Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

A PAH deficit in the starburst core of a distant spiral galaxy

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In PACS-830, a starburst spiral at $z=1.46$, the core's $\mathrm{IR}_8$ reaches about 18, roughly twice the spiral-arm value, indicating a deficit of 8-micron PAH emission.

desk verdict First resolved IR8 map at z>1 shows a core PAH deficit in a spiral starburst, but the claim rests on a uniform CO conversion that needs per-pixel validation. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.09728 v2 pith:LZM6SLSY submitted 2025-05-14 astro-ph.GA

Zhaoxuan Liu , John D. Silverman , Emanuele Daddi , Boris S. Kalita , Annagrazia Puglisi , Qinyue Fei , Alvio Renzini , Daichi Kashino
show 27 more authors
Francesco Valentino Jeyhan S. Kartaltepe Daizhong Liu Pablo G. Pérez-González Jed McKinney Caitlin M. Casey Xuheng Ding Andreas Faisst Maximilien Franco Darshan Kakkad Anton M. Koekemoer Erini Lambrides Steven Gillman Ghassem Gozaliasl Henry Joy McCracken Jason Rhodes Brant E. Robertson Giulia Rodighiero Wiphu Rujopakarn Tomoko L. Suzuki Takumi S. Tanaka Brittany N. Vanderhoof Aswin P. Vijayan Olivia R. Cooper Aidan Kaminsky Georgios E. Magdis Namrata Roy
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords PAHdeficitIR8starburstgalaxyhigh-redshiftspiralJWSTMIRIALMACO(5-4)bulgeformationinterstellarmedium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that PACS-830, a starburst galaxy at $z=1.46$ that JWST shows to be a grand-design spiral (two well-defined arms) rather than a merger remnant, has a core where the ratio $\mathrm{IR}_8 = L_{\rm IR}/L_8$ reaches about 18, roughly twice the value in its two spiral arms; here $L_8$ tracks the 8-micron emission of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), the mid-infrared-emitting dust grains. The authors construct the first spatially resolved $\mathrm{IR}_8$ map at $z>1$ by converting ALMA CO(5-4) emission into total infrared luminosity and using the JWST MIRI F1800W image for the rest-frame 8-micron luminosity. They interpret the elevated core ratio as a deficit of 8-micron PAH emission, likely from destruction of PAH molecules by the intense radiation field or suppressed photodissociation-region emission in a forming bulge. If correct, the result cautions against using PAH emission as a spatially resolved star-formation tracer and shows that an intense starburst at cosmic noon can be sustained by disk processes, not only by a major merger.

What carries the argument

The central object is the spatially resolved $\mathrm{IR}_8$ map, $\mathrm{IR}_8 \equiv L_{\rm IR}/L_8$, which acts as a resolved version of the galaxy-wide infrared-to-PAH ratio. The map is built from two matched tracers: the ALMA CO($J=5-4$) map, converted pixel-by-pixel to $L_{\rm IR}$ with the empirical relation $\log L_{\rm TIR}/L_\odot = \log L'_{\rm CO[5-4]}/({\rm K\,km\,s^{-1}\,pc^2}) + 2.52$, and the JWST MIRI F1800W image, which captures rest-frame 8-micron emission where the 7.7-micron PAH feature dominates, k-corrected with an M82 SED template. The CO map is convolved to the 0.59-arcsecond MIRI PSF and masked at low signal-to-noise before division. Companion Sérsic and uv-plane Spergel fits quantify how much more compact the CO-based infrared emission is than the PAH-tracing F1800W emission, providing the geometric evidence for the deficit.

