-reflection scholarship to the Global South, a context that has been comparatively underexplored. The study's strengths include a systematic hybrid thematic analysis, illustrative participant quotes, a clear positionality statement, and an unusually transparent limitations section that acknowledges the absence of recruiter perspectives and objective employment records. The paper also offers concrete, design-relevant suggestions (Table 2) for making interview-preparation tools more accessible and more responsive to the lived experiences of BVI job seekers. However, the paper's central causal framing—that the findings 'therefore' motivate feedback-oriented intervention tools—is stronger than the single-perspective, retrospective, self-report evidence can support. The manuscript is best viewed as a well-conducted qualitative exploration of perceived experiences and barriers, whose design implications should be framed as hypotheses for future triangulation with recruiter-side data and observational methods.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, §5.2, §6.3] The abstract's claim that BVI job seekers 'lack constructive feedback from peers and recruiters' and the resulting design implication—that future tools should supply personalized feedback—rest almost entirely on participants' retrospective accounts of interview interactions, as reported in §5.2 (especially the subsection 'Instinctive Reflection after Interviews and Job Rejections'). Section 6.3 explicitly concedes that the study 'did not capture the specific demands of the roles' and 'did not obtain the interviewers' perspectives.' This is load-bearing because the same quotes support competing explanations: P7 attributes rejection to bias while asserting that his skills match the role, whereas P12 attributes failures to communication-skills deficits. Without recruiter-side data or objective role requirements, the paper cannot distinguish a missing feedback loop from perceived discrimination or a genuine skills gap. The authors are appropriately cautious in §6.3, but the abstract's causal 'therefore' overstates what the evidence can establish. I recommend rephrasing the abstract and conclusion to report participants' perceptions (e.g., 'participants reported lacking constructive feedback') and framing the design implications as hypotheses to be tested in future work with recruiter interviews or direct observation of interviews.
  2. [§3.1, §6.3] The sample is recruited exclusively through training centers, snowball referrals, and active Facebook groups, and eligibility required a resume and an internet-capable device. This selection strategy systematically targets job seekers who already have formal training and digital access, which is consistent with the abstract's framing ('despite gaining digital literacy and extensive training') but limits the paper's ability to generalize to the broader BVI population in India, many of whom may have no training-center connection or digital-device access. Section 6.3 acknowledges that the study did not account for varying levels of technology familiarity, but this caveat appears only in the limitations subsection while the introduction and abstract make more general claims about 'BVI individuals.' Please narrow the scope statements or add a transferability analysis that specifies the population segments to which the themes are likely to apply.
  3. [§5.2, Table 2] The design strategy 'Seek Personalized Feedback for Skill Development' in Table 2 is presented as a direct consequence of the finding that 'BVI individuals often receive minimal feedback during interviews and are rejected with vague explanations.' Yet the data shown in §5.2 are largely about the perceived absence of feedback rather than the actual content or frequency of feedback given. Some participants (e.g., P4, P9, P19) describe meaningful peer and mentor feedback, which complicates the blanket claim of 'minimal feedback.' The design recommendations would be more persuasive if the paper explicitly separated 'feedback perceived as constructive by candidates' from 'feedback actually provided,' and discussed the conditions under which peer feedback was viewed as useful versus generic. This distinction is important because the proposed AI-based feedback tools are intended to compensate for a specific kind of absence, and the current phrasing conflates the two.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§3.2] The sentence 'The interview questionnaire were meticulously crafted' should be 'The interview questionnaire was meticulously crafted.'
  2. [Introduction] The sentence 'To answers these research questions' should be 'To answer these research questions.'
  3. [§5.1] The phrase 'sterotypical bias' should be 'stereotypical bias.'
  4. [§6.3] The word 'employbility' should be 'employability' in the final sentence of the limitations subsection.
  5. [Figure 1 and Table 2] Figure 1 is referenced only as 'illustrated in Figure 1' without a description of its structure; adding one sentence summarizing the thematic hierarchy would help readers who cannot extract the figure's layout from the surrounding text. In addition, the reference list includes an incomplete citation (reference [116], 'Fact Sheet. [n. d.]. Visual impairment and blindness'); the fuller citation should be provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the paper's claims are inductive summaries of interview data, with acknowledged limitations, and its self-citations carry no load-bearing weight.

