Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 1 cited by

Limit theorems for the number of sign and level-set clusters of the Gaussian free field

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For the Gaussian free field on $\mathbb{Z}^d$, the number of sign and level-set clusters in a large box has Gaussian fluctuations in $d\ge 4$ at every non-critical level, while in $d=3$ a non-Gaussian Hermite law appears exactly at…

desk verdict First limit theorems for GFF cluster counts, built on a new semi-local chaos expansion; the proof is long and leans on heavy percolation input, but the central argument holds up and the paper deserves serious refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14707 v1 pith:LZU6KM6N submitted 2025-01-24 math.PR math-phmath.MP

Michael McAuley , Stephen Muirhead This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.PRmath-phmath.MP MSC 60G6060G1560F05
keywords Gaussianfreefieldlevel-setclusterssignchaosexpansionpivotalintensitiesHermitedistributionsclusterdensitypercolation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The Gaussian free field on $\mathbb{Z}^d$ is a canonical strongly correlated random field, and this paper asks how many of its sign and level-set clusters (connected components of $\{f>\ell\}$ and $\{f<\ell\}$) sit inside a large box. The answer: in dimensions $d\ge 4$, at every non-critical level the cluster-count fluctuations are asymptotically Gaussian after centering and scaling by the standard deviation. In dimension $d=3$ the limit can instead be a non-Gaussian order-2 Hermite distribution, and this happens precisely at non-degenerate critical points of the cluster density $\mu$. The paper also determines the variance order at every non-critical level, showing that sign clusters have suppressed fluctuations compared with generic levels because $\mu'(0)=0$ by symmetry. The proof is the first chaos expansion for a non-local functional of a strongly correlated Gaussian field, with percolation-theoretic control of the pivotal intensities in the expansion.

What carries the argument

The central object is the chaos expansion of the level-set functional, whose $m$-th coefficient is the pivotal intensity $P(y)=\mathbb{E}[d_y\Xi(f-\ell)|f(y)=\ell]\varphi_{f(y)}(\ell)$; by Proposition 2.7 this equals the $m$-th mixed derivative of $\mathbb{E}[\Xi(f-\ell)]$. The proof's main work is semi-localisation: percolation truncated-arm decay, extended to conditioned fields by a de-pinning argument, shows $P$ can be replaced by a stationary, exponentially decaying $P_\infty$, so each chaos becomes a sum over Wick products with rapidly decaying coefficients. The identity connecting sums of $P_\infty$ to derivatives of $\mu$ then converts analytic properties of $\mu$ into variance asymptotics and limit laws. The tail of the expansion is controlled by an iterated interpolation formula that expresses the tail variance through joint pivotal intensities of a fixed order, avoiding the lack of smoothness of the level-set functional.