What would settle it

Rebuild the $\mathrm{IR}_8$ map using an $L_{\rm IR}$ tracer that does not depend on CO(5-4) excitation, such as matched-resolution ALMA dust continuum or CO(1-0); if the core-to-arm ratio drops to near unity, the reported PAH deficit is a conversion artifact rather than a physical deficit.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that in PACS-830 the spatial distribution of rest-frame 8-micron emission does not track the distribution of star formation traced by CO(5-4). With $L_{\rm IR}$ inferred from the ALMA CO(5-4) map through the adopted empirical conversion and $L_8$ from the MIRI F1800W image, the $\mathrm{IR}_8$ map peaks near 18 in the 0.5-arcsec core and drops to roughly half that in the spiral arms. Two-dimensional modeling supports the difference: the CO emission is more centrally concentrated than the F1800W emission, with Sérsic indices around 1.7 and 1.0 respectively. The authors conclude that the core has a genuine PAH deficit, unlikely to be caused by an AGN (there is no AGN evidence, and the F1800W image is fainter, not brighter, in the core), and they attribute it to PAH destruction by the hard ionizing radiation or reduced PDR emission. They further conclude that PACS-830 is a face-on grand-design spiral with a growing bulge, with one arm carrying about 21% of the CO flux, so a disruptive major-merger trigger is not required.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the same empirical CO(5-4)-to-total-infrared conversion holds in the starburst core and in the spiral arms; if the warm, dense core excites CO(5-4) more strongly, $L_{\rm IR}$ would be overestimated there and the $\mathrm{IR}_8$ peak could be an artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Resolved PAH-based star-formation maps at high redshift will undercount star formation in dense starburst cores unless the $\mathrm{IR}_8$ enhancement is taken into account.
  • Starburst activity well above the main sequence at $z\sim1.5$ can be powered by a spiral disk with clumps and a forming bulge, weakening the assumption that such systems are major mergers.
  • An elevated $\mathrm{IR}_8$ in a compact core can be used as a spatial signpost for a bulge in formation or an extreme star-forming region, extending the global $\mathrm{IR}_8$-starburstiness relation to resolved scales.
  • The core's infrared surface density sits near the critical value where $\mathrm{IR}_8$ begins rising, so the observed deficit is consistent with the dust-bounded, high-radiation-field picture rather than requiring an AGN.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An untested consequence of the radiative-destruction explanation is that the same core should show suppressed 6.2- and 11.3-micron PAH features with elevated continuum temperature; MIRI MRS spectroscopy of PACS-830 would test this directly.
  • An independent $L_{\rm IR}$ tracer at matched resolution, such as ALMA dust continuum or CO(1-0), could separate a true PAH deficit from an overestimate of $L_{\rm IR}$ in the core caused by enhanced CO(5-4) excitation.
  • Applied to larger samples, resolved $\mathrm{IR}_8$ maps could reveal how many apparent main-sequence galaxies hide growing bulges, linking the deficit to inside-out quenching rather than only to starburst outliers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents resolved JWST (NIRCam and MIRI F1800W) and ALMA CO(J=5-4) observations of PACS-830, a z=1.46 starburst galaxy, and shows that it has a grand-design spiral morphology with a central bulge, two arms, and clumps. The authors construct a spatially resolved IR8 (= L_IR / L_8) map by converting the CO(5-4) map to L_IR via Eq. (1) (Daddi et al. 2015) and using F1800W as an L_8 proxy, finding that IR8 peaks near 18 in the core, about twice the arm values. They interpret this as a PAH deficit in the starburst core, likely due to PAH destruction by intense radiation or reduced PDR emission, and argue that this is the first resolved detection of such a deficit at z>1. The paper also discusses the morphological evidence for a non-major-merger origin of the starburst and the possible role of a mini-merger companion.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides the first spatially resolved measurement of IR8 variations at z>1, with direct implications for using PAH emission as an SFR tracer in high-redshift galaxies and for the physical conditions in high-z starburst cores. The analysis is technically careful: it uses spatially matched JWST and ALMA data, performs foreground subtraction, pixel-by-pixel SED fitting, and uv-plane modeling, and it explicitly relies on external calibrations without fitting new free parameters. The morphological evidence for a spiral starburst that is not a major merger is a valuable addition to the growing JWST-based picture of disk-like high-z starbursts. However, the PAH-deficit conclusion rests on the assumption that a single CO(5-4)-to-L_IR conversion applies uniformly across the galaxy, an assumption that the paper itself identifies as a systematic uncertainty and that is not fully resolved by the current analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Eq. (1)] The uniform application of the Daddi et al. (2015) CO(5-4)-to-L_TIR conversion is the load-bearing step for the IR8 map, but the relation is calibrated on galaxy-integrated luminosities and there is no evidence that the same constant holds in the nucleus and the arms of PACS-830. In the warm, dense starburst core, enhanced CO(5-4) excitation relative to the total CO reservoir would cause Eq. (1) to overestimate L_IR, inflating IR8 and producing a spurious PAH deficit. The rebuttal in Section 4.2, based on the morphological difference between F1800W and CO(5-4), is not quantitative, and the manuscript's own Appendix C shows VLA 3 GHz emission with two comparable peaks in the core and the eastern arm, whereas CO(5-4) is strongly centrally concentrated; if radio emission traces L_IR, this indicates that the CO-based conversion underweights the arm relative to the core, which is exactly the direction needed to create the claimed IR8 enhancement. The authors should test the robustness of the IR8 map with an alternative L_IR tracer (e.g., radio continuum or available dust continuum) or provide an explicit excitation-correction model, rather than relying on the qualitative morphological argument.
  2. [Section 3.2 (F1800W k-correction)] The F1800W flux is converted to L_8 by applying a single M82-template k-correction (factor 1.3), but the 8 micron band is a broad filter that includes PAH features and underlying continuum, and the spectral shape may vary spatially across the galaxy. The authors acknowledge in Section 5.1 that the continuum contribution is uncertain, yet they do not quantify how this uncertainty propagates to the IR8 map. If the continuum fraction is higher in the core (e.g., due to hot dust), the L_8 map would be overestimated there, partially masking a PAH deficit; if lower, it would enhance the deficit. The manuscript should provide an estimate of the spatially varying continuum contribution to F1800W, or at least show that the claimed factor-of-two IR8 variation is robust to plausible continuum variations.
  3. [Sections 3.3-3.4] The claim that the PAH distribution is more disk-like than the L_IR distribution is supported by comparing the Sérsic index from the F1800W image (n ~ 1, fitted in the image plane with Galight) to the Sérsic index from the CO map (n ~ 1.7, derived from a Spergel model fitted in the uv-plane with GILDAS). These indices are obtained with different fitting methods, different data representations (image vs. visibilities), and different noise properties, and the reported uncertainties of ±0.2 do not include systematic differences between the two approaches. Before using this index difference as supporting evidence for a PAH deficit, the authors should demonstrate that the difference is not an artifact of the fitting methodology, for example by fitting both maps in the same plane or at matched S/N ratio.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Figure 3] The color-bar label 'IR8 = L_CO5 4 IR /L_F1800W' is difficult to parse; please use the same notation as in the text and Eq. (1) (e.g., IR8 = L_IR / L_8) and define all symbols in the caption.
  2. [Section 3.2 and Figure 4] The northern spiral arm is not robustly detected in CO(5-4) and is treated as an upper limit, but the text does not specify how the mask (CO S/N > 4) and the upper-limit treatment are applied consistently in Figure 4; please clarify this procedure and state whether the shown northern-arm points are the actual measurements or the upper limits.
  3. [Section 5.1] The statement 'SFE is proportional to IR8 (SFE = SFR/Mgas ∝ IR8)' assumes a constant ratio between PAH luminosity and molecular gas mass; this proportionality should be stated as an assumption rather than an equality, since spatial variations in PAH abundance or excitation are the very subject of the paper.
  4. [Abstract and Section 6] The claim of 'the first time at z>1' is a strong novelty statement; consider clarifying it as 'the first spatially resolved IR8 map at z>1' or adding a brief caveat about prior global measurements, to avoid overstatement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central IR8 map is an observed two-tracer ratio using external calibrations, not a fitted or self-referential quantity.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a resolved measurement: IR8 = L_IR/L_8, with L_IR obtained pixel-by-pixel from ALMA CO(5-4) via the externally calibrated relation of Daddi et al. (2015) (Eq. 1) and L_8 from a MIRI/F1800W image with an M82-template k-correction. Neither tracer is defined in terms of the other, and neither is fit to the target result. The CO-to-L_TIR conversion is a fixed literature constant applied uniformly; the F1800W flux is directly observed. The comparison against Elbaz et al. (2011, 2018) is a test of the measured points against published relations, not an input to the measurement. The paper explicitly identifies the main vulnerability in Sec. 4.2—possible CO excitation or temperature variations across the galaxy—and argues from the different morphologies of F1800W and CO that systematics are unlikely; Appendix C's VLA 3 GHz peaks are also discussed. That is a systematic-uncertainty concern about the astrophysical interpretation, not a circular derivation. Self-citations such as Liu et al. (2024b) for SED-fitting procedures and Liu et al. (2021) for the PAH SED template support methodology but are not load-bearing: the IR8 spatial variation and its PAH-deficit interpretation stand on the independent ALMA and MIRI data and on external calibrations. No step in the paper reduces by construction to its own inputs, and no prediction is a renamed fit.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on two external empirical calibrations (CO-to-L_TIR conversion and F1800W k-correction) and standard SED and main-sequence assumptions. No new physical entities are introduced: the PAH destruction and decreased PDR emission interpretations invoke established mechanisms from prior literature. The paper's own limitation statements (Section 5.1: 'IR8 is just a color index'; Section 4.2: possible CO excitation systematics) are the key caveats.