full rationale

This is a qualitative interview study, not a derivation. The central findings—that BVI job seekers lack constructive feedback, that self-reflection is a social process, and that job intervention tools are not tailored to their needs—are presented as themes induced from 20 semi-structured interviews (Section 5), supported by participant quotations. The deductive use of Self-Regulation Theory and the Theory of Planned Behavior in Section 3.3 is an organizing lens applied after open coding; the paper explicitly states that no pre-existing codes were used and that codes were developed organically from the data. The analysis contains no equations, fitted parameters, or quantitative predictions, so no result reduces to its own inputs by construction. Self-citations such as references [81], [103]–[106], and [137] appear in related work and in design-feature suggestions, not as evidence for the empirical claims; the load-bearing evidence is the participant data. Section 6.3 explicitly acknowledges that interviewer perspectives and objective role requirements were not captured, which is a validity limitation rather than circular reasoning. Accordingly, no circular steps are identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The study is qualitative and theory-driven; it introduces no fitted parameters and no new entities. Its central claims rest on domain assumptions about the applicability of self-regulation and reflection frameworks and on the accuracy and representativeness of self-reported interview data.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Self-Regulation Theory and the Theory of Planned Behavior are appropriate theoretical lenses for coding job-search behavior.
    Section 3.3 states that deductive coding organized themes according to these frameworks; the validity of the thematic structure depends on these theories fitting the data.
  • domain assumption Participants' retrospective self-reports accurately reflect their job-search experiences and the feedback they received.
    The entire data set comes from semi-structured interviews (Section 3.2), and Section 6.3 acknowledges that interviewer perspectives and objective records were not captured.
  • domain assumption The sample of 20 participants recruited through training centers and Facebook groups represents the range of BVI job seekers in India.
    Section 3.1 describes recruitment through workforce programs, snowball sampling, and Facebook groups with more than 500 members, which likely misses BVI people without such networks.
  • domain assumption Schön's reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action framework is a valid basis for categorizing self-reflection in intervention tools.
    Section 2.1 builds its discussion of reflection tools on Schön's framework, which is used later to interpret tool adequacy.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Insights in Adaptation: Examining Self-reflection Strategies of Job Seekers with Visual Impairments in India." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LOLRVDG3

@misc{pith2026250622741,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Insights in Adaptation: Examining Self-reflection Strategies of Job Seekers with Visual Impairments in India},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LOLRVDG3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.22741}
}
read the original abstract

Significant changes in the digital employment landscape, driven by rapid technological advancements and the COVID-19 pandemic, have introduced new opportunities for blind and visually impaired (BVI) individuals in developing countries like India. However, a significant portion of the BVI population in India remains unemployed despite extensive accessibility advancements and job search interventions. Therefore, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 BVI persons who were either pursuing or recently sought employment in the digital industry. Our findings reveal that despite gaining digital literacy and extensive training, BVI individuals struggle to meet industry requirements for fulfilling job openings. While they engage in self-reflection to identify shortcomings in their approach and skills, they lack constructive feedback from peers and recruiters. Moreover, the numerous job intervention tools are limited in their ability to meet the unique needs of BVI job seekers. Our results therefore provide key insights that inform the design of future collaborative intervention systems that offer personalized feedback for BVI individuals, effectively guiding their self-reflection process and subsequent job search behaviors, and potentially leading to improved employment outcomes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.22741 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Key themes and sub-themes in self-reflection among BVI job seekers. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

149 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    William C Adams. 2015. Conducting semi-structured interviews. Handbook of practical program evaluation (2015), 492–505

    2015

  2. [2]

    Icek Ajzen. 2006. Behavioral interventions based on the theory of planned behavior. (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    Erdoğan Akari

    V. Erdoğan Akari. 2020. Visually Impaired Mentally Sighted: An Inclusive Education Case. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies 8, 4 (2020), 1–7. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1279630.pdf

    2020

  4. [4]

    Deniz Akdur. 2022. Analysis of software engineering skills gap in the industry. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 23, 1 (2022), 1–28

    2022

  5. [5]

    American Foundation for the Blind. 2023. Research and Initiatives. https://www.afb.org/research-and-initiatives

    2023

  6. [6]

    American India Foundation. 2015. Job Mapping for the Visually Impaired. https://aif.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/AIF-Job-Mapping-for-VI- Study_Dec-2015.pdf Accessed on November 21, 2024

    2015

  7. [7]

    Hugh TJ Bainbridge and Yuka Fujimoto. 2018. Job seekers with musculoskeletal or sensory disabilities: Barriers and facilitators of job search. British Journal of Management 29, 1 (2018), 82–98

    2018

  8. [8]

    Cem Başlevent and Hasan Kirmanoğlu. 2013. Do preferences for job attributes provide evidence of ‘Hierarchy of Needs’? Social indicators research 111 (2013), 549–560. 23 Conference acronym ’XX, June 03–05, 2018, Woodstock, NY Nayak, et al

    2013

Show all 149 references
  1. [9]

    Madhurenu Basu and K Sambath Rani. 2023. Barriers at Workplace: Challenges for Adults With Visual Impairments—A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 117, 4 (2023), 326–335

    2023

  2. [10]

    Katherine A Batterton and Kimberly N Hale. 2017. The Likert scale what it is and how to use it. Phalanx 50, 2 (2017), 32–39

    2017

  3. [11]

    Marit Bentvelzen, Paweł W Woźniak, Pia SF Herbes, Evropi Stefanidi, and Jasmin Niess. 2022. Revisiting reflection in hci: Four design resources for technologies that support reflection. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 1 (2...

