Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Survey of Imbalanced Data Methodologies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.02240 v1 pith:M4FBYJ6W submitted 2021-04-06 stat.ML cs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.LG
keywords datamethodologiesalgorithmsimbalancedmodelinganalyzedappliedclass-imbalance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Imbalanced data set is a problem often found and well-studied in financial industry. In this paper, we reviewed and compared some popular methodologies handling data imbalance. We then applied the under-sampling/over-sampling methodologies to several modeling algorithms on UCI and Keel data sets. The performance was analyzed for class-imbalance methods, modeling algorithms and grid search criteria comparison.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Absolute Evaluation Measures for Machine Learning: A Survey

    cs.LG 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A survey compiles bounded absolute evaluation metrics for classification, clustering, and ranking and proposes decision trees for metric selection, but several formulas are reproduced incorrectly.

Pith tools