free parameters (2)
  • L_TIR / L'_CO(5-4) conversion constant = log L_TIR/L_sun = log L'_CO(5-4) + 2.52 (Eq. 1, Daddi et al. 2015)
    External empirical calibration used to convert the CO(5-4) map into the L_IR map that defines the IR8 ratio. Not fit in this paper, but the central PAH deficit claim depends on its uniform application across the galaxy.
  • F1800W k-correction factor = 1.3 (M82 template from Polletta et al. 2007)
    Applied to convert F1800W flux to match the IRAC 8-micron passband used in the Elbaz et al. (2011) IR8 definition. Template-based, not fit to this galaxy's SED, and the paper acknowledges continuum contamination.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Daddi et al. (2015) CO(5-4)-to-L_TIR relation holds locally within the galaxy, including the starburst core and spiral arms.
    Invoked in Section 3.2, Eq. 1. The 0.2 dex scatter and potential excitation gradients are acknowledged as a systematic uncertainty in Section 4.2, but not calibrated for on resolved scales.
  • domain assumption F1800W flux, after M82-template k-correction, is a valid proxy for rest-frame 8-micron PAH-dominated luminosity L8.
    Section 3.2 and Section 5.1. Authors state IR8 is 'just a color index' and argue continuum dilution is unlikely to explain the deficit, but the continuum contribution is not directly measured.
  • domain assumption Pixel-by-pixel SED fits with constant star-formation history and solar metallicity (bagpipes) correctly recover stellar mass and dust attenuation maps.
    Section 3.1, following Liu et al. (2024b). Used for the spiral morphology and R_SB claims, not directly required for the IR8 map.
  • domain assumption The WebbPSF model for MIRI F1800W accurately represents the PSF for Sersic decomposition.
    Section 3.3. Used to derive the Sersic index n~1 for F1800W versus n~1.7 for CO, supporting the compactness contrast that underlies the PAH deficit interpretation.
  • domain assumption The Speagle et al. (2014) main-sequence relation is applicable at z=1.46 for computing R_SB.
    Section 4.2, Figure 5. Used to compare starburstiness with IR8; not required for the core IR8 variation itself.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A PAH deficit in the starburst core of a distant spiral galaxy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LZM6SLSY