    2022

  4. [12]

    Andrew BL Berry, Catherine Y Lim, Calvin A Liang, Andrea L Hartzler, Tad Hirsch, Dawn M Ferguson, Zoë A Bermet, and James D Ralston. 2021. Supporting collaborative reflection on personal values and health. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1–39

    2021

  5. [13]

    Gary Blau. 1994. Testing a two-dimensional measure of job search behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 59, 2 (1994), 288–312

    1994

  6. [14]

    Blind Welfare Society. 2023. Bridging the Divide: Employment Opportunities for the Visually Impaired in India. https://www.blindwelfaresociety. in/blogs/bridging-the-divide-employment-opportunities-for-the-visually-impaired-in-india

    2023

  7. [15]

    Blind Welfare Society. 2024. Bridging the Divide: Employment Opportunities for the Visually Impaired in India. https://www.blindwelfaresociety. in/blogs/bridging-the-divide-employment-opportunities-for-the-visually-impaired-in-india Accessed on November 21, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Ernst Bohlmeijer, Filip Smit, and Pim Cuijpers. 2003. Effects of reminiscence and life review on late-life depression: a meta-analysis. International journal of geriatric psychiatry 18, 12 (2003), 1088–1094

    2003

  9. [17]

    Fadi Botros, Charles Perin, Bon Adriel Aseniero, and Sheelagh Carpendale. 2016. Go and grow: Mapping personal data to a living plant. In Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces . 112–119

    2016

  10. [18]

    David Boud, Rosemary Keogh, and David Walker. 2013. Reflection: Turning experience into learning . Routledge

    2013

  11. [19]

    Rupert Bourne, Jaimie D Steinmetz, Seth Flaxman, Paul Svitil Briant, Hugh R Taylor, Serge Resnikoff, Robert James Casson, Amir Abdoli, Eman Abu-Gharbieh, Ashkan Afshin, et al. 2021. Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30 years: an ana...

    2021

  12. [20]

    LouAnne E Boyd, Alejandro Rangel, Helen Tomimbang, Andrea Conejo-Toledo, Kanika Patel, Monica Tentori, and Gillian R Hayes. 2016. SayWAT: Augmenting face-to-face conversations for adults with autism. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing syste...

    2016

  13. [21]

    Audun Brunes, Marianne B Hansen, and Trond Heir. 2021. General self-efficacy in individuals with visual impairment compared with the general population. PLoS One 16, 7 (2021), e0254043

    2021

  14. [22]

    Jeni L Burnette, Ernest H O’boyle, Eric M VanEpps, Jeffrey M Pollack, and Eli J Finkel. 2013. Mind-sets matter: a meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological bulletin 139, 3 (2013), 655

    2013

  15. [23]

    Matthew J Burton, Jacqueline Ramke, Ana Patricia Marques, Rupert RA Bourne, Nathan Congdon, Iain Jones, Brandon AM Ah Tong, Simon Arunga, Damodar Bachani, Covadonga Bascaran, et al. 2021. The Lancet global health Commission on global eye health: vision beyond 2020. The Lancet ...

    2021

  16. [24]

    Erik W Carter, Jessica M Awsumb, Michele A Schutz, and Elise D McMillan. 2021. Preparing youth for the world of work: Educator perspectives on pre-employment transition services. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals 44, 3 (2021), 161–173

    2021

  17. [25]

    Robert Cercós, William Goddard, Adam Nash, and Jeremy Yuille. 2016. Coupling quantified bodies: affective possibilities of self-quantification beyond the self. Digital Culture & Society 2, 1 (2016), 177–182

    2016

  18. [26]

    Yoonha Cha, Victoria Jackson, Isabela Figueira, Stacy Marie Branham, and André Van der Hoek. 2024. Understanding the Career Mobility of Blind and Low Vision Software Professionals. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE/ACM 17th International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspec...

    2024

  19. [27]

    Chia-Fang Chung, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Sonali Mishra, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2017. When personal tracking becomes social: Examining the use of Instagram for healthy eating. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on human factors in computing systems . ...

    2017

  20. [28]

    Cindi Boudreaux. 2023. Top Recommended AI Tools for Job Seekers. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/top-recommended-ai-tools-job-seekers- cindi-boudreaux/

    2023

  21. [29]

    PA Clarke. 2007. Reflective teaching model: A tool for motivation, collaboration, self-reflection, and innovation in learning. Georgia State University (2007)

    2007

  22. [30]

    Jennifer L Cmar and Anne Steverson. 2021. Job-Search Activities, Job-Seeking Barriers, and Work Experiences of Transition-Age Youths With Visual Impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 115, 6 (2021), 479–492

    2021

  23. [31]

    Charles Horton Cooley. 1902. The looking-glass self. The production of reality: Essays and readings on social interaction 6, 1902 (1902), 126–28

    1902

  24. [32]

    Peter A Creed, Vivien King, Michelle Hood, and Robert McKenzie. 2009. Goal orientation, self-regulation strategies, and job-seeking intensity in unemployed adults. Journal of Applied Psychology 94, 3 (2009), 806

    2009

  25. [33]

    Adele Crudden and Lynn W McBroom. 1999. Barriers to employment: A survey of employed persons who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 93, 6 (1999), 341–350

    1999

  26. [34]

    Adele Crudden, Lynn W McBroom, Amy L Skinner, and J Elton Moore. 1998. Comprehensive examination of barriers to employment among persons who are blind or visually impaired. (1998)

    1998

  27. [35]

    Serge P da Motta Veiga and Daniel B Turban. 2018. Insight into job search self-regulation: Effects of employment self-efficacy and perceived progress on job search intensity. Journal of Vocational Behavior 108 (2018), 57–66. 24 Insights in Adaptation: Examining Self-reflection...