What would settle it

Compute (rigorously or numerically) the cluster density $\mu$ near level 0 in dimension $d=3$. If $\mu''(0)\neq 0$, the normalized sign-cluster count should converge to the order-2 Hermite law with variance $\sim (\beta_{3,2}(\mu''(0))^2/2)R^4$; if $\mu''(0)=\mu'''(0)=0$, it should converge to a Gaussian with variance $\sim\sigma^2R^3$. Finding any zero of $\mu'$ with $\mu''\neq 0$ would confirm that the non-Gaussian regime exists, and finding $\mu'(\ell_c)\neq 0$ would confirm the critical lower bound.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Write $N_R(\ell)$ for the number of bounded clusters of $\{f>\ell\}$ and $\{f<\ell\}$ in the box $\Lambda_R$, and let $\mu(\ell)$ be the cluster density from the law of large numbers. The paper proves that for every $\ell\neq \pm\ell_c$ the $m$-th chaos $Q_m$ of $N_R$ has variance governed by the stationary pivotal intensity $P_\infty$, in the explicit form $\sum_{x_2,\ldots,x_m} P_\infty(0,x_2,\ldots,x_m)=(-1)^m \mu^{(m)}(\ell)$. Hence the dominant chaos is the first with a non-vanishing derivative of $\mu$: $\mu'(\ell)\neq 0$ gives a Gaussian limit driven by the first chaos; in $d=3$, $\mu'(\ell)=0$ and $\mu''(\ell)\neq 0$ gives a non-Gaussian order-2 Hermite limit driven by the second chaos; and if the first three derivatives vanish, the variance drops to volume order and the limit is again Gaussian. In $d\ge 4$ all remaining chaoses are Gaussian by the high-order chaos central limit principle, so the whole count is Gaussian at every non-critical level. The sign clusters are covered because $\mu'(0)=0$ by symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The proof leans on the sharp percolation estimate that, at every non-critical level, the probability of a bounded cluster of the GFF excursion set reaching radius $R$ decays faster than any polynomial; without this truncated arm decay, the pivotal intensities cannot be shown to localise and the variance asymptotics collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $d\ge 4$, at every non-critical level including sign clusters, $(N_R(\ell)-\mathbb{E}N_R)/\sqrt{\operatorname{Var}N_R}$ converges to a standard Gaussian.
  • For $d=3$, non-Gaussian order-2 Hermite fluctuations occur exactly at levels where $\mu''(\ell)\neq 0$ and $\mu'(\ell)=0$; whether the sign level $\ell=0$ falls there is left open.
  • The variance asymptotics give explicit orders: for example, in $d\ge 5$, $\operatorname{Var}N_R(\ell)\sim \beta_{d,1}(\mu'(\ell))^2R^{d+2}$ if $\mu'(\ell)\neq 0$ and $\sim\sigma^2R^d$ otherwise, with a logarithmic factor in the $d=4$ borderline case.
  • At the critical level the variance lies between $c_1R^d$ and $c_2R^{d+2}$, and if $\mu'(\ell_c)\neq 0$ the lower bound is actually $\beta_{d,1}(\mu'(\ell_c))^2R^{d+2}(1+o(1))$.
  • The method applies to other level-set functionals of the same field and to any stationary Gaussian field with covariance $|x|^{-(d-2)}$ plus an i.i.d. component, wherever uniform truncated arm decay holds.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The open question of whether $\mu''(0)$ vanishes in $d=3$ is exactly the question of whether sign clusters have a non-Gaussian limit; a computation of the cluster density near zero would settle it, since the paper reduces the law to this derivative.
  • The same pivotal-intensity machinery should transfer to other semi-local functionals such as the volume of the unbounded component above the critical level; monotonicity of that functional suggests only Gaussian limits there.
  • For covariance decays $\alpha<d-2$, the mechanism predicts Hermite limits of every order $2\le m<d/\alpha$ with additional boundary contributions, so the Gaussian/non-Gaussian split found here is the $\alpha=d-2$ case of a broader classification.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proves limit theorems for the number of sign and level-set clusters of the discrete Gaussian free field (GFF) in large boxes. The main results are: (i) in dimension d ≥ 4, the centered and normalized cluster count converges to a standard Gaussian at every non-critical level (Theorem 1.1); (ii) in dimension d = 3, the limit is Gaussian except at non-degenerate critical points of the cluster density μ, where an order-2 Hermite distribution appears (Theorem 1.2); (iii) variance asymptotics for all non-critical levels, exhibiting Berry-cancellation suppression at levels where μ' = 0 (Theorem 1.4); and (iv) volume-order lower and R^{d+2}-order upper variance bounds at criticality (Theorem 1.6). The proof combines a Wiener-Itô chaos expansion for level-set functionals (Theorem 2.9), semi-localization of the chaotic components via truncated arm-decay estimates (Section 3), extensions of Breuer-Major/Dobrushin-Major theory to semi-local functionals (Appendix B), and a general modular theorem under a uniform arm-decay assumption (Theorem 1.10).

Significance. If correct, these results constitute the first limit theorems for the cluster count of the GFF and reveal a genuinely dimension-dependent Gaussian/non-Gaussian transition. The methodological contribution is substantial: the paper introduces a tractable chaos expansion for non-local functionals of strongly correlated Gaussian fields, links the coefficients to pivotal intensities, and shows how percolation-theoretic arm decay controls the tail of the expansion. The variance suppression for sign clusters (Berry cancellation) is a new geometric phenomenon for the GFF. The paper is honest about its limitations (e.g., Questions 1.3, 1.5, 1.7) and isolates the external DGRS23 arm-decay input cleanly. The proofs are detailed and internally coherent, with machine-checkable algebra in the appendices and clearly stated assumptions.

minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.2 (proof of Proposition 4.1, critical levels)] In the paragraph following the mean-value theorem, the text states that taking ε→0 shows the right derivative of μ at ℓ_c is P∞(ℓ_c;0), and then concludes μ′(ℓ_c)=P∞(ℓ_c;0). However, the displayed equation in the same paragraph gives μ′(ℓ_c+ε̃)=−P∞(ℓ_c+ε̃;0), so the right derivative should be −P∞(ℓ_c;0), and the conclusion should read μ′(ℓ_c)=−P∞(ℓ_c;0), consistent with (4.1) for non-critical levels.
  2. [Proof of Proposition 3.4] The sentence before (3.27) claims the terms vanish "unless each point of x and y is within distance r of ∂Λ_R". This is stronger than what Lemmas 3.11 and 3.17 provide (only one point in each tuple needs to be near the boundary, together with the diameter support condition), and the displayed bound (3.27) appears to contain typos: the summation index "x2" should presumably be "y1", and the summation range over boundary-layer points should be spelled out. Please clarify the argument.
  3. [Proposition 5.2] The displayed bound for φ_{f(x),f^t(y)}(ℓ,ℓ) is garbled ("1√ 1 − t2Corr(f (x), f(y)"). Please display the correct expression, for example using the bivariate normal density and the fact that Corr(f(x), f^t(y)) = tG(x−y)/G(0), so that the subsequent integration in t is transparent.
  4. [Throughout] The paper repeatedly writes "Weiner-Itô" (Abstract, Section 1.4.1, and elsewhere); this should be "Wiener-Itô".
  5. [Theorem 1.2] The statement "Z if ℓ ∈ R \ C′" includes levels where μ′(ℓ)=0 with μ″(ℓ)=0 (e.g., flat critical points). The limit is indeed Gaussian in those cases, but a short remark explaining this (and pointing to the third and fourth cases of Theorem 1.4) would help readers connect the two theorems.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the cluster-count limit theorems are derived from the chaos expansion, semi-localization estimates, and external percolation theorems rather than from the target limits.

full rationale

The central claims are new theorems proved from the paper's own definitions together with external, non-overlapping mathematical inputs. The chaos expansion for level-set functionals (Theorem 2.9) expresses each chaotic component through pivotal intensities; Proposition 4.1 derives the derivatives of the cluster density mu from those same intensities; the variance asymptotics in Theorem 1.4 and the limit theorems in Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 then follow from the semi-local Breuer-Major / Dobrushin-Major theory developed in Appendix B, after Section 3 verifies the required stationarity, summability, and decay properties using pinned truncated arm decay. The only heavy external input, the truncated arm decay of DGRS23, is a published theorem by a disjoint set of authors, so citing it is independent evidence rather than a self-citation chain. Self-citations to BMM22 and BMM24b appear mainly for context, for an upper-bound remark, and for an alternative variance argument; the paper supplies its own proof of extensivity (Proposition 5.1) and of the general variance upper bound (Proposition 5.2), so those citations are not load-bearing. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction: the set C' is defined via the cluster density, the constants sigma are limits of explicitly defined variances, and the paper transparently states in Theorem 1.10 which conclusions hold under only the a priori property T_l instead of the full DGRS23 input. No equation is found to be equivalent to another by construction, and no claimed prediction reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Gaussian analysis and on external percolation inputs. No free parameters are fitted; constants such as β_{d,k} and σ are limits of explicit sums. The key external input is DGRS23's sharp phase transition / truncated arm decay, plus Assumption 1.9's i.i.d. component. No physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The GFF on Z^d, d≥3, satisfies Assumptions 1.8 and 1.9: covariance decays as c|x|^{-(d-2)} and the field has an i.i.d. Gaussian component.
    Used throughout; in particular guaranteeing non-degeneracy, finite energy, and the de-pinning bounds in Proposition 3.16 and Lemma 3.12.
  • domain assumption At every ℓ≠±ℓ_c, the truncated arm events for {f>ℓ} and {f<ℓ} have super-polynomial decay (DGRS23, Theorem 3.13).
    This is the load-bearing external input for all semi-localization and pivotal-intensity decay; without it the proofs of Propositions 3.1 and 3.4 fail.
  • domain assumption Two-arm decay / uniqueness of the unbounded component for supercritical levels, equation (3.6), from HJ06.
    Used to prove Proposition 3.15 and continuity of the critical pivotal intensity, which supports the treatment of critical levels in Proposition 4.1.
  • domain assumption The cluster density μ is real-analytic on R\{±ℓ_c} (PS22).
    Used to conclude that the set of critical points is finite outside a neighbourhood of the critical levels; Proposition 4.1 gives an alternative proof of smoothness but not analyticity.
  • standard math Wiener-Itô chaos expansion and diagram formula (Janson 1997; Nualart-Peccati 2012).
    Foundation of Section 2 and Appendix B; provides the orthogonal decomposition and moment computations for chaotic components.
  • standard math Classical Dobrushin-Major and Breuer-Major limit theorems for local additive functionals.
    Reference frame for the semi-local extension in Appendix B; the paper generalizes these results to semi-local kernels.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Limit theorems for the number of sign and level-set clusters of the Gaussian free field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LZU6KM6N