@misc{pith2026250509728,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A PAH deficit in the starburst core of a distant spiral galaxy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LZM6SLSY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.09728}
}
abstract

We present high-resolution and spatially-matched observations with JWST and ALMA of a starburst galaxy (PACS-830) at $z=1.46$. The NIRCam observations mainly trace the stellar light while the CO ($J$=5--4) observations map the dense molecular gas at kpc scales. Both datasets reveal the morphology to be that of a gas/dust rich bulge with two extending arms, together resembling a grand-design spiral galaxy. The more pronounced arm contributes 21 $\pm$ 6\% of the total CO emission. These results demonstrate that starburst activity at high redshift can be triggered, without undergoing a highly disruptive major merger. We assess the strength and distribution of star formation using two tracers: (1) Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) emission detected at $8~\mu$m ($L_8$) with a MIRI/F1800W image, and (2) $L_\mathrm{IR}$, inferred from the CO ($J$=5--4) map. The spatial profiles of the $L_\mathrm{IR}$ and $L_8$ are dissimilar, thus leading to a significant deficit of mid-IR ($L_8$) emission in the nucleus. We hypothesize that this is due to the destruction of PAH molecules by the intense ionizing radiation field or decreased emission in the photodissociation region, as seen in nearby star-forming regions and consistent with the galaxy-wide properties of distant starbursts. This study reveals spatial variations in the $L_8$ to $L_\mathrm{IR}$ ratio for the first time at $z>1$, in agreement with expectations from theory. Our analysis underscores the pivotal role of joint high-resolution observations with JWST and ALMA in discerning the different phases of the interstellar medium (ISM) and revealing internal physics in galaxy substructures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.09728 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Observations of PACS-830. The surrounding panels show images of different instrument/filter combinations: (a) HST F435W, (b) HST F606W, (c) HST F814W, (d) JWST/NIRCam F115W, (e) F150W, (f) F277W, (g) F444W, and (h) MIRI F770W and (i) F1800W images. ALMA observations of PACS-830 are shown in the larger upper panels (j: CO 5–4, k: 1.33mm continuum). All panels span the same region of the sky, with north at the top and… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Spatially-resolved SED fitting: stellar mass (a), SFR (b), and dust extinction (c). CO (𝐽=5–4) contours are overlaid in panels a and b for com￾parison. In panel c, dust continuum contours are shown for comparison with the dust attenuation. Contours for the CO emission are plotted at levels of 3, 4, 6, and 9 × 𝜎rms. Contours for the dust continuum are at the same levels, with 𝜎rms = 0.01 mJy beam−1 . The physical sca… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spatially-resolved 𝐼𝑅8 map of PACS-830. The PSF of F1800W is shown in the lower-left corner. CO J=5–4 contours are overlaid for compar￾ison, highlighting regions of the dense molecular gas. The figure shows the same field of view as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 𝐼𝑅8 vs. ΣIR, with measurements, errorbars (0.2 dex) and upper limits from the eastern and northern spiral arms and central region (0 ′′ .3) shown in green, orange and purple, respectively. The ’critical density’ in Elbaz et al. (2011) and Díaz-Santos et al. (2017) is h…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Correlations of ALMA CO(2-1) with JWST mid-infrared fluxes down to scale of $\lesssim$100 parsec in nearby star-forming galaxies from PHANGS

    astro-ph.GA 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    At 100-pc scales in 19 PHANGS galaxies, CO(2-1) correlates log-linearly with JWST PAH and dust emission, with the intercept—not slope—varying bimodally with host star-formation strength.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

131 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Abdurro’uf Lin Y.-T., Wu P.-F., Akiyama M., 2021, @doi [ApJS] 10.3847/1538-4365/abebe2 , 254, 15

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abebe2 2021

  2. [2]

    P., Dudley C., Fischer J., Satyapal S., van Hoof P

    Abel N. P., Dudley C., Fischer J., Satyapal S., van Hoof P. A. M., 2009, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/701/2/1147 , 701, 1147

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/701/2/1147 2009

  3. [3]

    B., et al., 2022, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac795b , 934, 64

    Akins H. B., et al., 2022, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac795b , 934, 64

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac795b 2022

  4. [4]

    Alberts S., et al., 2024, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7396 , 976, 224

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7396 2024

  5. [5]

    L., et al., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347465 , 688, A53

    Bail A. L., et al., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347465 , 688, A53

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347465 2024

  6. [6]