    2018

  28. [36]

    It doesn’t win you friends

    Maitraye Das, Darren Gergle, and Anne Marie Piper. 2019. " It doesn’t win you friends" Understanding Accessibility in Collaborative Writing for People with Vision Impairments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1–26

    2019

  29. [37]

    Maitraye Das, John Tang, Kathryn E Ringland, and Anne Marie Piper. 2021. Towards accessible remote work: Understanding work-from-home practices of neurodivergent professionals. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1–30

    2021

  30. [38]

    Deloitte India. 2024. Deloitte Technology Trends 2024: India Perspective. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/in/Documents/ technology/in-technology-deloitte-tech-trends-2024-india-10.04-noexp.pdf

    2024

  31. [39]

    Ashwini Deshpande. 2023. Long-Term Impact of COVID-19 on the Indian Labour Market. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics 66, 4 (2023), 951–959

    2023

  32. [40]

    John Dewey. 2022. How we think. DigiCat

    2022

  33. [41]

    Tawanna R Dillahunt, Nishan Bose, Suleman Diwan, and Asha Chen-Phang. 2016. Designing for disadvantaged job seekers: Insights from early investigations. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems . 905–910

    2016

  34. [42]

    Tawanna R Dillahunt and Joey Chiao-Yin Hsiao. 2020. Positive feedback and self-reflection: features to support self-efficacy among underrepresented job seekers. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–13

    2020

  35. [43]

    Tawanna R Dillahunt and Joey Chiao-Yin Hsiao. 2021. Skillsidentifier: a tool to promote career identity and self-efficacy among underrepresented job seekers. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

    2021

  36. [44]

    Tawanna R Dillahunt, Vaishnav Kameswaran, Linfeng Li, and Tanya Rosenblat. 2017. Uncovering the values and constraints of real-time ridesharing for low-resource populations. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 2757–2769

    2017

  37. [45]

    Tawanna R Dillahunt, Jason Lam, Alex Lu, and Earnest Wheeler. 2018. Designing future employment applications for underserved job seekers: a speed dating study. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference . 33–44

    2018

  38. [46]

    Michael Eraut. 1995. Schon shock: a case for refraining reflection-in-action? Teachers and teaching 1, 1 (1995), 9–22

    1995

  39. [47]

    UK Commission for Employment and Skills (UKCES). 2015. High level STEM skills requirements in the UK labour market. UK Commission for Employment and Skills (2015)

    2015

  40. [48]

    Freedom Scientific. 2022. JAWS ® – Freedom Scientific. https://www.freedomscientific.com/products/software/jaws/

    2022

  41. [49]

    Adrian Furnham. 1983. Employment and unemployment: a social-psychological analysis: Marie Jahoda, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, 112 pages,[UK pound] 10.50 (hardback),[UK pound] 3.95 (paperback). Journal of Economic Psychology 4, 3 (1983), 291–293

    1983

  42. [50]

    Georgia Institute of Technology. 2023. Making Coding Education More Accessible for Blind and Visually Impaired Youth. https://research.gatech. edu/making-coding-education-more-accessible-blind-and-visually-impaired-youth

    2023

  43. [51]

    Jackie Gnepp, Joshua Klayman, Ian O Williamson, and Sema Barlas. 2020. The future of feedback: Motivating performance improvement through future-focused feedback. PloS one 15, 6 (2020), e0234444

    2020

  44. [52]

    Dawn B Golub. 2006. A model of successful work experience for employees who are visually impaired: The results of a study. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 100, 12 (2006), 715–725

    2006

  45. [53]

    Ravinder Goyal. 2023. Exploring India’s digital transformation: The growth of online jobs and its impact on the economy. https://timesofindia. indiatimes.com/blogs/voices/exploring-indias-digital-transformation-the-growth-of-online-jobs-and-its-impact-on-the-economy/

    2023

  46. [54]

    Mark S Granovetter. 1973. extend access to American Journal of Sociology. Amer. J. Sociology 78, 6 (1973), 1360–1380

    1973

  47. [55]

    William Grussenmeyer, Jesel Garcia, Eelke Folmer, and Fang Jiang. 2017. Evaluating the accessibility of the job search and interview process for people who are blind and visually impaired. In Proceedings of the 14th International Web for All Conference . 1–4

    2017

  48. [56]

    Guest. 2024. Digital skills: The new currency for employability in India’s digital age. https://www.financialexpress.com/business/industry-digital- skills-the-new-currency-for-employability-in-indias-digital-age-3475735/

    2024

  49. [57]

    Shikha Gupta, Mahadeo Sukhai, and Walter Wittich. 2021. Employment outcomes and experiences of people with seeing disability in Canada: An analysis of the Canadian Survey on Disability 2017. PLOS ONE 16, 11 (11 2021), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260160

    2021 doi

  50. [58]