@misc{pith2026250114707,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Limit theorems for the number of sign and level-set clusters of the Gaussian free field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LZU6KM6N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14707}
}
abstract

We study the limiting fluctuations of the number of sign and level-set clusters of the Gaussian free field on $\mathbb{Z}^d$, $d \ge 3$, that are contained in a large domain. In dimension $d \ge 4$ we prove that the fluctuations are Gaussian at all non-critical levels, while in dimension $d=3$ we show that fluctuations may be Gaussian or non-Gaussian depending on the level. We also show that the sign clusters experience a form of Berry cancellation in all dimensions, that is, the fluctuations of the sign cluster count is suppressed compared to generic levels. Our proof is based on controlling the Weiner-It\^{o} chaos expansion of the cluster count using percolation theoretic inputs; to our knowledge this is the first time that chaos expansion techniques have been applied to analyse a non-local functional of a strongly correlated Gaussian field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14707 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two complete Feynman diagrams on the vertices {Xi,j} in the case I = 2, k = 4; only the first diagram contributes to the diagram formula. 2.2. Chaos expansion for smooth functionals. We begin by establishing a chaos expan￾sion for smooth functionals; this expansion is in terms of Wick products, and is different to previous approaches in the literature (see Remark 2.3). Proposition 2.2 (Chaos expansion for smooth fun… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Illustration of pivotal configurations for the cluster count in ΛR (i.e. Ξ(E) is the sum of the number of components of E and ΛR \ E that do not intersect ∂ΛR, where E are the black vertices). Left: The configuration is (−1)- pivotal at y1, 1-pivotal at y2, and not pivotal at y3. Right: The configuration is 1-pivotal at (y1, y2). α y ∈ N D 0 be its associated multi-index, and let ˜α y be defined by ˜α y i = max{α y … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Central limit theorems for non-linear functionals of Gaussian fields via Wiener chaos decomposition

    math.PR 2025-12 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A field-level Breuer-Major CLT is proposed via Wiener chaos, with applications to powers of the discrete GFF, but the odd-power GFF limit uses an incorrect normalization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTIO...

  2. [2]

    Aizenman, H

    M. Aizenman, H. Kesten, and C. M. Newman. Uniqueness of the infinite cluster and continuity of connectivity functions for short and long range percolation. Comm. Math. Phys. , 111(4):505--531, 1987

    work page 1987

  3. [3]

    M. V. Berry. Statistics of nodal lines and points in chaotic quantum billiards: perimeter corrections, fluctuations, curvature. J. Phys. A. , 35(13):3025--3038, 2002

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    M. Biskup. Extrema of the two-dimensional discrete Gaussian free field , pages 163--407. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, Vol 304 (ed. M. Barlow and G. Slade), 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Bricmont, J

    J. Bricmont, J. L. Lebowitz, and C. Maes. Percolation in strongly correlated systems: the massless G aussian field. Jour. Stat. Phys. , 48(5--6):1249--1268, 1987

    work page 1987

  6. [6]

    Breuer and P

    P. Breuer and P. Major. Central limit theorems for non-linear functionals of G aussian fields. J. Mult. Anal. , pages 425--441, 1983

    work page 1983

  7. [7]

    Beliaev, M

    D. Beliaev, M. McAuley, and S. Muirhead. Fluctuations of the number of excursion sets of planar G aussian fields. Prob. Math. Phys. , 3(1):105–144, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Beliaev, M

    D. Beliaev, M. McAuley, and S. Muirhead. A central limit theorem for the number of excursion set components of G aussian fields. Ann. Probab. , 52(3):882--922, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    Beliaev, M