    J., Decleir M., Calzetti D., Mathew J., Wisnioski E., da Cunha E., 2025, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia] 10.1017/pasa.2024.129 , 42, e022

    Battisti A., Shivaei I., Park H. J., Decleir M., Calzetti D., Mathew J., Wisnioski E., da Cunha E., 2025, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia] 10.1017/pasa.2024.129 , 42, e022

    doi:10.1017/pasa.2024.129 2025

  7. [7]

    N., Accomazzi A., Mink D

    Bertin E., 2011, in Evans I. N., Accomazzi A., Mink D. J., Rots A. H., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 442, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XX. p. 435

    2011

  8. [8]

    K., Salas H., 2019, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 , 622, A103

    Boquien M., Burgarella D., Roehlly Y., Buat V., Ciesla L., Corre D., Inoue A. K., Salas H., 2019, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 , 622, A103

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 2019

Show all 131 references
  1. [9]

    Bottrell C., et al., 2024, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stad2971 , 527, 6506

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 355--390, @doi 10.1007/978-3-319-19378-6_13 , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19378-6_13

    Bournaud F., 2016, in Laurikainen E., Peletier R., Gadotti D., eds, , Galactic Bulges . Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 355--390, @doi 10.1007/978-3-319-19378-6_13 , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19378-6_13

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    Brammer G., 2023, grizli , Zenodo, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.7712834

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    S., 1995, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts

    Briggs D. S., 1995, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts. p. 112.02

    1995

  5. [13]

    Calabrò A., et al., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449768 , 690, A290

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013seg..book..419C

    Calzetti D., 2013, Star Formation Rate Indicators , @doi 10.48550/arXiv.1208.2997. , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013seg..book..419C

    2013 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    Capak P., et al., 2007, @doi [ApJS] 10.1086/519081 , 172, 99

    2007 doi

  8. [16]

    Cappelluti N., et al., 2009, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/200810794 , 497, 635

    2009 doi

  9. [17]

    C., McLure R

    Carnall A. C., McLure R. J., Dunlop J. S., Dav\'e R., 2018, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/sty2169 , 480, 4379

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    M., 2012, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21455.x , 425, 3094

    Casey C. M., 2012, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21455.x , 425, 3094

    2012

  11. [19]

    M., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc , 954, 31

    Casey C. M., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc , 954, 31

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Chabrier G., 2003, @doi [PASP] 10.1086/376392 , 115, 763

    2003 doi

  13. [21]

    Chastenet J., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acac94 , 944, L12

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    Civano F., et al., 2016, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/62 , 819, 62

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    Comrie A., et al., 2021, CARTA: The Cube Analysis and Rendering Tool for Astronomy , @doi 10.5281/zenodo.4905459 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4905459

    2021 doi

  16. [24]

    J., Huang Z

    Condon J. J., Huang Z. P., Yin Q. F., Thuan T. X., 1991, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/170407 , 378, 65

    1991 doi

  17. [25]

    E., Cornwell T

    Conway J. E., Cornwell T. J., Wilkinson P. N., 1990, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1990MNRAS.246..490C 246, 490

    1990

  18. [26]

    J., 2008, @doi [IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing] 10.1109/JSTSP.2008.2006388 , 2, 793

    Cornwell T. J., 2008, @doi [IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing] 10.1109/JSTSP.2008.2006388 , 2, 793

    2008

  19. [27]

    Cortzen I., et al., 2019, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/sty2777 , 482, 1618

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    L., González-López J., Barger A

    Cowie L. L., González-López J., Barger A. J., Bauer F. E., Hsu L. Y., Wang W. H., 2018, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aadc63 , 865, 106

    2018 doi

  21. [29]

    Daddi E., et al., 2007, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/521818 , 670, 156

    2007 doi

  22. [30]

    Daddi E., et al., 2015, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425043 , 577, A46

    2015 doi

  23. [31]

    A., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aca769 , 944, L23

    Dale D. A., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8213/aca769 , 944, L23

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    Dekel A., et al., 2009, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/nature07648 , 457, 451

    2009 doi

  25. [33]

    Delvecchio I., et al., 2021, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039647 , 647, A123

    2021 doi

  26. [34]

    Desai V., et al., 2007, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/522104 , 669, 810

    2007 doi

  27. [36]

    Ding X., et al., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5b90 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...888...37D 888, 37

    doi

  28. [37]

    L., Theis C., Pringle J

    Dobbs C. L., Theis C., Pringle J. E., Bate M. R., 2010, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.16161.x , 403, 625

    2010

  29. [38]

    L., Rieke G

    Donley J. L., Rieke G. H., Pérez-González P. G., Barro G., 2008, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/591510 , 687, 111

    2008 doi

  30. [39]

    T., 2003, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 , 41, 241

    Draine B. T., 2003, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 , 41, 241

    2003 arXiv

  31. [40]

    T., Li A., 2007, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/511055 , 657, 810

    Draine B. T., Li A., 2007, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/511055 , 657, 810