    Corinna Hank and Christian Huber. 2024. Do Peers Influence the Development of Individuals’ Social Skills? The Potential of Cooperative Learning and Social Learning in Elementary Schools. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology (2024), 1–27

    2024

  51. [59]

    Gillian R Hayes, V Erick Custodio, Oliver L Haimson, Kathy Nguyen, Kathryn E Ringland, Rachel Rose Ulgado, Aaron Waterhouse, and Rachel Weiner. 2015. Mobile video modeling for employment interviews for individuals with autism. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation 43, 3 (2015), 275–287

    2015

  52. [60]

    David G Hendry, Norah Abokhodair, Rose Paquet Kinsley, and Jill Palzkill Woelfer. 2017. Homeless young people, jobs, and a future vision: Community members’ perceptions of the job co-op. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Communities and Technologies . 22–31

    2017

  53. [61]

    David G Hendry, Jill Palzkill Woelfer, and Thuy Duong. 2017. U-District Job Co-op: constructing a future vision for homeless young people and employment. Information Technology & People 30, 3 (2017), 602–628

    2017

  54. [62]

    Paul L Hewitt, A Marie Habke, Dayna L Lee-Baggley, Simon B Sherry, and Gordon L Flett. 2008. The impact of perfectionistic self-presentation on the cognitive, affective, and physiological experience of a clinical interview. Psychiatry 71, 2 (2008), 93–122

    2008

  55. [63]

    Nazanin M Heydarian, Yessenia Castro, and Osvaldo F Morera. 2022. A brief report examining the stereotype content model with blind Americans. Rehabilitation psychology 67, 2 (2022), 231

    2022

  56. [64]

    Lisbeth Højdal. 2020. Contemporary approaches to career counseling: Critical perspectives on the life-design paradigm.Nordic Journal of Transitions, Careers and Guidance 1, 1 (2020), 27–37. 25 Conference acronym ’XX, June 03–05, 2018, Woodstock, NY Nayak, et al

    2020

  57. [65]

    Siw Elisabeth Hove and Bente Anda. 2005. Experiences from conducting semi-structured interviews in empirical software engineering research. In 11th IEEE International Software Metrics Symposium (METRICS’05) . IEEE, 10–pp

    2005

  58. [66]

    Pablo Illanes, Susan Lund, Mona Mourshed, Scott Rutherford, and Magnus Tyreman. 2018. Retraining and Reskilling Workers in the Age of Automation. McKinsey & Company (2018). https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/retraining-and-reskilling-workers-in- the-age-...

    2018

  59. [67]

    International Trade Administration. 2024. India - Information and Communication Technology. https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial- guides/india-information-and-communication-technology

    2024

  60. [68]

    Hanna Kallio, Anna-Maija Pietilä, Martin Johnson, and Mari Kangasniemi. 2016. Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of advanced nursing 72, 12 (2016), 2954–2965

    2016

  61. [69]

    Vaishnav Kameswaran, Jatin Gupta, Joyojeet Pal, Sile O’Modhrain, Tiffany C Veinot, Robin Brewer, Aakanksha Parameshwar, and Jacki O’Neill

  62. [70]

    Vaishnav Kameswaran and Megh Marathe. 2023. Advocacy as Access Work: How People with Visual Impairments Gain Access to Digital Banking in India. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 7, CSCW1 (2023), 1–23

    2023

  63. [71]

    Ruth Kanfer, Connie R Wanberg, and Tracy M Kantrowitz. 2001. Job search and employment: A personality–motivational analysis and meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied psychology 86, 5 (2001), 837

    2001

  64. [72]

    Ryan Kelly, Daniel Gooch, Bhagyashree Patil, and Leon Watts. 2017. Demanding by design: Supporting effortful communication practices in close personal relationships. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing . 70–83

    2017

  65. [73]

    Kalpana Kharade and Hema Peese. 2012. Learning by E-learning for visually impaired students: Opportunities or again marginalisation? E-learning and Digital Media 9, 4 (2012), 439–448

    2012

  66. [74]

    Rafal Kocielnik, Daniel Avrahami, Jennifer Marlow, Di Lu, and Gary Hsieh. 2018. Designing for workplace reflection: a chat and voice-based conversational agent. In Proceedings of the 2018 designing interactive systems conference . 881–894

    2018

  67. [75]

    Felicia Kornbluh. 2021. How Blind Activists Fought for Blind Workers. JSTOR Daily (2021). https://daily.jstor.org/how-blind-activists-fought-for- blind-workers/

    2021

  68. [76]

    Pawan Kumar and Sunil Kumar. 2022. ICT and employment in India: An analysis of organized sector. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics 65, 2 (2022), 373–395

    2022

  69. [77]

    Christine Lackner and Tanya Martini. 2017. Helping University Students Succeed at Employment Interviews: The Role of Self-Reflection in E-Portfolios. Teaching & Learning Inquiry 5, 2 (2017), 3–15

    2017

  70. [78]

    Simone Lanette, Phoebe K Chua, Gillian Hayes, and Melissa Mazmanian. 2018. How much is’ too much’? The role of a smartphone addiction narrative in individuals’ experience of use. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–22

    2018

  71. [79]

    Maaike Langelaan, Michiel R De Boer, Ruth MA Van Nispen, Bill Wouters, Annette C Moll, and Ger HMB Van Rens. 2007. Impact of visual impairment on quality of life: a comparison with quality of life in the general population and with other chronic conditions.Ophthalmic epidemiol...

