Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Coordination of two robotic manipulators for object retrieval in clutter

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2109.15220 v1 pith:LPM6HZS6 submitted 2021-09-30 cs.RO

classification cs.RO
keywords objecttaskscluttermethodobjectsrelocatedrelocationrobot
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the problem of retrieving a target object from a confined space by two robotic manipulators where overhand grasps are not allowed. If other movable obstacles occlude the target, more than one object should be relocated to clear the path to reach the target object. With two robots, the relocation could be done efficiently by simultaneously performing relocation tasks. However, the precedence constraint between the tasks (e.g, some objects at the front should be removed to manipulate the objects in the back) makes the simultaneous task execution difficult. We propose a coordination method that determines which robot relocates which object so as to perform tasks simultaneously. Given a set of objects to be relocated, the objective is to maximize the number of turn-takings of the robots in performing relocation tasks. Thus, one robot can pick an object in the clutter while the other robot places an object in hand to the outside of the clutter. However, the object to be relocated may not be accessible to all robots, so taking turns could not always be achieved. Our method is based on the optimal uniform-cost search so the number of turn-takings is proven to be maximized. We also propose a greedy variant whose computation time is shorter. From experiments, we show that our method reduces the completion time of the mission by at least 22.9% (at most 27.3%) compared to the methods with no consideration of turn-taking.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tabletop Object Rearrangement: Structure, Complexity, and Efficient Combinatorial Search-Based Solutions

    cs.RO 2024-12 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    Running-buffer minimization for tabletop rearrangement is NP-hard, can require Ω(√n) buffers even for identical cylinders in the worst case, and exact search algorithms scale to over 100 objects.

Pith tools