    2007 doi

  32. [41]

    S., et al., 2021, PRIMER: Public Release IMaging for Extragalactic Research , JWST Proposal

    Dunlop J. S., et al., 2021, PRIMER: Public Release IMaging for Extragalactic Research , JWST Proposal. Cycle 1, ID. \#1837

    2021

  33. [42]

    Díaz-Santos T., et al., 2011, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/32 , 741, 32

    2011 doi

  34. [43]

    Díaz-Santos T., et al., 2017, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa81d7 , 846, 32

    2017 doi

  35. [44]

    V., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJL] 10.3847/2041-8213/acac92 , 944, L16

    Egorov O. V., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJL] 10.3847/2041-8213/acac92 , 944, L16

    2023 doi

  36. [45]

    Elbaz D., et al., 2011, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117239 , 533, A119

    2011 doi

  37. [46]

    Elbaz D., et al., 2018, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732370 , 616, A110

    2018 doi

  38. [47]

    M., Elmegreen B

    Elmegreen D. M., Elmegreen B. G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...781...11E 781, 11

    2014 doi

  39. [48]

    G., Bournaud F., Elmegreen D

    Elmegreen B. G., Bournaud F., Elmegreen D. M., 2008, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/592190 , 688, 67

    2008 doi

  40. [49]

    Faisst A. L., et al., 2024, COSMOS - Web : The Role of Galaxy Interactions and Disk Instabilities in Producing Starbursts at z 4, @doi 10.48550/arXiv.2405.09619 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.09619

    2024 doi arXiv

  41. [50]

    Ferreira L., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acec76 , 955, 94

    2023 doi

  42. [51]

    M., Wuyts S., 2020, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021910 , 58, 661

    Förster Schreiber N. M., Wuyts S., 2020, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021910 , 58, 661

    2020 doi

  43. [52]

    Genzel R., et al., 2011, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/101 , 733, 101

    2011 doi

  44. [53]

    Gillman S., et al., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451006 , 691, A299

    2024 doi

  45. [54]

    R., et al., 2014, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/142 , 794, 142

    Greve T. R., et al., 2014, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/142 , 794, 142

    2014 doi

  46. [55]

    A., et al., 2011, @doi [ApJS] 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35 , 197, 35

    Grogin N. A., et al., 2011, @doi [ApJS] 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/35 , 197, 35

    2011 doi

  47. [56]

    Gullberg B., et al., 2019, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stz2835 , 490, 4956

    2019 doi

  48. [57]

    C., Johnson B

    Hao C.-N., Kennicutt R. C., Johnson B. D., Calzetti D., Dale D. A., Moustakas J., 2011, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/124 , 741, 124

    2011 doi

  49. [58]

    D., 1993, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/173146 , 415, 93

    Helou G., Bicay M. D., 1993, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/173146 , 415, 93

    1993 doi

  50. [59]

    A., da Cunha E., 2020, @doi [Royal Society Open Science] 10.1098/rsos.200556 , 7, 200556

    Hodge J. A., da Cunha E., 2020, @doi [Royal Society Open Science] 10.1098/rsos.200556 , 7, 200556

    2020 doi

  51. [60]

    A., et al., 2016, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/103 , 833, 103

    Hodge J. A., et al., 2016, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/103 , 833, 103

    2016 doi

  52. [61]

    A., et al., 2019, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1846 , 876, 130

    Hodge J. A., et al., 2019, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1846 , 876, 130

    2019 doi

  53. [62]

    Ilbert O., et al., 2009, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1236 , 690, 1236

    2009 doi

  54. [63]

    Inami H., et al., 2013, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/156 , 777, 156

    2013 doi

  55. [64]

    F., et al., 2019, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935178 , 625, A114

    Jiménez-Andrade E. F., et al., 2019, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935178 , 625, A114

    2019 doi

  56. [65]

    Cycle 3, p

    Kakiichi K., et al., 2024, JWST Proposal. Cycle 3, p. 5893

    2024

  57. [66]

    S., Silverman J

    Kalita B. S., Silverman J. D., Daddi E., Bottrell C., Ho L. C., Ding X., Yang L., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acfee4 , 960, 25

    2023 doi

  58. [67]

    S., et al., 2024, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stae2781

    Kalita B. S., et al., 2024, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stae2781

    2024 doi

  59. [68]

    S., et al., 2025a, A multi-wavelength investigation of spiral structures in \ z 1\ galaxies with JWST , @doi 10.48550/arXiv.2501.03325 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.03325

    Kalita B. S., et al., 2025a, A multi-wavelength investigation of spiral structures in \ z 1\ galaxies with JWST , @doi 10.48550/arXiv.2501.03325 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.03325

    doi arXiv

  60. [69]

    S., Silverman J

    Kalita B. S., Silverman J. D., Daddi E., Mercier W., Ho L. C., Ding X., 2025b, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/staf031 , p. staf031

    doi

  61. [70]

    Kashino D., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab06c4 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJS..241...10K 241, 10