    D. Beliaev, M. McAuley, and S. Muirhead. A covariance formula for the number of excursion set components of G aussian fields and applications. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar \' e Probab. Stat. (to appear) , 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Buckley and A

    J. Buckley and A. Nishry. Gaussian complex zeroes are not always normal: limit theorems on the disc. Probab. Math. Phys. , 3(3):675--706, 2022

    2022

  3. [11]

    J. T. Cox and G. Grimmett. Central limit theorems for associated random variables and the percolation model. Ann. Probab. , 12(2):514--528, 1984

    1984

  4. [12]

    Chatterjee

    S. Chatterjee. Chaos, concentration, and multiple valleys. arXiv preprint arXiv:0810.4221 , 2008

    2008 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Chiarini and M

    A. Chiarini and M. Nitzschner. Entropic repulsion for the G aussian free field conditioned on disconnection by level-sets. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 177(1):525--575, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Duminil-Copin, S

    H. Duminil-Copin, S. Goswami, P.-F. Rodriguez, and F. Severo. Equality of critical parameters for percolation of G aussian free field level-sets. Duke Math. J. , 172(5):839--913, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    R. L. Dobrushin and P. Major. Non-central limit theorems for non-linear functionals of G aussian fields. Wahrsch. Verw. Gebiete , 50:27--52, 1979

    1979

  8. [16]

    R. L. Dobrushin. G aussian and their subordinated self-similar random fields. Ann. Probab. , 7(1):1--28, 1979

    1979

  9. [17]

    Drewitz, A

    A. Drewitz, A. Pr \' e vost, and P.-F. Rodriguez. The sign clusters of the massless G aussian free field percolate on Z ^ d , d 3 (and more). Commun. Math. Phys. , 362(1), 2018

    2018

  10. [18]

    Estrade and J

    A. Estrade and J. R. Le\' o n. A central limit theorem for the E uler characteristic of a G aussian excursion set. Ann. Probab. , 44(6):3849--3878, 2016

    2016

  11. [19]

    S. J. L. v. Eijndhoven and J. L. H. Meyers. New orthogonality relations for the H ermite polynomials and related H ilbert spaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 146:89--98, 1990

    1990

  12. [20]

    Fox and M

    R. Fox and M. S. Taqqu. Central limit theorems for quadratic forms in random variables having long range dependence. Probab. Theory Related Fields , 74:213--248, 1987

    1987

  13. [21]

    G. R. Grimmett. Percolation . Springer, 1999

    1999

  14. [22]

    Goswami, P.-F

    S. Goswami, P.-F. Rodriguez, and F. Severo. On the radius of G aussian free field excursion clusters. Ann. Probab. , 50(5):1675--1724, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    a ggstr \

    O. H \" a ggstr \" o m and J. Jonasson. Uniqueness and non-uniqueness in percolation theory. Probab. Surveys , 3:289--344, 2006

    2006

  16. [24]

    Houdr\' e and V

    C. Houdr\' e and V. P\' e rez-Abreu. Covariance identities and inequalities for functionals on W einer and P oisson spaces. Ann. Probab. , 23(1):400--419, 1995

    1995

  17. [25]

    S. Janson. Gaussian H ilbert spaces , volume 129 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997

    1997

  18. [26]

    G. F. Lawler and V. Limic. Random walk: A modern introduction . Cambridge University Press, 2012

    2012

  19. [27]

    J. L. Lebowitz and H. Saleur. Percolation in strongly correlated systems. Phys. A , 138:194--205, 1986

    1986

  20. [28]

    T. Lupu. From loop clusters and random interlacements to the free field. Ann. Probab. , 44(3):2117--2146, 2016

    2016

  21. [29]

    P. K. M. Krishnapur and I. Wigman. Nodal length fluctuations for arithmetic random waves. Ann. Math. , 177(2):699--737, 2013

    2013

  22. [30]

    Marinucci, G

    D. Marinucci, G. Peccati, M. Rossi, and I. Wigman. Non-universality of nodal length distribution for arithmetic random waves. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 26(3):926--960, 2016

    2016

  23. [31]

    Marinucci, M

    D. Marinucci, M. Rossi, and I. Wigman. The asymptotic equivalence of the sample trispectrum and the nodal length for random spherical harmonics. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar \' e Probab. Stat. , 56(1):374--390, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Muirhead and F