    2007

  72. [80]

    Jonathan Lazar, Abiodun Olalere, and Brian Wentz. 2012. Investigating the accessibility and usability of job application web sites for blind users. Journal of Usability Studies 7, 2 (2012), 68–87

    2012

  73. [81]

    Hae-Na Lee, Yash Prakash, Mohan Sunkara, IV Ramakrishnan, and Vikas Ashok. 2022. Enabling convenient online collaborative writing for low vision screen magnifier users. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media . 143–153

    2022

  74. [82]

    Magdeleine DN Lew and Henk G Schmidt. 2011. Self-reflection and academic performance: is there a relationship? Advances in Health Sciences Education 16 (2011), 529–545

    2011

  75. [83]

    Ling Li. 2022. Reskilling and upskilling the future-ready workforce for industry 4.0 and beyond. Information Systems Frontiers (2022), 1–16

    2022

  76. [84]

    Songqi Liu, Jason L Huang, and Mo Wang. 2014. Effectiveness of job search interventions: a meta-analytic review. Psychological bulletin 140, 4 (2014), 1009

    2014

  77. [85]

    Songqi Liu, Mo Wang, Hui Liao, and Junqi Shi. 2014. Self-regulation during job search: The opposing effects of employment self-efficacy and job search behavior self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology 99, 6 (2014), 1159

    2014

  78. [86]

    Lornadale L. Charles. 2023. The Importance of Providing Feedback to Interviewees: A Call for Professionalism in Hiring. https://www.linkedin. com/pulse/importance-providing-feedback-interviewees-call-hiring-charles/

    2023

  79. [87]

    Because Some Sighted People, They Don’t Know What the Heck You’re Talking About:

    Yao Lyu and John M Carroll. 2024. " Because Some Sighted People, They Don’t Know What the Heck You’re Talking About:" A Study of Blind Tokers’ Infrastructuring Work to Build Independence. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8, CSCW1 (2024), 1–30

    2024

  80. [88]

    Karen Mann, Jill Gordon, and Anna MacLeod. 2009. Reflection and reflective practice in health professions education: a systematic review.Advances in health sciences education 14 (2009), 595–621

    2009

  81. [89]

    Abraham Maslow and Karen J Lewis. 1987. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Salenger Incorporated 14, 17 (1987), 987–990

    1987

  82. [90]

    Microsoft Corporation. 2024. Microsoft Teams Documentation. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/

    2024

  83. [91]

    Marius Mikalsen and Eric Monteiro. 2018. Data handling in knowledge infrastructures: A case study from oil exploration. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–16

    2018

  84. [92]

    Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, Government of India. 2024. Digital India. https://www.digitalindia.gov.in/

    2024

  85. [93]

    Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, Government of India. 2024. Skill India Digital Hub. https://www.skillindiadigital.gov.in/home 26 Insights in Adaptation: Examining Self-reflection Strategies of Job Seekers with Visual Impairments in India Conference acronym ...

    2024

  86. [94]

    Stefania M Mojon-Azzi, Alfonso Sousa-Poza, and Daniel S Mojon. 2010. Impact of low vision on employment. Ophthalmologica 224, 6 (2010), 381–388

    2010

  87. [95]

    Ine Mols, Elise Van Den Hoven, and Berry Eggen. 2016. Technologies for everyday life reflection: Illustrating a design space. In Proceedings of the TEI’16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction . 53–61

    2016

  88. [96]

    SV Nagarajan and Jenny Edwards. 2008. Towards understanding the non-technical work experiences of recent Australian information technology graduates. In Australasian Conference on Computer Science Education . Australian Computer Society

    2008

  89. [97]

    National Association for the Blind, India. 2024. National Association for the Blind, India. https://nabindia.org.in/

    2024

  90. [98]

    Gera Noordzij, Edwin AJ van Hooft, Heleen van Mierlo, Arjan van Dam, and Marise Ph Born. 2013. The effects of a learning-goal orientation training on self-regulation: A field experiment among unemployed job seekers. Personnel Psychology 66, 3 (2013), 723–755

    2013

  91. [99]

    NV Access. 2022. NV Access. https://www.nvaccess.org/

    2022

  92. [100]

    Joyojeet Pal. 2014. Technology changing lives for visually impaired people in developing countries. https://news.umich.edu/technology-changing- lives-for-visually-impaired-people-in-developing-countries/

    2014

  93. [101]

    Joyojeet Pal and Meera Lakshmanan. 2012. Assistive technology and the employment of people with vision impairments in India. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development . 307–317

    2012

  94. [102]

    Cindy Passmore, Alison E Dobbie, Michael Parchman, and James Tysinger. 2002. Guidelines for constructing a survey.FAMILY MEDICINE-KANSAS CITY- 34, 4 (2002), 281–286

    2002

  95. [103]