    2019 doi

  62. [71]

    pp 1942--1948 vol.4, @doi 10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968 , https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/488968

    Kennedy J., Eberhart R., 1995, in Proceedings of ICNN '95 - International Conference on Neural Networks . pp 1942--1948 vol.4, @doi 10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968 , https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/488968

    1995

  63. [72]

    A., Tsutsumi T., Brogan C

    Kepley A. A., Tsutsumi T., Brogan C. L., Indebetouw R., Yoon I., Mason B., Donovan Meyer J., 2020, @doi [PASP] 10.1088/1538-3873/ab5e14 , 132, 024505

    2020 doi

  64. [73]

    M., et al., 2007, @doi [ApJS] 10.1086/520086 , 172, 196

    Koekemoer A. M., et al., 2007, @doi [ApJS] 10.1086/520086 , 172, 196

    2007 doi

  65. [74]

    M., et al., 2011, @doi [ApJS] 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36 , 197, 36

    Koekemoer A. M., et al., 2011, @doi [ApJS] 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/36 , 197, 36

    2011 doi

  66. [75]

    Kokorev V., et al., 2023, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346937 , 677, A172

    2023 doi

  67. [76]

    J., 2024, @doi [ApJL] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad43eb , 968, L15

    Kuhn V., Guo Y., Martin A., Bayless J., Gates E., Puleo A. J., 2024, @doi [ApJL] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad43eb , 968, L15

    2024 doi

  68. [77]

    C., Thompson T

    Lacki B. C., Thompson T. A., 2010, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/196 , 717, 196

    2010 doi

  69. [78]

    Lai T. S. Y., Smith J. D. T., Baba S., Spoon H. W. W., Imanishi M., 2020, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abc002 , 905, 55

    2020 doi

  70. [79]

    S.-Y., et al., 2022, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ebf , 941, L36

    Lai T. S.-Y., et al., 2022, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ebf , 941, L36

    2022 doi

  71. [80]

    S.-Y., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0387 , 957, L26

    Lai T. S.-Y., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0387 , 957, L26

    2023 doi

  72. [81]

    Lai T. S. Y., Smith J. D. T., Peeters E., Spoon H. W. W., Baba S., Imanishi M., Nakagawa T., 2024, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad354b , 967, 83

    2024 doi

  73. [82]

    C., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acaaae , 944, L17

    Lee J. C., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/2041-8213/acaaae , 944, L17

    2023 doi

  74. [83]

    X., 1989, A&A, 213, 351

    Leger A., D'Hendecourt L., Boissel P., Desert F. X., 1989, A&A, 213, 351

    1989

  75. [84]

    Li A., 2020, @doi [Nat Astron] 10.1038/s41550-020-1051-1 , 4, 339

    2020 doi

  76. [85]

    Liu D., Gao Y., Isaak K., Daddi E., Yang C., Lu N., Werf P. v. d., 2015, @doi [ApJL] 10.1088/2041-8205/810/2/L14 , 810, L14

    2015 doi

  77. [86]

    Liu D., et al., 2019, @doi [ApJS] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab42da , 244, 40

    2019 doi

  78. [87]

    Liu D., et al., 2021, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abd801 , 909, 56

    2021 doi

  79. [88]

    Liu D., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aca46b , 942, 98

    2023 doi

  80. [89]

    Liu D., et al., 2024a, @doi [Nat Astron] 10.1038/s41550-024-02296-7 , 8, 1181

    doi

  81. [90]

    Liu Z., et al., 2024b, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4096 , 968, 15

    doi

  82. [91]

    Lyu Y., et al., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451067

    2024 doi

  83. [92]

    Madau P., Dickinson M., 2014, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125615 , 52, 415

    2014 doi

  84. [93]

    Magnelli B., et al., 2023, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347052 , 678, A83

    2023 doi

  85. [94]

    Marchesi S., et al., 2016, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/34 , 817, 34

    2016 doi

  86. [95]

    E., Kirkpatrick A., 2020, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab77b9 , 892, 119

    McKinney J., Pope A., Armus L., Chary R.-R., Díaz-Santos T., Dickinson M. E., Kirkpatrick A., 2020, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab77b9 , 892, 119

    2020 doi

  87. [96]

    McKinney J., et al., 2024, SCUBADive I : JWST + ALMA Analysis of 289 sub-millimeter galaxies in COSMOS - Web , @doi 10.48550/arXiv.2408.08346 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240808346M

    2024 doi arXiv

  88. [97]

    J., 2013, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/58 , 777, 58

    Murphy E. J., 2013, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/58 , 777, 58

    2013 doi

  89. [98]

    J., et al., 2011, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/67 , 737, 67

    Murphy E. J., et al., 2011, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/67 , 737, 67

    2011 doi

  90. [99]

    Pedrini A., et al., 2024, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad534d , 971, 32

    2024 doi

  91. [100]

    D., Soummer R., Elliott E

    Perrin M. D., Soummer R., Elliott E. M., Lallo M. D., Sivaramakrishnan A., 2012, in Clampin M. C., Fazio G. G., MacEwen H. A., Oschmann Jr. J. M., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 8442, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2...

