Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Posterior Distribution for the Number of Clusters in Dirichlet Process Mixture Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1905.09959 v2 pith:LYOHMXHW submitted 2019-05-23 stat.ML cs.LGmath.STstat.TH

classification stat.MLcs.LGmath.STstat.TH
keywords clustersnumberdistributionsposteriordistributiondpmmdirichletmixture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Dirichlet process mixture models (DPMM) play a central role in Bayesian nonparametrics, with applications throughout statistics and machine learning. DPMMs are generally used in clustering problems where the number of clusters is not known in advance, and the posterior distribution is treated as providing inference for this number. Recently, however, it has been shown that the DPMM is inconsistent in inferring the true number of components in certain cases. This is an asymptotic result, and it would be desirable to understand whether it holds with finite samples, and to more fully understand the full posterior. In this work, we provide a rigorous study for the posterior distribution of the number of clusters in DPMM under different prior distributions on the parameters and constraints on the distributions of the data. We provide novel lower bounds on the ratios of probabilities between $s+1$ clusters and $s$ clusters when the prior distributions on parameters are chosen to be Gaussian or uniform distributions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Multimodal Ambivalence/Hesitancy Recognition in Videos for Personalized Digital Health Interventions

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Standard deep multimodal models and LLM zero-shot inference achieve only limited performance on video ambivalence/hesitancy recognition for digital health personalization.

Pith tools