    Yash Prakash, Pathan Aseef Khan, Akshay Kolgar Nayak, Sampath Jayarathna, Hae-Na Lee, and Vikas Ashok. 2024. Towards Enhancing Low Vision Usability of Data Charts on Smartphones. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2024)

    2024

  96. [104]

    Yash Prakash, Akshay Kolgar Nayak, Shoaib Mohammed Alyaan, Pathan Aseef Khan, Hae-Na Lee, and Vikas Ashok. 2024. Improving Usability of Data Charts in Multimodal Documents for Low Vision Users. InProceedings of the 26th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction . 498–507

    2024

  97. [105]

    Yash Prakash, Akshay Kolgar Nayak, Mohan Sunkara, Sampath Jayarathna, Hae-Na Lee, and Vikas Ashok. 2024. All in One Place: Ensuring Usable Access to Online Shopping Items for Blind Users. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8, EICS (2024), 1–25

    2024

  98. [106]

    Yash Prakash, Mohan Sunkara, Hae-Na Lee, Sampath Jayarathna, and Vikas Ashok. 2023. AutoDesc: Facilitating Convenient Perusal of Web Data Items for Blind Users. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces . 32–45

    2023

  99. [107]

    Roland van Rens Rathelot and See-Yu Thijs Chan. 2023. Rethinking the skills gap. IZA World of Labor (2023)

    2023

  100. [108]

    Resume Worded. 2024. Resume Worded. https://resumeworded.com/

    2024

  101. [109]

    Resumehead. 2024. Self-Reflection: Describing Your Personality in an Interview. https://resumehead.com/blog/self-reflection

    2024

  102. [110]

    Lizzie Richardson and David Bissell. 2019. Geographies of digital skill. Geoforum 99 (2019), 278–286

    2019

  103. [111]

    Abir Saha and Anne Marie Piper. 2020. Understanding audio production practices of people with vision impairments. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility . 1–13

    2020

  104. [112]

    Alan M Saks and Blake E Ashforth. 2000. Change in job search behaviors and employment outcomes. Journal of vocational behavior 56, 2 (2000), 277–287

    2000

  105. [113]

    Gregory Schraw, Kent J Crippen, and Kendall Hartley. 2006. Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in science education 36 (2006), 111–139

    2006

  106. [114]

    Victoria Schwanda Sosik, Xuan Zhao, and Dan Cosley. 2012. See friendship, sort of: How conversation and digital traces might support reflection on friendships. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work . 1145–1154

    2012

  107. [115]

    Akhilesh Kumar Sharma and Sushil Kumar Rai. 2024. COVID-19 and Sectoral Employment in India: Impact and Implications. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics (2024), 1–20

    2024

  108. [116]

    Fact Sheet. [n. d.]. Visual impairment and blindness. ([n. d.])

  109. [117]

    Sabina Siebert and Anita Walsh. 2013. Reflection in work-based learning: self-regulation or self-liberation? Teaching in Higher Education 18, 2 (2013), 167–178

    2013

  110. [118]

    Arielle Silverman, Edward Bell, and Mary Ann Mendez. 2019. Understanding the employment experiences of Americans who are legally blind. Journal of Rehabilitation 85, 1 (2019), 44–52

    2019

  111. [119]

    Rohan Bir Singh. 2023. Progress, but not enough: Why blindness remains a public health challenge in India. https://www.newslaundry.com/2023/ 05/17/progress-but-not-enough-why-blindness-remains-a-public-health-challenge-in-india

    2023

  112. [120]

    Slack Technologies. 2024. Slack Help Center. https://slack.com/help

    2024

  113. [121]

    Petr Slovák, Christopher Frauenberger, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2017. Reflective practicum: A framework of sensitising concepts to design for transformative reflection. In Proceedings of the 2017 chi conference on human factors in computing systems . 2696–2707

    2017

  114. [122]

    Samriddhi Srivastava. 2023. India’s first blind IT Pro Krishnakant sheds light on employment challenges for visually impaired jobseek- ers. https://www.peoplematters.in/article/leadership/visually-impaired-jobseekers-face-hiring-hurdles-krishnakant-mane-leader-and-indias- 1st-...

    2023

  115. [123]

    Reuters Staff. 2024. Tech companies plug into India’s smaller cities for talent.Reuters (2024). https://www.reuters.com/world/india/tech-companies- plug-into-indias-smaller-cities-talent-2024-04-25/

    2024

  116. [124]

    Hannah Studd. 2024. Exploring Self-Reflection as a Collaborative Process. In Companion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing . 13–16. 27 Conference acronym ’XX, June 03–05, 2018, Woodstock, NY Nayak, et al

    2024

  117. [125]

    Ciara Taylor and Samantha Dempsey. 2020. Designing Ethics Tools for Self-reflection, Collaboration, and Facilitation. Ethics in Design and Communication: Critical Perspectives (2020), 143–147

    2020

  118. [126]

    Harriet R Tenenbaum, Naomi E Winstone, Patrick J Leman, and Rachel E Avery. 2020. How effective is peer interaction in facilitating learning? A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 112, 7 (2020), 1303

    2020

  119. [127]