    2012 doi

  92. [101]

    Polletta M., et al., 2007, @doi [ApJ] 10.1086/518113 , 663, 81

    2007 doi

  93. [102]

    Polletta M., et al., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202450671 , 690, A285

    2024 doi

  94. [103]

    Pope A., et al., 2013, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/772/2/92 , 772, 92

    2013 doi

  95. [104]

    Puglisi A., et al., 2019, @doi [ApJL] 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f92 , 877, L23

    2019 doi

  96. [105]

    Puglisi A., et al., 2021, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stab2914 , 508, 5217

    2021 doi

  97. [106]

    G., et al., 2024, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad38bb , 968, 4

    Pérez-González P. G., et al., 2024, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad38bb , 968, 4

    2024 doi

  98. [107]

    Rizzo F., et al., 2023, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202346444 , 679, A129

    2023 doi

  99. [108]

    Rodighiero G., et al., 2011, @doi [ApJL] 10.1088/2041-8205/739/2/L40 , 739, L40

    2011 doi

  100. [109]

    Ronayne K., et al., 2024, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5006 , 970, 61

    2024 doi

  101. [110]

    Rujopakarn W., et al., 2023, @doi [ApJL] 10.3847/2041-8213/accc82 , 948, L8

    2023 doi

  102. [111]

    A., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451826 , 691, L2

    Shivaei I., Boogaard L. A., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202451826 , 691, L2

    2024 doi

  103. [112]

    Shivaei I., et al., 2024, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449579 , 690, A89

    2024 doi

  104. [113]

    D., et al., 2015, @doi [ApJL] 10.1088/2041-8205/812/2/L23 , 812, L23

    Silverman J. D., et al., 2015, @doi [ApJL] 10.1088/2041-8205/812/2/L23 , 812, L23

    2015 doi

  105. [114]

    D., et al., 2018a, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae25e , 867, 92

    Silverman J. D., et al., 2018a, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae25e , 867, 92

    doi

  106. [115]

    D., et al., 2018b, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae64b , 868, 75

    Silverman J. D., et al., 2018b, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aae64b , 868, 75

    doi

  107. [116]

    Smolčić V., et al., 2017, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628704 , 602, A1

    2017 doi

  108. [117]

    M., Bout P

    Solomon P. M., Bout P. A. V., 2005, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.051804.102221 , 43, 677

    2005 arXiv

  109. [118]

    S., Steinhardt C

    Speagle J. S., Steinhardt C. L., Capak P. L., Silverman J. D., 2014, @doi [ApJS] 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15 , 214, 15

    2014 doi

  110. [119]

    N., 2010, @doi [ApJS] 10.1088/0067-0049/191/1/58 , 191, 58

    Spergel D. N., 2010, @doi [ApJS] 10.1088/0067-0049/191/1/58 , 191, 58

    2010 doi

  111. [120]

    S., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-023-05998-6 , 618, 708

    Spilker J. S., et al., 2023, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-023-05998-6 , 618, 708

    2023 doi

  112. [121]

    Stierwalt S., et al., 2013, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1088/0067-0049/206/1/1 , 206, 1

    2013 doi

  113. [122]

    Stierwalt S., et al., 2014, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1088/0004-637X/790/2/124 , 790, 124

    2014 doi

  114. [123]

    Straatman C. M. S., et al., 2016, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/0004-637X/830/1/51 , 830, 51

    2016 doi

  115. [124]

    J., et al., 2013, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/74 , 768, 74

    Tacconi L. J., et al., 2013, @doi [ApJ] 10.1088/0004-637X/768/1/74 , 768, 74

    2013 doi

  116. [125]

    J., Genzel R., Sternberg A., 2020, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141034 , 58, 157

    Tacconi L. J., Genzel R., Sternberg A., 2020, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141034 , 58, 157

    2020 doi

  117. [126]

    Tan Q.-H., et al., 2024a, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/s41586-024-08201-6 , 636, 69

    doi

  118. [127]

    Tan Q.-H., et al., 2024b, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347255 , 684, A23

    doi

  119. [128]

    Tanaka T. S., et al., 2024, The \ M \_\ rm BH \ - M \_*\ relation up to \ z sim2\ through decomposition of COSMOS - Web NIRCam images, @doi 10.48550/arXiv.2401.13742 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240113742T

    2024 doi arXiv

  120. [129]

    Teodoro E. M. D., Fraternali F., 2015, @doi [MNRAS] 10.1093/mnras/stv1213 , 451, 3021

    2015 doi

  121. [130]

    Tielens A. G. G. M., 2008, @doi [ARA&A] 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145211 , 46, 289

    2008

  122. [131]

    Valentino F., et al., 2020, @doi [A&A] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038322 , 641, A155

    2020 doi

  123. [132]

    C., Li A., 2022, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac930f , 939, 22

    Zhang L., Ho L. C., Li A., 2022, @doi [ApJ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac930f , 939, 22

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.