Pith. sign in

REVIEW

FastEnsemble: scalable ensemble clustering on large networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2409.02077 v2 pith:LXNCZAQQ submitted 2024-09-03 cs.SI

FastEnsemble: scalable ensemble clustering on large networks

classification cs.SI
keywords clusteringalgorithmsconsensusfastensemblenetworksfastconsensusmethodsdifferent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many community detection algorithms are inherently stochastic, leading to variations in their output depending on input parameters and random seeds. This variability makes the results of a single run of these algorithms less reliable. Moreover, different clustering algorithms, optimization criteria (e.g., modularity, the Constant Potts model), and resolution values can result in substantially different partitions on the same network. Consensus clustering methods, such as ECG and FastConsensus, have been proposed to reduce the instability of non-deterministic algorithms and improve their accuracy by combining a set of partitions resulting from multiple runs of a clustering algorithm. In this work, we introduce FastEnsemble, a new consensus clustering method. Our results on a wide range of synthetic networks show that FastEnsemble produces more accurate clusterings than two other consensus clustering methods, ECG and FastConsensus, for many model conditions. Furthermore, FastEnsemble is fast enough to be used on networks with more than 3 million nodes, and so improves on the speed and scalability of FastConsensus. Finally, we showcase the utility of consensus clustering methods in mitigating the effect of resolution limit and clustering networks that are only partially covered by communities.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.