    The Wire Staff. 2024. Skill India Mission: Short Courses, No Employable Skills and a Lack of Jobs. The Wire (2024). https://thewire.in/labour/the- reality-of-skill-india-mission-short-courses-no-employable-skills-and-rise-in-unemploy-ment/

    2024

  120. [128]

    UK Government. 2010. Equality Act 2010. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents

    2010

  121. [129]

    Department of Labor

    U.S. Department of Labor. 2024. Americans with Disabilities Act. https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/disability/ada

    2024

  122. [130]

    Valasia-Anna Valavosiki, Emmanouil Stiakakis, and Alexander Chatzigeorgiou. 2019. Development of a Framework for the Assessment of Soft Skills in the ICT Sector. In Operational Research in the Digital Era–ICT Challenges: 6th International Symposium and 28th National Conference...

    2019

  123. [131]

    Edwin AJ van Hooft. 2018. 12 Self-Regulatory Perspectives in the Theory of Planned Job Search Behavior: Deliberate and Automatic Self-Regulation Strategies to Facilitate Job Seeking. The Oxford handbook of job loss and job search (2018), 205

    2018

  124. [132]

    Edwin AJ Van Hooft, Marise Ph Born, Toon W Taris, and Henk van der Flier. 2004. Job search and the theory of planned behavior: Minority–majority group differences in The Netherlands. Journal of Vocational Behavior 65, 3 (2004), 366–390

    2004

  125. [133]

    Edwin AJ Van Hooft and Mireille De Jong. 2009. Predicting job seeking for temporary employment using the theory of planned behaviour: The moderating role of individualism and collectivism. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology 82, 2 (2009), 295–316

    2009

  126. [134]

    Edwin AJ van Hooft, John D Kammeyer-Mueller, Connie R Wanberg, Ruth Kanfer, and Gokce Basbug. 2021. Job search and employment success: A quantitative review and future research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology 106, 5 (2021), 674

    2021

  127. [135]

    Edwin AJ Van Hooft, Connie R Wanberg, and Greet Van Hoye. 2013. Moving beyond job search quantity: Towards a conceptualization and self-regulatory framework of job search quality. Organizational Psychology Review 3, 1 (2013), 3–40

    2013

  128. [136]

    Aditya Vashistha, Erin Brady, William Thies, and Edward Cutrell. 2014. Educational content creation and sharing by low-income visually impaired people in India. In Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Symposium on Computing for Development . 63–72

    2014

  129. [137]

    Nithiya Venkatraman, Anand Aiyer, Yash Prakash, and Vikas Ashok. 2024. You Shall Know a Forum by the Words they Keep: Analyzing Language Use in Accessibility Forums for Blind Users. In Proceedings of the 35th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media . 230–238

    2024

  130. [138]

    Vision-Aid. 2024. Project Springboard. https://visionaid.org/project-springboard/

    2024

  131. [139]

    Connie Wanberg, Gokce Basbug, Edwin AJ Van Hooft, and Archana Samtani. 2012. Navigating the black hole: Explicating layers of job search context and adaptational responses. Personnel Psychology 65, 4 (2012), 887–926

    2012

  132. [140]

    Connie R Wanberg, Abdifatah A Ali, and Borbala Csillag. 2020. Job seeking: The process and experience of looking for a job. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 7 (2020), 315–337

    2020

  133. [141]

    Connie R Wanberg, Ruth Kanfer, and Maria Rotundo. 1999. Unemployed individuals: motives, job-search competencies, and job-search constraints as predictors of job seeking and reemployment. Journal of Applied psychology 84, 6 (1999), 897

    1999

  134. [142]

    Connie R Wanberg, Jing Zhu, and Edwin AJ Van Hooft. 2010. The job search grind: Perceived progress, self-reactions, and self-regulation of search effort. Academy of Management Journal 53, 4 (2010), 788–807

    2010

  135. [143]

    Shen Wang, Tianlong Xu, Hang Li, Chaoli Zhang, Joleen Liang, Jiliang Tang, Philip S Yu, and Qingsong Wen. 2024. Large language models for education: A survey and outlook. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.18105 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Earnest Wheeler and Tawanna R Dillahunt. 2018. Navigating the job search as a low-resourced job seeker. InProceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–10

    2018

  137. [145]

    Zara Whysall. 2018. Cognitive biases in recruitment, selection, and promotion: The risk of subconscious discrimination. Hidden inequalities in the workplace: A guide to the current challenges, issues and business solutions (2018), 215–243

    2018

  138. [146]

    Kate Z Williams. 2008. Effects of practice and feedback on interview performance . Ph. D. Dissertation. Clemson University

    2008

  139. [147]

    Svetlana Yarosh, Elizabeth Bonsignore, Sarah McRoberts, and Tamara Peyton. 2016. YouthTube: Youth video authorship on YouTube and Vine. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing . 1423–1437

    2016

  140. [148]

    Zoom Video Communications, Inc. 2024. Zoom Support Center. https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us 28

    2024

  141. [2018]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–24

    ’We can go anywhere’ Understanding Independence through a Case Study of Ride-hailing Use by People with Visual Impairments in metropolitan India. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (2018), 1–24

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.