    S. Muirhead and F. Severo. Percolation of strongly correlated G aussian fields I . D ecay of subcritical connection probabilities. Prob. Math. Phys. , 5(2):357--412, 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    Marinucci and I

    D. Marinucci and I. Wigman. The defect variance of random spherical harmonics. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. , 44(35), 2011

    2011

  26. [34]

    Nitzschner

    M. Nitzschner. Disconnection by level sets of the discrete G aussian free field and entropic repulsion. Electron. J. Probab. , 23:1--21, 2018

    2018

  27. [35]

    Nualart and G

    D. Nualart and G. Peccati. Central limit theorems for sequences of multiple stochastic integrals. Ann. Probab. , 33(1):177--193, 2005

    2005

  28. [36]

    Nualart and G

    D. Nualart and G. Peccati. Normal approximation with Malliavin calculus: From Stein's method to universality . Cambridge University Press, 2012

    2012

  29. [37]

    Nourdin, G

    I. Nourdin, G. Peccati, and M. Rossi. Nodal statistics of planar random waves. Commun. Math. Phys. , 369(1):99--151, 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    Nazarov and M

    F. Nazarov and M. Sodin. On the number of nodal domains of random spherical harmonics. Amer. J. Math. , 131(5):1337--1357, 2009

    2009

  31. [39]

    Nazarov and M

    F. Nazarov and M. Sodin. Asymptotic laws for the spatial distribution and the number of connected components of zero sets of G aussian random functions. J. Math. Phys. Anal. Geo. , 12(3):205--278, 2016

    2016

  32. [40]

    Nazarov and M

    F. Nazarov and M. Sodin. Fluctuations in the number of nodal domains. J. Math. Phys. , 61(12):123302, 39, 2020

    2020

  33. [41]

    M. D. Penrose. A central limit theorem with applications to percolation, epidemics and B oolean models. Ann. Probab. , 29(4):1515--1546, 2001

    2001

  34. [42]

    Popov and B

    S. Popov and B. R\' a th. On decoupling inequalities and percolation of the excursion sets of the G aussian free field. J. Stat. Phys. , 159:312--320, 2015

    2015

  35. [43]

    Panagiotis and F

    C. Panagiotis and F. Severo. Analyticity of G aussian free field percolation observables. Commun. Math. Phys. , 396:187--223, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    S. Rahman. W iener-- H ermite polynomial expansion for multivariate G aussian probability measures. J. Math. Anal. Appl. , 454(1):303--334, 2017

    2017

  37. [45]

    Rodriguez and A.-S

    P.-F. Rodriguez and A.-S. Sznitman. Phase transition and level-set percolation for the G aussian free field. Comm. Math. Phys. , 320(2):571--601, 2013

    2013

  38. [46]

    E. Slud. Multiple W iener- I t\^ o integral expansions for level-crossing-count functionals. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields , 87:349--364, 1991

    1991

  39. [47]

    E. Slud. MWI representation of the number of curve-crossings by a differentiable G aussian process. Ann. Probab. , 22:1355--1380, 1994

    1994

  40. [48]

    Sznitman

    A.-S. Sznitman. Disconnection and level-set percolation for the G aussian free field. J. Math. Soc. Japan , 67(4):1801--1843, 2015

    2015

  41. [49]

    Sznitman

    A.-S. Sznitman. On macroscopic holes in some supercritical strongly dependent percolation models. Ann. Probab. , 47(4):2459--2493, 2019

    2019

  42. [50]

    Terrin and M

    N. Terrin and M. S. Taqqu. A noncentral limit theorem for quadratic forms of G aussian stationary sequences. J. Theo. Probab. , 3(3):449--475, 1990

    1990

  43. [51]

    I. Wigman. Fluctuations of the nodal length of random spherical harmonics. Commun. Math. Phys. , 298(3):787--831, 2010

    2010

  44. [52]

    Werner and E

    W. Werner and E. Powell. Lecture notes on the Gaussian free field . Soci\' e t\' e math\' e matique de France, 2022

    2022

  45. [53]

    Y. Zhang. A martingale approach in the study of percolation clusters on the Z ^d lattice. J. Theoret. Probab. , 14(1):165--187, 2001

    2001

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.